6/9/17

Prioritization Matrix
Criteria Cost Quality Flexibility Delivery
Relative

Matrix Charts Importance

Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C

Prioritization Matrix Prioritization Matrix

Criteria Cost Quality Flexibility Delivery Criteria Cost Quality Flexibility Delivery
Relative .30 .40 .10 .20 Relative .30 .40 .10 .20
Importance Importance
Vendor A Vendor A 2 1 3 3
Vendor B Vendor B 1 2 2 1
Vendor C Vendor C 3 3 1 2

1
 6/9/17

Prioritization Matrix Prioritization Matrix

Criteria Cost Quality Flexibility Delivery Criteria Cost Quality Flexibility Delivery
Relative .30 .40 .10 .20 Relative .30 .40 .10 .20
Importance Importance
Vendor A 2 (.60) 1 3 3 Vendor A 2 (.60) 1 (.40) 3 (.30) 3 (.60) 1.90
Vendor B 1 (.30) 2 2 1 Vendor B 1 (.30) 2 (.80) 2 (.20) 1 (.20) 1.50
Vendor C 3 (.90) 3 1 2 Vendor C 3 (.90) 3 (1.20) 1 (.10) 2 (.40) 2.60

Prioritization Matrix Prioritization Matrix

Criteria Cost Speed Complexity Benefits
• Caution
Relative 30% 40% 10% 20%
– Feels Quantitative Importance
Improvement 1
• It is not
Improvement 2
– Value in discussions Improvement 3
• Team makes the decision

2
 6/9/17

Prioritization Matrix Prioritization Matrix

Criteria Cost Speed Complexity Benefits Criteria Cost Speed Complexity Benefits
Relative 30% 40% 10% 20% Relative 30% 40% 10% 20%
Importance Importance
Improvement 1 2 3 3 2 Improvement 1 2 (.60) 3 (1.20) 3 (.30) 2 (.40) 2.50
Improvement 2 3 1.5 2 3 Improvement 2 3 (.90) 1.5 (.60) 2 (.20) 3 (.60) 2.30
Improvement 3 1 1.5 1 1 Improvement 3 1 (.30) 1.5 (.60) 1 (.10) 1 (.20) 1.20