Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract In-flight experiments for laminar boundary layer stabilization are con-
ducted on a laminar flow wing glove, mounted on a manned motor glider. A single
DBD plasma actuator is operated on the pressure side of the glove to delay natural
laminar-turbulent transition while an infra red (IR) camera is mounted below the
wing allowing a measurement of the spatial development of the transition. Besides
the quantification of the flow control result, this article shows postprocessing strate-
gies for perspective camera calibration with curved surfaces, image dewarping and
for inhomogeneous surface heating.
1 Introduction
Bernhard Simon
TU Darmstadt, Center of Smart Interfaces, e-mail: simon@csi.tu-darmstadt.de
Sven Grundmann
TU Darmstadt, Center of Smart Interfaces, e-mail: grundmann@csi.tu-darmstadt.de
1
2 Bernhard Simon and Paul Schnabel and Sven Grundmann
capability to image even the small flow structures of cross-flow transition with IR
thermography. The development of small IR camera models with non-cooled sensor
arrays and high image resolution allows their use for new applications and allows
the much more flexible installation of the camera.
Plasma Actuators have shown their ability to delay laminar-turbulent transition in
flight experiments [2]. IR thermography is an excellent measurement tool to deter-
mine the effect of laminar flow control in flight as it is a non intrusive measurement
method with a high spatial resolution. While previous measurements of transition
control using plasma actuators determined the transition delay only with point wise
sensors at a single spanwise position, IR technology gives more insight into the
spanwise development of the flow control effect.
2 Experimental Setup
The following section describes the experimental setup, used for the in-flight exper-
iments. A Grob G109b motorized glider, manned with two crew members, is used
for the in-flight experiments. The aircraft combines the advantages of intermittent
vibrationless gliding flight with a 96 kW engine for autonomous take-off and alti-
tude gain. The sweep angle at the leading edge is almost zero, minimizing spanwise
pressure gradients and creating almost two-dimensional flow along the chord such
that amplified Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) waves are known to dominate any transi-
tion.
socket for
wing glove LEADING EDGE
boom
INBO AR D
IR emitter storage
heated insert IR camera pod pod
plexi glass
insert maintainance
cover
transition trip
DBD controller
(covered)
Fig. 1 Sketch of the wing glove, pressure side, instrumented with sensors.
2.3 Sensors
Along the outboard portion of the wing glove 64 pressure taps are distributed over
suction and pressure side to capture the pressure distribution during flight, acquired
at 10 Hz by a Pressure Systems ESP-64HD pressure transducer. A single boom pro-
truding upstream into the flow is installed on a front socket on the leading edge to
enable the measurement of static and total pressure for calculating the air speed.
Two pressure sensors determine the static and dynamic pressure at a second
boom, mounted upstream of the left wing. The temperature is measured with a
PT1000 temperature sensor and a humidity sensor is installed to determine the actual
4 Bernhard Simon and Paul Schnabel and Sven Grundmann
air density. A Dornier Flight Log, which is a wind vane following the incident flow,
is mounted on the boom and provides the angle of attack α as well as the sideslip
angle β . The ambient flow conditions encountered during flight are acquired at a
sampling frequency of 100 Hz by a NI6221 USB A/D converter, synchronized to the
wing-glove sensor signals with a digital trigger.
3 IR Measurement Technique
1 λ
q̇conv = α(TW − T∞ ); α = c f U∞ (1)
2 ν
while α is a function of the friction coefficient c f , the freestream velocity U∞ , the
heat conduction coefficient of the fluid λ and the kinematic viscosity ν.
If the heat transfer to the fluid q̇conv is held constant e.g. by constant electrical
heating and the wall friction c f increases due to laminar-turbulent transition, the
wall temperature TW will decrease. This change in wall temperature ∆ TW can be
measured by the IR camera due to a lower heat radiation q̇rad . This relation of heat
transfer and shear stress is called Reynolds Analogy [5]. For the signal-to-noise ratio
and the spatial resolution of this measurement technique the heat conduction on and
below the surface q̇cond is essential (Fig. 3(a)). A high heat conduction q̇cond in wall
normal direction is important to guide the heat flux of the (electric) heater q̇heater
to the surface for providing strong signals while heat conduction in wall parallel
direction should be low in order to avoid loss of resolution through a smearing effect.
Such a smearing effect could occur at regions with strong temperature gradients as
shown schematically in Fig. 3(b). It shows a Tollmien-Schlichting wave dominated
transition on an unswept wing. The transition takes place in a straight line while
premature transition can be triggered by a turbulator (roughness, bugs, disturbance
source) which results in a turbulent wedge.
TW turbulator
U∞, T∞ ˙qconv ˙qrad
U∞
Three different types of image distortion occur due to camera viewing angle, curved
wing surface and radial lens distortion. The software Labview NI Vision includes
algorithms for trapezoidal and plane distortion. Their application requires using a
calibration target as known from the calibration of a PIV setup. A similar calibration
target for IR applications was developed. It consists of a 200 mm × 300 mm 0.3 mm
thin aluminium sheet, covered with a polyurethane foil with holes arranged in a dot
pattern. Due to the significant difference in the emission factor ε of both materials,
the dot pattern can clearly be captured by the IR camera (Fig. 4(a)). The thin format
of the target allows for applying it on the curved wing glove surface. Fig. 4(b) shows
the dewarped IR image while the dots are evenly distributed, demonstrating the
correct application of the algorithm.
−100
−50
z [mm]
0
50
100
0.4 0.5 0.6
x/c
(a) Distorted calibration image (b) Dewarped calibration image
The surface heating is realized with an electrical heating foil (total thickness
0.2 mm). In order to avoid heat loss to the wing glove structure, a 1 mm polyurethane
hard foam is glued below the heating foil while a thin aluminium sheet of 0.3 mm
thickness on top of the foil homogenizes the heat distribution on the aerodynamic
surface (Fig. 5(a)). A layer of 0.08 mm thin polyurethane foil on top of the alu-
minium sheet enhances the IR emissivity of the element. All presented measure-
ments have been conducted with a heating power of q̇heater = 1200 W/m2 , which
results in a temperature difference between structure and flow TW − T∞ = ∆ T of
about 10 K, depending on the angle of attack. Three thermo couples continuously
capture the temperature of the aluminium plate and of the flow. Fig. 5(b) shows the
uncalibrated and dewarped IR signal intensity I of the heated insert during flight
with a fully turbulent flow. Bright regions indicate higher temperatures while darker
areas indicate colder areas. To provide a fully turbulent flow, the boundary layer is
tripped artificially upstream of the measurement insert. This measurement captures
all features of the inhomogeneously distributed heating since the wall friction varies
IR Measurements of Laminar BL Stabilization with DBD Plasma Actuators 7
only slightly along the streamwise direction. The heating technique applied is not
able to provide a homogeneous wall temperature. A thicker aluminium sheet would
improve the uniformity of the temperature distribution but in this case a total insert
thickness of 1.5 mm limits the design possibilities. A typical IR measurement of
TS-wave dominated natural laminar-turbulent transition is shown in Fig. 5(c). The
flow direction is from left to right and a turbulent wedge is created on purpose at
y = −40 mm. The unevenly distributed surface heating makes the detection of the
boundary-layer transition difficult. A normalization of the raw data helps to over-
come this problem. A surface temperature measurement, obtained with heating and
a fully turbulent boundary layer (Fig. 5(b)), serves as a reference for the normaliza-
tion. The pixelwise normalization of untripped measurements (Fig. 5(c)) with this
reference image removes the footprint of the heating foil from the data. Fig. 5(d)
now clearly shows the spanwise course of the transition location around x/c = 0.46
including the turbulent wedge. This measurement result shows a very similar result
to the expected case discussed in Fig. 3(b).
−100
−50
z [mm]
polyurethane foil
0
aluminium sheet
heating foil 50
foam/insulation 100
0.4 0.5 0.6
x/c
(a) Design of the heated insert (b) Signal intensity with fully turbulent flow
−100 −100
−50 −50
z [mm]
z [mm]
0 0
50 50
100 100
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6
x/c x/c
(c) Signal intensity with transition, raw data (d) Signal intensity with transition, normalized
For quantitative statements a closer look at the signal intensity distribution is nec-
essary. Fig. 6(a) shows a line plot of the data between the black horizontal lines in
Fig. 5(d) around y = 30 mm. The data were averaged across 20 pixels in spanwise
direction and all values are normalized to the maximum signal intensity Imax . Lam-
inar regions result in a higher temperature while the surface below a turbulent flow
is colder. As a comparison the development of the skin friction coefficient c f in the
boundary layer is schematically sketched in Fig. 6(b). The position of the minimum
in skin friction c f corresponds to the highest signal intensity in Fig. 6(a). The char-
acteristic peak of the skin friction c f at the end of the transition process results in a
signal-intensity minimum at x/c = 0.59. For the discussion of the transition location
and of the transition delay it is useful to determine characteristic points in the transi-
tion process. First the maximum negative gradient of the curve in Fig. 6(a) is deter-
mined (marked with a vertical black line). This point is called transmid, indicating
the transition process is still in progress. Two other characteristic points, transon
and transoff describe the transition onset and the end of the transition process. The
points are determined by calculating the point of intersection between the slope of
the maximum negative gradient and a horizontal curve through the maximum and
minimum, respectively [4].
1
transon
BL thickness δ
transmid U∞
0.95 transoff
laminar transition turbulent
I/Imax
0.9
friction coefficient cf
0.85
0.8
0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6
x/c flow direction
different angles of attack (α1 < α2 ). The characteristic points transon, transmid and
transoff move downstream with higher angles of attack as the flow becomes more
stable due to a favorable negative pressure gradient. Both curves are normalized with
the maximum intensity Imax . There is a noticeable difference in the signal amplitude
of both measurements because the case with lower angle of attack has been acquired
earlier during one gliding flight, which results in lower air and surface temperatures.
However, the position of the calculated characteristic points of the transition process
are not influenced by this effect. The flow control effect on the transition location is
1
α2 transon 1
PAon
transmid
0.95 transoff
0.95
I/Imax
I/Imax
0.9
α1 0.9
0.85 0.85
PA
off
0.8 0.8
0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6
x/c x/c
(a) Transition for different angles of attack α (b) Transition with/without actuation at α1
−100 −100
−50 −50
z [mm]
z [mm]
0 0
50 50
100 100
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6
x/c x/c
(c) PA off (d) PA on
shown in Fig. 7(b) where the plasma actuator is operated with constant forcing. The
laminar-turbulent transition, characterized by transon and transoff, is shifted about
3% downstream, which was also measured with surface mounted microphones and
explained more in detail by Duchmann [2]. In contrast to the microphone array
sensor, IR thermography is capable of capturing the spanwise distribution of the
flow control result. Figures 7(c) and 7(d) show the results of the measurements for
the presented case with and without actuation. The figures show that transition takes
10 Bernhard Simon and Paul Schnabel and Sven Grundmann
place at an almost constant streamwise location for each case but with a noticeable
offset between the two.
5 Conclusions
References