Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN THE MATTER OF
DRISHTI FOUNDATION.....................APPELLANT
Versus
UNION OF INDIVA..................................................DEFENDANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................4
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES..........................................................................................5
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION.............................................................................7
STATEMENT OF FACTS.............................................................................................9
STATEMENTS OF ISSUES........................................................................................12
ARGUMENTS...............................................................................................................13
LIST OF
ABBREVIATIONS
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
LEGISLATIONS REFERRED
CASES REFERRED
WEBSITES REFERRED
www.indiankanoon.com
www.legalserviceindia.com
www.livelaw.com
www.Blog.ipleaders.in
www.Scconline.co.in
www.Lexology.com
https://www.constitutionofindia.net/constitution_of_india/fundamental_rights/articles
www.thenewsminute.com
www.shethepeople.tv
www.lawfarm.in
www.Indiacode.nic.in
HUMAN RIGHTS
STATEMENT OF
JURISDICTION
THE APPELLANT SUBMITS THIS PIL FOR THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE
HONOURABLE COURT. THE PETITION INVOKES ITS JURISDICTION BEFORE THE
HONOURABLE SC OF INDIA UNDER ART. 32, 25 & 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IT
SET FORTHS THE FACTS, CONTENTIONS, ARGUMENTS AND THE LAWS ON WHICH THE
CLAIMS ARE BASED.
ART. 32
THE CASE WAS FILED BY THE DRISHTI FOUNDATION WHICH IS NGO WORKING
AGAINST THE EXPLOITATION OF THE RELIGIOUS FEELINGS OF THE PEOPLE BY SUCH
SO CALLED GODMAN BABARAM (“DEFENDANT”) THROUGH PIL BEFORE THE
HONOURABLE SC OF INDIA.
CAN BE DEFINED AS THE SC’S ORDERS AND DECREES BEING CARRIED OUT IN THE
EXERCISE OF ITS JURISDICTION IN SUCH A WAY THAT COMPLETE JUSTICE CAN BE
DONE. THE FEDERAL COURT HAD NO APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT ITS DECISIONS
UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT, 1935. THEREFORE, THE PETITIONER STATES
AND SUBMIT THAT THIS HONOURABLE APEX COURT, HAS THE JURISDICTION TO DEAL
AND ENTERTAIN THE PRESENT PIL.
STATEMENT OF
FACTS
DRISHTI FOUNDATION.....................APPELLANT
VS.
UNION OF INDIVA.....................DEFENDANT
1) Shivrashtra is a state in the Union of Indiva. The population of the state on the basis of religious
faith comprises of 40% Hindus, 25% Muslims, 15% Christians and the remaining 20% belong to
various smaller groups like Parsis, Tribal and Non-tribals and Non-believers. The state is
predominately a hilly area with four holy rivers flowing through it and the people are very religious
by nature. A large number of population being illiterate, carries out primitive occupations.
Religious practices, superstitions and rituals, take much of their time and money which has greatly
affected the development of the State.
2) The state is known all over the world for its religious centers. The various religious institutions in
the state are imparting only religious education putting the secular education into oblivion which
has reduced drastically the people’s employment avenues. As the state is a pilgrimage center, the
religious leaders, Gurus and Prophets of various religions in the state are vying with one another
because of huge donations offered by the pilgrims.
3) Accordingly, mass prayers, retreats, yagnas, penance services etc. are conducted very frequently.
The religious leaders, so called God men in order to continue their hold, have created a kind of fear
in the mind of their followers by way of fundamentalist practices and attitudes, which further
created divisions in the society and often within the families too.
4) The youths of the State, who were boiling with anger and frustration looking at the economic
progress of other states, often revolted against those oppressive and suppressive religious practices
that prevailed in their states. There were many protests by many groups headed by moderates,
intellectuals and non-believers on various occasions in different parts of the State.
5) Dr. Virendra Panhalkar, the 70 years old social activist, who was shot dead on 20 th August, 2020 in
one city of the State of Shivrashtra, had waged a long and lonely battle for an Anti-Superstition
Law.
6) Within a week after the vicious assassination of Dr. Panhalkar, the Governor of Shivrashtra signed
the ‘Black Magic Prohibition’ Ordinance. It came in to force from 26th August, 2020 all over the
State of Shivrashtra.
7) The ordinance is aimed at banning superstitious practices, inhuman rituals and black magic that
have been the used to exploit people in the name of religious beliefs. This law is against fraudulent
and exploitative practices, such practices have no place in an enlightened society. In the entire text
there is not a single word about God or Religion. The essential purpose of this law is to bring social
awakening and awareness in the society and to create a healthy and safe social environment with a
view to protect the common people in the society against the evil and sinister practices thriving on
ignorance.
8) The draft Bill clearly specifies 12 such practices. These includes, claiming to perform surgery with
just fingers or to change the sex of the foetus in the womb, sexual exploitation under the guise of
claims of supernatural powers, branding women as witches and causing them physical harm, human
sacrifices and other Aghori practices.
9) Inspite of coming into force of the above legislation the superstitious activities are no rise. The
people of State of Shivrashtra are being exploited by the self-declared God like Babaram
Maharaj, who has amassed huge wealth by exploiting the religious sentiments of the people. Under
the garb of religious practices he started to exploit illiterate and poor women & children and
employed youths. He uses their energies by providing them training to play with rifles and arms for
his own protection and to prevent Government authorities to take any action against him. He poses
himself as god or Supernatural power to attract women and he sexually abused many women’s too.
To ban his activities the Government of Shivrashtra tried to enter in to his Ashram but could not
succeed.
10) In the backdrop of above facts and circumstances, Drishti Foundation which is NGO working
against the exploitation of the religious feelings of the people by such so called Godman Babaram,
has filed a PIL before the Supreme Court under Art. 32 of Constitution of Indiva challenging the
activities of exploitation being carried out by the so called Baba’s in their Matths and Ashrams and
has prayed therein that all these Matths and Ashrams which are carrying out the activities of
exploiting the religious feeling of the people should be closed and all the assets acquired by these
Baba’s be confiscated and added to the national wealth of Indiva.
STATEMENT OF
ISSUES
IV. WHETHER THE BAN ON SUCH MATTHS / ASHRAMS WOULD VIOLATE THE
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE TO FOLLOW THE RELIGIOUS FAITH OF
THEIR CHOICE?
ARGUMENT
S
ISSUE I
WHETHER THE PIL IS MAINTAINABLE BEFORE THE SC OF INDIVA FOR
HEARING AND ADMISSION?
1. A PIL can be filed under Art. 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of Fundamental Right, as
guaranteed by part III of the Constitution. In the present case, there has been no violation of the
fundamental rights since, the action taken by the Baba did not affect any legal right of the people
and wanted people to protect themselves.
2. PIL means a legal action initiated in a court of law for enforcement in which the public have
some interest by which their legal rights are affected. A PIL can be filed against the State for the
violation of fundamentals rights under Art. 32 of the Constitution; therefore the present PIL is
maintainable against the Union of Indiva.
3. PIL also referred to litigation undertaken to secure public interest and demonstrates the
availability of justice to socially-disadvantaged parties and was introduced by Justice P. N.
Bhagwati. It is a relaxation on the traditional rule of locus standi. Before 1980s the judiciary and
the SC of India entertained litigation only from parties affected directly or indirectly by the
defendant. It heard and decided cases only under its original and appellate jurisdictions.
However, the SC began permitting cases on the grounds of PIL, which means that even people
who are not directly involved in the case may bring matters of public interest to the court. It is
the court's privilege to entertain the application for the PIL.
4. The petition claimed by the petitioner is not maintainable in the court of law. The Honourable
Judge of the SC of India does not have inherent jurisdiction to try, and entertain the present case
by virtue of its writ jurisdiction; the petitioner has filed the PIL before the Honourable SC of
India, in the matter under Art. 32, Art. 25-28 and Art. 21 of Constitution of India.
5. It respectably and humbly contends that Baba is not guilty for committing the offence of
insulting religious belief under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code.
6. According to Article 21:- “Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: No person shall be deprived
of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” This
fundamental right is available to every person, citizens and foreigners alike Art. 21 provides two
rights Right to life and Right to personal liberty.
7. Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides
that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and to the other provisions of
this part, are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and have the right to freely profess,
practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect the operation
of any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to the regulation
or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with
religious practice. Providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu
religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus.
8. Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious
denomination or any section of the such religious denomination of establishing and maintaining
institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion,
owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable), administering the property in
accordance with the law.
9. Article 27 of the Constitution prevents a person from being compelled to pay any taxes which
are meant for the payment of the costs incurred for the promotion or maintenance of any religion
or religious denomination.
10. Article 28 prohibits providing religious instructions in any educational institutions that are
maintained wholly out of the state funds. The above shall not apply to those educational
institutions administered by the states but established under endowment or trust requiring
religious instruction to be imparted in such institution. Any person attending state recognized or
state-funded educational institution is not required to take part in religious instruction or attend
11. Maths and Ashram follow the tradition and religious belief as per the culture of Shivrashtra
which are according to Art. 25-28, the Fundamental Rights given by the Constitution of India.
The list of Maths and Ashrams are prepared by the Drishti Foundations on their own which can
be animus against this Maths and Ashrams.
12. The interest of public is not harmed by the baba of Shivrashtra, a state that is known all over the
world for its religious centers. Accordingly, mass prayers, retreats, yagnas, penance services etc.
are conducted very frequently for imparting religious education.
ISSUE II
No, the Activities exploiting the religious sentiments of the people does amount to infringement of
fundamental rights of the people as per Art. 25 to 28 of the Constitution of India.
Art. 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all
persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions:
This means that all Indian citizens are entitled to the aforementioned rights provided that these do not
contradict a public order, morality, health and other provisions.
It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from
making any law relating to:
Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated
with religious practice.
Providing social welfare and reform.
Opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the
Hindus.
This means that the state can either condition the working of existing law(s) or make new law(s) so as to
regulate and restrict financial, political, economical, or other secular activities associated with faiths. It
further facilitates social welfare and reform or opening of Hindu religious institutions of a public
character that is open to all sections and classes of Hindus.
In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali the Bombay High Court held that Art. 25 and 26 not only prevents
doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees
ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is
the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices
that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them.
WHAT IS RELIGION?
The German philosopher Immanuel Kant defines religion as “Religion is the recognition of all our
duties as divine commands”.
Milton Yinger, American sociologist defines religion as “a system of beliefs and practices by means of
which a group of people struggles with the ultimate problems of human life”.
The constitution does not define the term ‘religion’ and ‘matters of religion’. Hence, it is left to the SC
to determine the judicial meaning of these terms.
Art. 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or
any section of such religious denomination of:
Art. 28 prohibits:
Providing religious instructions in any educational institutions that are maintained wholly out of
the state funds.
The above shall not apply to those educational institutions administered by the states but
established under endowment or trust requiring religious instruction to be imparted in such
institution.
Any person attending state recognized or state-funded educational institution is not required to
take part in religious instruction or attend any workshop conducted in such an institution or
premises of such educational institution.
In this case, Justice Hansaria observed that “our constitution makers had used the word “religion” in
these two art. (Art. 25 and 26) in the sense conveyed by the word ‘dharma’.” He further explained
the difference between religion and dharma as religion is enriched by visionary methodology and
theology, whereas dharma blooms in the realm of direct experience. Religion contributes to the
changing phases of a culture; dharma enhances the beauty of spirituality. Religion may inspire one to
build a fragile, mortal home for God; dharma helps one to recognize the immortal shrine in the heart.
Article 25 to Article 28 of the Indian Constitution puts forth the right to freedom of religion. Article
25(1) guarantees to every person the ‘freedom of conscience’ and the right to profess, practice and
propagate any religion of one’s choice in compliance to ‘public order, morality and health.’ The term
‘conscience’ highlights the celestial and spiritual part of the religion that is much ahead of the State’s
control.
People are free to choose their own religion, even as it lashed out at a “very, very harmful kind” of
“public interest” petition claiming there is mass religious conversion happening “by hook or by
crook” across the country.
ISSUE
III
1. Secularism means developing, understanding and respect for different religions. It is believed that
the word ‘Secularism’ has its origin in late medieval Europe. In 1948, during the constituent
assembly debate, a demand was made by the KT Shah to include the word ‘Secular’ in the
Preamble to the Constitution.
2. The members of the assembly though agreed to the secular nature of the constitution but it was not
incorporated in the Preamble. Later, in 1976 the Indira Gandhi government enacted the 42nd
Amendment Act and the word ‘Secular’ was added to the Preamble. The 42nd Amendment Act
also known as the ‘Mini Constitution’, is the most comprehensive amendment to the Constitution.
3. In the much-disputed Ayodhya case, it was held by the apex court that the constitution postulates
equality of all faiths. Through Tolerance and mutual co-existence, the secular commitment of our
country and its people can be nourished.
4. Secularism as contemplated by the Constitution of India has the following distinguishing features:
The state will not identify itself with aor be controlled by any religion;
While the state guarantees to everyone the right to profess whatever religion one chooses to
follow, it will not accord any preferential treatment to any of them.
No discrimination will be shown by the state against any person on account of his religion or
faith.
The right of every citizen, subject to any general condition, to enter any offices under the state
and religious tolerance form the heart and soul of secularism as envisaged by the constitution.
It secures the conditions of creating a fraternity of the Indian people which assures both the
dignity of the individual and the unity of the nation.
5. Secularism seeks to defend the absolute freedom of religious and other belief, and protect the right
6. Various religious institutions in the state are imparting only religious education putting the secular
education into oblivion which has reduced drastically the people’s employment avenues.
The 9-judge bench, in this case, ruled that Secularism is the basic feature of the Constitution of India. It
also observed that religion and politics cannot be mixed together. If the State follows unsecular policies
or courses of action then it acts contrary to the constitutional mandate. In a State, all are equal and
should be treated equally. Religion has no place in the matters of State. Freedom of religion as a
fundamental right is guaranteed to all persons in India but from the point of view of the State, religion,
faith, and belief are immaterial.
The faith that one instils in their religion often becomes the reason for conflict with others. The aspect of
supernatural powers and forces governing religions most of the time drives all the believers towards
opposing sciences and logic. What one’s religion allows other religions might not, this is where the
conflict arises.
In a certain context even if an idea or principle has not been promoted by religion, people at a higher
authority in terms of religion and the so-called holy learned leaders interpret and propagate such
meanings that are completely against humanity, morality and against the rights of other human beings.
Nobody stands against upholding the concept of following religious duties, it is rather promoted and the
support for such ideals eventually gives rise to mass movements and mob violence. Time and again
India has seen religion and freedom of religion being used as a means to acquire monetary gains,
commit crimes, obtain political fame and retaining the position of power and gaining everyone’s
support.
ISSUE
IV
Yes, ban on such Maths/Ashrams would violate the fundamental rights of the people to follow the
religious faith and discourage them to worship god, visit temples or masjid. It will lead to people losing
faith in god.
Art. 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all
persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions:
This means that all Indian citizens are entitled to the aforementioned rights provided that these do not
contradict a public order, morality, health and other provisions.
It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from
making any law relating to:
Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated
with religious practice.
Providing social welfare and reform.
Opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the
Hindus.
This means that the state can either condition the working of existing law(s) or make new law(s) so as to
regulate and restrict financial, political, economical, or other secular activities associated with faiths. It
further facilitates social welfare and reform or opening of Hindu religious institutions of a public
character that is open to all sections and classes of Hindus.
Bans on Maths/Ashram does lose faith in religion and in God. Fundamental rights are subject to certain
conditions which the Baba in the present case has not violated and it is the choice of people that they
profess the teaching of the Baba. The Constitution of India provides the people of India to profess and
practice religion which they chose to practice. The people of India who are following the baba have not
made a single complaint of fraud, mis-representation, inducement and other kinds of allegations.
Therefore, the people of India are following the Baba with their own consent and conscience therefore to
ban ashrams would be an extreme step directly resulting on violating of fundamental rights of the people
of India.
The people of Shivrashtra, a state which is known all over the world for its religious centers, have not
raised a complaint or objection towards the action taken by the Baba. It is prejudice to ban the
Maths/Ashrams based on a superstition that all Baba’s are corrupt and have violated the sentiments of
the people.
ISSUE V
Art. 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or
any section of such religious denomination of:
The word ‘religious denomination’ is not defined in the constitution. The word ‘denomination’ came to
be considered by the SC in the case of Commissioner, Hindu Religious endowment Madras v. Shri
Laxmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shri Shirur Mutt. In this case, the meaning of ‘Denomination’ was culled
out from the Oxford dictionary, “A collection of individuals classed together under the same name, a
religious sect or body having a common faith and organization designated by a distinctive name”.
Art. 26 does not deal with the right of an individual but is confined to a religious denomination. The Art.
refers to a denomination of any religion, whether it is a majority or a minority religion, just as Art. 25
refers to all persons, whether they belong to the majority or a minority religion.
Art. 26 (d) says that a religious denomination has the right to administer its own property but it should
be in accordance with Law. In Durgah Committee Ajmer v. Syed Hussain Ali the Supreme Court
observed that if the religious denomination never had the right to administer property or if it has lost its
right then such right cannot be created under Art. 26 and therefore cannot be invoked.
Fundamental rights are there for the protection of one’s right to practice religion but no right can exist in
absolute independence without any condition. Same way Art. 25 of the constitution which calls for one’s
rights to freedom of religion but it is subject to public order.
The Baba’s have the right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes; to
manage its own affairs in matters of religion; to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
to administer such property in accordance with law. The people of this state have no objection towards
the same and have not claimed that their rights have been infringed or violated by the act of the Baba.
Matter of religion includes religious practices, rituals, observances, ceremonies, mode and manner of
worship, etc., regarded as the essential and integral part of the religion. For instance, in Acharaj Singh v.
State of Bihar it was held that, if Bhog offered to the deity is a well-established practice of that religious
institution, such a practice should be regarded as a part of that religion.
Similarly, the Baba has tried to create a healthy and safe social environment with a view to protect the
common people in the society against the evil and sinister practices thriving on ignorance. He trained
poor woman and children to play with rifles and arms so that they can protect themselves from evil.
Baba’s have the right to manage their own affairs if the public is devotee and not objecting towards the
same.
ISSUE
VI
No, it is not necessary to deal sternly with such baba’s who are helping the innocent public against
exploitation and educating people and making them brave. They tend to bring social awakening and
awareness in the society.
Amendments are necessary but for the betterment of the people and not to disgrace Baba’s who at times
are falsely disguised by the public as bad or corrupt. People to provoke such Baba’s have filed false case
against them which have been not proven guilty against those Baba’s.
The learned counsel submits that the Act violates Art. 26(c) of the Constitution which offers to every
religious denomination the fundamental right "to own and acquire movable and immovable property"
subject only to "public order, morality and health". He submits that the Act aims at agrarian reform but
is not concerned with "public order, morality and health". Since it deprives religious denominations of
their ownership of property, it transgresses Article 26(c) and is invalid. He also draws our attention to
Article 25(1) which has subjected the rights therein not only to public order, morality and health, but
also to "the other provisions of Part III". Ho, therefore, submits that the right guaranteed under Article
26(c) is Rot subject to "the other pro visions of Part III" and therefore, there cart be no acquisition of
property under Article 31 of the Constitution
CONCLUSION
Although religion empowers India and gives millions the hope to live and strive for success and a better
life, it also provides a scope of deception, violence and hypocrisy. Time and again religion has been
used by several as a medium to achieve a powerful position in the society, humiliate others and suppress
Several times inhuman activities and discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, colour, gender is
acquitted by religion as it is proclaimed to be a duty given by God to man. Religion is taken and twisted
by humans which leads others towards the illusion. Freedom of Religion gives everyone the right to
practice, profess and propagate the religions of their choice, belief and faith but there has to be a more
severe and rigid boundary of its limitations. Sometimes one individual accessing their freedom of
religion violates and infringes the rights of others which in turn leads to a conflict that goes against
Inhumanity and crimes committed in the name of religious freedom have to be stopped as well.
Religious freedom can never do away with the concept of behaving and acting in a humane manner. It
can never go against the strength and harmony of the country. The State needs to step in more frequently
and prevent the abuse of power. Strict legal action against people responsible for inflicting violence
against minorities has to be taken. Political parties based on caste and religion should be prohibited, and
The state should be more responsible for publicly condemning religious violence and should take more
efforts to look into reports of harassment and assault during communal violence for securing justice.
PRAYER
In the light of the arguments presented, cases referred and authorities cited, the counsel for the Appellant
2. The PIL filed under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India before the SC is not maintainable;
3. The practice of activities by Baba’s which were supported by the Math’s and Ashram does not
violate the Art. 21, 32 and Art. 25-28;
4. Discharge the charges of Sec 295A against the accused Godman Babaram since he is only
following religious activities according to Constitution.
5. That the defendant has not violated the fundamental rights of the indigenous people and has not
caused religious degradation;
6. Not to ban Math’s/Ashram as it neither harms the religious feelings of the people nor affects the
Fundamental Rights of the citizens; and/or
7. Pass any other order, other order that it deems fit in the interest of Justice, Equity and Good
Conscience.
For This Act of Kindness, the Defendant Shall be Duty Bound Forever Pray.
Place:
Date: --/--/--