You are on page 1of 10

Crack Mitigation in Crack Mitigation Schemes

Post-Tensioned Floors

™This presentation covers the


practical measures followed in North
America to allow for shortening of
post-tensioned slabs and avoid
excessive cracking

™The objective of crack mitigation


schemes is to allow shortening of a
post-tensioned floor to an amount
that would ensure the design-
intended contribution of post-
Dr Bijan O Aalami tensioning to the strength of the floor
Professor Emeritus,
San Francisco State University
Principal, ADAPT Corporation; bijan@adaptsoft.com
www.adaptsoft.com

P1179 copyright 2016 PT-Structures.com

Crack Mitigation Schemes Crack Mitigation Schemes

™ Post-tensioned floors shorten


Adverse effects of support restraints is
™ Shortening is necessary for full contribution pronounced in the following instances:
of post-tensioning
¾ Subterranean floors with restraining
™ For common residential and commercial perimeter walls
floor slabs, the anticipated floor shortening is
approximately 10 mm for every 15 m slab ¾ First level of elevated floors supported
length; (0.75 in. for every 100 ft slab length) on stiff walls and columns

™ Where slab supports restrain shortening, ¾ To a lesser extend the second and
shrinkage of concrete results in cracking. possibly third elevated floors
¾ Addition of rebar disperses cracks and
reduces crack width, but does not
compensate for loss in contribution from
post-tensioning.
Crack Mitigation Schemes Crack Mitigation Schemes

™In detailing for crack mitigation, it is


often necessary to also estimate the
™Generally, upper floors of a building
short-term shortening of a slab
are not subject to support restraint to
the extent that it would compromise
™Short-term shortening can be
the strength of the floor slab
estimated from the following graph
™In most cases, crack mitigation for
upper levels is not required and not
practiced.

Characteristics of Restraint Cracks Characteristics of Restraint Cracks

™ Restraint cracks are long ™ Restraint cracks are long, deep and few
™ Do not necessarily occur at locations of ™ Plastic shrinkage cracks are shallow on
maximum moment surface, many and irregular
™ Occur where axial strength is least, such
as where bars terminate
Shallow plastic
™ Generally extend through the depth of slab shrinkage cracks
(through cracks)

Long deep
restrain cracks

Restraint crack Strength crack


Characteristics of Restraint Cracks Characteristics of Restraint Cracks

™ Cracks at discontinuities are not necessarily


related to the restraint of supports
™ Cracks at discontinuities do not have the
same adverse effect on safety of the floor as
™ Restraint cracks generally extend through the cracks from restraint of supports
depth of the member
™ In the above first level post-tensioned floors
on perimeter walls the restraint cracks have
fully interrupted the precompression

Characteristics of Restraint Cracks Characteristics of Restraint Cracks

Crack formation resulting from


lack of strength

Trim bars at joint Crack formation at joint

™ Example of discontinuity cracks at re-entrant RC slab Unboned PT slab


corner of a post-tensioned ground-supported
slab.
™ RC slabs develop numerous short and thin
™ Addition of rebar at discontinuity has been cracks
partially successful
™ Slabs with unbonded tendons develop single
long and wide cracks
Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

1 - Favorable arrangement of walls


1 – Favorable layout of restraining supports allow the slab parts to move toward
the point of zero movement
2 – Structural separation breaking up the
floor slab

3 – Delay (closure) strips; joints; favorable


pour sequence

4 –Temporary release between the


restraining supports and floor slab

5 - Permanent released connections


between the restraining supports floor
slab

Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

2 – Structural separation
2 – Structural separation

For floor slabs on stiff supports, such as


subterranean and first elevated
Separation allowing
™Unless special provisions are made, limit horizontal
the length of contiguous post-tensioned movement only
slabs to 375 ft (115 m). For slabs longer
than 375 ft (115 m), provide a structural
separation

™For slabs longer than 250 ft (76 m), but


not exceeding 375 ft (114 m), provide a
central delay strip Separation
allowing
™For slabs shorter than 250 ft (76 m), movement in all
design the slab for the anticipated directions
shortening
Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

2 – Structural separation 3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence

™ Delay strips are bands of about 3 ft (1


m) wide that subdivide a larger slab
area into isolated segments.

™ Segments on each side of the strip are


cast and allowed to shorten, before the
gap is closed

™ Reinforcement does not continue from


concrete on one side of the strip to the
other

™ Overlapping reinforcement from the


sides to the delay strip provides the
continuity

At lower levels between movement-unfavorable


slab segments

Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence 3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence

Concrete cast
on one side

Concrete cast on
both sides

Delay strip in
podium slab
Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence


3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence

Delay strip

™ View of interrupted tendons at a delay


strip of an analysis model

™ Equal spans: position strip at ¼ point


™ Anchor tendon at centroid

Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence 3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence

™ Unequal spans: position strip at mid- ™ Typically, delay strips are required for the
depth first and possibly second and third
™ Anchor tendon at centroid elevated slabs
™ Prop both sides ™ It is not generally necessary to continue
them to upper levels
Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence 3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence

™ Typical detail example from construction


drawings ™ Construction joints allow time for one side
to shorten, before the second side is cast
™ The v-grooves are intended to hide ™ For long pours, tendons are stressed at
anticipated cracks the joint

Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence 3 – Delay strips; joints; pour sequence

Without intermediate With intermediate With intermediate


stressing stressing
Construction joints of bonded tendons
with intermediate stressing is done
either using special couplers, or
overlapping tendons

With intermediate stressing; finished


on one side
Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

4 – Temporary release 4 – Temporary release

™ A bond breaker is placed over the wall

™ After slab has undergone the design-intended


shortening, the fill in the corrugated tube is
removed and the void is filled with strong epoxy ™ A bond breaker is placed over the wall
™ After slab has undergone the design-intended
shortening, the fill in the corrugated tube is
removed and the void is filled with strong epoxy
™ The dowels through the tube extend to the wall
above

Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

4 – Temporary release 5 – Permanent release

™ The stubby column supporting a long-massive


post-tensioned exhibition roof is initially
supported on Neoprene pads to allow it slide
over the foundation.

™ Column is welded to the base, once the ™ Permanent release is practical, where shear
anticipated shortening of the post-tensioned transfer between the slab and its support is not
roof has taken place required
Crack Mitigation Options Crack Mitigation Options

5 – Permanent release Other release options

™ In both options above, the supporting wall is


covered with a bond breaker Tendons are stressed
alternatively from each
™ On the left detail, the dowel from the wall side between
terminates within the compressible cover. constructed retaining
walls
™ On the right, the dowel is bent into the slab and
engages in extreme events

Crack Mitigation Options - Detailing Crack Mitigation Options - Detailing

A . Favorable arrangement of tendons A . Favorable arrangement of tendons

Terminated tendons
deposit precompression
past the shear walls

Terminated tendons
™ Arrangement of tendons around opening deposit improve
distribution of
precompression
Crack Mitigation
Crack Mitigation Options - Detailing
Post-Tensioned Floors
B . Addition of rebar Summary
™ Post-tensioned slabs shorten
™ Slabs can crack, if shortening is restrained
™ Cracks caused by restraint of support impair
the design-intended function of post-tensioning

™ Common schemes for crack mitigation of slabs


are:
¾ Favorable arrangement of restraining
supports
¾ Structural separation (first couple of levels)
¾ Delay strips (first couple of levels)
¾ Joints; with or without intermediate
stressing
¾ Releases: temporary; permanent
™ Small diameter rebar next to restraining
¾ Favorable arrangement of tendons
elements disperses cracks and reduces crack
¾ Addition of rebar to disperse cracks
width
™ This does not compensate for loss from
contribution of prestressing to strength of the
slab

Thank you for listening

any questions?

You might also like