Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Citation
Peiyu Wang, Yin Li, Haibo Sun, Zhengshuai Zhu, Shilei Liu. The influence of body mass index on
perioperative complications in esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.
PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018085853 Available from:
http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018085853
Review question
Does BMI have an effect on the incidence of individual complications for patients undergoing
esophagectomy for cancer?
Searches
PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library will be searched for relevant literature, from the earliest
available dates to December 31st, 2017.
Participants/population
Patients with esophageal cancer who have undergone esophagectomy.
Intervention(s), exposure(s)
Patient BMI, calculated and classified according to the World Health Organization criteria: underweight:
BMI<18.5 kg/m2; normal weight: BMI 18.50–24.99 kg/m2; overweight: BMI 25.00–29.99 kg/m2; obesity:
BMI?30.00 kg/m2.
Comparator(s)/control
Patients with normal weights will be the preferred comparators, although different categories of BMI will also
be compared with each other.
Primary outcome(s)
(1) Pulmonary complications or pneumonia;
(2) Cardiac complications, arrhythmia or myocardial infarction;
(3) Anastomotic leakage;
(4) Wound infection;
(5) Chylous leakage;
(6) Thromboembolic complications or pulmonary embolus.
Secondary outcome(s)
Perioperative mortality.
Page: 1 / 3
PROSPERO
International prospective register of systematic reviews
Funding sources/sponsors
Mr Peiyu Wang is the sponsor and also a researcher for this meta-analysis
As the main supporter of this research, Dr Yin Li will provide assistance in the conduct of the review
Dr Haibo Sun and Dr Shilei Liu will both also act as consultants, with expertise in the field of statistics
Mr Zhengshuai Zhu will provide additional support
Conflicts of interest
None specified.
Language
English
Page: 2 / 3
PROSPERO
International prospective register of systematic reviews
Country
China
Stage of review
Review_Ongoing
Details of any existing review of the same topic by the same authors
Stage of review at time of this submission
Data extraction No No
Risk of bias (quality) assessment No No
Data analysis No No
Versions
28 March 2018
PROSPERO
This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good
faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration
record, any associated files or external websites.
Page: 3 / 3