The provided graph illustrates the procedure involved in producing/generaying electricity

from coal . Overall, there are eight steps encompassed within the process, beginning with the
supply of coal and ending with the disposal of ash.
Commencing with the initial step of the process, the supply of coal goes into a pulverizer
where coal is converted into powder/ coal is supplied and undergoes pulverization(sự
nghiền thành bột), transforming it into powder. After that, the dust from pulverizing the
coal/the dust produced during the pulverization process is collected before it enters/ entering
the boilers and burned in high temperature. / where it is burned at a high temperature. The
burning coal produces / this combustion (quá trình đốt cháy) produces heat that boils the
water and turned it into steams. In the next stage, steams from boiler enter a pipe which
connected to the turbine. The steams generate the spinning/rotation of the turbine, which is
drive the generator to produce electricity in the substation/transformer. After passing through
the turbine, the steam is condensed into water in the condenser. Subsquently, this water is
returned into the boiler and begin /initiating the process again. Finally, dust from the burning
coal process is collected and ready to/prepare for disposal.

The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a
country involved in some kinds of home tasks (cooking, cleaning, pet
caring and repairing the house). The second chart shows the amount of
time each gender spent on each task per day. Summarize the information
by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where
relevant.

The first chart illustrates the participation percentage of two genders (male and female)
relevant to household tasks (cooking, cleaning, pet caring and repairing the house), while the
second depicts the dailytime allocation for each gender performing these task.
Overall, it is clearly seen that cooking and cleaning emerged as the predominant tasks
undertaken by the majority of both men and women, which also accounted for the most
considerable amount of time spent by both gender.
As we can see from the chart, just over 80% women spent time on cooking, a higher
percentage than the men , which stands at 60%. Similarly, 60% women doing cleaning task
compared to the figure of men, at around 40%. Moreover, a slightly larger percentage of men
take responsibility in pet caring, surpassing 20%. It is noticeable that the percentage of men
repairing houses is doubled the amount of women, with the respective figure being narrowly
below 20% and 10%.
Regarding/In reference to the second chart, it is worth noting that the average duration of
woman performing household chores is consistently higher than men, reaching more than 80
minutes, while the figures for men are just 60 minutes . Likewise, the time spent by women
engaging cleaning tasks was greater more than 20 minutes than the men does/ exceeded that
of men by over 20 minutes, with the corresponding numbers standing at approximately 68
minutes and 45 minutes, respectively . A noticeable pattern can be observed that both men
and women enjoy pet caring, reaching precisely 20 minutes/ emerges where both men and
women spend precisely 20 minutes on pet caring. . In addition, it is crucial to mention that
the duration of men involving in house repair job was more pronounced compared to the
women, with the figures almost doubling, at just under 20 minutes and 5 minutes,
respectively.
Bài viết mẫu:
The first chart illustrates the percentage of participation in household tasks, including
cooking, cleaning, pet caring, and house repair, for both genders (male and female).
Meanwhile, the second chart provides a detailed breakdown (phân tích chi tiết) of the daily
time allocation for each gender in performing these tasks.

Overall, it is evident that cooking and cleaning are the predominant tasks for the majority of
both men and women, consuming the most substantial amount of time for both genders.

As observed from the charts, just over 80% of women spent time on cooking, a percentage
higher than that for men, which stands at 60%. Similarly, 60% of women engage in cleaning
tasks compared to men, who constitute around 40%. Additionally, a slightly larger
percentage of men take responsibility for pet caring, surpassing 20%. Notably, the
percentage of men involved in house repair is double that of women, with the respective
figures being just under 20% and 10%.

Turning to the second chart, it is noteworthy that the average duration of time spent by
women on household chores consistently exceeds that of men, reaching more than 80
minutes, while the figures for men are just 60 minutes. Similarly, the time spent by women on
cleaning tasks exceeds that of men by over 20 minutes, with the corresponding numbers
standing at approximately 68 minutes and 45 minutes, respectively. A discernible
(=noticable) pattern emerges where both men and women spend precisely 20 minutes on pet
caring. In addition, it is crucial to mention that the duration of time men spend on house
repair jobs is more pronounced compared to women; the figures almost double, at just under
20 minutes and 5 minutes, respectively.

The provided data offers insights into the variations in weather conditions throughout the
entire year in two specific cities in Australia. The line graph depicts the average maximum
and minimum temperatures per month in Brisbane and Canberra, while the accompanying
charts illustrate the number of days with rainfall.
Overall, it is clearly seen that temperatures were higher in Brisbane than in Canberra in
general. Moreover, an identical trend can be observed in the average temperature in both
cities, with cooler temperatures occurring in Canberra. In contrast, the average number of
days with rainfall witness an opposite trend.
Regarding the line graph, Brisbane reached its highest temperature precisely in February,
reaching 30 degrees Celsius. Similarly, the daily maximum temperature in Canberra occurred
in January and February, exceeding 25 degrees Celsius. The lowest minimum daily average
temperatures in both cities occurred in July, with respective figures for Canberra and
Brisbane being 1 degree Celsius and 10 degrees Celsius.
In terms of the bar chart, Brisbane witness the highest number of day with rainfall, peaking at
14 days from December to April. Conversely, Canberra, encounters its rainiest period from
June to October, reaching the highest figures at 10 days.

Bài viết mẫu:

The provided data offers profound insights into the yearly weather variations in two distinct
cities in Australia. The line graph meticulously illustrates the monthly average maximum and
minimum temperatures in Brisbane and Canberra, while the accompanying charts present a
comprehensive view of the number of days with rainfall.

Overall, a conspicuous disparity is evident, showcasing consistently higher temperatures

(cho thấy nhiệt độ ở Brisbane liên tục cao hơn so với Canberra) in Brisbane compared to Canberra.
Notably, a parallel trend is discernible in the average temperature for both cities, with
Canberra experiencing cooler temperatures. In contrast, the average frequency of rainfall
days demonstrates an inverse pattern. (Ngược lại, số ngày mưa trung bình thì thể hiện một xu
hướng ngược lại.)

Analyzing the line graph, it is noteworthy that Brisbane attains its highest temperature
pinnacle precisely in February, soaring to an impressive 30 degrees Celsius. Similarly, the
daily maximum temperature in Canberra peaks in January and February, surpassing 25
degrees Celsius. July registers the lowest minimum daily average temperatures in both
cities, with Canberra plummeting to 1 degree Celsius and Brisbane to 10 degrees Celsius.

Turning attention to the bar chart, Brisbane stands out for witnessing the highest number of
days with rainfall, peaking at 14 days from December to April. Conversely, Canberra
encounters its most substantial rainfall period from June to October, reaching the zenith at
10 days
The provided data offers profound insights into the percentage of teenagers practicing
musical instruments, while the accompanying chart represents the figures of children
choosing types of musical instruments in a particular area in the UK over two years, 1996 and
2016.
Overall, there is a noticeable disparity in the percentage of children who participated in
musical instrument lessons and those who did not. The evidence indicates a remarkable
increase in the enrollment of children in musical instrument classes over the last decade.
Looking at the choice of musical instruments, the piano was considered the optimal option
for music learners in 1996, while the keyboard emerged as the most favored instrument in the
subsequent 10 years.
Regarding the pie chart, it is noticeable that the number of youngsters participating in music
classes has experienced a dramatic surge, exceeding the figure from the last 10 years by
almost half, with percentages of 44% and 76%, respectively. On the other hand, the number of
children uninterested in playing musical instruments has seen a significant decline,
decreasing from twice the previous amount to just under one-fifth of the overall chart, with
the respective figure being 54% and 24%.
In reference of the line graph, the most popular type of musical instrument being learnt in
1996 was piano, at 30%, followed by keyboard with more than 20%. In addition, more than
10% of children learning violin and electric guitar, around 13% and 14% respectively while
there was about 12% of those learning more than 1 instrument. It is noticeable that in 2016,
keyboard learners registered a sharp climb, reached its peak at 30%. Conversely, piano
experienced a gradually decline, at approximately 28%. Meanwhile, there was a moderate
increase in the percentage of people who play more than 1 musical tool, at about 13%.