ev), tad Recent excavations of the last decade made (students of Bronze Age in the Carpathian asin familiar with the Hurbanovo type and aiterwards with the Tokod-Ogyalla group as ) celf-standing, geographically definable popu Jotion, having’ characteristic archaeological i. Bona was the first to summarize the his- urch and the opinions expressed on nce a very large number of new covered in the last years, modify on the situation of the group, e a review of research made hitherto the opinions of students-as'a necessity. « first finds belonging to the material of our group have been presented by J. Hampel.* ne finding place is unknown, they came to © Bsztergom Museum from the ‘collection of (© Primate-Archbishop. ilar finds were published by M. Wosin- soley equally irom the Esztergom Museum? ) 1904 the periodical Archeologiai: Brtesi iblished five vessels of our proup, uncovered Tata-Tévdros.t these publications did not recognize the eparate type yet, they have dealt with the presented material in the framework of the danubian inerusted pottery. presented Tokod-type finds, un- in the surroundings of ygnize their disting- He classified these Rébacséesény-Fudipusz- formally related Kis- ceceneniia 2solics was the first to characterize iypes divergent from the classic tag forms. In her monograph she pres {| scattered finds from Dorog and Tokod as her statement* She regarded these ‘of the Kisepostag jugs, derivations prone Aue in, Hungary. Peper for obtale rate pice hansen ates SAbiunen Brehisrigver © Monge, (Bue badapest Tee Ph, 3 ia 8. Sa he sxetehes, losing the text tiniay! tne siisory of Cyar-up tothe ihc aks te Brome Age. Karon 1 Prehigorieal Inerasted Pottery. tin 65 Aga-Qeaik 4 Data to the Early and Middle Bronze _ and Southern Problems of 1 Sr fz (63> (26 oe Set ee the Szekszird I culture. She proposed the name of Kisapostag II for them.” The hitherto known westernmost occurrenc: of the type was found by her in the Hainburg- Teichtal cemetery of Gata character.* ‘The establishment of this new. period dues not.seem to be justified any more, as A. Mo- zsolics defined it on the basis of stray pic only.-The incrusted pottery of this type has occurred since in a wellknit complex of settle ment and cemetery, together with material of the Hatvan type, near the bend of th Danube (Nyergestjfalu-Brickworks, Neszmély Varhegy, Kiskeszi (Malé Kosihy) so it canno be regarded as a selbstending Kisaposag p> riod. ‘Afterwards the problems of our group w: dealt with by Slovakian research for @ lon ‘An excavation of the” Archaeological, Insti- tute of the Slovale of Science, led by P. Caplovig, has uncovered an Early Bronze ‘Age cemetery of 92 graves at Ogyalla (Hurba- ‘hovo). Investigation on the material of this cemetery resulted in the idea of the Hur a- Hove ype asa self-standing achiéclogical group. The full material of the cemetery, con- sisting of contracted skeletons, is unpublished so far, only smaller reports were presented by P. Caplovié and A, Todtk." Investigating the material of the grave P, Caplovié noticed that some small ‘us inerusted omament were occurring 8 goods frequently.!” He found @ Togies of form and decoration in the © ‘of the phase Kisapostag II deserit Mozsolics. The majority of the finds has. ho ever, an Aunjetitz character. Adding the data, she came to the result that the com was a site of the so-called Hurbanovo typ alloyed from the Aunjetitz and Kisap: types.4# 6 A,MozsoLics: The Early Bronze Age Urn, Cemetery of ge ach, Hung. 3b (es 16) BS. 3 nos ins, mB capLovic: op. oft PL 177,-0n the tower fhe photopraps of the grave. / naabiel ip: ISEn - Jt iit felis ie Fe tty etre + Resia HG iH a hile ita : HP in ne a ti j : ae . H ayanya “oe mewe.ea inne