Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Employee Training and Development
Employee Training and Development
Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10E91fTrUsdHstQlFxL-cnzKwpVGUUyeM/view
Organizational Analysis
● The purpose of organizational analysis is to determine those organizational factors that either
facilitate or inhibit training effectiveness.
○ For example, an organization may view training as important but may not have the
money to fund its training program, may be unable to afford the employee time away
from work to be trained, or may not wish to spend money on training because employees
leave the organization after a short period of time.
● A properly conducted organizational analysis will focus on the goals the organization wants to
achieve, the extent to which training will help achieve those goals, the organization’s ability to
conduct training (e.g., finances, physical space, time), and the extent to which employees are
willing and able to be trained (e.g., ability, commitment, motivation, stress)
● An organizational analysis should include a survey of employee readiness for training.
○ For example, a large organization recently had several rounds of layoffs and had not
given its employees salary increases in three years.
○ When the organization introduced a new training program, it was surprised to find that
the employees were so angry at the company that they were “not in the mood for
training.”
○ Thus, training will be effective only if the organization is willing to provide a supportive
climate for training, it can afford an effective program, that employees want to learn, and
the goals of a program are consistent with those of the organization
Task Analysis
● If the results of the organizational analysis indicate that a positive organizational climate for training
exists, the next step is to conduct a task analysis.
○ The purpose of a task analysis is to use the job analysis methods discussed in Chapter 2 to
identify the tasks performed by each employee, the conditions under which these tasks are
performed, and the competencies (knowledge, skills, abilities) needed to perform the tasks
under the identified conditions.
● The most common job analysis methods used for this purpose include interviews, observations, and
task inventories. If an organization has detailed and current job descriptions already written, the task
analysis process is fairly easy and does not take much time.
● Once the tasks and competencies for a job have been identified, the next step is to determine how
employees learn to perform each task or obtain each competency.
○ For example, due to a rigorous employee selection process, we might expect employees to be
able to perform many of the tasks at the time they are hired. Some tasks might be so simple that
they can be performed without the need of previous experience or future training. For other
tasks, we might have formal training programs to teach employees the necessary competencies
needed to perform them.
Person Analysis
● The third and final step in the needs analysis process is determining which employees need training
and in which areas.
● Person analysis is based on the recognition that not every employee needs further training for every
task performed.
○ For example, trainers at Applebee’s restaurants test management trainees on essential
on-the-job tasks.
○ When the trainees demonstrate proficiency, the training ends.
○ Thus, some trainees complete the management training program in half the time it takes others.
● A person analysis should also include an evaluation of an employee’s readiness for the training.
● To determine the individual training needs for each employee, person analysis uses performance
appraisal scores, surveys, interviews, skill and knowledge tests, and/or critical incidents.
2. Surveys
● Another common approach to determine training needs is to design and administer a survey
that asks employees what knowledge and skills they believe should be included in future
training.
● Surveys offer several advantages.
○ First, they eliminate the problems of performance rating errors, which were discussed
previously.
○ Second, employees often know their own strengths and weaknesses best.
■ Thus, to determine what employees need, ask them.
○ Finally, training needs can be determined with surveys, even when the organization has
not previously made an effort to design an effective performance appraisal system or
adequate job descriptions.
● The main disadvantages of surveys are that employees may not be honest and the organization
may not be able to afford the training suggested by the employees.
● As with any type of survey, training needs surveys can be conducted in many ways.
○ The most common method is a questionnaire that asks employees to list the areas in
which they would like further or future training.
3. Interviews
● The third method of needs analysis is the interview, which is usually done with a selected
number of employees.
● Interviews are not used as extensively as surveys, but they can yield even more in-depth
answers to questions about training needs (Patton & Pratt, 2002).
● The main advantage of interviews is that employee feelings and attitudes are revealed more
clearly than with the survey approach.
● The main disadvantage of interviews is that interview data are often difficult to quantify and
analyze (Brown, 2002).
5. Critical Incidents
● The fifth method for determining training needs is the critical-incident technique.
● Although not a commonly used method, it is relatively easy to use, especially if a proper job
analysis is available.
● To use this technique for needs assessment, the critical incidents are sorted into dimensions
and separated into examples of good and poor performance.
● Dimensions with many examples of poor performance are considered to be areas in which
many employees are performing poorly and in which additional training is indicated.
❖ Goals should align with what the organization aims to achieve within the allocated time and resources.
➢ For instance, if limited time is available, goals should be realistic, such as identifying
common causes of conflict rather than mastering conflict mediation skills.
❖ Specificity is key in setting objectives, replacing vague goals with clear, measurable targets.
❖ Objectives should state what learners are expected to do, under what conditions, and to what standard.
➢ For example, objectives could include increasing customer contacts by a certain
percentage or completing tasks within a specific timeframe and with a specified level of
accuracy.
Each offers unique advantages depending on the organization's needs and resources.
The importance of these decisions lies in optimizing the effectiveness and efficiency of the training
program. By carefully selecting the delivery method and the individuals or resources involved in conducting the
training, organizations can ensure that employees receive high-quality instruction tailored to their needs. This,
in turn, enhances employee performance, job satisfaction, and overall organizational success. Additionally, by
aligning training initiatives with organizational objectives and employee skill requirements, businesses can
remain competitive in their respective industries and adapt to evolving market demands. Therefore, thoughtful
consideration of training delivery methods is paramount for fostering a skilled and motivated workforce capable
of meeting the challenges of today's dynamic business environment.
Off-site advantages: Off-site training locations, such as hotels, universities, or conference centers, can
provide a conducive environment for learning and may serve as incentives or rewards for employees,
fostering motivation and engagement.
Tailoring the training pace to accommodate varying ability levels ensures engagement and
effectiveness. Trainers typically maintain a moderate pace to balance the needs of diverse audiences.
Effective training relies on factors such as audience brightness, self-efficacy, motivation, and goal
orientation.
Effective preparation and presentation are key to successful classroom training sessions.
- Soft-skills training and technical training are very different types of training. I find it much more
challenging to present technical material over soft-skills material. Eight hours of statistics training can
be quite boring.
- It is very important to have a firm understanding of who is going to be in the training session.
- It is very important that you have a thorough understanding of the material prior to presenting
- Following the introduction of the trainer, most training programs start with some sort of icebreaker or
energizer.
- You will quickly lose the credibility of your participants if you provide answers that are not true.
- Never make up an answer on the spot just to answer the question. This will come back to haunt you!
- Use such things as PowerPoint, group activities, videos, group exercises, roundtable discussions, web
demos, and case studies. This not only will make your training program more interesting, but it will help
participants learn the materials.
- A poor pair of shoes will make for an extremely uncomfortable training experience.
Be prepared.
- Always check that you have all of your materials and information prior to walking out the door. I like to
use a checklist of all the things I need to take with me prior to the training.
- People like to be amused and entertained when they come to a training session. Effective use of humor
can be a great way to engage and entertain your audience. This will help break up the monotony of the
session.
Interest
Motivating employees to engage in training requires making the material interesting and providing
effective feedback. Interesting topics naturally captivate employees, but trainers can enhance engagement by
relating content to employees' lives, incorporating activities, employing various training techniques, injecting
humor, and encouraging audience participation.
Feedback
Is crucial for learning, providing specific information on task performance. While some tasks naturally
offer feedback, others require deliberate feedback mechanisms. Effective feedback helps employees
understand their performance, identify areas for improvement, and refine their skills. However, a balance must
be struck between giving too little and too much feedback to optimize learning outcomes.
➢ Positive feedback reinforces correct behavior
➢ Negative feedback, accompanied by specific suggestions for improvement, is essential for
correcting errors and enhancing performance.
Ensuring that training programs are both interesting and feedback-rich promotes employee motivation
and learning effectiveness.
- Employees will also be motivated to apply what they learned in training if the training program has a
reputation among them as being effective and useful (Switzer, Nagy, & Mullins, 2005). This is not
surprising given that employees talk with one another about training, and when they find a training
program useful (or not), they certainly pass that information on to other employees.
- The term overlearning does not have the same meaning in training that it has on most college
campuses. In training, overlearning means practicing a task even after it has been successfully learned.
Many students, however, think of overlearning as the negative consequence of “studying too hard.”
Although it is commonly believed that one can study too hard and “overlearn” the material, research
does not support the conclusion that this type of overlearning occurs or has negative consequences.
- An important factor in employee motivation to apply training is the atmosphere set by management.
That is, employees are most likely to apply their new knowledge and skills if supervisors encourage and
reward them to do so.
- The use of knowledge and skills learned in training can also be encouraged by having employees set
goals.
- Employees must have the skills and abilities to complete the training successfully.
- There should be minimal outside factors (e.g., work or family problems) that might distract the
employee and keep him from concentrating on the training program.
- Employees must be motivated to learn. That is, they must perceive that training is needed, that the
training program meets their expectations, that they have the ability to complete the training
(self-efficacy), and that there will be some reward for performing well.
- The training method (e.g., programmed instruction, behavioral modeling, lecture) must be a good match
for the employee’s learning style, ability, and personality.
- The training method must be a good match for the type of material being learned (e.g., knowledge vs. a
physical skill). The training program must allow for goal setting, positive feedback, distributed practice,
overlearning, and the chance to practice and apply the material learned (transfer of training). There
must be an opportunity and encouragement to use the newly acquired knowledge at work.
● Although this method is fairly simple, its findings are difficult to interpret because there is no
control group against which the results can be compared.
○ That is, suppose a significant difference in performance is seen between the pretest and
the posttest.
○ If a training program has occurred between the two tests, it would be tempting to credit
the training for the increase.
○ The increase, however, may have resulted from other factors, such as changes in
machinery, in motivation caused by non training factors, or in managerial style or
philosophy.
● Likewise, suppose no significant increase in performance is observed between pretest and
posttest.
○ The natural conclusion might be that the training program did not work. Without a control
group, that interpretation is not necessarily correct.
○ The same changes noted above for an increase may have caused a decrease in
performance in this second case.
○ Thus, it is possible that the training program actually did increase performance but that
other factors reduced it, which resulted in no net gain in performance from training.
● To overcome these problems, a control group should be used.
○ For training purposes, a control group consists of employees who will be tested and
treated in the same manner as the experimental group, except that they will not receive
training.
○ The control group will be subject to the same policy, machinery, and economic conditions
as the employees in the experimental group who receive training.
○ The diagram for a pretest/posttest control group design looks like this:
● Even though this design is an improvement on the first, it too has its drawbacks.
○ First, except for training manipulation, it is almost impossible to treat a control group the
same as the experimental group.
○ Control groups often consist of workers at other plants or on other shifts at the same
plant.
○ Such groups are used because there often is no alternative. But the fact that they are in
different environments reduces confidence in the research findings.
● With both of the above designs, the pretest itself presents a problem. That is, the mere taking of
a test may itself lead to increases in performance.
○ Because of this, a rather complicated method called the Solomon four-groups design
can be used (Campbell & Stanley, 1963).
○ Solomon Four-groups Design - an extensive method of evaluating the effectiveness of
training with the use of pretests, posttests, and control groups.
■ With this design, one group will undergo training but will not take the pretest, a
second group will undergo training but will take the pretest, a third group will not
undergo training but will take the pretest, and a fourth group will neither undergo
training nor take the pretest.
○ The diagram for this design is as follows:
○ This design allows a researcher not only to control for outside effects, but also to control
for any pretest effect.
■ This is the most scientifically rigorous of the research designs used to evaluate
training, but even this has a serious drawback: It is often not practical.
● That is, four groups of employees must be used, two of which do not
receive training.
2. Evaluation Criteria
● There are six levels at which training effectiveness can be measured: content validity, employee
reactions, employee learning, application of training, business impact, and return on investment
(Phillips & Stone, 2002).
● Content Validity - at times, the only way that training can be evaluated is by comparing training
content with the knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform a job.
○ In other words, the content validity of the training can be examined.
○ For example, if a job analysis indicates that knowledge of electronic circuitry is
necessary to perform a job, then a seminar that is designed to teach this knowledge
would have content validity.
○ Although content analysis may ensure that a training program is job related, it still does
not indicate whether a particular training method is effective.
● Employee Reactions - a method of evaluating training in which employees are asked their
opinions of a training program.
○ The most commonly used method to evaluate training is measuring employee reactions
to the training.
○ Employee reactions involve asking employees if they enjoyed the training and learned
from the training.
○ These ratings tend to be most influenced by the trainer’s style and the degree of
interaction in the training program, but are also influenced by the motivation of the
trainee prior to training as well as perceptions of organizational support for the training
○ Employee reactions are important because employees will not have confidence in the
training and will not be motivated to use it if they do not like the training process.
■ However, even though positive employee reactions are necessary for training to
be successful, positive employee reactions do not mean that training will lead to
changes in knowledge or performance
○ Because trainee reactions constitute the lowest level of training evaluation, they can
often be misleading.
■ For example, most seminars conducted by outside consultants are informative
and well presented, so employee reactions are almost always positive, even
though the training may not actually affect knowledge or future performance.
● Employee Learning - evaluating the effectiveness of a training program by measuring how
much employees learned from it.
○ Instead of using employee reactions as the criterion in evaluating training performance,
actual employee learning can usually be measured.
○ That is, if a training program is designed to increase employee knowledge of
communication techniques, then creating a test to determine whether an employee
actually learned is possible.
■ This test will be administered before training and then again after the training has
been completed.
■ The measurements that will be used for the pretest and posttest, as with
selection tests, must be both reliable and valid.
○ Thus, if the purpose of a training program is to increase job knowledge, an appropriate
job knowledge test must be constructed or purchased.
● Application of Training - measurement of the effectiveness of training by determining the
extent to which employees apply the material taught in a training program.
○ The extent to which employees actually can use the learned material.
○ Learning and memorizing new material is one thing, and applying it is another.
■ For example, if employees learn how to deal with angry customers, their ability to
apply this material can be measured by observing how they treat an angry
customer while they are actually working.
● Business Impact - a method of evaluating the effectiveness of training by determining whether
the goals of the training were met.
○ Business impact is determined by evaluating whether the goals for training were met.
■ For example, a restaurant such as Buffalo Wild Wings conducts a training
program designed to increase sales of top-shelf liquor.
■ A week after the training, if sales of liquors such as Knob Creek bourbon and
Absolut vodka increase, and sales of liquors such as Pepe Lopez tequila and
Aristocrat vodka decrease, the training would be considered successful because
it has had the desired business impact.
● Return on Investment - the amount of money an organization makes after subtracting the cost
of training or other interventions.
○ After accounting for the cost of the training, did the organization actually save money?
On the Job: Applied Case Study: Training at Pal’s Sudden Service (Sab)
● Pal's Sudden Service, headquartered in Kingsport, Tennessee, is a quick-service restaurant chain with
over 25 locations and is renowned for its excellence and quality, being the first to receive the Malcolm
Baldrige National Quality Award and winning the Tennessee Excellence Award multiple times.
● Pal's focuses on quick and accurate service, achieved through a unique training program
encompassing 120 hours of training for each hourly employee, including face-to-face and e-learning
sessions. Employees are versatile, capable of filling various roles.
● Store managers offer continual coaching, and employees undergo pop quizzes at shift beginnings, with
additional training for those scoring less than perfect.
● Through their comprehensive system, Pal's has drastically reduced errors from one in 450 transactions
to one in 3,360 and lowered service time from 23 to 18 seconds.
● Pal's attention to detail, like using Hoshizaki ice cubes to keep iced tea cool, underscores their
commitment to customer satisfaction.
● Pal exemplifies how focusing on training, assessment, and feedback can elevate service quality and
customer satisfaction, earning them recognition and loyal patrons.