Geobond LTD.: Contiguous Bored Piled Retaining Wall Design

GEOBOND Ltd.
Page: 1
Project: Newbury Park Mosque, Oaks Lane, ILFORD. IG2 7PL Date: 27/11/2013
Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0
CONTIGUOUS BORED PILED RETAINING WALL DESIGN
FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SUPPORT CONDITIONS
Plus FOUNDATION SUPPORT PILE DESIGNS
AT
PROPOSED NEWBURY PARK MOSQUE, OAKS LANE
ILFORD IG2 7PL
Initial Issue 0 Preliminary Design Calculations for Approval 27/11/2013
Stage Revision Comments Date

GEOBOND Ltd. Page: 2
CONNENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED

2.1 General and Structural Arrangements for the Proposed Development.
2.2 Ground Conditions.
3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS

3.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters.
3.2 Construction Sequence Adopted Within the Design Calculations.
3.3 Structural Design Parameters.
3.4 Retaining Wall and Propping Geometry.
4.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY

4.1 Geotechnical Analysis for the Secant Bored Pile Retaining Wall.
4.2 Individual Retaining Wall and Foundation Pile Structural Analysis.
4.3 Internal Bearing Piles - Axial Load Carrying Requirements
4.4 Internal Bearing Piles – Tensioin Load Carrying Requirements
4.5 Internal Bearing Piles - Lateral Load Carrying Requirements.
4.6 Retaining Wall Piles – Axial Load Carrying Requirements
5.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND GENERAL COMMENTS
5.1 Internal bearing piles

5.2 Retaining wall piles
5.3 Summary
6.0 REFERENCES
APPENDICES
A Selected ‘WALLAP’ SLS and ULS output for the various wall sections considered.
B ‘ADCOL’ outputs for the various reinforcement cages required together with the
in-house designed spread sheet output for the helical shear link reinforcement.
C ‘PILE’ outputs for the axial and tension load capacity calculations.
List of Figures
1. Plan showing the required bored pile retaining wall, the sections considered within the
design.
2. Geotechnical design parameters adopted for the SLS design condition.
3. Geotechnical design parameters adopted for the ULS design condition.
List of Tables
1. Borehole Results
2. Geotechnical Design Parameters
3. Retaining Wall Structural Design Parameters.
4. Temporary / Permanent Propping Structural Design Parameters.
5. Results of Retaining Wall Analysis.
6. Structural Details of Retaiing Wall Piles.
7. Details of Prop Forces.
8. Retaining Wall Axial Load Carrying Capacity Schedule 350mm diameter Piles.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is proposed to construct a new Mosque at a site off Oaks Lane in Newbury Park, Ilford.
The proposed development will comprise the construction of the main Mosque building which will
include a single story basement underneath. Associated with the Mosque development, the site
will be landscaped and dedicated car parking areas will be provided off the Oaks Lane access.
The proposed development is located at the former Salvation Army site situated off Oaks Lane in
Newbury Park, Ilford. The shape of the site is essentially a long, thin rectangle orientated north-
east, south-west with the proposed Mosque positioned in the centre of the site. To the north is the
proposed car parking area whilst to the south, areas of general landscaping are proposed.
Currently the site is overgrown with all above ground structures demolished.
Construction of the new mosque and associated single level basement will require the installation
of a contiguous bored pile retaining wall around the perimeter of the development area to retain
the sides during excavation and construction works. Internal support piles will also be required to
support the basement slab and columns transferring loads from the superstructure above. Line
loads will also be applied to the top of the retaining wall from the above ground superstructure
Information from the ground investigation report indicates that the site is relatively flat and level
with a ground surface level at 50.00m AOD, approximately the same level as the proposed
ground floor slab of the new mosque.
The position of the new basement, the retaining wall required and internal foundation piles are
shown on the site plan, presented on Figure 1. This also shows the section taken for the design
of the contiguous bored pile retaining wall.
These calculations cover the design of the required temporary / permanent contiguous bored pile
retaining wall together with the capacity calculations for the internal foundation support piles.
The calculations have been carried out by Piledesigns Limited on behalf of Geobond Limited.
Figure 1 – Plan showing the required bored pile retaining wall and the sections considered.
Extract of Drawing No 11193/101 Rev B – Foundation, Basement Floor & Ground Floor Plans
2.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED
2.1 General and Structural Arrangements for the Proposed Development
Details of the proposed retaining walls and foundation piles have been taken from the drawings
provided, which are from Sayeed Ali, Chartered Structural Engineer for the project under the
project reference number 11193.
The main drawings that have been consulted in preparing these calculations can be
summarised as follows;
• 11196 / 101 Rev B – Foundation, Basement Floor & Ground Floor Plans
• 11193 / 103 Rev B - Typical Sections
All relevant drawings relating to the piling works are marked as ‘For Pricing Only’ and
Construction Issue drawings must be issued before piling works commence on site.
The following Piling Platform Levels (PPL’s) will be provided by the Main Contractor;
• Contiguous Bored Pile Retaining Wall
Along the line of the required wall PPL = 50.00m AOD
• Foundation Bearing Piles
Within the plan area of the building PPL = 50.00m AOD.
One wall section has been identified for this analysis, labelled A, and has been indicated on the
location plan for the retaining wall, Figure 1. The section has been chosen to represent the
general soil and structural criteria which is applicable to the requirements of the retaining wall.
Section A
The retaining wall extends around the perimeter of the basement in a generally open area with
no houses or significant structures adjacent or nearby. Therefore, one section is considered
appropriate for the design of the retaining wall.
Within the design an allowance of 10kN/m² has been allowed as a general ground level
surcharge to cater for the presence of plant and machinery during the temporary construction
phase and for later car parking / deliveries etc., during the permanent in used phase. For the
temporary phase during construction, it has been assumed that safety barriers will be installed
around the open excavation such that the surcharge loading does not encroach closer than
1.0m from the edge of the retaining wall. In the permanent condition the surcharge has been
extended to the back edge of the retaining wall.
It has also been assumed that as a matter of good practice the capping beam to the piles will be
cast and cured before the bulk of the basement is excavated.
2.2 Ground Conditions
Ground conditions have been taken from a “site investigation” carried out by Herts and Essex Site
Investigations reference No CSG/10518, dated 23rd November 2011. The information contains
the records of seven driven in ‘windowless sample’ boreholes taken to a maximum depth of 5.0m
from existing ground level.
Within the borehole regular disturbed bulk bag samples were obtained with two ‘Undisturbed’
samples taken in the more cohesive deposits. Laboratory testing of the ‘undisturbed’ samples
indicated that they had been significantly affected during the sampling with the results not
considered to be realistic.
Ground level for the boreholes has been assumed to be 50.00m AOD.
The borehole showed the ground conditions to comprise a general covering of Made Ground
overlying sandy gravel with occasional clay lenses typical of the Boyn Hill Gravel Deposits.
Beneath the Gravel deposits, London Clay was encountered and proved to the full depth of the
borehole where encountered.
A summary of the borehole result is presented in Table 1
Table 1: Borehole Results

Borehole / Estimated
Probe No Elevation top of strata
(m AOD)
Made Boyn Hill Gravel London Lowest Level
Ground Deposits CLAY Penetrated
1 50.00 47.00
2 50.00 47.00
3 50.00 47.50 46.50 46.00
4 50.00 47.50 46.60 45.00
5 50.00 47.50 46.50 46.00
6 50.00 48.60 48.00
7 50.00 48.60 48.00
Groundwater was encountered as definite strike within the Boyn Hill Gravel Deposits in 3 of the 7
boreholes drilled. In all cases the groundwater was struck at 3.00m depth (approx. 47.00m AOD)
with fast inflows recorded. Standing water levels recorded after a period of 5 minutes varied from
2.60m to 2.50m depth (approx. 47.40 to 47.50m AOD)
Due to the non - consistent encounters of groundwater within the gravel deposits across the site it
is suspected that a perched groundwater table exists within the gravel deposits overlying the
more impermeable London Clay. Although groundwater was encountered above the excavation
level of the proposed basement, the design proposed by the Structural Engineer does not seem
to have allowed for any specific groundwater protection measures. Therefore, for the purposes of
designing the contiguous bored pile retaining wall a groundwater level of 45.60m AOD (typically
the underside of the pile caps) has been assumed for design purposes.
The site investigation information provided is insufficient to enable a full design to be undertaken
due to the limited depth of the investigation window borehole and the lack of sufficient in-situ and
laboratory testing on recovered samples. It has therefore been necessary to refer to adjacent
ground investigations where present and historical information regarding the geotechnical
properties of the ground conditions encountered.
3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS
3.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters
The pile design calculations have been based on the information provided. The soil parameters
employed have generally been taken from the information provided, but also supplemented
where necessary from published data and other ground investigation reports in the area. The
analysis has considered un-drained conditions for the cohesive deposits and drained conditions
for the granular deposits when applied to the temporary condition. For the permanent condition,
all soil types have been changed to the drained condition where applicable.
Table 2 presents a summary of the geotechnical design parameters for each soil used in the
design of the retaining wall and foundation piles. For each soil the SLS and ULS, drained and
un-drained conditions have been indicated. Further details on how these design parameters are
obtained are given in Section 4.1 of this report.
The sections presented on Figures 3 and 4 presents the typical soil profile used in the analysis.
Groundwater for all the cases considered has been taken at an elevation of 45.60m AOD.
Table 2 Geotechnical Design Parameters
Soil Type SLS Parameters ULS Parameters

Fs = 1.0 Fs = 1.5 Un-drained, 1.2 Drained
Bulk Density (γ) = 18kN/m Bulk Density (γ) = 18kN/m

3 3
Made Ground
(Granular, Drained) Ø’ = 30° Ø’ = 25°
50.00 – 47.50m AOD E’ = 10 000kN/m² E’ = 8 333kN/m²
Poisson’s Ratio (η) = 0.2 Poisson’s Ratio (η) = 0.2
K0 = 0.500 K0 = 0.577
Tan δa’/Tan Ø’ = 0.666 Tan δa’/Tan Ø’ = 0.666
Tan δp’/Tan Ø’ = 0.500 Tan δp’/Tan Ø’ = 0.500

3 3
Boyn Hill Gravel
(Granular, Drained) SPT ‘N’ = 15, Ø’ = 32° Ø’ = 26.67°
47.50 – 46.50m AOD E’ = 3000 ‘N’ = 45 000kN/m² E’ = 37 500kN/m²
K0 = 0.470 K0 = 0.551
Tan δa’/Tan Ø’ = 0.666 Tan δa’/Tan Ø’ = 0.666
Tan δp’/Tan Ø’ = 0.500 Tan δp’/Tan Ø’ = 0.500

3 3
Weathered London Clay
(Cohesive, Un-drained) Cu at 46.50m AOD = 100 kN/m² Cu at 46.50m AOD = 66.7kN/m²
46.50 + m AOD δCu / δz = 11 kN/m²/m δCu / δz = 7.34kN/m²/m
Eu = 600 Cu = 60 000 kN/m² Eu = 600 Cu = 40 020kN/m²
δEu / δz = 6 600 kN/m²/m δEu / δz = 4 404 kN/m²/m
K0 = 1.3 K0 = 1.3

3 3
Weathered London Clay
(Cohesive, Drained) E’ = 0.77 Eu E’ = 0.77 Eu
46.50 + m AOD E’ = 0.77 x 60 000 = 46 200 kN/m² E’ = 0.77 x 40 020 = 30 815 kN/m²
δE’ / δz = 5 082 kN/m²/m δE’ / δz = 3 391 kN/m²/m
Ø’ = 25° Ø’ = 20.83°
Weathered London Clay C’ = 0.0 kN/m² C’ = 0.0 kN/m²

(Cohesive, Drained) Tan δa’/Tan Ø’ = 0.666 Tan δa’/Tan Ø’ = 0.666
46.50 + m AOD Tan δp’/Tan Ø’ = 0.500 Tan δp’/Tan Ø’ = 0.500
(Continued) K0 = 1.3 K0 = 1.3
GEOBOND Ltd. Page : 13
Newbury Park Mosque, Oaks Lane, ILFORD. IG2 7PL Date : 27/11/2013
Design By: JBP Project Ref: 14867 Revision : 0
Typical Section For SLS (Serviceability Limit State) Conditions (Bending / Shear)
(Unfactored Soil Strengths, no alowance for overdig)
PASSIVE ACTIVE
Piling Platform Level = EGL (50.00m AOD)
MADE GROUND
Drained Parameters
Φ' = 30°
c' = 0 kN/m²
γ = 18kN/m³
47.50m AOD
Boyn Hill GRAVEL
Drained Parameters
Φ' = 32°
c' = 0 kN/m²
γ = 19kN/m³
46.50m AOD
Underside of Basement Slab = 46.0m AOD London CLAY
London CLAY Undrained Parameters

Cu = 100kN/m² + 11.0kN/m²/m
Undrained Parameters
Cu = 100kN/m² + 11.0kN/m²/m Drained Parameters
Φ' = 25°
Drained Parameters c' = 0 kN/m²
Φ' = 25°
c' = 0 kN/m² γ = 20kN/m³
γ = 20kN/m³
Notes:
GWL taken as 46.50m AOD
Not to Scale
GEOBOND Ltd. Page : 14
Design By: JBP Project Ref: 14867 Revision : 0
Typical Section For ULS (Ultimate Limit State) Conditions (stability / embedment)
(Factored Soil Strengths, 0.5m allowance for overdig)
PASSIVE ACTIVE
Piling Platform Level = EGL (50.00m AOD)
MADE GROUND
Drained Parameters
Φ' = 25°
c' = 0 kN/m²
γ = 18kN/m³
47.50m AOD
Boyn Hill GRAVEL
Drained Parameters
Φ' = 26.67°
c' = 0 kN/m²
γ = 19kN/m³
46.50m AOD
Underside of Basement Slab = 46.0m AOD London CLAY
London CLAY Undrained Parameters

Cu = 66.70kN/m² + 7.34kN/m²/m
Undrained Parameters
Cu = 66.70kN/m² + 7.34kN/m²/m Drained Parameters
Φ' = 20.83°
Drained Parameters c' = 0 kN/m²
Φ' = 20.83°
c' = 0 kN/m² γ = 20kN/m³
γ = 20kN/m³
Notes:
GWL taken as 46.50m AOD
Not to Scale
3.2 Construction Sequence Adopted Within the Design Calculations.
The construction sequence adopted for the retaining wall has been assumed to be as follows
Contiguous Bored Piles (PPL = 50.00m AOD)
• Apply external surcharges.

• Install bored piles and cast capping beam to all piles.
• Excavate to 46.00m AOD SLS conditions, (45.40m AOD ULS conditions)
• Cast lower basement slab at 46.15m AOD. (Slab to act as a prop in both the temporary
and permanent condition)
• Cast ground floor slab at 49.66m AOD. (Slab to act as a prop in both the temporary and
permanent condition).
• Apply remaining external surcharges.
• END OF TEMPORARY DESIGN CONDITIONS
• Change soil parameters to long term conditions.
• Change concrete to long term conditions
• END OF PERMANENT DESIGN CONDITIONS
The above construction sequence must be followed exactly as any deviation could result in piles
becoming overstressed.
3.3 Structural Design Parameters
The contiguous bored pile retaining wall piles will be constructed using a C35 designed concrete
pump mix and ‘B’ (500N/mm²) grade main reinforcement bars with ‘B’ grade helical shear links.
A minimum of 50 mm cover to the main reinforcement will be provided by propriety spacers.
The main structural design parameters used in the retaining wall analysis have been
summarized in Table 3,
Table 3 – Structural Retaining Wall Design Parameters
MATERIAL SHORT TERM PARAMETERS LONG TERM PARAMETERS
Concrete E= 2.8 x 10+7 kN/m² E= 1.40 x 10+7 kN/m²
350mm Ø I = 0.00163696 m4/m run I = 0.00163693 m4/m run
450mm centres EI = 45 835 kN/m²/m EI = 22 917 kN/m²/m
Steel E= 2.05 x 10+8 kN/m² E= 2.05 x 10+8 kN/m²

3.4 RETAINING WALL AND PROPPING GEOMETRY
The retaining wall has been designed as a free cantilever in the temporary condition with
permanent propping consisting of the structural basement and ground floor slabs of the proposed
building.
Table 4 presents the structural and geometrical properties of the propping that has been used in
the design of the retaining wall.
Table 4: Permanent Propping Structural Design Parameters.
Prop No Prop Prop Prop Prop Young’s Prop

Elevation Spacing Sectional modulus free length
area (kN/m²)
(Temp/Perm) (m AOD) (m) (m²) (m)
+7
1 (Perm) 46.150 1.00 0.450 1.40 x 10 5.00
2 (Perm) 49.660 1.00 0.300 1.40 x 10+7 5.00
Should the construction sequence or propping system be changed from that assumed then the
retaining wall design will need to be reassessed which could result in changes to the pile length
and / or reinforcement.
4.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY
4.1 Geotechnical Analysis for the Secant Bored Pile Retaining Wall
The stability analysis has been carried out using the computer program ‘WALLAP’ Version 6.05,
developed by Geosolve.
The input and output data from the analyses are presented in Appendix A. Two sets of WALLAP
runs were carried out for each wall section considered, namely one for ULS (Ultimate Limit State)
conditions to check overall wall stability for the embedment length given with the other analysis
for SLS (Serviceability Limit State) conditions to calculate the induced bending moments and
shear forces.
The ULS calculations have been based on the 'Strength Factor' method, with factor M' set to 1.5
for un-drained parameters and 1.2 for drained parameters. These are in accordance with British
Standard, BS8002 (1994) and CIRIA report reference C580 (2003). This first analysis is mainly
to verify that the proposed embedment length, i.e. reinforced toe level, provides a nominal factor
of safety against failure. Bending and shear forces are un-factored in any subsequent structural
calculations. An allowance for over dig within the excavation of 10% (0.5m maximum) of the
retained height (or below a temporary prop where employed) has also been taken into account.
The SLS calculations have assumed moderately conservative soil parameters using a 'Strength
factor' of 1.0 and no allowance for possible over dig. This second calculation is to determine the
factored bending and shear forces for any subsequent structural calculations and to determine
the anticipated wall deflections.
Reinforcement calculations are based on the worst case bending moments and shear values
determined from the factored ULS and un-factored SLS calculations as indicated in Table 5 and
summarized in the wall reinforcement schedule, Table 6. Temporary and permanent prop forces
have been summarized in Table 7.
Details of the soil input values used in the analyses and output results are presented within the
WALLAP printouts, Appendix A.
Calculated wall displacements and corresponding program outputs may be considered to be an

upper bound estimate of long-term movements, due to the following factors:
(a) Geotechnical parameters, pile stiffness and surcharges are considered to be reasonably
conservative values. A more accurate assessment of wall displacements would require
the input of 'actual' parameters to be obtained from more sophisticated laboratory testing.
(b) The computer program does not consider the beneficial effects of structural elements such
as a capping beam in this instance.
(c) The computer program is a two-dimensional analysis program and does not consider the
beneficial effects of geometrical features such as internal or external wall corners which
increase its overall stiffness.
(d) The computer program uses a Winkler spring analysis to determine the wall
displacements, in which springs are used to represent a continuum and there is no
transfer of shear stresses between springs. In general, the application of this concept
leads to an overestimation of structural deformations; hence the resulting displacements
may be over-predicted.
4.2 Individual Retaining Wall and Foundation Pile Structural Analysis.
Reinforcement requirements have been analysed for the sheer forces and bending moments
indicated within the WALLAP outputs (Appendix A) and summarized in the wall schedule, (Table
4). The Oasys software program ‘ADCOL’ has been employed for this purpose and all bending
moments and shear force calculations have been carried out in accordance with BS 8110.
Helical shear reinforcement details have been calculated from an in house designed spread
sheet which calculates the shear reinforcement in accordance with BS 8110.
The results of the ‘ADCOL’ analyses together with the helical reinforcement spread sheet results
are given in Appendix B. For all cases the concrete grade has been taken as C35 and a worst
case axial load of 0kN considered.
Table 5 – Results of Retaining Wall Analysis
Wall Pile Pile Calculated SLS Results SLS Results ULS Results ULS Results Ultimate Design values
Section Diameter Spacing Deflection Bending Moments Shear Bending Moments Shear Per pile at spacing
(mm) (SLS) Maximum Ultimate Maximum Ultimate Maximum Ultimate Maximum Ultimate Given
x1.35 x1.35 x1.0 x1.0 Moment Shear
(mm) (approx.) (mm) (kNm/m) (kNm/m) (kN/m) (kN/m) (kNm/m) (kNm/m) (kN/m) (kN/m) (kNm) (kN)
A 350 450 17.0 84.6 114.2 71.1 96.0 121.2 121.2 79.6 79.6 55 44
Notes:
Table 6 – Details of Retaining Wall Piles (Stability criteria only)
Wall Pile Pile Assumed Retaining Retaining Reinforcement

Section Diameter Spacing Piling Wall Pile Wall Pile Main Bars Helical
Level Length Toe Level
No Size Length Size @ Spacing
(mm) (mm) (m AOD) (m) (m AOD) (mm) (m) (mm) @ (mm)
A 350 500 50.00 8.00 42.00 4 B 20 8.0 B8 175
Notes:
Retaining wall reinforcement lengths are for stability criteria only.
Wall Section A - 50mm cover to reinforcement

Table 7 – Details of Prop Forces
Wall Prop Purpose of Level of Prop SLS Results ULS Results

Section Ref Prop Prop Force Prop Force
Un factored Un factored
Temp / Perm Temp / Perm
(Temp/Perm) (m AOD) (kN/m run) (kN/m run)
1 (Perm) 46.15 129 151
A
2 (Perm) 49.66 4 5
Notes: Propping forces are given for information only

4.3 Internal Bearing Piles - Axial Load Carrying Requirements
Calculations for vertical pile capacities have been carried out using the CADS software program
‘Pile’ version 1.09 using bored piles employing 350mm diameter piles
The axial pile design has been based on the following soil profile based on a piling platform level
of 50.00m AOD
PPL to U/S of pile cap (45.40m AOD) Ignored
45.40 AOD to Depth London CLAY
Groundwater has been taken as being at an elevation of 45.60m AOD
For piles designed in cohesive deposits an un drained approach is accepted as being the most
appropriate when calculating the ultimate shaft and end bearing values. Groundwater is not
considered within the calculations. However, for granular deposits a drained approach is
accepted as being the most appropriate when calculating the ultimate shaft and end bearing
values. Groundwater, when applicable, is considered in the calculations.
Shaft Adhesion / Friction
Above Formation Level Ignored for positive shaft friction.
In Cohesive Deposits Use Qs = α x Cu’ x As
Where α = adhesion factor, usually taken to be 0.6

in London Clay.
.
Cu’ = average undrained shear strength over
the section of pile considered.
As = Surface area of the pile shaft over the

length of pile being considered.
In Granular Deposits Use Qs = Ks x pd’ x Tan δ x As
Where Ks = coefficient of earth pressure at rest,

taken as 0.8 for CFA piles in granular
deposits
pd’ = average effective overburden pressure
Tan δ = angle of friction between concrete

and soil, taken as Tan φ’ for bored piles in
granular soils where φ’ is the angle of
shearing resistance for the soil;
As = Surface area of the pile shaft over the

length of pile being considered.
End Bearing
For Cohesive Deposits Use Qb = Nc x Cub x AB
Where Nc = bearing capacity factor. For undrained

cohesive deposits usually taken as 9.0.
Cub = undrained shear strength at the base

of the pile.
Ab = base surface area of the pile.
For Granular Deposits Use Qb = pd’ x Nq x Ab
Where pd’ = effective overburden pressure at pile

toe level.
Nq = bearing capacity factor related to the

angle of shearing resistance.
Ab = Base surface area of the pile.
Factors of Safety
A global factor of safety of 3.0 has been employed when determining the allowable axial working
load of the internal bearing piles. For the retaining wall piles a global factor of safety of 3.0 has
been adopted (Refer to Section 4.6 for additional details).
Calculations for the vertical pile capacity using the bearing pile software ‘PILE’ are presented in
Appendix C.
The indicated internal pile load for the internal bearing piles has been given as 350kN (for
pricing purposes). From the calculations presented in Appendix C the required pile toe level is
35.50m AOD or a pile length of (50.00 – 35.50) = 14.50m.
4.4 Internal Bearing Piles - Tension Load Capacity Calculations
There is no requirement for the internal bearing piles to resist any tension loadings
4.5 Internal Bearing Piles - Lateral Load Capacity Calculations
There is no requirement for the internal bearing piles to resist any lateral loadings
4.6 Retaining Wall Piles – Axial Load Capacity Requirements
The retaining wall piles are required to carry axial point loads and line loads from the building
above. The maximum line load has been given as being 180kN/m run which for a pile spacing of
0.45m gives a load per pile of 81kN per pile.
For contiguous piles in a retaining wall that are required to carry an axial load, a reduction factor
is usually applied to the calculated working capacity to take into account the close centres of the
piles. In the retaining wall required at this site two 350mm diameter piles will be installed at
450mm centres.,
For 350mm diameter piles installed at 450mm centres consider the surface area per metre depth
to be 0.90m², i.e. the wall is considered to be straight sided (2 x 0.45m pile spacing). Relating this
to the surface area of an isolated 350mm diameter pile (1.099m² per m depth), the reduction
factor in surface area is determined to be 0.82. No reduction factor is required for the end bearing
since the surface area of a rectangular area of (0.35 x 0.45) is 0.157m² which is greater than the
base surface area of an isolated 350mm diameter pile (0.096m²).
To calculate the allowable working load of an individual retaining wall pile, the pile design
calculation for the bearing piles with a cut off level of 45.40m AOD has been employed (the same
calculation as used for the internal bearing piles). The ultimate figures calculated by the software
have then been input into a spread sheet to produce factored allowable working capacities. For
all the wall piles a global factor of safety of 3.0 has been adopted.
Table 8 presents the allowable working loads for retaining wall piles of 350mm diameter. From
Table 8 it can be seen that the required minimum pile toe level of 42.00m AOD provides an
adjusted axial pile capacity of 110 kN per pile with is sufficient for the maximum indicated
retaining wall pile load of 81kN per pile.
GEOBOND Ltd TABLE 8
Page : 25
Design By: Project Ref: 14867 Revision : 0
Retaining Wall Piles 350mm dia - Axail Load Design Calculations
Elevation Ult Shaft Factored Ult End Factored Total Factored Safe
m AOD Resistance Shaft Res Resistance End Res Resistance Resistance
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) FOS=3.0
45.40 0 0 97 97 97 32
45.00 25 21 101 101 122 41
44.50 58 48 106 106 154 51
44.00 92 75 110 110 185 62
43.50 128 105 115 115 220 73
43.00 165 135 120 120 255 85
42.50 204 167 125 125 292 97
42.00 244 200 129 129 329 110
41.50 286 235 134 134 369 123
41.00 329 270 139 139 409 136
40.50 374 307 144 144 451 150
40.00 421 345 148 148 493 164
39.50 469 385 153 153 538 179
39.00 518 425 158 158 583 194
38.50 569 467 163 163 630 210
38.00 621 509 167 167 676 225
37.50 675 554 172 172 726 242
37.00 731 599 177 177 776 259
36.50 788 646 182 182 828 276
36.00 846 694 187 187 881 294
35.50 906 743 191 191 934 311
Notes:
Minimum pile length for retaining wall function = 8.00m, toe level = 42.00m AOD
For a toe level of 42.00m AOD the axial capacity of a retaining wall pile is 110kN
For a line load of 180kN/m run = (180 x 0.45) = 81kN per pile. Therefore min pile length OK
For a line load of 75kN/m run = (75 x 0.45) = 34kN per pile. Therefore min pile length OK
5.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND GENERAL COMMENTS
5.1 Internal Bearing Piles.
The indicated pile loads for the internal bearing piles has been given as 350kN (for pricing
purposes only) and are not expected to significantly change in the final design. From the
calculations presented in Appendix C, the required pile toe level is 35.50m AOD or a pile length
of 14.50m when measured from the Piling Platform Level of 50.00m AOD. Reinforcement to the
piles will comprise 4 No B20mm bars extending 8.0m below ground level to an elevation of
42.0m AOD or 3.40m below pile cut off level. Shear reinforcement will be B 8 helical bent to a
pitch of 175mm. The internal piles are essentially tied together by the pile caps so only nominal
reinforcement is required to structurally connect the piles into the pile cap.
5.2 Retaining Wall Piles
The retaining wall piles will be constructed to a toe level of 42.00m AOD from a piling platform
level of 50.00m AOD, a pile length of 8.0m. Reinforcement will comprise 4 No B 20mm bars
extending the full length of the piles or 8.0m. Shear reinforcement will be B 8 helical bent to a
pitch of 175mm. The required pile length for stability considerations provides sufficient axial load
capacity to resist the indicated line loads to be supported by the wall.
5.3 Summary
Summary result of the retaining wall stability analysis is presented in Table 5. The pile summary
schedule indicating required pile lengths and reinforcement is presented in Table 6 whilst
temporary and permanent prop forces are presented in Table 7. Table 8 presents the allowable
axial loads that can be resisted by the retaining wall.
The detailed retaining wall analysis comprising the computer print outs from ‘WALLAP’ are
presented in Appendix A.
Reinforcement calculations comprising the computer printouts from the ‘ADCOL’ design
software and in-house designed link reinforcement spread sheet are presented in Appendix B.
Axial capacity calculations comprising the computer printouts from the ‘PILE’ design software
are presented in Appendix C
REFERENCES:
(1) BS 8002: 1994. Code of practice for earth retaining structures

(2) BS 8004: 1986. Code of practice for foundations
(3) BS 8110 – 1: 1997 (Rev.2005)
(4) CIRIA C580 (2003). Embedded retaining walls – guidance for economic design.
GEOBOND Ltd. APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
Ref No Description
A-ULS WALLAP analysis for wall section A, stability and embedment.

A-SLS WALLAP analysis for wall section A, moments and deflection.
WALLAP analysis for wall section A, (ULS) stability and embedment.

| Sheet No. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS
Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867 Density of water = 10.00 kN/m3
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP Active side Passive side
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - ULS | Initial water table elevation 45.60 45.60
Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked : Automatic water pressure balancing at toe of wall : No
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units: kN,m
INPUT DATA WALL PROPERTIES
Type of structure = Fully Embedded Wall
SOIL PROFILE Elevation of toe of wall = 42.00
Stratum Elevation of ------------------ Soil types ------------------- Maximum finite element length = 0.40 m
no. top of stratum Active side Passive side Youngs modulus of wall E = 2.8000E+07 kN/m2
1 50.00 11 Made Ground ULS (D) 11 Made Ground ULS (D) Moment of inertia of wall I = 1.6370E-03 m4/m run
2 47.50 12 Boyn Gracel ULS(D) 12 Boyn Gracel ULS(D) E.I = 45835 kN.m2/m run
3 46.50 13 London Clay ULS (U) 13 London Clay ULS (U) Yield Moment of wall = Not defined
SOIL PROPERTIES STRUTS and ANCHORS

Bulk Young's At rest Consol Active Passive Strut/ X-section Inclin Pre-
-- Soil type -- density Modulus coeff. state. limit limit Cohesion anchor Strut area Youngs Free -ation stress Tension
No. Description kN/m3 Eh,kN/m2 Ko NC/OC Ka Kp kN/m2 no. Elev. spacing of strut modulus length (degs) /strut allowed
(Datum elev.) (dEh/dy ) (dKo/dy) ( Nu ) ( Kac ) ( Kpc ) ( dc/dy ) m sq.m kN/m2 m kN
1 Made Ground 18.00a 10000 0.500 OC 0.284 4.369 1 46.15 1.00 0.450000 1.400E+07 5.00 0.00 0 No
SLS (D) 19.00b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) 2 49.66 1.00 0.300000 1.400E+07 5.00 0.00 0 No
2 Boyn Gravel 19.00a 45000 0.470 OC 0.260 4.964
SLS (D) 19.50b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) SURCHARGE LOADS
3 London Cl.. 20.00 60000 1.300 OC 1.000 1.000 100.0u Surch Distance Length Width Surcharge Equiv. Partial
( 46.50 ) ( 6600) (0.490) (2.000) ( 2.000) ( 11.00) -arge from parallel perpend. ----- kN/m2 ----- soil factor/
4 London Cl.. 20.00 46200 1.300 OC 0.351 3.277 0.0d no. Elev. wall to wall to wall Near edge Far edge type Category
( 46.50 ) ( 5082) (0.200) (1.391) ( 4.884) 1 50.00 1.00(A) 10.00 10.00 10.00 = N/A N/A
5 Not defined 2 50.00 0.00(A) 10.00 1.00 10.00 = N/A N/A
6 Not defined
7 Not defined Note: A = Active side, P = Passive side
8 Not defined
9 Not defined CONSTRUCTION STAGES
10 Not defined Construction Stage description
11 Made Ground 18.00a 8333 0.577 OC 0.351 3.253 stage no. --------------------------------------------------------
ULS (D) 19.00b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) 1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elevation 50.00
12 Boyn Gracel 19.00a 37500 0.551 OC 0.327 3.578 2 Excavate to elevation 45.60 on PASSIVE side
ULS(D) 19.50b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) 3 Fill to elevation 46.00 on PASSIVE side with soil type 12
13 London Cl.. 20.00 40020 1.300 OC 1.000 1.000 66.70u 4 Install strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 46.15
( 46.50 ) ( 4404) (0.490) (2.000) ( 2.000) ( 7.340) 5 Install strut or anchor no.2 at elevation 49.66
14 London Cl.. 20.00 30815 1.300 OC 0.419 2.597 0.0d 6 Apply surcharge no.2 at elevation 50.00
( 46.50 ) ( 3391) (0.200) (1.528) ( 4.198) 7 Change properties of soil type 13 to soil type 14
Ko pressures will not be reset
Note: (a) and (b) are Bulk Densities above and below the water table 8 Change EI of wall to 20625 kN.m2/m run
Yield moment not defined
Additional soil parameters associated with Ka and Kp No adjustments to wall displacements
--- parameters for Ka --- --- parameters for Kp ---
Soil Wall Back- Soil Wall Back- FACTORS OF SAFETY and ANALYSIS OPTIONS
------- Soil type ------- friction adhesion fill friction adhesion fill
No. Description angle coeff. angle angle coeff. angle Stability analysis:
1 Made Ground SLS (D) 30.00 0.666 0.00 30.00 0.500 0.00 Method of analysis - Strength Factor method
2 Boyn Gravel SLS (D) 32.00 0.666 0.00 32.00 0.500 0.00 Factor on soil strength for calculating wall depth = 1.00
3 London Clay SLS (U) 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00
4 London Clay SLS (D) 25.00 0.666 0.00 25.00 0.520 0.00 Parameters for undrained strata:
5 Not defined Minimum equivalent fluid density = 5.00 kN/m3
6 Not defined Maximum depth of water filled tension crack = 0.00 m
7 Not defined
8 Not defined Bending moment and displacement calculation:
9 Not defined Method - Subgrade reaction model using Influence Coefficients
10 Not defined Open Tension Crack analysis? - No
11 Made Ground ULS (D) 25.00 0.666 0.00 25.00 0.500 0.00 Non-linear Modulus Parameter (L) = 0 m
12 Boyn Gracel ULS(D) 26.67 0.666 0.00 26.67 0.500 0.00
13 London Clay ULS (U) 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 Boundary conditions:
14 London Clay ULS (D) 20.83 0.666 0.00 20.83 0.500 0.00 Length of wall (normal to plane of analysis) = 1000.00 m
Width of excavation on active side of wall = 20.00 m

Width of excavation on passive side of wall = 20.00 m
Distance to rigid boundary on active side = 20.00 m

Distance to rigid boundary on passive side = 20.00 m
OUTPUT OPTIONS | Sheet No.
Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867
Stage ------ Stage description ----------- ------- Output options ------- Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP
no. Displacement Active, Graph. Data filename/Run ID: Section A - ULS |
Bending mom. Passive output Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013
Shear force pressures Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked :
1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 50.00 No No No -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Excav. to elev. 45.60 on PASSIVE side No No No Units: kN,m
3 Fill to elev. 46.00 on PASSIVE side Yes No Yes
4 Install strut no.1 at elev. 46.15 No No No
6 Apply surcharge no.2 at elev. 50.00 No No No
7 Change soil type 13 to soil type 14 No No No
8 Change EI of wall to 20625kN.m2/m run Yes No Yes
* Summary output Yes - Yes
Program WALLAP - Copyright (C) 2012 by DL Borin, distributed by GEOSOLVE

69 Rodenhurst Road, London SW4, UK. Tel: +44 20 8674 7251
| Sheet No. | Sheet No.
Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867 Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - ULS | Data filename/Run ID: Section A - ULS |
Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013 Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked : Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units: kN,m Units: kN,m
Stage No. 3 Fill to elevation 46.00 on PASSIVE side with soil type 12
STABILITY ANALYSIS of Fully Embedded Wall according to Strength Factor method

Factor of safety on soil strength
FoS for toe Toe elev. for

elev. = 42.00 FoS = 1.000
--------------- -------------
Stage --- G.L. --- Strut Factor Moment Toe Wall
No. Act. Pass. Elev. of equilib. elev. Penetr
Safety at elev. -ation
3 50.00 46.00 Cant. 1.713 42.85 43.42 2.58
BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Fully Embedded Wall

Analysis options
Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00m
Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients
Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached
Open Tension Crack analysis - No
Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall

Passive side 20.00 from wall
Node Y Nett Wall Wall Shear Bending Strut EI of

no. coord pressure disp. rotation force moment forces wall
kN/m2 m rad. kN/m kN.m/m kN/m kN.m2/m
1 50.00 0.00 0.037 7.39E-03 0.0 0.0 45835
2 49.66 2.20 0.035 7.39E-03 0.4 0.1 45835
3 49.43 3.80 0.033 7.39E-03 1.1 0.2 45835
4 49.20 5.47 0.032 7.39E-03 2.1 0.6 45835
5 48.80 8.42 0.029 7.38E-03 4.9 1.9 45835
6 48.40 11.33 0.026 7.35E-03 8.9 4.7 45835
7 48.00 14.16 0.023 7.29E-03 14.0 9.2 45835
8 47.75 15.91 0.021 7.23E-03 17.7 13.1 45835
9 47.50 17.63 0.019 7.14E-03 21.9 18.1 45835
16.66 0.019 7.14E-03 21.9 18.1
10 47.25 18.43 0.017 7.03E-03 26.3 24.1 45835
11 47.00 20.18 0.016 6.88E-03 31.1 31.3 45835
12 46.75 21.91 0.014 6.68E-03 36.4 39.7 45835
13 46.50 23.63 0.012 6.44E-03 42.1 49.5 45835
18.78 0.012 6.44E-03 42.1 49.5
14 46.15 20.86 0.010 6.00E-03 49.0 65.4 45835
15 46.00 21.76 0.009 5.77E-03 52.2 73.0 45835
16 45.60 21.66 0.007 5.04E-03 60.9 95.6 45835
-127.51 0.007 5.04E-03 60.9 95.6
17 45.20 -111.03 0.005 4.13E-03 13.2 112.0 45835
18 44.80 -78.00 0.004 3.16E-03 -24.6 111.6 45835
19 44.40 -35.97 0.003 2.25E-03 -47.4 95.5 45835
20 44.00 -5.83 0.002 1.52E-03 -55.8 73.6 45835
21 43.60 14.36 0.001 9.77E-04 -54.1 50.9 45835
22 43.20 27.23 0.001 6.23E-04 -45.8 30.4 45835
23 42.80 35.52 0.001 4.28E-04 -33.2 14.2 45835
24 42.40 41.63 0.001 3.50E-04 -17.8 3.8 45835
25 42.00 47.27 0.001 3.33E-04 0.0 0.0 ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage No. 8 Change EI of wall to 20625 kN.m2/m run
No adjustments to wall displacements


elev. = 42.00 FoS = 1.000
--------------- -------------
8 50.00 46.00 More than one strut

Analysis options


1 50.00 9.21 0.034 6.96E-03 0.0 0.0 20625
2 49.66 10.42 0.032 6.96E-03 3.3 0.6 -0.0 20625
3 49.43 11.72 0.030 6.95E-03 5.9 1.6 20625
4 49.20 13.02 0.029 6.94E-03 8.7 3.3 20625
5 48.80 15.25 0.026 6.89E-03 14.4 7.9 20625
6 48.40 17.43 0.023 6.79E-03 20.9 15.0 20625
7 48.00 19.52 0.021 6.62E-03 28.3 24.8 20625
8 47.75 20.78 0.019 6.46E-03 33.3 32.5 20625
9 47.50 21.98 0.017 6.26E-03 38.7 41.5 20625
30.58 0.017 6.26E-03 38.7 41.5
10 47.25 30.33 0.016 6.00E-03 46.3 52.1 20625
11 47.00 29.97 0.014 5.68E-03 53.8 64.7 20625
12 46.75 29.28 0.013 5.29E-03 61.2 79.1 20625
13 46.50 28.20 0.012 4.82E-03 68.4 95.3 20625
30.59 0.012 4.82E-03 68.4 95.3
14 46.15 33.43 0.010 3.99E-03 79.6 121.2 150.2 20625
33.43 0.010 3.99E-03 -70.5 121.2
15 46.00 34.65 0.010 3.61E-03 -65.4 111.0 20625
16 45.60 26.68 0.008 2.74E-03 -53.1 87.6 20625
18.15 0.008 2.74E-03 -53.1 87.6
17 45.20 9.31 0.007 2.06E-03 -47.7 69.4 20625
18 44.80 15.42 0.007 1.52E-03 -42.7 54.1 20625
19 44.40 19.18 0.006 1.12E-03 -35.8 37.3 20625
20 44.00 20.20 0.006 8.58E-04 -27.9 23.8 20625
21 43.60 19.05 0.005 6.94E-04 -20.1 13.8 20625
22 43.20 16.39 0.005 6.03E-04 -13.0 6.9 20625
23 42.80 12.84 0.005 5.61E-04 -7.1 2.7 20625
24 42.40 8.92 0.005 5.47E-04 -2.8 0.6 20625
25 42.00 4.97 0.004 5.44E-04 0.0 0.0 ---
The strut at elev. 49.66 is slack
Strut force at elev. 46.15 = 150.15 kN/m run = 150.15 kN/strut
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of results


elev. = 42.00 FoS = 1.000
--------------- -------------
1 50.00 50.00 Cant. Conditions not suitable for FoS calc.
2 50.00 45.60 Cant. 1.617 42.81 43.32 2.28
3 50.00 46.00 Cant. 1.713 42.85 43.42 2.58
4 50.00 46.00 No analysis at this stage
All remaining stages have more than one strut - FoS calculation n/a
| Sheet No. Run ID. Section A - ULS | Sheet No.
Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867 Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked :
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - ULS | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013 Summary of results (continued)
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum and minimum displacement at each stage
Units: kN,m Stage -------- Displacement --------- Stage description
Summary of results no. maximum elev. minimum elev. -----------------
m m
BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Fully Embedded Wall 1 0.000 45.60 0.000 50.00 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 50.00
Analysis options 2 0.037 50.00 0.000 50.00 Excav. to elev. 45.60 on PASSIVE side
Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00m 3 0.037 50.00 0.000 50.00 Fill to elev. 46.00 on PASSIVE side
Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients 4 No calculation at this stage Install strut no.1 at elev. 46.15
Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached 5 No calculation at this stage Install strut no.2 at elev. 49.66
Open Tension Crack analysis - No 6 0.037 50.00 0.000 50.00 Apply surcharge no.2 at elev. 50.00
7 0.034 50.00 0.000 50.00 Change soil type 13 to soil type 14
Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall 8 0.034 50.00 0.000 50.00 Change EI of wall to 20625kN.m2/m run
Strut forces at each stage (horizontal components)
Bending moment, shear force and displacement envelopes Stage --- Strut no. 1 --- --- Strut no. 2 ---
Node Y Displacement Bending moment Shear force no. at elev. 46.15 at elev. 49.66
no. coord maximum minimum maximum minimum maximum minimum kN/m run kN/strut kN/m run kN/strut
m m kN.m/m kN.m/m kN/m kN/m 6 7.36 7.36 4.72 4.72
1 50.00 0.037 0.000 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 7 150.15 150.15 slack slack
2 49.66 0.035 0.000 0.6 0.0 3.3 -3.2 8 150.15 150.15 slack slack
3 49.43 0.033 0.000 1.6 -0.3 5.9 -1.7
4 49.20 0.032 0.000 3.3 -0.5 8.7 -0.2
5 48.80 0.029 0.000 7.9 -0.2 14.4 -0.2
6 48.40 0.026 0.000 15.0 -0.3 20.9 -0.2
7 48.00 0.023 0.000 24.8 -0.3 28.3 0.0
8 47.75 0.021 0.000 32.5 -0.3 33.3 0.0
9 47.50 0.019 0.000 41.5 -0.2 38.7 0.0
10 47.25 0.017 0.000 52.1 -0.2 46.3 0.0
11 47.00 0.016 0.000 64.7 -0.2 53.8 -0.3
12 46.75 0.014 0.000 79.1 -0.3 61.2 -0.6
13 46.50 0.012 0.000 95.3 -0.5 68.4 -0.9
14 46.15 0.010 0.000 121.2 -0.8 79.6 -70.5
15 46.00 0.010 0.000 111.0 -0.8 52.2 -65.4
16 45.60 0.008 0.000 96.5 -0.9 60.9 -53.1
17 45.20 0.007 0.000 112.2 -0.9 13.2 -47.7
18 44.80 0.007 0.000 111.6 -0.8 0.3 -42.7
19 44.40 0.006 0.000 95.5 -0.7 0.4 -47.7
20 44.00 0.006 0.000 73.6 -0.5 0.4 -55.8
21 43.60 0.005 0.000 50.9 -0.4 0.4 -54.1
22 43.20 0.005 0.000 30.4 -0.2 0.3 -45.8
23 42.80 0.005 0.000 14.2 -0.1 0.3 -33.2
24 42.40 0.005 0.000 3.8 -0.0 0.1 -17.8
25 42.00 0.004 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Maximum and minimum bending moment and shear force at each stage
Stage --------- Bending moment -------- ---------- Shear force ----------
no. maximum elev. minimum elev. maximum elev. minimum elev.
kN.m/m kN.m/m kN/m kN/m
1 0.0 49.66 -0.9 45.60 0.4 44.00 -0.9 46.50
2 110.2 45.20 0.0 50.00 59.3 45.60 -54.9 44.00
3 112.0 45.20 0.0 50.00 60.9 45.60 -55.8 44.00
4 No calculation at this stage
6 112.2 45.20 -0.5 49.20 58.7 45.60 -55.7 44.00
7 121.2 46.15 0.0 50.00 79.6 46.15 -70.5 46.15
8 121.2 46.15 0.0 50.00 79.6 46.15 -70.5 46.15
| Sheet No.
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - ULS |
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - ULS| Checked :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units: kN,m
WALLAP analysis for wall section A (SLS), moments and deflection.

| Sheet No. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS
Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867 Density of water = 10.00 kN/m3
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP Active side Passive side
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - SLS | Initial water table elevation 45.60 45.60
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked : Automatic water pressure balancing at toe of wall : No
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units: kN,m
INPUT DATA WALL PROPERTIES
Type of structure = Fully Embedded Wall
SOIL PROFILE Elevation of toe of wall = 42.00
Stratum Elevation of ------------------ Soil types ------------------- Maximum finite element length = 0.40 m
no. top of stratum Active side Passive side Youngs modulus of wall E = 2.8000E+07 kN/m2
1 50.00 1 Made Ground SLS (D) 1 Made Ground SLS (D) Moment of inertia of wall I = 1.6370E-03 m4/m run
2 47.50 2 Boyn Gravel SLS (D) 2 Boyn Gravel SLS (D) E.I = 45835 kN.m2/m run
3 46.50 3 London Clay SLS (U) 3 London Clay SLS (U) Yield Moment of wall = Not defined
SOIL PROPERTIES STRUTS and ANCHORS

Bulk Young's At rest Consol Active Passive Strut/ X-section Inclin Pre-
-- Soil type -- density Modulus coeff. state. limit limit Cohesion anchor Strut area Youngs Free -ation stress Tension
No. Description kN/m3 Eh,kN/m2 Ko NC/OC Ka Kp kN/m2 no. Elev. spacing of strut modulus length (degs) /strut allowed
(Datum elev.) (dEh/dy ) (dKo/dy) ( Nu ) ( Kac ) ( Kpc ) ( dc/dy ) m sq.m kN/m2 m kN
1 Made Ground 18.00a 10000 0.500 OC 0.284 4.369 1 46.15 1.00 0.450000 1.400E+07 5.00 0.00 0 No
SLS (D) 19.00b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) 2 49.66 1.00 0.300000 1.400E+07 5.00 0.00 0 No
2 Boyn Gravel 19.00a 45000 0.470 OC 0.260 4.964
SLS (D) 19.50b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) SURCHARGE LOADS
3 London Cl.. 20.00 60000 1.300 OC 1.000 1.000 100.0u Surch Distance Length Width Surcharge Equiv. Partial
( 46.50 ) ( 6600) (0.490) (2.000) ( 2.000) ( 11.00) -arge from parallel perpend. ----- kN/m2 ----- soil factor/
4 London Cl.. 20.00 46200 1.300 OC 0.351 3.277 0.0d no. Elev. wall to wall to wall Near edge Far edge type Category
( 46.50 ) ( 5082) (0.200) (1.391) ( 4.884) 1 50.00 1.00(A) 10.00 10.00 10.00 = N/A N/A
5 Not defined 2 50.00 0.00(A) 10.00 1.00 10.00 = N/A N/A
6 Not defined
7 Not defined Note: A = Active side, P = Passive side
8 Not defined
9 Not defined CONSTRUCTION STAGES
10 Not defined Construction Stage description
11 Made Ground 18.00a 8333 0.577 OC 0.351 3.253 stage no. --------------------------------------------------------
ULS (D) 19.00b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) 1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elevation 50.00
12 Boyn Gracel 19.00a 37500 0.551 OC 0.327 3.578 2 Excavate to elevation 46.00 on PASSIVE side
ULS(D) 19.50b (0.200) (0.000) ( 0.000) 3 Install strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 46.15
13 London Cl.. 20.00 40020 1.300 OC 1.000 1.000 66.70u 4 Install strut or anchor no.2 at elevation 49.66
( 46.50 ) ( 4404) (0.490) (2.000) ( 2.000) ( 7.340) 5 Apply surcharge no.2 at elevation 50.00
14 London Cl.. 20.00 30815 1.300 OC 0.419 2.597 0.0d 6 Change properties of soil type 3 to soil type 4
( 46.50 ) ( 3391) (0.200) (1.528) ( 4.198) Ko pressures will not be reset
7 Change EI of wall to 20625 kN.m2/m run
Note: (a) and (b) are Bulk Densities above and below the water table Yield moment not defined
Additional soil parameters associated with Ka and Kp
--- parameters for Ka --- --- parameters for Kp --- FACTORS OF SAFETY and ANALYSIS OPTIONS
Soil Wall Back- Soil Wall Back-
------- Soil type ------- friction adhesion fill friction adhesion fill Stability analysis:
No. Description angle coeff. angle angle coeff. angle Method of analysis - Strength Factor method
1 Made Ground SLS (D) 30.00 0.666 0.00 30.00 0.500 0.00 Factor on soil strength for calculating wall depth = 1.00
2 Boyn Gravel SLS (D) 32.00 0.666 0.00 32.00 0.500 0.00
3 London Clay SLS (U) 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 Parameters for undrained strata:
4 London Clay SLS (D) 25.00 0.666 0.00 25.00 0.520 0.00 Minimum equivalent fluid density = 5.00 kN/m3
5 Not defined Maximum depth of water filled tension crack = 0.00 m
6 Not defined
7 Not defined Bending moment and displacement calculation:
8 Not defined Method - Subgrade reaction model using Influence Coefficients
9 Not defined Open Tension Crack analysis? - No
10 Not defined Non-linear Modulus Parameter (L) = 0 m
11 Made Ground ULS (D) 25.00 0.666 0.00 25.00 0.500 0.00
12 Boyn Gracel ULS(D) 26.67 0.666 0.00 26.67 0.500 0.00 Boundary conditions:
13 London Clay ULS (U) 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 Length of wall (normal to plane of analysis) = 1000.00 m
14 London Clay ULS (D) 20.83 0.666 0.00 20.83 0.500 0.00
Width of excavation on active side of wall = 20.00 m
Width of excavation on passive side of wall = 20.00 m
Distance to rigid boundary on active side = 20.00 m

Distance to rigid boundary on passive side = 20.00 m
OUTPUT OPTIONS | Sheet No.
Stage ------ Stage description ----------- ------- Output options ------- Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP
no. Displacement Active, Graph. Data filename/Run ID: Section A - SLS |
Bending mom. Passive output Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013
Shear force pressures Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked :
1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 50.00 No No No -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Excav. to elev. 46.00 on PASSIVE side Yes No Yes Units: kN,m
5 Apply surcharge no.2 at elev. 50.00 No No No
6 Change soil type 3 to soil type 4 No No No
7 Change EI of wall to 20625kN.m2/m run Yes No Yes
* Summary output Yes - Yes
Program WALLAP - Copyright (C) 2012 by DL Borin, distributed by GEOSOLVE

69 Rodenhurst Road, London SW4, UK. Tel: +44 20 8674 7251
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - SLS | Data filename/Run ID: Section A - SLS |
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked : Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage No. 2 Excavate to elevation 46.00 on PASSIVE side


elev. = 42.00 FoS = 1.000
--------------- -------------
2 50.00 46.00 Cant. 2.836 42.85 44.55 1.45

Analysis options


1 50.00 0.00 0.018 3.90E-03 0.0 0.0 45835
2 49.66 1.78 0.017 3.90E-03 0.3 0.0 45835
3 49.43 3.07 0.016 3.90E-03 0.9 0.2 45835
4 49.20 4.42 0.015 3.90E-03 1.7 0.5 45835
5 48.80 6.80 0.013 3.89E-03 4.0 1.6 45835
6 48.40 9.15 0.012 3.87E-03 7.2 3.8 45835
7 48.00 11.43 0.010 3.82E-03 11.3 7.4 45835
8 47.75 12.82 0.009 3.77E-03 14.3 10.6 45835
9 47.50 14.19 0.009 3.70E-03 17.7 14.6 45835
13.01 0.009 3.70E-03 17.7 14.6
10 47.25 14.31 0.008 3.61E-03 21.1 19.4 45835
11 47.00 15.60 0.007 3.48E-03 24.8 25.2 45835
12 46.75 16.87 0.006 3.33E-03 28.9 31.9 45835
13 46.50 18.14 0.005 3.13E-03 33.3 39.6 45835
17.50 0.005 3.13E-03 33.3 39.6
14 46.15 22.70 0.004 2.78E-03 40.3 54.0 45835
15 46.00 33.38 0.004 2.59E-03 44.5 60.3 45835
-127.89 0.004 2.59E-03 44.5 60.3
16 45.60 -78.78 0.003 2.03E-03 3.2 67.8 45835
17 45.20 -40.03 0.002 1.46E-03 -20.6 62.8 45835
18 44.80 -12.40 0.001 9.67E-04 -31.1 51.4 45835
19 44.40 5.10 0.001 5.77E-04 -32.5 37.9 45835
20 44.00 14.42 0.001 3.01E-04 -28.6 25.3 45835
21 43.60 17.79 0.001 1.25E-04 -22.2 15.0 45835
22 43.20 17.32 0.001 2.68E-05 -15.2 7.6 45835
23 42.80 14.68 0.001 -1.89E-05 -8.8 2.9 45835
24 42.40 11.04 0.001 -3.40E-05 -3.6 0.6 45835
25 42.00 7.03 0.001 -3.65E-05 0.0 0.0 ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage No. 7 Change EI of wall to 20625 kN.m2/m run


elev. = 42.00 FoS = 1.000
--------------- -------------
7 50.00 46.00 More than one strut

Analysis options


1 50.00 4.98 0.017 3.84E-03 0.0 0.0 20625
2 49.66 6.30 0.016 3.84E-03 1.9 0.3 -0.0 20625
3 49.43 7.46 0.015 3.84E-03 3.5 0.9 20625
4 49.20 8.62 0.014 3.83E-03 5.4 2.0 20625
5 48.80 10.61 0.013 3.80E-03 9.2 4.8 20625
6 48.40 12.57 0.011 3.74E-03 13.8 9.4 20625
7 48.00 14.47 0.010 3.63E-03 19.2 16.0 20625
8 47.75 15.62 0.009 3.53E-03 23.0 21.3 20625
9 47.50 16.74 0.008 3.39E-03 27.0 27.5 20625
19.87 0.008 3.39E-03 27.0 27.5
10 47.25 20.34 0.007 3.22E-03 32.1 34.9 20625
11 47.00 20.63 0.006 3.01E-03 37.2 43.6 20625
12 46.75 20.71 0.006 2.74E-03 42.4 53.6 20625
13 46.50 20.56 0.005 2.42E-03 47.5 64.8 20625
25.68 0.005 2.42E-03 47.5 64.8
14 46.15 28.06 0.004 1.85E-03 56.9 84.6 128.0 20625
28.06 0.004 1.85E-03 -71.1 84.6
15 46.00 33.99 0.004 1.59E-03 -66.5 74.2 20625
16 45.60 30.38 0.003 1.05E-03 -53.6 49.0 20625
17 45.20 31.48 0.003 7.17E-04 -41.2 29.1 20625
18 44.80 29.74 0.003 5.27E-04 -29.0 14.5 20625
19 44.40 25.74 0.003 4.43E-04 -17.9 4.7 20625
20 44.00 20.13 0.002 4.26E-04 -8.7 -0.8 20625
21 43.60 13.54 0.002 4.42E-04 -2.0 -2.9 20625
22 43.20 6.43 0.002 4.67E-04 2.0 -2.8 20625
23 42.80 -0.87 0.002 4.87E-04 3.1 -1.7 20625
24 42.40 -5.13 0.002 4.96E-04 1.9 -0.4 20625
25 42.00 -4.56 0.001 4.97E-04 0.0 0.0 ---
The strut at elev. 49.66 is slack
Strut force at elev. 46.15 = 128.03 kN/m run = 128.03 kN/strut
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of results


elev. = 42.00 FoS = 1.000
--------------- -------------
1 50.00 50.00 Cant. Conditions not suitable for FoS calc.
2 50.00 46.00 Cant. 2.836 42.85 44.55 1.45
3 50.00 46.00 No analysis at this stage
All remaining stages have more than one strut - FoS calculation n/a
| Sheet No. Run ID. Section A - SLS | Sheet No.
Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A38.B55.R43 | Job No. 14867 Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked :
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - SLS | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newbury Park Mosquen Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL | Date:26-11-2013 Summary of results (continued)
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum and minimum displacement at each stage
Units: kN,m Stage -------- Displacement --------- Stage description
Summary of results no. maximum elev. minimum elev. -----------------
m m
BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Fully Embedded Wall 1 0.000 46.15 0.000 50.00 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 50.00
Analysis options 2 0.018 50.00 0.000 50.00 Excav. to elev. 46.00 on PASSIVE side
Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00m 3 No calculation at this stage Install strut no.1 at elev. 46.15
Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients 4 No calculation at this stage Install strut no.2 at elev. 49.66
Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached 5 0.018 50.00 0.000 50.00 Apply surcharge no.2 at elev. 50.00
Open Tension Crack analysis - No 6 0.017 50.00 0.000 50.00 Change soil type 3 to soil type 4
7 0.017 50.00 0.000 50.00 Change EI of wall to 20625kN.m2/m run
Passive side 20.00 from wall Strut forces at each stage (horizontal components)
Stage --- Strut no. 1 --- --- Strut no. 2 ---
Bending moment, shear force and displacement envelopes no. at elev. 46.15 at elev. 49.66
Node Y Displacement Bending moment Shear force kN/m run kN/strut kN/m run kN/strut
no. coord maximum minimum maximum minimum maximum minimum 5 6.84 6.84 3.85 3.85
m m kN.m/m kN.m/m kN/m kN/m 6 128.03 128.03 slack slack
1 50.00 0.018 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 128.03 128.03 slack slack
2 49.66 0.017 0.000 0.3 0.0 1.9 -2.6
3 49.43 0.016 0.000 0.9 -0.3 3.5 -1.4
4 49.20 0.015 0.000 2.0 -0.4 5.4 -0.2
5 48.80 0.014 0.000 4.8 -0.2 9.2 -0.2
6 48.40 0.012 0.000 9.4 -0.2 13.8 -0.1
7 48.00 0.010 0.000 16.0 -0.3 19.2 0.0
8 47.75 0.009 0.000 21.3 -0.2 23.0 0.0
9 47.50 0.009 0.000 27.5 -0.2 27.0 0.0
10 47.25 0.008 0.000 34.9 -0.1 32.1 0.0
11 47.00 0.007 0.000 43.6 -0.1 37.2 -0.1
12 46.75 0.006 0.000 53.6 -0.2 42.4 -0.4
13 46.50 0.005 0.000 64.8 -0.3 47.5 -0.6
14 46.15 0.004 0.000 84.6 -0.5 56.9 -71.1
15 46.00 0.004 0.000 74.2 -0.5 44.5 -66.5
16 45.60 0.003 0.000 68.6 -0.6 3.2 -53.6
17 45.20 0.003 0.000 62.9 -0.5 0.1 -41.2
18 44.80 0.003 0.000 51.4 -0.5 0.2 -31.7
19 44.40 0.003 0.000 37.9 -0.4 0.2 -32.7
20 44.00 0.002 0.000 25.3 -0.8 0.3 -28.6
21 43.60 0.002 0.000 15.0 -2.9 0.2 -22.2
22 43.20 0.002 0.000 7.6 -2.8 2.0 -15.2
23 42.80 0.002 0.000 2.9 -1.7 3.1 -8.8
24 42.40 0.002 0.000 0.6 -0.4 1.9 -3.6
25 42.00 0.001 0.000 0.0 -0.0 0.0 -0.0
Maximum and minimum bending moment and shear force at each stage
Stage --------- Bending moment -------- ---------- Shear force ----------
no. maximum elev. minimum elev. maximum elev. minimum elev.
kN.m/m kN.m/m kN/m kN/m
1 0.0 49.66 -0.6 45.60 0.4 47.50 -0.6 46.50
2 67.8 45.60 0.0 50.00 44.5 46.00 -32.5 44.40
5 68.6 45.60 -0.4 49.20 43.8 46.15 -32.7 44.40
6 84.6 46.15 -2.9 43.60 56.9 46.15 -71.1 46.15
7 84.6 46.15 -2.9 43.60 56.9 46.15 -71.1 46.15
| Sheet No.
Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by : JBP
Data filename/Run ID: Section A - SLS |
Contiguous Pile Retaining Wall - 350mm dia @ 500mm c/c - SLS| Checked :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units: kN,m
GEOBOND Ltd. APPENDIX B
APPENDIX B
Ref No Description
B1 Results of “ADCOL” analysis for 350mm diameter pile with 4 x B20mm bars, 0kN
compression load. 50mm cover to reinforcement. Section A.
B2 Helical check for 350mm diameter pile with cage of 4 x B20mm bars comprising
B8mm helical at 175mm centres. Section A.
Job No. Sheet No. Rev.
14867
Newbury Park Mosque, Oaks Lane, Ilford. IG2 7PL Drg. Ref.
Contiguous Bored Pile Retaining Wall
Made by Date Checked
350mm dia @ 450mm c/c JBP 06-Nov-2013
Reinforcement Details
Bar Arrangement 1 ring(s)/4 bars per ring
Diameter of main bars 20mm
Area of reinforcement 1256.64mm²
Nominal Cover (outer) 50mm
Design Results
Analysis Case Name Analysis Case 1
Axial Design Force 0kN
Axial Capacity 2030.82kN
Design Moment 'M' 54.5kNm
Ultimate Moment 'Mu' 62.2381kNm
Neutral Axis
Comp./Tens. Side +/-
Governing Node/Bar
M/Mu = 0.876
-
+
350mm
Section 1
Analysis Case 1
Program ADC Version 8.3.1.10 Copyright © Oasys 1990–2010 Page 1

Printed 26-Nov-2013 Time 15:04
JOB NAME: Newbury Park Mosque, Oaks Lane, ILFORD. IG2 7PL Sheet
Calc. Title : 350mm dia with 4 No B20mm bars. Date : 26-Nov-13
Ref. No. : 14867
Prep. By : JBP Check :
Parameters
Design Loads Reinforcement

Main Secondary
Vertical (max.) 0 kN Bar Dia. 20 mm 8 mm
Vertical (min.) 0 kN fy 500 N/mm² 500 N/mm²
Moment 55 kN Int Dia. n/a 234 mm
Shear 44 kN 0
Load Factor 1.05 Pile dia.(h) 350 mm
fcu 35 N/mm² Cover 50 mm
Main Steel
hs = 214 mm thus hs/h = 0.61
M/h3 = 1.35 N/mm² and max.N/h² = 0.00 N/mm²

min.N/h² = 0.00 N/mm³
Reference to BCA Design Charts for circular columns to BS8110
Req'd bending steel = 1.31 % thus Bending steel = 1257 mm²

Required tensile steel = 0 mm²
Total As = 1257 mm²
No. of Bars = 4.0
Secondary Steel
Equating the pile section to an equivalent rectangle
b= 310 mm and d= 250 mm
Then V= 0.60 N/mm2(ULS) and V= 0.57 N/mm²(SLS)

OK (cl. 3.4.5.2)
Taking 2 bars as effective in tension gives 100As/bd = 0.81 %
Reference to BS8110 (1997) : Part 1: clause 3.4.5 1/3
All. (fcu/25) = 1.12
Thus Vc'(eq.6a) = 0.74 N/mm² and Vc' (eq.6b) = 0.74 N/mm²
No axial load, thus Design Vc = 0.74 N/mm²
Taking Sv = 175 mm then Asv = 46 mm²
Minimum required dia. = 5.4 mm

OK
Adopt 4B20 (main) and B8@175 (Links)
GEOBOND Ltd. APPENDIX C
APPENDIX C
Ref No Description
C1 Results of “PILE” analysis for 350mm diameter pile based on an underside of pile
cap level of 45.40m AOD.
Geobond Limited Page No 1
Analysis 01
CADS Bearing Pile Designer Version 1.09 Project 14867

Geotechnical analysis and design of bearing piles File Name 350mm.bpd
Newbury Park Mosque, Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL Engineer JBP
Axial Loads Capacity Calculations - 350mm dia CFA Date 26/11/2013
Pile type and size

Pile length 10.00
Pile type CFA
Pile diameter 350
Soils and ground water data

Ground Water level 0.00
Top Soil C C SPT SPT Auto

Level Description Type Density Phi Base Inc Base Inc. Value
m kN/m3 Deg kN/m2 kN/m3 (/m)
45.40 London Clay Undrained 20.00 112 11.0 Auto
Calculation options
Factors of safety
Compression check 1 Overall FOS 3.00
Compression check 2 Shaft resist. FOS 3.00
End resistance FOS 3.00
Tension check Overall FOS 3.00
Soil strength partial factors
Factor on strength of granular soils 1.00
Factor on strength of other soil types 1.00
Unit strength capacity limits
Max. unit shaft resist. Granular soils 100 kN/m2
Cohesive soils 110 kN/m2
Chalk soils 150 kN/m2
Max. unit end bearing Granular - Augered 5000 kN/m2
Granular - Driven 10000 kN/m2
Cohesive soils 10000 kN/m2
Chalk soils 10000 kN/m2
Negative and zero skin friction zones
Depth of soils over which NSF is applied 0 m
Additional depth for zero shaft resistance 0 m
Percentage of skin friction in NSF calc. 100 %
Results summary
Ultimate end bearing resistance 192 kN
Ultimate shaft resistance 918 kN
Design compression 370 kN
Design tension 314 kN
Geobond Limited Page No 2
Analysis 01
CADS Bearing Pile Designer Version 1.09 Project 14867

Geotechnical analysis and design of bearing piles File Name 350mm.bpd
Newbury Park Mosque, Oaks Lane, ILFORD IG2 7PL Engineer JBP
Axial Loads Capacity Calculations - 350mm dia CFA Date 26/11/2013
Tabular presentation of calculation output
Calc Vert Vert Unit Ult. Unit Ult. Design Design

Level Total Water Stress Phi C'/Cu SPT Shaft Shaft End End Comp. Tension
m kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 deg kN/m2 kN/m2 kN kN/m2 kN kN kN
45.40 0 0 0 0 112 0 56 0 1008 97 32 0

45.00 8 0 8 0 116 0 58 25 1048 101 42 9
44.50 18 0 18 0 122 0 61 58 1097 106 54 20
44.00 28 0 28 0 127 0 64 92 1147 110 67 32
43.50 38 0 38 0 133 0 66 128 1196 115 81 44
43.00 48 0 48 0 138 0 69 165 1246 120 95 57
42.50 58 0 58 0 144 0 72 204 1295 125 110 70
42.00 68 0 68 0 149 0 75 244 1345 129 125 84
41.50 78 0 78 0 155 0 77 286 1394 134 140 99
41.00 88 0 88 0 160 0 80 329 1444 139 156 113
40.50 98 0 98 0 166 0 83 374 1493 144 173 129
40.00 108 0 108 0 171 0 86 421 1543 148 190 145
39.50 118 0 118 0 177 0 88 469 1592 153 207 161
39.00 128 0 128 0 182 0 91 518 1642 158 225 178
38.50 138 0 138 0 188 0 94 569 1691 163 244 195
38.00 148 0 148 0 193 0 97 621 1741 167 263 213
37.50 158 0 158 0 199 0 99 675 1790 172 282 231
37.00 168 0 168 0 204 0 102 731 1840 177 303 250
36.50 178 0 178 0 210 0 105 788 1889 182 323 270
36.00 188 0 188 0 215 0 108 846 1939 187 344 290
35.50 198 0 198 0 221 0 110 906 1988 191 366 310
35.40 200 0 200 0 222 0 110 918 1998 192 370 314

Geobond LTD.: Contiguous Bored Piled Retaining Wall Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geobond LTD.: Contiguous Bored Piled Retaining Wall Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GEOBOND Ltd.

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

CONTIGUOUS BORED PILED RETAINING WALL DESIGN

FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SUPPORT CONDITIONS

Plus FOUNDATION SUPPORT PILE DESIGNS

PROPOSED NEWBURY PARK MOSQUE, OAKS LANE

ILFORD IG2 7PL

Initial Issue 0 Preliminary Design Calculations for Approval 27/11/2013

Stage Revision Comments Date

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

2.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED

3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS

4.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY

5.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND GENERAL COMMENTS

5.1 Internal bearing piles

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

2.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED

2.1 General and Structural Arrangements for the Proposed Development

• Contiguous Bored Pile Retaining Wall

Along the line of the required wall PPL = 50.00m AOD

• Foundation Bearing Piles

Within the plan area of the building PPL = 50.00m AOD.

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

2.2 Ground Conditions

A summary of the borehole result is presented in Table 1

Table 1: Borehole Results

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS

3.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Table 2 Geotechnical Design Parameters

Soil Type SLS Parameters ULS Parameters

Bulk Density (γ) = 18kN/m Bulk Density (γ) = 18kN/m

Bulk Density (γ) = 19kN/m Bulk Density (γ) = 19kN/m

Bulk Density (γ) = 20kN/m Bulk Density (γ) = 20kN/m

Bulk Density (γ) = 20kN/m Bulk Density (γ) = 20kN/m

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

Weathered London Clay C’ = 0.0 kN/m² C’ = 0.0 kN/m²

Piling Platform Level = EGL (50.00m AOD)

Boyn Hill GRAVEL

Underside of Basement Slab = 46.0m AOD London CLAY

London CLAY Undrained Parameters

Piling Platform Level = EGL (50.00m AOD)

Boyn Hill GRAVEL

Underside of Basement Slab = 46.0m AOD London CLAY

London CLAY Undrained Parameters

Design By: JBP Job No: Design Ref: 14867 Rev: 0

3.2 Construction Sequence Adopted Within the Design Calculations.

Contiguous Bored Piles (PPL = 50.00m AOD)

• Apply external surcharges.

3.3 Structural Design Parameters

Table 3 – Structural Retaining Wall Design Parameters

MATERIAL SHORT TERM PARAMETERS LONG TERM PARAMETERS

Concrete E= 2.8 x 10+7 kN/m² E= 1.40 x 10+7 kN/m²

350mm Ø I = 0.00163696 m4/m run I = 0.00163693 m4/m run

450mm centres EI = 45 835 kN/m²/m EI = 22 917 kN/m²/m

Steel E= 2.05 x 10+8 kN/m² E= 2.05 x 10+8 kN/m²