1

Addressing a major challenge facing contemporary corrections in the United States

Dion Nicholson

The University of Baltimore

CRJU 341 (Correctional Perspectives)

Jeffrey Ian Ross, Ph.D.

December 10, 2013

 2

Abstract

Mass incarceration, the unprecedented increase in prisons and jails over the past few decades, is

a significant challenge facing contemporary corrections in the United States. Mass incarceration

stands as a significant challenge confronting corrections in the United States, posing multifaceted

problems. Persistent for decades, this issue results from tough-on-crime policies, mandatory

sentencing, and disparities in the criminal justice system. Root causes include the War on Drugs,

three-strike laws, and socio-economic factors contributing to a disproportionate impact on

marginalized communities. Proposed solutions encompass sentencing reform, diversion

programs, and increased focus on rehabilitation, yet progress remains slow. Political resistance,

vested interests, and a societal preference for punitive measures have hindered the effectiveness

of these solutions. Addressing mass incarceration demands a comprehensive reevaluation of

policies, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment, and tackling systemic issues contributing

to over-reliance on incarceration in the U.S. criminal justice system.

 3

Addressing a major challenge facing contemporary corrections in the United States

In the landscape of contemporary corrections in the United States, the specter of mass

incarceration looms large, posing a formidable challenge. The nation's criminal justice system,

while striving for public safety, has inadvertently led to a staggering rise in the number of

individuals incarcerated, creating a complex web of social, economic, and ethical dilemmas.

With approximately 2.3 million people behind bars, the U.S. boasts the highest incarceration rate

globally, igniting fervent debates about its efficacy and fairness (Vogel, 1970). This issue

transcends mere statistics, unraveling profound issues of racial disparity, socioeconomic

inequality, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies. The impact of mass incarceration

resonates deeply within communities, fracturing families and perpetuating cycles of poverty and

crime. As society grapples with the multifaceted repercussions, addressing the root causes and

redefining approaches within the correctional system becomes imperative for fostering a more

just and equitable society (Loury & Western, 2010).

Mass incarceration stands as a monumental challenge within the realm of corrections in

the United States due to its multifaceted impact on society. The sheer number of individuals

confined within the system strains resources, and overcrowded facilities, and limits the capacity

for effective rehabilitation. This influx of inmates also magnifies issues of violence, mental

health concerns, and the spread of infectious diseases within correctional institutions. Moreover,

the disproportionate incarceration rates among marginalized communities, particularly people of

color, underscore systemic biases and inequalities inherent in the justice system. The financial

burden of sustaining such vast incarceration rates diverts resources that could otherwise be

allocated to crime prevention, education, and community support programs. Rectifying this

challenge requires a holistic approach that addresses root causes, prioritizes alternatives to
 4

incarceration, focuses on rehabilitation, and aims to reduce recidivism while fostering a fairer,

more equitable criminal justice system (Blankenship et al., 2018).

Mass incarceration in the United States manifests as a major problem for several

interconnected reasons. Firstly, the sheer scale of incarceration, with approximately 2.3 million

people behind bars, strains resources, and finances, and perpetuates a cycle of incarceration that

is economically unsustainable (Vogel, 1970). This excessive imprisonment places immense

pressure on correctional facilities, leading to overcrowding, limited access to adequate

healthcare, and increased violence within prisons.

Secondly, mass incarceration exacerbates societal inequalities. There's a disproportionate

impact on communities of color, where systemic biases in law enforcement, sentencing, and

access to legal representation result in higher incarceration rates. This perpetuates cycles of

poverty, as those imprisoned often face challenges reintegrating into society upon release,

hindering employment opportunities and social reintegration. The system's emphasis on punitive

measures over rehabilitation overlooks mental health, addiction, and socioeconomic factors

contributing to criminal behavior, perpetuating societal issues rather than addressing preventive

measures or alternative justice (Blankenship et al., 2018).

Mass incarceration as a pervasive issue in the United States has roots stretching back

several decades, but its rapid escalation gained momentum from the late 20th century. Policies

like mandatory minimum sentencing, the war on drugs, and "tough on crime" initiatives from the

1970s through the 1990s significantly contributed to the exponential growth of the incarcerated

population. The 1980s saw a shift towards harsh sentencing laws for drug-related offenses,

disproportionately affecting communities of color. This led to a rise in prison populations and a

significant increase in incarceration. The latter half of the 20th century saw a pronounced rise in
 5

prison populations, overcrowded facilities, and systemic biases within the justice system,

solidifying mass incarceration as a significant challenge in contemporary American corrections

(Vogel, 1970).

Mass incarceration in the United States stems from a confluence of systemic factors.

Policy decisions, including mandatory minimum sentencing laws and the war on drugs, fueled a

punitive approach to crime, leading to longer sentences and higher incarceration rates,

particularly for nonviolent offenses. The socio-economic disparities and systemic biases within

the justice system amplify the problem, with marginalized communities, especially people of

color, bearing the brunt of harsher sentencing and disproportionate incarceration rates due to

racial profiling and unequal access to legal resources. The US's mass incarceration problem is a

result of a combination of legislation, social inequality, biases, and profit-driven motives, which

include a lack of emphasis on rehabilitation and reintegration programs, and the privatization of

prisons (Gottschalk, 2011).

Various solutions have been proposed to address the multifaceted challenge of mass

incarceration in the United States. These include sentencing law reforms, such as reducing or

eliminating mandatory minimums for nonviolent offenses, granting judges more discretion in

sentencing, and revising three-strike laws to focus on violent crimes (Pettit & Gutierrez, 2018).

Efforts to tackle racial disparities in the justice system involve implicit bias training for

law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges, along with initiatives to ensure equitable access to

legal representation. The focus is on diversion programs, reforms in the bail system,

rehabilitation and reintegration programs, and community-based alternatives to incarceration.

These strategies aim to address underlying issues, reduce pretrial detention, and promote

restorative justice practices like mediation and community service. They aim to create a fairer,
 6

more rehabilitative justice system while addressing systemic issues contributing to mass

incarceration (C. Loury & Western, 2018).

The implementation of solutions to tackle mass incarceration in the United States has

encountered several challenges, hindering their effectiveness. Political resistance often impedes

meaningful legislative changes, with tough-on-crime rhetoric historically prevailing over efforts

to reform sentencing laws or reduce incarceration rates. Additionally, the entrenched economic

interests of the private prison industry create a disincentive for reducing inmate populations,

perpetuating a profit-driven motive for maintaining high incarceration rates (Gottschalk, 2011).

Systemic barriers like racism and unequal access to resources hinder efforts to address

disproportionate incarceration rates in marginalized communities. Limited funding and

inconsistent rehabilitation programs undermine their impact. A holistic approach at the federal

and state levels is needed to address mass incarceration, requiring a shift in policy, societal

attitudes, and resource allocation (Drucker, 2019).

Mass incarceration stands as a monumental challenge within contemporary corrections,

plaguing the United States with overcrowded facilities, systemic biases, and societal fractures.

Tackling this issue demands a comprehensive overhaul reforming sentencing laws, addressing

institutional biases, investing in rehabilitation, and prioritizing community-based solutions.

Resolving mass incarceration necessitates a concerted effort to build a fairer, more equitable

justice system that prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment, aiming to heal communities and

break the cycle of incarceration.

 7

Reference

Blankenship, K. M., del Rio Gonzalez, A. M., Keene, D. E., Groves, A. K., & Rosenberg, A. P. (2018).

Mass incarceration, race inequality, and Health: Expanding Concepts and assessing impacts on

well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 215, 45–52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.042

C. Loury, G., & Western, B. (2018, December 13). The challenge of mass incarceration in America.

American Academy of Arts & Sciences. https://www.amacad.org/project/challenge-mass-

incarceration-america

Drucker, E. (2019, July 29). Mass incarceration in the United States: From punishment to public health.

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.453

Gottschalk, M. (2011). The past, present, and future of mass incarceration in the United States.

Criminology & Public Policy, 10(3), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-

9133.2011.00755.x

Loury, G. C., & Western, B. (2010). Introduction: The challenge of mass incarceration in America.

Daedalus, 139(3), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_e_00018

Pettit, B., & Gutierrez, C. (2018). Mass incarceration and racial inequality. The American Journal of

Economics and Sociology, 77(3–4), 1153–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12241

Vogel, C. (1970, January 1). An end to mass incarceration: Crown Family School of Social Work, policy,

and Practice. An End to Mass Incarceration | Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and

Practice. https://crownschool.uchicago.edu/ssa_magazine/end-mass-

incarceration.html#:~:text=The%20era%20of%20mass%20incarceration,times%20more%20than

%20in%20Japan.