How intelligence tests segregate society

Intelligence tests, based on definition, are series of tasks designed to measure the
capacity to make abstractions, to learn, and to deal with novel situations. These tests are also
used to measure human intelligence quotient as measured against an age-based average
intelligence score. The most widely used intelligence tests include the Stanford-Binet
Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler scales. Intelligence tests should be used as a way to provide
assistance to the student instead of serving as a way to create labels, placement concerns, or
other forms of academic oppression. We often use these tests as a way to grade teachers and
students on the effectiveness of their teaching and learning processes.

Contrary to what was stated above, IQ tests do create labels, placement concerns and
other forms of academic oppression especially in students. In school, students are sectioned
based on their IQ levels, section 1 having those students who excels in class. Those with low IQ
are looked down on, not only by higher sectioned students, but also by some teachers. This is
one factors on how IQ tests segregate society. Another factor is when applying for jobs. IQ tests
plays a big role on the acceptance of an applicant for a certain job. Those with low IQ results
usually have no choice but to apply for jobs that are skill based which IQ tests results are not
considered such as field workers, garbage collectors, factory workers, and the such.

Moreover, many argues that these tests that psychometrician use are culturally biased
thus IQ tests should vary from culture to culture. Some researchers say that intelligence is a
concept specific to a particular culture. They maintain that it appears differently depending on
the context – in the same way that many cultural behaviours would. What may be considered
intelligent in one environment, therefore, might not in others. As indicated by certain
specialists, the "social explicitness" of insight makes IQ tests one-sided towards the conditions
where they were created – in particular white, Western culture. This makes them possibly tricky
in socially assorted settings. The utilization of similar test among various networks would
neglect to perceive the diverse social qualities that shape what every local area esteems as
insightful conduct. Additionally, some researchers say such tests cannot objectively and equally
measure an individual’s intelligence at all.

In conclusion, intelligence tests do segregate society based on the high and low scores
of the tests, and by the culture each test takers are in. It is then recommended to set each
intelligence tests based from culture to culture to avoid biased results. Recognizing these issues
could then assist those responsible for training and social approach to look for arrangements.
Explicit mediations could be aimed to help youngsters who have been influenced by these
underlying disparities or presented to unsafe substances. Over the long haul, the viability of
these intercessions could be observed by contrasting IQ tests regulated with similar youngsters
prior and then afterward a mediation.