Lesson 30: Data Analysis: Comparing and Contrasting Results, Interpreting Findings,

and Drawing Conclusions

DATA ANALYSIS OF A PEDAGOGICAL INVESTIGATION: COMPARING AND CONTRASTING
RESULTS, INTERPRETING FINDINGS, AND DRAWING CONCLUSIONS1
Norpo’latova Maftuna
2007
Exercise 1: Comparing and Contrasting Results
Read the following scenarios and answer the questions based on the data provided.
Scenario 1:
A pedagogical investigation was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two different vocabulary teaching
strategies. The data collected includes pre-test and post-test scores of two groups: Group A (taught using Strategy A)
and Group B (taught using Strategy B).
Data:
Group A: Group B:
Pre-test mean score: 60 Pre-test mean score: 55
Post-test mean score: 75 Post-test mean score: 70

Questions:
1. Calculate the improvement in scores for each group.
2. Compare the improvement in scores between Group A and Group B.
3. Based on the data, which vocabulary teaching strategy appears to be more effective?
Scenario 2:
A pedagogical investigation aimed to evaluate the impact of incorporating multimedia materials in listening
comprehension lessons. The data collected includes student feedback on their listening comprehension performance
before and after the intervention.
Data:

Before the intervention: After the intervention:

75% of students reported moderate confidence 85% of students reported high confidence in their listening
in their listening skills. skills.
25% of students reported low confidence in their 15% of students reported moderate confidence in their
listening skills. listening skills.

Questions:
1. Compare the distribution of confidence levels before and after the intervention.
2. Analyze the change in confidence levels after the intervention.

1
 3. What conclusions can you draw about the impact of incorporating multimedia materials on students'
confidence in listening comprehension?
Scenario 1:
- Group A:
- Pre-test mean score: 60
- Post-test mean score: 75
- Group B:
- Pre-test mean score: 55
- Post-test mean score: 70
Calculating the Improvement:
- Group A:
Improvement = Post-test mean score - Pre-test mean score = 75 - 60 = 15
- Group B:
Improvement = Post-test mean score - Pre-test mean score = 70 - 55 = 15
Comparison of Improvements:
Both Group A and Group B showed an improvement of 15 points in their scores.
Effectiveness of Teaching Strategy:
Both strategies, A and B, demonstrate the same level of improvement based on the data provided. No clear conclusion
can be drawn regarding the comparative effectiveness of the two teaching strategies solely based on test score
improvement.
Scenario 2:
- Before Intervention:
- 75% moderate confidence
- 25% low confidence
- After Intervention:
- 85% high confidence
- 15% moderate confidence
Comparing the Distribution:
The intervention led to a shift from moderate/low to high confidence among the students.
Change in Confidence Levels:
The intervention resulted in a majority of students reporting high confidence, indicating a positive impact on student
confidence.
Impact of Multimedia Materials:
The incorporation of multimedia materials appears to have significantly increased students' confidence in listening
comprehension.
 Exercise 2: Interpreting Findings
Read the following findings from a pedagogical investigation and answer the questions based on your
interpretation.
Findings:
A pedagogical investigation focused on the impact of teacher feedback on student writing performance. The
qualitative analysis of students' written work revealed the following themes:

• Students who received specific feedback on grammar and organization showed significant improvement in
their writing skills.

• Students who received positive feedback on their ideas and creativity demonstrated increased motivation and
engagement.

• Students who received no feedback or only general feedback did not show noticeable progress in their writing
performance.
Questions:
1. How do specific feedback on grammar and organization impact students' writing skills?
2. What effect does positive feedback on ideas and creativity have on student motivation and engagement?
3. What conclusions can you draw about the importance of personalized and targeted feedback in enhancing
student writing performance?

Specific Feedback on Grammar and Organization:

- Specific feedback on grammar and organization leads to a significant improvement in students' writing skills,
indicating a focused and structured approach to writing.
Positive Feedback on Ideas and Creativity:
- Positive feedback on ideas and creativity enhances student motivation and engagement, suggesting that
acknowledging and fostering creativity contributes to student investment in writing tasks.
Importance of Personalized and Targeted Feedback:
- The findings underscore the critical role of personalized and targeted feedback in cultivating both the technical and
motivational aspects of student writing performance. Such feedback appears essential in bolstering students' skill
development and enthusiasm for writing tasks.

Exercise 3: Drawing Conclusions

Read the following research scenario and answer the questions by drawing conclusions based on the findings.
Research Scenario:
A pedagogical investigation examined the effectiveness of using cooperative learning strategies in a mixed-level
English language classroom.
The data analysis revealed the following:
 • Students who engaged in cooperative learning activities showed higher levels of participation and interaction
during classroom tasks.

• Students' English language proficiency levels did not significantly affect their engagement in cooperative
learning.

• Cooperative learning contributed to a positive classroom climate and fostered a sense of inclusivity among
students.
Questions:
1. How does cooperative learning impact student participation and interaction in the classroom?
2. What can be inferred about the benefits of cooperative learning regardless of students' English language
proficiency levels?
3. What conclusions can be drawn about the role of cooperative learning in creating a positive classroom
environment?

Impact on Student Participation and Interaction:

- Cooperative learning strategies positively influence student participation and interaction, fostering greater
engagement and collaboration among students during classroom activities.
Benefits Regardless of Proficiency Levels:
- The findings suggest that cooperative learning is beneficial across varied English language proficiency levels,
implying its potential to serve as an inclusive and effective instructional approach.
Role in Creating a Positive Classroom Environment:
- Cooperative learning contributes to a positive classroom climate, fostering inclusivity and a sense of collaboration
among students. This indicates its potential to create a supportive and engaging learning environment regardless of
language proficiency.