Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review: A Guide to Systematic and Evidence-Based

Approaches

Welcome to our comprehensive guide on conducting systematic or evidence-based literature reviews.

Embarking on this journey can be daunting, as it requires meticulous attention to detail, critical
analysis, and a deep understanding of the research process. In this article, we'll delve into the
intricacies of literature review writing, offering valuable insights and practical tips to help you
navigate this challenging task.

Why is Writing a Literature Review Challenging?

Writing a literature review is a complex endeavor that demands more than just summarizing existing
research. It involves:

1. Identifying Relevant Sources: Sorting through vast amounts of literature to find sources
that are pertinent to your research topic.
2. Critical Analysis:Evaluating the quality, reliability, and validity of each source to determine
its relevance and contribution to your study.
3. Synthesizing Information: Integrating findings from multiple sources to construct a
coherent narrative that highlights key themes, trends, and gaps in the existing literature.
4. Maintaining Objectivity:Striking a balance between presenting the viewpoints of various
authors while maintaining your own academic integrity and perspective.
5. Adhering to Academic Standards: Following specific formatting and citation styles
prescribed by your institution or field of study.

Navigating these challenges requires time, patience, and expertise. However, with the right approach
and resources, you can streamline the process and produce a high-quality literature review that adds
value to your research.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the difficulties that students and researchers face when
tasked with writing literature reviews. That's why we offer professional assistance tailored to your
specific needs. Here's why you should consider ordering from us:

1. Expert Writers: Our team consists of experienced writers with advanced degrees in various
disciplines. They possess the expertise and research skills necessary to craft comprehensive
and insightful literature reviews.
2. Customized Solutions: We understand that every research project is unique. That's why we
offer personalized assistance tailored to your requirements and preferences.
3. Timely Delivery: We prioritize punctuality and strive to deliver high-quality work within
your specified deadline, ensuring that you have ample time to review and request revisions if
needed.
4. Original Content: Plagiarism is a serious academic offense. Rest assured, we uphold the
highest standards of integrity and produce original, plagiarism-free content that adheres to
academic guidelines.
5. Affordable Pricing: We believe that quality academic assistance should be accessible to all.
That's why we offer competitive pricing and various discounts to make our services
affordable for students on a budget.

Conclusion:

Conducting a systematic or evidence-based literature review is a challenging yet rewarding endeavor

that forms the foundation of scholarly research. By following the guidelines outlined in this article
and considering professional assistance from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can overcome obstacles and
produce a literature review that showcases your academic prowess and contributes to the
advancement of knowledge in your field.
This includes demographic information (for example, age, gender, ethnic origin) and information on
diagnosis, treatment, response to treatment, and follow-up after treatment. (OCEBM Table of
Evidence Glossary). Depending on the topic, you may want to supplement your search with a multi-
disciplinary database like Web of Science, or subject-specific databases, such as CINAHL, PsycInfo
or ERIC. Cornell University Library has created a decision tree that can help you determine what
kind of review might best suit your goals and constraints. Elly Dijk, Chris Baars, Arjan Hogenaar
and Marga van Meel KNAW Research Information Grey Literature 2007, Antwerp (Belgium), 10-11
December 2007. Outline. Introduction. Literature searching Key Sources Books Journal Articles and
Databases Grey Literature Theses. The search strategy should be documented in full for each
database, and can be published in an appendix to the published review article. The search terms
within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. Search filters are
sets of search terms chosen to restrict a search to a selection of references, such as articles based on
method or study type. Sometimes published reviews will include their search strategy in the
appendix. If you search without quotation marks, the terms are not kept together as a phrase. By
first doing a precis, students start to see what is important in the article, which will aid their later
write up (see more here ). CONSENT 2 years YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-
videos and registers anonymous statistical data. If you are interested in systematic reviews in
education specifically, this is a subject of development and debate the present time (e.g. Bennett
2005). You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. There are many different kinds of
reviews, and the kind that will suit you best will depend on a variety of factors, for instance, how
much time you have, as well as what kind of research question you’re working with. The research
may focus on different types of bacteria or blends of bacteria. However it is usually easy to skim
down the results titles quickly to pick out. You will use these to create search blocks that will then
form the basis for the search strings used in the different databases. Evidence based practice: Wat is
het?. Definition. Evidence based practice. When you test search, you simultaneously discover what
terminology is common in the field, and thus find more search terms. The information is only used to
contact the person using the form. Today’s Objectives. What is evidence based practice and practice
based evidence. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the search becomes more
precise; you will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain
variations on that phrase or a similar combination of search terms. The guidelines describe how
systematic reviews should be reported. Expand 41 Citations Add to Library Alert 3 Excerpts The
integrative review: updated methodology. R. Whittemore K. Knafl Medicine, Education Journal of
advanced nursing 2005 TLDR Data analysis methods of qualitative research are proposed as
strategies that enhance the rigour of combining diverse methodologies as well as empirical and
theoretical sources in an integrative review. Studies can be duplicated in more subtle ways, for
example an author might publish an abstract of data in a national journal, and then present the data at
international conference. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature,
based at the Allen Institute for AI. Can a search term be added that might include this key article.
At the library, we often get questions about what exactly characterizes a systematic review, what
differentiates it from other kinds of literature reviews, and how one might best go about searching
the literature systematically. Physiotherapy evidence Impact of research on clinical practice Barriers
to the uptake of evidence My journey into EBP.
This step can in my experience take far more time than you might realise. Screening for Depression:
Recommendations and Rationale. Bull World Health Organization, 78:439-445. Titler, M.G., Kleiber,
C., Steelman, V.J., et al. (2001). The Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care.
The cookie indicates an active session and is not used for tracking. Evidence based practice: Wat is
het?. Definition. Evidence based practice. These look a little different depending on which database
you’re using. Today’s Objectives. What is evidence based practice and practice based evidence. This
is something that needs to be paid careful attention to. Where can I find information to support my
clinical reasoning. In a full-scale systematic review a number of authors would do these steps
independently to ensure the process is accurate and to avoid bias introduced by personal choices and
preferences. The research may focus on different types of bacteria or blends of bacteria. Some
databases, for instance Web of Science, do not have a list of subject headings at all; to conduct a
search there, you have to use free-text terms. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
Why does a CID Research Proposal require a literature search and review. Output contains the
citations and references from the publications you’ve uploaded. Physiotherapy evidence Impact of
research on clinical practice Barriers to the uptake of evidence My journey into EBP. The beauty of
this within a project or piece of research is that you are generating legitimate research data that can be
displayed in a number of established figures and formats as illustrated below in Figure 5. Cohort
studies. As you move up the pyramid the amount of available literature decreases, but increases in
relevance to the. A variety of tools and databases allow you to search for citation data, including Web
of Science, Google Scholar and SpiderCite. If you search without quotation marks, the terms are not
kept together as a phrase. Amanda Hodgson, MLIS Sarah Normandin, BSc, MLIS CE Course May
26, 2008 CHLA 2008. In fact I believe that anyone conducting research should know these
principles. PRISMA 2020 consists of a checklist with 27 points and several flowcharts. Adding a
number after N will determine how many words you want to “allow” between your two terms. A
product from the ESRC methods programme. Version, 1. Performing systematic literature reviews
with novices: An iterative approach. Click on the number under the heading Citing Articles, you’ll
receive a list of these 73 publications. For example I might be interested whether probiotics help
people with diarrhoea. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the search becomes
more precise; you will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain
variations on that phrase or a similar combination of search terms. These of course can be further
limited perhaps by searching just for clinical trials.
The picture demonstrates how the different operators work. Careful reading and following of
citations will help us here: as will carefully noting context. The highest quality evidence (level 1
evidence) is the systematic review. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your
consent. Ovid is a database platform used for many different databases. There are many different
kinds of reviews, and the kind that will suit you best will depend on a variety of factors, for
instance, how much time you have, as well as what kind of research question you’re working with.
You may need to review the abstracts at this point to ensure they match your inclusion criteria. This
means all are done by the same systematic method to remove bias and. The relationship of an
attribute to the disease is examined by comparing the diseased and nondiseased with regard to how
frequently the attribute is present or, if quantitative, the levels of the attribute, in each of the groups.
(OCEBM Table of Evidence Glossary). By scanning titles, abstracts and subject headings, you may
find additional, useful search terms. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect
information to provide customized ads. This includes demographic information (for example, age,
gender, ethnic origin) and information on diagnosis, treatment, response to treatment, and follow-up
after treatment. (OCEBM Table of Evidence Glossary). McGill Library also has a helpful guide to
Rayyan. Library instruction and research consultations are available by Zoom web conference, in
person and by phone. The mainstay for any professional research must be the use of peer-reviewed
and edited articles, and Scholar will not provide a robust enough search of these, and will also
retrieve non-peer-reviewed reports and documents. By first doing a precis, students start to see what
is important in the article, which will aid their later write up (see more here ). If you are completing a
literature review, you may want just to provide an overall evaluation of everything that you have
found. How many times do we hear that people are just using a Google Search or even Scholar, and
they think it is research. Dr. Cochran, a British epidemiologist, identified a gap between current
practices and evidence-based guidelines. Ranji, MD Calvin Chou, MD, PhD SDRME Summer
Meeting 2012. Multi-disciplinary tutorials Evidence Pyramid EBP Glossaries Types of study designs
Video: Is it a research article. To reduce risk for bias, it is also recommended that at least two people,
independent of one another, review all found articles and choose which studies to include in the
review. If you do so, however, you risk missing material that may have been added retrospectively to
the database. Other tools can help you translate the search syntax used in different databases, for
example, Systematic Review Accelerator Polyglot. This guideline updates a previous version:
Jitramontree N. Evidence-Based Practice from a Nursing Perspective Cynthia Padula, PhD, RN
Nurse Researcher, The Miriam Hospital Master’s Program Director, Rhode Island College.
Objectives. Describe evidence based practice from a nursing perspective. For my review on MOOCs
I also used SCOPUS, IEEE and others. Systematic reviews of research in science education: rigour
or rigidity?, International Journal of Science Education, 27:4, 387-406. If you have a more in-depth
research need, please complete the consultation request form linked below. Select “ OR ” between
each row and add more rows if needed.
Expand 296 Citations PDF Add to Library Alert. 1 2 3 4. 83 References Filters Sort by Relevance
Sort by Most Influenced Papers Sort by Citation Count Sort by Recency 3 Excerpts Synthesizing
information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews G. This means all are done by the
same systematic method to remove bias and. Thank YOU!!!!. Some of these slides were created by
Sharon Reeve, Ph.D., BCBA Professor at Caldwell College Slides taken or adapted will be noted by
(Reeve). These look a little different depending on which database you’re using. The relationship of
an attribute to the disease is examined by comparing the diseased and nondiseased with regard to
how frequently the attribute is present or, if quantitative, the levels of the attribute, in each of the
groups. (OCEBM Table of Evidence Glossary). The search strategy should be documented in full for
each database, and can be published in an appendix to the published review article. Expand 167
Citations Add to Library Alert A Systematic Literature Review of The Importance of Sustainable
Business Strategy Kurniawan Kurniawan Y. Journal of Nursing Administration. 35, 35-40. Pignone,
M.P., Gaynes, B.N., Rushton, J.L., et al., (2002). Screening for depression in adults: a summary of
the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Researched based informationClinical
ExpertisePatient Preferences. You can also find out which search terms were used to index your key
articles. In systematic literature searching, a precision of two-three percent is common. That is, you
will look at your search results to see if they are retrieving relevant articles, and refine the keywords
and Boolean strategy if necessary to produce a more precise result. Sue Jenkins APA Conference
2013. Outline. EBP What it is, what it isn’t and why do we need it. No personally identifiable
information is stored in the cookie, and the user remains anonymous until they submit a form, at
which point the visitor ID is associated with the user's provided information. The information is only
used to contact the person using the form. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the
search becomes more precise; you will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss
articles that contain variations on that phrase or a similar combination of search terms. Implementing
EBP:The Iowa Model The Iowa Model of EBP was developed by Marita G. When these types of
evidence are ranked as levels, one on top of the other, the resulting image takes the form of a
pyramid, because the higher the quality of evidence, the rarer it is, and the lower the quality of
evidence, the more ubiquitous it is. For my review on MOOCs I also used SCOPUS, IEEE and
others. The different rows with search terms within each block are combined with OR, then the
blocks are combined with AND. There are several different frameworks available that might be able
to help you structure and delimit your research question. Cohort studies. As you move up the
pyramid the amount of available literature decreases, but increases in relevance to the. The search
terms within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. I generally
obtain the full paper for every article as I go along. YSC session YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is
used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages. Adding a number after adj will
determine how many words you want to “allow” between your two terms. The duplicate will need to
be removed as shown in Figure 5. For more in-depth undergraduate projects, and certainly for full
systematic reviews, the details on the right hand side would need to be fully understood and
reported. There is a nice explanation of the use of Boolean logic on Ithaca College Library website.
The mainstay for any professional research must be the use of peer-reviewed and edited articles, and
Scholar will not provide a robust enough search of these, and will also retrieve non-peer-reviewed
reports and documents.
It’s often a good idea to start with a test search where you use the subject headings and synonyms
you’re already familiar with. A Systematic Review is a review of a clearly formulated question that
uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant research.
Where will your education and career journey take you? Annals of Internal Medicine,136, 765-776
Simon, G.E. (2000). Long-term prognosis of depression in primary care. Iskandar Business,
Environmental Science WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
2021 This study undertakes a systematic review of the literature concerning the importance of a
sustainable business strategy for any business. If you are completing a literature review, you may
want just to provide an overall evaluation of everything that you have found. Once the question is
set, the search strategy evolves and we can start generating keywords around the question categories.
Category II-1: Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization. You will also
need to adapt field tags and other symbols. Journal of Nursing Administration. 35, 35-40. Pignone,
M.P., Gaynes, B.N., Rushton, J.L., et al., (2002). Screening for depression in adults: a summary of
the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. I generally obtain the full paper for every
article as I go along. PRISMA 2020 consists of a checklist with 27 points and several flowcharts. For
my review on MOOCs I also used SCOPUS, IEEE and others. Adding a number after adj will
determine how many words you want to “allow” between your two terms. Depending on the volume
of papers retrieved you may be able to look for sub-themes and organise your discussion around
these. Each individual research paper will then have been critically appraised for the. There are
several different options for searching in Embase (via embase.com). In the search example below, we
show how you can structure the search in a similar way as in Medline Ovid. The search should have
high sensitivity, that is, it should be created in such a way that the search will retrieve all relevant
articles within a research area, or at least discover as many as possible. Evidence-Based Practice
from a Nursing Perspective Cynthia Padula, PhD, RN Nurse Researcher, The Miriam Hospital
Master’s Program Director, Rhode Island College. Objectives. Describe evidence based practice
from a nursing perspective. Unfortunately, it is not possible to easily retrieve a list containing all the
references from several different publications. One way is to search directly in a given database’s
thesaurus. The search terms within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined
with AND. There are various methods to randomize study participants to their groups. (AHRQ
Glossary of Terms). This step can in my experience take far more time than you might realise.
However, Wichor Bramer and co-authors have also later published a modified and more advanced
version ( Bramer et al., 2016 ). The following checklist may be helpful during this review: Peer
Review of Electronic Search Strategies. A wide search means that not all search results will be
relevant. The highest quality evidence (level 1 evidence) is the systematic review. Semantic Scholar is
a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. You can
then combine the different blocks with AND.
Subject headings, however, will need to be adjusted to each database’s controlled vocabulary list. At
the library, we often get questions about what exactly characterizes a systematic review, what
differentiates it from other kinds of literature reviews, and how one might best go about searching
the literature systematically. There are many different kinds of reviews, and the kind that will suit
you best will depend on a variety of factors, for instance, how much time you have, as well as what
kind of research question you’re working with. Sue Jenkins APA Conference 2013. Outline. EBP
What it is, what it isn’t and why do we need it. Sessions can be in the library, classroom or virtual.
When you include the subject heading in your search you will find articles about a subject even if the
authors of the article have chosen other, adjacent words to describe the article themselves. In
systematic literature searching, a precision of two-three percent is common. For example, searching
for probiotics and diarrhoeal disease may reveal areas of research focusing on children as opposed to
adults for example. Implementing EBP:The Iowa Model The Iowa Model of EBP was developed by
Marita G. Reply Delete Replies Sam Young 17 May 2018 at 05:37 This comment has been removed
by the author. The URL may have been mistyped or the page may have moved. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 21, 335-344. Glass, G.V. (Ed.) (1976). Evaluation Studies Review Annual,
Vol. 1. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications. If you do so, however, you risk missing material that may
have been added retrospectively to the database. Performing systematic literature reviews with
novices: An iterative approach. For my review on MOOCs I also used SCOPUS, IEEE and others. A
Scientific Mapping and Methodological Assessment Mathew Azarian Hao Yu A. T. Shiferaw T. K.
Stevik Psychology Logistics 2023 Background: Systematic literature review (SLR) is increasingly
utilized to maximize the element of rigor and minimize the individual bias of research synthesis.
Expand 1,428 Citations Highly Influential PDF Add to Library Alert 4 Excerpts Guidance on the
conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. I have also run workshops introducing these
methods and they do seem to be overwhelmingly useful even to more experienced researchers.
Evidence-Based Practice from a Nursing Perspective Cynthia Padula, PhD, RN Nurse Researcher,
The Miriam Hospital Master’s Program Director, Rhode Island College. Objectives. Describe
evidence based practice from a nursing perspective. I generally obtain the full paper for every article
as I go along. Recognize the need for information Establish the purpose Formulate focused question
Identify target resources Perform the search Organize findings Appraise trustworthiness Assess
relevance Select action. Keep in mind that it may not always be possible to alter your strategy to
such an extent that all your key articles are found without your results becoming too comprehensive.
That is, you will look at your search results to see if they are retrieving relevant articles, and refine
the keywords and Boolean strategy if necessary to produce a more precise result. McGill Library
also has a helpful guide to Rayyan. If you search without quotation marks, the terms are not kept
together as a phrase. The search terms within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are
combined with AND. No personally identifiable information is stored in the cookie, and the user
remains anonymous until they submit a form, at which point the visitor ID is associated with the
user's provided information. For example, “What has already been written on subject X?”, then
narrowing down to the research question. Conduct a search in PROSPERO, for example, to ensure
that there are no ongoing projects that resemble yours. Where can I find information to support my
clinical reasoning.
Note that you would only rarely use all parts of the PICO-question in a search; most of the time, you
will focus on population and intervention. A systematic review is a critical assessment and
evaluation of all research studies that address a particular clinical issue. Barrett Johnson CWDA
Child Welfare Conference Monterey, CA May 29 th, 2008. References Collins, S., Vothe, T.,
DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G. (2005). Finding the evidence. Again, the Cochrane organisation has further
details on data extraction. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to
provide customized ads. You will use these to create search blocks that will then form the basis for
the search strings used in the different databases. It’s often a good idea to start with a test search
where you use the subject headings and synonyms you’re already familiar with. The method exists in
an unpublished and relative simple version presented here. This is following very simple principles
and those expert in searching and forming Boolean instruction will be more complex than this.
Expand 6,463 Citations Highly Influential PDF Add to Library Alert 2 Excerpts Scoping studies:
towards a methodological framework H. Arksey L. O’Malley Psychology, Medicine 2005 TLDR A
framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the
literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a
wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature
reviews. However, students could gain a reasonable idea from citations and journal rankings (albeit
rough). A wide search means that not all search results will be relevant. Journal of Nursing
Administration. 35, 35-40. Pignone, M.P., Gaynes, B.N., Rushton, J.L., et al., (2002). Screening for
depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
However it is usually easy to skim down the results titles quickly to pick out. Some databases, for
instance Web of Science, do not have a list of subject headings at all; to conduct a search there, you
have to use free-text terms. Where can I find information to support my clinical reasoning. Studies
can be duplicated in more subtle ways, for example an author might publish an abstract of data in a
national journal, and then present the data at international conference. That is, you will look at your
search results to see if they are retrieving relevant articles, and refine the keywords and Boolean
strategy if necessary to produce a more precise result. These cookies will be stored in your browser
only with your consent. Expand 1,428 Citations Highly Influential PDF Add to Library Alert 4
Excerpts Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews
of research in science education: rigour or rigidity?, International Journal of Science Education, 27:4,
387-406. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses Lifelines. 10, 244-249 US
Preventive Services Task Force (May, 2002). You can also find out which search terms were used to
index your key articles. You might be researching an area of biomedical science and wish only to
include animal investigations. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21, 335-344. Glass, G.V. (Ed.) (1976).
Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications. By first doing a precis,
students start to see what is important in the article, which will aid their later write up (see more here
). Expand 167 Citations Add to Library Alert A Systematic Literature Review of The Importance of
Sustainable Business Strategy Kurniawan Kurniawan Y. The database search can also be
supplemented with other search strategies, for instance handsearching in selected journals, reviewing
reference lists or undertaking a citation analysis. No personally identifiable information is stored in
the cookie, and the user remains anonymous until they submit a form.