Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING MODULE
Assessment of Human Learning
Name: __________________________________________________________________
Degree/Program: ________________________________________________________
Year Level: ______________________________________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
TITLE PAGE NO.
Introduction 4
Overview 5
Orientation 5
Grading System 5
Module Map 6
Syllabus 7
INTRODUCTION:
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
This is a Learning Module (LM) of the course Assessment of Human
Learning (Educ.326) This is prepared for blended learning and remote learning
modalities. This is also designed to help independent learning and self-
regulated learning among the students and emphasized the development of the
21st century skills.
OVERVIEW
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
One of the main task of a teacher is to assess the students’ performance
and to evaluate classroom instruction. The effectiveness of assessment and
evaluation is good evidence which, in the classroom setting comes in the form
of tests. Constructing tests require specific skills and experience hence, this
Module attempts to address the need of student-teachers to gain necessary
skills and competence in assessment of student learning.
MODULE MAP
ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN
LEARNING ( Educ. 313)
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
OUTCOMES (SLO) CONTENT/SUBJECT (ATs)
MATTER
Unit 1: At the end of Unit 1: Nature and Review Exercises
unit, the students Purposes of Assessment
should be able to:
Classroom
discuss the Assessment Illustrate clearly
importance of defined the interdepen-
assessment in Purposes and dence and
classroom Functions of interrelation-ship
instruction; Assessment among
differentiate test, Importance of instructional
measurement Assessment objectives,
and assessment Scope of educational
from evaluation; Assessment experiences and
enumerate the Principles of assessments.
sound principles Assessment Discuss the
of assessment in Trends of implications of
education; Classroom having a teacher
cite examples of Assessment who has a poor
norm and Portfolio grasp of the
criterion- Commonly Used assessment
referenced Assessment in the process and its
evaluation Classroom principles.
Performance Task Summative quizzes
Rubrics and a unit test may
be done to ensure
Norm-and
that students are
Criterion-
familiar of the
Reference
lessons.
Interpretation
Unit 2: At the end of Unit 2: Establishing Review Exercise
the unit, the students Learning Targets
should be able to:
Differentiate the Purpose of Think of one
types of learning Instructional specific lesson in
targets Goals and your field of
Give concrete Objectives specialization.
examples of the Learning Targets Prepare a series of
different learning Bloom’s objectives
targets Taxonomy of progressing from
Discuss the Learning Domains the low-level
taxonomies of cognitive domain
learning up to the
appropriate
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
affective domain
Answer summative
assessment
Unit 3: At the end of Unit 3: Preparation of Review Exercises
the unit, the students Classroom Assessment
should be able to:
List down the Planning the Interview teachers
planning stages Teacher-Made on how they
in preparing a Test prepare a test for
classroom test Writing the their students.
Establish Objective Short- Have a sample of
relationships Response Test their TOS
among learning Table of
objectives, Specifications
teaching and
testing
Cite the
importance of
the table of
specifications in
making the test
more valid and
reliable
Construct a
sample table of
specifications
Unit 4: At the end of Unit 4: Development of Review Exercises
the unit, the students Classroom Assessment
should be able to:
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
how the questions
were formulated
Answer summative
assessment
Unit 5: At the end of Unit 5: Item Analysis Review Exercise
the unit, the students
should be able to:
Point out the Procedure in Item Communicate with
importance of Analysis a teacher whom
item analysis in Sample of An Item you know. With a
the improvement Analysis complete set of test
of constructed Computation of D papers with
test items value multiple choice
Analyze test Computation of P items that has
items of value been administered
discrimination to the students,
index and find the index of
difficulty index difficulty and index
Identify the of discrimination of
various ways of each item. A
interpreting test minimum of 5 test
scores items.
Answer summative
assessment
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
should be able to:
find and Arithmetic Mean Compute for the
interpret the Median mean, median,
measures of Mode mode and standard
central location Standard deviation
and other point Deviation Answer summative
measures of a Comparison of the test
set of values or three Indices of
scores Central Location
determine the
measures of
central location
and other point
measures in
interpreting test
scores.
use measure of
central location
and other point
measures in
interpreting test
scores.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Objectives:
At the end of this unit, the students are expected to:
EXPLORE
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
EXPLAIN
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
There are four purposes of assessment according to Wyatt(1988) These are:
to inform the teacher about a student’s progress
to inform the students about their progress
to inform others about the students’ progress (parents and teachers)
to provide information for the public.
Importance of Assessment
Scope of Assessment
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
The chief purpose of assessment is the improvement of the student.
Specifically, it assesses the learning outcomes of instruction which are:
Principles of Assessment
From To
Sole emphasis on outcomes Assessment of processes
Isolated skills Integrated skills
Isolated facts Application of knowledge
Paper-and-pen tasks Authentic assessment
Decontextualized tasks Contextualized tasks
A single correct answer Several correct answers
Secret standards Public standards
Secret criteria Public criteria
Individuals Groups
After instructions During instruction
Little feedback Considerable feedback
Objective tests Performance-based tests
Standardized tests Informal tests
External Evaluation Students’ self-evaluation
Single assessment Multiple assessments
Sporadic Continual
Conclusive Recursive
Non-Testing
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Non-testing is an alternative assessment in the sense that it diverts from
the paper-and -pen test. There are two non-testing techniques; performance-
based assessment and portfolio assessment.
Portfolio
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
4. They contain works that represents a variety of different assessment
tools.
5. They contain a variety of work samples and its evaluation by the student,
peers and teachers, even reaction from parents.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Should be specific, frequent, repetitive, and free from the restrictions
from grading (Christodoulou, 2016)
Should target skills that are necessary to the attainment of learning
competencies as measured in summative assessments
Performance Task:
Allow learners to show what they know and are able to do in diverse
ways
May include products or performances (e.g. skills demonstrations, group
presentations, oral work, multimedia presentations, research projects)
May include written outputs
Must be designed to provide opportunities for learners to apply what they
are learning to real-life situations
Must be accompanied with clear directions and appropriate scoring tools
to help learners demonstrate their learning
Preferred to be collaboratively designed and implemented, integrating two
or more competencies within or across subject areas
To be accomplished flexibly to consider time and available resources
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Comparison of Norm-and Criterion-Referenced Assessments
ELABORATE
2. Discuss the implication of having a teacher who has a poor grasp of the
assessment process and its principles.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
EVALUATE
2. The term used to refer to the full range of information gathered and
synthesized by teachers about their students and classrooms is called
______________.
a. assessment c. evaluation
b. formative evaluation d. summative evaluation
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 2: ESTABLISHING LEARNING TARGETS
Objectives:
EXPLORE
EXPLAIN
Educational goals are general statements of what students will know and
be able to do. Goals are written to cover most of the instructional time such as
unit, semester etc. They also provided a starting point for more specific
learning objectives.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Learning Targets
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
The learning standards in the curriculum reflect progressions of concept
development. The Cognitive Process Dimensions adapted from Anderson &
Krathwohl (2001) may be a good way to operationalize these progressions. It
provides a scheme for classifying educational goals, objectives, and standards.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
1. First Dimension: Knowledge or Remembering
Sample Questions:
What is the title of the story?
Who are the characters?
Where does the grasshopper stay?
Why does the ant save food?
Sample Questions:
1. Compare the grasshopper and the ant.
2. What words describe the ant? the
grasshopper?
3. What does the saying “Save for a rainy day” mean?
Sample Question:
1. If you were the grasshopper, what would have you done?
2. Why is it important to practice thrift and economy?
The reader breaks down the material into component facts so that its
organizational structure can be understood such as elements, hypothesis,
statement of facts, others.
Sample Questions:
1. What is the writer’s purpose for writing the story?
2. What literary device did the writer use to make the selection
interesting to the readers?
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
5.Fifth Dimension: Evaluation
Sample Questions:
1. Prove that the ant did right in storing good for the rainy day.
2. Did the grasshopper deserve to go hungry? Cite reasons for your
answer.
Sample Questions:
1. What other things can you save in order to economize?
2. What ways can you suggest to save on the
following:
Food? Electricity? 4 Water? Clothing? Other resources?
ELABORATE
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
EVALUATE
_____1. Students will know the dates and countries of origin of the major
immigrant groups to the US
_____2. Students will explain the motives of Filipino migrants in going to the
U.S.
_____3. Students will design an immigration policy that is fair to future
immigrant groups.
_____4. Students will decide whether the current U.S. immigration policy is fair
to various immigrant groups, tell why?
_____5. Which of several suggested procedures is not acceptable for achieving a
stated goal but also meets and added criterion such as faster,
cheapest,
most accurate.
_____6. Nakikilala ang mga matatalinghagang salita at idyoma.
_____7. Nakasusulat ng liham paanyaya o pagtanggap ng paanyaya.
_____8. If gasoline consumption needs to be curtailed, do you favor direct or
indirect means of doing so? In your answer, include at least three
historical precedents.
_____9. Design a survey form to measure student’s attitude toward the English
rule.
_____10. From the lessons learned volcanoes, design a volcano model.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 3: PREPARATION OF CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT
Objectives:
EXPLORE
EXPLAIN
Good tests do not just happen. They require adequate and extensive
planning so that the goals of instruction (objectives), the teaching strategy to be
employed, the textual material and the evaluative procedures are all related in
some meaningful fashion.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Below is the Systematic Planning Process
Id e ntify
Instruc tio na
l G o a ls
Id e ntify Pla n C ho o se De sig n Im p le m e nt
O b je c tive s instruc tio na l Instruc tio na l Asse ssm e nt Instruc tio n
a c tivitie s Me d ia To o ls
Ana lyze
Le a rne rs
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Writing the Objective Short-Response Test
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Table of Specifications (TOS)
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION
COMPETENCIES SKILLS TOTAL %
NUMBER
OF
ITEMS
R U A AN EV C
Subject-verb 2 1 1 4 20%
Agreement
Gerund Phrase 4 2 6 30%
Prepositional 2 1 3 15%
Phrase
Participial Phrase 3 2 5 25%
Infinitive Phrase 2 2 10%
TOTAL 10 7 3 20 100%
Legend:
R- Remembering AN- Analyzing
U- Understanding EV- Evaluation
A- Applying C- Creating
% - percentage = total number of items for each competency over the
total number of items
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
on the part of the teachers. It serves as a monitoring agent and can help keep
the teacher from straying off the instructional track.
ELABORATE
Interview teachers on how they prepare a test for their students. Have a
sample of their TOS. Post your TOS on the box provided below.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
EVALUATE
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 4: DEVELOPMENT OF CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT
Objectives:
At the end of the unit, the students are expected to:
EXPLORE
EXPLAIN
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
7. Avoid copying text directly from reference materials
8. Place the easier test items at the beginning of each section
9. The test item should discriminate between those who have mastered the
objective and those who have not
Basic Parts
Stem – problem
Either in a form of question or an incomplete statement
Alternatives – list of suggested solutions
Contains:
Best alternative (answer)
Distractors (Inferior alternatives)
- Purpose of distracters is to appear as plausible to the problem for
those students who have not achieved the objective being
measured by the test item.
- The distracters must appear as implausible solutions for those
students who have achieved the objective.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
6. Avoid the use of All of the above
Poor: Which of the following factors must be considered in computing
basal energy requirements?
A. Age
B. Height
C. Weight
D. All of the above
Better: Which of the following factors must be considered in computing
basal energy requirements?
A. Weight only
B. Age only
C. Height and Weight only
D. Age, height and weight
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
C. holding the wheel firmly
D. slowing down gradually
Better: All of the following are safe driving practices on icy roads EXCEPT
A. accelerating slowly
B. jamming on the brakes
C. holding the wheel firmly
D. slowing down gradually
D. slowing down gradually
Better: What is the most general cause of low individual incomes in the
United States?
A. lack of valuable productive services to sell.
B. the population's overall unwillingness to work.
C. the nation's increased reliance on automation.
D. an increasing national level of inflation
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
6. a reduced guessing factor when compared to true-false items.
Disadvantages
Multiple-choice items ...
1. are difficult and time consuming to construct.
2. lead an instructor to favor simple recall of facts.
3. Encourage guessing.
Matching Items
Matching item consists of two columns: one column of stems or problems to
be answered, and another column of responses from which the answers are to
be chosen. Traditionally, the column of stems is placed on the left and the
column of responses is placed on the right.
True or False
Suggestions for Writing True-False Test Items
1. Base true-false items upon statements that are absolutely true or false,
without qualifications or exceptions.
2. Express the item statement as simply and as clearly as possible.
3. Express a single idea in each test item.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
4. Include enough background information and qualifications so that the
ability to respond correctly to the item does not depend on some
special, uncommon knowledge.
5. Avoid lifting statements from the text, lecture or other materials so that
memory alone will not permit a correct answer.
6. Avoid using negatively stated item statements.
7. Avoid the use of unfamiliar vocabulary.
8. . Avoid the use of specific determiners which would permit a test-wise
but unprepared examinee to respond correctly. Specific determiners
refer to sweeping terms like "all," "always," "none," "never,"
"impossible," "inevitable," etc. Statements including such terms are
likely to be false. On the other hand, statements using qualifying
determiners such as "usually," "sometimes," "often," etc., are likely to
be true. When statements do require the use of specific determiners,
make sure they appear in both true and false items.
9. False items tend to discriminate more highly than true items.
Therefore, use more false items than true items (but no more than 15%
additional false items).
1. Prepare essay items that elicit the type of behavior you want to measure.
2. Phrase each item so that the student's task is clearly indicated.
3. Indicate for each item a point value or weight and an estimated time limit
for answering.
4. Ask questions that will elicit responses on which experts could agree that
one answer is better than another.
5. Avoid giving the student a choice among optional items as this greatly
reduces the reliability of the test.
6. It is generally recommended for classroom examinations to administer
several short-answer items rather than only one or two extended-
response items.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
1. are easier and less time consuming to construct than are most other
item types.
2. provide a means for testing student's ability to compose an answer and
present it in a logical manner.
3. can efficiently measure higher order cognitive objectives (e.g., analysis,
synthesis, evaluation).
Limitations in Using Essay Items
Essay items
1. cannot measure a large amount of content or objectives.
2. generally, provide low test and test scorer reliability.
3. require an extensive amount of instructor's time to read and grade.
4. generally, do not provide an objective measure of student achievement or
ability (subject to bias on the part of the grader).
Essay Test and other performance-based tasks are rated using the Rubric.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
ELABORATE
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
EVALUATE
1. Formulate two (2) sample items for the following types of tests.
a. Multiple Choice
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
b. True or False
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
c. Matching Type
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
d. Filling the Blanks or Completion
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
e. Essay
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 5: ITEM ANALYSIS
Objectives:
At the of the unit, the students are expected to:
EXPLORE
EXPLAIN
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
1. Check and score the answer sheets.
2. Arrange the papers from highest to lowest.
3. Remove the 27% highest and 27% lowest of the papers, leaving the
remaining 46% intact ( Sax, 1989) Select the top third and bottom third
for comparison ( Bergman, n.d.) Divide the papers into two groups using
the median as reference. In case of a tie between the papers in the
median, assign each paper into lower and higher groups by chance.
(Downie, 1984)
4. Count the number of students in the upper 27% who responded to each
option. Enter the data in the third column. Do the same for the lower
27% (see. Table below)
5. Subtract the number of students in the lower group who selected the
correct alternatives (marked with asterisks) from the number of students
who responded correctly in the upper 27%. Place the value in the fifth
column.
6. Divide the difference found in the fifth column by the number of students
in the upper 27% or lower 27%. The value obtained is the index of
discrimination and is entered in the sixth column.
7. Count
8. the number of students in the middle 46% who made the correct
response and place the value in the seventh column.
9. Add the number of individuals who responded correctly to the item
(upper 27%, lower 27% and middle 46%) and enter the data in the eight
column.
10. Divide the value in column 8 by N, the total number of examinees,
and enter the value, and enter the value in the last column. This is the
proportion of students who responded correctly. The quotient is the
index of discrimination.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
TABLE FOR INTERPRETING INDEX OF DSCRIMINATION
(D TABULAR VALUES)
1. Determine the difference between the number of students who got the
correct answer from the upper 27% and the number of the students who
got the correct answer from the lower 27%.
2. Divide the difference from the 27% of the total number of examinees,
Difference
D value = 27% of N where N is the total number of examinees
= 13-7
20
= 6
20
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Computation of the P Value (Index of Difficulty)
1. Determine the total number of students who got the correct answer on
the item from the UPPER and LOWER 27% and from the MIDDLE 46%.
2. Divide the sum of the total number of students who got the correct
answer from the total number of students who took the examination.
R
P value = N where R is the total number of students who got
the right answer
and N is the total number of students who took
the examination
= 45
75
= 0.6
The computed P value is 0.6 which is interpreted as an average item
DECISION TABLE
ELABORATE
Communicate with a teacher whom you know. With a complete set of test
papers with multiple choice items that has been administered to the students,
find the index of difficulty and index of discrimination of each item. A minimum
of 5 test items.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
EVALUATE
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 6: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
Objectives:
At the end of the unit, the students are expected to:
present the frequency distribution;
solve for cumulative frequency “less than” and “greater than
find and interpret cumulative percentage frequency “lesser than” and
“greater than”.
EXPLORE
EXPLAIN
Frequency Distribution
50 97 96 48 55 58 59 51 53 95
85 80 83 77 70 60 62 63 64 65
90 91 92 93 90 83 82 66 67 68
98 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 69
93 71 72 73 75 78 79 84 86 87
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
frequency of occurrence of values falling within arbitrary defined ranges of the
variable known as class interval (Freguson and Takane, 1989)
In arranging the scores in a form of frequency distribution, the steps are
as follows:
Step 1: Find the absolute range. The range is obtained by subtracting the
highest score (HS) and the lowest score (LS). In the table, the highest score is
98 and the lowest score, 48. Hence, the range is 98 -48 = 50.
Step 2: Find the class interval. In finding the class interval, we simply divide
the range by 10 and by 20 such that the class limits are not less than 10 and
not more than 20, provided that the class covers the total number of scores.
Illustration: 50 =5 50 = 2.5
10 20
In choosing class interval, odd number is preferred. There are two odd
numbers 5 and 3 obtained from the range of 50 and quotients 2.5 and 5. For
instance, 5 is chosen as the class interval, provided however, that the class
limits will be more than 20 and not less than 10. The ideal class limit is 12 to
15. There are 11 class limits obtained from the 50 scores.
Step 3: Set up the class. In setting classes, simply add C/2 or one-half of the
class interval (C) to the highest score, 98 and subtract C/2 to the highest
score as the highest class limit 95.5 – 100.5
The highest class limit is 100.5 – 95.5. Subtract 5 as class interval from
the lower class limit of the highest class, 95.5, e.g 95. 5 – 5 = 90.5 – 5 = 85.5,
up to the lowest score. This is real limit. To convert real limit to integral limit,
subtract 0.5 from the upper class limit and add 0.5 to the lower class limit. See
the illustration below:
CLASS LIMIT
Real Limits Integral Limits
95.5 – 100.5 96 – 100
90.5 – 95.5 91 - 95
85.5 – 90.5 86 – 90
80.5 – 85.5 81 – 85
75.5 – 80.5 76 – 80
70.5 - 75.5 71 – 75
65.5 – 70.5 66 – 70
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
60.5 – 65.5 61 – 65
55.5 – 60.5 56 – 60
50.5 - 55.5 51 – 55
45.5 - 50.5 46 - 50
Step 4: Tally the scores. Having adopted the set of classes, we are now ready
to tally the scores. The tally must be carefully checked if the sum of each class
is equal and also to the number of cases. If unequally tally occurs, tallying
must be repeated and symbol N or ∑f is written which means number of cases
(N) or “sum of” frequency (∑f) equals to 50.
Classes
Real Limit Integral Limit Tally Frequency
95.5 – 100.5 96 – 100 111 3
90.5 – 95.5 91 - 95 1111 5
85.5 – 90.5 86 – 90 1111 4
80.5 – 85.5 81 – 85 1111 5
75.5 – 80.5 76 – 80 1111-1 6
70.5 - 75.5 71 – 75 1111-1111 9
65.5 – 70.5 66 – 70 1111-1 6
60.5 – 65.5 61 – 65 1111 4
55.5 – 60.5 56 – 60 111 3
50.5 - 55.5 51 – 55 111 3
45.5 - 50.5 46 - 50 11 2
TOTAL 50 ( N or ∑f)
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
CPF = CF x 100
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
N
Where:
CPF = Cumulative percentage frequency
CF = Cumulative frequency
N = Number of cases
= 27 x 100
50
= 0.54 x 100
CPF = 54%
For cumulative frequency “greater than” (CPF>) has the same process
with cumulative percentage frequency “ lesser than”, but in CPF>, the
cumulative frequency “ greater than” is used. For example; class limit 81 -85
greater than” (CPF>) of 17, consider the computation below
ELABORATE
65 55 51 49 32 35 47 43 37 53
31 32 44 34 40 78 35 36 33 30
51 40 39 47 46 43 47 29 34 48
28 31 36 48 41 57 39 61 51 57
36 35 52 61 47 59 42 59 31 48
45 52 47 59 53 66 43 45 53 29
EVALUATE
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Direction: Circle the letter of the correct answer.
1. The highest score is 110 and lowest score is 67. The range is:
a. 41 b. 42 c. 44 d. 43
5. The upper class limit of the highest class of item 1 using class interval of
item 4 is:
a. 100.5 b. 111.5 c. 113.5 d. 112.5
6. The lower class limit of the highest class of item 1 using class interval of
item 4 is:
a. 108.5 b. 107.5 c. 105.5 d. 106.5
7. There are 55 students who took the test. The cumulative frequency
“lesser than” of class limit 84-88, is 20, the cumulative percentage
frequency “lesser than: is:
a. 35% b. 37% c. 38% d. 36%
9. There are 40 students who took the test. The cumulative frequency
“greater than” of class limit, 75 -77 is 12, the cumulative percentage
frequency “greater than” is:
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
d. 31% of the cases got a score of 75 or above.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 7: MEASURES OF CENTRAL LOCATION AND OTHER POINT
MEASURES
Objectives:
find and interpret the measures of central location and other point
measures of a set of values or scores
determine the measures of central location and other point measures in
interpreting test scores.
use measure of central location and other point measures in interpreting
test scores.
EXPLORE
In layman’s term, what is meant by “average”
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
EXPLAIN
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
three measures can serve as an index to represent a set of numerical data or
set of scores or values as a whole.
Arithmetic Mean
The most widely used measure of central location is the arithmetic mean
Or simply mean. The mean of a set of numerical values is the sum of all values
in a score distribution divided by the number of scores or cases.
Formula: Mean = ∑x or = ∑x
N N
Where:
= is the mean
∑ = is the notation used to mean “ the summation of”
X = is the specific score or value, and
N = is the number of values or scores
= ∑x = 88 + 90 + 42 + 75 + 65 = 360 = 72
N 5 5
When the number of values or scores is large ( at least 30 ) and there are
scores that repeat, the set of scores is usually presented as a frequency
distribution. Suppose an English teacher wants to determine the performance
of her English 1 class in the English final exam. Shown below is the frequency
distribution of the final exam scores in English. In the first column are the
scores arranged in order (from highest to lowest or from lowest to highest). In
the second column are the frequency of each score. Finally, in the third column
are the product of each score and its frequency.
X f fX
94 1 94
91 3 273
90 5 450
89 8 712
87 9 783
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
83 8 664
81 6 486
79 5 395
76 3 228
72 2 144
N = 50 ∑fx 4,229
Formula: = ∑fX
N
= 4,229
50
= 84.58
= 192+135+294+351+468+528+300+189+168+63
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
79
= 2,688
79
= 34.03
Median
Scores: 87 86 85 82 80 79 78 74 72 70 68 65 60 59 56
Observe that the given ordered score distribution, there is only one
middle value, the score 74. By the definition of median, the median of the
above ordered score distribution is 74, that is, 74 is the value that separates
the upper half (upper 50%) from the lower half (lower 50%) of the class. There
are 7 pupils who scored above 74 and 7 pupils who scored below 74. Note also
that the median is one of the scores in the distribution.
Scores: 12 14 16 17 20 25 28 32 36 37 39 46 61 70
Observe that in the above ordered score distribution, there are two
middle values, the scores 28 and 32. By the definition of a median, the median
of the above ordered score distribution is:
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
28 + 32 60 = 30
2 2
That is, 30 is the value that separates the upper half (upper 50%) from
the lower half (lower 50%) of the class. There are 7 students who scored above
30 and 7 students who scored below 30. Note that the median is not one of the
scores in the distribution.
X f Cf<
35 1 60
29 2 59
27 4 57
26 5 53
24 7 48
22 11 41
20 12 30
19 7 18
18 6 11
15 4 5
11 1 1
N = 60
Since the position of the Md is n/2 = 60/2 = 30, there are two middle
most values, the 30th and the 31st scores. From the column, it can be seen that
the 30th score = 20 and the 31st score = 22. Thus, by the definition of the
median, the median of the frequency distribution is
Md = 20 + 22/ 2 = 42/2 = 21
This indicates that students with scores greater than 21 belong to the
lower 50% of the class.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Consider the following frequency distribution of grouped test scores in
History. Shown in the first column are the grouped scores arranged in
descending order while in the second column is the frequency of each group.
The third column shows the less than cumulative frequency (cf) , which
is obtained by counting casa up from the lowest score interval. This column
shows the position of every individual score in the ordered distribution of
grouped scores and, thus, will show the position of the middle most score or
scores (position of the median score = n/2)
X f Cf<
31 - 33 1 60
28 – 30 3 59
25 – 27 3 56
22 -2 4 6 53
19 – 21 8 47
16 – 18 11 39
13 – 15 10 28
10 – 12 7 18
7–9 6 11
4–6 4 5
1 -3 1 1
n = 60
Since the position of the median is n/60 = 60/2 = 30, there are two
middle most values, the 30th and the 31st scores. From the cf column, it can be
seen that the 30th and the 31st scores in the interval (16-18). Interval (16-18) is
called the median class, or the class containing the median, meaning the
median will range from 16 to 18. For this grouped data, the median can be
interpolated (or estimated) using the formula.
In the illustration above, the median class is the interval (16-18), thus
the values of
LL = 15.5
n = 60
ƒ = 28
ƒ = 11
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
I = 3
Md = LL + N/20 -f(b) 3
f(w)
This means that students with scores greater than 16.05 belong to the
upper 50% of the class and students with scores less than 16.05 belong to the
lower 50% of the class.
Mode
It may also happen that two or more values have the same frequency, for
example 34, 56, 34, 90, 56, 80,where the value most cited are 34 and 56. In
this case, there are two values of the mode, Mode 1 = 34 and Mode 2 = 56. This
given set of scores is an example of a bi-modal distribution.
For grouped data, the mode is the mid-value of the class having the
highest frequency. By observation, it is easy to approximate when there is a
small number of scores; it is not necessary to arrange the values. Despite the
advantages cited, the mode can only be determined when a limited number of
data is available. In some cases, the mode may not exist, where none of the
values are repeated.
Standard Deviation
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
The formula of standard deviation from ungrouped data using working
formula is as follows:
___________
SD = √ ∑(X - )²
N-1
Where: SD = Standard deviation
∑(X- ) = Sum of the squared difference of scores and mean
N = Number of cases
Mean Computation
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
To get ( X - ) = 80 - 70.85 = 9.15 ( sample computation for column 3 of
the table above)
_________
SD = √ ∑(X- - ) ²
N-1
_________
= √ 728.55
20-1
_________
= √ 728.55
19
= √ 38.34474
SD = 6.192313 or 6.19
SOLVING FOR THE MEAN, MEDIAN MODE AND STANDARD DEVIATION OF GROUPED
DATA USING THE MIPOINT METHOD
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Comparison of the Three Indices of Central Location
Skewed Data
Data can be "skewed", meaning it tends to have a long tail on one side or the
other:
Negatively Skew this
means that the mean and
median are found in the left
of the mode because
majority of the students are
above the mean or above
average. The scores are
pulled towards the right due
to the presence of more high
extreme scores.
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Normal Distribution
In normal distribution
or bell-shaped distribution
or symmetrical distribution
the mean, median and mode
have the same values.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
POSITIVELY SKEWED:
ELABORATE
X f
56 – 59 5
52 – 55 9
48 – 51 12
44 – 47 15
40 – 43 14
36 – 39 9
32 – 35 10
28 – 31 5
24 - 27 8
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
EVALUATE
3. The mode of these scores, 55,57 59, 59, 59, 60, 62, 63, 65, 67, 67, 70,
and 70
a. 59 b. 70 c. 67 d. 60
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
UNIT 8: GRADING AND LEARNING PROMOTION OF BASIC EDUCAYION
PROGRAM ( K -12 Curriculm)
EXPLORE
Objectives:
identify the three components of the grading system under the K to 12
Curriculum
solves for the grade of a learner
differentiate the grading system of DepEd Order No. 8 and DepEd
Order No. 31
EXPLAIN
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
What is the grading system
Step 1: Grades from all student work are added up. This results in the
total score for each component, namely Written Work, Performance
Tasks, and Quarterly Assessment.
Raw scores from each component have to be converted to a Percentage Score. This is to
ensure that values are parallel to each other.
Step 2: The sum for each component is converted to the Percentage
Score. To compute the Percentage Score (PS), divide the raw score by the
highest possible score then multiply the quotient by 100%. This is shown
below:
PERCENTAGE
SCORE (PS) = Learner’s total raw score x 100%
Highest possible score
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
AP
1 Written 30% 40% 20%
to Work
10 Performance 50% 40% 60%
Tasks
Quarterly 20% 20% 20%
Assessment
Step 4: The sum of the Weighted Scores in each component is the Initial
Grade. This Initial Grade will be transmuted using the given
transmutation table (see Appendix B) to get the Quarterly Grade (QG).
Step 5: The Quarterly Grade for each learning area is written in the
report card of the student.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Appendix B ( Transmutation Table)
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Written Work 2 22 25
Written Work 3 20 20
Written Work 4 17 20
Written Work 5 23 25
Written Work 6 26 30
Written Work 7 19 20
TOTAL 145 160
Performance Task 1 12 15
Performance Task2 13 15
Performance Task3 19 25
Performance Task4 15 20
Performance Task5 16 20
Performance Task6 25 25
TOTAL 100 120
Divide the total raw score by the highest possible score then multiply the
quotient by 100%.
PS of Written Work is 90.63.
Percentage Score (PS)=120 x 100%
PS of Performance Task is 83.33.
Percentage Score (PS)= 50x 100%
PS of Quarterly Assessment is 80.00.
STEPS
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
3. Convert Written Work for English Grade 4 is 30%
Percentage Weighted Score (WS)= 90.63 x 0.30
Scores to The Weighted Score of Written Work in 27.19.
Weighted Scores. Performance Tasks for English Grade 4 is 50%.
Multiply the Weighted Score (WS)= 83.33 x 0.50
Percentage Score The Weighted Score of Performance Task is 41.67.
by the weight of Quarterly Assessment for English Grade 4 is 20%.
the component Weighted Score (WS)= 80.00 x 0.20
indicated in Table The Weighted Score of Quarterly Assessment is 16.
4 and Table 5. (The scores can be found in the sample class record on Table
6.)
4. Add the Component Weighted Score
Weighted Scores Written Work=27.19 Performance Tasks= 41.67 Quarterly
of each Assessment= 16.00
component. The TOTAL 84.86
result will be the The Initial Grade is 84.86.
Initial Grade.
5. Transmute the The Initial Grade is 84.86 The Transmuted Grade is 90.
Initial Grade The Quarterly Grade in English for the 1st Quarter is 90.
using the This is reflected in the Report Card.
Transmutation
Table in
Appendix B.
For MAPEH, individual grades are given to each area, namely, Music,
Arts, Physical Education, and Health. The quarterly grade for MAPEH is
the average of the quarterly grades in the four areas.
Quarterly Grade = QG for Music + QG for Arts + QG for PE + QG for
Health (QG) for MAPEH divided by 4.
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
The General Average is computed by dividing the sum of all final grades by the
total number of learning areas. Each learning area has equal weight.
General = Sum of Final Grades of All Learning Areas
Average Total number of Learning Areas in a grade level
The Final Grade in each learning area and the General Average are reported as
whole numbers. Table 8 shows an example of the Final Grades of the different
learning areas and General Average of a Grade 4 student.
Learning Area
1 2 3 4 Final Grade
Filipino 80 89 86 84 85
English 89 90 92 87 90
Mathematics 82 85 83 83 83
Science 86 87 85 84 86
Araling Panlipunan 90 92 91 89 91
Edukasyon sa 89 93 90 88 90
Pagpapakatao
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Edukasyong 80 81 84 79 81
Pantahanan at
Pangkabuhayan
MAPEH 85 86 85 84 85
General Average 86
ELABORATE
Legend:
HPS – Highest Possible Score IG - Initial Grade
PS - Percentage Score FG - Final Grade
WS - Weighted Score
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
DEP ED ORDER 31. S. 2020
Written Works 40 50 30
Performance 60 50 70
Tasks
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Assessment Weight in Percentage
Component
Languages/ Science/ MAPEH/EPP/
AP/EsP Math TLE
Written Works 40 50 30
Performance 60 50 70
Tasks
Weight in Percentage
Technical/Vocational
and Livelihood
Academic Track
(TVL)/Sports/Arts and
Design Tracks
Assessm
Core Work
ent
Subje Immersion/Research/ Work
Compon All All
cts Business Enterprise Immersion/Re
ent Other Other
Simulation/ search
Subje Subje
Performance Exhibit/Perfor
cts cts
MAPEH/EPP/ mance
TLE
Written
40 40 50 30 30
Works
Perform
ance 60 60 50 70 70
Tasks
Transmutation of grades will still follow Appendix B of DO 8, s. 2015
Policies on retention and promotion will still follow provisions in DO 8, s. 2015
EVALUATE
Refer to the Elaborate Activities: Solve for the grade of the students not
considering the periodical examination. Use DepEd Order 31 in solving for the
grade.
REFERENCES
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2
Calmorin , L. (2011), Assessment of Student Learning 2, REX Book Store,
Manila Philippines
Downie, N.M. & Heath, R.W. (1984) Basic statistics method (5th ed.) New York,
Harper and Row Publishers
Kratwohl, D.R. Bloom, B.S., & Masia B.B. (1964) Taxonomy of educational
objectives, Handbook II Affective domain, New York: David McKay
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2