Some people think that government should invest more money in

teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to

develop and progress
Some people hold a belief that governments should spend more money on
teaching science topics than other subjects. In my opinion, I will change this
school of thought.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that undeveloped and developing countries
need scientific inventions to enhance their development. One example of these
countries is Viet Nam, whose economy has grown significantly by applying
mechanization to its agriculture. This is because farmers can boost their
productivity and harvest a better crop, which helps them earn more money by
using mechanical engines. Moreover, in the age of science and technology,
people can quickly get a well-paid job both in their region and overseas if they
have been trained in good technological skills in their school. Undoubtedly,
with the economic growth and the increase in GDP, the residents will have a
thorough life, and the governments will have an opportunity to develop other
things.
On the other hand, unlike the nations above, which depend on the available
machines, developed nations depend mostly on innovations to expand their
development. This puts a force on schools to teach students other subjects to
stimulate students' creativity. One example of this type of education is
America's education, where pupils can choose the subjects attached to their
ability. As a result, this country achieved numerous scientific achievements and
innovations, which were devoted to improving other subjects.
In conclusion, the aforementioned analyses make me conclude that it is wiser
action for undeveloped countries and developing countries to allocate funds for
science education than developed countries.