Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nstp-Peer-Evaluation - 3

    Uploaded by

    tristancornejo8
    4 views1 page
    The peer evaluation form evaluates 8 members of a group project on their contribution, teamwork, quality of work, initiative, and problem-solving. Most members received high scores of 5 for actively participating, collaborating well, producing high-quality work, and demonstrating initiative. However, members JohnPatric Garcia and Sueyen Lasola received lower scores of 1-2, suggesting they did not contribute or participate as much as the other members. The evaluator was Tristan Jhed G Cornejo.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    NSTP-PEER-EVALUATION - 3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The peer evaluation form evaluates 8 members of a group project on their contribution, teamwork, quality of work, initiative, and problem-solving. Most members received high scores of 5 for actively participating, collaborating well, producing high-quality work, and demonstrating initiative. However, members JohnPatric Garcia and Sueyen Lasola received lower scores of 1-2, suggesting they did not contribute or participate as much as the other members. The evaluator was Tristan Jhed G Cornejo.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Nstp-Peer-Evaluation - 3

    Uploaded by

    tristancornejo8
    The peer evaluation form evaluates 8 members of a group project on their contribution, teamwork, quality of work, initiative, and problem-solving. Most members received high scores of 5 for actively participating, collaborating well, producing high-quality work, and demonstrating initiative. However, members JohnPatric Garcia and Sueyen Lasola received lower scores of 1-2, suggesting they did not contribute or participate as much as the other members. The evaluator was Tristan Jhed G Cornejo.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    NSTP200

    PEER EVALUATION FORM

    DATE: 03-20-24
    GROUP#: 1
    TASK: Goes to maugat to discuss the project/create a poster
    EVALUATOR’S NAME: Cornejo Tristan Jhed G
    1- STRONGLY DISAGREE; 2- DISAGREE; 3- NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE; 4- AGREE; 5- STRONGLY AGREE

    CRITERIA Axcel Fionah Ivan Johnlery JohnPatric Kathleen Sueyen MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER
    Lanting Cabungc Pagara Rosales k Sone Lasola NAME NAME NAME NAME
    al Garcia
    CONTRIBUTION AND TEAMWORK

    Actively participates in 5 5 5 5 1 5 1
    discussions and
    decision-making
    Collaborates well with 5 5 5 5 1 5 1
    others
    QUALITY OF WORK
    Produces high-quality 5 5 5 5 1 5 2
    work
    Pays attention to detail 5 5 5 5 1 5 1
    and accuracy
    INITIATIVE AND PROBLEM-SOLVING

    Demonstrates initiative 5 5 5 5 1 5 1
    in solving problems and
    improving processes
    Shows creativity and 5 5 5 5 1 5 1
    resourcefulness in
    finding solutions
    TOTAL SCORE: 30 30 30 30 6 30 7

    NOTE/S:

    You might also like