Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents 2 Culture:
Giving Meaning to Human Lives 30
3 Ethnography:
Studying Culture 54
4 Linguistic Anthropology:
Relating Language and Culture 80
6 Foodways:
Finding, Making, and Eating Food 136
7 Environmental Anthropology:
Relating to the Natural World 164
8 Economics:
Working, Sharing, and Buying 190
9 Politics:
Cooperation, Conflict, and Power Relations 218
13 Religion:
Ritual and Belief 328
14 The Body:
Biocultural Perspectives on Health and Illness 356
15 Materiality:
Constructing Social Relationships and Meanings
with Things 384
vii
Contents
Letter from the Authors xxi
About the Authors xxii
Preface xxiii
Acknowledgments xxviii
1 Anthropology:
Asking Questions About Humanity 3
How Did Anthropology Begin? 5
The Disruptions of Industrialization 5
The Theory of Evolution 6
Colonial Origins of Cultural Anthropology 7
Anthropology as a Global Discipline 8
ix
x CONTENTS
2 Culture:
Giving Meaning to Human Lives 31
What Is Culture? 33
Elements of Culture 33
Defining Culture in This Book 39
3 Ethnography:
Studying Culture 55
What Distinguishes Ethnographic Fieldwork from Other Types
of Social Research? 57
Fieldwork 58
Seeing the World from “the Native’s Point of View” 58
Avoiding Cultural “Tunnel Vision” 61
4 Linguistic Anthropology:
Relating Language and Culture 81
How Do Anthropologists Study Language? 83
CLASSIC CONTRIBUTIONS: Eric Wolf, Culture, and the World System 120
THINKING LIKE AN ANTHROPOLOGIST: Understanding Global Integration
Through Commodities 117
DOING FIELDWORK: Tracking Emergent Forms of Citizenship
with Aihwa Ong 131
CONTENTS xiii
6 Foodways:
Finding, Making, and Eating Food 137
Why Is There No Universal Human Diet? 140
Human Dietary Adaptability and Constraints 140
Cultural Influences on Human Evolution: Digesting Milk 141
7 Environmental Anthropology:
Relating to the Natural World 165
Do All People See Nature in the Same Way? 168
The Human–Nature Divide? 169
The Cultural Landscape 170
8 Economics:
Working, Sharing, and Buying 191
Is Money Really the Measure of All Things? 194
Culture, Economics, and Value 195
The Neoclassical Perspective 196
The Substantivist–Formalist Debate 196
The Marxist Perspective 197
The Cultural Economics Perspective 199
How Does Culture Shape the Value and Meaning of Money? 201
The Cultural Dimensions of Money 201
Money and the Distribution of Power 202
9 Politics:
Cooperation, Conflict, and Power Relations 219
Does Every Society Have a Government? 221
The Idea of “Politics” and the Problem of Order 222
Structural-Functionalist Models of Political Stability 223
Neo-Evolutionary Models of Political Organization: Bands, Tribes, Chiefdoms,
and States 223
Challenges to Traditional Political Anthropology 224
How Are Social and Technological Changes Reshaping How People Think
About Family? 319
International Adoptions and the Problem of Cultural Identity 320
In Vitro Fertilization 322
Surrogate Mothers and Sperm Donors 323
13 Religion:
Ritual and Belief 329
How Should We Understand Religion and Religious Beliefs? 331
Understanding Religion, Version 1.0: Edward Burnett Tylor and Belief in Spirits 331
xviii CONTENTS
How and Why Do Doctors and Other Health Practitioners Gain Social
Authority? 366
The Disease–Illness Distinction: Professional and Popular Views of Sickness 367
The Medicalization of the Non-Medical 370
CONTENTS xix
15 Materiality:
Constructing Social Relationships and Meanings with Things 385
Why Is the Ownership of Artifacts from Other Cultures
a Contentious Issue? 388
Questions of Ownership, Rights, and
Protection 389
Cultural Resource Management: Not Just for
Archaeologists 392
Epilogue 412
Glossary 417
References 423
Credits 437
List of Boxes 441
Index 443
Letter from the Authors
Dear Reader,
Imagine how people would react to you if the next time you went to the university
bookstore you tried to haggle at the cash register for your textbooks. Or if the next
time you caught a cold you explained to your friends that you were sick because a
jealous person had hired a witch to cast a spell on you. In both cases, a lot of people
would think you were crazy. But in many societies throughout the world, a lot of
ordinary people would consider you crazy for not haggling or for not explaining your
misfortunes as the workings of a witch.
Issues such as these raise some interesting questions. How do people come to be-
lieve such things? How are such beliefs reflected in and bolstered by individual be-
havior and social institutions in a society? Why do we believe and act in the ways we
do? Such questions are at the core of the study of culture. The idea of culture is one of
anthropology’s most important contributions to knowledge.
The goal of our textbook is to help students develop the ability to pose good an-
thropological questions and begin answering them, our inspiration coming from the
expression “99% of a good answer is a good question.” We present problems and
questions that students will find provocative and contemporary, and then use theo-
ries, ethnographic case studies, and applied perspectives as ways of explaining how
anthropologists have looked at these topics over time. Our approach emphasizes what
is currently known within the study of cultural anthropology and issues that continue
to challenge anthropologists.
Central to the plan of this book are three underlying principles that guide our ap-
proach to cultural anthropology:
Every chapter, every feature of the book has been written with these principles in
mind. We have written a book about anthropology that draws on insights anthropol-
ogists have learned during the twentieth century. At the same time, with its cutting-
edge content and pedagogy, this is a textbook that provides what students need for
the twenty-first century.
For most students, an introductory course in cultural anthropology is the only
educational exposure they will have to anthropological thinking. Most readers are
unlikely to see anthropological thinking as relevant to their own lives unless we find
a way to make it so. This book represents our endeavor to do just that.
Here’s wishing you greater appreciation of cultural anthropology and a lifetime of
cultural revelations to come.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Welsch
Luis A. Vivanco
xxi
About the Authors
Robert L. Welsch currently teaches cultural anthropology at Franklin Pierce Uni-
versity and previously taught for many years at Dartmouth College. He was affiliated
with The Field Museum in Chicago for more than two decades. Trained in the 1970s
at the University of Washington, at a time when anthropologists still focused mainly
on non-Western village-level societies, and when cultural materialist, Marxist, struc-
turalist, and interpretive theories dominated the discipline, Welsch has focused his
research on medical anthropology, religion, exchange, art, and museum studies in the
classic anthropological settings of Papua New Guinea and Indonesia, and the history
of anthropology as a professional discipline. He is Associate Professor of anthropology
at Franklin Pierce University.
Luis A. Vivanco teaches cultural anthropology and global studies at the University
of Vermont, where he has won several of the university’s top teaching awards. He was
trained at Princeton University in the 1990s when post-structuralist perspectives and
“studying up” (studying powerful institutions and bureaucracies, often in Western
contexts) was becoming commonplace. Vivanco has worked in Costa Rica, Mexico,
Colombia, and the United States, studying the culture and politics of environmen-
talist social movements, the media, science, ecotourism, and urban mobility with
bicycles. He is Professor of anthropology and co-director of the Humanities Center
at the University of Vermont.
xxii
Preface
What is cultural anthropology, and how is it relevant in today’s world? Answering
these core questions is the underlying goal of this book.
Cultural anthropology is the study of the social lives of communities, their belief
systems, languages, and social institutions, both past and present. It provides a frame-
work to organize the complexity of human experience and comprehend global cul-
tural processes and practices. The practice of cultural anthropology also provides
knowledge that helps solve human problems today.
ourselves and our students, by strengthening the dialogue between generations and
sub-fields of anthropologists. We endeavor to bring classic anthropological examples,
cases, and analyses to bear on contemporary questions.
Thematic Boxes
Four types of thematic boxes are used throughout the book to highlight key themes
and principles. Classic Contributions boxes consider the history of anthropological
thought on a particular topic and provide follow-up questions to promote critical
analysis. Thinking Like an Anthropologist boxes invite students to exercise their own
anthropological IQ by examining concrete ethnographic situations and formulating
the types of questions that anthropologists typically ask. Doing Fieldwork boxes draw
upon actual field projects to explore the special methods anthropologists have used
to address specific questions and problems. Finally, Anthropologist as Problem Solver
boxes describe cases in which anthropologists have applied disciplinary insights and
methods to help alleviate social problems, mediate conflicts, and (re)define policy
debates. These cases also provide insights into careers that take advantage of an an-
thropology background.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
T. Ch.[371]
This tragicall example was of all the company well liked, howbee
it a doubt was found therein, and that by meanes of the diuersity of
the chronicles: for whereas Hall (whose chronicle in this worke wee
chiefly followed) maketh Mowbrey appellant and Bolinbroke
defendant, Fabian reporteth the matter quite contrary, and that by
record of the parliament roll, wherein it is playne that Bolinbroke was
appellant and Mowbrey defendant.[372] Wherefore whatsoeuer shall
bee sayde here in the person of Mowbrey, (who being a most noble
prince, had too much wrong to bee so causeles defamed after his
death) imagine that to bee spoken agaynst his accuser. Which
matter[373] sith it is more hard to decide than needefull to our
purpose, which minde only to disswade from vices and exalt vertue,
wee referre to such as may come by the recordes of the actes of the
parliament,[374] contented in the meane while with Maister Halle’s
iudgement, which maketh best for[375] our forshewed purpose. This
doubt thus let passe. “I would,” sayde Maister Ferrers, “say
somewhat for king Richard,[376] after whose depriuing, his
brother[377] and diuers others made a maske, minding by king[378]
Henrye’s destruction to haue restored him, which masker’s matter so
runneth in this, that I doubt which ought to goe before, but seeing no
man is ready to say ought in theyr behalfe, I will giue (who so listeth)
leasure to looke[379] therevpon, and in the meane time to furder your
enterprise, I will in king Richarde’s behalfe[380] recount such part of
his story as I thinke most necessary. And therefore imagine Baldwine
that you see the corps of this prince all[381] to be mangled with blewe
woundes, lying pale and wan, all naked vpon the cold stones in[382]
Paule’s church, the people standing round about him, and making
his complaynt in manner as followeth.”[383]
How King Richard the second was for
his euill gouernaunce deposed from
his seate, in the yeare 1399, and
murdered in prison[384] the yeare
following.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
For comming backe this soden stur[432] to stay,
The earle of Worcester whome[433] I trusted moste,
(Whiles I in Wales at Flint my castle[434] lay,
Both to refresh and multiply myne hoste)
There[435] in my hall, in sight of least and most,[436]
His staffe did breake, which was my householde stay,
[437]
Bad ech make shift, and rode himselfe away:
[See princes, see the strength whereof wee bost,
Whom most wee trust, at neede doe vs betray:
Through whose false fayth my land and life I lost.][438]
9.
10.
11.
12.
G. F.[463]
[When hee had[464] ended this so woefull a tragedy,[465] and to
all princes a right worthy[466] instruction, wee paused:[467] hauing
passed through a miserable time full of piteous tragedies. And
seeing the raigne of Henry the fourth ensued, a man[468] more
wary[469] and prosperous in his doings, although not vntroubled with
warres both of outforth and inward enemies, wee began to searche
what peeres[470] were fallen therein, whereof the nombre was not
small: and yet because theyr examples were not much to be noted
for our purpose, we passed ouer al the maskers (of whom king
Richard’s brother was chief) which were all slayn and put to death for
theyr trayterous attempt. And finding Owen Glendour next, one of
fortune’s owne whelpes, and the Percies his confederates, I thought
them vnmeete to be ouerpassed, and[471] therefore sayd thus to the
sylent company: “What my maisters is euery man at once in a
browne study? hath no man affection to any of these stories? you
minde so much some other belike, that these doe not moue you: and
to say the[472] truth, there is no speciall cause why they should.
[473]How be it Owen Glendour, because he was one of fortune’s
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
33.
34.
Th. Ph.[551]
[Whan starued Owen had ended his hungry exhortation, it was
well enough liked, howbeit one founde a doubte[552] worth the
mouing, and that concerning this title, earle of March: for as it
appeareth, there were three men of three diuers nations together in
one time entituled by that honour: first syr Edmund Mortimer, whom
Owen kept in pryson, an Englishman: the second the lord George of
Dunbar, a valiaunt Scot, banished out of his countrey, and well
esteemed of Henry the fouerth: the thirde lord Iames of Bourbon, a
Frenchman, sent by the Frenche king to help Owen Glendour.
These three men had this title all at once, which caused him to
aske how it was true that euery one of these could bee earle of
March: whereto was answered, that euery countrey hath Marches
belonging vnto them, and those so large, that they were earledomes,
and the lords thereof entituled thereby: so the[553] lord Edmund
Mortimer was earle of March in England, lord Iames of Burbon, of
the Marches of Fraunce, and lorde George of Dunbar, earle of the
Marches in Scotland. For otherwise neyther coulde haue interest in
other’s title. This doubt thus dissolued, maister Ferrers sayde: “If no
man haue affection to the Percies, let vs passe the times both of
Henry the fourth and the fift, and come to Henry the sixt, in whose
time fortune (as shee doth in the minority of princes) bare a great
stroke among the nobles. And yet in Henry the fourth’s time are
examples which I would wish, Baldewine, that you should not forget,
as the conspiracy made by the byshop of Yorke, and the lord
Mowbrey, sonne of him whome you late treated of, pricked forwarde
by the earle of Northumberland, father to sir Henry Hotspur, who fled
himselfe, but his parteners were apprehended and put to death, with
Bainton and Blinkinsops, which could not see theyr duty to theyr
king, but tooke parte with Percy, that banished rebell.” As hee was
proceding, hee was desired to stay by one which had pondered the
story of the Percies, who briefly sayde: “To the end, Baldwine, that
you may knowe what to say of the Percies, whose story is not all out
of memory (and is a notable story) I will take vpon mee the person of
the lord Henry Percy,[554] earle of Northumberland, father of sir[555]