You are on page 1of 10

USER GUIDE FOR THE ITEM ANALYSIS TEMPLATE © Balajadia 2014

General Directions:
1. Supply the "Worksheet" heading with the necessary data for Division, District, School, Subject, Grade-Section, Exam Title, Period, School Year, Name of Teacher.
2. Arrange checked and scored test papers from highest to lowest scorers.
3. Separate the highest 27% and the lowest 27%. Indicate the total number of students and the number of highest 27% in the "Worksheet" accordingly.
4. Tally the responses of students in the highest 27% (vertical) per item number (horizontal) in the yellow cells. Encode "1" for a correct answer and "0" for a wrong answer. Please, note that if you leave
student 1 blank on a particular item, it means that there are no data for that item.
5. Do step 4 for the lowest 27% in the pink cells.
6. Click the "Main Report" tab below to check the final report ready for interpretation. There is nothing to modify in this page.

Guide for Interpretation


1. Accept as it is. - No revision is needed because the level of difficulty and the discriminating power are enough. Retain the item and can be used again in future exams.
2. Accepted with very slight revision. - You can right away accept and retain the item or make little changes depending on the level of difficulty.
3. Accepted with slight revision. - The item is retained with slight increase or decrease of difficulty as regards the P.
4. May be accepted with minor revision. - The item may be retained or discarded as how you personally evaluate it. If retained, the level of difficulty and choices may be changed.
5. Major revision on the stem / choices. - If you think the item will be ratained, paraphrase the stem and replace the choices which no one chose for an answer.
6. Needs major revision or discarded. - Total paraphrasing of the stem and replacement of non-selected choices should be made. Better yet, discard the item.
7. Totally discard. - The item has to be discarded because it is either too easy or too difficult and is unable to distinguish the low performers from the high performers.
Notes: There are locked cells which you cannot modify to totally prevent errors and misencoding.The "Main Report" sheet is protected, therefore, no modification is necessary.

Instruction for writing the descriptive analysis


A. On the difficulty level of items
1. Group together the items having the same difficulty levels and infer on the topics or competencies the students achieved.
2. Highlight the items of "moderate difficulty" and explain that these items can challenge the students enough to think analytically and critically. Nitko and Brookhart (2011) explain that items with
moderate difficulty are better than those which are very easy or very difficult. In this way, students are genuinely tested of their analytical and critical thinking skills.
3. You may also describe easy items to be indicators of most learned concepts, likewise, difficult items signal the least learned competencies.
B. On the discrimination indices of items
1. Group together the items having the same discrimination indices and infer on the item on its ability to distinguish who thinks more analytically or don't.
2. Items that are very discriminating should be emphasized to discuss the credibility of the test in eliciting authentic learning abilities of students.
3. You may also mention about those which are discriminating and moderately discriminating to be reconsidered after some necessary revision.
4. Infer on the resulting items being non-discriminating and questionable.
C. On the final decision
1. Group together the items having the same decisions and infer on each item on its validity, reliability, and objectivity.
2. Commend the items that are to be accepted and retained right away.
3. Cite examples of revision of some items if there are.
4. Write a general impression of the entire test.

Printing and submission


1. Print the "Main Report" without any modification. Study the table(s).
2. Click the "Interpretation" tab below and accomplish your discussion as specified therein. Print.
3. Submit your report in the following order:
3.1 Main Report
3.2 Interpretation and Desriptive Analysis Report
3.3. Copy of the TOS and Test Paper with correct answers.
Division: Division of Pampanga District: MINALIN CLUSTER 6 School: STO. ROSARIO HIGH SCHOOL

Subject / Grade - Section READING AND WRITING SKILLS Total Number of Students: 127 ito lang po ang ieenter
Exam Title / Period / School Year FIRST QUARTERLY EXAMINATION / S.Y. 2023-2024 Number of highest scorers (27%): 34 automatic
Name of Teacher MARIA CRISTINA M. FERNANDEZ Number of lowest scorers (27%): 34 automatic
© Balajadia 2014
HIGHEST SCORERS LOWEST SCORERS
Total Total
item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 item/SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Correct Correct
1 34 34 1 19 19
2 24 24 2 19 19
3 20 20 3 7 7
4 34 34 4 26 26
5 15 15 5 12 12
6 34 34 6 12 12
7 30 30 7 15 15
8 33 33 8 30 30
9 20 20 9 16 16
10 31 31 10 20 20
11 25 25 11 15 15
12 33 33 12 15 15
13 25 25 13 24 24
14 25 25 14 8 8
15 17 17 15 7 7
16 32 32 16 21 21
17 34 34 17 30 30
18 16 16 18 12 12
19 33 33 19 21 21
20 32 32 20 18 18
21 30 30 21 15 15
22 20 20 22 14 14
23 33 33 23 16 16
24 33 33 24 15 15
25 33 33 25 20 20
26 21 21 26 8 8
27 30 30 27 14 14
28 34 34 28 25 25
29 32 32 29 17 17
30 28 28 30 15 15
31 20 20 31 8 8
32 25 25 32 5 5
33 11 11 33 10 10
34 8 8 34 9 9
35 20 20 35 16 16
36 31 31 36 6 6
37 24 24 37 9 9
38 19 19 38 13 13
39 11 11 39 9 9
40 21 21 40 12 12
41 19 19 41 12 12
42 33 33 42 14 14
43 30 30 43 14 14

© Balajadia 2014
44 13 13 44 4 4
45 27 27 45 12 12
46 9 9 46 9 9
47 28 28 47 20 20
48 26 26 48 8 8
49 13 13 49 7 7
50 28 28 50 15 15
Total>>> 1257 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

© Balajadia 2014
Department of Education - Region III
Division of Pampanga
MINALIN CLUSTER 6
STO. ROSARIO HIGH SCHOOL

ITEM ANALYSIS IN READING AND WRITING SKILLS

FIRST QUARTERLY EXAMINATION / S.Y. 2023-2024


Exam Title / School Year

Total Students (100%): Name of Teacher: MARIA CRISTINA M. FERNANDEZ


127 Highest Scorers (27%): 34 Lowest Scorers (27%): 34 69 page 1/2

Total Total Total Difficulty Index Discrimination Index


Item # Correct Correct Correct Decision
(high) (low) (high+low) P Interpretation D Interpretation

1 34 19 53 0.77 Easy 0.44 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.


2 24 19 43 0.63 Easy 0.15 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
3 20 7 27 0.39 Difficult 0.38 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
4 34 26 60 0.87 Very Easy 0.23 Discriminating 5.Major revision on the stem or choices.
5 15 12 27 0.39 Difficult 0.09 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
6 34 12 46 0.67 Easy 0.64 Very Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
7 30 15 45 0.66 Easy 0.44 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
8 33 30 63 0.92 Very Easy 0.09 Moderately Discriminating 6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
9 20 16 36 0.52 Moderately Difficult 0.12 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
10 31 20 51 0.74 Easy 0.32 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
11 25 15 40 0.58 Moderately Difficult 0.29 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
12 33 15 48 0.70 Easy 0.52 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
13 25 24 49 0.71 Easy 0.03 Moderately Discriminating 5.Major revision on the stem or choices.
14 25 8 33 0.48 Moderately Difficult 0.50 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
15 17 7 24 0.35 Difficult 0.29 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
16 32 21 53 0.77 Easy 0.32 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
17 34 30 64 0.93 Very Easy 0.12 Moderately Discriminating 6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
18 16 12 28 0.41 Difficult 0.12 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
19 33 21 54 0.79 Easy 0.35 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
20 32 18 50 0.73 Easy 0.41 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
21 30 15 45 0.66 Easy 0.44 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
22 20 14 34 0.50 Moderately Difficult 0.17 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
23 33 16 49 0.71 Easy 0.50 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
24 33 15 48 0.70 Easy 0.52 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
25 33 20 53 0.77 Easy 0.38 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
26 21 8 29 0.42 Moderately Difficult 0.38 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
27 30 14 44 0.64 Easy 0.47 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
28 34 25 59 0.86 Very Easy 0.26 Discriminating 5.Major revision on the stem or choices.
29 32 17 49 0.71 Easy 0.44 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
30 28 15 43 0.63 Easy 0.38 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
31 20 8 28 0.41 Difficult 0.35 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
32 25 5 30 0.44 Moderately Difficult 0.58 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
33 11 10 21 0.31 Difficult 0.03 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
34 8 9 17 0.25 Difficult -0.03 Moderately Discriminating 6.Needs major revision or may be discarded.
35 20 16 36 0.52 Moderately Difficult 0.12 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
36 31 6 37 0.54 Moderately Difficult 0.73 Very Discriminating 1.Accepted as it is.
37 24 9 33 0.48 Moderately Difficult 0.44 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
38 19 13 32 0.47 Moderately Difficult 0.17 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
39 11 9 20 0.29 Difficult 0.06 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
40 21 12 33 0.48 Moderately Difficult 0.26 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
41 19 12 31 0.45 Moderately Difficult 0.20 Moderately Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
42 33 14 47 0.69 Easy 0.55 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
43 30 14 44 0.64 Easy 0.47 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.
44 13 4 17 0.25 Difficult 0.26 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
45 27 12 39 0.57 Moderately Difficult 0.44 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
46 9 9 18 0.26 Difficult 0.00 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
47 28 20 48 0.70 Easy 0.23 Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
48 26 8 34 0.50 Moderately Difficult 0.52 Discriminating 2.Accepted with very slight revision.
49 13 7 20 0.29 Difficult 0.17 Moderately Discriminating 4.May be accepted with minor revision.
50 28 15 43 0.63 Easy 0.38 Discriminating 3.Accepted with slight revision.

Summary of Results
1.Accepted as it is………………………….. 1 4.May be accepted with minor revision…… 20 7.Totally discard….. 0
page 2/2

8
2.Accepted with very slight revision……… 5.Major revision on the stem or choices…. 3
3.Accepted with slight revision……………. 15 6.Needs major revision or be discarded….. 3
Signature/Date:
FIRST QUARTERLY EXAMINATION / S.Y.
Item analysis in: READING AND WRITING SKILLS
2023-2024 MARIA CRISTINA M. FERNANDEZ

© Balajadia 2014
D O N O T P R I N T B E Y O N D T H I S PO I N T
Number Per Difficulty Number Per Discrimination
Very Difficult 0 Questionable 0
Moderately Difficult 14 Very Discriminating 2
Difficult 11 Moderately Discriminating 16
Easy 21 Discriminating 32
Very Easy 4 Not Discriminating 0
Total 50 Total 50
Department of Education - Region III
Division of Pampanga
MINALIN CLUSTER 6
STO. ROSARIO HIGH SCHOOL

ITEM ANALYSIS IN READING AND WRITING SKILLS

FIRST QUARTERLY EXAMINATION / S.Y. 2023-2024


Exam Title / School Year

Interpretation and Descriptive Analysis


Test Difficulty
Very Difficult - 0 ; Moderately Difficult - 14 ; Difficult - 11; Easy - 21; Very Easy - 4

There are fourteen items that fall into a moderately difficult category on the first quarterly examination that we administered. And 11 items that were rated as being difficult tough suggest that some students were
encouraged to think critically and analytically.and there are 21 items in the easy category, followed by 4 items in the simple category.

Test Discrimination
Questionable - 0; Very Discriminating - 2 ; Moderately Discriminating - 16 ; Discriminating - 32; Not Discriminating - 0

Based on the result of the exam there are 2 items fall into Very Discriminating and 16 questions under moderately discriminating, if properly reviewed it can be considered as good items and can be used to moderately
distinguish between learners' knowledge.The following 32 items showed a typical discriminating index. These can also be improved to increase their ability to make distinctions. And there are no items that are
questionable.

Final Impression

The strength of the exam questions in evaluating retention of the lesson depends on their level of difficulty and discriminating indicators.

Analyzed and reported by:

MARIA CRISTINA M. FERNANDEZ


Teacher
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
STO. ROSARIO HIGH SCHOOL
MINALIN, PAMPANGA

Grade Level 11
Subject Area: READING AND WRITING

MOST LEARNED
Item Skill/Competency Rank
28 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 1
17 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 2
25 Patterns of Development in writing 3
8 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 4
24 Patterns of Development in writing 5
6 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 6
4 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 7
23 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 8
21 Patterns of Development in writing 9
19 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 10

LEAST LEARNED
Item Skill/Competency Rank
17 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 1

8 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 2

4 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 3

28 Patterns of Development in writing 4


Evaluate research based on its properties in terms if
13 5
organization
16 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 6

19 Use of Strategies selecting and organizing information 7

25 Patterns of Development in writing 8

47 In a written text: Claim of fact, claim of Policy, Claim of Value 9

2 In a written text: Claim of fact, claim of Policy, Claim of Value 10

Prepared By:

MARIA CRISTINA M. FERNANDEZ


Teacher II

Checked By:

MA. CRISTELYN M. PANER


Master Teacher II

Noted By:

JAYSON M. FLORES
Principal III
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
STO. ROSARIO HIGH SCHOOL
MINALIN, PAMPANGA

Grade Level : Grade 11 Grading Period : First Quarter


Subject: READING AND WRITING Number of Respondents : 127

SUMMARY OF MEAN/MPS
1st Grading Period

Section i N HS LS Σrs Mean PL MPS


INTEGRITY 50 32 43 13 1,093 34.16 68.31 68.95

RIGHTEOUSNESS 50 31 43 12 1,080 34.84 69.68 70.28


KINDNESS 50 37 45 13 1,138 30.76 61.51 62.28
HONOR 50 26 38 13 789 30.35 60.69 61.48
TOTAL 126
AVERAGE 32.52 65.05 65.75

Prepared By:

MARIA CRISTINA M. FERNANDEZ s


Teacher II and Teacher III

Checked By: Noted By:

MA. CRISTELYN M. PANER JAYSON M. FLORES


Master Teacher II Principal III
21
13
29
27
23
20
25
19
24
21
26
27
15
13
24
15
26
23
24
18
22
20
14
38
19
20
566
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
STO. ROSARIO HIGH SCHOOL
MINALIN, PAMPANGA

Grade Level : Grade 11 Grading Period : First Quarter


Subject: General Mathematics Number of Respondents : 161

SUMMARY OF MEAN/MPS
1st Grading Period

Section i N HS LS Σrs Mean PL MPS


INTEGRITY 30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
OPTIMISM 30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
RIGHTEOUSNESS 30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KINDNESS 30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
HONOR 30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
TOTAL 0 0
AVERAGE #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Prepared By:

MA. CRISTELYN M. PANER


Master Teacher II

Checked By: Noted By:

MA. CRISTELYN M. PANER JAYSON M. FLORES


Master Teacher II Principal III

You might also like