Systematic Literature Review Guidelines

Writing a literature review is an integral part of any academic or research project, especially for those
undertaking systematic literature reviews. This process involves thoroughly examining existing
scholarly works relevant to a specific topic, synthesizing their findings, and critically analyzing the
gaps and contributions to the field. However, for many individuals, crafting a comprehensive
literature review can be an overwhelming and time-consuming task.

The complexity of conducting a literature review lies in the extensive research required to ensure that
all relevant sources are identified and analyzed. Moreover, synthesizing information from various
studies while maintaining objectivity and coherence can be challenging. Additionally, adhering to the
rigorous guidelines and standards of academic writing adds another layer of difficulty to the process.

Given the complexities associated with writing a literature review, it's no surprise that many
individuals seek assistance to streamline the process and ensure the quality of their work. At ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges faced by researchers and students when it comes to
literature review writing. That's why we offer expert assistance tailored to your specific needs.

Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting high-quality literature reviews that adhere to
systematic review guidelines. Whether you need assistance with identifying relevant sources,
synthesizing information, or structuring your review, our experts are here to help.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and alleviate the
stress associated with this daunting task. Our dedicated team will work closely with you to ensure
that your literature review meets the highest standards of quality and academic integrity.

Don't let the complexities of literature review writing hinder your research progress. Order your
literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and experience the difference our expert assistance
can make.
SpiderCite builds on citation data from Lens.org. To use SpiderCite you need to save the
publications you want to use as your starting point in an XML, RIS or BibText-file. Be sure to meet
with a reference librarian if you are unsure how to create an effective search strategy. Writing an
embedded literature review will clarify your understanding of the material and demonstrate your
thorough research skills. Think about why this is important for your research. Also note when your
sources were published and if any important social, political, or economic events occurred at roughly
the same time. Keep in mind that it may not always be possible to alter your strategy to such an
extent that all your key articles are found without your results becoming too comprehensive. Find
additional examples of useful tools at Systematic Review Toolbox. This will give you more control
over the search and will also make your search strategy more transparent. Example: If reviewing the
development of technology in the last decade, you might organize your sections based on each year
or significant milestones. The unfiltered search results should be saved and retained for possible
reanalysis. For example, scholars who published in the 1960s interpreted a historical event differently
than those who published in the early 2000s. As such, the thesis or central argument of your
historiography should explain why your research on the topic contributes to or rejects previous
historical analyses of your topic. Try to place your current work and research within this wider
discussion by considering how your research supports, contradicts, or departs from other scholars’
research. Now equipped with the essential steps to start your literature review, you're set on the right
path. OR Agile, scrum, extreme programming, lean, crystal clear, feature driven development,
dynamic software development. The information is only used to contact the person using the form. A
logging system is needed to make sure all relevant studies. Address how your approach to the topic
reinforces or rejects previous approaches as well as how your work contributes to the larger body of
knowledge on your topic. She is majorly involved in developing and reviewing online content plans
that engage and resonate with audiences. Systematic review article and Meta-analysis: Main steps for
Successful writin. They are often collaborative and tag, for instance, inclusion- and exclusion criteria.
Select fields for each comparison below and click on Find Duplicates under References and remove
all duplicates. The kinds of questions you'll come up with are: Were the participants really randomly
allocated to their groups. Established stewardship committee, and implementation in MCH, Makkah,
Saudi Arabia. It is assumed that by mentioning a previous work in the field of study, that the author
has read, evaluated, and assimilated that work into the work at hand. Demonstrate how each piece of
research contributes to the overall understanding of your chosen topic. In this guide, we will cover:
the definition of a systematic literature review the purpose of a systematic literature review the
different types of systematic reviews how to write a systematic literature review. A systematic
review, on the other hand, is more than just a summary. They’re the most common type of
systematic literature review. Plan your research protocol Now you need a detailed strategy for how
you’re going to search for and evaluate the studies relating to your question.
Watson, 2002), they are less common in software engineer-. You'll find links to systematic review
databases, and guidance to critically appraising systematic reviews. To write a strong embedded
literature review, you should approach your research systematically. You can use these key articles to
both construct your own search strategy and to test it: if your search does not retrieve your key
articles, then your strategy needs to be modified. Here’s a free detailed template for recording data
extraction, from Dalhousie University. The protocol for your systematic literature review should
include: the objectives of your project the specific methods and processes that you’ll use the
eligibility criteria of the individual studies how you plan to extract data from individual studies
which analyses you’re going to carry out For a full guide on how to systematically develop your
protocol, take a look at the PRISMA checklist. If you use truncation, the automatic mapping won’t
work. The structure will help you to clearly express your ideas and demonstrate how your sources
are connected. You may want to add these new headings to your Matrix to remind you to critically
appraise the sources according to this new criteria. What’s the wider goal for the work you’ll be
doing? 3. The unfiltered search results should be saved and retained for possible reanalysis. McGill
Library also has a helpful guide to Rayyan. Ensure that your ideas flow logically, and use clear
language to communicate complex concepts. What types of systematic literature reviews are there.
SLRs are a research method used to write an entire journal article. Step 4: Create An Outline In this
crucial step, determine the organizational structure of your review, which will serve as the
foundation for your written work. Your systematic literature review doesn’t have to contain a
comparison, but you’ll want to stipulate at this stage, either way. That is, that you review the
citations and references for the included publications. There are also international guidelines that
detail how systematic reviews should be reported, the Prisma Guidelines. Codes related to the
parallel interwoven creation tracks principle. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books,
and other scholarly sources relevant to a particular area of research. Moreover, consultant on
personal, professional, stewardship leadership, research. They are often collaborative and tag, for
instance, inclusion- and exclusion criteria. Engage in Dialogue Frame your literature review as a
conversation with other scholars. Visit our guide to the best research databases for medicine and
health to find resources for your systematic review. In-text citations are key to a good literature
review. PRISMA 2020 consists of a checklist with 27 points and several flowcharts. Promotes
Theory Development: Evaluates and combines existing theories, possibly leading to new ones. For
each source, consider the following: What's the Author Trying to Do. Using Smartwatches to Assist
Students with Intellectual and Developmental Dis.
Interpret and present the results. 1. Decide on your team When carrying out a systematic literature
review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. Also
look for publication patterns by investigating if certain approaches to the topic were common during
a specific time. What is the difference between a literature review and a systematic review. News
Production Workflows in Data- driven, Algorithmic Journalism: A Systema. A classic systematic
literature review can take different approaches: Effectiveness reviews assess the extent to which a
medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. Click on the number under the heading
Citing Articles, you’ll receive a list of these 73 publications. OR Agile, scrum, extreme
programming, lean, crystal clear, feature driven development, dynamic software development. Be
sure that you start with your General Field first before referring to your dissertation study. Their
objective is to synthesize evidence through meta-analysis, a type of SLR that employs statistical
analyses. Synthesize Information Connect the dots between different studies. Codes related to the
iterative and incremental design and development principle. Prognostic reviews examine the course
of a disease and its potential outcomes. Systematic review article and Meta-analysis: Main steps for
Successful writin. Make an assessment checklist that closely aligns with your research protocol,
including a consistent scoring system, calculations of the quality of each study, and sensitivity
analysis. Besides making room for suf?cient up-front design activities as. This is where your librarian
will come in handy again. A safer way is to delimit your search to the dates when articles were last
added to the database, or use EndNote to deduplicate your new references. Using Smartwatches to
Assist Students with Intellectual and Developmental Dis. A literature review creates a “landscape”
for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the field. A logging
system is needed to make sure all relevant studies. You should document details such as: The
databases you search and which years they cover The dates you first run the searches, and when
they’re updated Which strategies you use, including search terms The numbers of results obtained.
The first stage in carrying out a systematic literature review is to put together your team. What
evidence has led to a particular claim being made. Specify the time frame, key themes, and relevant
studies to focus your research. They are self-contained pieces of writing that can function as a
stepping stone to a larger piece of writing or can enhance writers’ understandings of a topic. Reasons
for each of your comments should be mentioned, and readers should be made aware of what they
ought to expect from the literature content. It allows for a comprehensive exploration of various
aspects without being bound by a strict timeline. Also note when your sources were published and if
any important social, political, or economic events occurred at roughly the same time. Like other
literature reviews, historiographies can be embedded or stand-alone. The places to consider in your
search are electronic scientific databases (the most popular are PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase ),
controlled clinical trial registers, non-English literature, raw data from published trials, references
listed in primary sources, and unpublished sources known to experts in the field. ?? Take a look at
our list of the top academic research databases.
Thematic Organization Group related studies by themes rather than chronology. They are highly
customizable, and you can use them in any way you desire. World-Wide Web OR project OR
development) AND (method OR process OR. Communications of the Association of Information
Systems, 37 (43), 879-910. They are often collaborative and tag, for instance, inclusion- and
exclusion criteria. Use specific authors or sources as examples, and be sure to explain any similarities
or departures in approach, methodology, findings, or argument. The database search can also be
supplemented with other search strategies, for instance handsearching in selected journals, reviewing
reference lists or undertaking a citation analysis. Once reference lists have been finalised the full
articles of potentially useful studies. If you search without quotation marks, the terms are not kept
together as a phrase. Clarity and Conciseness Write with clarity and conciseness. For instance, you
can search for the articles using titles, but you can also do so using PMID-nr or DOI-nr. This will
give you more control over the search and will also make your search strategy more transparent. In-
text citations are key to a good literature review. For example qualitative studies can suggest reasons.
The protocol can be registered, in PROSPERO for example, or in another open repository, such as
Open Science Framework or Figshare. Simply indicating what an author claims or has found is not
sufficient. OR cross organisation OR cross organization OR cross organizational OR. The more
search blocks you have, the narrower your search will be; the narrower your search, the greater your
risk of excluding relevant articles. You may start by defining inclusion parameters (e.g., qualitative
vs. quantitative studies, date published, location of study, etc.). You should also record keywords to
search for your topic and build search strings that will help you find sources (e.g., exercise AND
mental health AND adolescents). Again, record any excluded studies here for reference. 9. Interpret
and present the results Consider different factors when interpreting your results. Definition A
systematic literature review is a summary, analysis, and evaluation of all the existing research on a
well-formulated and specific question. Does it agree with what we already know, add new info, or
challenge what we thought. It should not merely be descriptive—it should present definitions,
theories, debates, and research data in the field of interest. You must have a clear understanding of
the important people, series of events, places, or times that were involved with your topic. They’re
often used to complement, or in the absence of, quantitative data. In both stand-alone and embedded
historiographies, you must support your arguments and analyses with examples from the sources.
Rather than examining the topic itself, historiography is the study of how historical topics have been
examined over time by other historians. Medical professionals read systematic literature reviews to
stay up-to-date in their field and granting agencies sometimes need them to make sure there’s
justification for further research in an area. ?? What is the first stage of a systematic literature review.
Now, let's explore some examples of literature reviews that can assist you in crafting your own.
Psychometric reviews assess the quality of health measurement tools so that the best instrument can
be selected for use.