Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/330399548
Listening Strategies
CITATIONS READS
2 41,781
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Dat Bao on 16 October 2020.
Second language listening strategies can be defined as the ways in which listeners
manage real‐time interactions with a spoken text to achieve comprehension.
Applying such strategies effectively also involves the ability not only to perform
mental processing but also to know what to do when one fails to comprehend
a text.
Listening strategies can be classified into four main types: cognitive, metacogni-
tive, affective, and social strategies. Cognitive listening strategies refer to all m
ental
abilities and processes related to knowledge (Von Eckardt, 1995), such as applying
linguistic and sociocultural knowledge to resolve the problems. Some examples of
cognitive performance include inferring, predicting, interpreting, storing, and
recalling information, summarizing, translating, repeating, elaborating, resourc-
ing, grouping, note‐taking, substituting, and drawing images. Cognitive strategies
are important for listening comprehension because they help learners monitor and
control their mental processing, identify comprehension break‐downs, and con-
nect world knowledge to listening content.
Metacognitive strategies refer to the ability to understand one’s own method for
learning and assimilating information, that is, thinking about one’s own mental
processes in a learning context (Goh & Taib, 2006). These skills are important
because they play the role of managing and supervising learners’ strategy use, and
for planning, monitoring, and evaluating mental processes and for managing
difficulties during listening. Such manipulation functions help learners define task
objectives and propose strategies for handling them. They direct learners’ atten-
tion to specific aspects of language input, such as discourse markers, content
phrases, and main ideas.
The process of using metacognitive strategies covers the acts of planning, moni-
toring, and evaluating the listening text. Planning refers to how one develops the
awareness of what needs to be done to accomplish a listening task. Monitoring
refers to how listeners can check, verify, and correct comprehension. Evaluating is
about the need to check the results of learners’ listening comprehension against
the internal measure of completeness and accuracy. These acts can be performed
through three stages of listening, including pre‐listening, while‐listening, and
post‐listening.
Affective strategies are concerned with managing emotions that can be either
negative or positive. Negative emotions such as anxiety might cause learners to
feel upset and interfere with listening results, while positive emotions such as
relaxation, enjoyment, and a cohesive sense of community can encourage concen-
tration and peer cooperation. Social strategies, in the meanwhile, refer to learning
by interaction with others, such as appealing for help and asking for confirma-
tion. These two types of listening strategies can be grouped together into
social‐affective listening strategies, which are applied to procure the assistance of
interlocutors to help understanding and to facilitate students to overcome
negative feelings such as anxiety. This practice is also known as the cooperative
listening technique which is often preferred for teaching a group of learners.
The four types of listening strategies, namely cognitive, metacognitive, social, and
affective strategies, serve different aspects of comprehension achievement. This
understanding is based on both scholarly discussion of, and research efforts into,
listening instruction and practice.
Cognitive strategies, which make use of learners’ knowledge in processing
text meaning, provide greater depth of interaction with the text, including the
ability to ignore irrelevant information. Compared with metacognitive strate-
gies, however, these skill types are considered less efficient as they involve lower
processing practices such as translation, repetition, and summary. Within this
awareness, there has been an appeal for more research into the relationship
between learner knowledge and mental translation (Vandergrift, Goh, Mareschal,
& Tafaghodtari, 2006).
Metacognitive strategies, which are considered the most reliable predictors of
listening skills development in metacognition, denote the ability to reflect on and
control one’s own learning. Recent research into metacognition has provided evi-
dence that effective listening performance can happen through classroom instruc-
tion to assist learners’ mental process in coping with listening materials (Rost &
Ross, 1991). Researchers also discover that successful learning comes from the
ability to combine different strategies to meet various tasks and situations (Rahimi
& Katal, 2012) and that more skilled learners tend to apply these types of skills
intensively, especially monitoring comprehension through evaluating information
and questioning for clarification (Alavinia & Mollahossein, 2012).
Social strategies and affective strategies are closely connected and thus often
discussed together. This is because individual feelings and social relationships
are mutually connected parts of the L2 learning process. Empirical studies on
these types are less frequent compared with that on cognitive and metacognitive
strategies. Research on socioaffective ability shows that the lack of social
Pedagogical implications
First, learners need to be aware of their use of strategies and try to improve
strategies for enhancing listening ability. Such awareness maybe directed towards
the sequence of listening, differences between more‐and less‐proficient listeners,
listening strategy instruction, and identification of listening problems. There is
also the need to be equipped with a wide array of skills required for developing
effective listening ability such as word recognition, guessing, comprehending,
body language, conversation responses, language prosody such as rhythm, stress
and intonation, and lip‐reading. Lip‐reading assists learners in connecting ges-
tures with sounds, which, according to (Nunan, 2002) is useful particularly for
listening practice among lower‐level learners.
Second, understanding the text types, genres, and the nature of tasks is also
a necessary step to consider. Teachers should be able to assist learners in devel-
oping appropriate mental and emotional responses to various tasks and
listening focuses. When learners become aware of the nature of such demands,
they will be in a better position to evaluate and manage the requirements of
different tasks.
Third, teachers need to be aware of the negative attitudes and beliefs that learn-
ers hold, which could make progress difficult to achieve, such as expectation of
perfection, self‐perception of low‐ability, awareness of peer pressure, and anxiety
toward failure. Such thinking can be reduced through goal‐directedness, good
attention, background knowledge of the listening content, and recommendation of
appropriate strategies.
Fourth, learners need to be exposed to a wide range of listening materials that
tap into many diverse listening strategies. Such materials should come in a vari-
ety of forms and levels, which may be coupled with teacher and peer input as
well as interaction as an information source in combination with other skills. A
useful method of listening development is extensive listening, which has origi-
nated from extensive reading, an approach that aims to improve a variety of
reading skills through exposure to materials that approximately match profi-
ciency level. It is through exposure to extensive and various listening texts that
learners gain opportunities to practice and refine their listening process, recog-
nize linguistic and lexical features, and increase cultural knowledge related to
the target language.
Finally, a good understanding in students’ interactions with digital media is
helpful in teachers’ decisions toward effective instruction of listening strategies. In
today’s context, where communication technology and business environments
have changed considerably in recent years, multimedia learning environments can
assist second language students in the process of listening comprehension as well
as the awareness of what skills can be employed for listening. For example, the use
of pictorial annotations, that is, associating words with images, can support learn-
ers in the acquisition of new vocabulary that plays a role in comprehension
(Fernández‐Pacheco, 2016).
References
Alavinia, P., & Mollahossein, H. (2012). On the correlation between Iranian EFL learners’
use of metacognitive listening strategies and their emotional intelligence. International
Education Studies, 5(6), 189.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research.
Annual review of applied linguistics, 25, 112–30.
Fernández‐Pacheco, N. N. (2016). Multimodal digital tools and EFL audio‐visual
comprehension: Students’ attitudes towards vodcasts. Language Value, 8(1), 49–76.
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT
Journal, 60(3), 222–32.
Gruba, P. (2006). Playing the videotext: A media literacy perspective on video‐mediated L2
listening. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 77–92.
Jou, Y.‐J. (2010). A study of English listening strategies applied by technological university
students. Journal of TOKO University, 4(2), 1–16.
Kim, J.‐W. (2004). Second language English listening comprehension using different presentations
of pictures and video cues. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of New
South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
McCombs, B. L. (1982). Enhancing student motivation through positive self‐control strategies.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,
Washington, DC.
McCombs, B. L. (1988). Motivational skills training: Combining metacognitive, cognitive,
and affective learning strategies. In E. T. Goetz, C. E. Weinstein, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.),
Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. New York, NY:
Academic Press.
Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. Methodology in language teaching: An
anthology of current practice, 238–41.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ozeki, N. (2000). Listening strategy instruction for female EFL college students in Japan. (Doctoral
thesis: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive listening strategies awareness in learning
English as a foreign language: A comparison between university and high‐school
students. Procedia‐Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 82–9.
Robin, R. (2007). Commentary: Learner‐based listening and technological authenticity.
Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 109–15.
Rost, M., & Ross, S. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachability.
Language learning, 41(2), 235–68.
Serri, F., Boroujeni, A. J., & Hesabi, A. (2012). Cognitive, metacognitive, and social/affective
strategies in listening comprehension and their relationships with individual differences.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 843.
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring
successful strategies. ELT journal, 53(3), 168–76.
Vandergrift, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students through the
process of L2 listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(3), 425–40.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive
awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language learning, 56(3),
431–62.
Von Eckardt, B. (1995). What is cognitive science? Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Suggested Readings
These articles investigate listening strategies in specific cultural contexts, with helpful
recommendations and implications for both students’ learning and future research.
eelt0588.indd 6 stats
View publication 28-12-2018 19:38:46