This document outlines criteria for weighting different aspects of a report or project. It provides descriptions for rating performance on a scale of 0 to 100 in the following areas: use of evidence and referencing (20%), selection and application of tools (20%), and justification of option choice (40%). Higher ratings are given for using a wider range of sources, accurately referencing work, appropriately selecting analytical tools, and thoroughly justifying strategic rather than obvious options based on evidence.
This document outlines criteria for weighting different aspects of a report or project. It provides descriptions for rating performance on a scale of 0 to 100 in the following areas: use of evidence and referencing (20%), selection and application of tools (20%), and justification of option choice (40%). Higher ratings are given for using a wider range of sources, accurately referencing work, appropriately selecting analytical tools, and thoroughly justifying strategic rather than obvious options based on evidence.
This document outlines criteria for weighting different aspects of a report or project. It provides descriptions for rating performance on a scale of 0 to 100 in the following areas: use of evidence and referencing (20%), selection and application of tools (20%), and justification of option choice (40%). Higher ratings are given for using a wider range of sources, accurately referencing work, appropriately selecting analytical tools, and thoroughly justifying strategic rather than obvious options based on evidence.
Weighting 20% Criteria Non-submission Fail Satisfactory Good Commendable Excellent Outstanding
0 0-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-100
Use of and Some use of Some use of Use of evidence Use of evidence Evidence is drawn Evidence is drawn referencing of evidence from evidence from from largely from reliable from a wide range from a wide range appropriate quality largely non reliable largely generally generally reliable sources. A wide of complementary of complementary and range of or dated sources. reliable sources. sources. A good range of sources is and sometimes and sometimes sources Referencing is Possible over range of sources is used. Accurate contradictory contradictory present in few reliance on a used. Generally referencing is sources. sources. areas of the report. limited range of accurate present in all areas Referencing is Referencing is sources. referencing is of the report. comprehensive and comprehensive and Referencing is present in all areas accurate accurate present in most of the report. throughout the throughout the 20% NS areas of the report. report. report. selection and Some tools are used Tools and Tools are used and Appropriate tools Excellent selection Outstanding application of but the selection frameworks are the selection is are selected. They and linked use of selection and appropriate tools indicates that the used. The related to the are used in a way tools leads to the application of tools and frameworks for student does not effectiveness of the appropriate that leads to a wide development of a and frameworks analysis and understand their use of tools is purpose. The variety of options wide range of which leads to the development of a use. Tools may be limited. The range effectiveness of the options that are development of a range of options used but are used of options is use of tools original and wide range of inappropriately and obvious and develops a range of plausible options that are do not help to gain limited. varied options. original and 40% NS insight. innovative. Justification for the Options are Some attempt to Good use is made Good use is made Excellent use is Outstanding use is choice of a selected generated but the justify the choice of evaluation to of evaluation to made of evaluation made of option choice is either not but little reference select and justify a select and justify a to select and justify appropriate made or not to the analysis or strategic option. strategic option. a strategic option. It methods of justified evidence of The options and Some attempt is is closely linked to evaluation to select evaluation of the choice are strategic made to go beyond the analysis. A clear and justify the most options. Choice may rather than the obvious attempt is made to appropriate tend to the operational. Choice go beyond the strategic option. operational. is likely to be obvious This is likely to be obvious not an obvious choice but one that could provide an 40% NS innovative solution.