Welcome to the Australian Literature Review Short Story Competition page!

Crafting a literature review can be an arduous task, demanding meticulous research, critical analysis,
and eloquent expression. It requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, the ability to
synthesize various sources, and the skill to present a coherent narrative that adds value to the existing
body of knowledge.

For many, the challenge lies in navigating through the vast ocean of literature, selecting relevant
sources, and organizing them effectively to support their argument or thesis. Moreover, ensuring that
the review is comprehensive, well-structured, and devoid of any biases adds another layer of
complexity to the process.

However, fret not! If you find yourself overwhelmed by the daunting task of writing a literature
review, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is here to assist you. Our team of experienced writers specializes in
crafting high-quality literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. With their expertise
and dedication, they can help you produce a literature review that not only meets but exceeds your
expectations.

So why struggle with the intricacies of writing a literature review when you can entrust the task to
the professionals at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔? Place your order today and take the first step towards
academic excellence!
But if no minimum is stated, you should be fine entering any length of story. Look to open access
publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. And while this is sometimes the
case, it’s the exception and not the rule. Systematic searches were conducted in 3 electronic
databases up to July 2023; PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. The basic research question
— what works? — which is usually associated with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about
this intervention that works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why. It has a
3,000 word limit, so fine for your story. Anson, Chris M., and Robert A. Schwegler. 2010. The
Longman Handbook for Writers and Readers, 6th ed. Around 45% of entries were considered for
prizes - the quality of entry was very high and it was hard to select a winner as so many of the
stories were good. Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. By
Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a
more important trend. Some are happy for you to enter your work elsewhere, like the Bristol Prize
for example, but many prefer you not to enter your work for consideration elsewhere until they have
announced their winners. Next, validity characterizes the degree to which the review process was
conducted appropriately. A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not
the sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized. Literature reviews don’t
have to be as scary as they seem. For example, I've had 2,500 word story published through a 5,000
word limit competition before. To conclude, our main objective in this chapter was to demystify the
various types of literature reviews that are central to the continuous development of the eHealth
field. I do my best to stay on top of it, but due to the amount of websites I'm dealing with, it's not
easy. What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review. I would love to
register in a competition but really don't know which category to look under. An rQES team, in
particular, cannot afford any extra time or resource requirements that might arise from either a
misunderstanding of the review question, an unclear picture of user requirements or an inappropriate
choice of methods. Systematic Review Examples This type of literature review is more structured
and rigorous than a narrative review. Consider the following issues before writing the literature
review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should
take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1. Meta-analysis This is a type
of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of several
studies. Sorry to hear about your experience with Freeditorial. The best openings offer a feeling,
atmosphere, action, or image that is gripping, and hints at more to come. BMJ disclaims all liability
and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. As you write, make sure to follow
these tips: Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and
combine them into a coherent whole. A scoping review was chosen as the most appropriate
methodology. This is exactly what I was looking for and helps a lot together with your previous post
on literature review. Should I enter my stories in one competition at a time.
And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants you to give your personal opinion on
whether or not you liked these sources. The Maggie Award is a symbol of achievement given by the
Georgia Romance Writers (GRW) to bring special attention to these authors. Anyone know if this
competition is still running and how to enter. Critical thinking As with other forms of academic
writing, your literature review needs to demonstrate good academic practice by following the Code
of Student Conduct and acknowledging the work of others through citing and referencing your
sources. I wonder if you could look up more from Canada. Thanks. Write in well-structured
paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts. The
second type of coverage consists of presenting materials that are representative of most other works
in a given field or area. Like any other chapter in your thesis or dissertation, your literature review
needs to have a clear, logical structure. Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used as educational
articles to bring practitioners up to date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ). Recently,
there have been several efforts to introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate
common pitfalls and bring changes into their publication standards. Get insider secrets to build a
compelling short story and then professional feedback from an experienced editor. Provide the
foundation for your conceptual framework (if you have one) Inform your own methodology and
research design. Create an order for your paragraph summaries (try this with just 3-4 paragraphs that
relate). Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the
literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession.
A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Subsequently, they use
fixed or random-effects analysis models to combine the results of the included studies, assess
statistical heterogeneity, and calculate a weighted average of the effect estimates from the different
studies, taking into account their sample sizes. Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an
article is relevant to your question. It offers emerging writers a great opportunity to have their work
read by published poets and authors. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the
sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made.
Among the painful TMD of muscular origin, the most frequent is myofascial pain (MP). For
example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German
economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. Dental occlusion, body posture and
temporomandibular disorders: where we are now and where we are heading for. Cook, Kathleen E.
and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?”
Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. This may include empirical
studies or conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how problems or questions
were framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important debate ( Cooper, 1988
). It’s achievable with writers who have gained a PhD themselves. A rapid QES may require strict
date and setting restrictions 17 and language restrictions that accommodate the specific requirements
of the review. All in all, 130 articles met the criteria and their data were extracted manually into a
database. This would be quite helpful if you annotate a nicely structured literature from previously
published research articles. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical
hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as
primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. Not applicable. Consent for publication
Competing interests. A literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper.
In the absence of validated risk of bias tools for qualitative studies, the team should choose a tool
according to Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group (CQIMG) guidance together
with expediency (according to ease of use, prior familiarity, etc) ( table 2, item R15). 41 In
comparison to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist which was never designed for use in
synthesis, 42 the Cochrane qualitative tool is similarly easy to use and was designed for QES use.
Thank you again for a great resource and good luck with the writing, Fionnuala. As mentioned
earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles represent powerful information sources for
eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-the-art evidence. But I think very carefully
about where I simultaneously submit. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From
the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. If you are writing the
literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research
question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. A rigorous example of one such review
in the eHealth domain is presented by Mickan, Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and Tilson (2014) on
the use of handheld computers by healthcare professionals and their impact on access to information
and clinical decision-making. These are suggestions to get you thinking and writing. Systematic
Reviews as Topic Patient Care Data availability statement No data are available. Once you’ve
decided on the organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to include in
the paper should be easy to figure out. Writing the conclusion In the conclusion, you should:
Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles to the body of knowledge under
review, maintaining the focus established in the introduction. So I think it's a fantastic idea, but I am
slightly biased:-). So the point is, to write a review one has to have a logical argument and this
logical argument should then follow through the remaining research report work that one does!
Similarly the two main objectives of a literature review are firstly the content covering existing
research, theories and evidence, and secondly your own critical evaluation and discussion of this
content. They do take a long time to put together and keep updated, but I think it's worth the effort:-
). The body section of your literature review can be organised by chronology, theme or methodology.
It also includes key references to methodological guidelines and useful sources that can be used by
eHealth scholars and researchers for planning and developing reviews. The book we use in year 9 is
Cornelsen English G21 A5A. “TB” stands for Textbook, “WB” for Workbook. Spending a lot of
time revising is a wise idea, because your main objective is to present the material, not the argument.
Therefore, this approach is very useful when your research is aimed at understanding how the topic
has unfolded over time and is often used by scholars in the field of history. Self-published work in
blogs, on social media, etc. Only studies reporting data referring to the efficacy of Acupuncture and
Laser Acupuncture group in temporomandibular disorders compared to a Placebo control group
were included in the quantitative analysis. That’s why we’ve introduced relevant additional features:
“Top Writer” (one of the top-30) and “Premium Writer” (one of the top-10). However, sometimes
you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the
organizational strategy of the body. Literature review A literature review also includes a critical
evaluation of the material; this is why it is called a literature review rather than a literature report.
The storyline and the characters are very sweet and heartwarming but I think a significant reason so
many Australians love this book is that it’s a realistic representation of what is it to live in an
Australian city. Selection Methods: Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your
literature review. You mentioned there are some with global reach but in the country secrion it's
usually UK or US and I guess I'm not elibible to enter these. You can emphasise the timeliness of the
topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature
(“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”). Non-
hodgkin Lymphoma affecting the tongue: unusual intra-oral location.