You are on page 1of 3

i40 39th Hybrid Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, Copenhagen – Denmark, 25-28 June 2023

..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/38/Supplement_1/dead093.079/7202585 by guest on 02 January 2024


..
.. SELECTED ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
..
.. SESSION 22: NEW CONCEPTS: POOR RESPONDERS
.. Monday 26 June 2023 Hall D3 15:15 - 16:30
..
..
..
..
..
.. Abstract citation ID: dead093.079
.. O-065 A multi-center randomized controlled trial of intraovarian
.. injection of platelet rich plasma for women with poor ovarian
..
.. response
..
.. N. Herlihy1, Y. Cakiroglu2, C. Whitehead1, A. Reig1, A. Klimczak1,
.. R. Scott1, B. Tiras2, E. Seli1
..
.. 1
IVIRMA New Jersey, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Basking Ridge,
.. U.S.A.
.. 2
.. Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul,
.. Turkey
..
.. Study question: Does intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich
.. plasma (PRP) improve oocyte yield in young patients with poor ovarian re-
..
.. sponse (POR)?
.. Summary answer: Intra-ovarian PRP injection did not result in increased
.. number of oocytes retrieved or improvement of any other relevant measured
..
.. outcomes.
.. What is known already: POR is one of the major hurdles to overcome in
.. patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro
..
.. fertilization (IVF). Several methods have recently emerged to attempt follicular
.. reactivation in these patients with a poor prognosis. One of them, the intra-
.. ovarian injection of autologous PRP, demonstrated promising results in retro-
.. spective and prospective cohort studies.
..
.. Study design, size, duration: This was a multi-center, randomized con-
.. trolled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of PRP in improving IVF outcomes
.. in women with POR. Patients who met inclusion criteria (<38 years, two or
..
.. more prior cycles with < 3 oocytes retrieved, and without single gene disor-
.. ders, prior ovarian surgery, endometriomas, BMI >35, or severe male factor
.. infertility) were randomized to either receive an autologous intra-ovarian PRP
.. injection (PRP group) or no intervention (control group) prior to COH.
..
.. Participants/materials, setting, methods: A total of 83 patients were
.. randomized to PRP group (n ¼ 41) or control group (n ¼ 42). After treat-
.. ment, patients underwent COH, oocyte retrieval, intracytoplasmic sperm
..
.. injection (ICSI), preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and
.. single frozen euploid embryo transfer. Number of MII oocytes obtained was
.. the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve tests
.. (antral follicle count [AFC] and anti-Mullerian hormone [AMH]), blastocyst
..
.. and euploid blastocyst yields, and sustained implantation.
.. Main results and the role of chance: No significant differences were ob-
.. served in number of MII oocytes retrieved (3.1 § 3.3 vs 2.8 § 2.4 in PRP
.. vs control, respectively; p ¼ 0.9), blastocysts (1.3 § 2.1 vs 1.0 § 1.3,
..
.. p ¼ 0.8), or euploid blastocysts (0.9 § 1.6 vs 0.8 § 1.1; p ¼ 0.5) per cycle.
.. Similarly, no differences were observed in the likelihood of obtaining at least
.. one euploid blastocyst (37 vs 45%, p ¼ 0.4; relative risk [RR], 95% confidence
..
.. interval [CI] 0.9, 0.6-1.2) or the rate of sustained implantation (29 vs 31%,
.. p ¼ 0.9; RR 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Pre- and post-treatment AFC in both groups (PRP:
.. from 5.2 § 3.2 to 7.9 § 4.5, p < 0.0001; control: from 5.6 § 3.3 to 6.8
.. § 4.8, p ¼ 0.02) were statistically significantly different, whereas AMH was
39th Hybrid Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, Copenhagen – Denmark, 25-28 June 2023 i41

different in the PRP group only (PRP: 0.73 § 0.46 to 0.99 § 0.98, p ¼ 0.02; ..
control: 0.70 § 0.59 to 0.73 § 0.57, p ¼ 0.59).
..
..
Limitations, reasons for caution: Oocyte retrieval took place the cycle ..
immediately following treatment; therefore, we could not evaluate long-term ..
effects of PRP on ovarian reserve or response. Lack of a placebo group would
..
..
limit interpretability had a difference between groups been observed. The ef- ..
fect of PRP on patients >38 years old was not studied. ..
Wider implications of the findings: Intra-ovarian PRP injection did not
..
..
improve reproductive outcomes by any relevant measure. Our findings do ..
not support wide utilization of PRP to improve IVF outcomes in women with ..
POR. ..

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/38/Supplement_1/dead093.079/7202585 by guest on 02 January 2024


..
Trial registration number: NCT04163640 ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
QUALITY, INNOVATION,
AND SERVICE—IT’S ALL
AT THE CENTER OF
EVERY THING WE DO.
From developing assisted reproductive technologies that maximize performance,
like the first ART media and cultures, to expertise that streamlines productivity,
FUJIFILM Irvine Scientific brings together decades of industry expertise with
a powerhouse of innovation, turning opportunities into realities. Together, we’re
working to support healthy futures—from retrieval to realization.

ALL IN FOR LIFE.


irvinesci.com/ALLIN

FUJIFILM Irvine Scientific and its logo are registered trademarks of FUJIFILM Irvine Scientific, Inc. in various jurisdictions. ©2023 FUJIFILM Irvine Scientific. P/N 018187 Rev.00

You might also like