The document discusses the positive and negative effects of phone addiction on social and individual life. It argues that while mobile phones provide constant connectivity and freedom, they can also intrude on privacy and disrupt public spaces. While mobile phones are useful communication tools, their unrestricted use has led to issues like disturbances in professional environments. In conclusion, the benefits of mobile phones depend on how users intend to use them, as even the best innovations can have negative byproducts if abused.
The document discusses the positive and negative effects of phone addiction on social and individual life. It argues that while mobile phones provide constant connectivity and freedom, they can also intrude on privacy and disrupt public spaces. While mobile phones are useful communication tools, their unrestricted use has led to issues like disturbances in professional environments. In conclusion, the benefits of mobile phones depend on how users intend to use them, as even the best innovations can have negative byproducts if abused.
The document discusses the positive and negative effects of phone addiction on social and individual life. It argues that while mobile phones provide constant connectivity and freedom, they can also intrude on privacy and disrupt public spaces. While mobile phones are useful communication tools, their unrestricted use has led to issues like disturbances in professional environments. In conclusion, the benefits of mobile phones depend on how users intend to use them, as even the best innovations can have negative byproducts if abused.
PHONE ADDICTION IELTS BAND 9 ESSAY "People attend both work and personal calls through mobile phone anytime of the day.
What are the positive and negative
effects on social and individual life?" INTRODUCTION The citizens of the global village are expected to be mobile, freely transient over space, and always connected, wired to the world-wide communication chain anywhere anytime.
Thence, mobile phones have become part and
parcel of our everyday life.
Many consider cellular phones as perfectly
proper, if not essential, as a round the clock business and personal tool, others question such unrestricted usage. All have their justifications. PARAGRAPH 1 The basis of mobile phone’s popularity, surely, has always been the uninterrupted scope for being “connected.”
What cell phones have given us is freedom to
roam while being within the secure bond of modern communication.
The manufacturers and service providers of
mobile communication devices have enhanced the portability ofcommuniqué to the degree of virtual extremity.
Unrestricted mobile communication has
enabled us to live life to the practically fullest. PARAGRAPH 2 The flip side of the coin presents a different picture.
While cell phones keep us connected, they remain as
the autonomous usher of intrusion, to privacy and solidarity of individuals.
It is also common, everyday, to see the decorum of
distinguished environments being violated by ringing cell phones and people talking over them.
So, mobile communication devices, which are meant
to be ideally personal communication devices, are often the means of public disturbance. CONCLUSION The unavoidable human tragedy is all our endeavors end in toxic byproducts.
The best innovations have all too frequently caused the
worst incidents.Mobile phones are beneficial, no doubt, but have been inarticulately used, if not abused, to the point of attrition.
Thus, the reasonable conclusion, of the argument for
and against the unrestricted usage of mobile phones, to be made is that the goodness of it is subjective and is reflective of the likeness of the users’ intentions.