Youth Tobacco Prevention Literature Review

Writing a literature review on youth tobacco prevention is a challenging task that requires a
comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, as well as the ability to critically analyze and
synthesize existing research. Navigating through the vast array of studies, articles, and reports can be
overwhelming, and ensuring that your review is thorough and well-organized is essential.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review on youth tobacco prevention is the sheer
volume of literature available on the topic. With research spanning various disciplines such as public
health, psychology, sociology, and more, it can be challenging to identify which sources are most
relevant and reliable for inclusion in your review.

Furthermore, synthesizing the findings of multiple studies and identifying common themes, trends,
and gaps in the literature requires a high level of analytical skill. It's crucial to not only summarize
individual studies but also to critically evaluate their methodologies, strengths, and limitations to
provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in the field of youth tobacco
prevention.

Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of writing a literature review on youth tobacco
prevention, many individuals may find themselves in need of assistance to ensure that their review
meets the highest academic standards. In such cases, ordering a custom literature review from a
reputable academic writing service like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can be a valuable solution.

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance from experienced writers who are well-versed in the
latest research and methodologies related to youth tobacco prevention. By entrusting your literature
review to their team of professionals, you can rest assured that your review will be meticulously
researched, carefully written, and tailored to your specific requirements.

In conclusion, writing a literature review on youth tobacco prevention is a challenging endeavor that
requires careful attention to detail, critical analysis, and synthesis of complex information. For those
seeking assistance in crafting a high-quality literature review that meets the rigorous standards of
academic research, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is the trusted partner you can rely on.
However, their impact on SLT use by youths aged 12-18 has not been evaluated. See Full PDF
Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. On the other hand, it is possible that smokeless tobacco may
be substituted for cigarettes when policies focus largely on cigarette procurement (e.g., taxes on
cigarettes, compliance with cigarette sales laws) and on smoking (clean air laws), rather than to-
bacco use more generally. Th is information in turn will provide a better basis for designing and
implementing more effective community interventions to reduce and prevent adolescent smoking. At
90-day follow-up, the cessation rate was 10.6% for the 2-session group and 14.1% for the 4-session
group, for an overall quit rate of 12.3%. 104 The modest quit rate is consistent with other self-help
minimal interventions for tobacco use. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012. The images and messages
were explicit: smoking increases the risk for numerous serious physical consequences throughout life,
including premature death from heart disease or cancer. The comprehensive approach should
embrace prevention programs that include broader social networks of influences (that is, parents,
community, and media) set in the context of a community effort. Also, you can type in a page
number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book. One hundred smokeless users were
randomized to receive active (2 mg) nicotine gum or placebo (0 mg) nicotine gum as an adjunctive
aid in a five-session group counseling program. To ensure the greatest impact, schools should
implement all seven recommendations. Care-A-Van Children With Medical Handicaps (CMH)
Communicable Diseases Covid-19 Health Awareness Events School Immunizations Immunizations
Laboratory Services. School-based smoking prevention efforts have also been made more effective
when reinforced by broad-based community programs. Moreover, these methods are now being
applied with success to preventing smokeless tobacco use. Lo- cal youth access interventions
generally involve a com- bination of compliance checks, penalties for violations, merchant education
and training programs, and commu- nity education and mobilization. The questions asked, therefore,
by researchers were (1) If adolescents' sense of self-worth were increased, would they establish a
health-related value system that would preclude tobacco use. R01-CA138956 ( Local To bacco
Policy and Youth Smoking ) and the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP; trdrp.org
) Grant No. 19CA-016 ( Retail Access to Tobacco and Youth Smoking Behavior ). Telerik QA
Academy. Table of Contents. Test Planning Test Prioritization Entry Criteria Exit Criteria Test
Estimation Test Strategy, Test Approach. Secondhand smoke also is smoke that has been exhaled
(breathed out) by the person smoking. There was a 15.4% attrition rate, with 110 subjects
completing treatment. E-cigarette use increased from 11.7% to 20.8% among high school students
and from 3.3% to 4.9% among middle school students from 2017 to 2018. But e-cigarettes and other
products like cigarillos, hookah and smokeless tobacco pose a significant threat. One study found
that intensive, face-to-face recruitment is better than public address and other announcements and
posters. 86 When the participants are referred by school authorities for infractions of school smoking
policies, quit rates are likely not to be high. Test Security: 2012 Test Security Supplement Launch of
Web-based Texas Test Administrator Online Training Modules. A compelling body of evidence
suggests that int ervention s at the state and federal l evels can, when implemented in combination,
reduce youth tobacco use. Finally, most of the available re- search has been cross-sectional. These
efforts vary and include using print and electronic media to reach a broad community, using specific
targeted programs (smoking cessation), and targeting community leaders and organizations to
change community practices in specific ways to reduce tobacco use (for example, enforcing age
restrictions on sale of tobacco in local stores). CoEHAR considers its responsibility to disseminate
scientific information on health-risk related to smoking. The effects of local policies are far less well-
studied but appear to also reduce youth use and may complement state efforts. Where possible, we
highlight the effects on both tobacco types. Lo- cal youth access interventions generally involve a
com- bination of compliance checks, penalties for violations, merchant education and training
programs, and commu- nity education and mobilization.
Find out what's happening in Lakewood with free, real-time updates from Patch. Care-A-Van
Children With Medical Handicaps (CMH) Communicable Diseases Covid-19 Health Awareness
Events School Immunizations Immunizations Laboratory Services. Few stud- ies, however, have
examined tobacco outlet density and tobacco use. Fourth, although some studies have invest igated
how use of r etail and social sourc es of tobacco are interrelated, additional research is necessary to
establish how changes in retail availability influences the use of social and commercial sou rces of
tobacco. Programs that are multi-behavioral and target several drug use behaviors (such as life skills
programs) can be effective if adequate time is allocated to social reinforcement components such as
resistance skills specific to tobacco use. Run time: 13:00. Vocabulary pg. 551. Environmental tobacco
smoke Mainstream smoke. The message often was presented in a manner intended to arouse fear. It
uses liquid nicotine refills called “pods,” which contain at least as much nicotine as a pack of
cigarettes. Although some interventions to reduce youth tobacco use originate at the state or national
level, others occur at the local level. Still, while current studies have demonstrated that adolescents
from different environments and cultural backgrounds are generally responsive to social influence
programs, an as-. Participants consisted of 6800 (1996) and 6980 (1999) students in Massachusetts
public school grades 6-12 (approximate ages 11-18 years). The life skills approach focuses on
knowledge, capabilities, and skills to enact pertinent behaviors, such as not smoking around peers.
Minors (under 18) who try smoking for the first time each day - 3 000. Not consenting or
withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions. As with adults, it poses a
serious health threat to youth and young adults in the United States and has significant implications
for this nation’s public and economic health in the future. Most new smokers (59%) were younger
than age 18 when they first smoked cigarettes. Evidence regarding the effects of local policies on
tobacco use by young people is mixed and has focused almost exclusively on smoking. Preventing
Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Results of
investigations of the effects of reduced yout h sales on yout h use, ho weve r, remain i nconcl usive.
In addition, policies need to be ac- companied by enforcement to ensure that policy viola- tions carry
penalties. Second, even where sales rates are relatively low, the probability of purchase success can
be very high with multiple attempts. The Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Among Young
People Introduction Smoking During Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Critical Period for
Health Nicotine Addiction Smoking and Body Weight Pulmonary Function and Respiratory
Symptoms and Diseases Cardiovascular Effects of Tobacco Use Evidence Summary Conclusions
References 3. Adolescents who are regular smokers experience the same withdrawal symptoms as
adults when they attempt to quit. Prevention programs have targeted social influences that are most
proximal to smoking behavior, but these interventions have not affected more distal factors. Few
studies have examined the impact of local MIP laws and enforcement on youth tobacco use. For the
purpose of this review, we focus on the latter. Thank Share We’ve removed the ability to reply as we
work to make improvements. Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if
available. The curriculum focused on health consequences of tobacco use, celebrity endorsements of
non-use, social consequences of use, rehearsal of methods to resist peer pressure, and decision
making. Seldom have SLT prevention programs been implemented independently of other substance
use prevention efforts or more general tobacco use prevention efforts.
Given the resources we have and what we know about the affected population, will this work?”.
Preliminary evidence from clinical studies with adults shows modest quit rates that are comparable to
smoking cessation (15% quit rates at 1-year follow-up). Attrition was high: 48.4% from session one
to session five, and an additional 60.8% from session five to the 3-month follow-up. Elaine Auld
Michael Fagen Patricia Mail Richard Windsor Scott K. Flay and Petraitis review 13 theories to
account for the initiation and use of tobacco by youth, and identify gaps in each of them. 11 Their
approach considers distal causes, such as behavior of family members and genetic inheritance of
traits, as indirect influences on. By this problem-solving approach, students learn self-control skills
for smoking prevention coupled with self-reward for personal successes. 23. Since the 1980s,
cigarette butts have consistently comprised 30-40% of all items collected in annual international
coastal and urban cleanups. Eight men (with a mean age of 32 years and who had used SLT on
average for 9 years) participated in 8 1-hour behavioral treatment sessions over a period of 7 weeks
in small groups of 3 subjects each. In contrast, all five girls dropped out during the program and
were unsuccessful. In addition, 2009 MTF results show that, while not at the peak levels seen in the
mid-1990’s, 30-day prevalence rates for smokeless tobacco use increased significantly in 2009,
especially for boys, who represent the primary consumers. The goal of the program is to affect social
norm change around tobacco use and counter tobacco industry targeted marketing tactics towards
youth. OSH saves lives and saves money by preventing and reducing tobacco use. States use OSH
funds to prevent kids from using tobacco, reduce secondhand smoke exposure, help smokers quit,
and reduce disparities in tobacco use. Without significant resources it is unlikely that schools would
be in a position to implement the CDC guidelines listed above. Participants consisted of 6800 (1996)
and 6980 (1999) students in Massachusetts public school grades 6-12 (approximate ages 11-18
years). Teen-Age Attitudes and Behavior Concerning Tobacco. Tobler examined 143 studies of drug-
use prevention programs for sixth- through twelfth-grade students and found that these programs do
have an effect on behavior, skills, and knowledge. Click here to buy this book in print or download it
as a free PDF, if available. Of the 70 boys in the program, 30 were in the mint snuff groups, 15 in the
gum groups, and 25 in the lecture-only groups. Contents Expand All Collapse All Message from
Kathleen Sebelius Message from Howard Koh Foreword Preface Acknowledgments 1. The
intervention had a significant effect on cigarette use, smokeless tobacco use, and combined use of
cigarettes and smokeless tobacco at the 3-year follow-up. Many states have adopted legisla- tion that
penalizes youth who purchase or possess to- bacco. No published studies have examined the impact
of outlet density on smokeless tobacco use. In a twenty four-town randomized study, Jason et al.
Native Americans present these programs, which adapt materials to specific tribal groups. Atlanta
(GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2012. Eight structural elements are
considered both necessary and sufficient for effective school-based smoking prevention programs.
These features were identified by a National Cancer Institute (NCI) panel of experts who analyzed
15 intervention trials conducted by NCI. 38 These essential elements, listed below, were confirmed
in Rooney's meta-analysis of research studies 1974-1989. 39. For the same brand of cigarettes, the
maximum price was 1.7 to 1.8 times higher than the lowest price. Keywords: Tobacco; Youth;
Environmental Strategies; Local Policies 1. The final review includes investigations pub- lished in
peer-reviewed journals that examined the associations of local US tobacco control policies with
tobacco use, including smokeless tobacco, among youth.
Approximately 80% of tobacco users initiate use before age 18 years. The relationship between retail
access policies and smokeless tobacco use has been less well-studied. Here are 11 reasons why our
work to make tobacco use a thing of the past is more important now than ever before. Like several of
the interventions cited above, methodological limitations of this body of re- search includes the
difficulty of determining the differ- ential effects of state vs. The components all share the goal of
making the social environment supportive of non-use or cessation, and therefore could increase the
effects of a school-based program by creating a social context for the program that enhances the
effects of its messages. 46 Also, community programs can reach adolescents who are missed by
school-based programs, either because they have dropped out of school, are absent during the
intervention, or are not influenced by the school program. Learn more here The views expressed in
this post are the author's own. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Tobacco and Youth Tobacco use continues to
be the leading preventable cause of premature death in the United States, killing over 430,000 people
yearly. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1985. The aim is to prevent the spread of
this addiction among the new generations. The study will proceed from a conceptual model that
includes commun ity-level v ariables (tobacco policies and availability, population density, SES,
ethnic composition, communi ty disorgan ization), as well as n eighborhood and individual-level
factors (smoking, smoking beliefs, per- ceived law enforcement, personal risk factors, background
characteristics). Only a few studies have considered h ow diff erences in local env ironmental appro-
aches to youth tobacco control may affect initiation to. Of the 7 men completing the program, 6
remained abstinent at the 9-month follow-up. 100. Although some interventions to reduce youth
tobacco use originate at the state or national level, others occur at the local level. Pearson Program
Excellence Award Distinguished Fellow Award Dorothy Nyswander Health Equity Award Graduate
Student Research Paper Award Health Education Technology Innovation Award Helen P. In a
survey, 68% of SLT users reported that they had tried to quit, with an average of four attempts each,
and 54% reported that they would make a quit attempt in the subsequent year. 96 Third, users report
prior quit attempts. We also reviewed references identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles
and books and elicited suggestions from experts in the field of tobacco control. Smoking and
Tobacco Control Monograph No. 5. NIH Pub. No. 94-3693. USDHHS, 1994. 143-185. To this end,
we are currently conducting an NCI- funded study of the impact of local tobacco policies on youth
tobacco attitudes a nd use in 50 cities in Cali fornia. The images and messages were explicit:
smoking increases the risk for numerous serious physical consequences throughout life, including
premature death from heart disease or cancer. Most SLT programs focus on social influence
components and include information about the detrimental health effects of regular SLT use. Openly
accessible at 39 39 tobacco use and tobacco use trajectories over time. Openly accessible at 41 41
and continued cigarette smoking. No other laboratory in the federal government has these
capabilities. The long-term objective of the study i s to pro vide a better u nderstanding of how local
tobacco policies and enforcement relate to adolescent smoking. The curriculum on combined
consequences was superior to all other program curricula for reducing initial and weekly use of
smokeless tobacco and cigarettes. For example, the American Cancer Society's Fresh Start Adult
Smoking Cessation Program was adapted for youths 18 to 22 years of age using SLT, but the
program was ineffective. 99 An intervention that has not been adapted for youths but was successful
with adult men involved four components: cue extinction, setting a target date for quitting, the use
of a buddy system, and relapse prevention. Think of 20 or more things you want to do or accomplish
before you “kick the bucket”. We are finishing up a successful year of tobacco prevention with
funding provided from the Ohio Department of Health. The program first targeted the most proximal
influences on youth initiation of smoking (school and parents) and subsequently the more distal
influences (community organization and policy changes). In addition, license suspension or revo-
cation can serve as a punishment for retailers violating youth access regulations.
In a twenty four-town randomized study, Jason et al. At the 3-month follow-up, there was no effect
from the intervention; 6.8% of clinic participants and 7.9% of controls were abstinent. Openly
accessible at 40 K.O. (2005) Tobacco control policies and the concurrent use of smokeless tobacco
and cigarettes among men, 1992-2002. Yet a robust science base exists on social, biological, and
environmental factors that influence young people to use tobacco, the physiology of progression
from experimentation to addiction, other health effects of tobacco use, the epidemiology of youth
and young adult tobacco use, and evidence-based interventions that have proven effective at
reducing both initiation and prevalence of tobacco use among young people. Pearson Program
Excellence Award Distinguished Fellow Award Dorothy Nyswander Health Equity Award Graduate
Student Research Paper Award Health Education Technology Innovation Award Helen P.
Controlling for a range of con- founders, Novak et al. Results, adjusted for race and grade, showed a
significant effect of the program on reducing cigarette smoking. In Minnesota, 81 schools were
invited to receive one of four recommended smoking prevention programs and to participate in a
study. How is the distribution of t related to the unit normal. As with adults, it poses a serious health
threat to youth and young adults in the United States and has significant implications for this
nation’s public and economic health in the future. Register for a free account to start saving and
receiving special member only perks. When we discuss “interventions”, “strate- gies”, and
“approaches”, we include the complement of environmental policies and enforcement that synergisti-
cally target youth tobacco use. The meta-analysis took into account the clustering of students in
schools and used the school as the unit of analysis. To combine the results of the studies in a rigorous
manner, we considered using quantitative statistical tech- niques. FDA’s longest-running campaign, “
The Real Cost,” educates teens on the health consequences of smoking cigarettes and in recent years
has prioritized e-cigarette prevention messaging. In the last step, we ask, “How can we implement
the intervention. One survey is the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Lo- cal
youth access interventions generally involve a com- bination of compliance checks, penalties for
violations, merchant education and training programs, and commu- nity education and mobilization.
The outcome variables were changes in reported tobacco use, smokeless tobacco, and cigarettes, at 1-
year follow-up (eighth grade). While quitting earlier in life yields greater health benefits, quitting
smoking is beneficial to health at any age. Newsletter sections: Introduction, CDC’s Work, The
Public Health Approach, Out of the CDC Museum Collection, and Teen Talk. School-based research
programs have explored a variety of approaches, which have helped identify the most useful
program elements. More than 16 million people live with at least one disease caused by smoking, and
58 million nonsmoking Americans are exposed to secondhand smoke. In all cases a strong school-
based prevention intervention was embedded in a community-wide program. Th is information in
turn will provide a better basis for designing and implementing more effective community
interventions to reduce and prevent adolescent smoking. Third, few, if any, studies have investigated
the processes through which potential effects of local policies on youth tobacco use and trajectories
may be mediated. Community programs that include parent involvement, school rules and
regulations with regard to tobacco use, community organizations, and use of media can increase the
effectiveness of school-based programs. Some community components have also focused on
reducing youth access to tobacco by educating store clerks or conducting sting operations at
convenience stores known to be lax in checking the age of purchasers (see chapter 7). The study
recruited 25 boys, ages 14-18, 11 of whom constituted a comparison group by receiving delayed
treatment. The increase in youth e-cigarette use happened at the same time as increased JUUL sales.
Contents Expand All Collapse All Message from Kathleen Sebelius Message from Howard Koh
Foreword Preface Acknowledgments 1.
Fourth, although some studies have invest igated how use of r etail and social sourc es of tobacco
are interrelated, additional research is necessary to establish how changes in retail availability
influences the use of social and commercial sou rces of tobacco. Sufficient quantitative data
however, were often not available for key outcome variables. To this end, we are currently
conducting an NCI- funded study of the impact of local tobacco policies on youth tobacco attitudes
a nd use in 50 cities in Cali fornia. Remember learning about the CDC Tobacco Laboratory. In the
program, five sessions of tobacco education were provided at the monthly club meetings by
volunteers (41 adults and 26 teens) trained to deliver the program in their locales. See Full PDF
Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A
Report of the Surgeon General. Thank Share We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make
improvements. At 3-month follow-up, 3 (15.2%) of the subjects randomized to treatment were
confirmed as still abstinent. The TNT project implements four different prevention curricula
independent of one another. At 90-day follow-up, the cessation rate was 10.6% for the 2-session
group and 14.1% for the 4-session group, for an overall quit rate of 12.3%. 104 The modest quit rate
is consistent with other self-help minimal interventions for tobacco use. The meta-analysis showed
that the rational approach had very little impact on smoking behavior, that the developmental and
social norms approaches had equivalent and intermediate effects on smoking behavior, and that the
social reinforcement approach had the greatest effect on smoking behavior. 30. All community
programs share a focus on altering the social environment or social context in which tobacco
products are obtained or consumed. Still, while current studies have demonstrated that adolescents
from different environments and cultural backgrounds are generally responsive to social influence
programs, an as-. A pattern maintained (though not as strongly) at 2-year follow-up. Multiple-grade
interventions and more intensive interventions can increase this effect. We highlight results of the
extant literature, hypo- thesize possible effects where research is lacking, and suggest where futu re
studie s might be warranted. The program first targeted the most proximal influences on youth
initiation of smoking (school and parents) and subsequently the more distal influences (community
organization and policy changes). Implementation and enforcement of minor in posses- sion (MIP)
policies are aimed at reducing social access to tobacco products. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, 1994. 237. Participants consisted of 6800 (1996) and 6980 (1999)
students in Massachusetts public school grades 6-12 (approximate ages 11-18 years). Additional
research is merited to investigate these plausible relationships. Yet a robust science base exists on
social, biological, and environmental factors that influence young people to use tobacco, the
physiology of progression from experimentation to addiction, other health effects of tobacco use, the
epidemiology of youth and young adult tobacco use, and evidence-based interventions that have
proven effective at reducing both initiation and prevalence of tobacco use among young people. A
survey by the Gallup Organization reported that 38% of youths ages 12 to 17 had some interest in
youth-targeted smoking cessation programs. 89 Research is needed to discover from youths the kinds
of assistance they will respond to and some of the barriers that keep them from seeking assistance in
quitting tobacco use. Adolescents who are regular smokers experience the same withdrawal
symptoms as adults when they attempt to quit. Strategies include those that target access via retail
and social sources, clean air laws that restrict where individuals can smoke, school policies, and
minor in possession laws. For the purpose of this review, we focus on the latter. In addition, policies
need to be ac- companied by enforcement to ensure that policy viola- tions carry penalties. See
reviews. See all. Recent Activity Clear Turn Off Turn On Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and
Young Adults Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults Your browsing activity is
empty. Trends for grades 8, 10, and 12 were compared to those seen nationally and in the northeast
region in the Monitoring the Future study.