The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns

A and B in two years, 1960 and 2010.

The pie charts compare the proportion of the working population in manufacturing, sales and
services in 1960 and 2010 in two towns.
Overall, the percentage of the workforce in manufacturing increased in both towns in 2010
compared with the 1960 figures. By contrast, in Towns A and B, the proportion of those
working in the sales sector fell in 2010.
Regarding the producing,In 1960 the figure for workers in manufacturing was 29% in Town A,
almost three times higher than the figure in Town B. However, by 2010 the proportion of
people in manufacturing had risen in Towns A and B to 64% and 25%, respectively.
In term of two remaining field, the figures for the sales sector witnessed a decline. In Town A,
the proportion of the workforce in sales in 1960 was 41% and this fell by over half to 20% in
2010 while the figure for Town B decreased from 70% in 1960 to 53% in 2010. Futhermore the
percentage of workers in the services sector almost halved in Town A to 16% in 2010, whereas
in Town B it rose slightly from 20% in 1960 to 22% in 2010.

Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports,

while others think people should have the freedom to do any sports or
activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people argued that authorities must restrict people’s access to dangerous sports,while
others believed that they should play any of those activities with freedom.In my opinion,
although extreme sports may have many potential risks,I would argue that people should play
any sports they want based on their interests.
On the one hand,It is resonable that the goverment should outlaw dangerous sports because
participants may suffer serious injuries.There is no doubt that they could affect live of players
and cost a lot of money to rescue even when used all the essential sports gear required or the
insurance companies have guaranteed the safety of activities.For instance, Paragliding and cliff-
jumping obviously endanger involver in which life-threatening injuries are sustained all too
often by those who take part,then in the most fortunate situation, victims are eventually out of
cash because of medical expenses and have to deal with their own psychological trauma.
On the other hand,participants have the right to join in sports which help them not only forget
busy work and also play an vital role in their spiritual life.Thus,Instead of being banned the
dangerous sports, people may involve in those activities in the peak of condition to get a low
probality of injury.For example, those who attempt to try extreme sports like deep ocean diving
or bungee jumping must be required to register with a club,and that beginners must be
accompanied by an expert then be taught about what to do when a accident occurs.As a
result,within taking these sensible precausions,it would be relatively safe for participants to
play sports with a high degree of risk.
In conclusion,While limiting people’s approach to dangerous activities on safety grounds should
be prioritized, It seems to me that they may be interested in those kinds of sports freely by
enhancing awareness in the way how to prevent hurt and deal with it.