Are you struggling with writing a literature review or distinguishing it from a state-of-the-art

analysis? You're not alone. Crafting a literature review can be an arduous task, requiring meticulous
research, critical analysis, and coherent synthesis of existing literature on a particular topic. Many
find it challenging to navigate through the vast sea of scholarly articles, books, and other sources to
extract relevant information and present it effectively.

One common difficulty lies in understanding the distinction between a literature review and a state-
of-the-art analysis. While both involve reviewing existing literature, they serve different purposes. A
literature review provides a comprehensive overview of existing research, identifying key themes,
debates, and gaps in knowledge. On the other hand, a state-of-the-art analysis goes beyond
summarizing existing literature to provide an in-depth examination of the current state of research,
including recent advancements, trends, and emerging topics.

If you're struggling to write a literature review or differentiate it from a state-of-the-art analysis, fret
not. Help is at hand. At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we specialize in providing high-quality academic
writing assistance tailored to your specific needs. Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in
conducting thorough literature reviews and state-of-the-art analyses across various disciplines.

By availing our services, you can:

1. Save time and effort: Let our experts handle the extensive research and analysis required for
your literature review or state-of-the-art analysis, freeing up your time to focus on other
aspects of your project.
2. Ensure accuracy and quality: Our writers adhere to rigorous academic standards, ensuring that
your literature review or state-of-the-art analysis is meticulously researched, well-written, and
free from errors.
3. Gain valuable insights: Benefit from our writers' expertise and insights as they identify key
themes, debates, and trends relevant to your topic, helping you develop a deeper
understanding of the subject matter.

Whether you need assistance with writing a literature review, a state-of-the-art analysis, or any other
academic task, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner for all your academic writing needs. Place
your order today and take the first step towards academic success.
Literature Review: Managing Information Overflow: MindMapping, Citation Mappi. In this part,
you lot should outline the following characteristics: Selected topic Inquiry question Related research
question trends and prospects Research methods Expected inquiry results Trunk. It is a result of our
own work as science education and biology education researchers, whether as graduate students and
postdoctoral scholars or newly hired and established faculty members. The point of the study is lost,
suggested findings are unsupported, or important conclusions are invisible to the researcher. For this
you will need to do some critical thinking. In this way, critical reviews attempt to constructively
inform other scholars about the weaknesses of prior research and strengthen knowledge development
by giving focus and direction to studies for further improvement ( Kirkevold, 1997 ). A literature
review is a thorough summary of previous research on a subject. In some cultures, its goal is to
enlighten, protest against something, challenge, educate, inform, comfort, confront, express, and
even heal. Literature Review Research Literature Review is a comprehensive survey of the works
published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in
the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to
the most significant works. Meta-analysis implies the deductive enquiry approach used. Reading a
range of studies should give the researcher the necessary command of the subject in order to suggest
a research question. For example, some researchers have used the term “conceptual framework” to
describe students’ conceptual understandings of a biological phenomenon. A literature review, which
reviews the existing research and information on a selected study area, is a crucial element of a
research study. In a literature review, the sources are integrated into paragraphs based on the
relevance. Some studies have shown an overall recurrence rate of 27% and a local recurrence rate of
12% in colorectal cancer (Malcolm et al. 1981; Obrand and Gordon 1997 ). Describe each work’s
relationship to the others, which is under consideration. When used properly, they can add a lot of
value to your research. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by XH, RL,
and CL. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or
financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Then decide what
information is most relevant to the topic. But the information that practitioners and other researchers
can glean from a systematic literature review is, by its very nature, exceptionally valuable. These
separate reviews provide insights into the stated research question. This is what you want to aim
for—a topic that engenders debate. Create a table using our Literature matrix of the relevant
sources, summarising the key points for easy comparison. BER is an evolving disciplinary area that is
redefining areas of conceptual emphasis as well as orientations toward teaching and learning (e.g.,
Labov et al., 2010; American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011; Nehm, 2019 ).
After intracellular conversion to the active deoxynucleotide, it interferes with the synthesis of DNA
by blocking the conversion of deoxyuridylic acid to thymidylic acid by the cellular enzyme
thymidylate synthetase. If other researchers think that this work is important, even though it is old,
then by all means you should include it in your review. Physical Review Physics Education Research,
15 (2), 020101. Having said that, we realize that the methodological rigour of any review — be it
qualitative, quantitative or mixed — is a critical aspect that should be considered seriously by
prospective authors. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of
time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature,
then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline.
This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s).
Our editors are PhD or PhD candidates, who are native-English speakers. This form of review is
known as qualitative systematic review. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how
to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. So, the purpose of the literature
review is to brand an outlook of existing ideas or thoughts. You lot should just empathize its basic
rules, and that's it. Conducting a literature review, selecting a theoretical framework, and building a
conceptual framework are some of the most difficult elements of a research study. Push dorsum on
the chosen topic and define the number and level of comprehensiveness of your paper. It is important
not to be too narrow or too broad when reading. It will salvage your time every bit you won't need to
freeze on strategies and methods. Most systematic literature reviews originated in the world of
medicine science. The literature review integrates the work of others into a coherent whole. Keto
Blast Gummies Reply Delete Replies Reply GoKeto Gummies August 21, 2022 at 12:41 AM GoKeto
Gummies needs to be like it and this is about it. Selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk
of bias in a duplicate manner using two independent reviewers to avoid random or systematic errors
in the process. Descriptive Research Design and Its Myriad Uses Five Common Mistakes to Avoid
When Writing a Biomedical Research Paper Making Technical Writing in Environmental Engineering
Accessible To Err is Not Human: The Dangers of AI-assisted Academic Writing When Data Speak,
Listen: Importance of Data Collection and Analysis Methods Choosing the Right Research
Methodology: A Guide for Researchers Why is data validation important in research. By reviewing
related materials, a replication of a similar problem may be found better than the problem already
chosen. The first draft of the manuscript was written by XH and all authors commented on previous
versions of the manuscript. How does a well-prepared literature review look like. Physical Review
Physics Education Research, 15 (2), 020101. Although they are quite similar patterns, they are used
to review or summarize information with different kinds of perspectives. Literature Search Strategies
Using psycinfo and other databases. You will also need to record what you searched for and where,
number of results and any limiters you used. Methods used or how the review is being conducted are
usually not stated in a review of this sort. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature
reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. As Boote and Beile (2005, p. 3)
suggested, researchers should be “scholars before researchers.” They point out that having a good
working knowledge of the proposed topic helps illuminate avenues of study. Step 2: Get the
Research Started Designated review teams will go through studies with a sensitive and productive
search strategy. IOC treatment of CRC is associated with a more favorable survival prognosis.
Evaluative annotations evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the source. Popular Publications
Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods Insiderness Using Non-Textual Elements Limitations of
the Study Common Grammar Mistakes Writing Concisely Avoiding Plagiarism Footnotes or
Endnotes. The common chemotherapy regimens for CRC include Cape, Capeox, FOLFOX, etc.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M. Integrative
nursing research — an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing
practice. You might find that the issues and evidence raised are more complex and subtle than you
initially thought. Pretzsch E, Bosch F, Neumann J et al (2019) Mechanisms of Metastasis in
Colorectal Cancer and Metastatic Organotropism: Hematogenous versus Peritoneal Spread. Yet, you
must understand that striving to deliver the best customer experience, we test, interview, and
challenge candidates really tough and only hire the best-performing applicants. Not all topics,
however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a meta-analysis to be conducted. All authors
read and approved the final manuscript. The literature review can help to identify an applicable
theoretical framework. As a result, it builds a basement for further inquiry. Summarize literature and
articles that include self-opinion as a general overview. When is the best option to write an
integrative literature review. Obrand DI, Gordon PH (1997) Incidence and patterns of recurrence
following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. This Research Methods article is designed to
provide an overview of each of these elements and delineate the purpose of each in the educational
research process. What are the benefits of related literature and studies in research. London: SAGE
Publications; 2006. Pawson R., Greenhalgh T., Harvey G., Walshe K. Realist review—a new method
of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Objectivity -- is the author's
perspective even-handed or prejudicial. It also helps the researcher identify the gaps, inconsistencies
as well as contradictions in the literature. For instance, a study that explores the impact of a biology
faculty learning community on the inquiry instruction of faculty could have the following review
areas: learning communities among biology faculty, inquiry instruction among biology faculty, and
inquiry instruction among biology faculty as a result of professional learning. Not a research paper
where you select resources to support one side of an issue versus another. A comprehensive search
would combine a keyword search and a subject search. Step 4: Extraction You can’t use the whole
study or research paper for your review. Look at sources the authors cite to in their work. Literature
reviews help researchers to evaluate the existing literature, to identify a gap in the research area, to
place their study in the existing research and identify future research. Conceptual frameworks allow
researchers to explicitly describe their conceptualization of the relationships among the components
of the phenomenon under study. There are thousands of professional journals that publish research in
psychology and related fields. This is an exercise in intellectual organization and clarity that often
considers what is learned, known, and experienced. A summary is a recap of the important
information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in
a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. Wang ZJ, Tao JH, Chen
JN et al (2019) Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy increases the incidence of anastomotic
leakage after anterior resection of rectal tumors. Findings revealed that there were over 77,000
medical informatics articles published during the covered period in numerous journals and that the
average annual growth rate was 12%. They point out that novice researchers struggle in deciding how
to focus the review, determining the scope of articles needed in the review, and knowing how to be
critical of the articles in the review. It is also important to read seminal studies that are more than 5
years old.
It will salvage your time every bit you won't need to freeze on strategies and methods. If your
literature review is non a role of the thesis and goes equally a stand-alone paper — exist curtailed but
explore the research area in-depth. Searching the extant literature: The next step consists of searching
the literature and making decisions about the suitability of material to be considered in the review (
Cooper, 1988 ). Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a
sense of what your discipline expects. The author acknowledges that the supervisor not only patiently
pointed out the shortcomings, and put forward valuable suggestions for the improvement of the
paper, but also guided and answered in difficulties. To assess the importance of potential prognostic
factors, univariate analysis was performed using log-rank test and Cox’s proportional hazards
regression model. Watch the video below to see the difference between a literature review and an
essay. A lit review should explain and consider all sides of an argument in order to avoid bias, and
areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted. A literature review is a discussion on
the already existing material in the subject area. Posner MR, Bleday R, Huberman M et al (1993)
Impact of combined modality therapy on the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the colon. Give your
interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. A distinction is made between
research findings on the impact of violent cartoons on anti-social behaviour, and the theoretical
literature on the topic. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding
exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. CC BY (Attribution) “ How
to Read an Academic Paper ” by UBCiSchool. These are considered unreliable because they are not
reviewed by other researchers and are often based on little more than common sense or personal
experience. There’s more work related to a systematic literature review, so it makes sense to divide
the work among two or three (or even more) researchers. Download Word doc Download Google
doc Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic. In terms of Vygotsky
(1978), this finding provided new insights into the learning context in which productive interactions
can occur for students. Requirement Through understanding of the topic with relevant studies as
backup and statistical analysis. The process is what is involved in conducting a review of the. Doing
Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Early in the research process, it is
important to conduct a review of the research literature on your topic to refine your research
question, identify appropriate research methods, place your question in the context of other research,
and prepare to write an effective research report. So, the purpose of the literature review is to brand
an outlook of existing ideas or thoughts. You can also start with a classic article or book chapter on
your topic, find its record in PsycINFO (by entering the author’s name or article’s title as a search
term), and link from there to a list of other works in PsycINFO that cite that classic article. A meta-
analysis goes beyond critique and integration and conducts secondary statistical analysis on the
outcomes of similar studies. Use different coloured highlighters or post its on the wall, whatever
works for you. Focal areas of the review or central terms often connect to assumptions and assertions
associated with the framework that pertain to the phenomenon of interest. Here are examples of
other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the
type of review you write: Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the current topic or
focus of the literature review. While a literature review describes what is known and not known
about the phenomenon, the conceptual framework leverages these gaps in describing the current
study ( Maxwell, 2012 ). You will get a feel for what counts as recent for your topic when you start
your literature search.
Certain, both annotated bibliography and literature review list the research topic-related sources.
You may also consult our liaison librarians for assistance with identifying resources. Doing a
literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. This exposition of the literature
review is much different from the chaotic process through which you may have arrived at the
articulation of your problem statement and thesis statement which is often being tweaked till the
very last. We compared the clinical characteristics, short-term postoperative prognosis, safety,
progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the above two groups. Both have
been given separate sections in the structure of the review. A type of research article which describes
one or more new empirical studies conducted by the authors. Given this, while literature reviews are
designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a
number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your
study. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library
catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and
biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can also
use boolean operators to help narrow down your search. At that place is ane sufficient problem in this
type, by the style. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Several
search terms relating to phr s were used during this process. The issues are organized into volumes,
which usually consist of all the issues for a calendar year. Further Readings Generative AI and
Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior
research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue,
area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation
of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Imagine, for example, that you
are interested in the question of whether women and men differ in terms of their ability to recall
experiences from when they were very young. This is different from theoretical frameworks that are
often taken from established literature. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries
Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses
on specific issues. They are usually published monthly or quarterly in individual issues, each of
which contains several articles. A literature review, like essays, must include an introduction, a body,
and a conclusion. CC BY (Attribution) “ How to Read an Academic Paper ” by UBCiSchool. To this
end, they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards
improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table
9.1 outlines the main types of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and
summarizes the main characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. An RRL reviews
as much of the literature possible around a particular research problem. (PDF) Literature Reviews,
Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical The studies often include a literature review, which is a
synthesis of major themes in the literature, or conceptual frameworks, which can be defined as a
network of concepts relevant to the study. What are the sources of relevant literature and studies.
However, we do guarantee that our team will do whatever it takes for your academic success.
Chemotherapy regimens with 5-FU as the core drug can be effective in improving patients’
outcomes. Reply Delete Replies Reply mikon September 27, 2018 at 2:23 AM That is state of the art
because that was written by a professional and not a newbie so we need to guide them about and
make them easy for the students to understand. Their in-depth analysis of the literature signalled that
there is little solid evidence from randomized controlled trials or other studies through the use of phr
s. Essays are often a combination of facts and figures, opinions and ideas of the writer. Design
taxonomies can be used to help shape a literature review. Given that the research question(s) arise
from the literature review, the review should also substantiate the selected methodological approach.