Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/236829204
CITATIONS READS
78 9,152
1 author:
John Soluri
Carnegie Mellon University
70 PUBLICATIONS 577 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by John Soluri on 28 November 2016.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal
of Social History
This content downloaded from 128.2.10.23 on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 01:44:06 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEWS 183
Something New
Century Worl
plus 421 pp. $
This content downloaded from 128.2.10.23 on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 01:44:06 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
184 journal of social history fall 2002
For example, McNeill argues that "food demand drove
doubling of cropland, helped to fuel the Green Revol
world's fishing effort," (p. 275). However, in many par
region with which this reviewer is most familiar), the
during the twentieth century resulted from land spe
land colonization, and expanding export markets for
coffee, and cotton?projects that had little to do with f
Furthermore, the book's global lens does not have a f
tinguish between different kinds of croplands and pr
there is no way to distinguish the environmental impac
in Costa Rica from those associated with Brazilian mo
qualitatively distinct ways of producing coffee for glob
The book's broad scope also severely limits its ability
race, class, ethnicity, gender, and culture shaped the hi
profound environmental transformations. McNeill ack
in population, production, and energy use affected dif
classes and social groups quite unevenly, favoring some
he rarely links his engines of change to specific times,
there is a strong tendency to lump diverse social group
highly contested (and often bloody) struggles to contr
For example, McNeill writes, "we erected new politics,
institutions predicated on continuous growth. Should th
or even taper off, we will face another set of wrenchi
This is simply too sweeping a statement given the past
levels of warfare and social conflict on small and large
particularly those who resisted and/or were marginali
and/or market economies?the past century was no age
need not be an eco-feminist to note that this massive "
masculine project. In short, it is never entirely clear ju
"we" all agreed to play by the rules set down by the h
markets that were central to shaping resource use in th
A final concern centers on the book's time frame. M
change identified by McNeill were already revving up
and nineteenth centuries, and in many ways the twent
as a period when pre-existing processes accelerated. By
century's exceptionalism, McNeill risks losing sight o
nuities and the monumental ecological changes that o
(e.g., the sixteenth century "Columbian Exchange") th
term, transcontinental processes central to the emerge
economy. The twentieth century focus also places his
miliar location of the "West" and largely denies agenc
industrial centers.
These concerns aside, readers with a general interest i
will find SomethingNew Under the Sun to be very handy r
mation about large-scale trends and key events in recen
The book would also be a valuable addition to reading
environmental studies courses that seldom include wo
importantly, McNeill's approach reminds social and cu
This content downloaded from 128.2.10.23 on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 01:44:06 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEWS 185
This content downloaded from 128.2.10.23 on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 01:44:06 UTC
View publication stats
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms