EVOLUTION OF THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY (TC) MODALITY PROGRAMS

The evolution of therapeutic community (TC) modality programs for individuals deprived of liberty has
undergone significant changes over the years. Therapeutic communities in correctional settings aim to provide
a structured and supportive environment for rehabilitation and reintegration. Here is a general overview of the
evolution of TC programs for individuals in custody:

1. Origins (1940s-1950s)
The concept of therapeutic communities originated in the 1940s with the work of psychiatrists and
psychologists who aimed to create supportive environments for individuals with mental health issues.
In the 1950s, TCs started to be implemented in correctional settings, focusing on providing a
therapeutic and community-based approach to address criminal behavior.

2. Expansion and Development (1960s-1970s)

During the 1960s and 1970s, TC programs gained popularity as alternatives to traditional punitive
measures.
Programs started incorporating a range of therapeutic interventions, including group therapy,
vocational training, and education.
The emphasis was on creating a sense of community, responsibility, and mutual support among
participants.

3. Integration of Substance Abuse Treatment (1980s-1990s)

In the 1980s and 1990s, there was an increased recognition of the connection between substance
abuse and criminal behavior.
Many TC programs expanded to include specialized tracks for individuals with substance use
disorders, integrating addiction treatment into the overall therapeutic approach.

4. Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches (2000s-2010s):

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) principles became more prevalent in TC programs during the
2000s, focusing on addressing criminal thinking patterns and promoting pro-social behavior.
Rehabilitation efforts increasingly involved skill-building, cognitive restructuring, and relapse
prevention strategies.

5. Risk and Needs Assessment (2010s-2020s)

Modern TC programs often incorporate evidence-based risk and needs assessment tools to tailor
interventions to the specific needs of participants.
There is a growing emphasis on assessing criminogenic risk factors and addressing them through
targeted therapeutic interventions.

6. Technology Integration and Innovation

In recent years, technology has played a role in TC programs, facilitating remote counseling,
educational opportunities, and monitoring of participants post-release.
Innovations in virtual reality and online therapy may further impact the way therapeutic communities
operate in correctional settings.

7. Reentry and Community Transition

Contemporary TC programs increasingly focus on preparing individuals for reentry into society,
emphasizing community support networks, employment assistance, and ongoing treatment options.
Collaboration with community-based organizations and support systems becomes integral to the
success of reintegration efforts.

Throughout this evolution, the core principles of therapeutic communities, including mutual self-help,
peer support, and a focus on personal responsibility, have remained central to the approach. The evolving
landscape reflects a commitment to evidence-based practices and a holistic understanding of the factors
contributing to criminal behavior.

CA 322-P1
PERSON DEPRIVED OF LIBERTY
"PDL" stands for "Person Deprived of Liberty" in the Philippines, and it refers to individuals who are
detained or incarcerated. The term is often used in the context of the Philippine criminal justice system and
the management of individuals in custody. Here are key points regarding PDLs in the Philippines:

1. Legal Framework:
 The treatment and rights of PDLs are governed by Philippine laws, including the Revised
Penal Code, the Constitution of the Philippines, and various administrative issuances and
regulations.
2. Conditions of Detention:
 PDLs in the Philippines may be held in detention facilities such as city or municipal jails,
provincial jails, or national penitentiaries, depending on the severity of the offense and the
stage of the legal process.
 Overcrowding, inadequate facilities, and poor living conditions have been persistent
challenges in many Philippine jails and prisons.
3. Rights of PDLs:
 PDLs are entitled to fundamental rights guaranteed by the Philippine Constitution and
international human rights standards, including the right to humane treatment, due process,
access to legal representation, and medical care.
 Efforts are made to ensure that PDLs are treated with dignity and that their rights are
respected throughout the legal process.
4. Rehabilitation and Reintegration:
 The Philippine criminal justice system recognizes the importance of rehabilitation and
reintegration programs for PDLs.
 Various government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and civil society
groups are involved in providing rehabilitation and skills training programs to help PDLs
reintegrate into society upon release.
5. Legal Assistance and Support Services:
 PDLs have the right to legal assistance, and organizations such as the Public Attorney's
Office (PAO) provide legal aid and representation to indigent PDLs.
 NGOs and volunteer groups also offer support services such as counseling, education, and
livelihood programs to assist PDLs during and after their incarceration.
6. Challenges and Concerns:
 Challenges in the Philippine correctional system includes overcrowding, understaffing,
inadequate resources, and delays in the legal process.
 There are also concerns about the prevalence of corruption, violence, and human rights
abuses within some detention facilities.

Efforts are underway to address these challenges and improve the conditions and treatment of PDLs
in the Philippines. This includes reforms in the criminal justice system, the construction of new and improved
detention facilities, and the implementation of programs aimed at promoting rehabilitation and reintegration.

CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

CICL stands for "Children in Conflict with the Law," and it is a term used in the Philippines to refer to
individuals below 18 years old who are alleged to have committed offenses. The country recognizes the
unique needs and circumstances of children in the legal system and has established a separate justice
system for them to ensure their protection and rehabilitation.

Here are key points regarding CICL in the Philippines:

1. Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act:
 The Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act (JJWA) of 2006 is the primary legislation governing the
treatment of children in conflict with the law in the Philippines.
 The JJWA emphasizes a restorative justice approach, focusing on the rehabilitation and
reintegration of CICL into society.
2. Age of Criminal Responsibility:
 The JJWA sets the minimum age of criminal responsibility at 15 years old. Children below this
age are deemed to be exempt from criminal liability.
 Recent discussions and proposed bills have aimed to lower the age of criminal responsibility,
but this has been a topic of debate in the country.

CA 322-P2
 3. Diversion and Rehabilitation:
 The law encourages the use of diversion programs to keep CICL out of the formal court
system whenever appropriate.
 Diversion programs may include community-based interventions, counseling, and other
rehabilitative measures.
4. Establishment of Bahay Pag-asa:
 The law mandates the establishment of Bahay Pag-asa (Houses of Hope) as community-
based rehabilitation centers for CICL. These centers aim to provide a more nurturing
environment for rehabilitation.
5. Rights of CICL:
 The JJWA ensures that the rights of CICL are protected, including the right to be treated with
dignity, the right to legal representation, and the right to privacy.
 CICL have the right to rehabilitation and reintegration into their families and communities.
6. International Standards:
 The Philippines is a signatory to international conventions such as the United Nations
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which guides the development and
implementation of laws related to CICL.
7. Challenges and Concerns:
 Challenges in the implementation of the JJWA include issues related to the availability of
resources, the need for awareness and training among stakeholders, and debates about the
appropriate age of criminal responsibility.

Efforts are continually made to strengthen the juvenile justice system in the Philippines to align with
international standards and provide a more effective and rehabilitative approach for children in conflict with the
law. It's essential to monitor legislative developments and ongoing initiatives in the country to stay informed
about any changes in policies related to CICL.

CA 322-P3