You are on page 1of 4

[Downloaded free from http://www.jofs.in on Monday, July 07, 2014, IP: 155.97.178.

73] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal

Review Article
Anterior point of reference: Current
knowledge and perspectives in
prosthodontics
Prince Kumar, Ashish Kumar1, Roshni Goel2, Ashish Khattar3
Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and Research
Centre, and 1ITS Dental College, 2Conservatice Dentistry and Endodontics, IDST Dental College, Modinagar,
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 3Private Practitioner, Pitampura, New Delhi, India

ABSTRACT
The opening and closing mandibular axis is not a purely theoretical postulation, but an
absolutely demonstrable biomechanical entity. It is very crucial to accurately record and
transfer to articulators for the purpose of maxillofacial rehabilitation. Following the Face
bow record and transfer of the mandibular axis to an anatomic articulator, we can then
mount the casts so that they open and close on the articulator in the same fashion as the
patient’s jaws. For this reason one of the fixed factors presented by the patient is taken into
the consideration, which if properly considered, can be of inestimable value in all phases
of dental treatment. This paper has sought to review the current concepts and practical
implications regarding anterior point of reference in prosthodontics.

Key words: Alae, anterior point of reference, nasion, orbitale

INTRODUCTION which, together with an anterior reference


point, establish the horizontal reference
Orientation of the maxillary cast in an plane.[4‑8]
articulator is a crucial part of several
techniques used in dentistry. Its primary Clinical significance of face bow
objectives are the restoration of occlusion record transfer
in well controlled form and position If the maxillary cast is positioned
of the teeth. The maxillary cast in the without the correct maxillae‑hinge axis
articulator is the baseline from which all relationship, arcs of movement in the
occlusal relationships start, and it should articulator will occur which differ from
be positioned in space by identifying those of the patient. Moreover, the
Address for correspondence:
Dr. Prince Kumar,
three points of different orientation which authentication of the mandibular cast
Department of Prosthodontics, cannot be on the same line.[1‑3] The plane spatial position by using interocclusal
Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and
Research Centre, N.H. 24, is formed by two points located posterior records made at increased vertical
to the maxillae and one point located dimensions of occlusion will not be easy
Masuri, Ghaziabad,
Uttar Pradesh-201302, India.
E‑mail: princekumar@its.edu.in
anterior to them. Horizontal plane of unless subsequent records are the same
Access this article online reference is plane established on the face thickness. An occlusion that is restored
of the patient by one anterior reference to an incorrect arc of closure or opening
Website:
www.jofs.in point and two posterior reference points axis may have interceptive and deflective
DOI: from which measurements of the posterior tooth contacts in the hinge‑closing
10.4103/0975-8844.106195 anatomic determinants of occlusion and movement if there are subsequent
Quick Response Code: mandibular motion are made. Anterior changes in the vertical dimension of
reference point is the point located on the occlusion. Deflective contacts also may be
mid face that, together with two posterior present in functional and parafunctional
reference points, establishes a reference lateral movements from the time the
plane. Whereas posterior reference points restoration is initially inserted. Such
are located one on each side of the face in contacts are undesirable in either
the area of the transverse horizontal axis, natural or artificial occlusions and can

Journal of Orofacial Sciences


96
Vol. 4 • Issue 2 • December 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.jofs.in on Monday, July 07, 2014, IP: 155.97.178.73] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal

Kumar, et al.: Anterior point of reference

contribute to periodontal trauma, muscle spasm and Alternative method


TMJ pain.[9,10] The face‑bow itself is raised to the axis‑orbital plane
on the patient. A metal arm attached to the maxillary
Prognostic role of anterior reference points record base is rigidly fixed by plaster in a cup that also
The selection of the anterior point of the triangular attaches to a vertical support arm on the face‑bow and
spatial plane determines which plane in the head will subsequently to a vertical support arm on the articulator.
become the plane of reference when the prosthesis is The relationship of these two vertical support arms to
being fabricated. When three points are used the position the hinge line is identical. Therefore the record base
can be repeated, so that different maxillary casts of the which is rigidly fixed to the vertical arm attachment can
same patient can be positioned in the articulator in the be transferred from the patient to the articulator. This
same relative position to the end‑controlling guidances. will relate the maxillary cast to the axis‑orbital plane or
It also determines the level at which the casts are to any other plane with which the face‑bow is paralleled
mounted which governs the future esthetic factor on the patient.
related to patient’s denture visibility.[10,11]
Orbitale minus 7 mm
Various anterior reference points The Frankfort horizontal plane passes through both
Accurate selection of the reference point is a very critical the poria and one orbital point. Because porion is
step in oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation procedures. a skeletal landmark, Sicher’ recommended to use the
One should have thorough knowledge of the following midpoint of the upper border of the external auditory
anterior points and the rationale for the selection of meatus as the posterior cranial landmark on a patient.
each[12] [Figure 1].
• Orbitale (B) Located by Hanau face bow with help
of orbital pointer
• Orbitale minus 7 mm. (C) This plane represents
Frankfort plane
• Nasion (A) minus 23mm Used with quick mount
face bow (Whip mix)
• Ala of nose (D) This plane represents campers
plane
• 43 mm superior from lower border of upper lip/
lateral incisor (Denar reference plane locator/
artexmeter).
• Incisal edge plus articulator midpoint to articulator
axis: Horizontal plane distance 6.

Orbitale
Figure 1: Various anterior reference points
Orbitale is the lowest point of the infraorbital rim of
skull which can be palpated on the patient through the
overlying tissues and the skin. One orbitale and the two
posterior points that determine the horizontal axis of
rotation will define the axis – orbital plane.[11]

Clinical implications of “Orbitale”


Orbitale and the two posterior landmarks defining the
plane are transferred from the patient to the articulator
with the face‑bow. The articulator must have an orbital
indicator guide. Relating the maxillae to this plane will
slightly lower the maxillary cast from the position that
would be established if the Frankfort horizontal plane
were used. Practically, the axis‑orbital plane is used
because of the ease of locating the marking orbitale and
because the concept is easy to teach and understand.
Orbitale is transferred from the patient to this guide by
Figure 2: Position of orbital pointer on the anterior cross arm of
means of the orbital pointer on the anterior cross arm of the face-bow during face bow transfer on Hanau semi adjustable
the face‑bow[11‑13] [Figure 2]. articulator

Journal of Orofacial Sciences


97
Vol. 4 • Issue 2 • December 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.jofs.in on Monday, July 07, 2014, IP: 155.97.178.73] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal

Kumar, et al.: Anterior point of reference

Most articulators do not have a reference point for this same distance is measured above the existing or planed
landmark. Gonzalez’ pointed out that this posterior incisal edges on the patient, and its uppermost point is
tissue landmark on the average lies 7 mm superior to marked as the anterior point of reference on the face.
the horizontal axis.[1] The recommended compensation This point can be recorded for future use by measuring
for this discrepancy is to mark the anterior point of vertically downward to it from the inner canthus of the
reference 7 mm below orbitale on the patient or to position eye and recording this measurement. The inner canthus
the orbital pointer 7 mm above the orbital indicator of is used because it is accessible unchanging landmark on
the articulator. Later on Bergstrom developed Arcon the head. It must be documented that this method does
articulator that automatically compensates for this not relate the Frankfort plane or the axis‑orbital plane
error by placing the orbital index 7 mm higher than parallel to the horizontal plane. Additionally, only the
the condylar horizontal axis. In either technique, the incisal edges or the most anterior portion of the occlusal
Frankfort horizontal plane of the patient becomes the plane will be midway between the upper and lower
horizontal plane of reference in the articulator.[5] articulator arms.[19,20]

Nasion minus 23 mm Alae of the nose


This reference point is widely used with Whip Mix In most of the conventional complete denture techniques
Face Bow. The nasion can be approximately located in it is imperative to make tentative or the actual
the head as the deepest part of the midline depression occlusal plane parallel with the horizontal plane. This
just below the level of the eyebrows. The nasion guide, relationship can be achieved as a line from the ala of the
or positioner, or relator of the Quick Mount face‑bow, nose to the center of the auditory meatus that describes
which is specially designed to be used with the Whip‑Mix Camper’s line. An alternative method of establishing
Articulator, fits into this depression. This nasion relator this relationship is to make a wax occlusion rim parallel
can be moved only in an in and out motion and not to Camper’s line on the face. The desired location for
in up and down, from its attachment to the face‑bow the maxillary incisal edge should be marked on the wax
crossbar. The crossbar is located 23 mm below the occlusion rim as an initial step in determination of the
midpoint of the nasion positioner. When the face‑bow is occlusal plane. This actually assures that the tentative
positioned anteriorly by the nasion relator, the crossbar occlusal plane will not be too high or low.[11,15]
will be in the approximate region of orbitale.[11‑15]
The face‑bow crossbar and not the nasion relator is the Selection of anterior reference point: Practical
actual anterior reference point locator. While donig the considerations
face‑bow transfer, the crossbar of the face‑bow supports Selection of the right anterior point of reference is highly
the upper frame of the Whip‑Mix articulator. The subjective which necessitate special attention during its
inferior surface of the frame is in the same plane as the selection. A well designed and precise selection of the
articulator’s hinge points. From this it can be concluded anterior reference point will allow the dentist to clearly
that the Quick Mount face‑bow used with the Whip‑Mix visualize the anterior teeth and the occlusion in the
articulator employs an approximate axis‑orbital plane. articulator in the same frame of reference that would be
That is why; locating the orbital point with this method used when looking at the patient. The objective is usually to
is largely dependent upon the large nasion relator, the achieve a natural appearance in the form and the position of
morphologic characteristics of the nasion notch, and the the anterior teeth. Articulating the maxillary cast relative
inconsistency of the nasion‑orbitale measurement from to the Frankfort horizontal plane will attain this goal.[20‑24]
23 mm in the patient.[15‑17] When this reference plane is used, the teeth will be viewed
as though the patient were standing in a normal postural
Incisal edge plus articulator midpoint to position with the eyes looking straight ahead. One of very
articulator axis‑horizontal plane distance common dilemma occurs between the dentist and the
A reasonable and consistent position for the master casts laboratory technicians when they apply different objectives
in the articulator would be one which would position to the same patient. The dentist may very well have
the plane of occlusion near the mid‑horizontal plane of positioned the maxillary cast in relation to the Frankfort
the articulator. Any deviation and divergence from this horizontal plane or used one of the other more superior
scheme may position the casts high or low relative to anterior points of reference.[25‑27] Laboratory personnel may
the instrument’s upper and lower arms.[14,18] The overall then proceed to establish the occlusal plane parallel to the
deleterious effect of these positions may be inaccurate horizontal or parallel to the upper and lower articulator
and vague occlusal relationships due to dimensional arms. The result will be an occlusal plane that drops from
changes in the gypsum products used for cast‑articulating anterior to posterior when placed in the patient’s mouth.
purposes. In accordance with this concept, the distance The consequences of the contrary circumstances will also be
from the articulator’s mid‑horizontal plane to the disadvantageous to the patient. Camper’s line can be used
articulator’s axis‑horizontal plane is measured. This as the reference for the articulation of maxillary cast.[11,15]

Journal of Orofacial Sciences


98
Vol. 4 • Issue 2 • December 2012
[Downloaded free from http://www.jofs.in on Monday, July 07, 2014, IP: 155.97.178.73] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal

Kumar, et al.: Anterior point of reference

The laboratory technician may then arrange the anterior 10. Lundstrom F, Lundstrom A. Natural head position as a basis
teeth and the occlusal plane as though the Frankfort for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1992;101:244‑7.
horizontal plane were being used. The result will be an 11. Ercoli C, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Galindo D. Face‑bow record
occlusal plane that rises severely from anterior to posterior without a third point of reference. Theoretical considerations and
in the patient’s mouth and maxillary anterior teeth that an alternative technique. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:237‑41.
may be excessively positioned lingually. The following 12. Bailey JO Jr, Nowlin TP. Evaluation of the third point of reference
for mounting maxillary casts on the Hanau articulator. J Prosthet
technique can be used as more convenient, practical and
Dent 1984;51:199‑201.
less time‑consuming alternative option:[28‑31] 13. Pitchford JH. A reevaluation of the axis‑orbital plane and the
• If the Camper’s line‑horizontal reference plane is use of orbitale in a facebow transfer record. J Prosthet Dent
used, raise the back of the articulator to achieve the 1991;66:349‑55.
effect of the Frankfort horizontal plane mounting 14. Gonzales JB, Kingery RH. Evaluation of planes of reference
for orienting maxillary casts on articulators. J Am Dent Assoc
• If the Frankfort horizontal plane reference is used,
1968;76:329‑36.
raise the anterior of the articulator to achieve the 15. Galindo D, Tallents RH, Graser GN, Ercoli C. Face‑bow record
effect of paralleling the occlusal plane and Camper’s without a third point of reference: Theoretical considerations and
line with the horizontal. an alternative technique. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:237‑41.
16. Bergstrom G. On the reproduction of dental articulation by means
of articulators. Acta Odontol Scand Suppl 1950;9:3‑149.
CONCLUSION 17. McWilliam JS, Rausen R. Analysis of variance in assessing
registrations of natural head position. Swed Dent J 1982;15:239.
As we all know that three points in space determine 18. Krueger GE, Schneider RL. A plane of orientation with an extracranial
the position of the maxillary cast in an articulator. anterior point of reference. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:56‑60.
19. Frankel R. The applicability of the occipital reference base in
So the dentists especially Prosthodontists are more
cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1980;77:379.
repeatedly concerned with selecting the posterior two of 20. Beck. A clinical evaluation of the Arcon concept of articulation. J
the three reference points. Though one must be aware Prosthet Dent 1959;9:409.
of the relative significance of posterior reference points 21. Augsburger KI. Occlusal plane relation to facial type. J Prosthet
and should consider anterior reference point as one of Dent 1953;75:5.
22. Bjerin R. A comparison between the Franklorr horizontal and the
the critical dimension during face bow transfer. Such Sella Turcica‑Nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis.
assessment will definitely affect the development of Acta Odontol Scand 1957;1:15.
normal occlusion and associated dentofacial aesthetics. 23. Downs WB. The role of cephaiometrics in orthodontics. Case
Furthermore dentist must have thorough knowledge of analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952;38:162.
these reference planes and points and should utilize them 24. Lundstrom A. Head posture in relation to slope of the sella‑nasion
line. Angle Orthod 1982;5:279.
depending on the case without any misunderstanding 25. Brandrup‑Wognsen T. Face‑bow, its significance and application.
with the laboratory personals. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3:618‑30.
26. Dos Santos Junior J, Nelson SJ, Nummikoski P. Geometric analysis
REFERENCES of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear‑rod facebow
transfer. J Prosthodont 1996;5:172‑81.
27. Olsson A, Posselt U. Relationship of various skull reference lines.
1. Wilkie ND. The anterior point of reference. J Prosthet Dent
J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:1045‑9.
1979;41:488‑96.
28. Hanau RL. Articulation defined, analyzed and formulated. J Am Dent
2. Weinberg IA. An evaluation of the face‑bow mounting. J Prosthet
Assoc 1926;13:1694‑707.
Dent 1961;11:32.
29. Freitas A de. A comparison of the radiographic and prosthetic
3. Page HL. The cranial plane. Dent Digest 1955;61:152.
4. Foster TD, Howat AP, Naish PJ. Variation in cephalometric reference measurement of the sagittal path movement of the mandibular
lines. Br J Orthod 1981;8:183. condyle. J Oral Surg 1970;30:631‑8.
5. McCollum BB. The mandibular hinge axis and a method of locating it. 30. Owen EB. Condyle path: Its limited value in occlusion. J Am Dent
J Prosthet Dent 1960;10:428‑35. Assoc 1948;36:284‑90.
6. Lauritzen AG, Wolford LW. Hinge axis location on an experimental 31. Kumar JS, Gupta G, Bansal S, Gupta P. Variability and validity of
basis. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:1059‑67. the anterior point of reference”: A cephalometric study. Baba Farid
7. Zarb GA, Bergman B, Clayton JA, MacKay HF. Prosthetic treatment Uni Dent J 2011;2:107-11.
for partially edentulous patients. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Co.,
1978. p. 193.
How to cite this article: Kumar P, Kumar A, Goel R, Khattar A.
8. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. 8th ed. J Prosthet Dent Anterior point of reference: Current knowledge and perspectives in
2005;94:10‑92 prosthodontics. J Orofac Sci 2012;4:96-9.
9. Solow B, Tallgren A. Natural head position in standing subjects.
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared
Acta Odontol Stand 1971;29:591.

Journal of Orofacial Sciences


99
Vol. 4 • Issue 2 • December 2012

You might also like