The document discusses the dimensions and proposes the existence of a 4th dimension. It explains:
1) Current models use 3 spatial dimensions (length, width, height) plus coordinates to locate objects in space.
2) To prove a 4th dimension, a 4-axis model is needed where each axis is perpendicular to the others and passes through the origin. However, no such 4D model is possible within our 3D space.
3) Time is often proposed as the 4th dimension, though it is abstract and non-spatial. The document questions whether time should be considered the lowest dimension instead of the fourth.
The document discusses the dimensions and proposes the existence of a 4th dimension. It explains:
1) Current models use 3 spatial dimensions (length, width, height) plus coordinates to locate objects in space.
2) To prove a 4th dimension, a 4-axis model is needed where each axis is perpendicular to the others and passes through the origin. However, no such 4D model is possible within our 3D space.
3) Time is often proposed as the 4th dimension, though it is abstract and non-spatial. The document questions whether time should be considered the lowest dimension instead of the fourth.
The document discusses the dimensions and proposes the existence of a 4th dimension. It explains:
1) Current models use 3 spatial dimensions (length, width, height) plus coordinates to locate objects in space.
2) To prove a 4th dimension, a 4-axis model is needed where each axis is perpendicular to the others and passes through the origin. However, no such 4D model is possible within our 3D space.
3) Time is often proposed as the 4th dimension, though it is abstract and non-spatial. The document questions whether time should be considered the lowest dimension instead of the fourth.
We already know that objects can theoretically be in either the 1st Dimension, 2nd Dimension, or the 3rd Dimension. The question is can there be a 4th Dimension? Let us start at the very beginning, 3D means 3 axes which are commonly denoted as xyz.
The purpose of the 3-axis model is to help
represent an object in terms of it`s Height, Length, Width, X-offset, Y-offset and Z-offset. The first 3 (Height, Length and Width) describe the space, or volume, the object is occupying meanwhile the last 3 (X-offset, Y-offset and Z- offset) describe the relative position of the object in comparison with the center or origin. The models for 1D and 2D are as the following:
1D 2D
In basic Mathematics there is a fundamental topic
called “Number patterns” In this it teaches to recognize and follow “trends” in a sequence. To prove the existence of the 4th Spatial Dimension you need to be able to represent a 4th Dimensional object. Hence you have to create a 4-axis model. This is where the problem arises. In the 1-axis, 2- axis and 3-axis there is a trend that is followed which is that all axes are perpendicular to the others and they are crossing through the origin. However, this is not possible for a 4-axis model. There is no place for a Fourth axis (let us call it f) which will make it at 90° to all three axes and pass through the origin as well.
To prove the existence of the 4th Spatial Dimension
you need to create a model which fulfills the following requirements Contains 4 axes Each axis is perpendicular to the other 3 Each axis passes through the origin Should such a model be created, the existence of a fourth spatial dimension can then be theoretically eligible. This means that we can conclude that the fourth dimension can`t represent matter.
Einstein says that the fourth dimension is time.
Though there isn`t any proof of this it is plausible and eligible. Even according to the above problem, it is eligible because time is abstract. Hence it`s axes doesn`t need to be perpendicular to those which represent the physical world. What I want to point out is that is Time the “Fourth” Dimension?? I believe that time comes before everything else. If Depth is the 3rd Dimension; Width is the 2nd Dimension; Length is the 1st Dimension; A point is O Dimension; Then Time should be -1 Dimension; And why not add Einstein`s Theory of Relativity? Using that there comes the -2 Dimension which is the rate of flow of time for a certain object. I myself highly doubt there is a -2 Dimension. Rather I believe that the rate of flow of time for a certain object is a property of the -1 Dimension such as perhaps it`s Gradient, but in comparison to what?? If the Big Bang theory truly is correct than I believe it should be the center of the universe, a point which is completely stationary.
Mohamed Haj Yousef - DUALITY of TIME - Complex-Time Geometry and Perpetual Creation of Space (The Single Monad Model of The Cosmos Book 2) - IBNALARABI (2018)