Conducting A Literature Review For A Research Project

Embarking on a research project is a journey filled with challenges, and one of the most daunting
tasks along the way is the literature review. This critical component of any research endeavor requires
thoroughness, attention to detail, and an ability to synthesize vast amounts of information. Yet, for
many, the process can be overwhelming.

The difficulty in writing a literature review lies in navigating the extensive array of existing research,
theories, and opinions relevant to your topic. It requires sifting through numerous academic journals,
books, and other sources to identify the most pertinent and credible information. Additionally,
synthesizing this information in a coherent manner while also offering critical analysis can be a
complex and time-consuming endeavor.

Furthermore, the pressure to ensure that your literature review is comprehensive, well-organized, and
contributes meaningfully to the research can add to the challenge. Many researchers find themselves
grappling with writer's block or uncertainty about where to begin or how to structure their review
effectively.

In light of these challenges, it's no wonder that many individuals seek assistance with their literature
reviews. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution to this dilemma. Our team of experienced writers
specializes in crafting literature reviews that meet the highest academic standards. With their
expertise and dedication, they can help you navigate the complexities of the literature review
process, saving you time and ensuring that your research project is founded on a solid scholarly
foundation.

By choosing ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that your literature review will be
meticulously researched, expertly written, and tailored to your specific needs and objectives. Don't
let the daunting task of writing a literature review hinder your research progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide the support and assistance you need to succeed.
Each approach has to demonstrate its consistency to its foundations and will reflect them in data
collection, analysis, and knowledge claim. Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific things
about your chosen sources. To be clear, such reviewer and editor opposition to research items from
other fields has been the exception in the numerous review processes of literature reviews in which I
have participated. This is a costly mistake, as it always results in extensive rewriting, which takes a
lot longer than just doing it one step at a time. This figure does not intend to provide a step-by-step
guide of how to perform a literature review of qualitative accounting research. Compared with
quantitative research papers, which usually compress accounting and related phenomena into
variables that can be included in statistical analyses ( Messner et al., 2017 ), the findings sections of
qualitative accounting studies are often more extensive. Aimed at undergraduate students in research
methods courses or others with a lab or research project, each book describes a key stage in the
research process. In our view, such an evidence-based approach was warranted because we sought to
integrate largely disjointed research findings that were originally based on very different theoretical
assumptions. These webinars are free to access and will be delivered by contemporary politics
experts —drawn from Sage’s team of authors and editors— who range from practitioners to
instructors. Note: although you may collect a large number of quotes during the note taking phase of
your review, when you write the review, use quotes very sparingly. Put differently, the choice of the
use case and central topic of the literature review shapes the remainder of the review process ( Booth
et al., 2021; Hiebl, 2021; Simsek et al., 2021; Tranfield et al., 2003 ). This process is detailed next. 3.
Process and systematicity of literature reviews identify a review topic; search for and select the
relevant literature; analyze the relevant literature; and report the review findings. Selected approach
determines the research design to be followed. Bestselling author Arlene Fink shows readers how to
explain the need for and significance of research, as well as how to explain a study’s findings. All
these reviews have focused on a certain substantive topic within accounting research or, in the words
of Lukka and Vinnari (2014), a certain domain of accounting research. Of course, just because a
piece of content takes the form of a blog post doesn’t automatically mean it is low-quality. In fact,
Petticrew and Roberts (2012) argue that a literature review should be conducted at the start of any
research project, particularly PhD theses, to avoid overlooking research relevant to the project at
hand. Print Friendly Literature Reviews Getting started What is a literature review. So how do
researchers go about finding out what these are. A further challenge for literature reviews of the
qualitative accounting literature lies in the identification of relevant research items. Given the
different ways, a qualitative piece of accounting research can be read or (re)interpreted (see above),
a truly comprehensive review sample may be unattainable, as whether a research item is related to the
review’s research question lies in the literal eye of the beholder. The recent review paper by
Repenning et al. (2022) illustrates this sort of contribution. Apart from such discretion, the most
important meta-criterion is a good fit between the literature review’s research question and inclusion
criteria. Digitalization of finance has made it possible for small business to run equity crowdfunding
campaigns, but also to initiate a TTW process online and quite easily. Adobe Express Go from Adobe
Express creation to Issuu publication. A strand of the literature may be viewed as inadequate in that
certain perspectives, frameworks or theories have been insufficiently incorporated or used in a field.
But excellent research questions are not easy to write at all. Possible solution: Analyze your state,
decide whether you are too excited or not enough. Formulating a Research Problem. 1. Literature
Review. Functions of literature review in research. By contrast, as illustrated by Hoon and Baluch
(2020), the second route for creating a contribution from a literature review lies in the identification
of similar theoretical thinking within a domain, even if the important parts of that strand of the
literature would not have identified or exploited such similarities before. By writing a literature
review, a researcher recognizes strengths that they want to replicate in their own studies and
identifies limitations that need to be addressed and overcome. The main concern of novice
researchers is to find the reason and appropriate design to do the research and the proper
methodology to answer the question.
Video Say more by seamlessly including video within your publication. Fullscreen Sharing Deliver a
distraction-free reading experience with a simple link. The various findings and arguments from each
piece of literature form the individual puzzle pieces, and you then put these together to develop a
picture of the current state of knowledge. I tried to point out that the comprehensiveness of review
samples in reviews of qualitative accounting research cannot be definitively judged in most cases;
rather, such reviews may benefit from an openness toward relevant research conducted and published
in other research disciplines. Their insights and constructive comments are reflected in this paper, but
given the blind review process, the author can only name a few of them here. It does not provide
researchers with a set of rules to be followed or give them a comforting sense of security and safety
backup against possible mistakes on the road to knowledge. A qualitative researcher will have the
chance of discovering the “significant truths” in the lives of people. The expansion of knowledge;
The discovery of truth; and To make prediction. A good research requires a good research question as
well because it allows us to identify what we really want to know. The purpose of this paper is to
review the literature and develop an understanding of the complexities and challenges faced by
students and new researchers in preparing journal papers. 7 Research Challenges (And how to
overcome them) Fortunately, many of the research challenges you will face—from choosing a topic,
to finding study participants, to staying sane throughout the process, and every step in
between—have already been addressed by members of the Walden community. Probably the most
challenging issue I have encountered when crafting literature reviews that heavily lean on qualitative
accounting research has been the question of a literature review’s contribution. To discuss the
challenges of conducting unstructured interviews with depressive patients:. (2012) in a study about
the challenges faced by qualitative researchers in the analysis of their projects. According to Foss
(2017): the review of literature is structured to familiarize the readers to find the keys from various
studies. My above example ( Ndemewah and Hiebl, 2022 ) probably falls into the anomalies camp,
as large parts of the literature we covered shared epistemological positions that clearly differed from
what is usually considered to be mainstream accounting research (i.e. quantitative research primarily
based on archival data and carrying a positivist worldview), rendering most research in the domain
we covered as featuring abnormal epistemological positions compared with mainstream accounting
research. Section 5 concludes with implications for future reviews of qualitative accounting research.
Thus, junior scholars sometimes focus more on the technicalities of reviews and less on what we can
learn from the analysis of the review sample. Another insight might be to identify some irregularity
in the specifics of the review sample (cf. Materials and Methods: This article describes the practical
challenges of using qualitative inquiry in the field of health and the challenges of performing an
interpretive research based on professional experience as a qualitative researcher and on available
literature. With a full understanding about the purpose of a literature review, people are better able to
accomplish them,” says Callie M. Another potential benefit of this theory-led approach is that an
alternative theory may be suggested, and the current state of the field may be portrayed as
inadequate or even incommensurate, as detailed in Section 2. While the number of published
literature reviews in accounting journals has increased in recent years, and entire review-centric
special issues have been or are about to be published in these journals (e.g. in the European
Accounting Review and Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation ), specific
advice on crafting reviews of accounting research remains scarce. However, this paper is based on
personal experience that usually does not end up being published in academic journals rather than
being built on a systematic review of prior reviews. Put in Keating’s (1995) theory development
categories, qualitative accounting researchers seem to prefer theory refinement and, potentially to a
lesser degree, theory testing reviews of the literature but are rarely open to theory discovery reviews.
However, a strong literature review should also incorporate the current literature. Subsequent
arrangements would be on the proper methods of data collection, and choosing the participants and
the research setting according to the methodology and the research question. Thus, a qualitative
research question can be broadly, rather than narrowly, focused in the beginning. Manager,
Management Control Systems McDonnell Douglas Automation Company. This is a costly mistake,
as it always results in extensive rewriting, which takes a lot longer than just doing it one step at a
time. Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective Every step in the
systematic review process has challenges, ranging from resistance by review teams to adherence to
standard methodology to low-energy commitment to full participation. This literature review focuses
on reports of past research on the impact of technology within the health sector with an aim of
analyzing how technology has affected the quality of care, the management of health record
management processes and the direction of health care in general.
Sometimes there is an inconsistency between research question, research methodology, and basic
philosophical assumptions, and the researchers fail to justify their methods of choice in line with the
research question and the ontological and epidemiological assumptions. If the researcher is confused
in literature work, the literature writing service will help in the perfect time. It describes the activities
that meet specific objectives to introduce a specified task or improve new or existing products and
services. Types of reviews 1. Define your research question 2. These webinars are free to access and
will be delivered by contemporary politics experts —drawn from Sage’s team of authors and
editors— who range from practitioners to instructors. But now you can take this task to the best
academic writers. Best Dissertation Literature Review Help Dissertation Help Literature Review
Dissertation Literature Review Dissertation Literature Review Writing Service literature review help
in UK literature review in UK Literature Review Writing Help Literature Review writing services
PhD Dissertation Literature Review Help PhD Thesis Literature Review Help write a PhD literature
review. It is the endless possibilities to learn more about people that qualitative researchers resonate
to. Thus, special thanks go to Jean Bartunek, Laura Cardinal, David Denyer, Hans Englund, Ralf
Ewert, Jonas Gerdin, Lukas Goretzki, Thomas Gunther, Zahirul Hoque, Steven Kachelmeier, Sven
Kunisch, Bill Lee, Markus Menz, Utz Schaffer, Roland Spekle and Michael Williamson for smooth
editing and sharing insights on crafting literature reviews with the author. As such, it is a useful way
of arguing for new research to be done - for example, as part of a proposal for. When reading a book
or an extended article you might notice that it is increasingly hard for you to concentrate. To be clear,
such reviewer and editor opposition to research items from other fields has been the exception in the
numerous review processes of literature reviews in which I have participated. Unlike the first two
use cases, use case (iii) reviews are rarely informed by a specific theory and are naturally bound to
the specific method adopted by the research items in the review sample. The degree of novelty will
determine what is to be published and what is to be cited. Student A: Smith 2000 concludes that
personal privacy in their living quarters is the most important factor in nursing home residents'
perception of their autonomy. The reason for the absence of landmark literature in poor literature
reviews is most commonly that either the student isn’t aware of the literature (because they haven’t
sufficiently immersed themselves in the existing research), or that they feel that they should only
present the most up to date studies. Conclusions: The paper provides personal comments on the
experiences of a researcher in conducting pure qualitative research in the field of health. In fact, they
choose qualitative research for some significant reasons: The emotions, perceptions, and actions of
people who suffer from a medical condition can be understood by qualitative research The meanings
of health professions will only be uncovered through observing the interactions of professionals with
clients and interviewing about their experience. Explore how the sources challenge and contradict
each other and where they agree or expand upon each other. In many cases, an abstract’s goal is to
engage readers and help researchers and cataloguers determine whether your work is a relevant
source for their work and whether it’s a good fit for a specific collection or academic journal. They
also present one repository currently being built for readings by underrepresented authors that are
Black, Indigenous or people of color. Citation (referencing) patterns What is a literature review.
Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them Traditional approaches to reviewing
literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect decisions. A related opportunity for
qualitatively oriented accounting scholars may lie in the richness and depth of the explanations
provided in many published research articles. Structuring a literature review Directing the argument
and synthesising sources Being critical in your literature review. Adobe Express Go from Adobe
Express creation to Issuu publication. As you conduct your research, take note of the themes present
in them and ask questions. The lessons in this book can be applied to writing the background section
for a thesis or an original research publication. In my paper, most of the research items rested on other
strands of institutional theory, and thus, shared similarities in terms of terminology and focal
phenomena with the theoretical paradigm on which I focused (i.e. embedded agency). Still, even
when the originally adopted theories and “new” theory adopted for reexamining the selected research
items are sufficiently close, this strategy still comes with the risk of misinterpreting earlier research
findings. By contrast, as illustrated by Hoon and Baluch (2020), the second route for creating a
contribution from a literature review lies in the identification of similar theoretical thinking within a
domain, even if the important parts of that strand of the literature would not have identified or
exploited such similarities before.
It describes the activities that meet specific objectives to introduce a specified task or improve new
or existing products and services. Only by working together can we build and maintain a strong
system of rigorous, evidence-informed decision-making in conservation and environmental
management. Lack of knowledge, experience, and skills to do qualitative research can hinder the
formation of original knowledge and improvement in understanding the phenomenon under study.
Unlike the first two use cases, use case (iii) reviews are rarely informed by a specific theory and are
naturally bound to the specific method adopted by the research items in the review sample. Usually,
it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. This course has significantly improved my understanding of dissertation and has greater value
in terms of its practical applicability compared to other literature works and articles out there on the
internet. Considering the ever-rising volumes of accounting research, I suspect that demand for such
reviews will remain high in the future. Modell (2022b) reviews institutional research on management
accounting and concludes that parts of this literature show no progress and even some degenerative
tendencies in continuing to draw on one-sided views that predominantly focus on either human
agency or structures to explain institutional processes around management accounting. Table:
Difference between book, annotated bibliography and literature review Researchers may be
confused in the following scenarios Where do I start. To illustrate their argument, they draw on a
review of the use of actor network theory (i.e. the method theory in focus) in management
accounting research. In the following, I mostly use examples of literature reviews published as
standalone papers, as these examples can be more easily traced by the reader. Provides editors with a
list of potential reviewers. Therefore, although cumbersome, authors may need to narrow the initial
scope of the review, refine their research question(s) and re-run their search for literature. The
expansion of knowledge; The discovery of truth; and To make prediction. That is, if we consider a
comprehensive review sample as the cornerstone of systematic reviews ( Rojon et al., 2021; Simsek
et al., 2021 ), reviews of qualitative accounting research may be more relaxed in terms of
systematicity than reviews covering more quantitative research. Put differently, the choice of the use
case and central topic of the literature review shapes the remainder of the review process ( Booth et
al., 2021; Hiebl, 2021; Simsek et al., 2021; Tranfield et al., 2003 ). This process is detailed next. 3.
Process and systematicity of literature reviews identify a review topic; search for and select the
relevant literature; analyze the relevant literature; and report the review findings. But they can also
be part of a story of science working the right way: finding and correcting errors, and publicly
acknowledging when information turns out to be incorrect. Systematic reviews have been introduced
as a more rigorous approach to synthesizing evidence across studies; they rely on a suite of evidence-
based methods aimed at maximizing rigour and minimizing susceptibility to bias. This can be
arranged in various ways (e.g. thematically, chronologically or methodologically). This can include
citation and reference formatting issues (for example, Harvard or APA style errors), or just a straight
out lack of references. Help Center Here you'll find an answer to your question. Purpose: It serves to
provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge within a particular field. What
are the different methods you can use its clear, precise and understandable many thanks
affectionately yours’ Godfrey Thanks for this wonderful resource. The other problem is the
examination committee and the format of proposal of grant sites and funding agencies, which are
based on the principles of quantitative study. Of course, you don’t want to burn precious word count
providing an in-depth history lesson regarding the evolution of the topic (unless that’s one of your
research aims, of course), but you should at least acknowledge any key differences between the old
and the new. By contrast, all the examples of use case (ii) reviews noted above ( Damayanthi and
Gooneratne, 2017; Englund et al., 2011; Englund and Gerdin, 2014; Modell, 2022a, 2022b ) are (co-
)authored by senior scholars. So, as you develop your catalogue of literature, remember to
incorporate both the classics and the more up to date research. In this post, Neal Haddaway
highlights 8 common problems with literature review methods, provides examples for each and
provides practical solutions for ways to mitigate them. Qualitative researchers have a natural curiosity
that leads them to study worlds that interest them and that they otherwise might not have access to.
Holland, Tara, and Rawayda Abdou. “Academic writing challenges.
Likewise, Mahama and Khalifa (2017, p. 324) argue that for qualitative accounting research based
on interviews, the literature review forms the basis of deriving interview questions and later
“determining whether new knowledge is generated from the interview data, thereby paving the way
for the researcher to claim empirical contribution”. Qualitative researchers pursue a holistic and
exclusive perspective. With this truth in mind we must enhance our skills to lead people through
various aspects of change. Apart from such discretion, the most important meta-criterion is a good
fit between the literature review’s research question and inclusion criteria. The Objective of the
Review of the Literature is to. Contextualization: Enables researchers to understand how their work
fits into the broader academic conversation and contributes to the existing body of knowledge. From
a cross-analysis of the research items included in my review sample, I produced three ways in which
management accounting instruments may play a role in the theoretical paradox in question.
Structuring a literature review Directing the argument and synthesising sources Being critical in your
literature review. You can also draw on books written by well-established subject matter experts. The
purpose of writing a literature review is to present the sources you’ve used in your research to your
work’s readers. A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant
to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary,
and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Why
qualitative research in the health professions. Keeping the review sample manageable in this way
may also be achieved by limiting potentially relevant research items according to their publication
date. Check on this list before you start writing a literature review with someone’s help or by
yourself and you will be done with it faster and more efficient than you’ve ever expected to. This is
of particular concern when reviews address key policy- and practice- relevant questions, such as the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or climate change. Something to be conducted at the end of your
research. All these reviews have focused on a certain substantive topic within accounting research or,
in the words of Lukka and Vinnari (2014), a certain domain of accounting research. What can the
body of thought attributed to him tell us about modern responses to COVID. Could you kindly do a
video on how to use your literature review excel template. We observed that quantitative accounting
research was actually in the minority in the domain we covered, and that qualitative accounting
research was much more common. According to the editors and reviewers, several important and
well-cited articles were missing from this sample owing to the restrictions of my keyword search.
Research Methods in the Social Sciences, Lecture 3. Intro. Modell, 2017 ). The latter, more theory-
led view may have the advantage that the underlying theory can be used as an organizing
framework to analyze the findings gathered in the review sample, which may be especially useful for
junior scholars because an informing theory provides them with a basic template of the relationships
to be analyzed based on a specific theory. If your sources involve studies or experiments, note
whether the results were replicated and where, if at all, the studies’ results varied from each other. A
strategy or blueprint that plans the action for carrying through the research data. Elements. To be able
to report these details of the literature search, authors of literature reviews are advised to establish a
clear search strategy with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and document their search in
detail. Conducting a well-written literature review demonstrates understanding of the topic at hand,
giving new findings credibility and supporting evidence. Publishing a literature review as a
standalone paper has several advantages. However, there is a fundamental difference between brief,
narrative approaches to summarising a selection of studies and attempting to reliably and
comprehensively summarise an evidence base to support decision-making in policy and practice. If
your research aims to identify factors that cultivate employee loyalty and commitment, your
literature review needs to focus on existing research that identifies such factors.
This means how it relates to other pieces of research, any existing gaps it fills, any debates to which
it contributes, and where you fit in among others in your field. You can also draw on government
websites, provided they have a strong reputation for objectivity and data quality. This book is part of
the American Psychological Association's Concise Guides to Conducting Behavioral, Health, and
Social Science Research series. More of it, you should pay attention to the most common challenges
inherent to a literature review writing process. Once you have a clear, specific thesis for your work,
write a list of keywords related to that thesis you can use to streamline your source-gathering
process. Finally, besides the above-mentioned problems, regarding research design, there are two
common problems encountered especially by students who want to do qualitative study; sometimes
researchers and research team try to identify everything, even the sample size, in advance when they
design their study because they have a strong background of quantitative research, and this is
completely in contrast with the flexible nature and explorative approach of qualitative research. This
is particularly relevant for standalone review papers. This structure can (and likely will) evolve as
you write, but you need some sort of outline as a starting point. The essentially “diagnostic and
exploratory nature” of qualitative research is invaluable in developing conceptualizations in health as
an evolving discipline. Simoni has been named to head the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. The writer will also Compare the advantages and
disadvantages of using a Gantt. The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks
for its importance, and an educated reader may well be insulted that they are not allowed to judge
the importance for themselves. Digital Sales Sell your publications commission-free as single issues
or ongoing subscriptions. This is a costly mistake, as it always results in extensive rewriting, which
takes a lot longer than just doing it one step at a time. They’ll also be the studies most commonly
cited in textbooks and, of course, Wikipedia (but please don’t use Wikipedia as a source!).
Therefore, special attention is needed on how a qualitative research question will specifically be
structured, organized, and formed in the way to quote the necessary information and elements that
allow the readers to assess and evaluate the study. These presentations not only provide an ideal
opportunity to discuss and develop empirical qualitative accounting research ( Ahrens, 2022 ) but
also to discuss the conclusions and contributions drawn from a literature review of qualitative
accounting research. 5. Conclusions This qualitative insights piece provides an overview of the
typical advantages, use cases, process steps and outputs of literature reviews of qualitative
accounting research. RESEARCH DESIGN. Research Design. A master plan specifying the
methods and procedures for collecting and analyzing the data. Compared with reviews of (mostly)
qualitative accounting research, we can infer that the standards in the latter field differ little from the
above numbers. In our view, such an evidence-based approach was warranted because we sought to
integrate largely disjointed research findings that were originally based on very different theoretical
assumptions. This is of particular concern when reviews address key policy- and practice- relevant
questions, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or climate change. Please continue the journey
of sharing and facilitating the young researchers. Bestselling author Arlene Fink shows readers how
to explain the need for and significance of research, as well as how to explain a study’s findings.
Definitely, the purpose of each research is to expose the truth, so the history of the literature review
is not novel in the research. GIFs Highlight your latest work via email or social media with custom
GIFs. Here, they share their insights on how to overcome seven top research challenges. Build your
foundation on credible academic literature to ensure that your study stands on the proverbial
shoulders of giants. Finally, it is literature review, general reading, and discussion with an expert
supervisor that can help you find the right topic. Extensive snowballing and exchange with
experienced authors in the field ( Hiebl, 2021 ) might, thus, be especially relevant to reviews of
qualitative accounting research. In those (pretty rare) cases, you can use direct quotes (and a citation,
of course).