Avbwb MVJZVGVWG 2023

AvBwb mvjZvgvwg 2023
2023 mv‡ji ¸iæZ¡c~Y© AvBb Ges evsjv‡`k mycªxg ‡KvU© (Avcxj wefvM I
nvB‡KvU© wefvM) KZ©…K cª`Ë Av‡jvwPZ ivqmg~‡ni msw¶ß ch©v‡jvPbv
08 †deªæqvwi, 2024
gyLeÜ
‰`bw›`b NUbvcªev‡n AvB‡bi cÖ‡qvM GKwU Pjgvb cÖwµqv| cwieZ©bkxj we‡k^ hy‡Mi Pvwn`v Ges
ivóª I RbM‡Yi e„nËi Kj¨vY we‡ePbvq bZzb bZzb AvBb cÖYxZ nq| †Kvb NUbvi wePvi Kivi
Rb¨ cÖ‡qvRb nq AvB‡bi mwVK e¨vL¨v I we‡kølY| wePviK I AvBbRxex‡ì m„Rbkxj wPšÍv -
fvebvi cÖ‡qvMB AvB‡bi weavb‡K RxešÍ K‡i †Zv‡j| m„wó nq bwRi| hv AvBbRxexiv I Aat¯Íb
Av`vj‡Zi wePviKiv AbymiY K‡i| Gfv‡eB bwRimg~n fwel¨r cÖR‡b¥i Rb¨ AvB‡bi kvmb
cÖwZôvq f‚wgKv iv‡L| Avgiv 2023 mv‡j RvZxq msm` KZ…©K cÖYxZ AvBbmg~n Ges evsjv‡`k
mycÖxg †Kv‡U©i I‡qemvBU I wewfbœ jÕ wi‡cv‡U© cÖKvwkZ bwRimg~n ch©v‡jvPbv K‡iwQ| D³
ch©v‡jvPbvi Av‡jv‡K wbe©vwPZ AvBb I bwRimg~‡ni msKjb ÓAvBwb mvjZvgvwg-2023Ó
Avcbv‡ì mvg‡b Dc¯’vcb KiwQ|
Avkv Kwi Avgv‡ì G ÿz`ª cÖqv‡m AvB‡bi wkÿK, QvÎ, AvBbRxex, wePviK I AvBb m‡PZb
bvMwiKiv DcK…Z n‡eb| Avgiv fzj-åvwšÍi D‡×© bB| Avcbv‡ì civgk© Avgv‡ì Pjvi c‡_i
cv‡_q|
mK‡ji mn‡hvwMZv GKvšÍ Kvg¨|
(‡gvnv¤§` wkwki gwbi)

‡nW Ae †P¤^vm©
jÕ j¨ve
A¨vW‡fv‡KU, evsjv‡`k mycÖxg ‡KvU©|
1
m~PxcÎ
1. f‚wg Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I cÖwZKvi AvBb 2023 .......................................................................... 4
2. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023 ......................................................................................... 5
Avcxj wefvM
1. g„Mv¼v ‡gvnb Xvjx Ges Ab¨vb¨ ebvg wPËiÄb gÐj Ges Ab¨vb¨ 18 SCOB [2023] AD 20 ............. 12
2. evsjv‡`k ebvg ‡mwjg Lvb 18 SCOB [2023] AD 36 ........................................................ 14
3. evsjv‡`k ebwkí Dbœqb K‡c©v‡ikb I Ab¨vb¨ ebvg AvBqye Avjx I Ab¨vb¨ [28 weGjwm (GwW) 317] ...... 16
4. cªevmx Kj¨vY e¨vsK ebvg ‡gvt eRjyi ikx` I Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 145] .............................. 16
5. Uv½vBj ‡K›`ªxq mgevq e¨vsK wjwg‡U‡Wi c‡ÿ mfvcwZ KzìZ-B-Gjvnx (‡gvt) ebvg iv‡njv RvwKi I
Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 57] ................................................................................................ 18
6. AMªYx e¨vsK wjwg‡UW ebvg ‡gvt nvwbd ‡kL I Ab¨vb¨ [28 weGjwm (GwW) 68] ................................ 19
7. Avbmvi I wfwWwci gnvcwiPvjK I Ab¨vb¨ ebvg ‡gvt iæûj Avwgb I Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 131] ... 20
8. mv¾v` ‡nv‡mb ebvg ‡gvt jyrdzj nvmvb I Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 321]................................... 21
9. Avkivdyj nK (‡gvt) ebvg ‡Pqvig¨vb, `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb I Ab¨vb¨‡ì [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 7] .......... 23
10. nvwmbv Av³vi ebvg Av‡gbv ‡eMg [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 68] ...................................................... 23
11. ‡Zive Avjx ebvg ‰mq` Djøvn [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 233] ......................................................... 25
12. ivóª ebvg G GBP Gg dzqv` [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 241] ............................................................. 27
13. evsjv‡`k weÁvb I wkí M‡elYv cwil` (wewmGmAvBAvi) Gi ‡Pqvig¨vb ebvg wR Avi Gg Av¯ÍvK ‡gvnvj Lvb
Ges Ab¨vb¨ [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 210] ........................................................................................ 29
14. ivóª ebvg AwgZ nvmvb [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 113] ................................................................... 30
15. evsjv‡`k ebvg Ave`yjøvn dviæK [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 139]....................................................... 31
nvB‡KvU© wefvM ..................................................................................................................... 33
nvB‡KvU© wefvM
1. Aveyj Kv‡kg Ges Ab¨ ebvg AvkdvK Avn‡g` Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 93] ............. 33
2. ‡gv: kvwnb BKevj ebvg †Rbv‡ij mvwU©wd‡KU Awdmvi Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 168] .. 35
3. wmwfj wewea ‡idv‡iÝ bs 11/2022 [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 8] ........................................... 37
4. wmivRyj nK nvIjv`vi Ges Ab¨ ebvg Ry‡jLv †eMg Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 199] ..... 39
5. ivóª ebvg `zb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 40] ................................................ 40
6. BDwbwjfvi evsjv‡`k wjwg‡UW ebvg †Pqvg¨vb, RvZxq ivR¯^ ‡evW© [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 137
(Custom Matter)] ............................................................................................................ 41
7. ‡gv: ‡gvwgbyj Bmjvg ebvg evsjv‡`k Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 108 (Service Matter)]
43
8. PÆMªvg WªvB WK wjwg‡UW ebvg Gg.wU. dRj-B-ivweŸ Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 82
(Custom Matter)] ............................................................................................................ 45
2
9. ‡gv: Rwniæj nK ebvg RR, A_© FY Av`vjZ, PÆMÖvg Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 20 (Artha
Rin Matter)] .................................................................................................................... 47
10. cÖ‡dmi †gvnv¤§` BDbym ebvg ivóª [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 162] ......................................... 48
11. mvwgqv ingvb ebvg evsjv‡`k Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 82 (Service Matter)] ....... 51
12. ‡gvnv‡¤§` dviæK-Dj-AvRg ebvg wbe©vPb Kwgkb [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 01 (Custom Matter)]
54
13. PÆMÖvg e›ì KZ©…c¶ ebvg †gv: †g‡nw` nvmvb [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 34] .............................. 56
14. weM em K‡c©v‡ikb wjwg‡UW ebvg Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi U«v÷ [17 SCOB [2023] HCD 57 (Arbitration
act, 2001)] ....................................................................................................................... 57
15. cÖwei Kzgvi ‡` @ mvBdzj Ges Ab¨ ebvg wkcÖv ivbx †` Ges Ab¨b¨ [17 SCOB [2023] HCD 154
(Hindu Inheritance)] ........................................................................................................ 59
16. nvweev †eMg ebvg ivóª [28 BLC (2023) 324] .................................................................. 60
18. evsjv‡`k †d«BU diIqvW©vi G‡mvwm‡qkb ebvg †iwR÷ªvW© R‡q›U ‡÷vK †Kv¤úvwb Ges dvg© Ges Ab¨vb¨ [Writ
Petition No. 150 of 2021] ................................................................................................ 62
19. A¨vW‡fv‡KU Gg. G. AvwRR Lvb ebvg evsjv‡`k wbe©vPb Kwgkb [Writ Petition No. 3185 of 2023] 64
3
1. f‚wg Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I cÖwZKvi AvBb 2023
gvwjKvaxb f‚wg‡Z `Lj I cÖvc¨ AwaKvi wbwðZKi‡Y f‚wg mswkøó Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I cÖ‡qvRbxq cÖw ZKv‡ii j‡ÿ¨
f‚wg Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I cÖwZKvi AvBb 2023 cÖbqY Kiv nq|
1. f‚wg msµvšÍ cÖZviYv I RvwjqvwZ: f‚wg msµvšÍ cÖZviYv I RvwjqvwZ‡K GB AvB‡bi 4 I 5 avivq
mywbw`©ófv‡e kvw¯Í‡hvM¨ Kiv n‡q‡Q| mvaviYZ cÖZviYv msµvšÍ gvgjv `Ûwewai 420 avivq Kiv n‡q
_v‡K hv Rvwgb‡hvM¨ (Bailable)| wKš‘ bZzb f‚wg AvB‡b f‚wg msµvšÍ cÖZviYv‡K RvwgbA‡hvM¨ Ges
Avgj‡hvM¨ Kiv n‡q‡Q (aviv 19)| f‚wg msµvšÍ cÖZviYv I RvwjqvwZi wePv‡ii GLwZqvi RywWwkqvj
g¨wR‡÷ªU‡ì Dci b¨v¯Í Kiv n‡q‡Q| GQvovI aviv 15 Abyhvqx Av‡`k Agvb¨ ev j•N‡bi wePv‡ii
GLwZqviI RywWwkqvj g¨wR‡÷ªU‡ì †Ìqv n‡q‡Q|
2. `wjj evwZ‡ji ‡gvKÏgv: `wjj evwZ‡ji †gvKÏgv GKwU †Ìqvwb cÖK…wZi †gvKvÏgv hv mywbw`©ó cÖwZKvi
AvB‡bi aviv 31 Abyhvqx Kiv nq| bZzb AvB‡bi 4 I 5 avivq cÖZviYv I RvwjqvwZi gva¨‡g m„ó `wjj
evwZ‡ji Rb¨ RywWwkqvj g¨wR‡÷ª‡Ui Av`vj‡Z gvgjv Kiv hv‡e| d‡j wePvicÖ_©x‡ì †fvMvwšÍ Kg‡e I
†dŠR`vwi Av`vj‡Zi gva¨‡gB `wjj evwZ‡ji hveZxq cÖwZKvi cvIqv hv‡e|
3. Gw·wKDwUf g¨wR‡÷ª‡Ui ÿgZv: ‡Kvb e¨w³ A‰eafv‡e `LjPz¨Z n‡j, wZwb `Lj cybiæ×v‡ii Rb¨ 8
aviv Abyhvqx Gw·wKDwUf g¨wR‡÷ª‡Ui wbKU Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cv‡ib| mvavibZ `Lj cyiæ×v‡ii
‡gvKvÏgv mywbw`©ó cÖwZKvi AvB‡bi 9 avivq †Ìqvbx Av`vj‡Z Kiv nq| bZzb AvB‡b `LjPz¨Z e¨w³‡K
Zvi c~e© `Ljxq f‚wg‡Z `Lj c~benv©j Kivi Rb¨ Gw·wKDwUf g¨wR‡÷ªU msÿze× e¨w³i Av‡e`‡bi
‡cÖwÿ‡Z h_vh_ Av‡`k I cÖ‡qvRbxq eë¯’v MÖnb Ki‡Z cvi‡eb| Av‡e`‡bi 3 (wZb) gv‡mi g‡a¨
Av‡e`b wb®úwË Ki‡Z n‡e, Z‡e `LjPz¨Z nIqvi KZ w`‡bi g‡a¨ Av‡e`b Ki‡Z n‡e Zvi †Kvb weavb
†bB|
4. f‚wgi ÿwZmvab I A‰ea cÖ‡ek: †Kvb e¨w³i m¤úwË‡Z A‰eafv‡e cÖ‡ek Ki‡j ev ÿwZmvab Ki‡j
mvavibZ `Ûwewai Aaxb A‰ea AbycÖ‡ek ev Awbómva‡bi gvgjv Kiv nq| f‚wg Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I
cÖwZKvi AvB‡bi 10 I 11 aviv †gvZv‡eK †Kvb e¨w³ †Kvb f‚wgi mxgvbv ev f‚wg‡Z A‰ea fv‡e cÖ‡ek
Ki‡j ev ¯’vcbv wbg©vb Ki‡j ev ÿwZmvab Ki‡j AbwaK 2 (`yB) ermi Kviv`Û I A_©`‡Û `Ûbxq
n‡e|
5. f‚wg weµq Pzw³: ¯’vei m¤úwË weµq Pzw³ mywbw`©ó cÖwZKvi AvB‡bi 21K aviv Abyhvqx Kvh©Ki Kiv nq|
Z‡e G‡ÿ‡Î weµq Pzw³wU Aek¨B †iwRw÷ªK…Z n‡Z n‡e| f‚wg Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I cÖwZKvi AvB‡bi 9
aviv Abyhvqx A‡iwRw÷ªK…Z evqbvbvgvi weiæ‡×I cÖwZKvi cvIqv m¤¢e|
6. f‚wg `L‡j ivLvi AwaKvix e¨w³: GB AvB‡bi aviv 7 Abymv‡i f‚wg `L‡j ivLvi AwaKvix e¨w³iv nj- K.
nvj bvMv`K…Z me‡kl 'LwZqv‡bi gvwjK' L. D³ me‡kl LwZqv‡bi gvwjK ‡_‡K 'DËivwaKvi m~‡Î'
4
gvwjKvbv ev `L‡ji AwaKvic«vß e¨w³ M. n¯ÍvšÍi ev `L‡ji D‡Ï‡k¨ 'AvBbvbyMfv‡e m¤úvw`Z `wjj'-Gi
gva¨‡g gvwjKvbv ev `L‡ji AwaKvic«vß e¨w³ N. 'Av`vj‡Zi Av‡`k'-Gi gva¨‡g gvwjKvbv ev `L‡ji
AwaKvic«vß e¨w³|
7. ÿwZc~iY I cÖwZKvi: f‚wg Aciva cÖwZ‡iva I cÖwZKvi AvB‡bi 20 aviv g‡Z Av`vjZ `Lj vc©‡Yi Rb¨
Gw·wKDwUf g¨wR‡÷ª‡Ui wbKU †cÖiY Ki‡Z cv‡i| GQvovI GB AvB‡b msNwUZ Aciv‡ai d‡j †Kvb
e¨w³ Avw_©Kfv‡e ÿwZMÖ¯’ n‡j Av`vjZ ÿwZMÖ¯’ e¨w³‡K Dchy³ ÿwZc~iY cÖ`v‡bi Av‡`k w`‡Z I
cÖ‡qvRbxq eë¯’v MÖnb Ki‡Z cv‡i| aviv 21 Abyhvqx msÿzä e¨w³i Av‡e`‡bi †cÖwÿ‡Z wePvivaxb
gvgjvi ev`x ev mvÿx‡K wbivcËv cÖ`v‡bi cÖ‡qvRbxq Av‡`k cÖ`vb I eë¯’v MÖnb Ki‡Z cv‡i|
8. Ab¨vb¨ Aciva I †gvevBj †KvU©: GB AvB‡b f‚wgi †kÖbxi cwieZ©b, A‰ea fivU, Avev`‡hvM¨ ev
Pvl‡hvM¨ f‚wgi Dcwi ¯Íi KvUv ev fivU Kiv‡K Aciva wn‡m‡e Mb¨ Kiv n‡q‡Q| AÎ AvB‡bi 22 aviv
Abyhvqx f‚wg msµvšÍ cÖZviYv I RvwjqvwZ, Av‡`k Agvb¨ Kiv Ges GKB Aciva cybivq Kiv e¨ZxZ
Ab¨vb¨ Aciva †gvevBj †KvU© KZ…©K wePvh© n‡e|
2. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023

f‚wgKv
1. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ Aa¨v‡`k, 1985 mv‡ji gva¨‡g ïaygvÎ cvwievwiK wel‡q GLwZqvi m¤úbœ Av`vjZ
cÖwZôv Kiv nq| GB Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqv‡ii welq mg~n nj weevn we‡”Q`, `v¤úZ¨ AwaKvi cybiæ×vi,
†`b‡gvni, fib‡cvlb Ges AwffveKZ¡ I ZË¡veavb| msweav‡bi cÂ`k ms‡kva‡bi gva¨‡g 1982
†_‡K 1986 mvj ch©šÍ mg‡qi g‡a¨ mvgwiK digvb Øviv RvixK…Z Aa¨v‡`kmg~n wejyß †Nvlbv Kiv nq|
Gi Av‡jv‡K Family Court Ordinance, 1985 ¯’wMZ K‡i cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023
cÖbqb Kiv nq|
AvBb cÖbqb
2. MZ 04.09.2023 Bs Zvwi‡L AvBbgš¿x Avwbmyj nK msm‡` cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023 wej
AvKv‡i DÌvcb K‡ib Ges †mB w`bB mvsm`‡ì KÚ‡fv‡U wejwU cvk nq| 18 †m‡Þ¤î 2023 Zvwi‡L
AvBbwU ivóªcwZi m¤§wZ jvf K‡i Ges D³ Zvwi‡L †M‡RU AvKv‡i cªKvwkZ nq| cÖKv‡ki w`bB
1
AvBbwU Kvh©Ki nq| AvB‡b †gvU 31wU aviv i‡q‡Q|

AvB‡bi D‡Ïk¨
3. wb‡Pi D‡Ïk¨mg~n c~i‡bi D‡Ï‡k¨ bZzb AvBbwU cÖbqb Kiv nq:
K. †Rjv R‡Ri Dci Pvc Kgv‡Z Avjv`v cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ MVb|
L. B‡jKUªwbK ev wWwRUvj gva¨‡g weev`x‡K mgb Rvwi weavb mshy³ Kiv|
1
2023 m‡bi 26 bs AvBb
5
M. †gvKÏgv `v‡q‡ii †ÿ‡Î †KvU© wdi cwigvY e„w×|
N. AviwR I wjwLZ Reve ms‡kva‡bi weavb mshy³ Kiv|
msÁv
4. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023 Gi aviv 2, Dcaviv 1 G GB AvB‡b eëüZ kã I Awfe¨w³i msÁv
cÖ`vb Kiv n‡q‡Q| GB AvB‡b B‡gBj A_© B‡j±ªwbK, wWwRUvj I Ab¨ ‡Kvb cÖhyw³MZ gva¨‡g
cÖ¯‘ZK…Z Ges B›Uv‡b‡U ‡cÖwiZ ev cÖvß †Kvb †gBj ev `wjjvw`| cvwievwiK Av`vjZ A_© aviv 4 Gi
Aaxb cÖwZwôZ cvwievwiK Av`vjZ| cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ A_© aviv 18 Gi Aaxb cÖwZwôZ
cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ| gymwjg cvwievwiK AvBb A_© Muslim Family Laws Ordinance,
1961| GB AvB‡b eëüZ †h mKj kã I Awfe¨w³i msÁv cÖ`vb Kiv nq wb †m†ÿ‡Î †Ìqvwb
2
Kvh©wewaÕ‡Z †h A‡_© eëüZ n‡q‡Q †m A‡_© eëüZ n‡e| 3
AvB‡bi cÖvavb¨
5. we`¨gvb Ab¨ †Kvb AvB‡b hv wKQzB _vKzK bv †Kb, GB AvB‡bi weavbewj cÖvavb¨ cv‡e| 4
cvwievwiK Av`vjZ cÖwZôv I GLwZqvi

6. GB AvB‡bi Aax‡b miKvi cÖwZ †Rjvq GK ev GKvwaK cwievwiK Av`vjZ MVb Ki‡e| mnKvix RR ev
wmwbqi mnKvix RR c`gh©v`vi GKRb wePviK wb‡q cvwievwiK Av`vjZ MwVZ n‡e| 5
gymwjg cvwievwiK AvB‡bi weavbvewj mv‡c‡ÿ, cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Zi cvuP (5) ai‡bi †gvKÏgv MÖnY, wePvi Ges
wb®úwËi GLwZqvi _vK‡e, h_v: (K) weevn we‡”Q`; (L) `v¤úZ¨ AwaKvi cybiy×vi; (M) †`b‡gvni; (N)
fiY‡cvlY; Ges (O) wkky mšÍvb‡ì AwffveKZ¡ I ZË¡veavb| 6
‡gvKÏgv `v‡q‡ii c×wZ

7. GB AvB‡bi Aax‡b ‡gvKÏgv `v‡q‡ii †ÿ‡Î †h GjvKvq cÿMY emevm K‡i ev me©‡kl †h GjvKvq
emevm K‡i‡Q A_ev ‡gvKÏgvi KviY m¤ú~b©fv‡e ev AvswkKfv‡e D™¢‚Z n‡q‡Q †mB ¯’v‡bi cvwievwiK
Av`vj‡Z `v‡qi Ki‡Z n‡e| AviwR‡Z we‡iv‡ai mKj Z_¨, ev`x I weev`xi Z_¨, NUbvi ¯’vb I
7
ZvwiL, ev`xi cÖv_©xZ cÖwZKvi Ges mvÿx‡ì bvg I wVKvbv D‡jøL _vK‡e| AviwR Dc¯’vc‡bi mgq
8
ch©vß msL¨K AviwRi bKj I Ab¨vb¨ `wjj mshy³ Ki‡Z n‡e| 9
8. GLwZqviwenxb Av`vj‡Z †Kvb AviwR `vwLj Kiv n‡j Av`vjZ †diZ cÖ`v‡bi KviY D‡jøL K‡i AviwR
†diZ w`‡eb| 10
‡gvKÏgv Lvwi‡Ri KviYmg~n
2
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 2 (1)
3
4
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 3
5
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 4
6
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 5
7
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 6 (1) (L)
8
9
10
6
9. wb‡Pi †h‡Kvb Kvi‡Y AviwR LvwiR n‡Z cv‡i
K. ch©vß msL¨K bKj I `wjjmg~n mshy³ bv _vK‡j AviwR LvwiR n‡q hv‡e|
L. wewa Abyhvqx mgb Rvwii LiP I WvK LiP cÖ`vb bv Ki‡j Av`vjZ AviwR Lvwi‡Ri Av‡`k w`‡eb| 11
M. wewa Abyhvqx ‡KvU© wd cwi‡kva bv Ki‡jI AviwR LvwiR n‡e| 12
mgb I †bvwUk RvwiKiY

10. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AviwR MÖnY Kivi ci weev`x eivei mgb Rvwi Ki‡e| G‡ÿ‡Î Av`vjZ AbwaK 30
w`‡bi GKwU ZvwiL avh© Ki‡e| cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023 Gi bZzb ms‡hvRb B‡gBj ev
13
wWwRUvj gva¨‡g mgb †cÖiY| Av`vjZ mgb Rvwi I †bvwUk ‡cÖi‡Yi cvkvcvwk ev`x KZ…©K mieivnK…Z
weev`xi B‡gBj wVKvbvq mgb Rvwi Ki‡eb| 14
wjwLZ Reve
11. cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z ‡gvKÏgv `v‡qi Ki‡j Av`vjZ weev`x ev weev`x‡ì Reve †`qvi my‡hvM cª`vb
Ki‡eb|
K. weev`xi nvwRivi Rb¨ avh© Zvwi‡L, evw` I weev`x cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z nvwRi n‡eb Ges weev`x
Zvi AvZœc¶ mg_©‡b wjwLZ Reve `vwLj Ki‡eb| 15
L. weev`x c‡¶i mg_©‡b †h mKj mv¶x Dcw¯’Z Kiv n‡e Zv‡ì bvg I wVKvbv wjwLZ Rev‡ei AšÍf©~³
_vK‡e| cieZ©x‡Z bZyb †Kv‡bv mv¶x‡K Dc¯’vcb Kiv hv‡e bv| Z‡e Av`vj‡Zi AbygwZµ‡g cieZ©x
†h-‡Kv‡bv ch©v‡q weev`x Ab¨ mv¶x WvK‡Z cv‡ib| 16
M. weev`xi AvZœc¶ mg_©‡bi cªgvY Zvi `L‡j ev AvIZvax‡b _vKv †Kv‡bv `wj‡ji Ici wbf©ikxj n‡j
wjwLZ Reve `vwL‡ji mgq wZwb †mB `wjj ev Zvi AweKj bKj ev d‡Uvó¨vU Kwc wjwLZ Rev‡ei mv‡_
Av`vj‡Z `vwLj Ki‡eb Ges ïbvwbKv‡j Zv mswkøó e¨w³ Øviv cª`k©b Kiv‡Z n‡e| 17
AviwR I wjwLZ Reve ms‡kvab

12. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ Aa¨v‡`k 1985 †Z AviwR I wjwLZ Reve ms‡kva‡b weavb wQj bv| cvwievwiK
Av`vjZ AvBb, 2023 G AviwR I wjwLZ Reve ms‡kvab Gi weavb mshy³ Kiv nq| ‡gvKÏgvi
†h‡Kvb ch©v‡q c‡ÿi Av‡e`‡bi †cÖwÿ‡Z Av`vjZ AviwR ev wjwLZ Reve ms‡kva‡bi Av‡`k w`‡Z
cv‡i| 18
cÿM‡Yi Abycw¯’wZi djvdj

13. ‡gvKÏgvi avh©K…Z Zvwi‡L †Kvb cÿB Av`vj‡Z Dcw¯’Z bv _vK‡j Av`vjZ ‡gvKÏgv LvwiR K‡i w`‡Z
cv‡i|
11
12
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 6 (8) (L, M)
13
14
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 7 (1) (N)
15
16
17
18
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 9
7
14. ‡h‡ÿ‡Î ev`x Dcw¯’Z wKš‘ weev`x Abycw¯’Z _v‡Kb, †mB‡ÿ‡Î
(K) hw` cÖgvwYZ nq †h, weev`xi cÖwZ mgb ev †bvwUk h_vh_fv‡e Rvwi Kiv n‡q‡Q, Zvn‡j Av`vjZ
‡gvKÏgvwUwU GKZidvfv‡e wb®úwËi j‡ÿ¨ Kvh©µg MÖnY Ki‡e| 19
(L) hw` mgb ev †bvwUk weev`xi Dci h_vh_fv‡e Rvwi bv nq, Zvn‡j Av`vjZ weev`xi Dci b~Zbfv‡e
mgb I †bvwUk Rvwi Kivi Av‡`k cÖ`vb Ki‡e| 20
(M) hw` weev`xi cÖwZ mgb ev †bvwUk Rvwi Kiv n‡q‡Q, Z‡e Zvi Dcw¯’wZi Rb¨ avh©K…Z Zvwi‡L Zv‡K
Dcw¯’Z n‡q Reve cÖ`v‡bi h‡_ó mgq †Ìqv nq bvB, Zvn‡j Av`vjZ cieZx© AbwaK 21 (GKzk)
w`‡bi g‡a¨ wba©vwiZ †Kv‡bv ZvwiL ch©šÍ ‡gvKÏgvi kybvwb ¯’wMZ ivL‡e Ges weev`x‡K D³ ZvwiL
m¤ú‡K© †bvwUk cÖ`vb Ki‡e| 21
(N) †h‡ÿ‡Î Av`vjZ ‡gvKÏgvi kybvwb gyjZwe K‡i GKZidv kybvwbi Rb¨ avh© K‡i Ges weev`x
kybvwbKv‡j c~‡e© nvwRi bv nevi Dchy³ KviY D‡jøL K‡i, †m‡ÿ‡Î Av`vjZ, kZ©mv‡c‡ÿ weev`x‡K
Reve `vwL‡ji my‡hvM cÖ`vb K‡i GBi~‡c kybvwb Ki‡e †hb wZwb avh©K…Z w`‡bB Dcw¯’Z n‡q‡Qb| 22
15. ‡h‡ÿ‡Î weev`x Dcw¯’Z wKš‘ ev`x Abycw¯’Z _v‡Kb, †mB‡ÿ‡Î Av`vjZ ‡gvKÏgv LvwiR Ki‡e| Z‡e
weev`x hw` `vwei m¤ú~Y© ev Askwe‡kl ¯^xKvi K‡i, Zvn‡j weev`xi D³i~c ¯^xK…wZi Dci Av`vjZ
weev`xi weiy‡× wWwµ cÖ`vb Ki‡e| †h‡ÿ‡Î `vwei Askwe‡kl ¯^xKvi Kiv n‡q‡Q, †m‡ÿ‡Î ‡gvKÏgvwUi
ZZUzKz LvwiR Ki‡e hZUKz `vwei Aewkóvs‡ki mv‡_ m¤úwK©Z| 23
16. †h‡ÿ‡Î †Kv‡bv ‡gvKÏgv LvwiR Kiv nq A_ev Dcaviv (4) Gi Aaxb m¤ú~Y© ev AvswkK LvwiR Kiv nq,
†mB‡ÿ‡Î ev`x, LvwiR Av‡`k cÖ`v‡bi 30 (wÎk) w`‡bi g‡a¨, Av‡`k cÖ`vbKvix Av`vj‡Z D³ Av‡`k
iwnZ Kivi Rb¨ Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cvi‡eb Ges hw` wZwb Av`vjZ‡K Abycw¯’wZi Rb¨ h‡_ó KviY wQj
g‡g© mšÍyó K‡ib, Zvn‡j Av`vjZ LvwiR Av‡`k iwnZ K‡i GKwU Av‡`k cÖ`vb Ki‡e| weev`xi weiæ‡×
24
GKZidvfv‡e wWwµ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡j, wZwb wWwµ cÖ`v‡bi 30 (wÎk) w`‡bi g‡a¨, wWwµ cÖ`vbKvix
Av`vj‡Z wWwµ evwZ‡ji Av‡`k `v‡bi Rb¨ Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cvi‡eb| Limitation Act, 1908 Gi
25
Section 5 Gi weavb Dcaviv (6) Gi Aaxb Av‡e`‡bi Rb¨ cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e|

wePvi-c~e© Kvh©µg
17. wjwLZ Reve `vwLj Kiv n‡j cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ‡gvKÏgvi wePvi-c~e© kybvwbi Rb¨ AbwaK 30 (wÎk)
w`‡bi GKwU ZvwiL wba©viY Ki‡e| wePvi-c~e© kybvwbi Rb¨ avh©K…Z Zvwi‡L Av`vjZ AviwR, wjwLZ
Reve Ges cÿMY KZ…©K `vwLjK…Z `wjjmg~n cixÿv Ki‡e| GB mg‡q cÿM‡Yi g‡a¨ we‡ivaxq
26
19
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 10 (2) (K)
20
21
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 10 (2) (M)
22
23
24
25
26
8
welqmg~n avh© Ki‡e Ges m¤¢e n‡j cÿM‡Yi g‡a¨ GKwU Av‡cvl ev gxgvsmvi †Póv Ki‡e| Av‡cvl ev
27
gxgvsmv cÖwZôv m¤¢e bv n‡j Av`vjZ †gvKÏgvi wePvh© welq MVb Ki‡e Ges mvÿ¨ MÖn‡Yi Rb¨ AbwaK
30 (wÎk) w`‡bi GKwU ZvwiL avh© Ki‡e| 28
iæ×Øvi K‡ÿ wePvi (Trial in Camera)

18. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ, Dchy³ g‡b Ki‡j m¤ú~b© ‡gvKÏgv ev †Kvb
Askwe‡kl iæ×Øvi K‡ÿ Abyôvb Ki‡Z cv‡i| Dfqc‡ÿi Av‡e`‡bi †cÖwÿ‡ZI Av`vjZ iæ×Øvi
29
K‡ÿ ‡gvKÏgvi Kvh©µg Abyôvb Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 30
mvÿ¨ wjwce×KiY
19. mvÿ¨ wjwce× Kivi Rb¨ wba©vwiZ Zvwi‡L, Av`vjZ †hi~c Dchy³ g‡b Ki‡e †mBi~‡c Dfq cÿ KZ…©K
nvwRiK…Z mvÿx‡ì mvÿ¨ MÖnY Ki‡e| mvÿxMY Zv‡ì wb‡Ri fvlvq mvÿ¨ cÖ`vb Ki‡eb Ges Zv‡ì
31
†Riv I cybtRevbew›` MÖnY Kiv hv‡e| Av`vjZ GBi~c †Kv‡bv cÖkœ wRÁvmv Ki‡Z wb‡la Ki‡Z cvi‡e
32
hv Av`vj‡Zi wbKU Akøxj, gvbnvwbKi ev Zz”Q ewjqv g‡b n‡e A_ev hv Acgvb ev AcÖ‡qvRbxqfv‡e
AvµgYvZ¥K e‡j cÖZxqgvb n‡e| Av`vjZ Dchy³ g‡b Ki‡j ‡gvKÏgvi Rb¨ cÖ‡qvRbxq †Kv‡bv
33
wel‡qi e¨vL¨vi D‡Ï‡k¨ †h‡Kv‡bv mvÿx‡K †h‡Kv‡bv cÖkœ wRÁvmv Ki‡Z cvi‡e| Av`vjZ †Kv‡bv
34
mvÿxi mvÿ¨ njdbvgvi gva¨‡g cÖ`v‡bi AbygwZ cÖ`vb Ki‡Z cvi‡e Z‡e, Av`vjZ Dchy³ g‡b Ki‡j,
D³ mvÿx‡K cixÿvi Rb¨ WvK‡Z cvi‡e| cÖ‡Z¨K mvÿx KZ…©K cÖ`Ë mvÿ¨ ‡gvKÏgv cwiPvjbvKvix
35
wePviK Øviv Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq wjwLZ n‡e Ges D³ wePviK mvÿ¨‡Z ¯^vÿi Ki‡eb| †Kv‡bv mvÿx
36
Av`vj‡Zi fvlv e¨ZxZ Ab¨ †Kv‡bv fvlvq mvÿ¨ cÖ`vb Ki‡j, ‡gvKÏgv cwiPvjbvKvix wePviK D³
fvlv‡ZB Zv wjwce× Kwi‡eb Ges Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq D³ mv‡ÿï GKwU wbf©i‡hvM¨ Abyev` †iK‡W©i
Ask wnmv‡e MY¨ n‡e| mvÿxi mvÿ¨ wjwce× Kivi ci ‡mwU Zv‡K c‡o kybv‡Z n‡e Ges, cÖ‡qvR‡b Zv
37
ms‡kvab Ki‡Z n‡e| mv‡ÿï †Kv‡bv As‡ki ky×Zv mvÿx A¯^xKvi Ki‡j, wePviK D³ mvÿ¨ ky× Kivi
cwie‡Z©, mvÿx KZ…©K DÌvwcZ AvcwËi GKwU ¯§viK cÖ¯ÍyZ Ki‡Z cvi‡eb Ges wZwb †hi~c cÖ‡qvRbxq
g‡b Ki‡eb †mi~c gšÍe¨ ms‡hvRb Ki‡eb| †h fvlvq mvÿ¨ wjwLZ n‡q‡Q Zv hw` cÖ`Ë mv‡ÿï fvlv
38
n‡Z c„_K nq Ges mvÿx hw` D³ fvlv eyS‡Z Aÿg nb, Zvn‡j mvÿx †h fvlvq mvÿ¨ cÖ`vb K‡i‡Q
Zvi wbKU †mB fvlvq A_ev †m †hB fvlv eyS‡Z mÿg †mB fvlvq Zv e¨vL¨v Ki‡Z n‡e| 39
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
9
wePv‡ii mgvwß
20. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ, mKj c‡ÿi mvÿ¨ MÖnY †kl nevi ci, Dfq c‡ÿi g‡a¨ Av‡cvl ev gxgvsmv
cÖwZôvi Rb¨ cybivq cÖ‡Póv Pvjv‡e| Av‡cvl ev gxgvsmv cÖwZôv m¤¢e bv n‡j, Av`vjZ ivq †NvlYv
40
Ki‡e Ges D³ ivq †NvlYvi m‡½ m‡½ A_ev AbwaK 7 (mvZ) w`‡bi g‡a¨ ivq m¤ú‡K© cÿMY ev
Zv‡ì cÖwZwbwa ev AvBbRxex‡ì h_vh_ †bvwUk cÖ`vb Ki‡Z n‡e I wWwµ cÖ`Ë n‡e| 41
Av‡cvl wWwµ
21. ‡h‡ÿ‡Î we‡ivaxq ‡gvKÏgv Av‡cvl ev gxgvsmvi gva¨‡g wb®úwË nq, †mB‡ÿ‡Î Av`vjZ D³ Av‡cvl ev
gxgvsmv Pzw³i wfwË‡Z ‡gvKÏgvi wWwµ ev wm×všÍ cÖ`vb Ki‡e| 42
cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ cÖwZôv

22. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ Aa¨v‡`k 1985 †Z cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ Gi weavb wQj bv| †Rjv RR
Av`vjZ cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ wn‡m‡e MY¨ Kiv nZ| GB AvB‡bi D‡Ïk¨ c~iYK‡í, miKvi,
cÖ‡Z¨K †Rjvi Rb¨ GK ev GKvwaK cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ cÖwZôv Ki‡Z cvi‡e| †Rjv RR 43
c`gh©v`vi 1 (GK) Rb wePvi‡Ki mgš^‡q cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ MwVZ n‡e| cvwievwiK Avwcj
44
Av`vjZ cÖwZôvi c~e© ch©šÍ ¯^xq Awa‡ÿ‡Î †Rjv RR Av`vjZ cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ wn‡m‡e `vwqZ¡
cvjb Ki‡e| 45
23. cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Zi ivq, wWwµ I Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vj‡Z Avwcj `v‡qi Kiv
hv‡e| Z‡e cvwievwiK Av`vjZ KZ…©K cÖ`Ë Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939
Gi section 2 Gi clause (viii) Gi sub-clause (d) †Z ewY©Z Kvi‡Y weevn we‡”Q‡ì †ÿÎ
e¨ZxZ Ab¨ †Kv‡bv weevn we‡”Q`; Ges †`b‡gvn‡ii †ÿ‡Î AbwaK 50 (cÂvk) nvRvi UvKvi wWwµi
weiæ‡× Avwcj `v‡qi Kiv hv‡e bv| mswkøó ivq, wWwµ ev Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× 30 w`‡bi g‡a¨ Avwcj
46
`v‡qi Ki‡Z n‡e| cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ KZ…©K cÖ`Ë Av‡`k cvwievwiK Av`vjZ‡K AewnZ
47
Ki‡Z n‡e Ges D³ Av`vjZ Z`bymv‡i ivq, wWwµ I Av‡`k ms‡kvab Ki‡e| 48
‡gvKÏgv I Avwcj ¯’vbvšÍi I ¯’wMZKiY

24. nvB‡KvU© wefvM, †Kv‡bv c‡ÿi Av‡e`bµ‡g ev ¯^xq D‡`¨v‡M, wjwLZ Av‡`k Øviv, `v‡qiK…Z †h‡Kv‡bv
†gvKÏgv GKB †Rjvi GK cvwievwiK Av`vjZ n‡Z Ab¨ cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z A_ev GK †Rjvi
cvwievwiK Av`vjZ n‡Z Ab¨ †Rjvi cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z Ges Avwcj GK †Rjvi cvwievwiK Avwcj
Av`vjZ n‡Z Ab¨ †Rjvi cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vj‡Z, ¯’vbvšÍvi Ki‡Z cvwi‡e| cvwievwiK Avwcj
49
40
41
42
AÎ AvB‡bi aviv 15
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
10
Av`vjZ, †Kv‡bv c‡ÿi Av‡e`‡bi cwi‡cÖwÿ‡Z ev ¯^xq D‡`¨v‡M, wjwLZ Av‡`k Øviv GB AvB‡bi Aaxb
†h‡Kv‡bv †gvKÏgv Zvi wbR GLwZqvivaxb ¯’vbxq mxgvbvi g‡a¨ GK cvwievwiK Av`vjZ n‡Z Ab¨
cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z ¯’vbvšÍi Ki‡Z cvi‡e| GB avivi Aaxb †h Av`vj‡Z †Kv‡bv †gvKÏgv ev Avwcj
50
¯’vbvšÍwiZ n‡e †mB Av`vjZ Zv Ggbfv‡e wb®úwË Ki‡e, †hb D³ †gvKÏgv ev Avwcj IB Av`vj‡ZB
`v‡qi Kiv n‡q‡Q| nvB‡KvU© wefvM wjwLZ Av‡`k Øviv †Kvb cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z ev cvwievwiK Avwcj
51
Av`vj‡Z wePvivaxb †h‡Kvb †gvKvÏgv ev Avwcj ¯’wMZ Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 52
cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ KZ…©K AšÍe©Z©x Av‡`k

25. hw` †gvKÏgv ev Avwc‡ji †h‡Kv‡bv ch©v‡q, cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ njdbvgv
ev Ab¨ wKQz Øviv mš‘ó nq †h, †gvKÏgv ev Avwc‡ji D‡Ïk¨‡K e¨vnZ Kiv n‡Z †Kv‡bv cÿ‡K weiZ
ivLvi Rb¨ ZvrÿwYK eë¯’v MÖnY Riywi, †m‡ÿ‡Î Av`vjZ †hiƒc Dchy³ cÖZxqgvb n‡e †mi~c AšÍe©Z©x
Av‡`k cÖ`vb Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 53
Av`vjZ Aegvbbv
26. hw` †Kv‡bv e¨w³ cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ Aegvbbv K‡i‡Qb g‡g© MY¨ n‡j,
cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ, Av`vjZ Aegvbbvi `v‡q Awfhy³ e¨w³i
wePvi Ki‡Z cvi‡e Ges Zv‡K AbwaK 200 (`yBkZ) UvKv A_©`‡Û `wÛZ Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 54
cÖwZwbwa‡ì gva¨‡g Dcw¯’wZ

27. hw` †Kv‡bv e¨w³i GB AvB‡bi Aaxb cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vj‡Zi m¤§y‡L mvÿx
e¨ZxZ Ab¨ †Kv‡bv Kvi‡Y Dcw¯’Z nevi cÖ‡qvRb nq Ges D³ e¨w³ hw` c`©vbwkb gwnjv ev
kvixwiKfv‡e Aÿg nb, Zvn‡j cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ Zvi wbKU n‡Z
h_vh_fv‡e ÿgZvcÖvß †Kv‡bv cÖwZwbwa‡K Zvi c‡ÿ Av`vj‡Zi m¤§y‡L Dcw¯’Z nevi AbygwZ cÖ`vb
Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 55
‡KvU© wd
28. GB AvB‡bi Aaxb cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z ‡gvKÏgv `v‡q‡ii †ÿ‡Î †KvU© wd n‡e 200 UvKv| 56
gymwjg cvwievwiK AvB‡bi weavb‡K cÖfvweZ bv Kiv

29. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvB‡bi †Kv‡bv wKQzB gymwjg cwievwiK AvBb A_ev Zàxb cÖYxZ wewagvjvi †Kv‡bv
weavb‡K cÖfvweZ Ki‡e bv| 57
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Gi D‡Ïk¨ c~iYK‡í cvwievwiK Av`vjZ‡K †Rjv Av`vjZi~‡c
MY¨KiY|
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
11
30. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Gi D‡Ïk¨ c~iYK‡í, District Court
wnmv‡e MY¨ n‡e| D³ AvB‡bi Aaxb District Court wnmv‡e cvwievwiK Av`vjZ KZ…©K cÖ`Ë †h
58
†Kv‡bv Av‡`‡ki weiy‡× cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vj‡Z Avwcj `v‡qi Kiv hv‡e| 59
KwZcq AvB‡bi weavbvejxi cÖ‡hvR¨Zv I AcÖ‡hvR¨Zv

31. GB AvBb ev Zàxb cÖYxZ †Kv‡bv wewa‡Z wfbœi~c wKQz D‡jøL bv _vK‡j, Evidence Act, 1872
Ges †Ìqvwb Kvh©wewai aviv 10 I 11 e¨ZxZ Ab¨vb¨ weavbmgn~ cvwievwiK Av`vjZ I cvwievwiK
Avwcj Av`vj‡Zi Kvh©avivi †ÿ‡Î cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e bv| cvwievwiK Av`vjZ I cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vj‡Zi
mKj Kvh©avivi †ÿ‡Î Oaths Act, 1873 cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e| 60
wewa cÖbq‡bi ÿgZv

32. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvB‡bi D‡Ïk¨ c~iYK‡í, miKvi, miKvwi †M‡R‡U cÖ Ávcb Øviv, wewa cÖbqb
Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 61
iwnZKiY I †ndvRZ
33. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023 Øviv Family Courts Ordinance, 1985, GZØviv iwnZ Kiv
n‡jv| D³ Ordinance Aaxb †Kv‡bv Kvh©aviv Awb®úbœ _vK‡j Zv Ggbfv‡e wb®úbœ Ki‡Z n‡e †hb
D³ Ordinance iwnZ nq wb| 62
Dcmsnvi
34. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ Aa¨v‡`k GKwU Zvr¶wYK mvdj¨ wQj| wKš‘ IB Aa¨v‡`‡k wKQy NvUwZ wQj, †hgb
c„_K Avwcj Av`vjZ bv _vKv, AviwR I wjwLZ Reve ms‡kva‡bi weavb bv _vKv BZ¨vw`| bZyb AvB‡b
GB ¸iæZ¡c~Y© êwkó¨¸wj Ges AviI A‡bK wKQy i‡q‡Q| Avgiv Avkv Kwi GB bZyb cvwievwiK Av`vjZ
AvBb 2023 c~e©eZ©x Aa¨v‡`‡ki Afve KvwU‡q DV‡e|
Avcxj wefvM
1. g„Mv¼v ‡gvnb Xvjx Ges Ab¨vb¨ ebvg wPËiÄb gÐj Ges Ab¨vb¨ 18 SCOB
[2023] AD 20
AÎ gvgjvq ev`x G‡jv‡Kkx gÛj Zvi `v`x iæwLbx `v‡ki ¯¿xab m¤úwËi DËivwaKvix nb| AZtci ev`x Zvi bv‡g
Rwg †iKW© Kivi `vwqZ¡ weev`x‡ì Dci Ac©Y K‡ib hviv m¤ú‡K© Zvi gvgv wQ‡jb| wKš‘ wek¦vm f½ K‡i Zviv
gvgjvi RwgwU GmG †iK‡W© Zv‡ì bv‡g †iKW© K‡ib| cieZ©x‡Z weevw`MY Zvi ¯^Z¡ A¯^xKvi K‡i| ZvB, ev`x
58
59
60
61
62
12
GKwU gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib Ges UÖvqvj †KvU© Zvi c‡¶ ivq †`q| KviY wn›`z DËivwaKvi AvBb, 1929 Gi
ms‡kvabx‡Z ejv n‡q‡Q †h, Kb¨vi Kb¨v‡KI DËivwaKvix wnmv‡e AšÍf©z³ Kiv n‡q‡Q| mzZivs, †mB AvBb
Abzhvqx ev`x n‡”Q iæwLbx `v‡ki †i‡L hvIqv m¤úwËi DËivwaKvix|
D³ iv‡q ms¶zä n‡q weev`xMY Lzjbvi †Rjv RR Av`vj‡Z Avwcj Ki‡j Zv LvwiR n‡q hvq Ges UÖvqvj †Kv‡UiÖ
wWwµ envj ivLv nq| czbivq ms¶zä n‡q weev`xMY †Ìqvbx Kvh©wewai 115 aviv Abzhvqx, nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wmwfj
wiwfkb `v‡qi K‡ib| nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiwfkb bvgÄi K‡i Ges Avcxj Av`vj‡Zi ivq I wWwµ envj iv‡L|
cwi‡k‡l, weev`xMY msweav‡bi 103 Aby‡”Q‡ì Aax‡b jxf Uz Avwc‡ji Rb¨ Av‡e`b K‡ib Ges nvB‡KvU© wefvM
jxf Uz Avwcj gÄyi K‡i|
weev`xMY `vex K‡ib, bvjxwk m¤úwËwU ¯¿xab m¤úwË bq| GQvovI, Zviv AviI e‡jb, bvwjwk m¤úwËwU hw` ¯¿xab
m¤úwË n‡qI _v‡K, GwU ev`x G‡jv‡Kkxi Dci n¯ÍvšÍi n‡ebv whwb iæwLbxi Kb¨vi Kb¨v| Zviv AviI D‡jøL
K‡i‡Q †h Ô`qvfvMÕ ¯‹zj Abzmv‡i, GKRb gwnjv hLb DËivwaKvim~‡Î †KvbI m¤úwË cziæl A_ev gwnjv †_‡K
†c‡q _v‡K, †mB m¤úwËwU Zvi ¯¿xab e‡j MY¨ n‡ebv| †mB m¤úwË‡Z Zvi mxwgZ ¯^v_© _v‡K Ges Zvi g„Zyï c‡i
m¤úwËwU Zvi DËivwaKvix‡ì Kv‡Q P‡j hvq bv eis hvi KvQ †_‡K †m m¤úwËwU †c‡qwQj Zvi †mB cieZ©x
DËivwaKvixi Kv‡Q P‡j hvq| mzZivs hw` †Kvb gwnjv DËivwaKvim~‡Î m¤úwË †c‡q _v‡K Zvn‡j †mB m¤úwËwU
gwnjvi cieZ©x ¯¿xab DËivwaKvix‡ì Kv‡Q P‡j hv‡e|
ev`xc‡¶i hzw³ wQj, hLb GKwU Kb¨v Zvi gv‡qi ¯¿xa‡bi DËivwaKvix nq, ZLb Kb¨v †mB m¤úwËwU‡K GKRb
cy‡Îi g‡Zv MÖnY K‡i| KviY cyÎ Ges Kb¨v mgvbfv‡e DËivwaKvix| myZivs, Gjy‡Kkx gÛj †mB ¯¿xab m¤úwË
cvIqvi AwaKvix|
Avwcj wefvM Gi fvl¨g‡Z mvaviYZ DËivwaKv‡ii wbqg nj- †h m¤úwË GKevi Kv‡iv Dci b¨¯Í nq, †mwU Avi
n¯ÍvšÍi hv‡e bv| wKš‘ wn›`z gwnjv‡ì †¶‡Î, m¤úwË‡Z mxwgZ gvwjKvbv cvIqvi e¨vcviwU GB mvaviY wbq‡gi
ewnf©‚Z| KviY m¤úwË gvwj‡Ki DËivwaKvixi Kv‡Q wd‡i hv‡e| wKš‘ ¯¿xab m¤úwËi †¶‡Î, GwU †mB m¤úwËi
gvwj‡Ki (gwnjvi) wbKUZg DËivwaKvixi Kv‡Q P‡j hvq| D‡jøL¨ ¯¿xab m¤úwËi DËivwaKvi m¤ú~Y© fv‡e GKRb
gwnjvi Kv‡Q _v‡K| cwi‡k‡l, Avwcj wefvM, Ô`qvfvMvÕ Gi bxwZ, ‡gvjøvi wn›`z AvB‡bi bxwZi cvV¨¸wj
ch©v‡jvPbv K‡i Ges A¨vwgKvm wKDwii gZvgZ ï‡b ev`xi c‡¶ ivq cÖ`vb K‡i Avwcj LvwiR K‡i †`q| ivqwUi
g~j fvl¨ wb‡gœ †`qv nj-
The guiding ‘Principle of Law of Inheritance’ under the Dayabhaga

School of Law, which prevails in Bangladesh, is the doctrine of religious
efficacy. Religious efficacy means capacity to confer special benefit
upon the deceased person. Succession is the mode of devolution of
13
property under the Dayabhaga system. The general rule of inheritance is
that once a property is vested upon any one, it will not be divested. But
in case of Hindu woman, getting limited ownership in the property is
contradictory to this general Rule as the property will revert back to the
heir of the owner. Only in case of Stridhan property, it reverts back to
the nearest heir of the female who is the owner of that property. It is to
be noted that succession of the ‘Stridhan property’ is held absolutely by
a female.
2. evsjv‡`k ebvg ‡mwjg Lvb 18 SCOB [2023] AD 36

AÎ gvgjvi weev`x, 2015 mv‡j †gNbv b`xi wewfbœ †gŠRvq eb¨v cÖwZnZ I †bŠhvb PjvP‡ji myweav‡_©
nvB‡WªvMÖvwdK Rwic Ges b`x Lbb I b`xi Zj‡`k †_‡K evjy D‡Ëvj‡bi AbygwZi Rb¨ Rb¯^v‡_© GKwU wiU
wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡ib| nvB‡Kv‡U©i wb‡`©kbv Abyhvqx weev`xi Li‡P weAvBWweøDwUG ‡gNbv b`xi Zj‡`‡k
nvB‡WªvMÖvwdK Rwic cwiPvjbv K‡i wi‡cvU© cÖ`vb K‡i †h b`xi Zj‡`‡k 86.30 jÿ NbdzU evjy i‡q‡Q|
nvB‡KvU© wefvM D³ wi‡cvU© Avg‡j wb‡q mswkøó KZ…©cÿ‡K †gNbv b`xi Wz‡evPi †_‡K evjy D‡Ëvj‡b weev`x‡K
mn‡hvMxZv Kivi ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib| nvB‡Kv‡U©i iv‡qi weiæ‡× miKvicÿ Avcxj wefv‡M GKwU wjf Uz Avcxj
`v‡qi K‡ib|
miKvic‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxwe e‡jb †h, evjygnvj Ges gvwU eë¯’vcbv AvBb, 2010 Abyhvqx ïay nvB‡WªvMÖvwdK
Rwic wi‡cvU© b`xi Zj‡`k †_‡K evjy D‡Ëvj‡bi GKgvÎ wfwË bq| evjygnvj Ges gvwU eë¯’vcbv AvBb, 2010
Gi aviv 9 Abyhvqx †WcywU Kwgkbvi nvB‡WªvMÖvwdK Rwic wi‡cvU© MÖnb Ki‡eb Ges D³ ¯’vb‡K evjygnvj †Nvlbv
Kivi cÖ¯Íve wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU †cÖib Ki‡eb| A_v©r †Kvb ¯’vb evjygnvj †Nvlbv Kivi GLwZqvi mswkøó
wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii AbygwZ mv‡c‡ÿ †Rjv cÖkvm‡Ki| evjygnvj Ges gvwU eë¯’vcbv AvBb, 2010 Gi aviv
10(1) Ges aviv 11 Abyhvqx mKj evjygnvj Db¥~³ ìc‡Îi gva¨‡g BRviv cÖ`vb Ki‡Z n‡e Ges ‡Kvb evjygnvj
BRviv cÖ`vb Kiv bv n‡q _vK‡j, D³ evjygnvj n‡Z Ab¨ †Kvb c×wZ‡Z evjy ev gvwU D‡Ëvjb, cwienY, wecYb
I mieivn Kiv hv‡e bv Ges GB g‡g© †Kvb ivR¯Î Av`vq Kiv hv‡e bv| wKš‘ G‡ÿ‡Î nvB‡KvU© wefvM 2010
mv‡ji AvB‡bi avivmg~n AMÖvn¨ K‡i weev`x‡K evjygnvj BRviv cÖ`vb K‡i GLwZqvi ewn©f‚Z KvR K‡i‡Qb|
Aciw`‡K weev`xic‡ÿi weÁ AvBbRxwe `vex K‡ib †h, weev`x AÎ GjvKvi Rb-cÖwZwbwa n‡q b`xi wewfbœ ¯’v‡b
bve¨Zvi ¯^v‡_© wewfbœ c`‡ÿc MÖnb K‡i‡Qb, we‡kl K‡i bvjxwk †gŠRvmg~‡n evjy/gvwU AcmviY| bvjxwk
†gŠRvmg~‡n evjy/gvwU AcmviY weAvBWweøDwUG Gi nvB‡WªvMÖvwdK Rwic wi‡cvU© I Av`vj‡Zi wb‡`©kbv †g‡bB Kiv
n‡q‡Q|
14
`yÕc‡ÿi ïbvbx †k‡l Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h,
1. evjygnvj I gvwU eë¯’cbv AvBb, 2010 Abyhvqx ‡Kvb ¯’vb‡K evjygnvj wn‡m‡e †Nvlbv I BRviv †Ìqvi
G_wZqvi wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii AbygwZ mv‡c‡ÿ mswkøó †Rjv cÖmvk‡Ki| GB gvgjvq †gNbv b`xi mswkøó
Wz‡evPi‡K/‡gŠRvmg~n‡K evjygnvj wn‡m‡e †Nvlbv Kiv nqwb| 2010 mv‡ji AvB‡bi weavb e¨ZxZ †Kvb
¯’vb‡K evjygnvj wn‡m‡e †Nvlbv Kiv hv‡e bv|
2. nvB‡KvU© wefvM msweav‡bi 102 Aby‡”Q‡` cÖvß ÿgZve‡j evjygnvj Ges gvwU eë¯’vcbv AvBb, 2010
AMÖvn¨ K‡i †Kvb ¯’vb‡K evjygnvj wn‡m‡e †Nvlbv Ki‡Z cv‡i bv| G‡ÿ‡Î nvB‡KvU© wefvM cÖkœwe×
†gŠRvmg~n‡K ÔevjygnvjÕ †Nvlbv K‡i GLwZqvi ewnf‚©Z KvR K‡i‡Q|
cwi‡k‡l Avcxj wefvM nvB‡Kv‡U©i wefv‡Mi ivq‡K evwZj †Nvlbv K‡i Avcxj wb®úwË K‡ib|
iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wbv¤œ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡jv:
The Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district is empowered to

declare a certain area as ‘Balumahal’ subject to the fulfillment of
certain conditions with the approval of concerned Divisional
Commissioner. In the instant case, the alleged ‘Dubochars’ of Meghna
River bed under the mouzas in question have never been declared as
‘Balumahal’ by the concerned Deputy Commissioner complying the
provisions of relevant law i.e. Ain 2010. ‘Balumahal’ cannot be leased
out otherwise, save and except under the Ain, 2010.
The High Court Division cannot assume the power and jurisdiction of a
particular authority conferred by a specific law/statute in exercising
power under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of
Bangladesh and thus, the High Court cannot declare a particular area as
‘Balumahal’ making a particular law i.e. Ain 2010 nugatory or
redundant. Thus, in this particular case the High Court Division has
traveled beyond its jurisdiction declaring the mouzas as ‘BaluMahal’.
15
3. evsjv‡`k ebwkí Dbœqb K‡c©v‡ikb I Ab¨vb¨ ebvg AvBqye Avjx I Ab¨vb¨
[28 weGjwm (GwW) 317]
-evsjv‡`k k«g AvBb, 2006 Gi 33 avivq Aemi MÖn‡Yi Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× Awf‡hvM DÌvcb Kivi ‡Kv‡bv weavb
‡bB|
G‡¶‡Î wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì evsjv‡`k ebwkí Dbœqb K‡c©v‡ik‡bi Aax‡b wewfbœ cÖwZôv‡b kÖwgK wn‡m‡e wb‡qvM
‡Ìqv nq Ges cieZ©xKv‡j Zv‡ì ¯’vqxfv‡e PvKwi‡Z AšÍ©f‚³ Kiv nq| cvewjK K‡c©v‡ikb (g¨v‡bR‡g›U ‡Kv-
AwW©‡bkb) AwW©b¨vÝ, 1986 Abymv‡i wiU wcwUkbKvix‡ì PvKwii wewa weavb wbqwš¿Z nq Ges Aa¨v‡`k, 1986
Gi 14G aviv Abyhvqx Zv‡ì Aem‡ii eqm 60 eQi n‡jI AvB‡bi D³ weavb j•Nb K‡i 57 eQi eq‡m Zv‡ì
Aemi cÖ`vb Kiv nq| AvwcjKvix k«g AvBb, 2006 Gi 28 avivi D×…Z K‡i e‡jb, ‡h ‡KvbI cÖwZôv‡b wbhy³
GKRb kÖwgK Zvi eqm 57 (mvZvbœ) eQi c~Y© nIqvi c‡i PvKwi ‡_‡K Aemi MªnY Ki‡eb| AvwcjKvix‡ì weÁ
AvBbRxex AviI ‡hvM K‡i‡Qb ‡h k«g AvB‡bi 33 avivq ewY©Z c×wZ ‡kl K‡i Aem‡ii Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡×
Zv‡ì Awf‡hvM DÌvc‡bi Rb¨ kªg Av`vjZ Dchy³ ‡dvivg wQj| myZivs wiU wcwUkb AvBbZ iÿbxq bq|
Rev‡e wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì weÁ ‡KŠumywj e‡jb ‡h, 1986 mv‡ji Aa¨v‡`‡ki aviv 3 Gi weavb Abymv‡i
AvcvZZt ejer Ab¨ ‡Kvb AvB‡b AmvgÄm¨c~Y© hvnv wKQyB _vKyK bv ‡Kb, Dnv‡Z ewY©Z weavbvejx Ges Zàxb
c«YxZ cÖweavbgvjv Kvh©Ki nB‡e, kªg AvB‡bi 28 avivi weavbvejxi Dci Aa¨v‡`k 1986 cÖvavb¨ cv‡e|
GgZve¯’vq Avwcj wefvM D‡jøL K‡ib,
Section 33 of the Labour Act does not provide any provision for
agitating grievances against the order of retirement. Therefore, the
grievances that arose out of age of retirement does not come within the
mischief of Section 33 and the writ petitions were quite maintainable.
A_©vr kªg AvB‡bi 33 avivq Aem‡ii Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× Awf‡hvM DÌvc‡bi ‡Kv‡bv weavb ‡bB| myZivs Aemi
MÖn‡Yi eqm ‡_‡K D™¢~Z Awf‡hvM¸‡jv 33 avivi g‡a¨ c‡o bv Ges wiU wcwUkb¸‡jv AvBbZ i¶Yxq wQj|
4. cªevmx Kj¨vY e¨vsK ebvg ‡gvt eRjyi ikx` I Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW)
145]
e¨vsK Zvi AvPi‡Yi gva¨‡g Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Avk¦vm w`‡qwQj ‡h Zv‡ì e¨vs‡Ki wbqwgZ ‡mU Av‡c AvËxKiY
Kiv n‡e hv GKwU ‰ea cÖZ¨vkv (legitimate expectation) ‰Zwi K‡i ‡h Zviv e¨vs‡K ¯’vqx n‡e|
AÎ gvgjvq wiU Av‡e`bKvixiv `xN©w`b c«evmx Kj¨vY e¨vs‡K B›Uvb© Awdmvi wn‡m‡e Kg©iZ wQ‡jb, hwÌ Zv‡ì
c«v_wgK wb‡qvvM wQj gvÎ 3 (wZb) gvm| e¨vsKwU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì A¯’vqx wfwË‡Z PvKwi‡Z ‡i‡LwQj Z‡e Kvh©Z
Zviv e¨vs‡Ki GKRb wbqwgZ Kg©KZ©vi `vwqZ¡ cvjb KiwQj| AmsLëvi, Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Zv‡ì wb‡qvMKZ©v
Øviv Avkv ‡Ìqv n‡qwQj ‡h Zviv e¨vs‡Ki wbqwgZ ‡mUAv‡ci Aax‡b hy³ n‡e| Z‡e weev`x‡ì wbw®ŒqZv I
16
e¨_©Zvi Kvi‡Y `xN© mgq A‡c¶vi ci ‡kl ch©šÍ wiU Av‡e`b K‡ib wiUKvixiv| wb‡qvMKvix cÖwZôv‡bi mš‘wói
Kvi‡Y Av‡e`bKvix‡ì PvKwi‡Z envj ivLv n‡q‡Q hv Rywbqi Gw·wKDwUf Awdmvi wnmv‡e e¨vs‡Ki wbqwgZ
Kvh©µ‡g AvËxKi‡Yi ‰ea cÖZ¨vkv (legitimate expectation) ‰Zwi K‡iwQj| Av‡e`bKvixiv cÖ‡qvRbxq
wk¶vMZ ‡hvM¨Zv, `¶Zv Ges PvKwii eqm wb‡q PvKwi‡Z cÖ‡ek K‡iwQ‡jb wKš‘ GLb GZ eQi c‡i Zv‡ì
‡ewkifvMiB miKvix PvKwi wba©wiZ eqm ‡cwi‡q ‡M‡Q| Av‡e`bKvixiv Av`vj‡Zi wbKU wb‡¤œi cÖwZKvimg~n
`vex K‡i iæj wb®úwË Pvq:
 Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Rywbqi Gw·wKDwUf Awdmvi ev Ab¨ ‡KvbI mgZyj¨ ev Abyiƒc c‡` Av‡e`‡bi my‡hvM w`‡Z
n‡e;
 wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Av‡e`b‡K Ab¨vb¨ Av‡e`bKvix‡ì ‡P‡q AMÖvwaKvi w`‡Z n‡e Ges e¨vs‡K Zv‡ì
AwfÁZv I mvwf©m ‡iKW© we‡ePbvq wb‡Z n‡e;
 GB Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Ab¨‡ì wb‡qv‡Mi Av‡M wb‡qvM w`‡Z n‡e;
 Av‡e`bKvix‡ì eqm wkw_j K‡i we‡ePbv Ki‡Z n‡e|
AvcxjKvixi c‡¶ Dcw¯’Z weÁ A¨vUwb© ‡Rbv‡ij Rbve G Gg AvwgbDwÏb e‡jb ‡h, weev`x‡ì wb‡qvMc‡Î
¯úóZB ‡Kvb ‰ea cªZ¨vkv (legitimate expectation) _vKvi wb‡la i‡q‡Q| wb‡qvMc‡Îi 4 I 5 b¤î k‡Z©
ejv n‡q‡Q; Ò..wkÿvbexkKv‡ji mgvwß‡Z PvKzixi ¯’vqx wb‡qv‡Mi wbðqZv enb Ki‡e bv Ges kZ© 5 Abyhvqx
Kv‡Ri m‡šÍvlRbK djvd‡ji Dci Avcbvi PvKzix ¯’vqxKiY Kiv †h‡Z cv‡i|”
weev`xM‡Yi c‡¶ Dcw¯’Z weÁ †KŠïjx e‡jb ‡h, weev`xiv `xN©w`b a‡i e¨vs‡Ki B›Uvb© Awdmvi wn‡m‡e `vwqZ¡
cvjb K‡i‡Qb Ges c«v_wgKfv‡e 3 (wZb) gv‡mi Rb¨ wb‡qvM ‡c‡jI e¨vsK KZ©…c¶ Zv‡ì `¶Zv I AvšÍwiKZvi
K_v we‡ePbv K‡i e¨vs‡K envj ‡i‡L‡Q| e¨vsK Zvi AvPi‡Yi gva¨‡g Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Avk¦vm w`‡qwQj ‡h Zv‡ì
e¨vs‡Ki wbqwgZ ‡mUAv‡c AvËxKiY Kiv n‡e hv GKwU ‰ea cÖZ¨vkv (legitimate expectation) ‰Zwi K‡i ‡h
Zv‡ì e¨vs‡K ¯’vqx Kiv n‡e| ¯^fveZB e¨vs‡K B›Uvb© Awdmvi wn‡m‡e `xN©w`b PvKwi Kivi ci Av‡e`bKvix‡ì
miKvwi PvKwii eqm K‡g hvq|
Av`vjZ wb‡gœv³ wb‡`©kbvmn ‡Ìqvvwb Av‡e`bwU wb®úwË K‡i‡Qb
".... The respondents should be allowed to apply for the post of Junior
Executive Officers or any other equivalent or similar posts by relaxing
their age.”
A_©vr wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì eqm wkw_j K‡i Rywbqi Gw·wKDwUf Awdmvi ev Ab¨ ‡KvbI mgZzj¨ ev Abyiƒc c‡`
Av‡e`b Kivi AbygwZ ‡Ìqv DwPZ|
17
5. Uv½vBj ‡K›`ªxq mgevq e¨vsK wjwg‡U‡Wi c‡ÿ mfvcwZ KzìZ-B-Gjvnx
(‡gvt) ebvg iv‡njv RvwKi I Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 57]
-102 Aby‡”Q‡ì g¨v‡ÛU Abyhvqx GKB wel‡q ‡Ìqvwb gvgjv I wiU Kvh©µg GKm‡½ Pj‡Z cv‡i bv| AvBb Øviv
mgvbfv‡e Kvh©Ki cÖwZKvi DcMg¨ n‡j nvB‡KvU© wiU GLwZqvi cÖ‡qvM Ki‡Z cv‡i bv|
AÎ ‡Ìqvbx Av‡e`‡b iv‡njv RvwKimn Ab¨vbïv Uv½vBj ‡K›`ªxq mgevq e¨vsK wjwg‡U‡Wi (AZtci mgevq
e¨vsK bv‡g cwiwPZ) gvwjKvbvaxb mgevq mycvi gv‡K©‡Ui BRviv`vi/fvovwUqv wQ‡jb Ges AvwcjKvix mgevq
e¨vs‡Ki c‡ÿ wQ‡jb mfvcwZ Rbve KzìZ-B-Gjvnx|
mgevq e¨vsK 2013 mv‡j, Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Zv‡ì m¤úwË‡Z GKwU cwiKwíZ `kZjv gv‡K©U wbg©v‡bi K_v
Rvwb‡qwQj| 21.12.2013 Zvwi‡Li g‡a¨ Lvwj ‡`vKvb n¯ÍvšÍi Ki‡Z ejv nq| ‡`vKvb n¯ÍvšÍi bv Kiv m‡Z¡I
2014 mv‡ji gvP© gv‡m febwU wbjv‡g ‡Zvjv nq| Av‡e`bKvix I Ab¨vb¨ ‡`vKvb fvovwUqviv wbjvg wewµ P¨v‡jÄ
K‡i nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M 2014 mv‡ji wiU wcwUkb bs 4009 `v‡qi K‡ib| mgevq e¨vs‡Ki `vwe, bZyb ‰Zwi evRv‡i
‡`vKv‡bi RvqMv eÈ‡bi Rb¨ c~e©eZ©x fvovv‡U‡ì m‡½ Zviv Pyw³ K‡iwQj| wbg©vY e¨‡qi Dci wfwË K‡i me©wbgœ
g~‡j¨ ‡`vKvb ‡¯úm eivÏ w`‡Z e¨vsK‡K wb‡`©k ‡`q nvB‡KvU© wefvM| Av‡e`bKvix Ges fvovwUqviv Av`vj‡Zi
Av‡`‡ki mv‡_ wØgZ †cvlY K‡iwQ‡jb, KviY e¨vsK nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi †e‡a †Ìqv g~‡jï mv‡_ AwZwi³ wd `vwe
K‡iwQj Ges evRviwU ‡Rvi K‡i `Lj K‡iwQj| c~e©eZ©x PviRb fvovwUq mgevq mwgwZ AvBb, 2001 Gi
50(1)(M) avivq ‡iwR÷«vi I gnvcwiPvj‡Ki wbKU we‡iva gvgjv `v‡qi Ki‡jI ‡WcywU ‡iwR÷«vi wePvivaxb wiU
wcwUk‡bi Kvi‡Y wm×všÍ w`‡Z A¯^xK…wZ Rvbvb| mgevq mwgwZi wefvMxq Kvh©vj‡qi hyM¥ ‡iwR÷«v‡ii Av‡`‡ki
weiæ‡× fvovwUqviv Avwcj K‡ib, ‡hLv‡b mgevq e¨vsK‡K me©wbgœ wbg©vY g~j¨ wba©viY K‡i c~e©eZ©x
gvwjK/fvovwUqv‡ì ‡`vKvb eivÏ ‡Ìqvi wb‡`©k ‡Ìqv nq| iv‡qi ‰eaZv wb‡q cÖkœ Zz‡j mgevq e¨vsK wiU
wcwUkb bs 14241/2016 `v‡qi K‡i| wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì hyw³, nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi wb‡`©kbv Agvb¨ K‡i mgevq
e¨vs‡Ki eë¯’vcbv KZ©…c¶ ‡`vKv‡bi b~b¨Zg weµq g~j¨ wba©vi‡Y ‡Kv‡bv c`‡¶c ‡bqwb| Zv‡ì AviI `vwe,
g¨v‡bwRs KwgwUi ‡gqv` ‡kl n‡q hvIqvq A‰ea eë¯’vcbv n‡”Q| wiU Av‡e`bKvix 12 bs weev`x hyw³ ‡`Lvb ‡h,
gv‡K©U Kg‡cø‡·i c~e©eZ©x fvovwUqvMY bewbwg©Z fe‡b ‡`vKv‡bi RvqMv eiv‡Ïi AwaKvix bb| c¶¸wj we‡iva
wb®úwËi Rb¨ ¯’vbxq msm` m`m¨‡K wb‡q mfv K‡i Ges 1g, 2q I 3q Zjv c~e©eZ©x fvovwUqv‡ì Rb¨ eivÏ Kivi
wm×všÍ n‡qwQj| nvB‡KvU© wefvM 2016 mv‡ji wiU wcwUkb bs 9797-G iæj wb®úwË K‡i 2016 mv‡ji wiU
wcwUkb bs 14241-G iæj LvwiR K‡i ‡`b| ‡iwR÷«vi I mgev‡qi gnvcwiPvjK‡K we‡iv‡ai c~Y© wbqš¿Y MÖnb,
mKj eivÏ evwZj Ges AMÖvwaKv‡ii wfwË‡Z ‡`vKv‡bi RvqMv eiv‡Ïi wb‡`©k ‡Ìqv nq| ivq cÖvwßi Qq gv‡mi
g‡a¨ e¨vs‡Ki Kvh©µg cwiPvjbvi Rb¨ GKwU KwgwU MVb Ges bewbe©vwPZ KwgwUi Kv‡Q eë¯’vcbv n¯ÍvšÍi Ki‡Z
‡iwR÷«vi I Awa`ßi‡K wb‡`©k ‡Ìqv nq|
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi GB wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× mgevq e¨vs‡Ki c‡ÿ mfvcwZ KyìZ-B-Gjvnx wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi
K‡ib| AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex hyw³ Dc¯’vcb K‡ib †h, wiU Av‡e`bwU AvBbZ APj KviY GLv‡b
we‡ivawU g~jZ c~e©eZ©x fvovwUqv I gvwj‡Ki g‡a¨ wKš‘ Av‡e`bKvix iv‡njv RvwKi c~e©eZ©x fvovwUqv bb| wZwb
18
R‰bK Avjx Bgvg Gi wbKU †_‡K †`vKvbwU µq K‡ib| myZivs Zvi wiU `v‡qi Kivi AwaKvi (Lucas
Standi) †bB| AvBbRxex AviI hyw³ †`Lvb †h, Av`vjZ wiU GLwZqv‡i evwoIqvjv-fvovwUqv m¤ú‡K©i g‡a¨
ga¨¯’ZvKvixi f~wgKv cvjb Ki‡Z cv‡i bv| wiU wcwUkbwU AvBbZ iÿYxq wQj bv Ges 2016 mv‡ji wiU wcwUkb
bs 9797-G nvB‡KvU© wefvM iæj wb®úwË K‡i AvBbMZ fyj K‡iwQ‡jb|
me©‡kl Avwcj wefvM gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h,
Ò...It is an acknowledged fact that numerous criminal cases and civil
suits are pending on the same issues. It is also a well-established legal
principle that civil suits and writ proceedings cannot coexist on the same
issues. According to Article 102 of the People's Republic of
Bangladesh's Constitution, the High Court Division is not permitted to
invoke writ jurisdiction if there is an equally effective remedy available
under the lawÓ
A_©vr ‡h‡nZz GKB Bmÿ‡Z AmsL¨ ‡dŠR`vwi gvgjv Ges ‡Ìqvvwb gvgjv wePvivaxb i‡q‡Q Ges AÎ gvgjvq
Kvh©Ki cÖwZKvi cvIqv m¤¢e, ZvB GKB wel‡q ‡Ìqvwb gvgjv Ges wiU Kvh© aviv mnve¯’vb Ki‡Z cv‡i bv|
MYc«RvZš¿x evsjv‡`‡ki msweav‡bi 102 Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx, GB AvB‡bi Aaxb mgvbfv‡e Kvh©Ki cªwZKvi cvIqv
‡M‡j nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiU GLwZqvvi cÖ‡qvM Ki‡Z cv‡i bv|
6. AMªYx e¨vsK wjwg‡UW ebvg ‡gvt nvwbd ‡kL I Ab¨vb¨ [28 weGjwm (GwW)
68]
-e`wji Av‡`k GKwU cÖkvmwbK Av‡`k hv P¨v‡jÄ Kiv hvq bv Ges kvw¯Í wnmv‡e we‡ePbv Kiv hvq bv|
cÖkvmwbK Avwcj UªvBey¨bvj 2014 mv‡ji cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bvj gvgjv bs 184-G cÖkvmwbK U«vBey¨bvj-1, XvKv
KZ©…K cÖ`Ë 14.12.2015 Zvwi‡Li GKwU ivq I Av‡`k evwZj K‡ib| weev`x cÿ Avwcj UªvBey¨bv‡ji wm×v‡šÍi
weiæ‡× wjf Uy Avwcj Av‡e`b K‡ib|
eZ©gvb Avwc‡ji ‡imcb‡W›U cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bvj-1, XvKvq GKwU Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡ib †h AvwcjKvix KZ…©K
cÖ`Ë 29.04.2014 I 09.10.2014 Zvwi‡Li Av‡`k A‰ea I eva¨Zvg~jK bq| wZwb hyw³ w`‡qwQ‡jb ‡h Zvi
weiæ‡× Am`vPiY Ges Bbwµ‡g›U AvU‡K ivLvi Awf‡hvM G‡b AMÖYx e¨vsK wjwg‡UW Kg©Pvix PvKywi cÖweavbgvjv,
2008 Gi Aax‡b GKwU wefvMxq Kvh©µg ‡bIqv n‡qwQj| ‡imcb‡W›U cwiPvjbv cl©‡` Avwcj Ki‡j wZbwU
Bbwµ‡g›U AvU‡K ivLvi Rwigvbv Kwg‡q GKwU‡Z bvwg‡q Avbv nq Ges e`jx'i Rwigvbv Aby‡gv`b Kiv nq|
‡imcb‡W›U Avwc‡ji wm×v‡šÍi ‰eaZv Ges h_vh_©Zv P¨v‡jÄ K‡i gvgjvwU `v‡qi K‡ib| e¨vsK KZ…©cÿ hyw³
w`‡qwQj ‡h Zv‡K AvZ¥c¶ mg_©‡bi cy‡iv my‡hvM ‡Ìqv n‡qwQj Ges GwU AvBbvbyMfv‡e Av‡ivc Kiv n‡qwQj|
UªvBey¨bvj Awf‡hvM¸wj ¸iæZi Z‡e kvw¯Í mvgvb¨ e‡j g‡b K‡i gvgjvwU LvwiR K‡i ‡`q| ‡imcb‡W›U Avwcj
19
K‡ib Ges Avwcj UªvBeÿbvj Avwcj gÄyi K‡i cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bv‡ji ivq I Av‡`k evwZj K‡i ‡`b| e¨vsK
KZ…©cÿ cÖkvmwbK Avwcj UªvBeybv‡ji Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× GKwU wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi K‡ib|
AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ †KŠïjx hyw³ Zz‡j a‡iwQ‡jb †h, ‡imcb‡W‡›Ui weiæ‡× Awf‡hvM¸wj Z`‡šÍi gva¨‡g
c«gvwYZ n‡qwQj Ges Zv‡K AM«Yx e¨vsK Kg©Pvix PvKywi cÖweavbgvjv, 2008 Abymv‡i kvw¯Í ‡Ìqv n‡qwQj|
cÖkvmwbK Avwcj U«vBeÿbvj g~jZ `yBwU wel‡qi Dci wfwË K‡i cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bv‡ji ivq I Av‡`k evwZj
†NvlYv K‡ib| cÖ_gZ, cÖ_g Z`šÍ AMÖYx e¨vsK Kg©Pvix PvKzwi cÖweavbgvjv, 2008 Gi aviv 46 Abyhvqx Kiv nqwb
Ges wØZxqZ cÖweav‡bi 43(1)(K) †Z e`jx‡K kvw¯Í wn‡m‡e AšÍf‚©³ bv Kiv m‡Ë¡I weev`x‡K kvw¯Íg~jK e`jxi
Av‡`k †Ìqv n‡qwQj Ges GKB Aciv‡ai Rb¨ GKvwaK kvw¯Í Av‡ivc Kiv n‡q‡Q| Gi Rev‡e AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ
weÁ AvBbRxex e‡jb, cÖ_g Z`‡šÍ weev`xi weiæ‡× Awf‡hv‡Mi mZ¨Zv cvIqv hvq| Z‡e wØZxq Z`‡šÍi Av‡M
Awf‡hvMKvixiv Awf‡hvM cÖZ¨vnvi K‡i †bIqvq wØZxq Z`‡šÍ Awf‡hvM cÖgvwYZ nq wb| wZwb AviI †hvM K‡ib
†h, e`jxi Av‡`k GKwU cÖkvmwbK Av‡`k, †Kvb kvw¯Íg~jK Av‡`k bq|
me©‡kl Avwcj wefvM e‡jb ‡h,
Ò..It is true, in the order of punishment besides withholding of one
increment it has been mentioned to transfer the respondent. But there is
no scope to hold the said order of transfer as a punishment. It is an
Administrative order which cannot be challenged and cannot be treated
as a punishment.”
A_©vr e`jxi Av‡`k‡K kvw¯Í wn‡m‡e we‡ePbv Kiv hv‡e bv| GwU GKwU cÖkvmwbK Av‡`k hvi weiæ‡× P¨v‡jÄ Kiv
hv‡e bv Ges kvw¯Í wn‡m‡e we‡ePbv Kiv hv‡e bv|
7. Avbmvi I wfwWwci gnvcwiPvjK I Ab¨vb¨ ebvg ‡gvt iæûj Avwgb I

Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 131]
-nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiU wcwUk‡bi MÖnY‡hvM¨Zvi c‡¶ ivq w`‡jI Gi Av‡M nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi GKwU wWwfkb ‡eÂ
PvKwii kZ©vejx m¤úwK©Z miKvwi Kg©Pvix‡ì wiU wcwUkb MÖnY‡hvM¨ bq g‡g© iæj LvwiR K‡i ‡`b| GgZve¯’vq
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi `ywU wWwfkb ‡eÂ wiU Av‡e`‡bi i¶YxqZvi wel‡q AvB‡bi w`K ‡_‡K ci¯úiwe‡ivax wm×v‡šÍ
‡cŠu‡Q‡Qb| evsjv‡`k mywcÖg ‡KvU© (nvB‡KvU© wefvM) wewagvjv, 1973 Gi mßg Aa¨v‡qi wewa-1 Abyhvqx c~Y©v½
‡e‡Â gvgjv¸‡jv cÖavb wePvicwZi Kv‡Q bv cvwV‡q nvB‡KvU© wefvM AvBbMZ fzj wm×v‡šÍ DcbxZ n‡q‡Q|
1994 mv‡j wewfbœ Avbmvi K¨v‡¤ú we‡`«v‡ni Kvi‡Y Avbmvi e¨vUvwjqb ‡f‡O ‡Ìqv nq| ‡dŠR`vwi gvgjv ‡_‡K
Ae¨vnwZ cvIqvi ci AvBwb cÖwµqv QvovB wiU Av‡e`bKvix Avbmvi‡ì eiLv¯Í Kiv n‡q‡Q| Zviv cÖavbgš¿x,
¯îvó«gš¿x I Avbmv‡ii gnvcwiPvj‡Ki `„wó AvKl©Y K‡ib| ‡dŠR`vwi gvgjvq KZRb Avbmvi m`m¨ RwoZ Ges
Lvjvm I cjvZK m`m¨‡ì we¯ÍvwiZ Z_¨ †P‡q ¯îvóª gš¿Yvjq cÖwZ‡e`b cÖKvk K‡i| cÖwZ‡e`‡b ejv nq, 1994
20
mv‡j wewfbœ Avbmvi K¨v‡¤ú we‡`«v‡ni Kvi‡Y 2 nvRvi 496 Rb Avbmvi m`m¨ RwoZ wQj| GB m`m¨‡ì g‡a¨
20 Rb‡K 1995 mv‡j cybe©nvj Kiv n‡qwQj|
we‡`«v‡ni ci evsjv‡`‡k Avbmvi‡ì cybM©Vb K‡i wewfbœ evwnbx MVb K‡i msm`| we‡`«v‡ni c‡i, GKwU D”P
¶gZvm¤úbœ KwgwU we‡`«v‡ni KviY Z`šÍ K‡i Ges RwoZ e¨w³‡ì wPwýZ K‡i| ¯îvó« gš¿Yvjq we‡`ªv‡n RwoZ
m`m¨‡ì ewn®‹v‡ii Rb¨ Avbmvi gnvcwiPvjK‡K wb‡`©k ‡`q Ges 2 nvRvi 496 Rb m`m¨‡K `vqx wn‡m‡e
wPwýZ Kiv nq|
GB wel‡q wewfbœ mg‡q GKB ai‡bi wKQy wiU Av‡e`bKvix ‡ek K‡qKwU wiU wcwUkb `vwLj K‡iwQ‡jb hv LvwiR
Kiv nq| ‡gvt bRiæj Bmjvg Ges Abïv 1996 mv‡ji 1725 bs wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡ib, ‡gvt dRjy wgqv Ges
Abïv 1996 mv‡ji 789 bs wiU wcwUkb `v‡q K‡ib Ges ‡gvt Kvgiæ¾vgvb Ges Abïv GKBfv‡e 1996 mv‡ji
1727 bs wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡ib Ges nvB‡KvU© wefvM GB g‡g© wiU¸wj LvwiR K‡i †`b †h, miKvix Kg©Pvix‡ì
Zv‡ì cwi‡lev m¤úwK©Z Awf‡hv‡Mi c«wZKv‡ii Rb¨ c«kvmwbK U«vBeÿbv‡ji Kv‡Q ‡h‡Z n‡e| R‰bK ‡ki Avjx
GKB wfwË‡Z XvKvi mnKvix RR Av`vj‡Z 2009 mv‡ji 529 bs UvB‡Uj gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib Ges AvBbZ
AiÿYxq weavq 13.07.2010 Zvwi‡L D³ gvgjv LvwiR n‡q hvq|
eZ©gvb wiU wcwUk‡b nvB‡KvU© wefvM hv‡ì weiæ‡× we‡`ªv‡ni my¯úó Awf‡hvM †bB, hv‡ì weiæ‡× †Kvb †dŠR`vwi
Awf‡hvM †bB Ges hv‡ì kvixwiK wdU‡bm Av‡Q Ges PvKwii eqm Aewkó Av‡Q Zv‡ì PvKwi‡Z envj Kivi
wb‡`©k †`q| GQvovI hv‡ì PvKwii eqm mxgv AwZµg K‡i‡Q Zv‡ì Aem‡ivËi myweav †Ìqvi wb‡`©k †`q|
nvB‡Kv‡U©i Av‡`‡k msÿzä n‡q ‡imcb‡W›U wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi K‡i| Avwc‡j cÖkœ DÌvwcZ nq †h, GKB wel‡q
nvB‡KvU© ci¯úi we‡ivax Av‡`k w`‡Z cv‡ib wK bv? Gwel‡q Avwcj wefvM gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h,
Ò... Rule 1 of Chapter VII of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (High
Court Division) Rules, 1973 (as amended in 2012) has specifically
provided that, if a Division Bench differs from the decision given by
another Division Bench on a point of law, the case shall be referred to
the Chief Justice for decision by the Full BenchÓ
A_©vr GKB wel‡q nvB‡KvU© wefvM ci¯úi we‡ivax Av‡`k w`‡j Zv wm×v‡šÍi Rb¨ gvbbxq cÖavb wePvicwZi wbKU
dzj †eÂ ïbvbxi Rb¨ †cÖiY Ki‡Z n‡e| G‡ÿ‡Î nvB‡KvU© wefvM cÖavb wePvicwZi wbKU bv †cÖi Y K‡i AvBbMZ
fyj wm×všÍ wb‡q‡Q|
8. mv¾v` ‡nv‡mb ebvg ‡gvt jyrdzj nvmvb I Ab¨vb¨| [28 weGjwm (GwW) 321]
-`wÛZ e¨w³i Rvwg‡bi Rb¨ ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 426 I 435 avivq mywbw`©ó weavb i‡q‡Q Ges ‡dŠR`vwi
Kvh©wewai 426(2K) avivq `wÛZ e¨w³i Kiv Rvwg‡bi Av‡e`b hw` LvwiR n‡q hvq, Zvn‡j ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai
435 avivq 'wiwfkbvj GLwZqvi'-Gi AvIZvq cÖwZKvi cvIqv m¤¢e|
21
AÎ gvgjvq weev`x †gvt jyrdzj nvmv‡bi mv‡_ ev`x mv¾v` †nv‡m‡bi eëmvwqK †jb‡`b wQj| weev`x ev`xi wbKU
†_‡K 2,00,00,000/- (`yB †KvwU UvKv) avi †bq Ges avi cwi‡kv‡a 50,00,000/- (cÂvk jÿ) UvKvi PviwU
†PK Bmy¨ K‡i| ‡PK¸wj cieZ©x‡Z Ach©vß Znwe‡ji Kvi‡b wWRAbvi nq Ges ev`x UvKv `vwe K‡i weev`x‡K
wjM¨vj †bvwUk †cÖiY K‡i| wjM¨vj †bvwU‡k †Kvb mvov bv †c‡q ev`x PÆMÖvg weÁ Pxd †g‡UªvcwjUb g¨wR‡óªU
Av`vj‡Z PviwU c„_K gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| weÁ Pxd †g‡UªvcwjUb g¨wR‡óªU Awf‡hvMmg~n Avg‡j wb‡q wePv‡ii
Rb¨ PÆMÖvg weÁ gnvbMi `vqiv RR Av`vj‡Z †cÖib K‡ib| weÁ gnvbMi `vqiv RR Av`vjZ wePv‡ii gvgjv¸wj
Rb¨ PÆMÖvg 5g hyM¥ gnvbMi `vqiv RR Av`vj‡Z †cÖib K‡ib| wePvi PjvKv‡j Awfhy³iv cjvZK wQj| wePv‡i
‡gvt jyrdzj Bmjvg‡K cÖwZwU gvgjvq 1 eQi K‡i webvkªg Kviv`Û I 50,00,000/- (cÂvk jÿ) UvKv Rwigvbv
cÖ`vb K‡i|
Avmvgx †gvt jyrdzj Bmjvg †dŠR`vix Kvh©wewai 426(2K) avivq PÆMÖvg 5g hyM¥ gnvbMi `vqiv RR Av`vj‡Z
Rvwg‡bi cÖv_©bv K‡ib| Av`vjZ Rvwgb Av‡e`b bvgÄyi K‡i| Av`vj‡Zi Av‡`‡k msÿzä n‡q Avmvgx nvB‡KvU©
wefv‡M 561K avivq Av‡e`b K‡i| nvB‡KvU© wefvM †gvt jyrdzj Bmjvg‡K Avwc‡ji k‡Z© 2(`yB) gv‡mi Rvwgb
cÖ`vb K‡i|
nvB‡Kv‡U©i Av‡`‡k msÿzä n‡q ev`x mv¾v` †nv‡mb msweav‡bi 103 Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx wjf Uy Avwcj `v‡qi
K‡ib| AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex e‡jb, nvB‡KvU© wefvM †dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 561K avivq GKRb `wÛZ
Avmvgx‡K Rvwgb cÖ`vb K‡i AvBbMZ fyj K‡i‡Q| `Û cÖ`vbKvix Av`vjZ 426(2K) avivq Rvwgb bv gÄyi Kivi
ci 435 avivq `vqiv R‡Ri wbKU wiwfkb Dchy³ †dvivg wQj| †h‡nZz `wÛZ e¨w³ Dchy³ †dviv‡g wiwfkb K‡i
wb †m‡ÿ‡Î nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M 561K avivq Av‡e`b “corum non judice” n‡q‡Q|
Pampapathy vs State of Mysore, AIR 1967 SC 286 gvgjvq fviZxq mywcÖg †KvU© gšÍe¨ K‡ib
“..It is only if the matter in question is not covered by any specific
provisions of the Code then Section 561A can come into operation.”
GQvovI The Madhu Limaye vs The State of Maharashtra (1977) 4 SCC 551 gvgjvq fviZxq
mywcÖg †KvU© e‡jb
“..That the power is not to be resorted to if there is a specific provision
in the Code for the redress of the grievance of the aggrieved party”
ïbvbx †k‡l Avwcj wefvM gšÍë¨ K‡ib
“..There are specific provisions in sections 426 and 435 of the Code for
bail of a convicted person and if bail petition filed by a convicted person
under 426(2A) of the Code is rejected, then the remedy lies under
Section 435 of the Code in revisional jurisdiction.”
‡h‡nZz `wÛZ e¨w³i Rvwg‡bi Rb¨ ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 426 I 435 avivq mywbw`©ó weavb i‡q‡Q Ges ‡dŠR`vwi
Kvh©wewai 426(2K) avivq `wÛZ e¨w³i Kiv Rvwg‡bi Av‡e`b hw` LvwiR n‡q hvq, Zvn‡j ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai
22
435 avivq 'wiwfkbvj GLwZqvi'-Gi AvIZvq cÖwZKvi cvIqv m¤¢e| nvB‡KvU© wefvM 561K avivq `wÛZ e¨w³‡K
Rvwgb cÖ`vb K‡i Inherent Power of Court Gi fzj cÖ‡qvM K‡i‡Q|
9. Avkivdyj nK (‡gvt) ebvg ‡Pqvig¨vb, `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb I Ab¨vb¨‡ì [75

wWGjAvi (GwW) 7]
-m¤ú` weeiYx‡Z `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb mš‘ó bv n‡j e¨w³i weiæ‡× gvgjv `v‡q‡ii weavb i‡q‡Q| m¤ú` weeiYx
`vwL‡ji Rb¨ Kwgkb ‡Kv‡bv e¨w³‡K evievi ‡bvwUk w`‡Z cv‡i bv|
Av‡e`bKvix GKwU m¤ú` weeiYxi Rb¨ Kwgkb †_‡K cici wZbevi ‡bvwUk ‡c‡qwQ‡jb Ges GKB Kwgkb
Kg©KZ©vi KvQ ‡_‡K `ywU ‡bvwUk ‡c‡qwQ‡jb| Kwgkb mš‘ó bv n‡j gvgjv Ki‡Z cv‡i, wKš‘ evievi m¤ú`
weeiYxi Aby‡iva Ki‡Z cv‡i bv| Kwgk‡bi ‡Pqvig¨vb‡K `vqx Kwgkb Kg©KZ©v‡ì weiæ‡× AvBbx eë¯’v †bIqvi
wb‡`©k w`‡q nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivq evwZj †NvlYv Kiv nq| iv‡qi cÖvmvw½K Ask wb‡P Zz‡j aiv n‡jv:
Ò... If the Commission is not satisfied with wealth statement, there is

provision for filing case against the writ-petitioner, but the Commission
cannot issue repeated notice upon any person for submitting wealth
statement.”
10. nvwmbv Av³vi ebvg Av‡gbv ‡eMg [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 68]
-‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 561 G aviv cÖ‡qvM K‡i wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqvi wb‡Ri Kv‡Q †bIqvi Kivi ¶gZv
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi †bB|
ev`x nvwmbv Av³vi we‡qi cÖ‡jvf‡b al©Y I cÖZviYvi Awf‡hv‡M eZ©gvb weev`xmn cvuPR‡bi weiæ‡× GRvnvi
`v‡qi K‡ib| GRvnv‡i Awfhy³ Kvjvg ‡gvjøv GRvnviKvixi m‡½ mnevm Ki‡j GRvnviKvix AšÍt¯^Ëv n‡q c‡o|
GRvnviKvix Awfhy³‡K we‡qi Rb¨ Pvc w`‡j Awfhy³ Kvjvg ‡gvjøv Ab¨vb¨ Awfhy³K‡ìmn Zv‡K wb‡q GKwU
AvevwmK †nv‡U‡j hvq Ges Zv‡K AvUK K‡i iv‡L| Zvi wPrKv‡i Av‡kcv‡ki †jvKRb cywj‡k Lei w`‡j
Awfhy³iv cvwj‡q hvq| Z‡e cywjk NUbv¯’j †_‡K Avmvgx †mwjbv †eMg‡K nv‡Zbv‡Z AvUK K‡i| Aci Avmvwg
UzUzj cvjv‡bvi mgq 8 Avbv IR‡bi ¯^‡b©i †PBb wQwb‡q wb‡q hvq| cywjk Z`šÍ †k‡l Awfhy³‡ì weiæ‡×
Awf‡hvMcÎ †`q Ges gvgjvwU ewikvj bvix I wkï wbh©vZb `gb UªvBeybv‡j ¯’vbvšÍi Kiv nq| Avmvgx cÿ gvgjvi
Kvh©µg evwZj (quash) Gi Rb¨ nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M Av‡e`b K‡i| UªvBeybvj cÖ_wgK fv‡e Avmvwg‡ì weiæ‡×
Z_¨-cÖgvY †c‡jI nvB‡KvU© wefvM wc WweøD 1 Gi mv‡ÿï Dci wfË K‡i gvgjvi Kvh©µg evwZj (quash)
K‡i| GRvnviKvix nvB‡Kv‡U©i Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi K‡ib|
23
Avwc‡j AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex e‡jb, UªvBey¨bvj Awfhy³‡ì weiæ‡× cÖv_wgK Z_¨ cÖgvY †c‡q‡Q Ges
Zv‡ì weiæ‡× bvix I wkï wbh©vZb `gb AvB‡bi 9(1) aviv I `Ûwewai 326 avivq Awf‡hvM MVb K‡i‡Q|
GRvnviKvix wc WweøD 1 wn‡m‡e Av`vj‡Z mvÿ¨ cÖ`vb K‡i‡Qb| nvB‡KvU© wefvM wc WweøD 1 Gi mvÿ¨ I
†gwW‡Kj wi‡cv‡U©i Dci wfwË K‡i gvgjvi Kvh©µg evwZj (quash) K‡i †`q| wZwb AviI †hvM K‡ib 561K
avivq nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi †Kvb mvÿ¨ g~j¨vqb ev we‡ePbv Kivi my‡hvM †bB| gvgjv PjvKv‡j mvÿ¨ we‡ePbv Kiv
wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqvi| nvB‡KvU© wefvM wc WweøD 1 Gi mvÿ¨ I †gwW‡Kj wi‡cvU© we‡ePbvq wb‡q AvBbMZ
fyj K‡i‡Q| nvB‡KvU© wefvM G‡ÿ‡Î wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqvi Ab¨vqfv‡e AwaKvi K‡i‡Q| AvwcjKvixi
c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex wb‡Pi gvgjvi D×…wZ cÖ`vb K‡ib:
“In the case of Golam Sarwar Hiru vs. The State and another, reported in
13 MLR 103 (AD) “..that neither the High Court Division nor the
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is in favor of entertaining
application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for
quashing of proceedings at the stage when the trial has already begun
and prosecution witnesses are examined.”
“In the case of Habibur Rahman Mollah Vs. the State reported in 62
DLR (AD), 233 “..it is the consistent views of the superior courts of this
subcontinent that the High Court Division which exercising its power
under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure should not usurp
the jurisdiction of the trial Court.”
A_©vr wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqvi Avwcj wefvM ev nvB‡KvU© cÖ‡qvM Ki‡Z cv‡i bv| Avwcj wefvM G wel‡q
gšÍe¨ K‡ib, 561K aviv cÖ‡qv‡M nvB‡KvU© wefvM wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqvi wb‡Ri Kv‡Q wb‡q wb‡Z cv‡i bv|
Avwcj wefvM nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivq evwZj K‡i UªvBey¨bvj‡K AvBb Abyhvqx gvgjv cwiPvjbvi wb‡`©k †`q| iv‡qi
cÖvmw½K Ask wb‡P Zz‡j aiv n‡jv;
ÒThe High Court Division committed serious error in considering the

evidence of P.W.-1 and medical report in exercising the power under
section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure at this stage when the
prosecution yet not completed to adduce its evidence. The High Court
Division has not been empowered to usurp the jurisdiction of the trial
Court invoking section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.Ó
24
11. ‡Zive Avjx ebvg ‰mq` Djøvn [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 233]
-Aa¯Íb Av`vj‡Zi wePviK‡ì AvBb e¨vL¨v Kivi I bwRi ˆZwi Kivi GLwZqvi †bB| eis Zviv we`¨gvb AvBb
cÖ‡qvM Ki‡Z eva¨| Zviv †`‡ki D”P Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍmg~n D×…Z Ki‡Z cv‡i Ges †`‡ki AvB‡bi mv‡_
mvgÄm¨c~Y© we‡`kx Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍ AbymiY Ki‡Z cv‡i|
AÎ †Ìqvwb wjf Uz AvwcjwU 19.05.2014 Zvwi‡L nvB‡KvU© wefvM KZ…©K wmwfj wiwfkb bv¤^vi 3437/2014
Av‡`k I iæj wWmPv‡R©i weiæ‡× `v‡qi Kiv nq| AÎ iæj wWmPv‡R©i gva¨‡g 15.07.2012 Zvwi‡L 2012 mv‡ji
wmwfj wiwfkb bv¤^vi 3 G wm‡jU we‡kl †Rjv R‡Ri wiwfkb evwZ‡ji Av‡`k I wm‡jU wmwbqi mnKvix R‡Ri
11.01.2012 Zvwi‡L 1993 mv‡ji mË¡ Rvwi †gvKvÏgv bv¤^vi 3 G Zvgvw` evwi‡Zi d‡j gvgjv Lvwi‡Ri Av‡e`b
bvgÄy‡ii Av‡`k envj ivLv nq|
AÎ †Ìqvwb wjf Uz Avwc‡ji 1-8 bs †imcb‡W›Uiv ev`x n‡q wm‡jU wmwbqi mnKvix RR Av`vj‡Z 1983 mv‡j
¯^Z¡ †Nvlbv †gvKÏgv bs 22/1983 `v‡qi K‡i Ges 15.04.1989 Zvwi‡L GKcvwÿK wWwµ jvf K‡i|
AvwcjKvix weev`x †Ìqvwb Kvh©wewai Av‡`k 9 iæj 13 †Z GKcvwÿK wWwµ evwZ‡ji Av‡e`b K‡i hv Av`vjZ
bvgÄyi K‡i| †imcb‡W›U gyj wePvwiK Av`vj‡Z 21.10.1993 Zvwi‡L 1993 mv‡ji ¯^Z¡ Rvwi †gvKÏgv bs 3
`v‡qi K‡i| Rvwi †gvKÏgv `v‡q‡ii †ÿ‡Î Zvgvwì †gqv` 3 (wZb) eQi n‡jI G‡ÿ‡Î Zvgvw` DËxb© nIqvi 1
eQi 6 gvm c‡i Rvwi ‡gvKÏgv `v‡qi Kiv nq| ‡gvKÏgvi iÿYxqZvi c‡ÿ wePvwiK Av`vjZ cvwK¯Ívb nvB‡KvU©
wefv‡Mi GKwU wm×všÍ AbymiY K‡i Av‡`k cÖ`vb K‡i (ILR VOL LIV page 1052)|
AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex e‡jb wePvwiK Av`vjZ Rvwi †gvKÏgv Zvgvw` AvB‡bi 182 Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx
evwiZ nIqv m‡Ë¡ ‡gvKÏgvi Kvh©µg cwiPvjbv K‡i AvBbMZ fzj K‡i‡Q| wZwb AviI e‡jb cvwK¯Ívb nvB‡KvU©
wefv‡Mi wm×všÍ evsjv‡`‡ki Av`vj‡Z eva¨Ki bq| GQvovI cvwK¯Ív‡bi Zvgvw` AvBb I evsjv‡`‡ki Zvgvw`
AvB‡bi g‡a¨ †gŠwjK cv_©K¨ i‡q‡Q| wWwµ Rvwii †gvKÏgv evsjv‡`‡ki AvB‡bi 182 Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx n‡jI
cvwK¯Ív‡bi AvB‡b 182 Aby‡”Q` †bB| wWwµ Rvwii †gvKÏgvq cvwK¯Ív‡b 183 Aby‡”Q` I †h wel‡q AvB‡b wbw`©ó
mgqmxgv †bB †m‡ÿ‡Î 181 Aby‡”Q` AbymiY Kiv nq|
‡imcb‡W›U c‡ÿi AvBbRxex nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi Av‡`‡ki c‡ÿ hyw³ Zz‡j a‡ib| Avwcj wefv‡Mi mvg‡b cÖkœ
DÌvwcZ nq †h †h‡nZz evsjv‡`k GKmgq weªwUk fviZ I cieZ©x‡Z cvwK¯Ív‡bi Ask wQj Ges fviZ I
cvwK¯Ív‡bi AvBb I AvBwb AeKvVv‡gv (Legal System) GKB ai‡bi †m‡ÿ‡Î Zv‡ì nvB‡Kv‡U©i wm×všÍ
evsjv‡`‡ki Rb¨ eva¨Ki i‡q‡Q wKbv G cÖm‡½ Av`vjZ evsjv‡`‡ki `yRb weL¨vZ AvBb‡Ái gZvgZ Zz‡j a‡ib|
evsjv‡`k mywcÖg †Kv‡U©i Avwcj wefv‡Mi mv‡eK wePvicwZ KvRx Gev`yj nK Zvi eB ÕbwRi AvBb mswnZvÕ fwjDg
1, c„ôv 3 G e‡jb,
Ó... whether the decisions of the Privy Council, the Indian Federal Court
and the Calcutta High Court during the period before the independence
25
of Pakistan through the partition of India on August 14, 1947 and the
decisions of the Pakistan Federal Court and Supreme Court and Dhaka
High Court on December 16, 1971 i.e. Bangladesh Pre-independence
shall be binding on the courts of Bangladesh. According to the Law's
Continuance Enforcement Order and Article 149 of the Constitution of
Bangladesh, those precedents are binding as common law unless later
overruled by any decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court of Bangladesh or any law enacted by the Legislature. But the
decisions of those courts rendered after those dates shall not be binding
as foreign precedents. They will only be examples that produce
persuasive efficacy.”
A_©vr 14 AvMó 1947 mv‡ji c~‡e© wcÖwf KvDwÝj, BwÛqvb †dWv‡ij †KvU© I KjKvZv nvB‡Kv‡U©i wm×všÍ Ges 26
gvP© 1971 mv‡ji c~‡e© cvwK¯Ívb †dWv‡ij †KvU© I XvKv nvB‡Kv‡U©i wm×všÍmg~n bwRi wn‡m‡e gvbvi evaëvaKZv
i‡q‡Q hw` bv Avwcj wefvM cieZ©x‡Z Abyiƒc wel‡q wfbœ wm×všÍ †`q|
GQvovI evsjv‡`‡ki mv‡eK GUwb© †Rbv‡ij I mywcÖg †Kv‡U©i wmwbqi AvBbRxex gvngy`yj Bmjvg Zvi eB
ÒConstitutional Law of BangladeshÓ (c„ôv 915, 3q ms¯‹iY) e‡jb †h,
... whether the laws declared by the Privy Council, Federal Court and the
Supreme Court of Pakistan before the liberation of Bangladesh are
binding precedents. Because of the then existing constitutional
dispensation the statements of law by these courts formed part of the
corpus juris of this country and were continued as existing laws by
virtue of the Laws Continuance Enforcement Order, 1971 and art. 149 of
the Constitution and are as such binding on the High Court Division and
the subordinate courts until the Appellate Division renders any contrary
decision. The Indian Supreme Court made a distinction between the
principles of substantive law and the principles relating to interpretation
of statutes and opined that the former were continued by the
Constitution but not the latter.' The Indian Supreme Court seems to have
rightly made the distinction and it is submitted that art. 149 of the
Constitution should be deemed to have continued the principles of
26
substantive law laid down by earlier Supreme Courts and Privy Council
as part of the 'existing law'."
A_©vr evsjv‡`‡ki ¯^vaxbZvi c~‡e© cvwK¯Ív‡bi D”P Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍmg~n Ges cvwK¯Ív‡bi ¯^vaxbZvi c~‡e© fviZxq
D”P Av`vjZ Ges wcÖwf KvDwÝ‡ji wm×všÍmg~n we`¨gvb AvBb wn‡m‡e MY¨ n‡e hw` bv GKB wel‡q Avwcj wefvM
wfbœ wm×všÍ w`‡q _v‡K|
Avwcj wefvM gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h cvwK¯Ív‡bi Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍ evsjv‡`‡ki Rb¨ eva¨Zvg~jK bwRi bq| wm‡jU
wmwbqi mnKvix RR cvwK¯Ív‡bi bwR‡ii Dci wbf©i K‡i gvgjvi Kvh©µg cwiPvjbv K‡i AvBbMZ fzj K‡i‡Q|
Av`vjZ AviI e‡jb, Aa¯Íb Av`vj‡Zi wePviKM‡Yi AvB‡bi e¨vL¨v Kiv ev bwRi ˆZix Kivi GLwZqvi †bB,
eis Zviv †`‡ki we`¨gvb AvBb cÖ‡qvM Ki‡e Ges Avgv‡ì ‡`‡ki we`¨gvb bwRi AbymiY Ki‡e| iv‡qi cÖvmw½K
Ask wb‡P Zz‡j aiv n‡jv:
Ò... the Judges of Sub-ordinate Judiciary, as a whole, are not empowered

to interpret laws or making a precedent, rather, are bound to apply
"existing laws" as it is, it is better for them only to cite or rely on the
existing laws and case laws applicable in our jurisdiction and at the
same time refrain from rely on foreign case law, not covered under the
constitutional scheme framed through Article 111 and Article 149 of the
Constitution of BangladeshÓ
12. ivóª ebvg G GBP Gg dzqv` [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 241]

-mvaviYZ mn-Awfhy‡³i ¯^xKv‡ivw³ MÖnY‡hvM¨ bq, Z‡e wKQy e¨wZµg i‡q‡Q ‡hLv‡b GB RvZxq ¯^xKv‡ivw³g~jK
Revbe›`x Av`vjZ‡K GKwU wm×v‡šÍ †cŠQv‡Z mnvqZv K‡i| ZviciI me mv¶¨-cÖgvY MÖnY K‡i ‡Kv‡bv e¨w³‡K
‡`vlx mve¨¯Í I ivq cÖ`v‡bi †ÿ‡Î G wbqg c«‡hvR¨ n‡e|
‡dŠR`vwi wewea gvgjv bs 24677/2022 -G nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi 14.11.2022 Zvwi‡Li ivq I Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡×
wjf Uy Avwcj Kivi Rb¨ ‡dŠR`vwi Av‡e`bwU Kiv n‡q‡Q| nvB‡KvU© wefvM AÎ wewea gvgjvwU‡Z Awfhy³ G
GBP Gg dzqv`‡K Rvwgb cÖ`vb K‡i| cÖv_wgK Z_¨ weeiYx‡Z Awf‡hvM Kiv nq, Awfhy³iv ci¯úi m‡nvì fvB
hviv ‡UÛvi cÖwµqv, Rwg `Lj Ges gv`K eëmv ‡_‡K A‰ea A‡_©i gvwjK n‡q‡Q| Zviv 2008 mvj ‡_‡K XvKvq
GKwU Awdm ¯’vcb K‡i dwi`cyi ‡Rjvi GjwRBwW, weAviwUG, moK I Rbc_ wefvM, ‡cŠimfv, ‡Rjv cwil`,
cvm‡cvU© Awdm, wk¶v I ¯^v¯’¨ ‡m±i mn mKj miKvwi Awd‡mi wbqš¿Y †bq| GQvovI Zviv mvD_ jvBb hvÎx
cwienb bv‡g 23wU ev‡mi gvwjK|
27
wmAvBwWi mnKvix cywjk mycvi 2012 mv‡ji gvwbjÛvwis cÖwZ‡iva AvB‡bi 4(2) avivq XvKvi gyL¨ gnvbMi
nvwKg eivei Awf‡hvMcÎ `vwLj K‡ib| PviRb mn-Awfhy³ h_vµ‡g mv¾v` ‡nv‡mb eiKZ, BgwZqvR nvmvb
iæ‡ej, AvwkKyi ingvb dvinvb I bvRgyj Bmjvg ‡Lv›`Kvi 1898 mv‡ji ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 164 avivq
¯^xKv‡ivw³g~jK Revbew›` cÖ`vb K‡ib Ges cÖ‡Z¨‡KB Revbe›`x‡Z Awfhy³ G GBP Gg dzqv‡ì bvg D‡jøL
K‡ib| Awfhy³ weev`x weÁ we‡kl RR, Av`vjZ bs-10, XvKvi wbKU Rvwgb Av‡e`b Ki‡j Av`vjZ bvgÄyi
K‡ib| IB Av‡`‡k ms¶yä n‡q Avmvwg nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M Rvwg‡bi Av‡e`b Ki‡j nvB‡KvU© wefvM iæj wb®úwË
K‡i Rvwgb gÄyi K‡ib|
ivóªcÿ nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi wm×v‡šÍ msÿzä n‡q wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi K‡ib| Av‡e`bKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ ‡KŠïwj hyw³
Zz‡j a‡ib ‡h, nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi iæj wb®úwË Kivi wm×všÍ cÖ`v‡bi †ÿ‡Î Aciv‡ai ¸iæZ¡ we‡ePbv Ki‡Z e¨_©
n‡q‡Q| wZwb AviI `vwe K‡ib ‡h Awfhy³ weev`x GKRb Af¨vmMZ Acivax Ges hLb c«v³b gš¿x Rbve L›`Kvi
‡gvkviid ‡nv‡m‡bi GwcGm wQ‡jb ZLb †_‡KB wewfbœ Aciv‡a RwoZ, we‡klZ gv`K, Rwg `Lj, A_© cvPvi I
†UÛvievwR| myZivs nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi iæj wb®úwË I Rvwg‡bi wm×všÍ AvBbZ AiÿYxq I evwZj‡hvM¨|
Av`vj‡Z AwZwi³ A¨vUwb© ‡Rbv‡ij e‡jb †h, Awfhy³ weev`xi weiæ‡× PvR©wk‡U mywbw`©ó Awf‡hvM i‡q‡Q Ges
Pvi mn-Avmvwg ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 164 avivq ¯^xKv‡ivw³g~jK Revbew›` w`‡q‡Qb| GB wee…wZ¸wj Awfhy³
weev`x‡K mivmwi A_© cvPv‡ii mv‡_ RwoZ cÖgvY Kivi Rb¨ h‡_ó Ges Zvi weiæ‡× gvwbjÛvwis cÖwZ‡iva AvBb,
2012 (2015 mv‡j ms‡kvwaZ) Gi aviv 4(2) Gi Aax‡b Aciva msNU‡bi Rb¨ GKwU `„p aviYv ‰Zwi K‡i|
Av`vjZ ch©‡e¶‡Y e‡jb †h,
Ò...confessions of a co-accused are generally not admissible, but there are

certain exceptions where such statements could be weighed up in
reaching a verdict. The court has to examine the data available to
determine whether reasonable grounds exist for considering bail in a
particular case. In this case, the High Court Division did not exercise its
discretion by making the Rule absolute and granting bail to the accused
respondent, as it did not consider the well-established proposition of
law.Ó
A_©vr mn-Awfhy³‡ì ¯^xKv‡ivw³ mvaviYZ MªnY‡hvM¨ bq Z‡e wKQy e¨wZµg i‡q‡Q ‡hLv‡b GB ¯^xKv‡ivw³g~jK
Revbe›`x Av`vjZ‡K GKwU wm×v‡šÍ †cŠuQv‡Z mnvqZv Ki‡Z cv‡i| ‡KvbI wbw`©ó gvgjvq Rvwgb cÖ`vb Kivi Rb¨
hyw³m½Z wfwË i‡q‡Q wKbv Zv wba©vi‡Yi Rb¨ Av`vjZ‡K Dcjä Z_¨ cix¶v Ki‡Z n‡e| G‡¶‡Î nvB‡KvU©
wefvM AvB‡bi myc«wZwôZ bxwZ we‡ePbvq bv wb‡q iæj wb®úwË I Awfhy³ weev`x‡K Rvwgb w`‡q Av`vj‡Zi
weP¶YZvi cwiPq †`q wb|
28
nvB‡KvU© wefvM ‡dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 498 avivq Rvwgb gÄy‡ii wba©vwiZ bxwZ D‡c¶v K‡i Avmvwg‡K ‡MªdZv‡ii
ZvwiL ‡_‡K ¯^í mg‡qi g‡a¨ Rvwg‡b gyw³ w`‡q AvB‡bi mywbw`©ó bxwZ js•Nb K‡i‡Q e‡j Avwcj wefvM Av‡`k
cÖ`vb K‡ib I Awfhy³ weev`x G GBP Gg dyqv‡ì Rvwg‡bi Av‡`k evwZj K‡ib|
13. evsjv‡`k weÁvb I wkí M‡elYv cwil` (wewmGmAvBAvi) Gi ‡Pqvig¨vb

ebvg wR Avi Gg Av¯ÍvK ‡gvnvj Lvb Ges Ab¨vb¨ [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 210]
-‡Kvb AvBb e¨vL¨vi †ÿ‡Î mvgwMÖKfv‡e AvBbwUi 'AwfcÖvq', 'D‡Ïk¨' Ges 'bxwZ' we‡ePbv Ki‡Z n‡e|
evsjv‡`k weÁvb I wkí M‡elYv cwil` AvBb, 2013 Gi 12(4) avivq ejv n‡q‡Q, we‡kl ‡gav I ‡hvM¨Zvi
AwaKvix M‡elKMY‡K M‡elYv K‡g© AvK…ó I DrmvwnZ KiY Ges Zv‡ì †gav, `ÿZv I AwfÁZv M‡elYvi Kv‡R
h_vh_fv‡e eënv‡ii j‡ÿ¨ Zv‡ì PvKzwii eqmmxgv 67 (mvZlwÆ) eQi| wiUKvix-‡imcb‡W›Uiv 67 eQi eqm
ch©šÍ PvKwi‡Z envj _vKvi Rb¨ me©‡gvU 13wU (†ZiwU) wiU Av‡e`b K‡ib| wiU Av‡e`bKvixiv 1979 †_‡K
1989 mv‡ji g‡a¨ êÁvwbK Kg©KZ©v wn‡m‡e cÖwZôvbwU‡Z †hvM`vb K‡iwQj| wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì hyw³ wQj Zviv
`xN©w`b M‡elYv Kv‡Ri mv‡_ hy³ Ges M‡elbv Kvh©µ‡gi Rb¨ AmsL¨ cyi®‹vi Zviv †c‡q‡Qb| myZivs 67 eQi
eqm Awã PvKwi Kivi †hvM¨Zv I `ÿZv Zv‡ì i‡q‡Q| GQvovI nvB‡KvU© wefvM aviv 12(4) Gi weavb c~iYK‡í
mvwf©m wewagvjv Lmov Aby‡gv`b K‡i|
nvB‡KvU© wefvM evsjv‡`k weÁvb I wkí M‡elYv cwil` (wewmGmAvBAvi) AvBb, 2013 Gi 12(4) avivi weavb
ev¯Íevq‡bi Rb¨ wiU †imcb‡W›U‡ì wb‡`©k w`‡q iæj wb®úwË K‡i| Gi d‡j wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì Aem‡ii
eqmmxgv 67 eQi nIqv ch©šÍ PvKwi‡Z envj _vKvi AbygwZ ‡Ìqv nq| AvwcjKvix nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wjf Uy
Avwcj ‡P‡q c„_K 13wU ‡Ìqvwb Av‡e`b K‡ib|
AvwcjKvixi c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex hyw³ Zz‡j a‡ib ‡h 12(4) avivq wewmGmAvBAv‡ii M‡elK‡ì Aem‡ii
eqmmxgv 67 eQi gÄyi Kivi Rb¨ `ywU welq ¯úófv‡e ejv n‡q‡Q, we‡kl c«wZfv Ges we‡kl ‡hvM¨Zv| Zviv
AviI e‡jb ‡h nvB‡KvU© wefvM aviv 12(4) mg¯Í weÁvbx‡ì Aem‡ii †ÿ‡Î eva¨Zvg~jK K‡i AvBbMZ fzj
K‡i‡Q| GQvovI nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiU Av‡e`bKvixiv Amvgvb¨ †Kvb M‡elYv Kv‡Ri mv‡_ RwoZ wQ‡jb wKbv ev
AmvaviY ‡hvM¨Zv Ges ‡hvM¨Zvi AwaKvix wKbv Zv we‡ePbv Ki‡Z e¨_© n‡q‡Q | wiU Av‡e`bKvix-
‡imcb‡W›U‡ì Dci PvKwi‡Z envj _vKvi Rb¨ aviv 12(4) †Kvb AvBbMZ ev Awc©Z AwaKvi (legal or
vested right) m„wó K‡i bv|
‡imcb‡W›U c‡ÿ weÁ AvBbRxex e‡jb ‡h, wiU Av‡e`bKvixiv 30 eQ‡iiI ‡ewk mgq a‡i M‡elYv Kv‡R
wb‡qvwRZ wQ‡jb| Zviv Zv‡ì M‡elYv K‡g©i Rb¨ †`kx-we‡`kx AmsL¨ m¤§vbbv I cyi®‹vi †c‡q‡Qb hv Zv‡ì
we‡kl ‡gav I ‡hvM¨Zvi cÖgvY| myZivs AvB‡bi 12(4) avivi weavb Zv‡ì Rb¨ cÖ‡hvR¨| GQvovI wiUKvix‡ì
67 eQi eqm ch©šÍ PvKwi‡Z envj ivLvi wm×všÍ Ab¨vb¨ Kg©KZ©v‡ì 67 eQi ch©šÍ PvKwi‡Z envj _vKvi my‡hvM
†`q bv KviY mK‡ji aviv 12(4) Abyhvqx we‡kl †hvM¨Zv I we‡kl †gav †bB|
29
Avwcj PjvKv‡j miKvi 19.04.2018 ZvwiL ‡_‡K AvBbwU ms‡kvab K‡i aviv 12(4) Gi weavb evwZj K‡i|
Avwcj wefvM Avwcj wb®úwËKv‡j gšÍe¨ K‡i, nvB‡KvU© wefvM GB AvB‡bi e¨vL¨vq
Interpretation of statutes Gi mwVK bxwZ AbymiY K‡iwb| Interpretation of statutes Gi bxwZ
e¨vL¨vq Av`vjZ GKvwaK gvgjvi bwRi I weL¨vZ AvBb we‡klÁ g¨v·I‡q‡ji bxwZ Zz‡j a‡ib|
“In the case of AKM Ruhul Amin vs. District Judge and Appellate
Election Tribunal, Bhola and others reported in 38 DLR (AD) 172 this
Division has held that: It should well be remembered that while
interpreting statutes Judges are not expected to apply pre-conceived
notions nor can they be expected to arrive at the conclusion by
considering the provisions concerned in an isolated or piecemeal
fashion. While construing a statute, its provisions should be considered
as a whole, bearing in mind its object and purpose."
g¨v·I‡qj Zvi weL¨vZ eB Interpretation of statutes (12th Edition, Page 1-2) G e‡jb,
“The function of a Court is to interpret a statute according to the intent

of the legislature, in doing so it must bear in mind that its function is jus
dicere, not jus dare.”
Avwcj wefvM wm×všÍ †`b †h, nvB‡KvU© wefvM AvB‡bi 12(4) avivi cÖK…Z D‡Ïk¨ eyS‡Z e¨_© n‡q‡Q Ges fzj
e¨vL¨v K‡i‡Q| nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiU Av‡e`bKvix‡ì 67 eQi ch©šÍ PvKwi‡Z envj ivLvi wm×všÍ w`‡q AvBbMZ
fzj K‡i‡Q| AvB‡bi cÖvmvw½K Ask wb‡P Zz‡j aiv n‡jv:
Òwe have no hesitation to come to a definite conclusion that the High

Court Division misread and misconstrued the provision of section 12(4)
of the Act of 2013 and thus, came to an erroneous decision in making
the Rule absolute giving direction to implement the said provision by
allowing the writ-petitioners to remain in service till their retirement age
of 67 (sixty-seven) years.Ó
14. ivóª ebvg AwgZ nvmvb [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 113]

Explosive Substance Act, 1968 (we‡ùviK `ªe¨ AvBb) Ges Arms Act, 1878 (A¯¿ AvBb)
AvBbØ‡qi Aaxb `v‡qiK…Z gvgjvi Avmvgx wQ‡jb AwgZ nvmvb| †¯úkvj UªvBey¨bvj, gqgbwmsn weMZ
10/10/2021 Bs Zvwi‡L D³ Avmvgxi Rvwg‡bi Av‡e`b bv-gÄyi K‡ib| D³ Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× Avmvgx nvB‡KvU©
30
wefv‡M wµwgbvj Avwcj bs- 4703/2021 `v‡qi Ki‡j weMZ 16/02/2022 Bs Zvwi‡L nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M D³
Avmvgx‡K AšÍeZ©xKvjxb Rvwgb gÄyi K‡i Av‡`k †`b| ivóªcÿ D³ AšÍeZ©xKvjxb Rvwgb Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× Avcxj
wefv‡M wµwgbvj wgm wcwUkb di wjf Uz Avcxj (wmGgwc) `v‡qi K‡ib| weMZ 28/02/2022 Bs Zvwi‡L
Avcxj wefv‡Mi †P¤^vi RR nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi Rvwgb Av‡`k 6 mßv‡ni Rb¨ ¯’wMZ K‡i Av‡`k †`b| 6 mßvn
†kl nIqvi c~‡e©B ivóªcÿ wbqwgZ (Regular) wµwgbvj wcwUkb di wjf Uy Avcxj (wmwc) `v‡qi Ges
¯’wMZv‡`‡ki †gqv` e„w×i Av‡e`b K‡ib| cieZ©x‡Z D³ wµwgbvj wcwUkb (wmwc) ïbvbxi mgq Avmvgxc‡ÿi
AvBbRxex wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, wmwcwU LvwiR n‡e| KviY Avmvgxcÿ Non-prosecution Kivq weMZ
27/06/22 Bs Zvwi‡L nvB‡KvU© wefvM wµwgbvj AvcxjwU (7403/2022) LvwiR K‡i w`‡q‡Q| GgZve¯’vq,
Avcxj wefvM D‡jøL K‡ib †h,
“It is a general rule of custom or usage practiced in the Appellate

Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and followed through the
year that in any pending petition, file any application within stipulated
time for extension of order of stay passed by the learned Judge-in-
Chamber be regarded as continuation of the stay order passed earlier.”
Avcxj wefvM wm×všÍ †`b †h, Avcxj wefv‡M Awb¯úbœ †Kvb wcwUk‡b (pending petition) hw` ¯’wMZv‡`‡ki
†gqv` e„w×i †Kvb ìLv¯Í `v‡qi Kiv nq Zvn‡j ¯’wMZv‡`‡ki †gqv` ejer (Kvh©Ki) Av‡Q g‡g© a‡i †bqv n‡e|
GwU `xN© mgq a‡i cÖPwjZ GKwU cÖ_v hv cÖ_vMZ AvB‡b (Customary law)cwibZ n‡q‡Q|
D³ gvgjvi Avcxj wefv‡M Av‡iv wm×všÍ †`b †h,
“In the case of a stay order, it prohibits courts below from proceeding
further, as soon as the court has knowledge of the order it is bound to
obey it and if it over not, it not only acts illegally and all proceedings
taken after the knowledge of the order but also all proceedings taken
even without knowledge too would be a nullity in toto.”
Avcxj wefvM nvB‡KvU© wefvM KZ©„K Avcxj Lvwi‡Ri 27/06/22 Bs Zvwi‡Li Av‡`k evwZj K‡i †`b Ges
Avmvgx c‡ÿi AvBbRxex‡K AvcxjwU nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi h_vh_ †e‡Â ïbvbx Ki‡Z wb‡`©k †`b|
15. evsjv‡`k ebvg Ave`yjøvn dviæK [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 139]

AÎ gvgjvq weev`xiv exi‡kÖô b~i †gvnv¤§` wWMÖx K‡jR I Pid¨kb K‡j‡Ri †jKPvivi wn‡m‡e Kg©iZ wQ‡jb|
K‡jR `ywU 2013 mv‡j RvZxqKib Kiv nq| GKB mv‡_ ÔRvZxqKibK…Z K‡jR wkÿK I AwkÿK Kg©Pvix
AvZ¥xKib wewagvjv, 2000Õ Abymv‡i †hvM¨Zvm¤úbœ wkÿK‡ì AvZ¥xKib Kiv nq| weev`xiv AvZ¥xKi‡bi ZvwjKv
†_‡K ev` c‡ob| G‡ÿ‡Î ejv nq †h, 2000 mv‡ji wewagvjv Abyhvqx miKvwi K‡j‡Ri wkÿK nIqvi wkÿvMZ
†hvM¨Zv Zv‡ì †bB| ev` cov wkÿKiv gva¨wgK I D”P gva¨wgK wkÿv‡ev‡W©i cwiPvjK eivei GB `vex K‡ib
31
†h, K‡jR KZ…©c‡ÿi AbygwZ wb‡q Zviv miKvix K‡j‡Ri †jKPvivi c‡Ì Rb¨ cÖ‡qvRbxq wkÿvMZ †hvM¨Zv
AR©b K‡i‡Qb| wkÿv‡ev‡W© †Kvb cÖwZKvi bv †c‡q msÿzä wkÿKiv nvB‡Kv‡U© wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡ib|
weev`x‡ì PvKix †Kb ÔRvZxqKiYK…Z K‡jR wkÿK I AwkÿK Kg©Pvix AvZ¥xKib wewagvjv, 2018Õ Abymv‡i
AvZ¥xKib Kiv n‡e bv g‡g© nvB‡KvU© wefvM iæj wbwk Rvwi K‡ib| nvB‡Kv‡U©i GB iv‡qi weiæ‡× miKvicÿ
Avcxj wefv‡M GKwU jxf Uz Avcxj `v‡qi K‡ib|
Avcx‡j miKvicÿ e‡jb †h, nvB‡KvU© wefvM ÔRvZxqKibK…Z K‡jR wkÿK I AwkÿK Kg©Pvix AvZ¥xKib
wewagvjv, 2018Õ Gi wewa Abyhvqx iæj Rvwi K‡ib| wKš‘ 2018 mv‡ji wewagvjvi wewa 1 Gi Dcwewa 2 Abyhvqx
GB wewagvjv Rvwii ZvwiL ev ZrcieZ©x‡Z RvZxqKibK…Z K‡j‡Ri ‡ÿ‡Î GB weavb cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e| myZivs
weev`xiv GB wewagvjv Abymv‡i †Kvb cÖwZKvi †c‡Z cv‡ib bv| weev`x‡ì 2000 mv‡ji wewagvjvi cwie‡Z© 2018
mv‡ji wewagvjvq cÖwZKvi cÖ`vb K‡i nvB‡KvU© GLwZqvi ewnf‚©Z KvR K‡i‡Q|
Aciw`‡K weev`xc‡ÿi AvBbRxex hyw³ Zz‡j a‡ib †h, hwÌ weev`x‡ì 2000 mv‡ji wewagvjv Abyhvqx wkÿvMZ
‡hvM¨Zv wQj bv wKš‘ Zviv ciewZ©‡Z mggv‡bi wkÿvMZ ‡hvM¨Zv AR©b K‡ib| G‡ÿ‡Î wZwb 2018 mv‡ji
wewagvjvi iæj 12 (2) (L) Zz‡j a‡ib| †hLv‡b ejv n‡q‡Q, mswkøó †Kvb wkÿK ev Kg©Pvixi PvKix AvZ¥xKib
†hvM¨ bv n‡j Ges Zvnv‡ì PvKwi GB wewai Aaxb AvZ¥x‡hvM¨ n‡j G wewagvjv Abyhvqx Zvnv‡ì PvKix
AvZ¥xKib Kiv hv‡e|
`yÕc‡ÿi ïbvbx †k‡l Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib,
 ‡Kvb msÿzä e¨w³ msweav‡bi 102 Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M †Kvb cÖwZKvi cÖv_©bv Ki‡j Zv‡K Aek¨B
mywbw`©ófv‡e cÖwZKvi D‡jøL Ki‡Z n‡e| wKšÍ AÎ wiU wcwUk‡b nvB‡KvU© wefvM †h cÖwZKvi cÖ`vb K‡i‡Q ‡mwU
wiU wcwUk‡b mywbw`©ófv‡e cÖ_©bv Kiv nq wb|
 AÎ wiU wcwUk‡b nvB‡KvU© wefvM weev`x‡ì‡K †jKPvivi wn‡m‡e AvZ¥xKi‡bi Av‡`k cÖ`vb K‡i iæj wbwk‡K
wb®úwË K‡i| A_P iæj wbwk‡Z weev`x‡ì‡K AvZ¥xKib Kiv msµvšÍ †Kvb Av‡`k wQj bv| G‡ÿ‡Î iæj wbwk
Rvwi K‡i nvB‡KvU© wefvM Zvi GLwZqvi ewnf‚©Z KvR K‡i‡Q|
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivq‡K evwZj †Nvlbv K‡i jxf Uz Avcxj wb®úwË K‡ib| Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨
Abyhvqx,
“…The person who wants to invoke Article 102 must be aggrieved and
specify the relief in his prayers. Chapter XIA of the Supreme Court
(High Court Division) Rules, deals with preparing and filing of writ
petition under Article 102 of the Constitution. It provides that the
aggrieved person must specifically set out the relief sought. So, the writ
petitioner must have a specific claim in the form of prayer against such
32
persons who are respondents, following which the Court can grant relief,
if favorable, in accordance with the law.
In the present cases, the High Court Division has delivered the
impugned judgment and order basing on the ÔRvZxqKibK…Z K‡jR wkÿK I
AwkÿK Kg©Pvix AvZ¥xKib wewagvjv,2018Õ rules by which the earlier Rules of
2000 have been repealed and thereby directed the writ respondent-leave
petitioner herein to absorb the writ petitioners-respondents herein as
Lecturers in their concerned Government Colleges despite of the fact
that the writ petitioners did not make any such claim in the form of
prayer in the writ petition asking absorption under the aforesaid
absorption Rules of 2018 nor the Rules Nisi were issued at that effect.
As such, the High Court Division erred in law in traveling beyond the
scope/terms of the Rules Nisi in the writ petitions in giving relief to the
writ petitioners while passing the impugned judgment and order.”
nvB‡KvU© wefvM
1. Aveyj Kv‡kg Ges Ab¨ ebvg AvkdvK Avn‡g` Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023)
HCD 93]
AÎ ‡Ìqvbx gvgjvq ev`x Av`vj‡Zi wbKU GKwU weµq `wjj‡K Rvj I AKvh©Ki ‡NvlYvi Av‡e`b Rvwb‡q
gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| weev`xc‡¶i `vwe Abyhvqx, Zviv 1964 mv‡j GKwU weµq `wj‡ji gva¨‡g ev`xM‡Yi
c~e©cyiæl ‡_‡K bvwjkv f~wg µq K‡iwQj| wKš‘ ev`xc¶ weµq `wjjwU Rvj `vwe K‡ib| eZ©gv‡b RwgwU GKwU
we«K wd‡ìi gva¨‡g Zv‡ì `L‡j Av‡Q| wKš‘ G `vwei c‡¶ `yBRb mv¶xi ‡gŠwLK mv¶¨ e¨ZxZ ‡Kv‡bv `vwjwjK
mv¶¨ Avb‡Z cv‡iwb| Aciw`‡K weev`xc‡¶i `vwe, Zviv wÎk nvRvi UvKvi wewbg‡q RwgwU µq Ges bvgRvwi
K‡iwQj| Zvici ‡_‡K RwgwU Pvlvev‡ì gva¨‡g weev`xc‡¶i `L‡j i‡q‡Q| `L‡ji c«gvY¯î“c weev`xc¶
bvgRvwi LwZqvb, wWwmAvi I LvRbvi iwk` `vwLj K‡ib|
wePvwiK Av`vjZ ev`xi c‡¶ ivq c«`vb K‡ib| Avwcj Av`vjZ wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi ivq‡K cwieZ©b K‡i
weev`xi c‡¶ ivq ‡`b| ev`xc¶ ‡Ìqvbx Kvh©wewa, 1908 Gi 115 bs aviv Abyhvqx nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wiwfkb
33
`v‡qi K‡ib| nvB‡KvU© wefvM Avwcj Av`vj‡Zi ivq envj ‡i‡L e‡jb, Av‡jvP¨ `wjjwUi m¤úv`b, ‡iwR‡÷&©ekb
Ges mve-‡iwR÷vi KZ©…K Aby‡gv`b mewKQyB ‡iwR‡÷«kb A¨v±, 1908 Gi 31, 32, 34, 35, 52, 58, 59
Ges 60 aviv Abyhvqx m¤úvw`Z n‡q‡Q| h_vh_ ‡iwR‡÷«k‡bi d‡j weµq `wj‡ji c‡¶ kw³kvjx AvbygvwbK
cªgvY (Presumptive Evidence) m„wó n‡q‡Q| ev`xc¶ cªgvY LÐb Ki‡Z e¨_© n‡q‡Qb| wb‡gœ iv‡qi cªvmw½K
Ask Zy‡j aiv n‡jv-
It appears that the whole proceeding in regards execution and

registration of the deed in question and endorsement of the Sub-
Registrar therein as provided under sections 31, 32, 34, 35, 52, 58, 59
and 60 of the Registration Act, as stated above, were done in accordance
with those provisions of the Act and the document achieved strong
presumptive evidence as to its due registration. Accordingly, burden was
upon the plaintiffs to rebut such evidence by adducing strong evidence
to prove that the deed in question was a product of forgery. But the
plaintiffs failed to discharge the onus.
nvB‡KvU© wefvM Av‡iv wm×všÍ †`b †h, G gvgjvwU c¶‡`v‡l `zó| †Kbbv wee`gvb Rwgi g‚j gvwjK hviv wQ‡jb,
Zviv cÖ‡Z¨‡K GKvwaK DËivwaKvix †i‡L †M‡Qb| DËivwaKvixiv mevB G Rwgi mn-Askx`vi| wKš‘ AÎ gvgjvq
c¶ wn‡m‡e Zv‡ì AšÍf©z³ Kiv nqwb| GQvovI ev`xi AviwR Abzhvqx, G Rwgi wKQz Ask miKvi Lvm Rwg
wn‡m‡e AwaMÖnY K‡i‡Q| ev`xc¶ †Kv‡bv `wjj QvovB mn-Askx`vi‡ì Rwgi Ask Ges miKvwi Lvm Rwg Avjv`v
bv K‡i m¤ú‚Y© As‡k wb‡Ri gvwjKvbv `vwe K‡i‡Q| ZvB nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi g‡Z, ev`xc‡¶i DwPZ wQj ïiæ‡Z
wb‡Ri ¯^Z¡ cÖgvY Kiv| †Kv‡bv Rwgi mË¡ bv _vK‡j H Rwg mswkøó weµq`wjj Rvj †NvlYvi Rb¨ gvgjv Kiv hvq
bv| ZvB ev`xM‡Yi c‡¶ ivq †`qvUv wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi fzj wQj| Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ wbgœiƒc-
Moreover, plaintiff No.1 claimed title to the suit land without

ascertaining his share therein. As per claim of the plaintiffs .08 acre suit
land was acquired by the Government and there were other co-sharers in
the suit land. In such situation the plaintiffs are not entitled to claim title
to the entire suit land. Accordingly, I am of the view that the plaintiffs
could not prove title to the suit land but the trial Court without
ascertaining the title of the plaintiffs decreed the suit….. it has been held
that the plaintiff is not entitled to a simple declaration that the
34
appellant’s kabala is false and fraudulent without first establishing his
title to the suit land (1991 BLD (AD) 101).
nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiwfk‡bi mg‡q KZUzKz ¶gZv cÖ‡qvM Ki‡Z cvi‡e, †m cÖm½I iv‡q D‡V Av‡m| wiwfkbvj †KvU©
wn‡m‡e nvB‡KvU© wefvM ïay iv‡qi AvBwb w`K¸‡jvi h_v_©Zv hvPvB Ki‡e| †Kv‡bv mv‡¶ï MÖnY‡hvM¨Zvi e¨vcv‡i
wbgœ Av`vj‡Zi wm×v‡šÍ n¯Í‡¶c Kivi AwaKvi nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi †bB| Z‡e nvB‡KvU© wefvM wbgœ Av`vj‡Zi ivq
cwieZ©b Ki‡Z cvi‡e, hLb (1) iv‡q GKwU ¸iæZ¡c~Y© mv¶¨ we‡ePbv Kiv nqwb A_ev mv¶¨‡K wePviK fzjfv‡e
ey‡S‡Qb, A_ev (2) Ggb mv‡¶ï Dci wbf©©i K‡i ivq †`qv n‡q‡Q hvi AvBwb g~j¨ †bB Ges G mv¶¨‡K we‡ePbv
Kiv bv n‡j ivqwU wfbœ n‡Zv, A_ev (3) wbgœ Av`vjZ AvBwb †Kv‡bv fzj Kivi d‡j Ggb wm×v‡šÍ G‡m‡Qb, hvi
d‡j b¨vqwePvi evavMÖ¯Í n‡q‡Q, A_ev (4) Ggb †Kv‡bv wm×v‡šÍ G‡m‡Qb hv mv‡¶ï mv‡_ mvgÄm¨cyY© bq, A_ev
(5) wbgœ Av`vj‡Zi iv‡q ¯úóZ AvBwb fzj bR‡i c‡o (On the face of the record)| wb‡gœ Av`vj‡Zi
fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv n‡jv-
The High Court Division while exercising its revisional jurisdiction is

competent to reverse the judgment of the courts below when the same
has been made either upon misreading or non-consideration of the
material evidence caused failure of justice; or when the same has been
passed on the basis of evidence which cannot be considered as legal
evidence and had the same been not taken into consideration the
judgment would not have been one as has been made; or when the
appellate Court in giving a particular finding has committed any error of
law resulting in an error in the decision occasioning failure of justice or
such finding is found to have resulted from glaring misconception of
law; or when the findings arrived at by the appellate Court is contrary to
the evidence; or when there appears error of law apparent on the face of
the record occasioning failure of justice.
2. ‡gv: kvwnb BKevj ebvg †Rbv‡ij mvwU©wd‡KU Awdmvi Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB
(2023) HCD 168]
GB gvgjvq wcwUkbvi Zvi dvwb©Pvi eëmvi Rb¨ AMÖYx e¨vsK †_‡K AvovB j¶ UvKv FY MÖnY K‡ib| wbw`©ó
mg‡qi g‡a¨ FY cwi‡kva bv Kivq e¨vsK UvKv Av`v‡qi Rb¨ †Rbv‡ij mvwU©wd‡KU Awdmv‡ii wbKU 4,16,756
UvKv cvIbv Av`v‡qi Rb¨ wiKzBwRkb dg© Rgv †`b| †Rbv‡ij mvwU©wd‡KU Awdmvi mvwU©wd‡KU gvgjvi Kvh©µg
35
ïiæ K‡ib| wZwb mvwU©wd‡KU-‡`bv`vi‡K (Certificate-debtor) gvwmK 5 nvRvi UvKv K‡i FY cwi‡kv‡ai
Av‡`k †`b| Gfv‡e wKw¯Í‡Z wcwUkbvi me UvKv †kva K‡ib| 2016 mv‡j AMÖYx e¨vsK wcwUkbv‡ii wbKU Av‡iv
5,07,766 UvKv cvIbv `vwe K‡i| GB NUbvi †cÖw¶‡Z wcwUkbvi nvB‡Kv‡UiÖ Øvi¯’ nb|
wcwUkbv‡ii c¶ †_‡K hzw³Z‡K© ejv nq, A_©FY AvBb, 2003 cvk nIqvi ci miKvwi Avw_©K cÖwZôv‡bi †Kv‡bv
cvIbv Av`v‡qi Rb¨ Public Demands Recoverz Act, 1913 Aax‡b mvwU©wd‡KU gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv hv‡e
bv| wKš‘ Av`vjZ A_©FY AvBb, 2003 Gi 5(5) bs aviv ch©v‡jvPbv K‡i e‡jb, D³ aviv Abzhvqx 5 j¶ UvKvi
wb‡Pi cvIbv Av`v‡qi Rb¨ A_©FY Av`vj‡Z gvgjv Kiv hv‡e A_ev mvwU©wd‡KU gvgjvI Kiv hv‡e| AvBb Dfq
my‡hvM i‡q‡Q| ZvB mvwU©wd‡KU gvgjvwU‡Z †Kv‡bv GLwZqviMZ µwU †bB| iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wbgœiƒc-
On meticulous and meaningful reading of the aforesaid provision of the

Ain, 2003, it is as clear as day light that the legislature has consciously
given option for shopping the forum either to file Artha Rin Suit or
Certificate Case for speedy realization of the outstanding amount which
does not exceed Tk. 5 lacs. The jurisdiction of the Certificate Officer is
in addition but not in derogation to the jurisdiction of the Artha Rin
Adalat; therefore, the certificate proceeding does not suffer from
jurisdictional defect raised by the petitioner.
Z‡e Av`vjZ mvgwMÖKfv‡e wcwUkbv‡ii c‡¶ ivq †`b| Av`vj‡Zi g‡Z, PDR AvB‡bi 16 aviv Abzhvqx
mvwU©wd‡KU gvgjvi gva¨‡g `vweK…Z A‡_©i Dci gvgjv PjvKvjxb my‡ì nvi n‡e mv‡o Qq kZvsk| wKš‘ AÎ
gvgjvq wewfbœ mgq wewfbœ nv‡i mz` aiv n‡q‡Q| m‡e©v”P mz‡ì nvi aiv n‡q‡Q mv‡o 14 kZvsk| ZvB Av`vjZ
e¨vs‡Ki †`qv mz‡ì wnmve ch©‡e¶Y K‡i GwU‡K A‰ea I A‡hŠw³K AvL¨vwqZ K‡ib| Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb,
PDR AvB‡bi Aax‡b †Kv‡bv gvgjv PjvKvjxb `vweK…Z A‡_iÖ Dci avh©K…Z mz` wba©viY n‡e PDR AvBb
Abzhvqx, G‡¶‡Î A_©FY AvBb, 2003 Gi 50 bs aviv cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e bv| iv‡qi g~j fvl¨ Zz‡j †`qv n‡jv-
In a Certificate Case, the provision of section 50 of the Ain, 2003 so far

it relates to interest, profit cannot be applicable rather the provision of
section 16 and 45 of the PDR Act shall apply, otherwise it will frustrate
the purpose of empowering the Certificate Officer in disposing
Certificate Case filed by FIs for recovery of a small amount not more
than Tk. 5 lacs
36
GB iv‡q Av`vjZ evsjv‡`k e¨vsK‡KI Avw_©K cÖwZôvb¸‡jvi my ‡ì wnmve LwZ‡q †`Lvi wb‡`©k †`b| Av`vjZ
e‡jb, my‡ì nvi wba©viY GKwU `yiƒn welq| A‡bK mgq †`Lv hvq, e¨vsK Kg©KZ©viv AvšÍwiKZv Ges mZK©Zvi
mv‡_ mz` wnmve K‡ib bv| ZvB e¨vsK †Kv¤úvwb AvBb, 1991 Gi 45 I 49 bs avivq cÖ`Ë ¶gZvbzmv‡i
evsjv‡`k e¨vs‡Ki DwPZ mg‡q mg‡q Avw_©K cÖwZôvb¸‡jvi my` wnmvec×wZ Z`viwK Kiv| wb‡gœ iv‡qi mswkøó
Ask Zz‡j aiv n‡jv-
Experience shows that the calculation of interest is a very challenging

job and at times, we find that the Bank officials are not so vigilant and
not so diligent in calculating interest; therefore, Bangladesh Bank should
exercise its power as embodied under section 45 and 49 of the Bank
Company Ain, 1991 to inspect the case as to the calculation of interest
by FIs at least on random basis. Bangladesh Bank should examine as to
whether the interest calculated is in accordance with law or not. Mere
denial or no objection as to calculation of interest by the borrower does
not ipso facto give validity of the statement as to interest.
me©‡kl Av`vjZ mvwU©wd‡KU Awdmv‡ii wbKU Pjgvb _vKv gvgjvwU evwZj K‡i †`b| †Kbbv PDR
AvB‡bi 2bs Zdwm‡ji 1bs iæj Abzhvqx wiKzBwRkb dg©wU e¨vs‡Ki g¨v‡bRvi KZ©…K †fwidv‡qW wQj bv|
ZvB gvgjvwU †Mvuov‡ZB A‰ea Ges wfwËnxb|
3. wmwfj wewea ‡idv‡iÝ bs 11/2022 [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 8]
AÎ iv‡q weÁ Av`vjZ cve©Z¨ ‡Rjv ev›ìev‡bi AwZwi³ ‡Rjv RR-Gi cvVv‡bv `ywU AvBwb cª‡kœi wb®úwË
K‡ib| ‡Ìqvwb Kvh©wewa, 1908 Gi 113 ‡mKkb Abyhvqx G ‡idv‡iÝwU cvVv‡bv nq| cªkœ`ywU wQj,
(1) cve©Z¨ PÆMªvg (ms‡kvabx) ‡i¸‡jkb, 2003 Abyhvqx PÆM«vg wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU wb®úwËi Rb¨
A‡c¶gvb ‡Ìqvwb gvgjvi Avwcj¸‡jv wK be-MwVZ cve©Z¨ ‡Rjv RR Av`vj‡Z U«vÝdvi Kiv n‡e wKbv? Ges
(2) hw` UªvÝdvi Kiv nq, Zvn‡j ‡m¸‡jv AÎ Av`vj‡Z wb®úwË Kiv hv‡e wKbv?
we«wUk Avgj ‡_‡K 2008 mvj ch©šÍ cve©Z¨ PÆM«vg ‡i¸‡jkb, 1900 Abyhvqx cve©Z¨ PÆM«v‡g wePviKvh© cwiPvwjZ
n‡Zv| GLvbKvi wePviKvVv‡gv ‡`‡ki Ab¨vb¨ ‡Rjv A‡c¶v wfbœ wQj| cve©Z¨ PÆMªv‡gi ‡dŠR`vwi I ‡Ìqvwb
gvgjv¸‡jvi wb®úwË Ki‡Zb mswkøó ‡Rjvi ‡WcywU Kwgkbvi| ‡mLvb ‡_‡K D™¢yZ Avwcj¸‡jv ‡hZ wefvMxq
Kwgkbvi wKsev AwZwi³ wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU| wKš‘ GB ‡i¸‡jk‡b 2003 mv‡j GKwU ms‡kvabx Avbv
37
nq| GB ms‡kvabx Øviv me¸‡jv cve©Z¨ ‡Rjvq ‡dŠR`vwi Ges ‡Ìqvwb Av`vjZ MwVZ nq| ms‡kvwaZ AvB‡bi 6
bs aviv Abyhvqx ‡WcywU Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU wb®úwËi Rb¨ A‡c¶gvb ‡dŠR`vwi gvgjv I ‡Ìqvwb gvgjv¸‡jv Ges
wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU wb®úbœvaxb ‡dŠR`vwi Avwcj¸‡jv ‡Rjv Av`vj‡Z ¯’vbvšÍi Ki‡Z n‡e| AvB‡b wefvMxq
Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU wb®úbœvaxb ‡Ìqvwb Avwc‡ji e¨vcv‡i wKQy ejv nqwb| wKš‘ ev›ìevb ‡Rjvi ‡WcywU Kwgkbvi
Ges PÆMªvg ‡Rjvi wefvMxq Kwgkbvi wb®úbœvaxb mKj ‡Ìqvwb I ‡dŠR`vwi gvgjv beMwVZ ‡Rjv Av`vj‡Z
cvwV‡q ‡`b| ZvB ev›ìev‡bi AwZwi³ ‡Rjv R‡Ri Av`vj‡Z cªkœ ‰Zwi nq, D³ Av`vjZ wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii
cvVv‡bv ‡Ìqvwb Avwcj¸‡jv wb®úwË Ki‡Z cvi‡e wKbv?
G mgm¨v mgvav‡b gnvgvb¨ nvB‡KvU© wefvM e‡jb, ms‡kvwaZ AvB‡bi 6 avivi Aax‡b we‡kl weav‡bi ‡¶‡Î
AvBbcª‡YZviv ‡Kv‡bv fyj K‡ibwb| Zviv m‡PZbfv‡eB wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU wb®úbœvaxb ‡Ìqvwb
Avwcj¸‡jvi e¨vcv‡i wKQy D‡jøL K‡ibwb| D‡jøL bv Kivi GKvwaK m¤¢ve¨ KviY _vK‡Z cv‡i| A¨vwgKvm
wKDwi‡ì g‡Z, nq‡Zvev AvBbcª‡YZv‡ì D‡Ïk¨, ‡h‡nZy wbe©vnx wefv‡Mi GKRb Kg©KZ©v (‡WcywU Kwgkbvi)
‡Ìqvwb gvgjvwU wb®úwË K‡i‡Qb, ZvB G wefv‡MiB ‡Kv‡bv D”Pc`¯’ ‡Kv‡bv Kg©KZ©v G gvgjvi Avwcj ‡kvbv
DwPZ| ZvQvov cve©Z¨ PÆMªvg (ms‡kvabx) ‡i¸‡jkb, 2003 Gi 8(5) aviv Abyhvqx ‡Rjv RR Av`vjZ‡K hyM¥
‡Rjv RR Av`vj‡Zi ‡Ìqvwb gvgjvi Avwcj ‡kvbvi GLwZqvi ‡`qv n‡q‡Q| wKš‘ ‡WcywU Kwgkbv‡ii Øviv
wb®úwËK…Z gvgjv ‡kvbvi GLwZqvi ‡`qv nqwb| ZvB wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii wbKU wb®úbœvaxb ‡Ìqvwb Avwcj¸‡jv
‡Rjv RR Av`vj‡Z cvVv‡bv AvB‡bi j•Nb| wb‡gœ iv‡qi mswkøó Ask Zy‡j aiv n‡jv-
One of such reasons, as suggested by learned advocates, may be that the

civil disputes from which the said appeals arose were originally
disposed of by an executive, namely the Deputy Commissioner of the
respective district. Therefore, it was thought within the wisdom of the
Legislature that those should be disposed of by the Divisional
Commissioner of Chattogram, another executive in the same hierarchy,
as before. On the other hand, since added subsection (5) of Section 8 of
the Regulation does not confer any appellate jurisdiction on the District
Judge of the hill districts to hear appeals arising out of an order or
judgment of the Deputy Commissioners, no question arises as to the
transfer of the said pending civil appeals and proceedings.
cwi‡k‡l gnvgvb¨ nvB‡KvU© wefvM wefvMxq Kwgkbv‡ii Kvh©vjq †_‡K iv½vgvwU, LvMovQwo I ev›ìev‡bi †Rjv
R‡Ri Av`vj‡Z cvVv‡bv †Ìqvwb Avwcj¸‡jv cybivq wefvMxq Kvh©vj‡q †diZ cvVv‡bvi wb‡`©k †`b| Z‡e †h
38
gvgjv¸‡jv B‡Zvg‡a¨ †Rjv RR Av`vj‡Z wb®úwË Kiv n‡q‡Q, †m¸‡jvi †¶‡Î †Rjv RR Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍB
P‚ovšÍ e‡j a‡i †bqv n‡e| †m¸‡jv †diZ cvVv‡bvi cÖ‡qvRb †bB|
4. wmivRyj nK nvIjv`vi Ges Ab¨ ebvg Ry‡jLv †eMg Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB
(2023) HCD 199]
AÎ gvgjvq ev`x wKQz †nev `wjj Ges Ac©Ybvgv‡K Rvj †NvlYvi Rb¨ †Ìqvwb Av`vj‡Z AvwR© Rvbvb| ev`xi
`vwe Abzmv‡i, ev`x Ges weev`xMY Avcb fvB‡evb| Zv‡ì wcZv iæ¯Íg nvIjv`vi †kl Rxe‡b weev`xM‡Yi mv‡_
emevm Ki‡Zb| Zvi g…Z¨zi 20 eQi c‚‡e© wZwb AÜ n‡q hvb| A‡bï mvnvh¨ Qvov Pjv‡div Ki‡Z cvi‡Zb bv|
Zvi G KiæY Ae¯’vi my‡hvM wb‡q weev`xMY Rvj †nev `wj‡ji gva¨‡g iæ¯Íg nvIjv`v‡ii mg¯Í m¤úwË wb‡Ri bv‡g
K‡i †bq| Aciw`‡K weev`xi `vwe Abymv‡i, †kl Rxe‡b weev`xM‡Yi †mevh‡Zœ Lywk n‡q iæ¯Íg nvIjv`vi †nev
`wj‡ji gva¨‡g Zvi weczj m¤úwËi GKvsk `vb K‡ib| wZwb ZLb AÜ wKsev kh¨vkvqx wQ‡jb bv| eis Kw_Z
ÔAmy¯’ve¯’vqÕ wZwb ¯’vbxq GKwU ¯‹z‡ji mfvcwZi `vwqZ¡ cvjb K‡iwQ‡jb, we‡qi Abzôv‡b mv¶x wn‡m‡e wQ‡jb Ges
†Kv‡U© GKvwaK gvgjv cwiPvjbv K‡iwQ‡jb| weev`x G `vwei ¯^c‡¶ `vwjwjK cÖgvY `vwLj K‡ib| ïbvbx †k‡l
hyM¥ †Rjv RR Av`vjZ ev`xi c‡¶ wWwµ cÖ`vb K‡ib|
Avwc‡j nvB‡KvU© wefvM wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi ivq cwieZ©b K‡i weev`xi c‡¶ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib| ev`xc‡¶i
AvBbRxexi GKwU †Rviv‡jv hzw³ wQj †h, 1 bs weev`x gvgjvi ¸iæZ¡c‚Y© mv¶x nIqv m‡Ë¡I Av`vj‡Z Dcw¯’Z
nbwb| mv¶¨ AvBb, 1872 Gi 114 aviv Abzmv‡i Zvi G ai‡bi Abzcw¯’wZ ev`xi `vwei mZ¨Zvi c‡¶ Abzgvb
(Presumption) ˆZwi K‡i| wKš‘ Av`vjZ e‡jb, 1bs weev`x Zvi ¯¿x‡K cvIqvi Ad GUwb©i gva¨‡g mv¶¨
cÖ`v‡bi AbygwZ cÖ`vb K‡ib| mv¶¨ AvB‡bi 120 aviv Abzmv‡i, ¯^vgxi cwie‡Z© ¯¿x Ges ¯¿xi cwie‡Z© ¯^vgx mv¶¨
cÖ`vb Ki‡Z cv‡i| ZvB 1bs weev`xi Abycw¯’wZ weev`xi wec‡¶ †Kv‡bv ai‡bi Abygvb (Presumption) ˆZwi
K‡ibv|
Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb, mv¶¨ AvBb, 1872 Gi 101 Ges 103 aviv Abymv‡i, iæ¯Íg nvIjv`v‡ii Amy¯’Zv Ges †nev
`wj‡j _vKv Zvi ¯^v¶i Rvj cÖgv‡Yi `vqfvi wQj ev`xi Dci| ev`xc¶ cÖgvY Ki‡Z e¨_© n‡q‡Qb †h, †nev
`wj‡j _vKv ¯^v¶i Z…Zxq †Kv‡bv e¨w³i, iæ¯Íg nvIjv`v‡ii bq| Zvi Amy¯’Zvi c‡¶I †Rviv‡jv cÖgvY cvIqv
hvqwb| ZvB ev`xc‡¶i `vwe wfwËnxb| AvBb Abzmv‡i, `wj‡j _vKv ¯^v¶‡ii mZ¨Zv cÖgv‡Yi `vwqZ¡ weev`xi bq|
eis ev`x hLb ¯^v¶i‡K Rvj cÖgvY Ki‡Z m¶g nq, ïaz ZLbB Zvi `vwe LÐb Kivi `vqfvi weev`xi Dci
eZ©vq| wb‡gœ iv‡qi mswkøó Ask †`qv n‡jv-
According to the provisions laid down in sections 101 and 103 of the
Evidence Act, the entire onus was upon the plaintiffs to prove that the
signatures given by Rustom Howlader in all the documents are false
39
because it is their specific case that Rustom Howlader never appeared in
public due to his serious ailment and indisposition and blindness and
even he was to be taken to the toilet by somebody else and remained bed
ridden from 1980 until his death. Plaintiffs had to take resort to expert
opinion in order to discharge their initial onus under section 101 of the
Evidence Act to prove that those impugned documents were executed
not by Rustom Howlader but by an imposter with a scheme to grab the
property and Rustom Howlader was completely unable to perform his
own affairs due to his serious illness. Law says when the initial onus is
discharged by the plaintiff the onus then shifts upon the defendants to
show the contrary.
5. ivóª ebvg `zb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 40]
‡WczwU GUwb© †Rbv‡ij Rbve Avwgb DÏxb ˆ`wbK BbwKjv‡e cÖKvwkZ GKwU msev` cÖwZ‡e`b Ò`zb©xwZ `g‡b Ô`z`K
÷vBjt wek †KvwU‡Z cÖ‡KŠkjx Avkivdz‡ji `vqgyw³Ó Gi e¨vcv‡i Av`vj‡Zi `„wó AvKl©Y K‡ib| Av`vjZ
¯^cÖ‡Yvw`Z n‡q (Suo Moto) iæj Rvwi K‡i `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgk‡bi †Pqvig¨vb‡K G e¨vcv‡i e¨vL¨v cÖ`vb Kivi
Av‡`k †`b| GKB mv‡_ cÖKvwkZ msev‡ì mZ¨Zvi wel‡q cÖwZ‡e`b `vw‡L&ji wb‡`©k †`b| GQvovI cÖKvwkZ
cÖwZ‡e`‡bi mvsevw`K‡K Zvi msev‡ì Drm (Disclosure of Source) `vwLj Ki‡Z e‡jb|
iæj ïbvbx‡Z `z`K Ges cÖ‡KŠkjx Avkivdz‡ji c‡¶ wbhz³ AvBbRxexMY cÖKvwkZ cÖwZ‡e`b‡K wg_¨v I
D‡Ïk¨cÖ‡Yvw`Z `vwe K‡i mvsevw`‡Ki kvw¯Í `vwe K‡i| mvsevw`K ˆmq` Avn‡g‡ì c‡¶ GW‡fv‡KU wkwki gwbi
e‡jb, ˆmq` Avn‡g` GKRb †R¨ô mvsevw`K| wZwb `xN© 30 eQi a‡i mzbv‡gi mv‡_ mvsevw`KZv †ckvq Av‡Qb|
Av‡jvP¨ cÖwZ‡e`b cÖKv‡ki gva¨‡g wZwb g‚jZ `z`‡Ki Kv‡R mnvqZv K‡i‡Qb| Z‡_ï Drm cÖKvk cÖm‡½ wg.
Avng‡ì AvBbRxex e‡jb, Z‡_ï Drm GKRb mvsevw`‡Ki e¨w³MZ m¤úwË| mviv we‡k¦B Z_¨cÖKvkKvixi
wbivcËv wbwð‡Zi Rb¨ †MvcbxqZv eRvq ivLvi ixwZ i‡q‡Q| ZvB GKRb mvsevw`K‡K Z‡_ï Drm cÖKv‡ki Rb¨
eva¨ Kiv hv‡e bv|
ïbvbxA‡šÍ gnvgvb¨ nvB‡KvU© wefvM we`¨gvb AvBb Ges †`wk-we‡`wk bwRi ch©v‡jvPbv K‡i ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib|
iv‡q Av`vjZ e‡jb, evsjv‡`‡ki AvBb Abzhvqx GKRb mvsevw`K Zvi Z‡_ï Drm cÖKvk Ki‡Z eva¨ bq| AvBb
G e¨vcv‡i Zv‡K myi¶v w`‡q‡Q| Rb¯^v_© mswkøó Z_¨ cÖKvk myi¶v AvBb, 2011 Gi aviv 5(1) G ejv Av‡Q,
†Kv‡bv Z_¨ cÖKvkKvix (Whistleblower) hw` †Kv‡bv wbfiÖ‡hvM¨ Z_¨ cÖKvk K‡i, Zvn‡j Zvi AbzgwZ e¨ZxZ
cwiPq cÖKvk Kiv hv‡ebv| `zb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb AvBb, 2004 Gi aviv 2(L) †Z ejv n‡q‡Q, †Kv‡bv mv¶x‡K
40
Av`vj‡Z Zvi Z_¨`vZvi bvg cÖKv‡k eva¨ Kiv hv‡e bv| A_ev Ggb †Kv‡bv Z_¨ cÖKv‡k eva¨ Kiv hv‡e bv hv‡Z
Z_¨`vZvi bvg cÖKvk n‡q c‡o| Av`vjZ fviZxq mzwcÖg †Kv‡UiÖ GKwU ivq D‡jøL K‡ib (Manohar Lal
Sharma vs. Union of India and Others, [AIR 2021 SC 5396] – †cMvmvm †KBm bv‡g weL¨vZ)
†hLv‡b Z‡_ï Drm †Mvcb ivLv‡K msweavb ¯^xK…Z msev`c‡Îi ¯^vaxbZvi Ab¨Zg ¸iæZ¡c‚Y© Ask ejv n‡q‡Q|
ivqwUi g~j fvl¨ wb‡gœ †`qv n‡jv –
An important and necessary corollary of such a right is to ensure the

protection of sources of information. Protection of journalistic sources is
one of the basic conditions for the freedom of the press. Without such
protection, sources may be deterred from assisting the press in informing
the public on matters of public interest.
`z`K AvBbRxex KZ©…K mvsevw`‡Ki kvw¯Í `vwei wel‡q Av`vjZ †cÖm KvDwÝj G±, 1974 Gi 12 bs avivq
DwjøwLZ weavbvewj Abzmi‡Yi wb‡`©k †`b| E³ aviv Abzhvqx hw` †cÖm KvDwÝj g‡b K‡i, †Kvb msev`cÎ
mvsevw`KZvi bxwZ-‰bwZKZvi mv‡_ mvsNwl©K †Kv‡bv msev` cÖKvk K‡i‡Q, Zvn‡j D³ wel‡q KvDwÝj cÖ‡qvRbxq
c`‡¶c wb‡Z cv‡i| GKB AvB‡bi 20 avivq msev`c‡Î cÖKvwkZ †Kv‡bv Z‡_ï weiæ‡× †Kv‡bv AvBwb cÖwµqvq
hvIqvi e¨vcv‡i mz¯úó wb‡lavÁv †`qv n‡q‡Q| Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb, †h‡nZz GwU †Kv‡bv Av`vjZ Aegvbbvi
gvgjv bq, ZvB G‡¶‡Î mvsevw`K‡K kvw¯Í †`qv Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqv‡i c‡o bv| iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ †`qv
n‡jv-
Apart from the above, as per submission of Mr. Khan, the reporter may
be punished since the matter is an offence. It may be noted that this
matter is not a contempt proceeding. The court simply issued an order
directing the Anti-Corruption Commission to explain as to whether or
not the reporting on corruption and irregularities that has been made by
the reporter, the Respondent No.02 is correct/true….Since it is not a
contempt matter, so the question of imposing punishment on the reporter
does not come within the ambit of contempt of this court.
6. BDwbwjfvi evsjv‡`k wjwg‡UW ebvg †Pqvg¨vb, RvZxq ivR¯^ ‡evW© [17 SCOB
(2023) HCD 137 (Custom Matter)]
ev`x BDwbwjfvi evsjv‡`k wjwg‡UW †Kv¤úvwb AvBb, 1994 Gi Aax‡b wbewÜZ GKwU †Kv¤úvwb| cÖwZôvbwU
hy³iv‡Rï gvwëb¨vkbvj †Kv¤úvwb BDwbwjfvi wcGjwmi mnvqK Ges evsjv‡`‡k cÖwZwbwaZ¡Kvix †Kv¤úvwb|
41
BDwjfvi evsjv‡`k wjwg‡UW †fmwjb&, bi, Wvf, †cc‡mv‡W›U, †K¬vR-Avc, G· BZ¨vw` c‡Yï GKgvÎ êa
cÖ¯ÍzZKviK| AÎ wcwUk‡b ev`x Zvi Drcvw`Z cY¨mg~‡ni mgvšÍivj cY¨ †hb Ab¨ †KD Avg`vwb Ki‡Z bv cv‡i,
†m wel‡q ïé KZ©…c¶‡K h_vh_ c`‡¶c MÖn‡Yi wb‡`©k †`qvi Av‡e`b Rvbvb (Prohibition on Parallel
Goods)| (mgvšÍivj cY¨ ej‡Z ezSvq, GKB e¨v‡Ûi †h cY¨¸‡jv ¯’vbxq cwi‡ekK †_‡K bv wK‡b we‡`‡ki
evRvi †_‡K Avg`vwb Kiv nq|)
wcwUk‡b GKB mv‡_ A‡bK¸‡jv e¨vsK‡K †imcb‡W›U Kiv nq, †hb Zv‡ì‡K DwjøwLZ cY¨¸‡jv Avg`vwbi Rb¨
Gjwm (Letter of Credit) bv Lzj‡Z wb‡`©k †`qv nq| Av‡e`‡bi c‡¶ hzw³ Dc¯’vcb K‡i ejv nq, ïé AvBb,
1969 Gi 15 bs aviv, Avg`vwb bxwZ Av‡`k, 2021-24 Gi 4 bs AW©vi Ges †UªWgvK© AvBb, 2009 G mgvšÍivj
cY¨ Avg`vwb‡Z wb‡lavÁv †`qv n‡q‡Q|
ïé AvBb, 1969 Gi 15 bs aviv ch©v‡jvPbvi ci Av`vjZ e‡j, G AvB‡b mgvšÍivj cY¨ Avg`vwbi Dci
cz‡ivczwi wb‡aavÁv †`qv nqwb, Avevi mgvšÍivj cY¨ Avg`vwbi Aeva ¯^vaxbZvI †`qv nqwb| eis GwU GKwU
fvimvg¨czb© AvBb| 15 avivq DwjøwLZ kZ©vewj †g‡b †h †KD mgvšÍivj cY¨ Avg`vwb Ki‡Z cvi‡e| ZvB
wcwUkbv‡ii AbzgwZ Qvov mgvšÍivj cY¨ Avg`vwb Kiv hvq bv, Ggb `vwe wfwËnxb| ZvB Av`vjZ iæjwU LvwiR
K‡i †`b| Av`vj‡Zi g‚jfvl¨ wbgœiƒc-
On a bare reading of Section 15 of the Customs Act, 1969 it reveals that

there is neither absolute bar in importing parallel goods nor said section
gives any unfettered right to the importers to import parallel goods.
Section 15 of the said Act is balanced legislation. Section 15(d)(e)(g)
and (h) of the said Act authorized the importers to import parallel goods
subject to compliance with the procedure/conditions as mentioned in the
said provision. Nothing has been stated in said section regarding prior
permission of the petitioner in importing parallel goods. Therefore, the
submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner that without prior
permission of the petitioner no one is legally entitled to import the
parallel goods of Unilever Bangladesh is misconceived and fallacious.
iæjwU LvwiR Kivi Av‡iKwU KviY wn‡m‡e Av`vjZ e‡jb, Avg`vwb bxwZ Av‡`k, 2021-24 Gi †Kv‡bv
j•N‡bi d‡j ms¶zä e¨w³ †UÖW GÛ U¨vwid Kwgk‡bi `…wó AvKl©Y Ki‡Z cv‡i| Avevi †UªWgvK© AvBb,
2009 Gi †Kv‡bv j•N‡bi Rb¨ ms¶zä e¨w³ †Ìqvwb Av`vj‡Z gvgjv `v‡qi Ki‡Z cv‡i| †h‡nZz Av‡jvP¨
AvBb¸‡jvi j•N‡bi Rb¨ weKí Ges mgcwigvY Kvh©Kix cÖwZKv‡ii eë¯’v Av‡Q, ZvB nvB‡KvU© wefvM
msweav‡bi 102 bs Abz‡”Q‡ì Aax‡b cÖwZKvi w`‡e bv| wb‡gœ iv‡qi mswkøó Ask †`qv n‡jv-
42
On examination of the aforesaid provisions of law, it reveals that the
legislature made specific provisions in Section 17 of the Customs Act,
1969, Order 4 of the Avg`vwb bxwZ Av`‡k, 2021-24, and Section 96 of the
Trademarks Act for alternative, effective and equally efficacious remedy
to the petitioner for violation of any condition laid down in Section 15 of
the Customs Act, 1969 regarding importation of parallel goods. Article
102 of the Constitution is not meant to circumvent or bypass statutory
procedures as stated above…… Judicial Prudence demands that this
Court should refrain from exercising its jurisdiction under the said
constitutional provision. This is a self-restrained restriction of the High
Court Division.
7. ‡gv: ‡gvwgbyj Bmjvg ebvg evsjv‡`k Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD
108 (Service Matter)]
ev`x Rbve gywgbyj Bmjvg MZ 03 b‡f¤î, 1986 mv‡j Rzwbqi wmwKDwiwU Awdmvi wn‡m‡e evsjv‡`k wegvb
GqvijvB‡m‡Ý †hvM`vb K‡ib| 2017 mv‡j wZwb cwiPvjK c‡` DbœxZ nb| 25 †deª~qvix, 2020 Zvwi‡L
evsjv‡`k wegvb Ki‡cv‡ikb (AemifvZv Ges Avby‡ZvwlK) wewagvjv, 1988 Gi wewa 5 (K) Abyhvqx wegvb
evsjv‡`k GqvijvB‡m‡Ýi eë¯’vcbv cwiPvjK Ges wmBI, Rbve gzKvweŸi †nv‡mb Zv‡K PvKzix †_‡K Aemi cÖ`vb
K‡i| wewa 5(K) Abzhvqx wegvb KZ©…c ¶ cÖ‡qvRb g‡b Ki‡j 25 eQi PvKix †k‡l †Kv‡bv Kg©KZ©v‡K Aemi
cÖ`vb Ki‡Z cv‡i| Rbve gzwgbzj D³ Aemi Av‡`k‡K A‰ea †NvlYv †P‡q nvB‡Kv‡U© GKwU wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi
K‡ib| DwjøwLZ Aemi Av‡`k‡K †Kb AvBb ewnf©‚Z Ges A‰ea †Nvlbv Kiv n‡e bv GB g‡g© nvB‡KvU© iæj wbwk
Rvwi K‡i| GB gvgjvq nvB‡KvU© D³ iæ‡ji wb®úwË K‡i|
ev`xc‡¶i AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, cwiPvjbv cl©‡ì Abz‡gv`b e¨ZxZ wmBI GKKfv‡e KvD‡K PvKzwi †_‡K
Aem‡i cvVv‡Z cv‡i bv| Aemi Av‡`kwU we‡Ølc‚Y© g‡bvfve (Malafide) †_‡K †bqv n‡q‡Q| Aciw`‡K weev`x
c‡¶i AvBbRxex `vwe K‡ib, wmBI GKKfv‡e KvD‡K PvKzwi †_‡K Aem‡i cvVv‡Z cv‡i cv‡ib| wZwb Av‡iv
`vwe K‡ib, mv¶¨ AvB‡bi aviv 114(O) Abyhvqx †Kv‡bv Awdwmqvj KvR‡K †KvU© mwVK Ges AvBbvbzhvqx Kiv
n‡q‡Q e‡j a‡i wb‡e| ev`xc¶ Av`vj‡Zi GB aviYv‡K (Presumption) LÐb (Rebut) Ki‡Z cv‡iwb|
weevw` c‡¶i AvBbRxex gvgjvi i¶YxqZv (Maintainability) wb‡q ‡Kv‡bv AvcwË DÌvcb K‡iwb| Av`vjZ
¯^c«‡Yvw`Z n‡q i¶YxqZv wb‡q Av‡jvPbv K‡i‡Qb| Av‡jvPbvi welqe¯—y wQj wegvb evsjv‡`k GqvijvB‡mÝ GKwU
‡kqvi Øviv mxwgZ`vq ‡Kv¤úvwb nIqvq Gi weiæ‡× RywWwkqvj wiwfD cª‡hvR¨ n‡e wK-bv| GB Bmyï wb®úwË Ki‡Z
43
wM‡q Av`vjZ Md. Arif Sultan vs. Chairman, Dhaka Electric Supply Authority and others,
60 DLR (2008) 431 ‡_‡K D™¢~Z dvBf-‡dvì ‡U÷ (Five-fold Test) cª‡qvM K‡ib| GB ‡U÷ Abymv‡i,
5 wU welq cvIqv ‡M‡j ‡Kv‡bv ‡Kv¤úvbx‡K miKvix G‡RÝx wn‡m‡e MY¨ Kiv hv‡e| Gi g‡a¨ 5g ‡U÷wU njy
‡Kv¤úvwbwU wK ‡g‡gv‡iÛvg Ges AvwU©‡Kj Ae G‡mvwm‡qkb (Memorandum and Article of
Association) Øviv cwiPvwjZ bvwK ‡Kv‡bv miKvwi AvBb Øviv| eZ©gvb gvgjvq ‡`Lv hvq, wcwUkbvi‡K
evsjv‡`k wegvb Ki‡cv‡ikb (AemifvZv Ges Avby‡ZvwlK) wewagvjv, 1988 Gi wewa 5 (K) Abyhvqx Aemi
‡`qv n‡q‡Q| myZivs ejv hvq, wegvb evsjv‡`k GqvijvB‡m‡Ýi Dci miKvwi mswewae× (Statutory) AvB‡bi
c«fve Av‡Q| ZvB GB gvgjvq RywWwkqvj wiwfD (Judicial Review) c«‡hvR¨ n‡e Ges wiU wcwUkbwU i¶Yxq
(Maintainable)|
Ab¨vb¨ Bmy¨ wb®úwË Ki‡Z wM‡q Av`vjZ e‡jb-
1. 2007 mv‡j wegvb evsjv‡`k K‡c©v‡ikb‡K wegvb evsjv‡`k GqvjvB‡mÝ wjwg‡UW

‡Kv¤úvbx‡Z iæcvšÍi Kiv nq| ‡g‡gv‡iÛvg Ges AvwU©‡Kj Ae G‡mvwm‡qkb n‡jv ‡Kv‡bv
‡Kv¤úvbxi msweavb| ‡Kv¤úvbx AvB‡bi mv‡_ mvsNwl©K bv n‡j G¸‡jv gvbv eva¨Zvg~jK
(Mandatory)| wegvb evsjv‡`k GqvijvB‡m‡Ýi ‡g‡gv‡iÛvg Ges AvwU©‡Kj Ae
G‡mvwm‡qk‡bi Aby‡”Q` 5(2) Abyhvqx, ‡Kv‡bv Kg©KZ©v‡K Zvi c` ‡_‡K Acmvi‡Yi Rb¨
cwiPvjbv cl©‡ì Aby‡gv`b c«‡qvRb nq| GB gvgjvq ev`x‡K Aem‡i cvVv‡bvi Rb¨ cwiPvjbv
cl©‡ì Aby‡gv`b ‡bqv nqwb| wmBI GKKfv‡e ev`x‡K PvKywi ‡_‡K Aem‡i cvVvb| myZivs
Av‡jvP¨ Aemi Av‡`kwU wewaewnf©~Z Ges we‡Ølc~Y© (Arbitrary and Malafide)|
2. mv¶¨ AvB‡bi aviv 114(O) GB gvgjvq cª‡hvR¨ n‡e bv| Kvib KZ©…c‡¶i Aemi
Av‡`kwU ‡h mr D‡Ï‡k¨ wQj bv, ev`xc¶ Zv cªgvY Ki‡Z m¶g n‡q‡Qb|
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ ev`x‡K e‡Kqv ‡eZb I Ab¨vb¨ cvwi‡ZvwlKmn Zvi c‡` cybe©nvj Kivi Rb¨ wegvb KZ©…c¶‡K
Av‡`k cª`vb K‡ib|
iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ cª`vb Kiv nj-
[Having gone through the memorandum and articles of association of

the Biman, the Ordinance and other materials on record and being
fortified with the principles laid down in Md.Arif Sultan, 60 DLR 431
and Mahbubur Rahman, 66 DLR 615 and the fact that the statutory
44
Rules, 1988 is still being followed by the Biman, we have no hesitation
to hold that the instant writ petition is maintainable.
In the case in hand, the Managing Director and CEO of the Biman
issued the impugned order retiring the petitioner from service without
any decision of the board of directors. No power was delegated to him to
take the decision. Therefore, he was not competent authority to retire the
petitioner. For this reason coupled with the attending facts and
circumstances of the case, the unauthorized exercise of power by the
Managing Director and CEO of the Biman is also without jurisdiction,
arbitrary and malafide.] (Emphasis Supplied)
8. PÆMªvg WªvB WK wjwg‡UW ebvg Gg.wU. dRj-B-ivweŸ Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB
(2023) HCD 82 (Custom Matter)]
cvbvgvi cZvKvevnx we‡`kx RvnvR M. T. FADL-E-RABBI cY¨ wb‡q evsjv‡`‡k Av‡m| wKš‘ cieZ©x‡Z
RvnvRwU‡K ¯‹ª¨vc RvnvR wn‡m‡e ‡Kv‡Ui« gva¨‡g wbjv‡g ‡Zvjv nq| ev`x Chattogram Dry Dock Ltd
m‡e©v”P wbjvg ì`vZv wn‡m‡e RvnvRwU‡K µq K‡i| Z‡e Zviv ‡Kv‡bv ewntïé (customs duties) w`‡Z
A¯^xKvi K‡i| ev`x‡K Zvi wbjv‡g µqK…Z RvnvRwU‡K hv‡Z ‡Kv‡bv ïé QvovB n¯ÍvšÍi Kiv nq, GB g‡g© wZwb
nvB‡Kv‡U© eZ©gvb Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡ib| ev`x `vwe K‡i, PÆMªvg Kv÷g‡mi mnKvix Kwgkbvi Rvwb‡qwQ‡jb ‡h,
Av‡jvP¨ RvnvRwUi ïé wba©vi‡bi ‡Kv‡bv my‡hvM ‡bB| cwÎKvi weÁvc‡bI ‡Kv‡bv ïé ‡`qvi K_v D‡jøL wQj bv|
wcwUkbv‡ii AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, ‡h‡nZy weÁvc‡b ‡Kv‡bv ïé ‡`qvi K_v D‡jøL wQj bv Ges PÆM«vg Kv÷g‡mi
mnKvix Kwgkbvi Rvwb‡qwQ‡jb, GB RvnvRwUi Dci ïé wba©vi‡bi ‡Kv‡bv my‡hvM ‡bB| myZivs PÆM«vg Kv÷g‡mi
mnKvix Kwgkbvi bZyb K‡i ïé `vwe Ki‡Z cvi‡e bv| GLv‡b DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL c«‡hvR¨
n‡e| wZwb Av‡iv `vwe K‡ib, ïé AvB‡bi aviv 18 GB gvgvjvq c«‡hvR¨ bq| KviY aviv 18 ïay Avg`vwb Ges
ißvwb c‡Yï ‡¶‡Î c«‡hvR¨| eZ©gvb gvgjvi RvnvRwU ev`x Avg`vwb K‡ibwb eis wZwb ‡KvU© ‡_‡K wbjv‡g µq
K‡i‡Qb| cwi‡k‡l wZwb `vwe K‡ib we‡`wk Rvnv‡Ri Dci Avg`vwb ïé `vwe Ki‡Z n‡j Bill of Entry Gi
c«‡qvRb nq| wKš‘ Av‡jvP¨ RvnvRwU Avg`vwb `«e¨ wn‡m‡e Bill of Entry Kiv nqwb| myZivs ev`x AÎ Rvnv‡Ri
Dci Avg`vwb ïé w`‡Z eva¨ bq|
Acic‡¶ ivó«c‡¶i wWGwR (DAG) evsjv‡`k U¨vwid wkwWDj, 2017 Dc¯’vcb K‡ib, ‡hLv‡b we‡`wk ¯‹ª¨vc
Rvnv‡Ri Dci Avg`vwb ïé Av‡iv‡ci K_v ejv n‡q‡Q| GQvovI wZwb `vwe K‡ib, eZ©gvb gvgjvi Av‡jvP¨
45
welqwU Bashiruddin Ahmed Vs Secretary, Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 179 gvgjvq gnvgvb¨
nvB‡KvU© wefvM A‡bK Av‡MB wb®úwË K‡i‡Qb|
`yÕc‡¶i ïbvwb ‡k‡l Av`vjZ gš—e¨ K‡ib –
1. GB gvgjvq Doctrine Of Estoppel c«‡hvR¨ n‡e bv| PÆM«vg Kv÷g‡mi mnKvix Kwgkbvi Zvi
c~‡ei« `yBwU wPwV‡Z Av‡jvP¨ RvnvRwUi ïé wba©vi‡bi ‡Kv‡bv my‡hvM ‡bB e‡j ‡`qv e³‡eï Rb¨ `ytL c«Kvk
K‡ib| GUv Zv‡ì Rywbqi Kg©KZ©vi fyj wQj| Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb, wbjv‡g µ‡qi c‡i ev`x Ab¨vb¨ ïé ‡hgb
weµq ïé I e›`‡ii e‡Kqv PvR© c«`vb K‡i‡Qb| cwÎKvq weÁvc‡b Gme ïé ‡`qvi K_v D‡jøL bv _vKv m‡Ë¡I
wZwb G¸‡jv c«`vb K‡i‡Qb| myZivs Avg`vwb ï‡éi K_v weÁvc‡b D‡jøL wQj bv weavq Avg`vwb ïé w`‡Z bv
PvIqvi hyw³wU M«nY‡hvM¨ bq| GQvovI weÁvc‡b further condition UvB‡Ujhy³ As‡k AwZwi³ kZ© Av‡iv‡ci
K_v D‡jøL wQj| mKj wbjvg‡µZvi Kv‡QB GB Z_¨wU ‡cŠQv‡bv n‡qwQj| ev`x ‡¯^”Qvq GB As‡ki mv‡_ GKgZ
‡cvlY K‡ib| myZivs ev`x‡K Av‡jvP¨ Rvnv‡Ri Dci Avg`vwb ïé w`‡Z n‡e|
2. ïé AvB‡bi aviv 18, 23, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 79 Ges Avg`vwb Ges idZvwb AvB‡bi
mswkøó Ask ch©v‡jvPbv ‡k‡l GUvB c«Zxqgvb nq ‡h, ‡Kv‡bv we‡`kx e¯—y ev cY¨ evsjv‡`‡k Avg`vwb Kiv n‡j
‡mUvi Bill of Entry ‡nvK ev bv ‡nvK, D³ c‡Yï Avg`vwb ïé w`‡Z n‡e|
3. ‡Kv‡bv gvgjvi ‡hme cvk¦©-Bmy¨ (Side-Issue) B‡Zvc~‡e© mycªxg ‡KvU© wb®úwË K‡i‡Qb, ‡mme Bmÿ‡Z
c~b©v½ ivq ‡P‡q Av`vj‡Zi ¸iæZ¡c~Y© mgq bó Kiv Kvg¨ bq| KviY eZ©gv‡b ‡`‡k Pjgvb gvgjvi msL¨vi Zyjbvq
wePviK‡ì msL¨v LyeB bMY¨|
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ ev`x‡K A_©vr wbjvg‡µZv‡K Rvnv‡Ri ïé (Customs Duties) Ges miKv‡ii Ab¨vb¨
cvIbv cwi‡kva K‡i Rvnv‡Ri gvwjKvbv ‡bqvi Av‡`k cª`vb K‡ib|
iv‡q mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ ‡Ìqv n‡jv-
[The inevitable conclusion on the first issue of the instant petition is that
there is no scope of application of the provisions of Section 115 of the
Evidence Act in the case of the auction-purchaser.
From a careful examination of the relevant provisions of the Customs

Act, namely, Sections 18, 23, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53 and 79 and relevant
provisions of the Import and Export Act, it leads me to hold that when
any foreign thing, object, goods, which would include a foreign vessel,
46
is brought into or comes in Bangladesh, be it without or with Bills of
Entry, it is dutiable.
[S]ince the number of Judges of this country are very negligible in

comparison to the case-load, it has become very difficult for the learned
Judges of this country to dispose of the substantive suit/matters and,
therefore, the learned Advocates should not expect detailed Judgment on
the side-issue of a suit/matter, which is already wellsettled by the Apex
Court of our jurisdiction.]
9. ‡gv: Rwniæj nK ebvg RR, A_© FY Av`vjZ, PÆMÖvg Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB
(2023) HCD 20 (Artha Rin Matter)]
weev`x †mvbvjx e¨vsK 2004 mv‡j PÆMÖvg A_© FY Av`vj‡Z F‡Yi UvKv cwi‡kv‡ai Rb¨ Rwniæj n‡Ki weiæ‡×
gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| Rbve nK wQ‡jb D³ F‡Yi M¨viv›Ui (guarantor)| 2009 mv‡j Av`vjZ Rbve nK‡K
my`mn F‡Yi UvKv cwi‡kva Kivi Av‡`k w`‡q wWwµ cÖ`vb K‡i| wKš‘ `vqxK (judgement debtor) UvKv
cwi‡kva bv Kivq 2010 mv‡j †mvbvjx e¨vsK A_© FY Av`vj‡Z A_© FY Rvwi gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| †mLv‡b
wWwµ`vi †mvbvjx e¨vsK A_© FY Av`vjZ AvBb, 2006 Gi 34 avivi Aax‡b GKwU Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡i hv‡Z
`vqxK‡ì‡K †Ìqvbx AvUKv‡`k †`qv nq Ges F‡Yi UvKv cwi‡kv‡a eva¨ Kiv nq| ïbvwb †k‡l Av`vjZ Rbve
nKmn Ab¨vb¨ `vwqK‡ì‡K Pvi gv‡mi †Ìqvbx AvUKv‡`k w`‡q AvUK c‡ivqvbv Rvix K‡i| ev`x AvZ¥mgc©Y bv
K‡i Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍ‡K P¨v‡jÄ K‡i eZ©gvb wiU wcwUkbwU dvBj K‡ib|
ev`xi AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, wWwµ`vi e¨vsK A_© FY Av`vj‡Zi aviv 34 Gi mKj kZ© (requirement) c‚iY
bv K‡iB Av‡e`bwU `v‡qi K‡i‡Qb| mzZivs GB Av‡e`bwU Am¤ú‚Y©| Gi Dci wfwË K‡i Av`vjZ wmwfj
wW‡Ubkb w`‡q AvBwb fzj (error in law) K‡i‡Q| wZwb Av‡iv `vex K‡ib, Av`vjZ g~j FYMÖnxZvi weiæ‡×
cÖ‡qvRbxq c`‡¶c bv wb‡qB Rbve n‡Ki weiæ‡× †Ìqvbx AvUKv‡`k Rvix K‡i‡Q|
Aciw`‡K weev`x c‡¶i AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, ev`x cjvZK †_‡K eZ©gvb wiU wcwUkbwU `v‡qi K‡i‡Qb| wZwb
Av‡iv `vex K‡ib, ev`x A_© FY Av`vjZ AvB‡bi 41 avivi Aax‡b Avwc‡ji gva¨‡g weKí cÖwZKvi
(alternative remedz) MÖn‡Yi mz‡hvM i‡q‡Q| mzZivs wcwUkbwU i¶Yxq n‡e bv|
`zBc‡¶i hyw³cÖ`vb †k‡l Av`vjZ wb‡¤§v³ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib-
47
1. wiU wcwUkbwU i¶Yxq (Maintainable)| KviY GKRb `vqxK (judgement debtor) Ges
†dŠR`vwi gvgjvi Awfhz³ cjvZK (Accused Fugitive) GK bq| †dŠR`vwi gvgjvq cjvZK †_‡K Awfhz³
e¨w³ wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi Ki‡Z cv‡i bv| wKš‘ †Ìqvbx gvgjvi `vqx‡Ki †¶‡Î G weavb cÖ‡hvR¨ bq| weKí
cÖwZKv‡ii cÖ‡kœ Av`vjZ e‡jb, wmwfj AvUKv‡`kwU wQj AšÍeZ©x Av‡`k (interlocutorz order)| ZvB Gi
weiæ‡× Avwcj K‡i weKí cÖwZKvi cvIqvi mz‡hvM wcwUkbv‡ii wQj bv|
2. wWwµ †nvìvi e¨vsK KZ©…K cÖ`Ë Av‡e`bwU 34 avivi mKj kZ© AbzmiY K‡i dvBj Kiv nqwb| KviY
Av‡e`bwU‡Z Civil Rules and Orders Gi wewa 19 Ges †dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai AW©vi 06 Gi wewa 15 Abzhvqx
†fwiwd‡Kkb ev njdbvgv (Affidavit) †Kv‡bvwUB mshz³ Kiv nqwb| myZivs D³ Av‡e`‡bi Dci wfwË K‡i
cÖ`Ë Av‡`kwU AvBbvbyhvqx mwVK bq|
mzZivs nvB‡KvU© wefvM Rule Nisi †K P‚ovšÍ (Absolute) K‡i ev`xi c‡¶ ivq cÖ`vb K‡i|
iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡jv-
The petitioner, a Judgment Debtor cannot be treated as a fugitive

accused and so, he did not require to surrender to the concerned Court
before challenging the impugned order awarding civil detention under
section 34 of the Act, 2003. Therefore, the writ petition is quite
maintainable.
The present application praying for civil detention of the judgment

debtor has not been filed in accordance with section 34(i) of the Act,
2003 and so the impugned order issued on the basis of this application,
cannot sustain in the eye of law.
10. cÖ‡dmi †gvnv¤§` BDbym ebvg ivóª [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 162]
KjKviLvbv I cÖwZôvb cwi`k©b Awa`ß‡ii gnvcwi`k©K kÖg Av`vj‡Z MÖvgxY †UwjKg Gi weiæ‡× GKwU Awf‡hvM
`v‡qi K‡ib| wZwb Awf‡hvM K‡ib, MÖvgxY †UwjKg cwi`k©b †k‡l wZwb evsjv‡`k kÖg AvBb, 2006 Ges kÖg
bxwZ, 2015 Gi wKQz weav‡bi j•Nb kbv³ K‡i‡Qb| Awf‡hvM¸wj nj-
1. wk¶vbwekKvj †k‡l kÖwgK Ges Kg©Pvwi‡ì PvKzwi ¯’vqx Kiv nqwb| GwU evsjv‡`k kÖg AvB‡bi 4(7)
avivi j•Nb|
48
2. kÖwgK Ges Kg©Pvwi‡ì gRywimn evwl©K QzwU ev QzwUi cwie‡Z© gRzwi (Pazment instead of leave)
†`qv nqwb| GwU evsjv‡`k kÖg AvB‡bi 117 avivi j•Nb|
3. kÖwgK Kj¨vY dvD‡Ûkb AvBb, 2006 Gi Aax‡b gzbvdvi 5 kZvsk kÖwgK Kj¨v‡Y cÖ`vb Kiv nqwb
Ges kÖwgK Kj¨vY Znwej I kÖwgK‡ì AskMÖnYg~jK Znwej MVb Kiv nqwb|
kÖg Av`vj‡Z Pjgvb gvgjv‡K evwZj †P‡q ev`x †dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewai 561(K) avivi Aax‡b GKwU Av‡e`b dvBj
K‡ib Ges nvB‡Kv‡UiÖ iæj AR©b K‡ib| GB gvgjvq nvB‡KvU© D³ iæ‡ji wb®úwË K‡ib|
wcwUkbvi AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib GB gvgjvi wbw`©ó msNUb-ZvwiL ( Date of occurrence) †bB| evsjv‡`k
kÖg AvB‡bi 314 avivq cÖ`Ë weavbvbzhvqx 6 gv‡mi g‡a¨ gvgjvwU `v‡qi bv Kivq GwU Zvgvw` AvBb Øviv evwiZ
(barred) n‡e| wZwb Av‡iv `vex K‡ib, hw` me¸‡jv Awf‡hvM‡K mZ¨ e‡j a‡iI †bqv nq, ZezI ev`xi mv‡_
evsjv‡`k kÖg AvB‡bi weavb f‡½i Awf‡hv‡Mi mv‡_ †Kv‡bv m¤ú„³Zv †bB| W. gznv¤§` BDbzm GKRb †bv‡ej
weRqx AvšÍR©vwZK A½‡b cÖkswmZ e¨w³| MÖvgxY †UwjK‡gi cÖkvmwbK I A_©‰bwZK eë¯’vcbvi Dci Zvi †Kv‡bv
KZ©…Z¡ †bB| ev`x‡K AÎ gvgjvq e¨w³MZ cÖwZwnsmv Ges kÎæZvi †R‡i Awfhz³ Kiv n‡q‡Q, †hwU kÖg AvB‡bi
312 avivi j•Nb| wZwb Av‡iv `vex K‡ib ev`x‡K kÖg AvB‡bi 3(4) avivi Aax‡b Avwcj Kivi mz‡hvM cÖ`vb Kiv
nqwb| ZvB GB gvgjvwU AcwicK¡ (Premature) Ges kÖg AvB‡bi 3(4) avivi j•Nb| wZwb cwi‡k‡l `vex
K‡ib, MÖvgxY †UwjKg †Kv¤úvwb AvBb, 1994 Gi 28 avivi Aax‡b evsjv‡`‡ki MÖvgvÂ‡j †UwjKg mzweav cÖmv‡ii
j‡¶¨ cÖwZwôZ GKwU AjvfRbK cÖwZôvb| †Kv¤úvwbwUi cwiPvjKe…›` †Kv‡bv gybvdv MÖnY K‡ib bv| mzZivs MÖvgxY
†UwjKg Zvi gybvdvi 5% kÖwgK Kj¨vY Znwe‡j cÖ`v‡b eva¨ bq|
weev`xc‡¶i AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, MÖvgxY †UwjKg‡K cÖ`Ë wPwVi Z_vKw_Z Awf‡hvM¸‡jv Zviv ¯^xKvi K‡i
wb‡q‡Q Ges †m¸‡jv Rvw÷dvB (Justifz) Kivi †Póv K‡i‡Q| GiB cwi‡cÖw¶‡Z evsjv‡`k kÖg AvB‡bi 319
avivi Aax‡b kÖg Av`vj‡Z gvgjvwU `v‡qi Kiv n‡q‡Q|
`zc‡¶i ïbvwb †k‡l Av`vjZ e‡jb-
1. AÎ gvgjvi Awf‡hvM¸wj kÖg AvB‡bi 3(4) avivi Aax‡b Kiv nqwb eis 319(5) avivi Aax‡b Kiv
n‡q‡Q| mzZivs gvgjvwU AcwicK¡ (Premature) Ges kÖg AvB‡bi 3(4) avivi j•Nb nIqvi hyw³wU MÖnY‡hvM¨
bq|
2. MÖvgxY †UwjK‡gi msN¯§vi‡K (memorandum) †Kv¤úvwbwU‡K AjvfRbK cÖwZôvb wn‡m‡e wPwýZ Kiv
nqwb| eis 71 Abz‡”Q` ejv n‡q‡Q, MÖvgxY †UwjKg gzbvdv AR©b Ki‡e wKš‘ gzbvdv msN¯§vi‡K ewY©Z
D‡Ïk¨mg‚‡ni cÖmv‡i eëüZ n‡e| jvfRbK †Kv¤úvwb nIqvq gybvdvi GKwU ¶z`Ö Ask kÖwgK‡ì Kj¨v‡Y cÖ`vb
49
Kiv eva¨Zvg‚jK| GQvovI †Kv¤úvwb AvB‡bi 28 avivq Ggb wKQz ejv nqwb hv †Kv‡bv †Kv¤úvwb‡K kÖwgK Kj¨vY
Znwe‡j gybvdvi GKwU Ask cÖ`vb Kiv †_‡K Ae¨vnwZ †`q|
3. msN¯§vi‡Ki 33 I 34 Abz‡”Q` Ges msNwewa (Articles of Association) †_‡K GUv cwi®‹vi †h,
MÖvgxY †UwjK‡gi eë¯’vcbv Ges cwiPvjbvi †¶‡Î cwiPvjbv cl©‡ì c~Y© KZ©…Z¡ _vK‡e| mzZivs MÖvgxY †UwjK‡gi
A_©‰bwZK eë¯’vcbvq wcwUkbv‡ii †Kv‡bv f‚wgKv †bB GUv ejv hv‡e bv| KviY wcwUkbviI cwiPvjbv cl©‡ì
m`m¨|
4. MÖvgxY †UwjKg KZ©…K kÖg AvB‡bi Z_vKw_Z j•N‡bi Awf‡hvM cÖ_g kbv³ nq 9/2/2020 Zvwi‡L|
AZtci Awf‡hvMKvix MÖvgxY †UwjKg‡K GKwU wPwV‡Z D³ Awf‡hvMmg‚‡ni weiæ‡× cÖwZKvig‚jK eë¯’v †bqvi
Av‡`k †`b| D³ wPwVi †Kv‡bv m‡šÍvlRbK cÖZ¨zËi bv cvIqvq 16/08/2021 Zvwi‡L 2q cwi`k©b AbzwôZ nq|
†mLv‡bI c~‡e©i Awbqg¸‡jv kbv³ nIqvq 28/08/2021 Zvwi‡L kÖg Av`vj‡Z gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq| myZivs
AÎ gvgjvi wbw`©ó msNUb-ZvwiL (Date of Occurrence) i‡q‡Q Ges evsjv‡`k kÖg AvB‡bi 314 aivq cÖ`Ë
weavbvbyhvqx 6 gv‡mi g‡a¨ gvgjvwU `v‡qi Kivq GwU Zvgvw` AvBb Øviv evwiZ (barred) n‡e bv| Dciš‘ †Kv‡bv
gvgjvq Zvgvwì cÖkœwU AvBb Ges NUbvewj Abzmv‡i wba©vwiZ n‡e|
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ AÎ wcwUkbwUi †Kv‡bv mvie¯Íz (Substance) †bB e‡j ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib Ges iæj LvwiR K‡i
†`b|
iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wb‡¤§ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡jv-
Since the GTC is a profit earning company it is not understandable as to

why the company will not contribute a very insignificant part of its net
profit for the welfare of its labors. There is nothing in Section 28 of the
Companies Act which exempts any Company registered under above
provision from making above contribution to the Labor Welfare Fund.
It is crystal clear form above Articles that the Board of Directors

exercises full managerial and financial control over the GTC and is
responsible for the management and administration of the affairs of
GTC. As such it cannot be said at this stage of the proceedings that the
petitioner has no role in the financial management and administration of
the GTC.
50
As such, it prima facie appears that this case has a date of occurrence
and the same has been filed within six months from the date of
occurrence as provided in Section 314 of Bangladesh Labor Ain, 2006.
Moreover, it is well settled that a question of limitation is a mixed
question of law and facts which can be determined on consideration of
evidence to be adduced at trial.
On consideration of above facts and circumstances of the case and

materials on record and relevant laws we are unable to find any
substance in this petition under section 561A of the Code of Criminal
Procedure and the rule issued in this connection is liable to be
discharged.]
11. mvwgqv ingvb ebvg evsjv‡`k Ges Ab¨vb¨ [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 82
(Service Matter)]
XvKv wek¦we`¨vj‡qi MY‡hvMv‡hvM I mvsevw`KZv wefv‡Mi mn‡hvMx Aa¨vcK mvwgqv ingv‡bi weiæ‡×
†c-wRqvwiR‡gi Awf‡hvM D‡V| Xvwe wmwÛ‡KU Zv‡K kvw¯Í wn‡m‡e `zeQ‡ii Rb¨ mnKvix Aa¨vcK c‡` c`vebwZ
(Demotion) †`q| GB wm×všÍ‡K P¨v‡jÄ K‡i wZwb nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M eZ©gvb wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡ib|
wcwUkbvi AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, ev`x‡K Zvi weiæ‡× MwVZ Z`šÍ KwgwU Ges UÖvBezbv‡ji wi‡cv‡UiÖ cÖwZwjwc
(copz) †Ìqv nqwb| dj¯îƒc ev`x Zvi weiæ‡× DÌvwcZ Awf‡hv‡Mi Kvh©Kix wW‡dÝ (Defense) cÖ`vb Ki‡Z
cv‡iwb, †hwU Natural Justice Gi j•Nb| wZwb Av‡iv `vwe K‡ib, XvKv wek¦we`¨vj‡qi Enquirz
Committee and Tribunal (Teachers and Officers) Regulation , 1980 Gi 7(K) I 11
†i¸‡jkb Abzhvqx KvD‡K †kvKR †bvwUk †Ìqvi †¶‡Î wmwÛ‡KU‡K PvR© MVb K‡i cÖ¯ÍvweZ kvw¯Íi welqwU †kvKR
†bvwU‡k wbw`©ó K‡i D‡jøL Ki‡Z n‡e| wcwUkbvi‡K †`qv KviY `k©v‡bvi (Show Cause) †bvwU‡k †mwU Kiv
nqwb| ZvB D³ †kvKR †bvwUk‡K mswewae× (Statutorz) †kvKR †bvwUk ejv hv‡e bv| wZwb Av‡iv `vwe K‡ib,
gnvgvb¨ AvPv‡h©i mgx‡c ev`xi `v‡qiK…Z AvwcjwU 6 gv‡mI wb®úwË bv nIqvq GwU‡K LvwiR Kiv n‡q‡Q e‡j MY¨
Kiv hvq| wZwb cwi‡k‡l `vwe K‡ib, ev`x‡K A‰eafv‡e mn‡hvMx Aa¨vcK c‡` c`vebwZ †Ìqvq msweav‡bi
27,31 Ges 40 Abz‡”Q‡` cÖ`Ë †gŠwjK AwaKvi jw•NZ n‡q‡Q|
Aciw`‡K weev`x c‡¶i AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib, AÎ wiU wcwUkbwU i¶Yxq bq| †Kbbv GLv‡b weZwK©Z I
cÖkœmv‡c¶ NUbvw` (Disputed question of facts) we`¨gvb, †hwU wiU GLwZqv‡i (Jurisdiction) wePvh©
51
welq bq| wZwb Av‡iv `vwe K‡ib, XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq AW©vi, 1973 Gi 52 Abz‡”Q‡ì Aax‡b ev`xi weKí
cÖwZKvi (Alternative Remedz) MÖn‡Yi my‡hvM i‡q‡Q| wZwb 52 Abz‡”Q‡ì Aax‡b gnvgvb¨ AvPvh© eivei
Avcxj Ki‡Z cvi‡Zb| wZwb Av‡iv `vwe K‡ib, ev`xi weiæ‡× MwVZ wZb m`m¨wewkó UÖvBezbv‡j Zvi GKRb
cÖwZwbwa wQj| mzZivs ev`x‡K Natural justice Gi bxwZ Abzhvqx Zvi ¯^c‡¶ hyw³ ¯’vc‡Yi mz‡hvM †`qv n‡q‡Q|
wZwb cwi‡k‡l `vwe K‡ib, Xvwe wmwÛ‡KU UªvBezbv‡ji mycvwik MÖnY Ki‡e wKbv G e¨vcv‡i wmwÛ‡K‡Ui wbR¯^
¶gZv (Discretion) i‡q‡Q| wmwÛ‡K‡Ui D³ ¶gZv mswewae× ¶gZv (Statutorz Power) nIqvq Gi
weiæ‡× RywWwkqvj wiwfD cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e bv|
`yc‡¶i ïbvwb †k‡l Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib-
1. Z`šÍ KwgwUi wbKU Awf‡hvM †cÖi‡Yi c~‡e© Xvwe wmwÛ‡KU XvKv wek¦we`¨vj‡qi Enquirz Committee
and Tribunal ( Teachers and Officers ) Regulation, 1980 Gi 7(K) †i¸‡jk‡bi weavb Abzhvqx
ev`xi weiæ‡× †Kv‡bv AvbzôvwbK PvR© MVb Ges Zvi weiæ‡× cÖ¯ÍvweZ kvw¯Íi welqwU wbw`©ófv‡e D‡jøL K‡iwb|
mzZivs ev`x‡K c`vebwZ cÖ`vb msµvšÍ mg¯Í Kvh©µg ïiæ‡ZB evwZj (void ab-initio) e‡j MY¨ n‡e| Ges
AvB‡bi †Pv‡L MÖnb‡hvM¨ bq| ZvB c`vebwZi wm×všÍwU A‰ea| Dciš‘, First Statute of Dhaka
University Gi 45(5) aviv Abzhvqx wmwÛ‡KU †mme wm×všÍ UªvBeybv‡ji mzcvwik Abzhvqx MÖnY K‡i‡Q, ïaz
†mmKj wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× Avcxj MÖnY‡hvM¨ bq| †h‡nZz ev`xi wec‡¶ †bIqv wm×všÍwU UÖvBezbv‡ji mzcvwik QvovB
M„nxZ n‡q‡Q, D³ wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq AW©v‡ii 52 Abz‡”Q‡ì Aax‡b Avwcj K‡i ev`xi weKí
cÖwZKvi cvIqvi my‡hvM †bB|
2. UªvBeybvj ev`xi weiæ‡× mivmwi †c-wRqvwiR‡gi cÖgvY cvqwb| ZvB UªvBeybvj ev`xi c‡`vbœwZ I evwl©K
†eZb e„w× GK eQ‡ii Rb¨ ¯’wMZ K‡i jNz kvw¯Í cÖ`v‡bi mycvwik K‡i| wKš‘ Xvwe wmwÛ‡KU UÖvBezbv‡ji mzcvwi‡ki
wecix‡Z ev`x‡K `zeQ‡ii Rb¨ mn‡hvMx Aa¨vcK c‡` c`vebwZ †`q| mzZivs c`vebwZi wm×všÍwU wfwËnxb Ges
Lvg‡Lqvwjc~Y© (Whimsical)| KviY UªvBeybvj cÖ`Ë AbzmÜv‡bi Dci wfwË K‡iB wmwÛ‡KU KvD‡K kvw¯Í w`‡Z
cv‡i|
3. ev`x‡K Z`šÍ KwgwU wKsev UªvBezbv‡ji †Kv‡bv wi‡cvU© cÖ`vb Kiv nqwb| dj¯îƒc wmwÛ‡K‡Ui wm×v‡šÍi
weiæ‡× wZwb Avcxj `v‡qi Kivi h‡_ó my‡hvM cvbwb| GwU ¯úóZB Natural justice Gi Pig j•Nb| mzZivs
wmwÛ‡K‡Ui wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× msweav‡bi 102 Aby‡”Q‡ì Aax‡b wiU wcwUkb `v‡qi Ki‡Z †Kv‡bv evav †bB|
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ, ev`x‡K cÖ`Ë wmwÛ‡K‡Ui c`vebwZi wm×všÍwU‡K A‰ea †NvlYv K‡i Ges 28/01/2021 †_‡K
¯’wMZ e‡Kqv mKj †mev Ges A_©‰bwZK mzweav (usual service and financial benefits) cÖ`v‡bi Rb¨
wek¦we`¨vjq KZ©…c¶‡K Av‡`k †`b| cvkvcvwk Av`vjZ GB Avkv e¨³ K‡i †h, wek¦we`¨vjq KZ©…c¶
†c-wRqvwiRg cÖwZ‡iv‡ai Rb¨ AwP‡iB Kvh©Ki D‡`¨vM MÖnY Ki‡e|
52
iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡jv-
[In the instant case, prior to referring the allegations to the Enquiry
Committee set up by the Syndicate for enquiry into the allegations
brought against the petitioner, the Syndicate omitted to frame a formal
charge against the petitioner with a statement of the allegations on which
the charge is based and also specifying therein the penalty proposed to
be imposed in terms of Regulation No. 7 of the Enquiry Committee and
Tribunal (Teachers and Officers) Regulations, 1980 and hence, the
entire exercise by the respondent No. 2 University of Dhaka and its
officials leading up to the purported demotion of the petitioner in service
by the Syndicate is void ab-initio and, as such, non-est in the eye of law.
Since the impugned order of demotion of the petitioner in service was

passed by the Syndicate without any recommendation of the Tribunal,
there is no appealable order from the Syndicate and, hence, no question
of preferring any appeal under Article 52 of the Dhaka University Order,
1973 arises.
Admittedly, the petitioner was not provided with any of the reports of
either the Enquiry Committee or the Tribunal and, as such, the petitioner
was not given an effective opportunity to prefer an appeal against the
Syndicate’s decision to demote her which is also a grave violation of the
principles of natural justice and, thus, in our view, there is no bar in
filing a writ petition under Article 102 of the Constitution against such
decision of the Syndicate.
In view of the above discussion and consideration of the facts and

circumstances of the case as well as materials on record, our
dispassionate view is that the impugned Memo dated 15.02.2020
(Annexure-A to the Writ Petition) is liable to be declared to have been
issued without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and the same is
53
liable to be set aside as being void-ab-initio and coram non judice.]
(Emphasis added)
12. ‡gvnv‡¤§` dviæK-Dj-AvRg ebvg wbe©vPb Kwgkb [17 SCOB (2023) HCD
01 (Custom Matter)]
FY †Ljvwci M¨viv›Ui (guarantor) nIqvi Kvi‡Y wiUvwb©s Awdmvi BDwbqb cwil` wbe©vP‡bi †Pqvig¨vb c`cÖv_©x
ev`x dviæKzj AvR‡gi g‡bvbqb cÎ (nomination paper) evwZj K‡i †`b| wiUvwb©s Awdmv‡ii D³ wm×v‡šÍi
weiæ‡× nvB‡KvU© wefvM msweav‡bi Avby‡”Q` 102 Gi Aax‡b iæj wbwk Rvwi K‡i|
wcwUkbvi AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib †h, FY †Ljvwci Rvwgb`vi nIqvi Kvi‡Y †Pqvig¨vb c`cÖv_©x ev`xi g‡bvbqb cÎ
evwZj n‡Z cv‡i bv| KviY ¯’vbxq miKvi (BDwbqb cwil`) AvBb 2009 (ms‡¶‡c 2009 mv‡ji AvBb) Gi
aviv 26 (2)(R) Abyhvqx GUv ¯úó †h, FY †Ljvwc‡ì wbe©vP‡b cÖv_©x bv nIqvi weavb FY †Ljvwci M¨viv›Ui
(guarantor) Gi Rb¨ cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e bv| eis Zv †Kej g‚j Fb †Ljvwc‡ì Dci cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e | `vwei c‡¶
AvBbRxex GKwU cÖvmw½K gvgjv †ck K‡ib: Mrs. Farin Hossain –Vs- Bangladesh Election
Commission and others
weev`x c‡¶i AvBbRxex wb‡e`b K‡ib †h,ev`xi †Pqvig¨vb c‡` cÖv_©x nIqvi †hvM¨Zv evwZj Kivi g~j KviY GB
†h, CIB (Credit Information Bureau) Gi FY †Ljvwc‡ì M¨viv›Ui‡ì (guarantor) ZvwjKvh়
wcwUkbv‡ii bvg AšÍf©z³ i‡q‡Q | GQvov ev`x M/S Fsruque Ul Azam Gi mv‡_ e¨vsK †_‡K FY wbh‡়
wbw`©ó mg‡q cwi‡kva K‡ibwb|G‡Z mswkøó e¨vsK A_© FY gvgjv bs 12 (2005) `v‡qi K‡iwQj|
weev`xc‡¶i AvBbRxex D‡jøL K‡ib †h,2009 mv‡ji AvB‡bi aviv 26(3) Abzmv‡i ev`x c¶ g‡bvbqb c‡Îi
mv‡_ cÖ‡qvRbxq Z_¨ cÖKvk K‡i njdbvgv hz³ K‡iwb| dj¯îƒc ev`x AvBb Abyhvqx wbe©vP‡b cÖv_©x nIqvi
†hvM¨Zv nvivb|
Rev‡e wcwUkbvi AvBbRxex cybivq `vex K‡ib †h, mswkøó Av`vjZ B‡Zvg‡a¨ A_© F‡Yi gvgjvwU wb®úwË K‡i
w`‡q‡Qb| mswkøó e¨vsKI cybivq FY cwi‡kv‡ai ‡gqv` wba©viY K‡i w`‡q‡Q|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h, FY †Ljvwci M¨viv›Ui (guarantor) nIqvi Kvi‡Y GKRb cÖv_©x Dch©z³
wbe©vP‡b cÖwZØb&Øx n‡Z A‡hvM¨ n‡eb bv| Gi c‡¶ wePviK Mrs. Farin Hossain –Vs- Bangladesh
Election Commission and others (writ petition No.2042 of 2021) gvgjvi Av`vj‡Zi ivq‡K
cÖvmw½K e‡j gšÍe¨ K‡ib |
54
Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨g‡Z,
It is now a settled principle of law that a guarantor to a defaulted loan

amount is not disqualified to contest respective election, as has been
observed by one of Benches of this Division in Mrs. Farin Hossain –Vs-
Bangladesh Election Commission and others in connection with writ
petition No.2042 of 2021
Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb †h DwjøwLZ A_© FY msµvšÍ gvgjvwU `zc‡¶i cvi¯úwiK m¤§wZi wfwË‡Z wb®úwË nIqvq Zv
G‡¶‡Î Avi †Kvb evav m„wó Ki‡e bv|
Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨g‡Z,
However, from order No.57 dated 09.05.2011 (Annexure-H to the

supplementary affidavit of the writ petition) it appears that said
execution case has been disposed of on account of amicable settlement
between the respective contending parties. Considering the above, the
assertion so made by the added respondent No.7 to that effect falls
through.
Av`vjZ Av‡iv wm×všÍ †`b †h, 2010 mv‡ji iæj 12 I 2009 mv‡ji AvB‡bi aviv 26(3) Abzmv‡i, BDwbh়b
cwil` wbe©vP‡b cÖv_©x‡K H mg¯Í ¸iæZ¡c~Y© Z_¨ cÖKv‡ki cÖh‡়vRb †bB †h¸‡jv cÖv_©x‡ì‡K g‚j¨vq‡b †fvUvi‡ì
cÖ‡qvRb c‡o| Z‡e †cŠimfv wbe©vPb, Dc‡Rjv cwil` wbe©vPb,wmwU K‡c©v‡ikb wbe©vPb Ges msm` wbe©vP‡b
g‡bvbqb cÎ Rgv †Ìqvi mgq njdbvgvq cÖv_©x‡ì‡K Dch©y³ Z_¨ ¸‡jv w`‡Z n‡e| Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍwU
wbgœiƒc,
In view of the said contention of the respondent No.1 and also,

considering the position of law as provided in Section 26(3) of the Ain,
2009 read with Rule 12 of the Rules,2010 (as amended in 2016), it is
apparent that in Union Parishad election the respective candidate is not
required to disclose those 7(seven) vital information, which are essential
for the respective voters to know in order to assess, evaluate and
ultimately to select their candidates who is going to represent them as
55
the head of the respective rural administrative and local government unit
for a prescribed period. Although, in Paurashava election, Upazilla
Parishad election, City Corporation election and Parliamentary election
those informations are required to be provided by the respective
candidate while submitting nomination paper by giving ‘njdbvgv’ in a
prescribed from along with declaration (‡NvlYv). Said view of ours finds
support in the case of Md. Abu Safa Vs. Abdul Momen Chowdhury,
Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2007, as well as the case of People’s Union for
Civil Liberties Vs. India, (2009) 3SCC200.
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ wcwUkbvi‡K wbe©vP‡b c«w ZØwb&ØZv Kivi my‡hvM cª`vb K‡i ‡NvlYv ‡`b ‡h, ev`x ‡h‡nZy wbe©vP‡b
c`cªv_©x n‡Z A‡hvM¨ bb, ZvB wiUvwb©s Awdmvi KZ©…K g‡bvbqb evwZj Kiv AvBb ewnf©~Z I A‰ea|
Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨g‡Z-
Considering the above, it can clearly be discerned that since the

petitioner is not a disqualified candidate; hence, cancelling his
nomination paper by the Returning Officer and being affirmed by the
Appellate authority is liable to be declared to have been passed without
lawful authority and hence, of no legal effect. In the result, the Rule is
made absolute.
13. PÆMÖvg e›ì KZ©…c¶ ebvg †gv: †g‡nw` nvmvb [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 34]
PÆMÖvg e›ì KZ©…c¶ †M÷ nvDR wbg©vY Ki‡Z XvKvq Rwg µq K‡i| †M÷ nvDR wbg©vYKv‡j weev`x †g‡n`x nvmvb
bvwjwk Rwgi Dci µq m‚‡Î gvwjKvbv `vwe K‡ib Ges Rwgi `Lj czbiæ×v‡ii Rb¨ gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| wKš‘
gvgjv `v‡q‡ii Av‡M weev`x‡K (GLv‡b ev`x) †bvwUk cÖ`vb bv Kivq Acic¶ Av`vj‡Z gvgjvi êaZv wb‡q cÖkœ
Zz‡j| D³ cÖ‡kœ †Rjv RR Av`vjZ e‡j, AÎ gvgjvq Abziƒc †Kv‡bv †bvwUk cÖ`v‡bi weavb Kvh©Ki n‡e bv|
ev`xc¶ Z_v e›ì KZ©…c‡¶i AvBbRxex wb‡e`b K‡i, weev`xi gvgjvwU AvB‡bi `…wó‡Z MÖnY‡hvM¨ n‡ebv| KviY
gvgjvwU Chittagong Port Authoritz Ordinance, 1976 (ms‡¶‡c Òthe Ordinance, 1976Ó) Gi
aviv 49 Abzmv‡i c‚Ö&eeZ©x †Kvb †bvwUk QvovB `v‡qi Kiv n‡qwQj| c‚Ö&eeZ©x †bvwUk bv cvVv‡bv PÆMÖvg e›ì
KZ©…c‡¶i weiæ‡× gvgjv `v‡q‡i mz¯úó AvBwb evav Av‡ivc K‡i| G‡¶‡Î †Rjv R‡Ri wm×všÍ AvB‡bi `…wó‡Z fzj
(error of law) wQj|
56
weev`x c‡¶i AvBbRxex `vwe K‡ib †h, PÆMÖvg e›ì KZ©…c‡¶i weiæ‡× gvgjv `v‡q‡ii c~‡e© the Ordinance,
1976 Gi 49 avivi Aax‡b †bvwUk cÖ`vb eva¨Zvg~jK bq|
GgZve¯’vq Av`vj‡Zi mvg‡b `z‡Uv ¸iæZ¡c~Y© cÖkœ DÌvwcZ nq - 1. c~e©eZ©x †Kvb †bvwUk QvovB e›ì KZ©…c‡¶i
weiæ‡× gvgjv Kiv hv‡e wKbv| 2. †bvwUk bv Kiv m‡Ë¡I gvgjvwU i¶Yxq n‡e wKbv|
nvB‡KvU© wefvM wm×všÍ †`q †h, the Ordinance, 1976 Gi aviv 49 Gi Aax‡b PÆMÖvg e›ì KZ©…c‡¶i weiæ‡×
†bvwUk cÖ`vb Kiv †nvK ev bv †nvK, ev`xi gvgjvi Kwcmn Av`vj‡Zi mgb Rvwi Kivi welqwU †bvwU‡ki D‡Ïk¨
c‚i‡Y h‡_ó n‡e| AvBbwU‡Z Rwgi we‡iva mgvav‡b weKí †Kvb cÖwZKvi Abzcw¯’Z _vKvq †bvwUk cÖ`vb bv Kiv
m‡Ë¡I gvgjvwU i¶Yxq (maintainable) n‡e| cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ ev`xi Av‡e`b bvgÄzi K‡i †`b Ges `zB
gv‡mi g‡a¨ wePvwiK Av`vjZ‡K AÎ gvgjvwU wb®úwË Ki‡Z Av‡`k †`b| Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Abyhvqx-
In such view of the matter, if a person already institutes a suit under

whatever notion and the summon with a copy of the plaint is served
upon the port authority, the purpose of notice under Section 49 of the
Ordinance would be sufficiently served inasmuch as no alternative
remedy is provided in the Ordinance for dissolving any land dispute
between the Port Authority and a private individual.
We, therefore, do not find any merit in the rule. Accordingly, the rule is
discharged however without any order as to cost. The trial court is
directed to conclude the hearing of the suit within 2 (two) months from
receipt of this judgment.
14. weM em K‡c©v‡ikb wjwg‡UW ebvg Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi U«v÷ [17 SCOB [2023]
HCD 57 (Arbitration act, 2001)]
Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó Gi mv‡_ weM em K‡c©v‡ikb wjwg‡U‡Wi GKwU Pzw³ m¤úvw`Z nq| Pzw³i kZ© Abyhvqx ÒweM
em K‡c©v‡ikb wjwg‡UWÓ mvwjkx †gvKÏgv bs- 01/2019 `v‡qi K‡i I mvwj‡ki Kvh©µg ïiæ K‡i| Avwg©
I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó mgq †P‡q ìLv¯Í Ki‡j mvwjkx UªvBezbvj Zv gÄzi K‡ib Ges ïbvbxi ZvwiL wba©viY K‡b©| wKš‘
wba©vwiZ Zvwi‡L mvwjkx †gvKÏgvq Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó Gi c‡¶ †KD Dcw¯’Z bv _vKvq UªvBe¨zbvj bZzb ZvwiL
wba©viY K‡i †`q| cieZ©x‡Z Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó evi evi GKBfv‡e wba©vwiZ Zvwi‡Li mvwj‡k Abycw¯’Z _vKvq
mvwjkx UªvBe¨zbvj †gvKÏgvwUi GKZidv ïbvbx †kl K‡ib Ges ‡iv‡q`v` cÖ`vb K‡ib| ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji
wbwg‡Ë Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó mvwjkx AvBb, 2001 Gi 42 I 43 avivi AvIZvq ìLv¯Í `vwLj K‡i| wKš‘
57
ìLv¯ÍwU `v‡qi 188 w`b wej¤^ nIqvq wej¤^ gIKz‡di Rb¨ Zvgvw` AvB‡bi AvIZvq Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó Aci
GKwU ìLv¯Í `vwLj K‡i| weÁ †Rjv RR D³ ìLv¯Í gÄzi K‡i mvwjkx AvBb, 2001 Gi 42 I 43 avivi
ìLv¯ÍwU ïbvbxi Rb¨ MÖnY K‡ib Ges ‡iv‡q`v` Gi mKj Kvh©µg cieZ©x wb‡`©k bv †Ìqv ch©šÍ ¯’wMZ K‡ib|
D³ Av‡`‡k ms¶zä n‡q weM em K‡c©v‡ikb wjwg‡UW AÎ wmwfj wiwfkb `v‡qi K‡i iæjwU AR©b K‡i|
GgZve¯’vq, Av`vj‡Zi mvg‡b cÖkœ DÌvwcZ nq †h, AvBb Abzhvqx 60 (lvU) w`b mgqmxgv AwZµvšÍ nIqvi ciI
†Kvb c¶ wej¤^ gIKz‡di Av‡e`bmn mvwjkx ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji Av‡e`b Ki‡j Av`vjZ KZ©…K Zv gÄz‡ii
AvBbMZ †Kv‡bv my‡hvM i‡q‡Q wK bv|
gvgjvq ev`xc¶ Abzcw¯’Z wQj| weev`x c‡¶i AvBbRxex `vex K‡ib †h, mvwjk AvBb, 2001 Gi 42 aviv
†gvZv‡eK 60 (lvU) w`‡bi g‡a¨ mvwjk ‡iv‡q`v` P¨v‡jÄ Kivi mz‡hvM cÖ`vb Kiv nh‡়‡Q| wKš‘ G‡¶‡Î Zvgvw`
AvBb 1908 Gi aviv 5 †gvZv‡eK wej¤^ gvR©bvi mz‡hvM cÖ`vb Kiv nh়wb| wKš‘ weÁ †Rjv RR, XvKv
AviwewUÖkb wewea Av‡e`bwU `vwL‡j Zvgvw` mgq gIKzd K‡i AvBbMZ fzj K‡i‡Qb|
AvB‡bi ¸iæZc~Y© c‡kœ Av`vjZ GB g‡g© wm×všÍ †`b †h-we‡kl AvB‡b Zvgvw` AvB‡b 1908 Gi cÖ_g Zdwm‡j
ewY©Z wba©vwiZ †gqv` A‡c¶v wfbœZi Zvgvwì †gqv‡ì weavb mzwbw`©ó _vK‡j Zvgvw` AvB‡bi aviv 29(2)
†gvZv‡eK Zvgvw` AvB‡bi aviv 5 cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e bv|
Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb †h, aviv 42 †_‡K GwU Kvu‡Pi gZ ¯úó †h, mvwjkx ‡iv‡q`v` cÖvwßi 60 (lvU) w`‡bi g‡a¨
ms¶zä c¶‡K evsjv‡`‡k AbzwôZ AvšÍR©vwZK evwYwR¨K mvwjkx ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji †¶‡Î nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M Ges
mvwjkx AvBb, 2001 Gi Aaxb cÖ`Ë mvwjkx ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji †¶‡Î †Rjv RR Av`vj‡Z Av‡e`b `vwLj Ki‡Z
n‡e|
weÁ Av`vjZ Av‡iv gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h,‡h‡nZz Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó mvwjkx AvBb, 2001 Gi 42 avivq ewY©Z
mgqmxgv Z_v 60 (lvU) w`‡bi g‡a¨ mvwjkx ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji ìLv¯Í `vwLj K‡ib bvB, †m‡nZz weÁ †Rjv
RR, XvKv KZ©…K D³ ìLv¯Í mivmwi cÖZ¨vLvb Kiv DwPZ wQj| wKš‘ weÁ †Rjv RR, XvKv AvB‡bi fzj e¨vL¨v
K‡i Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi Uªvó KZ©…K `vwLjK…Z mvwjkx ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji ìLv¯Í `vwL‡j 188 w`b wej‡¤î ìLv¯Í
GLwZqvi ewnf©‚Zfv‡e MÖnY K‡i Ges D³ wej¤^ gIKzd K‡i ‡iv‡q`v` evwZ‡ji ìLv¯ÍwU ïbvbxi Rb¨ MÖnY
K‡i‡Qb weavq weÁ †Rjv RR, XvKvi Dcwiwj-wLZ Av‡`kwU n¯Í‡¶‡c †hvM¨|
cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ Avwg© I‡qj‡dqvi UÖvó Gi 188 w`b wej‡¤î ìLv¯Í MÖnY Ges wej¤^ gvR©bv K‡i cÖ`Ë Av‡`k
†eAvBbx I GLwZqviwenxb †NvlYvµ‡g evwZj K‡i †`b|
58
15. cÖwei Kzgvi ‡` @ mvBdzj Ges Ab¨ ebvg wkcÖv ivbx †` Ges Ab¨b¨ [17 SCOB
[2023] HCD 154 (Hindu Inheritance)]
AÎ gvgjvi ev`xi ¯^vgx iex›`Ö Kzgvi †` 1978 mv‡j ¯¿x, `zB †Q‡j I Pvi †gqv‡` †i‡L gviv hvb| gvgjvq bvwjkv
f‚wgi cwigvY 4.81 kZvsk| iex‡›`Öi ¯¿x AviwZ evjv m¤úwË‡Z wb‡Ri AwaKvi †P‡q eÈ‡bi gvgjv K‡ib| gvgjv
`v‡qi Kivi Av‡M Zvui GK †Q‡j cÖ`xc gviv hvb Ges Ab¨ †Q‡j cÖexi Bmjvg MÖnY K‡ib| gvgjvi wePvivaxb
Ae¯’vq ev`xi g„Z¨z n‡j iex‡›`Öi AweevwnZ Kb¨v wkcÖv ivYx gv‡qi ¯’jvwfwl³ ev`x nb| hM¥ †Rjv RR ev`x c‡¶
ivq †`b| weev`x cÖexi Kzgvi Ii‡d mvBdzj Bmjvg nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M Avwcj K‡ib| Avwc‡ji iv‡q Av`vjZ wn›`z
AvBb Abzmv‡i ¯^vgxi m¤úwË‡Z ¯¿xi DËivwaKvi Ges wcZv I gvZv Df‡qi m¤úwË‡Z Kb¨vi DËivwaKvi wb‡q
Av‡jvPbv K‡ib|
nvB‡KvU© wefvM wn›`y bvix‡ì m¤úwËi AwaKvi AvBb, 1937, RvZ cÖwZeÜKZv AcmviY AvBb, 1850 Ges
Bangladesh Laws (Revision and Declaration) Act, 1973 ch©v‡jvPbv K‡ib| Av`vjZ G g‡g© ivq
†`b †h, wn›`z AvB‡bi `vqfvM avivi Aax‡b GKRb wn›`y hLb †Kv‡bv m¤úwË †i‡L gviv hvb, ZLb Zvi weaev ¯¿x
cz‡Îi mgvb m¤úwËi Ask cv‡eb| RxweZ _vKvKvjxb m¤úwËi m¤ú‚Y© gvwjK (complete owner) _vK‡eb Z‡e
m¤úwË‡Z ¯¿xi AwaKvi _vK‡e mxwgZ (Limited Interest)| Zvi g…Z¨zi ci ¯^vgxi cieZ©x DËivwaKvix (Next
Heir) m¤úwË cv‡eb| Av`vjZ AviI e‡jb, Bmjvg a‡g© ag©všÍwiZ nIqvi ci czÎ cÖexi Zvi wcZvi m¤úwË‡Z
Zvi AwaKvi nvwih‡় †d‡j‡Q| d‡j Avi †Kv‡bv fvB Ges AweevwnZ †evb bv _vKvq iex›`Ö Kzgvi †`-Gi
AweevwnZ Kb¨v wkcÖv ivbx †` AviwZ evjvi g„Zyï ci Zvi ¯^vgxi cieZ©x DËivwaKvix৷ (Next Heir) wn‡m‡e
m¤úwË cv‡eb| Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Abyhvqxt
Having regard to facts and circumstances, we are of the view that trial
court on proper consideration and appreciation of the evidence and
materials on record rightly decreed the suit in part on finding that the
original plaintiff, Arati Rani Bala Dey wife of Rabindra Kumar Dey
became owner and co-sharer of the property and had right to file the suit
for partition during her life time. After her death, her share was passed
to Rabindra Kumar Dey from whom she inherited and Shipra Rani Dey
as only unmarried daughter of Rabindra Kumar Dey will get the same
from Rabindra Kumar Dey as next heir since the only son Probir Kumar
Dey, who was alive but converted to Muslim earlier before opening the
inheritance of Rabindra Kumar Dey on the property which was passed
from Arati Bala Dey at her death on 24.04.2008.
59
16. nvweev †eMg ebvg ivóª [28 BLC (2023) 324]
Av‡jvP¨ wcwUk‡b GKB NUbv †_‡K m„ó GKwU wm.Avi gvgjv I GKwU wR.Avi gvgjv‡K GKB mv‡_ ïbvbxi Rb¨
nvB‡KvU© wefvM iæj Rvwi K‡ib| cªwmwKDk‡bi fvl¨ Abyhvqx, Aveyj Lv‡qi bv‡gi GK e¨w³ RMbœv_cyi _vbvq
GKUv Gd.AvB.Avi `v‡qi K‡ib| †mLv‡b K‡qKR‡bi Dci ¸iæZi AvNv‡Zi Awf‡hv‡M 38 Rb e¨wক্তকে Avmvgx
Kiv nq Ges Av‡iv 20/30 Rb‡K AÁvZbvgv ivLv nq| AvNvZcªvß‡ì GRb¨ cieZ©x‡Z nvmcvZv‡j gviv hvq|
GB NUbvi cªvq 8 gvm ci AÎ wiU wcwUk‡bi wcwUkbvi g¨vwR‡÷ª‡Ui wbKU GKwU wm.Avi †KBm `v‡qi K‡ib| G
†KB‡m 17 Rb e¨w³‡K bvg D‡jøL K‡i Ges Av‡iv 8/10 Rb AÁvZbvgv e¨w³ Avmvgx Kiv nq| wcwUkbvi `vwe
K‡ib, Awfhy³ e¨w³iv Zv‡K Zv‡ì GKR‡bi evwo‡Z AvU‡K †i‡L Zv‡ì weiæ‡× gvgjv bv Kivi Rb¨ Pvc
†`q| nvgjvq AvnZ‡ì nvmcvZv‡j fwZ©i e¨vcv‡iI Zviv Mwogwm K‡i| g~j NUbv GK nIqv‡Z wePvwiK
g¨vwR‡÷ªU Dfq gvgjv GKBmv‡_ ïbvbxi Av‡`k †`b| wKš‘ Gd.AvB.Avi `v‡qiKvix c¶ wiwfkb Ki‡j †Rjv
`vqiv RR Av`vjZ †m Av‡`k‡K evwZj K‡i †`b| d‡j gvgjv nvB‡Kv‡U© wefv‡M Av‡m|
‡h‡nZy Dfq gvgjv GKB NUbv †_‡K D™¢yZ Ges gvgjv`y'wUi wfw±g, mv¶xiv Ges Awfhy³ e¨w³ivI cªvq GK,
ZvB Av`vjZ gvgjv`y'wU‡K cvkvcvwk ïbvbxi Av‡`k †`b| †Kbbv, GKB NUbvq `ywU gvgjv Pj‡j wfbœ wfbœ
Av`vjZ †_‡K mvsNwl©K ivq Avm‡Z cv‡i| ¸iæZ¡c~Y© miKvix mgq bó n‡e| ZvQvov †dŠR`vwi Kvh©wewa, 1898
Gi 205N aviv cªeZ©‡bi wcQ‡bI AvBbcª‡YZv‡ì Abyiƒc D‡Ïk¨ wQj| D³ avivq GKB NUbv †_‡K D™¢yZ
wm.Avi †KBm Ges wR.Avi †KB‡mi Avmvgx GKB n‡j gvgjv`y'wU GKBmv‡_ ïbvbxi wb‡`©kbv †`qv nq|
Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ wbgœiƒc
If on the self-same occurrence two cases have been arisen and the two cases
fixed by two different Judges there is every chance of conflicting decisions.
So, it should not be allowed in any manner; moreover, it will take valuable
public time. Considering all these the legislature has enacted section 205D
which has been duly considered by the Magistrate. But the Additional
Sessions Judge without assigning any cogent ground has set- aside the order of
the Magistrate. Both the cases be heard and disposed of by the same judge
keeping side by side.
17. ivóª ebvg `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb [75 DLR (2023) 163]
AÎ gvgjvq Rvnvjg bv‡gi GK e¨w³ fyj cwiP‡q `xN© wZb eQi KvivMv‡i KvUvb| †mvbvjx e¨vs‡Ki cªvq mv‡o 18
†KvwU UvKv †PK RvwjqvwZi Rb¨ `y`K Avey mv‡jK bv‡gi GKRb e¨w³i weiæ‡× 33wU gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| Z`šÍ
Kg©KZ©v‡ì Ae‡njvq Ges e¨vsK Kg©KZ©v‡ì fyj kbv³Ki‡Yi Rb¨ Avey mv‡j‡Ki cwie‡Z© Rvnvjg `xN© 3 eQi
KvivMv‡i KvUvb| GKwU †emiKvix †Uwj‡fk‡bi AbymÜvbx cªwZ‡e`b Ges GKwU RvZxq ˆ`wb‡Ki wi‡cv‡U©i
60
gva¨‡g welqwU Av`vj‡Zi bR‡i Av‡m| Av`vj‡Zi my †gv‡Uv iæj Rvwii gva¨‡g AÎ wiU wcwUkbwUi m~Pbv nq|
wg_¨v kbv³Ki‡Yi Rb¨ Av`vjZ eª¨vK e¨vsK‡K 15 j¶ UvKv ¶wZc~iY †`qvi wb‡`©k †`b|
Av`vjZ Z`‡šÍ fyj Kiv m‡Ë¡I `y`‡Ki Kg©KZ©v‡ì wb®‹…wZ †`b, †h‡nZy Zviv e¨vsK Kg©KZ©v‡ì Øviv fyj c‡_
cwiPvwjZ n‡qwQj| `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb AvBb, 2004 Gi 31 avivq ejv n‡q‡Q, `y`K Kg©KZ© v‡ì Øviv mij
wek¦v‡m K„Z †Kv‡bv Kv‡R †KD ¶wZMª¯Í n‡j `y`‡Ki weiæ‡× †Ìqvwb ev †dŠR`vwi gvgjv Kiv hv‡ebv| GB aviv
AbymiY K‡i Av`vjZ `y`K‡K †Kv‡bv ¶wZc~iY cª`v‡bi wb‡`©kbv †`qwb| Z‡e fwel¨‡Z Z`‡šÍ G ai‡bi fyj bv
Kivi Rb¨ K‡Vvi wb‡`©kbv †`b| weÁ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ wbgœiƒc -
But we are of the view, that the Anti-Corruption Commission is a national

institution and independent authority formed for prevention of corruption and
to act in accordance with law. They have rules and regulation to proceed with
the investigation and they should be very careful about such false implication
of any person in any case in future. So that the public perception at large will
be in favour of the Anti-Corruption Commission.
Rvnvjg‡K Avey mv‡jK wn‡m‡e kbv³Ki‡Yi wcQ‡b g~j †nvZv wn‡m‡e Av`vjZ eª¨vK e¨vs‡Ki Kg©KZ©v wg. dqmvj
Kv‡qm Ges wgm mvwebv kviwgb‡K `vqx K‡ib| Zviv Uv½vBj wM‡q Rvnvjg‡K Avey mv‡jK wn‡m‡e kbv³ K‡ib|
`y`‡Ki Kvh©vj‡qI Zviv GKB KvR K‡ib| †Kbbv Avey mv‡jK‡K Lyu‡R bv †c‡j Zv‡ì weiæ‡× PvR©wkU `vwLj
Kivi m¤¢vebv wQj| Zv‡ì Kg©Kv‡Ði Rb¨ Av`vjZ Zv‡ì wb‡qvMKvix cªwZôvb eª¨vK e¨vsK‡K 15 j¶ UvKv
¶wZc~iY cª`v‡bi wb‡`©k cª`vb K‡ib| G‡¶‡Î Av`vjZ civ_© `v‡qi bxwZ (Principles of Vicarious Liability)
AbymiY K‡ib|
we are of the view that the vital role was played by the officials of Brae Bank
respondent No. 10 to falsely implicate Jahalam in this case in place of Abu
Salek and respondent No. 10 Bank should pay compensation of the aforesaid
act of their office...... There have been several instances in Bangladesh where
employer was vicariously found liable for the act of the employee in the
course of business of the employer. Application of the principles of vicarious
liability is seen in the cases, Catherine Masud vs Md Kashed Mia Bangladesh
Beverage Industries vs Rawshan Akter, 69 DLR (AD)196.
61
18. evsjv‡`k †d«BU diIqvW©vi G‡mvwm‡qkb ebvg †iwR÷ªvW© R‡q›U ‡÷vK †Kv¤úvwb
Ges dvg© Ges Ab¨vb¨ [Writ Petition No. 150 of 2021]
AÎ gvgjvq †Kv¤úvwb AvBb,1994 Gi Aax‡b wbewÜZ evsjv‡`k †d«BU diIqvW©vi G‡mvwm‡qkb wbw`©ó mg‡qi
c‡i msMwVZ `ywU evwl©K mvaviY mfvi êaZv †NvlYvi Rb¨ Ges AbvKvw•¶Z †ìxi d‡j †`q Rwigvbv gIKy‡di
Rb¨ Av‡e`b K‡ib| †KvwfW-19 Gi cª‡Kv‡ci Rb¨ †Kv¤úvwbwU 2020 mv‡ji evwl©K mvaviY mfv Ki‡Z cv‡iwb|
cieZ©x‡Z 2020 I 2021 mv‡ji evwl©K mvaviY mfv GKBmv‡_ Av‡qvRb Kivi Rb¨ weGGd kvnxb nj eivÏ
†bqv nq| wKš‘ e½eÜyi Rb¥kZevwl©Kx Av‡qvR‡bi Rb¨ miKvix wb‡`©kbvq nj KZ©…c¶ G eivÏ evwZj K‡i|
Ae‡k‡l 2021 mv‡ji 4 Gwcªj Ryg wgwUs G †Kv¤úvwbwU GKBmv‡_ G `ywU mvaviY mfv Av‡qvRb K‡i| AÎ
gvgjvq †Kv¤úvwb AvBb, 1994 Gi 85(3) avivq Av`vjZ‡K cª`Ë †¯^”Qvaxb ¶gZvbyhvqx (Discretionary
Power) G `ywU mvaviY mfvi êaZv †P‡q Av‡e`b Kiv nq|
wec¶ AvBbRxex `vwe K‡ib, †Kv¤úvwb AvBb,1994 Gi 81 aviv Abyhvqx, cª‡Z¨K †Kv¤úvwb cª‡Z¨K Bs‡iwR
K¨v‡jÛv‡i GKwU evwl©K mvavi mfv Abyôvb Ki‡e| hw` wba©vwiZ mg‡qi g‡a¨ evwl©K mvaviY mfv Av‡qvRb Ki‡Z
e¨_© nIqvi m¤¢vebv _v‡K, Zvn‡j †iwR÷v‡ii wbKU wba©vwiZ mgq e„w×i Av‡e`b Ki‡Z n‡e| hw` Av‡qvRb
Kivi mgq AwZevwnZ n‡q hvq, Zvn‡j Av`vj‡Zi AbygwZ wb‡q evwl©K mvaviY mfv Av‡qvRb Ki‡Z n‡e| †h‡nZy
wcwUkbvi evwl©K mvaviY mfv Av‡qvRb Kivi ci Av`vj‡Zi AbygwZ wb‡”Qb, ZvB DcwiD³ mfv`ywU êa bq|
Av`vjZ AvBbRxexi hyw³Z‡K©i mv‡_ GKgZ †cvlY K‡ib| Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ wbgœiƒc-
…It appears that for all types of companies,……an AGM must be held
for each of the Gregorian calendar year, and though the gap between
holding of one AGM to holding of another AGM may be maximum 15
(fifteen) months, but the latest date for holding the AGM for each
calendar year is 31st December for the concerned calendar year. If any
company fails to hold its AGM on or before 31st December for the
concerned calendar year, it must approach the Company Court for
extension of time for holding the said AGM………This being the
landscape, while it was incumbent upon the company to send any
member of the company to this Court for holding the AGM for the
calendar year 2020 seeking extension of as much time as needed to
mitigate the situation, under a misconception of law, it approached the
executives of the land and, ultimately, fell in error by holding the AGM
for the calendar year 2020 and, thereafter, committed another mistake in
62
the same breath by holding the AGM for the calendar year 2021, without
first validly holding the AGM for the calendar year 2020.
wec‡¶i AvBbRxexi Av‡iKwU `vwe wQj, †Kv¤úvwbwU evwl©K mvaviY mfv AbywôZ nIqvi gvÎ 14 w`b c~‡e© cª_‡g
B-‡gB‡j †bvwUk †cªiY K‡i, Zvici †iwR÷vW© †cv‡÷ †cªiY K‡i| wKš‘ AvBb Abyhvqx †bvwUk Aek¨B †iwR÷ªvW©
†cv‡÷ cvVv‡Z n‡e, †mUvI Kgc‡¶ 21 w`b c~‡e©| Av`vjZ e‡jb, B-‡gB‡j cvVv‡bvi Rb¨ †bvwUkwU A‰ea n‡e
bv| †Kbbv †iwR÷vW© †cv‡÷ cvVv‡bvi wbqgwU wbQK wb‡`©kbvg~jK, eva¨Zvg~ jK bq| Z‡e aviv 85 Abyhvqx
evwl©K mvaviY mfvi Kgc‡¶ 21 w`b c~‡e© †bvwUk bv cvVv‡bvi Kvi‡Y msMwVZ mfv`yÕwU A‰ea e‡j MY¨ n‡e|
In order to hold an AGM validly, therefore, allowing/affording twenty

one days time to the members of the company from the date of issuing of
notice to the date of holding of the AGM is a mandatory provision
……However, the law regarding mode of services of notices by the
company to its-members i.e. whether notice should be served personally
or by registered post or by some other means, is a mere directory
provision.
‡Kv¤úvwbi c¶ †_‡K hyw³ †`qv nq, evwYR¨ gš¿Yvjq †_‡K RvwiK„Z GKwU mvK©yjv‡i †KvwfW-19 Gi Rb¨ mKj
†UªW G‡mvwm‡qkb, Mªæc, †P¤^vi BZ¨vwì evwl©K mvaviY mfv Ges wbe©vPb 2020 mv‡ji 31 wW‡m¤î ch©šÍ gyjZex
Kiv nq| ZvB h_vmg‡q (31 wW‡m¤^‡ii c~‡e©) mfv Av‡qvRb Kiv m¤¢e nqwb| Av`vjZ e‡jb, GKwU miKvwi
mvKy©jvi AvB‡bi wecix‡Z wM‡q wb‡`©kbv w`‡j †mwU MªnY‡hvM¨ bq| AvBb Abyhvqx evwl©K mvaviY mfv Aek¨B 31
wW‡m¤^‡ii c~‡e© Ki‡Z n‡e| ZvB hyw³wU MªnY‡hvM¨ bq|
Even if the said Government Circulars had contained a mandate for

holding AGMs of the Bangladeshi companies beyond the time-frame
specified in the Companies Act, the said AGMs would have been invalid
in the eye of law, for, no Government Circular is legally capable of
overriding a provision of any Act of Parliament.
‡imcb‡W›U Gi AvBbRxex Av‡iKwU hyw³ Dc¯’vcb K‡ib †h, †Kv¤úvwb AvB‡bi aviv 81(2) Gi Aax‡b ïay
†Kv¤úvwbi †kqvi‡nvìvi‡ì Gwcø‡Kkb `vwL‡ji AbygwZ †`qv n‡q‡Q| GKBfv‡e, 85 avivi Aax‡b †Kv¤úvwb
cwiPvjK ev †kqvi‡nvìvi‡ì Gwcø‡Kkb `vwL‡ji AbygwZ †`qv n‡q‡Q| wKš‘ AÎ wcwUk‡b †Kv¤úvwb ¯^qs
Gwcø‡Kkb `vwLj K‡i‡Q, hv AvBbm¤§Z bq| Av`vjZ G hyw³i c‡¶ I wec‡¶i hyw³¸‡jv Av‡jvPbv K‡ib| Z‡e
†Kv‡bv AvB‡bi mywbw`©ó e¨vL¨v †`qv †_‡K weiZ _v‡Kb| †Kbbv B‡Zvg‡a¨ wcwUk‡bi g~jcªkœwU wb®úwË n‡q
wM‡q‡Q|
63
‡imcb‡W›U Gi AvBbRxex Av‡iKwU hyw³ Dc¯’vcb K‡ib †h, †Kv¤úvwbwU avivi 81(2)(evwl©K mvaviY mfv)
Aax‡b Gwcø‡Kkb `vwLj K‡i‡Q| wKš‘ G avivq Av`vjZ‡K wbR D‡`¨v‡M evwl©K mvaviY mfv Avnevb Kivi ¶gZv
†`qv nqwb| ZvB GB Gwcø‡KkbwU MªnY‡hvM¨ n‡e bv| Gi DË‡i Av`vjZ e‡jb, 85(3) avivi Aax‡b
Av`vjZ‡K wbR D‡`¨v‡M †Kv¤úvwbi †h‡Kv‡bv mfv Avnevb, Abyôvb I cwiPvjbvi Rb¨ Av‡`k †`qvi ¶gZv †`qv
n‡q‡Q| cª`Ë ¶gZve‡j Av`vjZ 81(2) Gi Aax‡b GKwU Gwcø‡Kkb‡K 85(3) Gi Aax‡b GKwU Gwcø‡Kk‡b
iƒcvšÍi Ki‡Z cv‡i| ûeû iv‡qi Ask wb‡gœ †`qv n‡jv-
Since the Company Court has been invested with the suo motu power to call,
hold and conduct any types of the meeting of a company (Board Meeting,
General Meeting, Extra Ordinary General Meeting and Statutory Meeting) in a
scenario where calling or holding or conducting, either doing any of these
three businesses or any two of these businesses or all of the three businesses,
becomes impracticable as per the provisions of the Companies Act or as the
provisions of the Articles of Association of the company, there is no
impediment to treat an application under Section 81(2) of the Companies Act
as an application under Section 85(3) of the Companies Act by exercising
Court's suo motu power.
19. A¨vW‡fv‡KU Gg. G. AvwRR Lvb ebvg evsjv‡`k wbe©vPb Kwgkb [Writ
Petition No. 3185 of 2023]
AÎ gvgjvwU ivóÖcwZ wbe©vPb AvBb, 1991 Gi Aax‡b GKgvÎ ivóÖcwZ cÖv_©x - Rbve †gvt kvnveywÏ‡bi
g‡bvbqbcÎ hvPvB-evQvB‡K P¨v‡jÄ K‡i GKRb weÁ AvBbRxexi `v‡qi Kiv GKwU wiU wcwUkbwb RwoZ| weÁ
AvBbRxex `vwe K‡ib †h, cÖavb wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi ivóªcwZ cÖv_©xi †hvM¨Zv m¤úwK©ZAvB‡bi fzj e¨vL¨v cÖ`v‡bi
gva¨‡g †h hvPvB-evQvB m¤úbœ K‡i‡Qb Zv wQj ÎzwUc~Y© Ges A‰ea| nvB‡KvU© wefvM D³ Av‡e`bwU msw¶ßfv‡e
LvwiR K‡i †`q| d‡j wZwb wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi K‡ib| weÁ AvBbRxex wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, Rbve kvnvezwÏb
†h‡nZz c~‡e© `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgk‡bi Kwgkbviwnmv‡e `vwqZ¡ cvjb K‡i‡Qb, ZvB, wZwb `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb AvBb,
2004 Gi 09 avivi wewaAbzhvqx ivóªcwZ c‡` cÖwZØš^xZv Kivi Rb¨ †hvM¨Zv nvwi‡q †d‡j‡Qb| Av‡e`bKvix hzw³
w`‡qwQ‡jb †h, †Kvb AvBb ev mvsweavwbK weavb Abyhvqx GB A‡hvM¨Zv AcmviY e¨wZZ Rbve kvnveywÏ‡bi
ivóÖcwZ wbe©vPb A‰ea wQj| `zb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb AvB‡bi 9 avivq ejv n‡q‡Q †h, ÒKg©vemv‡bi ci †Kvb
Kwgkbvi cÖRvZ‡š¿i Kv‡h© †Kvb jvfRbK c‡` wb‡qvM jv‡fi †hvM¨ n‡eb bv |ZvB wcwUkbvi Gi cÖavb `vwe wQj
†h, Rbve kvnvezwÏb †h‡nZz cÖRvZ‡š¿i Kv‡h© jvfRbK c‡`(an office of profit in the service of the
Republic) wb‡qvM jvf Ki‡eb, ZvB wZwbivóªcwZ c‡ì wbe©vP‡b AskMÖnb Ki‡Z A‡hvM¨ e‡j we‡ewPZ
64
wQ‡jb| ZvB Av`vj‡Zi wbKU GB cÖkœ `vuovq †h, evsjv‡`‡ki GKRb ivóªcwZi c` cÖRvZ‡š¿i Kv‡h©
†KvbjvfRbK c` wK bv? (Whether the office of the President of the People's Republic
ofBangladesh is an office of profit in the Service of the Republic.) Zvici Av`vjZ cÖRvZ‡š¿i
Kv‡h© "office of profit " ev jvfRbK c` Gi msÁv wb‡q AbzmÜvbKi‡Z wM‡q wewfbœ fviZxq I evsjv‡`kx
gvgjvi D‡jøL K‡i e‡jb, †h mKj c‡` miKvi Avw_©K (pecuniarz) mzweav ev wewbgq cÖ`v‡bi gva¨‡g wb‡qvM
cÖ`vb, wb‡qvM AcmviY, K‡g©i kZ©vejx I hveZxq dvskb mg~n wbqš¿Y K‡i _v‡K †m mKj c` †K cÖRvZ‡š¿i
Kv‡h© jvfRbK c` wn‡m‡ewe‡ePbv Kiv nq| Zvici Av`vjZ msweav‡bi 152 Abz‡”Q` G cÖ`vbK…Z cÖRvZ‡š¿i
Kvh© ev serviceof the Republic Gi msÁvi Av‡jv‡K gšÍe¨ cÖ`vb K‡ib †h, GKgvÎ c`cÖv_©x kvnvezwÏb
cÖRvZ‡š¿iKv‡h© †Kvb jvfRbK c` aviY K‡ib bv| †h‡nZz evsjv‡`‡ki miKvi ivóÖcwZ‡K wb‡qvM cÖ`vb K‡ibv ev
Zvi B”Qvg‡Zv AcmviY Ki‡Z cv‡i bv eis ivóªcwZ‡K msm‡ì `zB Z…Zxqvsk m`‡mï m¤§wZ‡Z RwUj Awfmskb
cÖwµqvi gva¨‡g AcmvwiZ n‡Z nq, mzZivs ivóªcwZi c`‡K cÖRvZ‡š¿iKv‡h© jvfRbK c` e‡j MY¨ Kiv mgxPxb
bq| wb‡gœ G e¨cv‡i Av`vj‡Zi wm×v‡šÍi mswkøó Ask Zz‡j aiv njt
"It is the authoritz of the Government to appoint a person to any office

of profit or, to revocate his appointment at their discretion and to pay out
of the Government revenues. In the case of President of the People's
Republic of Bangladesh, Government of Bangladesh can't appoint
president. Removal of President is also very stringent since he can be
removed by impeachment by two-thirds majority of the total members
of the parliament (Article 52 and 53of the Constitution). Government
can't remove President at its will since Government may be formed by
simple majority of the members of Parliament [article 56 of the
constitution]. So from this point of view of control over the President by
the Government, The office of the President can in no way betermed as
an office of profit in the service of the Republic in respect of the
Government.Ó
‡h‡nZz D³ wcwUkb Gi gva¨‡g kvnveywÏb Gi mv‡_ mivmwi ÿzYœ ev cÖfvweZ nZ, ZvB Zv‡K wcwUkbGi Aci c¶
wn‡m‡e Awfhy³ bv Kivq cÖvK…wZK b¨vqwePvi ev Natural justice Gi bxwZ fs‡Mi K_v D‡jøL K‡ib Av`vjZ|
iv‡óªi ¸iæZ¡c~Y© c‡ì wbe©vPb †K P¨v‡jÄ K‡i `v‡qi Kiv wiU wcwUk‡bi cavalier approach mgv‡jvPbv K‡i
weÁ Av`vjZ D³ wcwUkb‡K LvwiR K‡i †`b, mv‡_ GK j¶¨ UvKv Cost| D³ jxf Uz Avwcj Gi wcwUkbKvix
weÁ AvBbRxex‡K AW©vi cvIqvi `yB mßv‡ni g‡a¨ UvKv Rgv w`‡Z Av`vjZ wb‡`©k K‡ib|
65
jÕ j¨ve
‡gvnv¤§` wkwki gwbi ‡gvnv¤§` mvÏvg †nv‡mb ‡gvnv¤§` wgRvbyj nK
GjGjwe(Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe(Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg
XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
A¨vW‡fv‡KU A¨vW‡fv‡KU A¨vW‡fv‡KU
evsjv‡`k mycÖxg †KvU©| evsjv‡`k mycÖxg †KvU©| evsjv‡`k mycÖxg †KvU©|
‡nW Ae †P¤^vim, jÕ j¨ve| ‡WcywU ‡nW Ae †P¤^vim, jÕ j¨ve| wmwbqi A¨v‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve|
Ave`yjøvn mvw`K hv‡q` web AvgRv` ‡gvnv¤§` kvn‡bIqvR mvwKe

GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg
XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
A¨vW‡fv‡KU A¨v‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve| A¨v‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve|
evsjv‡`k mycÖxg †KvU©|
wmwbqi A¨v‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve|
QvweŸi ingvb kixd gvnw` Avãyjøvn Acy

GjGjwe (Abvm©), GjGjGg (weBDwewU) GjGjwe (Abvm©) GjGjwe (Abvm©)
wimvP© A¨v‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
B›Uvb©, jÕ j¨ve| B›Uvb©, jÕ j¨ve|
bvCg Avkivd
GjGjwe (Abvm©)
XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
B›Uvb©, jÕ j¨ve|
66

Avbwb MVJZVGVWG 2023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Avbwb MVJZVGVWG 2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AvBwb mvjZvgvwg 2023

mK‡ji mn‡hvwMZv GKvšÍ Kvg¨|

(‡gvnv¤§` wkwki gwbi)

2. cvwievwiK Av`vjZ AvBb 2023

AvBbwU Kvh©Ki nq| AvB‡b †gvU 31wU aviv i‡q‡Q|

Kvh©wewaÕ‡Z †h A‡_© e¨eüZ n‡q‡Q †m A‡_© e¨eüZ n‡e| 3

cvwievwiK Av`vjZ cÖwZôv I GLwZqvi

‡gvKÏgv `v‡q‡ii c×wZ

ch©vß msL¨K AviwRi bKj I Ab¨vb¨ `wjj mshy³ Ki‡Z n‡e| 9

‡gvKÏgv Lvwi‡Ri KviYmg~n

M. wewa Abyhvqx ‡KvU© wd cwi‡kva bv Ki‡jI AviwR LvwiR n‡e| 12

mgb I †bvwUk RvwiKiY

AviwR I wjwLZ Reve ms‡kvab

cÿM‡Yi Abycw¯’wZi djvdj

Section 5 Gi weavb Dcaviv (6) Gi Aaxb Av‡e`‡bi Rb¨ cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e|

iæ×Øvi K‡ÿ wePvi (Trial in Camera)

K‡ÿ ‡gvKÏgvi Kvh©µg Abyôvb Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 30

cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ cÖwZôv

‡gvKÏgv I Avwcj ¯’vbvšÍi I ¯’wMZKiY

Av`vj‡Z wePvivaxb †h‡Kvb †gvKvÏgv ev Avwcj ¯’wMZ Ki‡Z cvi‡e| 52

cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev cvwievwiK Avwcj Av`vjZ KZ…©K AšÍe©Z©x Av‡`k

cÖwZwbwa‡`i gva¨‡g Dcw¯’wZ

gymwjg cvwievwiK AvB‡bi weavb‡K cÖfvweZ bv Kiv

KwZcq AvB‡bi weavbvejxi cÖ‡hvR¨Zv I AcÖ‡hvR¨Zv

wewa cÖbq‡bi ÿgZv

The guiding ‘Principle of Law of Inheritance’ under the Dayabhaga

2. evsjv‡`k ebvg ‡mwjg Lvb 18 SCOB [2023] AD 36

iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wbv¤œ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡jv:

The Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district is empowered to

7. Avbmvi I wfwWwci gnvcwiPvjK I Ab¨vb¨ ebvg ‡gvt iæûj Avwgb I

9. Avkivdyj nK (‡gvt) ebvg ‡Pqvig¨vb, `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb I Ab¨vb¨‡`i [75

Ò... If the Commission is not satisfied with wealth statement, there is

ÒThe High Court Division committed serious error in considering the

Ò... the Judges of Sub-ordinate Judiciary, as a whole, are not empowered

12. ivóª ebvg G GBP Gg dzqv` [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 241]

Ò...confessions of a co-accused are generally not admissible, but there are

13. evsjv‡`k weÁvb I wkí M‡elYv cwil` (wewmGmAvBAvi) Gi ‡Pqvig¨vb

“The function of a Court is to interpret a statute according to the intent

Òwe have no hesitation to come to a definite conclusion that the High

14. ivóª ebvg AwgZ nvmvb [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 113]

“It is a general rule of custom or usage practiced in the Appellate

15. evsjv‡`k ebvg Ave`yjøvn dviæK [75 wWGjAvi (GwW) 139]

`yÕc‡ÿi ïbvbx †k‡l Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib,

It appears that the whole proceeding in regards execution and

Moreover, plaintiff No.1 claimed title to the suit land without

The High Court Division while exercising its revisional jurisdiction is

On meticulous and meaningful reading of the aforesaid provision of the

In a Certificate Case, the provision of section 50 of the Ain, 2003 so far

Experience shows that the calculation of interest is a very challenging

3. wmwfj wewea ‡idv‡iÝ bs 11/2022 [17 SCOB (2023) HCD 8]

One of such reasons, as suggested by learned advocates, may be that the

An important and necessary corollary of such a right is to ensure the

On a bare reading of Section 15 of the Customs Act, 1969 it reveals that

Ab¨vb¨ Bmy¨ wb®úwË Ki‡Z wM‡q Av`vjZ e‡jb-

1. 2007 mv‡j wegvb evsjv‡`k K‡c©v‡ikb‡K wegvb evsjv‡`k GqvjvB‡mÝ wjwg‡UW

iv‡qi mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ cª`vb Kiv nj-

[Having gone through the memorandum and articles of association of

`yÕc‡¶i ïbvwb ‡k‡l Av`vjZ gš—e¨ K‡ib –

iv‡q mswkøó Ask wb‡gœ ‡`Iqv n‡jv-

From a careful examination of the relevant provisions of the Customs

[S]ince the number of Judges of this country are very negligible in

`zBc‡¶i hyw³cÖ`vb †k‡l Av`vjZ wb‡¤§v³ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib-