Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article
Article
net/publication/281251460
CITATIONS READS
7 205
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hervé Laurent on 24 November 2015.
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to investigate the thermo-mechanical behaviour of rubbers between
−40◦ C and 100◦ C. Several experimental tests (tension and compression cyclic loadings and relaxation) have
been performed to examine the temperature influence on the rubber behaviour. An original phenomenologi-
cal model, named hyper-visco-hysteresis, is also presented. This model, implemented in a laboratory code, is
based on additive decomposition of stress contributions. Material constants have been deduced from experi-
mental data and the constitutive model seems to be adequateness to describe the stress-strain evolution of the
studied elastomer under various mechanical loadings at different temperatures.
1
(a)
shows substantially non-linear visco-elasticity and
4
displays large deformations under small stresses. All
3
tests were performed at constant temperature under
2
strain control using an Instron tensile testing machine
0.5
−15°C
−20 −20°C
0 −25°C
−30°C
−40 −35°C
−0.5
−1 −60
−1.5 −80
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
−2 Stretch
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Stretch Figure 2: Uniaxial tension and compression experi-
ments during first cycle in function of temperature:
Figure 1: Stress-stretch response during five cycles
(a) between 100◦ C and 0◦ C, (b) between −15◦ C and
of tension and compression loading at room tempera-
−35◦ C.
ture.
From room temperature up to 100◦ C, the stud-
At room temperature, rubber like materials show ied rubber presents a visco-hyperelastic-hysteretic be-
a visco-hyperelastic behaviour. The viscosity is illus- haviour which seems to be not sensitive to the temper-
trated by the hysteresis represented by a part of the ature variations (Figure2.(a)).
area exhibited between loading and unloading stress-
strain curves (Figure 1). The cyclic loading tests con- Figure 2.(b) shows that the material response is
sisted to load and unload a specimen successively five non-linearly dependent on temperature. The glass
times up to 30% in compression and up to 50% in ten- transition temperature Tg (near −19◦ C) represents
sion. an evident threshold between a visco-elastic and an
elasto-visco-plastic behaviours. The glassy state is ac-
2.3 Influence of temperature companied by the complete loss of rubber elastic-
ity. Bellow Tg , the no viscous anelastic behaviour is
The dependence of the mechanical material proper- revealed by a remaining deformation after unload-
ties on the temperature has been investigated. We ing. This ”plasticity” phenomenon increases at the ex-
achieved a set of uniaxial experiments consisting on pense of elasticity when the temperature decreases.
submitting a specimen to a cycle loading and unload-
ing both in compression and tension at various pre-
scribed temperatures (Figure 2). The temperature lev- 2.4 Relaxation test in function of temperature
els above 23◦ C were generated by electrical heating To examine the temperature influence on the material
and the lower temperature levels by using saturated relaxation, stress relaxation tests at different temper-
nitrogen steam. atures were performed with a specific experimental
In order to check the homogeneity of the temper- set-up. These tests also allowed the characterisation
ature distribution, a specimen tested was equipped of the material viscosity. A specimen was compressed
with a thermocouple in a hole drilled in its centre up to 30% of deformation between grips of a precision
and the mechanical loading was applied one hour af- vice equipped with load cell of 5kN (Figure 3). This
ter switching on the heating chamber. experimental set-up was introduced in a temperature-
2
controlled chamber (Figure 4) where it was kept dur- 500 60
ing 1.5 days and where it was submitted to temper- 450 Force
Evolution of temperature 40
ature variations in range of −30◦ C and 50◦ C as in-
400
dicated by Figure 5. This graph also shows the cor-
20
Temperature (°C)
responding evolution of the force as function of the 350
Force (N)
time. It exhibits a no-negligible loss in the force re-
300 0
sulted from the applied deformation at the end of the
test. This phenomenon can be at the origin of environ- 250
−20
mental or security disasters for example in the case of 200
a rubber seal used in high-pressure hydraulic system. −40
150
specimen load cell 100 −60
0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1e+06 1.2e+06
Time (seconds)
E1 η1
η2
E2
σ viscosity σ v
3
these contributions, written in parallel: the reference point is the previous inversion state
as long as any crossing point is not detected.
σ = σe + σv + σh ε = ε e = ε v = εh (1)
−2µh
In this decomposition, the first hyper-viscous con- • β = 0 Q )np (Q 2−np
where Q∆σ =
tribution behaviours, decribed after, are classical but, (ω 0 ∆σ )
tr(∆tr S : ∆tr S) is relative to the intensity of
p
in this paper, we introduce the hysteresis contribution t
which represents an original work. ∆r S,
To consider the rate-sensitive material behaviour,
viscosity behaviour σ v is formulated with two • φ = Q∆σ .Q0 represents the non-reversible intrin-
Maxwell’s models in parallel : two springs (carac- sic dissipated rate,
terised by Young Modulus E1 and E2 ) and two dash-
pots in parallel (with η1 and η2 their viscosity) (Figure • the parameter ω 0 denotes the Masing similarity
6). function. For our experimental tests, we have ra-
For the hyperelastic contribution σ e , we use clas- dial loading path and ω 0 is equal to 2 (in other
sical Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic potential. But an al- cases, see (Favier 1988)).
ternative definition is introduced in the isotropic part
under the form : • the material parameters are coefficient µh which
represents the initial slope, the yield hysteresis
limit in shear Q0 and the Prager’s parameter np.
ρ0 ψm (B) =C10 .(I¯1 − 3) + C01 .(I¯2 − 3)
(2) The management of the inversion point and cross-
ing point is carried out using the intrinsic dissipation
µ ¶
1 + lnJ
+ K. 1 − rate function defined previously. This value is related
J
to a volume element and must always be positive;
where ρ0 is the relative density to zero stress ; ψm is thus, the state at time t is an inversion point when the
the Helmholtz free energy by mass unity ; the material function φ becomes negative.
constants are C10 , C01 ; K is the bulk modulus and J, This constitutive model is compatible with the dis-
I¯1 and I¯2 are the strain invariants defined as follows: sipation principle of thermodynamics (Blès 2002).
C01 , C10 , K and Q0 are supposed not function of tem-
√ 1 h
2
i perature but all other material parameters are thermo-
J = det B ; I¯1 = T rB2 ; I¯2 = . I¯1 − T r(B2.B2) dependent.
2
(3) The elasto-visco-hysteretic model has been
where B2 = J −2/3
B is the isovolume part of strain implemented in Finite Element software named
tensor B. The invariant J is the total volume change HEREZH++(http://www-lg2m.univ-ubs.fr/rio 2005),
Vt
. developed in our laboratory.
V0
For the hysteresis behaviour, rheological models The combination of all experimental data presented
containing elastic and slip elements are considered before in paragraph 2, allowed us an identification of
to be derived from a general pure hysteresis model material constants introduced in this model.
(Guélin 1980). The material is assumed to be isotropic
and the hysteresis contribution, denoted by S, is only 4 IDENTIFICATION OF BEHAVIOUR MODEL -
deviatoric. The hysteresis model, adapted to cyclic RESULTS
loading condition, is composed of an incremental The material constants introduced in the hyperelasto-
behaviour law (constitutive law) and an inversion visco-hysteretic model were identified by a least-
management algorithm and crossing point during the square minimisation method. We used the optimisa-
cyclic evolution path. The constitutive relation is ob- tion parameter software SiDoLo (Foerch et al. 1997)
tained by time integration of relation: in link with the finite element software HEREZH++.
. The identification was carried out on only one hex-
S = 2µh D̄ + β φ(S, D̄) ∆tr S (4) ahedral finite element using experimental data in-
cluding relaxation and loading-unloading tension-
In this relation:
compression tests.
• D̄ denotes the deviatoric strain rate tensor, At room temperature, the identified parameters lead
to numerical results which are compared with exper-
• ∆tr S describes evolution of deviatoric stress be- imental data in Figures 7 and 8. A good agreement
tween a reference state situation r and current is observed in the case of traction/compression load-
time t. At the begining of the loading, the ref- ing as it can be seen in Figure 7 that shows evolu-
erence state is the initial state. For other paths, tion of stresses versus stretches. However, Figure 8
4
1.5 15
10
1.0
5
Nominal Sress (MPa)
5
2.5 in the case of shear cyclic loading. Archives of Me-
Experimental data
2 Numerical simulation chanics 54(2), 155174.
1.5
Chadwick, P. 1973. Thermo-mechanics of rubberlike
Nominal Sress (MPa)
−0.3
Lion, A. 1996. A physically based method to rep-
−0.4 resent the thermo-mechanical behaviour of elas-
−0.5 tomers. Acta Mechanica 123, 1–25.
−0.6 Lion, A. 1997. On the large deformation behaviour of
−0.7 reinforced rubber at different temperatures. Journal
−0.8 of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 45(11-12),
−0.9
1805–1834.
−1 Manach, P. Y., D. Favier, & G. Rio 1996. Finite ele-
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 ment simulations of internal stresses generated dur-
time (seconds) ing the pseudoelastic deformation of niti bodies. J.
Figure 11: Comparison between experimental data de Physique C1(6), 244–253.
and numerical results at room temperature in relax- Rio, G., P. Y. Manach, & D. Favier 1995. Finite el-
ation at 18%. ement simulation of 3D mechanical behaviour of
NiTi shape memory alloys. Archives of Mechan-
tive good agreement has been obtained between ex- ics 47(3), 537–556.
perimental and numerical results. However, further Shaw, J. A., A. S. Jones, & A. S. Wineman 2005.
analyses are necessary to adapt this model to more Chemorheological response of elastomers at ele-
complex thermal and mechanical loadings. This work vated temperatures: Experiments and simulations.
is a first step up to a complete representation of the Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 53,
complicated thermo mechanical behaviour of elas- 2758–2793.
tomers. Tourabi, A., P. Guélin, & D. Favier 1995. Towards
modelling of deformable ferromagnets and ferro-
6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS electrics. Archives of Mechanics 47(3), 437–483.
The authors are grateful for the support and the finan- Treloar, L. 1975. The physics of Rubber elasticity.
cial participation of Brittany region. Clarendon Press.
REFERENCES
Blès, G. 2002. Bases thermomécaniques de la
modélisation du comportement des matériaux tissés
et des polymères solides. Thèse de doctorat, Thèse
de Doctorat de l’Université Joseph Fourier - Greno-
ble I.
Blès, G., S. P. Gadaj, W. K. Nowacki, & A. Tourabi
2002. Experimental study of a pa66 solid polymer
6
View publication stats