The answer to your very first question from the 4 I provided for interview, “tell me about yourself”, is

that you can give a brief introduction of yourself and highlight your main qualifications and
achievements. You can mention your academic background, your research interests, your previous
experiences, and your future plans. You can also explain why you are interested in CERN and what you
hope to learn from the internship. Here is an example of how you can answer this question:

Hello, my name is [your name] and I am a law student at the University of Punjab, Gujranwala, and I am
expected to complete my LL.B (Hons) degree in 2025. I have a strong interest in the intersection of law
and science, and I want to fix the gap between law and administration. I have a solid academic
background in law, with a focus on human rights, intellectual property, and environmental law. I have
also completed some MOOC courses on international criminal law, citizenship and rule of law, and
negotiation skills. I have some skills and knowledge that I can use for this purpose, such as legal
research, legal writing, legal analysis, critical thinking, negotiation skills, communication skills, legal
ethics, and legal precedent research. I also have some experience in working with scientific topics and
institutions, such as a research project on the legal and ethical implications of gene editing, and an
internship at the National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering. I am fluent in English,
Urdu, and French, and I have some language expertise in both speaking and writing. I am also a member
of the moot court team and the law society at my university, and I have participated in some debates
and events on national and international issues. I am enthusiastic, adaptable, and open-minded, and I
am ready to take on new challenges and opportunities.

I am very excited to apply for the CERN Administrative Student Program as a law student, as I think it is a
unique opportunity to learn from the world-leading organization in the field of particle physics and a
pioneer in international cooperation. I am impressed by the cutting-edge research and experiments that
CERN conducts, such as the Large Hadron Collider, the discovery of the Higgs boson, and the antimatter
research. I am also inspired by the cooperation and coordination that CERN achieves among the
member states and the international partners, and the dissemination and communication that CERN
provides to the public and the stakeholders. I hope to gain from this experience some new skills and
knowledge that I need for my goal of fixing the gap between law and administration, such as the
technical and scientific aspects of particle physics, the legal and administrative systems and processes of
CERN, and the cultural and linguistic diversity of the organization. I also hope to gain from this
experience some personal and professional development, such as improving my communication and
teamwork skills, expanding my network and connections, and enhancing my confidence and
competence.

I can shorten the process section and lengthen the findings and solution section of the answer to the
2nd question, where you can tell me about a project you’re proud of and why. Here is how you can do
that:
One project that I am proud of is the research project on the gap between law and administration that I
completed as part of my course on citizenship and rule of law. The topic of the project was the gap
between law and administration, and the objective was to explore the causes, effects, and solutions of
this gap, and how it relates to the work of CERN and the field of particle physics. My role and
contribution was to conduct a comprehensive literature review on the current state and trends of the
gap between law and administration, and the existing legal frameworks and policies that address it. I
also conducted a case study on the legal and administrative aspects of the Large Hadron Collider, and
the challenges and opportunities that it poses for the gap between law and administration. I then
proposed some recommendations and solutions to fix the gap between law and administration, and to
improve the legal and administrative performance and cooperation of CERN and the field of particle
physics. I presented my findings and results in a written report and an oral presentation, and I received
positive feedback and evaluation from my instructor and peers.

The process and the methods that I used or followed for the project were as follows:

• I used various sources and tools to conduct legal research, such as online databases, libraries,
journals, books, reports, etc. I searched for relevant and reliable information and data on the
gap between law and administration and its causes, effects, and solutions, using keywords,
filters, and citations. I also used some tools to organize and manage my research, such as
Zotero, Mendeley, and Google Docs.
• I synthesized and organized my research, using summarizing, paraphrasing, outlining, and
mapping techniques. I identified the main arguments and perspectives that the sources
presented, and compared and contrasted them. I also categorized and grouped the sources
according to the themes and topics that they covered, and created a logical and coherent
structure for my report and presentation.
• I faced some challenges or difficulties in conducting and synthesizing my research, such as the
complexity and dynamism of the legal and administrative environment, the diversity and
plurality of the legal and administrative actors, the autonomy and discretion of the legal and
administrative actors, and the political and ideological influences on the legal and administrative
systems and processes. I found or made some solutions or improvements to overcome or
resolve these challenges or difficulties, such as using critical thinking and reasoning skills to
analyze and evaluate the sources, using multiple and interdisciplinary sources to cross-check
and triangulate the information and data, and using clear and precise language to communicate
and explain the legal and administrative concepts and terms.
• I used various sources and tools to conduct a case study on the legal and administrative aspects
of the Large Hadron Collider, and the challenges and opportunities that it poses for the gap
between law and administration. I selected this example because I think it is relevant and
interesting, as it is one of the most advanced and complex scientific projects in the world, and it
involves many legal and administrative issues and questions, such as the safety and security, the
funding and management, the cooperation and coordination, and the communication and
dissemination of the Large Hadron Collider. I also used some tools to collect and analyze some
data and information on the Large Hadron Collider, such as the CERN website, the CERN
Document Server, and the CERN Open Data Portal.
• I applied legal rules and principles to the case study, and interpreted and evaluated legal sources
and authorities. I identified the legal issues and questions that the case study raised, and the
 legal frameworks and policies that applied to them, such as the CERN Convention, the Host State
Agreements, and the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor Agreement. I also
compared and contrasted different legal perspectives and approaches, and identified and
resolved legal conflicts and gaps.
• I faced some challenges or difficulties in analyzing and applying the legal rules and principles to
the case study, such as the ambiguity and variability of the legal definitions and classifications,
the lack of legal consensus and coordination, and the inadequacy and inefficiency of legal
oversight and remedies. I found or made some solutions or improvements to address or
mitigate these challenges or difficulties, such as using legal interpretation and argumentation
skills to clarify and justify the legal positions and opinions, using legal harmonization and
integration skills to align and harmonize the legal rules and principles, and using legal innovation
and adaptation skills to update and improve the legal frameworks and policies.
• I used various sources and tools to propose some recommendations and solutions to fix the gap
between law and administration, and to improve the legal and administrative performance and
cooperation of CERN and the field of particle physics. I consulted some sources that provide
some guidance and suggestions on how to deal with the gap between law and administration,
such as the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and the
United Nations. I also used some tools to design and implement some solutions that can help fix
the gap between law and administration, such as the Ethical Matrix, the Stakeholder Analysis,
and the Policy Cycle.
• I formulated and presented my recommendations and solutions, using prioritizing, evaluating,
and selecting techniques, and using evidence and citations to support and justify them. I also
considered the implications and applications of my recommendations and solutions, and the
future directions and recommendations that I suggested or followed. I presented my
recommendations and solutions in a written report and an oral presentation, using proper
format, style, and language, and using visual aids and graphics to enhance my communication.
The outcome and the impact of the project were as follows:

• I found out that the gap between law and administration is a discrepancy and divergence
between the legal and administrative systems, such as the legal rules and principles that govern
the administration and the actual practices and behaviors of the administrative actors, the legal
norms and values that underpin the administration and the administrative norms and values
that shape the legal system, and the legal and administrative perspectives and methods of
analyzing and solving problems. I also found out that the gap between law and administration is
caused by various factors, such as the complexity and dynamism of the legal and administrative
environment, the diversity and plurality of the legal and administrative actors, the autonomy
and discretion of the legal and administrative actors, and the political and ideological influences
on the legal and administrative systems and processes. I also found out that the gap between
law and administration has various consequences, such as the erosion of the rule of law and the
protection of fundamental rights and liberties, the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the
administration and the legal system, and the dissatisfaction and distrust of the public and the
stakeholders. I also proposed some recommendations and solutions to fix the gap between law
and administration, and to improve the legal and administrative performance and cooperation
of CERN and the field of particle physics, such as the development and implementation of legal
 frameworks and policies, the establishment and enforcement of legal oversight and remedies,
and the promotion and facilitation of legal education and dialogue.
• I supported and justified my findings and results with evidence and citations from various
sources, such as the reports and statistics from the World Bank, the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development, and the United Nations, the articles and books from the scholars
and experts, the declarations and resolutions from the organizations and institutions, and the
cases and judgments from the courts and tribunals. I also used some data and information from
the CERN website, the CERN Document Server, and the CERN Open Data Portal to illustrate and
explain the legal and administrative aspects of the Large Hadron Collider, and the challenges and
opportunities that it poses for the gap between law and administration.
• I received positive feedback and evaluation from my instructor and peers, who reviewed and
commented on my report and presentation. They praised and appreciated my work, and gave
me some constructive criticism and suggestions. They said that my work was informative,
comprehensive, and persuasive, and that I demonstrated a good understanding and knowledge
of the gap between law and administration and its relation to the work of CERN and the field of
particle physics. They also said that my work could be improved by addressing some limitations
and weaknesses, such as the lack of empirical evidence and data, the bias and subjectivity of
some sources and arguments, and the feasibility and desirability of some recommendations and
solutions. I also reflected and assessed my work, and I was satisfied and proud of my work, and I
recognized some strengths and achievements, such as the quality and quantity of my research
output, the skills and knowledge that I demonstrated and acquired, and the interests and
motivations that I expressed and developed. I also identified some areas and opportunities for
improvement, such as the need to conduct more empirical research and data collection, the
need to use more diverse and interdisciplinary sources and arguments, and the need to test and
implement some recommendations and solutions.
• I earned some achievements or recognitions from my work, such as a high grade, a certificate,
and a recommendation letter from my instructor, and a publication or a presentation
opportunity from a journal or a conference. I also shared some achievements or recognitions
from my work, such as a blog post, a podcast, and a social media post, where I disseminated and
communicated my work to the wider audiences and stakeholders, and received some responses
and reactions from them.
• I suggested some implications and applications of my work, such as how my work can contribute
to the advancement and improvement of the legal and administrative research and practice,
and how my work can inform and influence the legal and administrative decision-making and
policy-making on the gap between law and administration and the work of CERN and the field of
particle physics. I also suggested some future directions or recommendations, such as how my
work can be expanded and extended to other topics or issues related to the gap between law
and administration, and how my work can be updated and revised to reflect the changing needs
and demands of the legal and administrative fields. I also followed some implications and
applications of my work, and some future directions or recommendations, such as
The third question that you need to prepare for the interview is “tell me about your
technical/administrative strengths”. Here is how you can answer this question:

Some of my technical/administrative strengths are:

• Legal research: I have the ability to conduct legal research using various sources and methods,
such as online databases, libraries, journals, books, reports, etc. I can identify, locate, and
evaluate relevant and reliable information and data on legal topics and issues, and synthesize
and organize them in a logical and coherent way.
• Legal writing: I have the ability to write legal documents and reports using proper format, style,
and language. I can communicate legal arguments and opinions clearly, concisely, and
persuasively, and support them with evidence and citations. I can also edit and proofread my
own and others’ legal writing to ensure accuracy, consistency, and quality.
• Legal analysis: I have the ability to analyze legal problems and situations using critical thinking
and reasoning skills. I can apply legal rules and principles to facts and evidence, and interpret
and evaluate legal sources and authorities. I can also compare and contrast different legal
perspectives and approaches, and identify and resolve legal conflicts and gaps.
• Negotiation skills: I have the ability to negotiate effectively and efficiently with different parties
and stakeholders. I can prepare and plan for negotiation scenarios, and establish and prioritize
my goals and interests. I can also communicate and listen actively and respectfully, and build
rapport and trust with others. I can also use various strategies and techniques to persuade and
influence others, and to reach mutually beneficial and satisfactory outcomes.
• Communication skills: I have the ability to communicate verbally and non-verbally with different
audiences and purposes. I can speak confidently and clearly, and use appropriate tone, volume,
and pace. I can also use body language and gestures to enhance my communication, and adapt
to different situations and contexts. I can also write effectively and professionally, and use
proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
• Legal ethics: I have the ability to act ethically and responsibly in legal matters and situations. I
can follow the legal codes and standards of conduct and professionalism, and respect the rights
and duties of myself and others. I can also recognize and avoid legal conflicts of interest and
malpractice, and report and correct any legal errors or misconduct.

The fourth question that you need to prepare for the interview is “tell me about your motivation as well
as what your ideal work environment looks like and what you hope to gain from this experience”. Here
is how you can answer this question:
My motivation for applying for the CERN Administrative Student Program is to explore how legal
frameworks and policies can support and regulate scientific innovation and collaboration, and how
scientific knowledge and evidence can inform and improve legal reasoning and decision-making. I am
fascinated by the intersection of law and science, and I want to fix the gap between law and
administration that I perceive in both fields. I think that CERN is the ideal place to pursue this
motivation, as it is a world-leading organization in the field of particle physics and a pioneer in
international cooperation. I am impressed by the cutting-edge research and experiments that CERN
conducts, such as the Large Hadron Collider, the discovery of the Higgs boson, and the antimatter
research. I am also inspired by the cooperation and coordination that CERN achieves among the
member states and the international partners, and the dissemination and communication that CERN
provides to the public and the stakeholders.

My ideal work environment is one that is multicultural and multidisciplinary, where I can work with
people from different backgrounds, cultures, and fields, and learn from their experiences and
perspectives. I also prefer a work environment that is dynamic and challenging, where I can work on
various projects and tasks, and face new problems and opportunities. I also appreciate a work
environment that is supportive and collaborative, where I can receive feedback and guidance from my
supervisor and colleagues, and also contribute to their work and goals.

I hope to gain from this experience some new skills and knowledge that I need for my goal of fixing the
gap between law and administration, such as the technical and scientific aspects of particle physics, the
legal and administrative systems and processes of CERN, and the cultural and linguistic diversity of the
organization. I also hope to gain from this experience some personal and professional development,
such as improving my communication and teamwork skills, expanding my network and connections, and
enhancing my confidence and competence.