You are on page 1of 25

Modeling & Analysis of Power

System Contingencies

A Key to Design an Efficient and Secure


Power System
CONTENTS

Introduction

Types of Violation

Contingency Analysis Aspects

States of Security Analysis

Remedial Actions

Static Security Levels of Power System

Methods of Contingency Analysis

Fast Decoupled Load Flow

Simulink Results and Discussion

Future Recommendations

Conclusion

References
INTRODUCTION


Existing Situation whose result is unknown or unpredictable

Function in Modern Energy Management System

Information about static security

Major Activity in Power System planning operation

Used to calculate violations

Line Outage Distribution Factor (LODF)

Power Transfer Distribution Factor (PTDF)

Managing, creating, analyzing and reporting lists of contingencies and
associated violations
TYPES OF VIOLATIONS


Line contingency and generator contingency
• Low Voltage Violations

Occurs at buses

Operating range of voltage is 0.95 to 1.05 p.u
• Line MVA limits Violations

Occurs in System

Due to increase of current flow

Lines are designed to withstand 125% MVA limit

80-90% limit crossing as alarm signaling
ASPECTS OF CONTINGENCY
ANALYSIS

System to with stand equipment failure

Overloads in contingency conditions

(N-1) contingency analysis simulation

Prioritize Transmission Planning

Annual Maintenance plan & schedule for power system
STATES OF SECURITY ANALYSIS


Involves four operating states
• Optimal Dispatch
• Post Contingency
• Secure Dispatch
• Secure Post Contingency
STATES OF SECURITY ANALYSIS


Optimal Dispatch
• Available to contingency
• Optimal With respect to Economic operation
STATES OF SECURITY ANALYSIS


Post Contingency
• State after contingency
• This Condition has a security Violation
STATES OF SECURITY ANALYSIS


Secure Dispatch
• System with no contingency
• Account for security violations
STATES OF SECURITY ANALYSIS


Secure Post-Contingency
• Contingency at base condition after corrections
REMEDIAL ACTIONS


Shunt Capacitor Bank

Generation Re-Dispatch

Load Shedding

On-Load Tap changing Transformer (OLTC)

Distributed Generation

Islanding
STATIC SECURITY LEVELS OF POWER
SYSTEM
METHODS OF CONTINGENCY
ANALYSIS

Two Main Approaches of Contingency Selection
• Direct Methods
• Indirect Methods


Line Outage is more complex than Generator Outage

Steady State Operation Immediately or After Automatic Controls
FAST DECOUPLED LOAD
FLOW
SIMULINK RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Figure. 01 Base Case for 5 Bus System Table.01 Pre-Contingency Data of 5 Bus System
SIMULINK RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Table.02 Pre-Contingency Power Flow of 5 Buses


SIMULINK RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Figure. 02 When line 2-4 get open Table.03 Post-Contingency Data of 5 Bus System
with Line 2-4 Outage
SIMULINK RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Table.04 Post-Contingency Power Flow of 5 Buses


with Line 2-4 Outage
SIMULINK RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Table.05 Post-Contingency Data of 5 Bus System


Figure. 03 When Generator 02 get open with Generator 02 Outage
SIMULINK RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Table.04 Post-Contingency Power Flow of 5 Buses


with Generator 02 Outage
FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS


Incorporating Transient Stability Analysis

Data Integrity

Time Synchronization

N-2 Contingencies Should be Evaluated

Use FACT Devices

Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques

Incorporating Renewable Energy Sources
CONCLUSION


Removes limit violations in system

Strengthen Initial Basic Plan

Improves system operator ability

Helps busy power system operator
LITERATURE REVIEW


K. Bhattacharya, M.
Bollen, and J. Daalder,
Operation of
Restructured Power
LITERATURE REVIEW

Wood, A. J.; Wallenberg, B. F., “Power Generation, Operation and Control”. 2nd ed., New York/USA:
John Wiley& Sons, 1996, pp. 410-432.

Arthur R. Bergen, “Power Systems Analysis”, Prentice-Hall Series in Electrical and Computer
Engineering, 1986, pp. 130-134.

YaserNadhum Al-Aani, “Generation Rescheduling for Alleviating Overloads caused by Contingency”, M.
Sc. Thesis.Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq, 1999.

Emtethal N. Abdallah “Contingency Ranking in StaticSecurity Assessment”, Eights Middle East Power
Systems Conference MEPCON‟2001, Cairo, Egypt, pp 13-19, December 2001.

F. Albuyeh, A. Bose and B. Heath, “Reactive Power Considerations in Automatic Contingency Selection”.
IEEE Trans. On Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS – 101, No.1,pp. 107-112, Jan. 1982

P. Kundur, Power Systems Stability and Control, NewYork, McGraw Hill Inc., 1994.

Shekhappa G. Ankaliki, S. I. Katti,A. D. Kulkarni,T. Ananthapadmanabha “Contingency Analysis of
reduced 220 kvkptcl system using MATLAB SIMULINK MODEL”Asian Journal of Current Engineering and
Maths1: 6 Nov –Dec (2012) 378 - 382.

D P Kothari, I J Nagrath, “Modern Power System Analysis”, 3rd ed., New delhi: Tata McGraw Hill
THANKS
!QUESTIONS???

You might also like