We have two sources in reading or writing a history these are the Primary and Secondary sources.

Primary sources are created by individuals who have witnessed or experienced the events firsthand.
For example, diaries, letters, original research studies, photographs, government records, and oral
histories. The main advantage of using primary sources is that they offer a first-hand account of
historical events, or they give you a direct insight of that historical events, allowing researchers to
gain a deeper understanding of the past. However, primary sources can be challenging to interpret, as
they often require contextual knowledge and historical understanding.

On the other hand, secondary sources are like the detectives who gather all the clues and put the
puzzle together. They're not directly involved in the events but they often collect, analyze, and
interpret information from primary sources. Secondary sources can be textbooks, articles,
documentaries, and academic papers. They provide a more comprehensive understanding of a topic as
they often viewed or analyze multiple primary sources, and also adding some interpretation or
additional insight.

While studying history we have encountered this book entitled "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" written
by Antonio Morga and annotated by Rizal. Primary sources like Morga's book are like eyewitness
accounts of historical events. It provide us with raw, authentic details straight from the people who
lived through those times. In this case, Morga, who was a Spanish historian and former governor of
the Philippines, recounts the events and society during that period. On the other hand, we have
secondary sources, such as the writings of the great Jose Rizal. He used Morga's book as a reference
to shed light on the Philippines' colonial past. Rizal analyzed, evaluated, and interpreted the primary
source to provide us with a modern perspective.

In conclusion, primary sources are the raw and real deal, straight from the source, while secondary
sources are the enhanced versions. It is essential to consider these two when conducting study or
seeking reliable information and primary sources like Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas," offer a
direct window into history, while secondary sources like Rizal's writings, help us navigate and
understand those primary sources from a modern context. Both primary and secondary sources are
important in conducting a study, as they provide different types of information about a particular topic
and by comparing and contrasting the two sources, researchers can gain a more comprehensive
understanding of a topic and evaluate the reliability and credibility of the information presented. The
two types of sources are important to use to create a well-rounded understanding of a topic.