Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review: A Guide to Research Methodology Literature Review

PPT

Welcome to our comprehensive guide on crafting an effective literature review for your research
methodology presentation (PPT). Whether you're a student or a seasoned researcher, navigating
through the vast sea of academic literature can be a daunting task. However, fear not, as we are here
to provide you with valuable insights and practical tips to help you sail smoothly through the process.

Writing a literature review is no easy feat. It requires a meticulous approach, critical thinking, and
extensive research to synthesize existing knowledge and present it in a coherent manner. A well-
crafted literature review not only demonstrates your understanding of the subject matter but also lays
the groundwork for your research methodology presentation.

One of the biggest challenges in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of literature available
on any given topic. Sorting through numerous articles, books, and other sources can be
overwhelming, leaving you feeling lost and unsure of where to begin. Moreover, identifying relevant
sources that contribute meaningfully to your research can be like finding a needle in a haystack.

Another hurdle is the need to critically analyze and evaluate the existing literature. It's not enough to
simply summarize the key points of each source; you must also assess the strengths and weaknesses
of the arguments presented, identify any gaps or contradictions in the literature, and offer your own
insights and interpretations.

Furthermore, organizing your literature review in a logical and coherent manner can be challenging.
You need to structure your review in a way that flows seamlessly from one point to the next, guiding
your audience through the evolution of ideas and arguments in the field.

With so many challenges to overcome, it's no wonder that many students and researchers struggle
with writing a literature review. However, help is at hand. If you find yourself overwhelmed by the
task, consider seeking assistance from a professional writing service like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔.

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance with writing literature reviews, ensuring that your
research methodology presentation is backed by a comprehensive and well-researched review of the
literature. Our team of experienced writers specializes in various academic disciplines and can help
you navigate through the complexities of writing a literature review with ease.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and energy, allowing you to focus on other
aspects of your research methodology presentation. Our writers will work closely with you to
understand your specific requirements and deliver a high-quality literature review that meets your
expectations.

In conclusion, writing a literature review for your research methodology presentation can be a
daunting task. However, with the right approach and assistance from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can
master the art of literature review and create a compelling presentation that showcases your
understanding of the subject matter. So why wait? Order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take
the first step towards academic success!
An source card or index card or system card consists of. She is majorly involved in developing and
reviewing online content plans that engage and resonate with audiences. Sabel et al. (2017) created
this model using their interpretations of these two frameworks in the context of their teaching.
Delimiting a manageable set of publications One aspect of methods overviews that can make
identification and selection challenging is the fact that the universe of literature containing
potentially relevant information regarding most methods-related topics is expansive and often
unmanageably so. As far as we are aware, this is the first published source of concrete guidance for
conducting this type of review. If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor
and your class mates. 2. Decide on the scope of your review How many studies do you need to look
at. Encourages Scholarly Dialogue: Integrates your work into ongoing academic discussions,
influencing future research. For interpretive reviews, meanwhile, the main focus is to develop new
concepts and theories that integrate them, with the implication that the concepts developed become
fully defined towards the end of the analysis. Yang L, Hu H (2019) Visual skeleton and reparative
attention for part-of-speech image captioning system. Give it a Once-Over Find out what's good and
not-so-good about the research. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and other
scholarly sources relevant to a particular area of research. Additional work is needed, however, to
establish guidance that is comprehensive by comparing the experiences from conducting a variety of
methods overviews on a range of methods topics. The aim of any literature review is to summarize
and synthesize the arguments and ideas of existing knowledge in a particular field without adding
any new contributions. Kharma Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Federal
University of Lafia, P.M.B 146, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Christopher Ifeanyi Eke You can
also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Corresponding author Correspondence to
Ahmad Sami Al-Shamayleh. Journals are also known as periodicals, magazines are published on a
regular. While observing the same “objective event,” the scientists are operating under different
theoretical frameworks that provide a particular perspective or “lens” for the interpretation of the
phenomenon. Additionally, verify the accuracy and consistency of citations and references based on
the chosen citation style (e.g., APA, MLA). This comprehensive revision process guarantees a
polished and well-structured literature review. Journals are also known as periodicals, magazines are
published on a regular. Each data-collection and analysis decision connected to understanding the
influence of collaborative work. There is no single method to go about this intellectual work. In other
words, the aim in methods overviews is to seek coverage of the qualitative concepts relevant to the
methods topic at hand. HYPOTHESIS A hypotheses is a hunch, assumption, suspicion, assertion or
an idea about a phenomenon, relationship or situation, the reality or truth of which we do not know.
Systematic Review. NU517 Clinical Scholarship for Evidence Based Practice Cornelia C. What is
Research ?. gy. Content. Definition of Research. Research Methodology. PICO. Population- Adult
hospitalized patients with hypertension Intervention- manual sphygmomanometer. A meta-analysis is
the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of these studies. The review of literature
following this opening section comprises two subsections. This clarifies the need for their study,
which is described and highlighted through specific research aims. A literature reviews can also
make up a separate section in a paper. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC,
Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. Conventionally, a data abstraction
form—consisting of numerous distinct conceptually defined fields to which corresponding
information from the source publication is recorded—is developed and employed.
Step 6: Edit and Proofread In the final phase, conduct a thorough review, focusing on clarity and
coherence. Authors from our team are degree holders and also have considerable writing experience.
You can use their samples to improve your literature review or order a custom one. Supplementary
Material Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of learning. In our own writing of
literature reviews, there are often many drafts. Assess the methodology, findings, and limitations of
each study to showcase your analytical skills. Information extracted from a printed source is
recorded on the. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on.
The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the
beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Table 1
summarizes the key distinctions among these elements. Our customer service team will review your
report and will be in touch. ?5.00 3.00 1 review BUY NOW Save for later ?5.00 3.00 1 review BUY
NOW Save for later Last updated 7 September 2018 Share this Share through email Share through
twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Business Teaching
Resources 2.91 12 reviews Not the right resource. However, if there are some points that need
clarification or are missing from the overall context, they should be mentioned. Theoretical
frameworks are not arbitrary, but purposefully selected. Thus, generic challenges give rise to
principles, which in turn give rise to strategies. When evidence cannot be accommodated by the
selected framework, reviewers then develop new themes or concepts from which they construct a
new expanded framework. The choice between a chronological, thematic, theoretical, or
methodological approach depends on the nature of your topic and the goals of your review. The
purpose of literature review such as to identify gaps in the literature, major seminal works, provide a
context for your own research, etc can be showcased with this PPT layout. Paper presented at the
European conference on computer vision. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th Conference
of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Ojala T, Pietikainen M,
Maenpaa T (2000) Gray scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns.
In the final step, we developed analytic conclusions based on the narrative summaries about the
sampling-related concepts within each methodological tradition for which clarity, consistency, or
comprehensiveness of the available guidance appeared to be lacking. High-quality graphics ensure
that pixelation does not occur. Not all topics, however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a
meta-analysis to be conducted. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area. Age of
Reason (The Enlightenment). 1750-1800 Began in Europe with philosophers and scientists. Dr. NN
Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. Within
this review, the authors point out contradictory findings among research on novel student
discoveries. Literature review report on “an analytical study on working conditions of lo. Is the
scientific manuscript reliable and trustworthy. This is an exercise in intellectual organization and
clarity that often considers what is learned, known, and experienced. Limitations are usually
addressed by the research team in some way to ensure a sound and acceptable research process.
Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings.
Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in social science,Mumbai:himalaya. Uncover connections
and relationships among diverse research pieces to construct a cohesive narrative within your
literature review. Alshurafa M, Briel M, Akl EA, Haines T, Moayyedi P, Gentles SJ, Rios L, Tran C,
Bhatnagar N, Lamontagne F, et al. We have found that being explicit in a conceptual framework
means using accepted terminology, referencing prior work, and clearly noting connections between
terms. This description can also highlight gaps in the literature or suggest potential contributions to
the field of study. Indicates potential directions for future research. By combining information from
all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects of health care
than those derived from the individual studies included within a review. In education, a well-
conceptualized and well-executed review provides a summary of the research that has already been
done on a specific topic and identifies questions that remain to be answered, thus illustrating the
current research project’s potential contribution to the field and the reasoning behind the
methodological approach selected for the study ( Maxwell, 2012 ). Their findings highlighted aspects
of Vygotsky’s (1978) theory of learning. In the final step, we developed analytic conclusions based
on the narrative summaries about the sampling-related concepts within each methodological tradition
for which clarity, consistency, or comprehensiveness of the available guidance appeared to be
lacking. A comprehensive literature review on image captioning methods and We found 548 papers
using a systematic literature review (SLR) technique, of which 38 were identified as primary studies
and so underwent in-depth analysis.. The research methodology is introduced in Section. If you
choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. An
evaluation of traditional and gamified, adaptive preclass reading quizzes. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing Fang F,
Wang H, Chen Y, Tang P (2018) Looking deeper and transferring attention for image captioning.
This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing
a literature review. Digital access to research papers, academic texts, review articles, reference
databases and public data sets are all sources of information that are available to enrich. Books are
written for specific audiences.the material in books are presented in a. Each of these scientists brings
specialized knowledge, experiences, and values to this phenomenon, and these influence the
interpretation of the phenomenon. Other studies have presented a research logic model or flowchart
of the research design as a conceptual framework. To operationalize this strategy of sampling for
influence, we sought to identify both the most influential authors within a qualitative research
tradition (all of whose citations were subsequently screened) and the most influential publications on
the topic of interest by non-influential authors. The proper sequence allows moving from one
question to another, avoiding chaos in writing. E.g., a body part in the standard literature review
samples often is organized chronologically, moving from the older findings to the newest research.
The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English
editors. However, new educational researchers often have questions about literature reviews that are
foundational to SALSA or other approaches. This can make searching the text for relevant concepts
based on keywords unreliable. Does the research use the usual methods, or is it trying something
new. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review. Being built on
existing knowledge they help the researcher to even turn the wheels of the topic of research. Nova
has also worked as a technical and scientific writer. Now, let's explore some examples of literature
reviews that can assist you in crafting your own. In the research process, there is often a constant
back and forth among these elements as the study evolves.
Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. In
another example, Lane (2016) integrated research from science identity, the ethic of care, the sense
of belonging, and an expertise model of student success to form a conceptual framework that
addressed the critiques of other frameworks. Systematic approaches to successful literature review.
2nd ed. London: Sage; 2016. Hannes K, Lockwood C. A research paper assigned in a course A
thesis or dissertation A grant proposal An article intended for publication in a journal All these
instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can
demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic. A solid literature review clearly
anchors the proposed study in the field and connects the research question(s), the methodological
approach, and the discussion. In a more recent example, Sbeglia et al. (2021) illustrated how a
conceptual framework influences the methodological choices and inferences in studies by
educational researchers. It helps you to understand the research area about what are the
methodologies already present in that research area. Alter the style, size, and the background of the
slides. If yes then visit Geoffandfrancis.co.uk and get best ideas for your literature review. Finally,
notable findings of the new study are discussed in reference to those described in the literature
review. The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of
works of literature such as novels and plays). Uncover connections and relationships among diverse
research pieces to construct a cohesive narrative within your literature review. When a theoretical
framework is selected, it should clearly connect to all parts of the study. Conclusions We believe that
the principles and strategies provided here will be useful to anyone choosing to undertake a
systematic methods overview. Both the strategy proposed and the BFFS approach to research
synthesis are notable for their rigorous and transparent means to adapt a final set of concepts to the
content under review. This involved a flexible approach that combined multiple indicators of
influence to avoid the dilemma that any single indicator might provide inadequate coverage. A good
integrative review or Academic writing literature review must meet the entire primary research
standard with clarity, consistency, and replication. You can similarly convert our content to any other
desired screen aspect ratio. Step 2: Analyze and Select Sources In the second phase of your research,
it is essential to carefully evaluate and select sources that directly contribute to your research
question. Searching beyond standard bibliographic databases An important reality affecting
identification and selection in overviews of the methods literature is the increased likelihood for
relevant publications to be located in sources other than journal articles (which is usually not the case
for overviews of empirical research, where journal articles generally represent the primary publication
type). Step 3: Identify Connections Synthesize information from selected sources, identifying
common themes, patterns, and trends. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes
the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if
applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the
knowledge on the topic reviewed. And many authors of scientific manuscripts believe that they are
only surveys of what are the researches are done on the chosen topic. Consolidated criteria for
reportingqualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
Example: In a review of psychological studies on memory, sections could be organized around
cognitive, behavioral, and neuroscientific theories. Tertiary literature sources also called as “search
tools” are. This is not uncommon, as conceptual frameworks can serve as catalysts for concerted
research efforts that systematically explore a phenomenon (e.g., Reynolds et al., 2012; Brownell and
Kloser, 2015 ). These elements are important in shaping the construction of new knowledge. A
literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. In essence, a well-
crafted literature review informs and elevates your research, ensuring its relevance and impact within
your academic field.
This helps create a coherent narrative and highlights the connections between different works. To
operationalize this strategy of sampling for influence, we sought to identify both the most influential
authors within a qualitative research tradition (all of whose citations were subsequently screened)
and the most influential publications on the topic of interest by non-influential authors. One can
identify many references relating to the selected topic. By summarizing what is known, the literature
review points to what needs to be known, which in turn guides decisions about methodology. A
comprehensive literature review on image captioning methods and metrics based on deep learning
technique Published: 20 February 2024 Cite this article Ahmad Sami Al-Shamayleh 1, Omar Adwan
2, Mohammad A. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Young B, Jones D, Sutton A. Clinical problem.
Purpose of this systematic review. When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review,
don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Demonstrate how each piece of research
contributes to the overall understanding of your chosen topic. Ann McKibbon Faculty of Social
Work, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada David B. Paper presented at the European Conference
on Computer Vision. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO
MANAGEMENT in the. It is important to note that our primary objective was to initiate
methodological discussion by stimulating reflection on what rigorous methods for this type of
review should look like, leaving the development of more complete guidance to future work. Decide
which studies to be included in the meta-analysis 2. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE
conference on computer vision and pattern recognition Dai J, Li Y, He K, Sun J (2016) R-FCN:
Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks. It is essential that a novice researcher
learn to explicitly state a theoretical framework, because all research questions are being asked from
the researcher’s implicit or explicit assumptions of a phenomenon of interest ( Schwandt, 2000 ).
EPH 7112 LECTURE 2: CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF RESEARCH. Contents.
Characteristics of Scientific Research Types of Research Basic Research Applied Research Academic
Research Industrial Research. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to
your research question. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. Google
Scholar is an interesting searching tool which helps in searching different journals and magazines.
Determining the scope of the reading is not always straightforward. The authors attributed the
variation to the different types of helping behaviors of students. And many authors of scientific
manuscripts believe that they are only surveys of what are the researches are done on the chosen
topic. Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your
search. In applying this approach, we advise a rigorous approach, documenting how supportive
quotes or references to the original texts are carried forward in the successive steps of analysis to
allow for easy verification. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area. When
reviewing flagged text, the reviewer occasionally encountered an unanticipated concept significant
enough to warrant being added as a new field to the abstraction form. Our aim in this paper is thus
to initiate discussion about what might constitute a rigorous approach to systematic methods
overviews. Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a
literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also
developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any
other stakeholders in your topic. Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can
copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the
citation to our free Citation Generator.