Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Initial data
Value Units Variable Parameter
0.100 m D Height of the rectangular section
285 mm L Length of the lever arm (pivot to hanging mass)
0.076 m B Width of the block
998 m3/kg 𝛾 Specific weight of water
250 mm H Distance from pivot to bottom of block
Data Table
Partially Depth Mass Pressure Force W theory y exper y theory
Submerged (mm) (g) (eq 3) (eq 7) (eq 5) (eq 6)
1 42 50 0.0665 0.0046 0.2139 0.2360 9.4%
2 50.5 70 0.0961 0.0067 0.2071 0.2332 11.2%
3 62 100 0.1449 0.0100 0.1963 0.2293 14.4%
4 72.5 130 0.1981 0.0136 0.1866 0.2258 17.4%
5 84 170 0.2660 0.0181 0.1818 0.2220 18.1%
(a) What is the purpose of having precise circular arcs to the quadrant block? (Hint: What is the moment create
Because the buoyant force acts towards the center of rotation, by using the circular arc, there won't be any to
(b) What are the differences you see between the measurements and the theoretical prediction? What are the
The differences tend to vary by around 10-20% of the theoretical value, which is a little high, but not too terrib
(c) Why does the shape of the curve change, when the rectangular end becomes fully submerged?
Because there is some pressure of the water acting down on the block now too, and some additional surface a
(d) If the experiment was repeated using a liquid with a higher specific gravity, what differences would you see
They would be more steep, because the density would be higher
Chart Title
0.2400
0.2350
0.2300
Plot of Depth vs mass
0.2250
0.2200
0.2150
0.1800 0.1850 0.1900 0.1950 0.2000 0.2050 0.2100 0.2150 0.2200
Chart Title
0.2016
Plot of Depth vs y 0.2014
0.2012
0.2010
0.2008
0.2006
0.2004
70 80 90 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
submerged?
some additional surface area
fferences would you see between the new and old (water) curves?
top of our device