Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER – I
INTRODUCTION
Welfare may be granted to people with social security and their well
beings. It is usually projected to make certain that people can meet their
fundamental human requirements such as food, cloth and shelter. Welfare
efforts to present a free or a financial support of certain commodities and
social services in some important fields like health, education and social
security. The welfare state government plays an important role in the
safeguard and promotion of the social and economic security and well-
being of its citizens. The welfare state is viewed as the welfare of the
poor. The concept of welfare state also focuses on social insurance, social
rights and social services. A welfare state also ensures economic
management and introduces economic welfare policies. (Garland, 2016,
pp.5-9)
2
Different view of Welfare State
Classical View of Welfare State
Classical Liberal theory based on the foundation of the theory of Laissez
Faire. The classical Liberalists introduced a negative view of the state by
asserting that state is a necessary evil. The principle of Classical
Liberalism or Individualism is with the aim that the activities of state
should be kept within the possible limits. This is the concept of a police
state. The classical view about welfare is largely limited to the production
of material wealth. A person‟s wealth is calculated by the worth of a
product produced by his own labor. The extra the labor will be, the more
the total output leading to improvement in welfare. Therefore welfare is a
constructive task of population growth.
The welfare State is responsible and accountable to its people for their
well-beings. It has to look after the social and economic development of
its citizens particularly including the weaker and vulnerable sections of
the society. The model of welfare state is different from the police state.
The police State described the role of the state as guardian from external
attack. It aimed to maintain peace and order in the state. It was not
accountable to the security and well-being of its people. The welfare of
human beings was not the responsibility of the state. State has nothing to
do with it. The weaker sections of society were generally exploited by
socially and economically strong and elite groups. The State has refrained
from inferring the relations and permitted stronger groups to exploit
weaker sections. This was the era laissez faire. In this era, the state
protected individual liberty. The social economic relations of society
were determined according to mutual capacities of groups. It created
social and economic inequality in society. It created groups of poor and
rich and also increased the gap between them.
3
Liberal View of Welfare State
From the liberal view of the welfare state, the state only gets in the way to
improve poverty and provide for basic needs. Such a type of nation
provides minimum benefits to the poor and vulnerable sections of society.
A welfare state offers most of the budget to social-insurance schemes
focused on the poor and middle classes. In the liberal welfare state,
individual performance in the market is considered to be the most
important foundation of welfare. Therefore liberal tax expenditures
subsidize employee remuneration and individual savings accounts in the
pension and health areas.
4
and libraries and a lot of other goods and services to facilitate its citizens.
The ancient Indian state had the seedlings of a welfare state that
germinated and blossomed in its present appearance through the
progression of historical development. The Preamble and the Directive
Principles of State Policy make it fully clear that the goal is to form a
welfare and socialist state. The Directive Principles of State Policy are
guidelines to the central as well as state governments of India, to be kept
in mind while making laws, policies and programmes for the
nation. The Directive Principles of State Policy are incorporated in part
IV of the constitution of India. These principles are the instruments of
instructions for the governments of the country. The directive principles
put down certain economic and social policies to be achieved by the
various governments in India. The welfare objective of the constitution
finds look in Article 38. This article comes under the directives principles
of the state policy. Article 38 of the constitution of India reads, "State to
secure a social order for the promotion of welfare of the people". It also
says:
3.
5
Following are the various social and economic rights incorporated under
Directive Principles in our constitution (Pandey, 2008, p.386):
Right of both sexes to equal pay for equal work: article 39 (d)
Right to work
6
services have also been brought under welfare as offering to the poor,
needy and vulnerable section of the society has attained vital importance.
The Punjab economy for the period of the 1980s was suffering from
extreme political and social turmoil. The function of democratic
government at the state level was absolutely disturbed. The state fully
sidetracked the government from engaging in developmental or welfare
activities to checking law and order problems in its place. The heavy
expenditure is spent on the security forces during this time. The normal
functioning of the state government was disrupted. The state
7
government‟s main duty to provide health and educational services has
become dysfunctional. Social sectors such as health and education which
are essential to human development, suffered rigorously due to the lack of
public resources. (Singh & Singh, 2016, pp.4-5)
9
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
After independence in 1947 A.D., India had to face a number of socio-
economic problems. The Government's policies and programmes have
put stress on poverty alleviation, employment generation and income
opportunities and provision of infrastructure and basic facilities or
services to meet the needs of rural deprived people. In order to this
implementation, many socio-economic welfare schemes were introduced
from time to time by Indian government as well as state governments for
the betterment of society.
Vidyarthi & Mishra‟s work “Harijan Today” (1977) explains the social,
economic, political and educational condition of the scheduled castes. He also
focused concentration on economic aspects such as landlessness, indebtedness,
low Income and poor standards of livelihood. He has discussed untouchability
and the hierarchical position of scheduled castes, their family life, marriage and
divorce, health and sanitation. He has discussed the role of a variety of voluntary
agencies and social reform movements to raise the position of Harijans.
Constitutional safeguards for their improvement have been stated. It has stated
that dalit woman and their problems deep-rooted in India‟s traditional social
order.
11
Gupta‟s book “Structural Dimensions of Poverty in India” (1987)
explains that welfare state means the state that takes care of the welfare of
its people. The state is not a body meant for collecting tax and protecting
life and property of people from internal and external threat. But also it
should take care of the fundamental needs of the people like health,
education, food and shelter, infrastructure facilities like public buildings,
roads, educational institutions and irrigation. The activities of present-day
welfare states broaden cash benefits to the needy sections for their
livelihood and for fulfilling their social, cultural, educational obligations.
13
dharma should command all his servants to work for the welfare of the
people in his territory.
Chakrapani & Kumar (ed.) in their book “Changing Status and Role of
Women in Indian Society” (1994) focused on women empowerment.
This book deals with women and development, health and education,
women‟s role in economic activity, women political participation,
women and victimization. It also examines the role of women in
changing society, rural women‟s status, status and decision making
among women in family, women in engineering education and the role of
higher education in the empowerment of women. This book describes
tribal women and development programmes and economic independence
for women. It highlights discrimination against women in rural India and
less political participation of women.
14
which socio-economic aspects of beneficiaries are discussed. That‟s why;
the present study tries to cover the research gap. This study examined the
implementation and impact of social welfare schemes in the district of
Sangrur of Punjab state since 2002 A.D.
Theoretical Framework
This research work is an effort to examine the social welfare schemes in
the district of Sangrur in Punjab state. The research topic is Social
Welfare Schemes in Punjab since 2002: A Study of Implementation and
its Impact in the District of Sangrur (Pb.). The objectives of the study are
to examine the social welfare schemes executed in the district Sangrur by
the government of Punjab since 2002, to study the socio-economic
conditions of the respondents, to inspect the paradoxes in the
implementation social welfare schemes in the concerned district and to
scrutinize the success and the effectiveness of social welfare schemes in
the Sangrur district of Punjab.
17
in the policies and programmes and implementation of welfare programmes.
18
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
The interest in the study of well-being, life satisfaction and happiness is fairly
new but the theories of happiness are age old. According to the philosophers of
ancient Greece, “happiness accompanies a life of intelligent reflection”
(Seligman, 2002). Similarly, according to a Roman philosopher, Cicero, “there
is no fool who is happy, and no wise man who is not” (Seligman, 2011).
Throughout history, philosophers and researchers have given contradicting and
conflicting ideas about happiness. Usually, happiness is categorized by people
as feeling good (Alipour, Pedram, Abedi & Rostami, 2012). However, such a
definition of happiness is too narrow a conceptualization (Clark, Frijters &
Shields, 2008). According to Di Tella and Mac Culloch (2006), happiness is
not limited to doing and feeling good, it is much deeper. Happiness comes
from identifying virtues, cultivating them and then living life according to
those virtues. The most important virtue according to this concept is gratitude
and a grateful individual may indulge in practices which will make his
43
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
arises from behaviour rather than achieving end-points or goals. This theory
explains that the individual should focus on the activities which would lead to
goal fulfilment rather than the goal to be achieved. The goal set should
match the person’s skill, as an easy activity would lead to boredom which
would in turn lead to anxiety (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). It is seen as a focal
point for an individual’s growth.
The genetic theory described that happiness as an inborn disposition to enjoy life and that it
was hereditary (Lykken, 1999). According to this theory, the vehemence to enjoy life
and be happy is genetic and is inherited by an individual. A fair majority of researchers
are conflicted about the nature of this disposition as there is a reward system of the
brain which links it to positive and negative affect and in turn makes a person happy or
sad (Diener, Kesebir & Tov, 2009). On the other hand, according to the personality
predisposition theory, an individual’s happiness depends upon the personality traits he
possesses (Keyes, Schmotkin & Ryff, 2002). This theory also validates that genetics
and heredity play a vital role in determining the happiness of an individual. The
dynamic equilibrium theory also states that personality affects the way an individual
evaluates life events, which in turn determines whether the individual will be happy or
not (Headey & Wearing, 1992).
A more prescriptive approach towards happiness was given by Ryff and Singer (1996) in
‘psychological well-being’ and Ryan and Deci (2000) in ‘self-determination theory’.
These theories gave a more rigid and objective approach towards happiness, and
advocated the fulfilment of certain needs (like autonomy, self- acceptance, personal
growth or environmental mastery) as a precondition for happiness. The researchers
working on subjective well-being rely more on people’s evaluation of their lives and
impart scientific credibility to it. On the other hand, according to Ryff and Singer’s
(1996) and Ryan and Deci’s (2000), conceptualisation of happiness, self- evaluations
and appraisals only feed frivolous optimism and raw hedonism. The constituents of
happiness (or subjective well-being), like positive affect and life satisfaction originate
from a person’s goals and values. Thus, people are more likely to experience high
levels of happiness when they have fulfilled their personal goals, this is in line with
Ryff and Singer’s (1996) and Ryan and Deci’s (2000) conceptualisation of happiness
(Diener & Larsen, 1993).
46
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
The present study has been undertaken with the following specific objectives in view.
Hypotheses:
47
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
Research design
48
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
Sampling design
The sample design of the present study comprises of the following elements:
a) Area of study
The study population from which the sample was drawn consists of 4 sectors
i.e. banking, education, health and manufacturing. From each sector, public
sector organisations were identified using stratified proportionate sampling
technique. Full time employees were selected from each sector.
c) Sampling frame
The sample for the study was drawn from the human resource departments of
the selected organisations. The websites of the respective institutions also
provided information pertaining to the number of employees present.
d) Sampling unit
49
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
𝑍2 × 𝑃(1 − 𝑃)/𝑒2
𝑆=
1 + (𝑧2 × 𝑝(1 − 𝑝)/𝑒2𝑁
The sample size came out to be 390. But since it has been recommended that a
higher sample size has higher chances of obtaining significant results (Cohen,
1996), it was proposed to take a sample of approximately 400 respondents and
accordingly the effective sample size of 400 respondents was selected.
Thereafter, the sample was distributed in 4 sectors- banking, education, health
and manufacturing.
f) Sampling Method
The sampling method used in the study was directly stratified proportionate
sampling using 10 per cent proportionality. The effective sample size of 400
was divided according to the 10 per cent proportionality criteria. The
respondents were selected accordingly from banking, education, health and
manufacturing. Effective sample size and its structure is presented in Table
3.1.
50
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
51
Demographic Characteristics of the Sample
As shown in the table 3.2, majority of the respondents under study were males
which approximately constitute 54.5% of the whole sample along with 45.5%
of the females. With regard to age, 3% of the respondents were up to 20 years
old whereas 55.8 % of the respondents were 21- 30 years old and 9% of the
sample consisted of people above the age group of 40 years. Majority of the
respondents i.e. 56.3% were married amongst which 34 % of the respondent’s
spouses were employed and 13.3% were unemployed. About 43% of the
respondents were unmarried, 0.5 % divorced and 0.5% widowed. The majority
of the respondents belonged to nuclear families (66%) while majority of the
respondents (64.8%) had no children, 16% of the respondents who had one
child, 15.3% had 2 children, 3% had 3 children and 1 % of the respondents had
4 or more than 4 children. Around 60 % of the respondents under study held a
Master’s degree, 20.3% held above a master’s degree and 18% held a
bachelor’s degree.
52
Introduction
Table4.1:FactorsofHappinessatWorkplace
Standard
S.No. Factors Mean
Deviation
53
their HAW.
DemographicsandHappinessatWorkplace:
InordertoexaminethecurrentstateofHAWandthedivergenceintheperception
oftheemployeesworkingindifferentsectors,inferentialstatisticaltestslike
ANOVAandt-testwereconductedonselecteddemographicfactors.Toevaluate the
difference between the means of two independent or unrelated groups, the
independentsamplet-testwasconducted.Itevaluatedwhetherthemeanvalueof
thetestvariable(i.e.,happinessatworkplace)fordemographicvariables(gender
andtype of family) differs significantly from the mean value of the test variable
for the second group (see for results Table 4.2).
54
Gender:
Of the 400 respondents in the survey, 218 were men and 182 were women. Given
that the p-value is greater than 0.05, it is clear from the independent sample t-test
that there is no significant difference between genders' levels of workplace
pleasure.The respondents expressed general satisfaction at
Numerous research studies (Alesina et al., 2006; Barra, 2010; Csikszentmihalyi &
Hunter, 2003; Inglehart, Foa, Peterson & Welzel, 2008; Swami, Voracek, Dressler,
Eisma & Furnham, 2009) have reported that gender is a crucial variable when it
comes to happiness and wellbeing. Nevertheless, research by Yasuko, Romano,
Garcia, and Felix (2005), as well as Lyubomirsky and Lepper (1999), refuted this
theory and discovered that gender has no bearing on happiness.
Family Type:
264 of the 400 respondents in the current study had nuclear families, whereas 136
had joint families. The independent sample t-test indicates that, when considering
the type of family, there is a significant difference in workplace happiness, with a p-
value of less than 0.05.The respondents assessed their overall level of satisfaction at
work as moderately excellent; nevertheless, the degree of contentment among those
who live in joint families is marginally greater (M =3.4295, SD =.42952) than that of
respondents who live in nuclear families. The results are consistent with those of Rim
(1993), who discovered that higher levels of happiness were displayed by men and
women who had larger families and siblings.They were more ambitious and shown
greater levels of maturity, self-direction, and restrictive compliance.A larger family
gives a person more time and energy to engage in activities that promote his personal
development and well-being, which in turn raises his level of enjoyment and
enhances his performance at work.
Income:
55
Table4.3:HappinessatWorkplaceandIncome
Dimensions of Happiness
Income(inRs) N Mean F Sig.
at Workplace
Lessthan10,000 43 3.3895
10,000-30,000 138 3.2518
Supportive Organisation 30,000-50,000 107 3.4720 1.443 .219
Experiences
50,000-100,000 74 3.3784
100,000&above 38 3.5789
Lessthan10,000 43 3.2586
10,000-30,000 138 2.8468
Unsupportive 30,000-50,000 107 2.8070
4.666 .001*
Organisation Experiences 50,000-100,000 74 2.7829
100,000&above 38 3.1932
Lessthan10,000 43 3.6395
10,000-30,000 138 3.8170
Flow&Intrinsic 30,000-50,000 107 3.9720
2.501 .042*
Motivation 50,000-100,000 74 3.9797
100,000&above 38 4.0921
Lessthan10,000 43 3.1919
10,000-30,000 138 3.3569
30,000-50,000 107 3.2103
WorkRepulsiveFeelings 2.251 .063
50,000-100,000 74 3.0203
100,000&above 38 3.0965
Lessthan10,000 43 3.2510
10,000-30,000 138 3.4047
Overall Happiness at 30,000-50,000 107 3.4782
2.454 .045*
Workplace 50,000-100,000 74 3.3063
100,000&above 38 3.3936
*Significantat5percentlevel
56
According to the results presented in Table 4.3, wealth has a substantial impact on flow and
intrinsic motivation (p<0.05), unsupportive organizational experiences (p<0.05), and overall
workplace happiness (p<0.05). The respondents with incomes less than Rs 10,000 had the highest
meanscores (M= 3.2586) when comparing their experiences with unsupportive organizations.The
progressive decline in meanscores with rising income suggests that incidences of unsupportive
organizational experiences decline as employees' income rises.This demonstrates the significance
of money as a motivator. However, the mean score for unsupportive organisation experiences
increases beyond a certain income, i.e., Rs 100,000 & above (M=3.1932). This suggests that,
although having a sufficient income is necessary to ensure happiness at work, employees expect
more in order to promote long-lasting happiness. When compared to lower income groups, the flow
and intrinsic motivation are highest among respondents with an income of Rs 100,000 & above
(M=4.0921).The employees who are paid appropriately are willing to put in more effort and time to
perform the duties allocated to them, as seen by the progressive increase in mean scores that
corresponds with the respondents' income.
The mean ratings for respondents' overall job satisfaction indicate a progressive increase from those
making less than Rs 10,000 (M=3.2510) to those in the Rs 30,000–50,000 (M=3.4782) salary
range, after which the mean score declines. Short-term, self-serving behaviors are encouraged by
money. To guarantee enduring contentment and drive among employees, it is imperative to offer
benefits beyond monetary compensation, such as favorable working environments, fulfilling roles,
independence, and acknowledgement.
Numerous researches have confirmed the relationship between socioeconomic welfare and
happiness, finding that higher income levels are linked to higher levels of happiness (Cornelis,
2010). An enough wage is essential for an employee to be happy and have a great quality of work
life, claim Saraji and Dargahi (2006). According to Blanchflower & Oswald (2006), a person's
happiness is positively impacted by their money—but only up to a certain point, after which the
relationship between income and happiness becomes less pronounced. Other
Research (Diener, Ng, Harter & Arora, 2010; Di Tella, McColloch & Oswald, 2003; Easterlin,
2006; Stutzer, 2004) has also supported similar conclusions. Regarding the connection between
income and job satisfaction, some researchers continue to disagree. The findings of Easterlin
(2010) and Graham (2010)'s research indicate that there is insufficient evidence to firmly establish
a causal relationship between employee income and workplace satisfaction, and it is impossible to
say for sure whether higher money translates into happier employees.
Years of Experience:
57
The information in Table 4.4 shows that experience affects every aspect of workplace happiness,
including flow and intrinsic motivation (p<0.05), work repulsive feelings (p<0.05), supportive and
unsupportive organization experiences (p<0.05), and overall workplace happiness (p<0.05). This
indicates that experience has a significant impact on happiness levels across all respondent
groups.When comparing respondents with up to three years of experience to those with more over
fifteen years of experience, there is a discernible increase in the mean of the measures and total job
satisfaction. The initial years of job experience are marked by a low mean score for supportive
organizational experiences (M=3.1855), flow and intrinsic motivation (M=3.7868), and overall
workplace happiness (M=3.2907). These scores increase with experience and reach their maximum
for employees with over 15 years of job experience. This shows that in their early careers,
individuals are often less experienced than their more seasoned colleagues since they are less
familiar with the organization's policies, have higher expectations, and are generally less satisfied.
Employees' chances of advancement and progress rise as they gain experience and become more
accustomed to the job; this positively affects their pleasure there, as seen by rising
meanscores.During the first few years of employment, the worker's responsibilities are restricted,
and their social network is also small. Employees feel more unattractive at work and the
unsupportive organizational climate grows as this circle widens.
58
Table4.4:HappinessatWorkplace&YearsofExperience
Dimensionsof
Happiness at Experience N Mean F Sig.
Workplace
Upto3years 170 3.1855
3-7years 105 3.3265
Supportive
7-11years 62 3.4381
Organisation 2.425 .048*
Experiences 11-15years 24 3.4583
Above15
39 3.7179
years
Upto3years 170 2.7436
3-7years 105 2.9937
Unsupportive 7-11years 62 3.0765
Organisation 4.330 .002*
11-15years 24 3.1129
Experiences
Above15
39 3.7083
years
Upto3years 170 3.7868
3-7years 105 3.7984
Flow&Intrinsic 7-11years 62 3.9714 3.174 0.01*
Motivation 11-15years 24 4.0625
Above15
39 4.2179
years
Upto3years 170 2.9765
3-7years 105 3.0659
WorkRepulsive 7-11years 62 3.2310
2.415 .048*
Feelings 11-15years 24 3.2632
Above15
39 3.5417
years
Upto3years 170 3.2907
3-7years 105 3.3632
Overall Happiness 7-11years 62 3.4085
3.348 .010*
at Workplace 11-15years 24 3.4140
Above15
39 3.6927
years
*Significantat5percentlevel.
TheresultsofsimilarstudiesonthesubjectconductedbyGupta(2012),
ElamparuthiandJambulingam(2015);KarrierandKhurana(1996),however
suggest that with the increase in work experience, the quality of work-life and
happiness of employees starts decreasing. The findings are in contradiction
with the
findingsofNanjundeswaeaswamyandSwamy(2013),accordingtowhichtheyears
59
ofexperiencedonothaveasignificantimpactonthehappiness,wellbeingand quality of
work life of an individual.
MaritalStatus:
Table4.5:HappinessatWorkplaceandMaritalStatus
Widowed 2 1.8333
Widowed 2 4.7500
Widowed 2 3.4083
60
not have any significant effect on any dimension of workplace happiness as the p-
value in all the cases is reported to be greater than 0.05. According to the Social
IntegrationTheoryofHappiness,marriagedoesn’tincreasehappinessanymore than
cohabitation. The social set- up is evolving and now there is less pressure on
people to get married. According to Ross, Catherine, John and Karen
(1990),happiness and marriage are not mutually exclusive and can operate
simultaneously which implies that people who are already happy are more likely
to be selected for marriage.
The respondents' mean ratings, however, indicate that married employees (M=3.4589) are generally happier than
single, divorced, and widowed employees. In 1998, Stack and Eshleman conducted a study which found that married
individuals were 3.4 times happier than single ones. The study also found that marriage had a positive impact on both
men's and women's health and financial status. Research by Bradburn (1969), Coombs (1991), Glenn (1975),
Goldman and Hu (1993), Gove, Style and Hughes (1990), Hahn (1993), Stack and Wasserman (1995) and others
bolster the claim that marriage has a substantial impact on happiness and is linked to better health, a decline in suicide
rates, and a reduction in mortality.
61
References
Aiyar, S.P., (ed.) (1966) Perspectives on the Welfare State, Bombay.
Altekar, A.S., (1955) The Planned State in Ancient India, Vol. 18,
Indian History Congress, pp. 33-40.
Chadha, V., & Chadda, I., (2017) Social Sector Development in Punjab,
Pacific Business Review International, Volume 10 Issue 2.
Garland, D., (2016) The Welfare State, Oxford University Press, 198
Madison Avenue, New York, USA.
Thakur, A.K., & Kumar, D., (ed.) (2008) Gender Empowerment and
Development, Deep & Deep publications Pvt. Ltd. F-159, Rajouri
Garden, New Delhi- 110027.
63