DISSERTATION

ON

“SUSTAINABLE FINANCE AND ESG INVESTING”

SUBMITTED TO UTTARANCHAL UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF

THE REQUIREMENTS

FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF

MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

SUBMITTED BY:

SARASWATI BHATT

(ENROLLMENT NO. UU2219000118)

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF

DR. GURLEEN KAUR ANAND

(ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR)

(BATCH: 2022-2024)

UTTARANCHAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT

UTTARANCHAL UNIVERSITY, DEHRADUN

1
 CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION

I, SARASWATI BHATT hereby declare that the Dissertation, entitled “ SUSTAINABLE

FINANCE AND ESG INVESTING” Submitted to the Uttaranchal University, Dehradun in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Master of
Administration is a record of original research work undergone by the supervision and
guidance of DR. GURLEEN KAUR ANAND (ASSISTANT PROFESSOR), Uttaranchal
Institute of Management, Uttaranchal University, and it has not formed the basis for the
award of any Degree/Fellowship or other similar title to any candidate of any
University/Institute.

Date: Signature of the Student

This is to certify that the statement made by the candidate is true to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

Date: Signature of Guide

2
 CERTIFICATE

I have the pleasure of certifying that SARASWATI BHATT is a Bonafede student in the 4th
semester of the Master’s Degree in Business Administration (Batch 2022-24), of Uttaranchal
University, Dehradun. She has completed her project work entitled “SUSTAINABLE
FINANCE AND ESG INVESTING” under my guidance. I certify that this is her original
effort & has not been copied from any other source. This project has also not been submitted
to any other Institute / University for award of any Degree. This project fulfils the
requirement of the curriculum prescribed by this University for the said course. I recommend
this project work for evaluation & consideration for the award of a degree to the student.

Signature:

Guide Name: DR. GURLEEN KAUR ANAND

Designation: (Assistant Professor)

Date:

I wish her all the best.

3
 PREFACE

Every study is incomplete without having a well concrete exposure of the research.
Management studies are not exception that scopes, of the project at this level are very wide
ranging. Student of management are successfully processed and refined through the mean of
final report so that they may have a complete exposure to present scenario. This final report
has been taken as a part of M.B.A. degree Course. This purpose of the study is to use and
apply our academic knowledge gained during the curriculum in getting valuable insights of
corporate culture with all its attendants completes. I have done a lot of hard work despite of
all my sincere efforts. This is possibility that there may be some areas which may remain
uncovered in study. I once again think to all those who help one directly or indirectly in
preparing my project.

SARASWATI BHATT

4
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to all those who contributed to
the completion of this report. Their support and assistance have been invaluable in bringing
this project to fruition. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor/advisor DR.
GURLEEN KAUR ANAND (Assistant Professor), Uttaranchal Institute of Management
for their guidance, expertise, and valuable insights throughout the entire process. Their
knowledge and feedback have greatly enriched this report. I would like to acknowledge the
contribution of the resources and references that have been cited in this report. The works of
various authors, researchers, and organizations have served as valuable sources of
information, enabling a comprehensive and well-rounded analysis. Finally, I am grateful to
my friends and family for their unwavering support and encouragement throughout the entire
process. Their belief in my abilities has been a constant source of motivation. While every
effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented in
this report, any errors or omissions are entirely my own. Thank you to everyone involved for
their invaluable contributions in making this report possible.

5
 TABLE OF CONTENT
.

TITLE PAGE NO.

CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY -----

PREFACE i

ACKNOWLEGEMENT ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS iii

LIST OF FIGURES iv

LIST OF TABLES v

CHAPTER -1: INTRODUCTION 1-11

CHAPTER-2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE 12-15

CHAPTER-3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 16-18

CHAPTER-4: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 18-44

CHAPTER-5: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION 45-48

REFRENCES 51-52

ANNEXURE:
53-56
QUESTIONNAIRE

6
 LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF FIGURES PAGE NO.

FIGURE 1.1 35
FIGURE 1.2 36
FIGURE 1.3 37
FIGURE 2.1 38
FIGURE 2.2 39
FIGURE 2.3 40
FIGURE 2.4 41
FIGURE 2.5 42
FIGURE 2.6 42
FIGURE 2.7 44
FIGURE 2.9 46

7
LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF TABLES PAGE NO.

TABLE 3.1 36

TABLE 3.2 37

TABLE 3.3 39

TABLE 3.4 40

TABLE 3.5 42

TABLE 3.6 43

TABLE 3.7 44

TABLE 3.8 46

TABLE 3.9 47

TABLE 3.10 49

8
CHAPTER-1

INTRODUCTION

9
INTRODUCTION

The concept of sustainable finance and ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance)
investing has gained significant attention in recent years. Investors are now looking beyond
financial returns and evaluating the environmental and social performance of the firms before
making any investment decisions, as they are becoming more aware about the effects that
enterprises have on the environment and society. The financial industry is moving more
towards ethical and sustainable investment methods as a result of these concerns. In order to
promote sustainable development and provide long-term financial returns, ESG investing
focuses on integrating environmental, social, and governance concerns into investment
decisions.

Sustainable Finance: Sustainable finance refers to a collection of financial techniques and

approaches that gives priority to investment that have favorable effects on the economy,

society and environment. It encompasses variety of financial products like green bonds,

impact investments and funds with an emphasis on environmental, social and governance

issues. Sustainable finance objective is to direct funds toward businesses and initiatives

which not only produce profits but also work towards more sustainable and fair future.

Sustainable finance signifies a departure from conventional financial practices, investing

techniques that take governance, social, and environmental factors into account. It marks a

conscientious effort to align financial decision-making with a commitment to long-term

sustainability. Environmental factors such as climate change, social considerations like

human rights, and governance issues including corporate ethics are integral components

shaping this new frontier in finance.

This approach has given rise to the new innovative financial products including green bonds,

sustainability-linked loans, and ESG-linked bonds have been made possible by this strategy.

The increasing number of government and regulatory agencies are recognizing the value of

sustainable finance and are enacting the laws to direct, guide and incentivize responsible

10
financial practices. (Ran Xiao, 2023). Sustainable finance and ESG investing have become

crucial strategies for companies and investors alike in the modern world, when worries about

social inequality, climate change, and corporate accountability are at the forefront. The term

"sustainable finance" refers to financial practices that incorporate governance, social, and

environmental factors into investment choices. It takes into account how investments will

affect society and the environment in the long run, going beyond conventional financial

measures.

ESG Investing: On the other side, ESG investing focuses particularly on assessing
businesses according to their social impact, environmental policies, and governance
frameworks. ESG investing and sustainable finance have a complex underlying logic. In the
first place, it synchronises investments with more general societal objectives, such reducing
climate change, advancing social equity, and encouraging sound governance. Second, it
satisfies the increasing desire from investors for possibilities to make ethical and responsible
investments. Research has indicated that organisations exhibiting robust environmental,
social, and governance (ESG) practices tend to surpass their contemporaries over an extended
period, suggesting the possibility of both economic gains and beneficial social influence.
Stakeholders, businesses, regulators, and investors must work together to adopt sustainable
finance and ESG investing practices. It includes incorporating ESG factors into investment
plans, interacting with businesses to enhance their ESG performance, and supporting laws
that encourage sustainability and ethical business practices. Although the field of sustainable
finance and ESG investing is still developing, it is crucial for bringing about positive change.
Investors can make financial gains and contribute to a more sustainable and just world by
taking governance, social, and environmental aspects into account when making investments.

Many factors have contributed to the acceptance of ESG investing and sustainable finance.

increased consciousness of social and environmental issues, along with worries about

business ethics and climate change, have prompted businesses and investors to think about

the bigger picture effects of their financial operations. ESG Investing has become a pivotal

11
element in reshaping investment evaluations, extending beyond conventional metrics to

encompass Environmental, Social and Governance factors. These metrics offers a

comprehensive assessment of a firm’s impact, scrutinizing its ecological footprint,

stakeholder relationships, internal structures, and leadership. Diverse investment strategies

underpin ESG Investing, including negative/positive screening and thematic approaches. The

foundational belief is that companies with robust ESG practices yield sustainable and long -

term financial performance.

FINANCIAL PRODUCTS

As the popularity of ESG investing grows every day, a growing number of businesses,

associations, and even governments employ or support the distribution of financial products

that support ESG. Known as "green assets," these products consist of the following:

FINANCIAL PRODUCTS

i. Green Bonds: There has been a significant increase in green bonds during the last few

years. Green, social, sustainability, SLB, and transition bonds have all

climbed by 59% since 2020, according to the Climate BondsInitiative, and they seem to be

going up by as much as 25% through 2022. The new type of investment, green bonds

accustomed to finance climate change and environmental projects. In other words, these

bonds function similarly to standard bonds, but the issuers make sure that the proceeds go

towards environmentally friendly projects. Companies, associations (like the Japan Finance

Organization for Municipalities), banks (like the Euro-Pean Investment Bank), and

governments all issue green bonds.

ii. Social Bonds: These bonds' earnings will only be used to fund social projects, like

improved access to clean drinking water, affordable housing, and healthcare and education.

12
The Social BondPrinciples are a voluntary set of rules that support the same values as the

GBP that were announced by the ICMA.

iii. Sustainability linked Bonds (SLBs): It is a fiscal instrument linked to each issuer's

potential future performance. The SLB is not required to fund any particular projects, in

contrast to how earnings from green bonds are linked to a particular green project. Its profits

can be applied to more expansive sustainable development initiatives. They can, for example,

keep an eye on particular metrics that are included in a business plan, like lowering carbon

dioxide emissions. Additionally, the issuers are expressly required to enhance their

sustainability performance within a set period of time (example, papers pertaining to the

issuance of bonds).

iv. ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds): Similar to other funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs)

pool client funds in a portfolio of various investment, including Stocks, Bonds, and Other

Securities. ETFs often offer investors diversity that helps manage risk by distributing the

fund's assets among a number of securities. Additionally, there are several kinds of ETFs,

including equities, commodities, index, and others. ETFs with an ESG focus are managed by

Vaneck, BlackRock, and other international investment management companies.

Additionally, BlackRock has launched ESG-screened ETFs60, which seek to reduce the

company's exposure owing to its contentious operations, risky business practices, or

misalignment with investor preferences. Leventi, L. (2022)

Challenges and Opportunities: Even while sustainable finance and ESG investing are

becoming more and more popular, problems still exist. Obstacles include the lack of readily

available data, the risk of greenwashing, and the standardization of measures. Still, there's a

13
lot of room for improvement. These strategies not only guarantee financial gains but also

provide a way forward for a more just, sustainable, and accountable global economy.

Transparency, responsibility, and a common goal of improving the future are critical as we

negotiate this changing environment. More than just fads, sustainable finance and ESG

investing signify a profound shift in our considering of the role of money in creating a world

that strikes a balance between profit and societal and environmental well-being.

Sustainable finance and ESG remain high on the regulatory agendas of the EU and the UK.

While the EU is still moving on with its Sustainable Finance ActionPlan and efforts under the

European Green Deal, the UK has been able to clarify its future course of action with the

release of a new Green Finance Strategy. These all have an effect on the financial industry

and the expectations of businesses about regulations.

Concerns about greenwashing are of utmost importance and are propelling changes in

corporate due diligence, product labels, reporting, taxonomies, and ESG data and ratings.

Additional criteria for transition plans are emerging as new reporting standards at the global

(ISSB) and EU (ESRS) levels approach completion.

Even in cases where they do not sell or provide specialized advice on environmentally
friendly products, investment managers and financial advisors are obligated to take
sustainability risks into account as part of their investment and advice procedures.

For banks and insurers, measuring and managing climate-related risk is now part of their
routine business oversight. Although there has been progress, more has to be done.

The pressure on businesses to prioritize sustainability and ESG is increasing; KPMG's EMA
FS Regulatory Insight Centre provides insights and thought leadership on the actions that
businesses and regulators are taking to integrate the ESG in the financial system.

Environmental sustainability stands as a cornerstone of sustainable finance, acknowledging

the recognizing the critical need to solve major environmental issues such pollution,
14
resource depletion, and climate change. With scientific evidence pointing to the existential
threat posed by global warming, investors are increasingly scrutinizing the environmental
practices of companies in their portfolios. From carbon emissions and energy efficiency to
waste management and biodiversity conservation, environmental considerations are
becoming integral to investment decision-making. The proliferation of green bonds, which
finance environmentally sustainable projects, and the growing demand for renewable energy
investments underscore the growing momentum towards a low-carbon economy.

Similarly, social responsibility has emerged as a critical dimension of sustainable finance,

recognizing the importance of promoting rights of human, laborstandards, and development
of the society. Investors are increasingly scrutinizing corporate conduct in areas like labor
standards, supply chain management, and diversity and inclusion. It is not new to see
innovative financial structures and techniques being developed to solve environmental and
social issues. In the past, this type of financing has mostly supported the "social economy" or
"social and solidarity economy" through concessionary financing, such as grants and
cooperative financing. The supply of nonmarket goods and services outside of the
government and mainstream markets has long been facilitated by the social economy in many
nations. As an illustration, the cooperative and mutual sector, which employs over 1.2billion
individuals worldwide in more than 3million businesses, is a significant component of many
economies. With 41 locations throughout Asia, the top 300 cooperatives in 2019 had a
combined turnover of almost $2 trillion. The main industries in which mutual organizations
and cooperative’s function are consumer groups, microfinance, agriculture, and work
integration. While a few mutual organizations and cooperatives function on a large scale, the
majority are little. For instance, the biggest dairy producer in India is Amul Dairy.
Furthermore, the EuropeanUnion’s (EU) larger economy constitutes a portion of the
EU'sGDP, accounting for 8% of GDP and creating 13.6 million jobs. Additionally, the EU's
wider social economy includes innovations aimed at resolving persistent environmental,
social, and community problems. The social economy, which links actors from the public,
private, and nonprofit sectors, presents an alternative economic model for the post-COVID-
19 era and could yield significant insights looking into ways to lower the risk of external
forces to the economy as a whole and to generally strengthen the resilience and
diversification of business ecosystems.

15
Investor Preferences

The growth of sustainable finance has been largely fueled by shifting investor preferences,
particularly those of millennials who stand to gain. It is estimated to be worth $68 trillion;
this will be the largest transfer of inherited wealth in human history during the next 20 years.
Of these, 45% said they wanted to invest for the benefit of others and that social
responsibility played a significant role in their financial choices. Not only that, but 90% of
female investors concur that having a positive social impact is crucial. Institutional investors
are also making explicit changes to their long-term investment risk models to account for
social and environmental governance when building investment portfolios. Insurance firms
and pension funds are two examples of these investors.

STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE FINANCE INVESTMENT

Investment methods for sustainable finance can be classified as positive/integrated or

negative/exclusionary.

Negative Sustainable Finance

A number of non-financial performance criteria from other ESG categories are usually used
to screen this category for risk, which helps calibrate the profile of long-term risks of
enterprises with highcarbon intensity, for example. ESG high-risk investments are
strategically avoided or divested as a result of such screening. While failures with highcarbon
intensity are typical risk screen, other hazards as well, including as

 Structure with the organization (internal), policies, and practices, like open
governance, efficient internal responsibility, positive employee relations, fair pay, and
secure working environments; specific initiatives to broaden the workforce's
inclusivity and diversity; focused investments in Human resources and nearby society;
and recycle programs to utilize resources.
 Effects and outcomes of external organizations, like pollution reduction, the
enforcement of human rights, and strategies for addressing inequality. Passive
screening has given way to a more aggressive use right to vote to confront corporate
behavior.

Positive Sustainable Finance

16
By focusing on the ventures with promising trajectories or impactful enterprises poised for
exponential growth, thereby by providing both new and additional cash, this category usually
seeks to achieve a "Double Delta" of impact. Its endeavours often align with the advancement
of one or more of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set forth by the United
Nations, as illustrated in Figure 1. This approach is occasionally labelled as socially
responsible investment, emphasizing its conscientious nature. Notably, investments have
predominantly targeted SDGs 8 (pertaining to decent work and economic growth), 12
(cantered on responsible consumption and production), and 13 (focused on climate action).
Conversely, SDGs 1 (addressing poverty alleviation), 2 (targeting hunger eradication), and 10
(aiming to mitigate inequalities) have garnered comparatively less attention. The imperative
to expand this sector stems from its pivotal role in realizing the SDG objectives by 2030,
particularly in light of the projected annual financing deficit estimated at $3-4 trillion. The
primary objective of positive and sustainable finance methodologies revolves around
channelling investments into ventures poised to yield significant societal and environmental
benefits, bolstered by fresh capital infusion. Investing in high impact enterprises with fresh
cash is the main goal of positive and sustainable financing methods.

17
Figure1.1: United Nations Sustainable Development Goal

It's no mere coincidence that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined in the
United Nations 2030 Agenda prioritize financial inclusion. Finance significantly impacts all
SDGs, particularly four key areas:
1.ACCESS: Championing financial inclusion for small and medium-sized enterprises (SDGs
Source:UnitedNations.https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
5, 8), governments (SDG 13), and individuals (affecting SDGs 1, 2, 3, 4, 10) is paramount.
Secure access to credit, insurance, savings, remittances, and payment systems facilitates safe
transactions, including cross-border trade, fostering smoother cash flows, sustained
consumption, and optimal capital allocation.

2.INVESTMENT: Fostering, guaranteeing, and providing funding for projects related to

renewable energy (SDGs 7, 13) and infrastructure (SDGs 6, 9) is vital. This involves diverse
entities such as international financial institutions, sovereign wealth funds, and asset
managers, ensuring both private and public investments flourish across various sectors.

3.RISK: Pioneering innovative pricing strategies to promote eco-friendly production and

lifestyles (SDG 12) is essential. Additionally, exchanging non-proprietary risk data and
enhancing risk governance (SDG 11) empowers nations to shape consumer behavior
positively and cultivate resilient societies. Collaboration among insurance firms to develop
open-source risk models facilitates informed decision-making regarding regulations and
18
infrastructure investments, mitigating disaster risks.

4.TRANSVERSAL EFFECTS: Augmenting environmental, social, and governance (ESG)

practices among customers and investee companies (SDGs 13, 14, 15, 16) is pivotal. This
entails adopting best practices, incorporating ESG considerations into pricing strategies, and
implementing active investing guidelines to ensure sustainable business operations and
investment decisions.

SUSTAINABLE FINANCE CATEGORIES

Environmental (Green)Finance

When discussing ESG topics, the term "green finance" is more commonly used than
"environmental finance." Green finance either removes its assets from companies that worsen
the climate catastrophe (negative/exclusionary) or invests in or grows cutting edge firms that
address climate-related issues (positive/integrated). Negative and exclusive green finance
typically focuses on shifting capital to businesses attempting to reduce their overall carbon
footprint or shifting financial contributions from companies with high carbon emissions to
lowcarbon businesses (as an investment). Concern has been raised about the long-term risk of
funding in petrochemical enterprises since it is thought to be a reflection of the balance sheet
which is mis priced value of assets that are sometimes referred to as "stranded. “These are
long-term efforts to extract oil and gas deposits that are now present but cannot be used
without blowing up the entire climate system. Carbon Tracker estimates that by 2050, this
will lead to an oil price that is below the production price rendering it unprofitable and
severely undervaluing current petrochemical stocks.
Positive–integration is used in order to combat the climate catastrophe, green finance
generally makes investments in firms that offer green technologies, such as carbon capture or
solar power. Green investments also prioritize businesses engaged in clean transportation,
pollution avoidance and management, the economy, biodiversity preservation, energy
efficiency, ecologically friendly resource management, and renewable energy. Green bonds,
in particular, are the dominant debt product in the thriving green finance industry. In general,
green bonds is classified into six:
19
(i) Corporate Bonds are issued by corporations to finance the acquisition of assets.
(ii) Project bonds, which are backed by one or more projects and expose the investor directly
to project risk.
(iii) Asset-backed securities, which are backed by one or more specific projects and often
only provide recourse to the assets
(iv) Agency, supranational, sovereign, or sub-sovereign bonds issued by global financial
organizations like the European Investment Bank (EIB) or the World Bank.
(v) Municipal bonds, which also include sovereign bonds, issued by a city, region, or
municipal government.
(vi) Bonds issued by financial institutions in the finance industry increase the capital of
financing on balance sheets by funding green initiatives.

A few carbon-intensive or highly polluting businesses have issued green "transition" bonds to
raise money for decarbonization projects. For instance, in order to finance efforts to minimize
pipeline leaks, the British company Cadent Gas issued a €500 million green bond in 2020.
Enel, an Italian power company, released a green bond index in 2019 that is correlated with
raising the proportion of renewable energy sources in its generation capacity. Divestment
from carbon-intensive enterprises is a trend that is associated with this type of green
financing
In order to assist carbon capture, water management models, meat substitutes, high-growth
green energy startups, or other initiatives, green bonds offer new sources of financial finance.
The "ocean economy," problems with marine sustainability and biodiversity, and blue bonds
have all gained popularity in recent years. A 23% increase from the previous year was seen in
the overall amount of "sustainable" debt issued in 2020, which includes green bonds was
$732 billion (see in Figure 1.2)

20
Figure1.2: Sustainable Debt Issuance2013-2020

Source:Sustainalytics(2021)

21
Social Finance
Social finance provides startup or growth capital to innovative enterprises addressing social
market failures in welfare provision, such as health, education, and employment. It also
divests from companies perpetuating negative social welfare outcomes. Consequently, funds
used for social purposes inherently serve as beneficial social assets. Impact investing, a
cornerstone of positive social finance, has evolved over the past two decades, aiming for both
financial returns and measurable social and environmental impacts. As a result, funds utilized
for socially beneficial purposes are inherently good social funds. In this setting, impact
investing has become a new paradigm of positive social finance over the last 20 years. The
global impact of Investing Impact investment was described by Network (GIIN),40 a non-
profit organization devoted to assembling and conducting research to develop the field's
infrastructure. Impact investments are those made with the intention of generating both a
profit and a positive, measurable social and impact on the environment.
The Global Steering Group for Impact Investment (GSGII), comprising 33 national advisory
bodies, advocates for expanding global impact investing. They emphasize maximizing risk,
return, and effect to benefit people and the environment, establishing clear financial, social,
and environmental goals.
To help people and the environment, impact investments maximize risk, return, and effect. It
accomplishes this by establishing distinct financial, social, and environmental goals and
tracking progress towards them. It is further confirmed as positive social finance that uses
money to actively solve social concerns by the emphasis on measurement in both definitions
as a component of the impact investment model.
Social bonds have emerged as a more recent concept in social finance. Social bonds are any
kind of bond in which the revenues are limited to financing (or refinancing) initiatives
pertaining to affordable housing, work integration, food security, health and education
sectors, water infrastructure, and access to services. The primary goal of social bonding is to
directly solve or ameliorate a particular social or environmental issue, frequently affecting a
specific target community. The use of finance, project evaluation procedures, finance
management, and reporting impact are the four main components of the Social Bond
Principles42 that the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) published in 2020 and
intended to be matched to the bond's declared social or environmental purpose.
22
Governance (Stakeholder)Finance

Governance finance stands out for its emphasis on stakeholder investment, targeting
companies complying with international labor standards, like those outlined by the
International Labor Organization. It also supports enterprises actively integrating purpose-
driven elements, such as employee representation on the management board, fostering
inclusivity and positivity. Conversely, it divests from firms failing to meet these criteria,
signaling a negative stance. It's noteworthy that governance finance is sometimes confused
with social or environmental finance due to its similar objectives and methodologies.

Finance and governance are related to how investments affect a variety of important
stakeholders inside the company. It shares many similarities, both positive and bad, with the
impact aims of social and green financing in this regard. These also have connections to
stakeholder financial concerns that have been framed within a broader context of discussions
on company "purpose." However, organizational ownership and legal incorporation forms are
the most unique aspects of positive stakeholder finance.

Cooperative and mutual finance are important drivers of stakeholder impact in terms of
stakeholder ownership. This is the outcome of investments made on an equitable
organizational framework intended to handle market failures or patterns of monopsony. In a
number of high-impact industries, including as housing, banking, insurance, agriculture,
healthcare, and work integration, cooperatives and mutual organizations are essential.
Numerous of these industries are significant. For instance, with assets valued at $8.9 trillion,
mutual and cooperative insurers held a 26.7% global market share in 2017 in over 90
countries. This market serves 960 million people as members and employs over a million
individual policy participants. In a similar vein, the assets of the global cooperative banking
industry were €7.4 billion in 2018.

Regarding stakeholder forms of incorporation, there are a number of legal forms available
worldwide for social purpose organizations that are intended to draw in financing with a
focus on stakeholders. Benefit businesses (in the US), community interest firms (in the UK),
and social cooperatives in Europe are a few examples of these. Different disclosure and
financial criteria apply to each of these legal forms of incorporation, all of which are
consistent with being a valid organization with a social purpose. Community interest
businesses, for instance, are shielded from a comprehensive acquisition to access the value of
assets like real estate by asset lock restrictions.
23
The categories of sustainable finance are outlined in Figure 3.3 as an investment approach,
taxonomy by ESG category, and indicative investee profiles and investment strategies.

Figure1.3:

Future Prospects of the Sustainable Finance Market, 2024-2034

It is projected that the sustainable finance market would reach a valuation of US$ 60,35,620.4
million by 2024. By 2034, the industry is expected to be valued US$ 3,76,83,566 million.
Financial institutions are encouraged to include sustainability in their portfolios due to the
increasing demand from investors for investment possibilities that are socially and
environmentally responsible. In response to this need, businesses are trying to draw in more
investors.

From 2024 to 2034, the use of sustainable financing is anticipated to increase at a compound
annual growth rate of 20.10%. Green bonds and loans with sustainability links are two
examples of the innovative sustainable financial solutions that financial institutions are
offering. This diversity takes into account the changing tastes of investors looking for
sustainable investment opportunities.
24
Key Trends Influencing the Sustainable Finance Market

1. The Standard for ESG Integration: ESG integration has evolved into a cornerstone of
financial decision-making, accepted as standard procedure by financial institutions and
investors alike. This change reflects a growing understanding of the significant influence that
ESG issues may have on both financial performance and the overall sustainability picture.
2.Growth of Sustainable Debt and Green Bonds: The rising need for funding solutions
that support socially and ecologically conscious initiatives by governments and
corporations has led to a boom in the popularity of green bonds and sustainable debt
instruments. This pattern indicates a deliberate attempt to allocate funds to projects that
benefit the environment and society.

3. Encouraging Sustainability Reporting through Regulation: Global regulatory agencies

are emphasizing sustainability reporting and requiring companies to reveal their ESG
performance. This regulatory drive brings corporate practices into line with wider
environmental aims by encouraging accountability as well as transparency.

4. Rapid Growth in Sustainable Indices: As ESG considerations become more important

when making investing decisions, sustainable indices are proliferating. These indexes are
becoming more and more important to investors as frameworks for making decisions,
highlighting the incorporation of governance, social, and environmental (ESG) considerations
into investment plans.

5.Innovative Sustainable Financial Products: The sustainable finance environment is being

shaped by ongoing innovation, which has brought in a broad selection of goods such as green
insurance and loans tied to sustainability. Financial institutions are providing distinctive and
significant channels for sustainable investment in response to the changing needs of
investors.

India's Sustainable Finance Sector

It is projected that India's sustainable finance sector will expand at an incredible CAGR of
20.80% until 2034.

• The government offers substantial support for market expansion through initiatives like the
National Green Hydrogen Mission.

25
India has a huge potential for renewable energy, thus large quantities of money are spent in
the projects of the clean energy. With the increase in the number of middle classes with more
available income is rising demand for sustainable funding.

• Investments in environmentally friendly infrastructure projects are crucial to the market's

future growth.

• Through programmed to encourage financial inclusion among the unbanked population,

there are opportunities for long-term financial growth.

Integration of ESGs and Performance

An important non-financial component in evaluating the value of a global firm is its (ESG)
standards. On the other hand, little attention is paid to how individual investors' decisions
about investments are affected by their absorption of ESG information. Park, S. R., & Oh, K.
S. (2022) states that when making investment decisions, investors consult a range of
information sources. There is research done on the dangers of using information when
making investing decisions. The process of incorporating ESG considerations into financial
choices is known as ESG integration. This can mean using ESG data and research to inform
investing choices and integrating ESG risks and opportunities into portfolio management.
Investment portfolios' risk-return profiles could be improved by integrating ESG factors, and
there is growing evidence that companies with strong ESG performance do better over the
long term. Businesses must increase their visibility to individual investors and provide their
data in an understandable manner because these investors typically put their money into well-
known companies. Policymakers and regulators work to enhance business ESG disclosures
and standardized rating agency reports, notwithstanding three standardization and
comparability difficulties. To guarantee that individual investors have access to and use of
data, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission established the Investor
Advisory Committee (IAC). Furthermore, a rising number of countries mandate corporations
to publish their ESG management practices. A recent trend is the use of ESG data into
investment choices. Using ESG data to inform financial decisions could be innovative.
Investment decisions including ESG integration need to adopt a fresh viewpoint distinct from
that of standard risk management.

26
 CHAPTER -2

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Ran Xiao (2023) concludes that there has been a great deal of advancement in the field of
Sustainable finance and ESG investment over the years, because of national and international
rules, investor activism, society and impact on consumer, and investor activism. Due to the
growing recognition of the significance of ESG factors by investors and corporations, there is
now more transparency, ethical behavior, and responsible financial decision-making.
Aligning financial activities with ethical and sustainable values has substantial benefits, as
demonstrated by successful cases in sustainable finance and ESG investment. These case
studies bolster one's faith in responsible finance's capacity to effect constructive change and
build a more sustainable future. On the other hand, difficulties and implementation errors
serve as a constant reminder of how difficult this path is. Obstacles related to regulations,
data scarcity, and opposition to change underscore the necessity of sustained endeavors and
ingenuity in overcoming barriers and furthering the goal of sustainable finance.

According to Boffo, R. and R. Patalano (2020), concludes that there are three main reasons
why ESG standards and investments have drawn a lot of attention recently. First, recent
studies conducted in the fields of academia and industry suggest that ESG investing may
occasionally improve risk management and yield returns on investment that are comparable
to or greater than those of traditional financial investments. People are becoming more aware
of how challenging it is to evaluate ESG performance even in light of the recent study.
Second, data points to the possibility that consumer and investment decisions would be
influenced by societal ideals, which could have an effect on business success. These
decisions include the necessity of diversity in the workforce and on boards and the
advantages of internationally recognized. These decisions include the necessity of diversity in
the workplace and on boards, the advantages of internationally recognized norms for ethical
corporate practices, and the dangers posed by climate change. Third, to enhance longterm
sustainability in investing performance, there is growing burden on the enterprises and
institutions to get away from the short-term risk and return perspectives. Thus, some
investors seek to increase the sustainability of returns over the long run, while others would
prefer to incorporate a more organized connection with societal ideals. In any case, there is
27
growing evidence that the sustainability of finance needs to consider more external factors in
order to maximize long-term revenues and returns while reducing the possibility of scandals
that damage stakeholder confidence.

European Banking Authority (2021) Study concludes that the consequences of

environmental, social, and governance risks manifest as current prudential concerns, such as
credit, market, and operational hazards. Given that ESG concerns are major contributors to
financial risks- particularly those pertaining to capital, liquidity, and funding- the supervisory
examination ought to take these risks into account in a proportionate manner. The evaluation
of (ESG) issues should be integrated and enhance the current supervisory review process, in
terms of both risk level assessment and control review. When evaluating how resilient credit
institutions are to particular scenarios, the application of scenario analysis and stress testing is
crucial.

Gutterman, A. S. (2020) concludes that sustainable finance is a long-term strategy that

prioritizes value creation, long-term planning, and decision-making in finance and investing.
It can also refer to the connections that exist between long-term-oriented financial decisions
that are integrated with the environmentalsocial, and governance ("ESG") considerations and
decisions concerning funding, lending, and investments on the one hand. The European
Commission ("EC") clarified on its webpage that "sustainable finance" generally referred to
the practice of giving proper attention to environmental and social factors when making
investment decisions. choices that result in more money being invested in sustainable and
long-term projects. The European Commission (EC) provided examples of environmental
considerations, such as adaptation and mitigation of climate change, as well as the
environment in general and the risks associated with it, such as natural disasters. On the other
hand, social considerations include things like inequality, inclusivity, communities, labor
relations, and human capital investments.

Phiri, V. (2020) concludes that in when choosing which financial sector investments to
undertake, the EU uses sustainable finance (SF), which is the process of taking
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into account. This approach
encourages longer-term investments in projects and activities that promote sustainable
economic growth. To minimize and adaptation to climate change, labour and relations with
the workers Decisions made in business and finance have an impact effect on society at large.
Lastly, the environmental impact is maximised at the environmental level.
28
Md. Ariful Islam, (2014) Study concludes that even if a lot of powerful and big businesses
have begun to position themselves as strongly committed to sustainability, there is still more
work to be done. Even when they adhere to sustainable development principles, the financial
industry may remain profitable and efficient. However, in order to effectively apply policies,
it must also start broad risk management systems. Financial organizations, such as banks, are
expected to take the lead in incorporating ecological and environmental considerations into
their lending criteria. It is anticipated that this will pressure industries to make environmental
concerns a cohesive component of their investments. The major industry participants will be
encouraged to employ eco-friendly technologies and suitable management practices. Since
the policy still applies to our financial sector the formulation stage, it is quite challenging to
gauge the extent to which our banking and financial sector has embraced the concept of
"Green Financing."

Nicholls, A. (2021) Concludes that there is still a lot of scope for growth in the sustainable
investment market. Above all, there are still gaps and inconsistencies in the regulatory and
transparency framework between nations. The lack of solid and comparable impact
performance data makes it impossible to allocate sustainable money in an efficient manner.
The resultant effects include the potential for impact- or green-washing, as well as inefficient
capital allocation with regard to maximizing financial and social/environmental performance.
The cost of capital allocation transactions is further increased by a deficiency of solid data.
Against this backdrop, policymakers at all the levels can address market imperfections in the
present sustainable financing sector.

Pfaff, N. et al. (2021) Study concludes that the global mainstreaming of initiatives to offer
formal, market-based support for the integrity and expansion of sustainable finance.
Sustainable finance is viewed as a critical instrument to assist address the sustainability and
climate change concerns that developed and emerging markets are becoming more and more
conscious of. As public and private stakeholders in sustainable financing continue to expand,
more taxonomy projects may be established to represent regional or national aims. To ensure
additionality and prevent effort duplication, it will be crucial to utilize current market and
international taxonomies for these endeavors. It will also be crucial to take into account the

29
goals being pursued, whether they relate to sustainability disclosures, financial product
regulation, or classification.

Schoenmaker, D. (2017) concludes that the barriers to the implementation of sustainable

finance are also covered in this book. Governments should enact the proper regulations and
tariffs (such as suitable carbon fees) to remedy the inadequate efforts of corporations. In
order to make informed investment decisions, finance involves anticipating such regulations
and incorporating expectations into today's valuations. Nonetheless, we contend that
governments, businesses, both financial and non-financial, and individuals all have a shared
responsibility for sustainable development, in accordance with the SDGs of the UN. We
believe there a compelling case to include sustainability into finance and strategy.

Ferri, G., & Acosta, B. A. (2019) It emphasizes the significance of green finance initiatives in
mitigating environmental risks and fostering positive societal outcomes. Additionally, it
underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between inequality and finance to
promote inclusive financial systems. The mention of alternative banking models and their
resilience in supporting small and medium-sized businesses during economic challenges
further enriches the discussion. Furthermore, the incorporation of Sustainable and
Responsible Investing (SRI) funds and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)
analysis highlights the practical steps needed to align financial decisions with sustainability
objectives. Overall, the response effectively conveys the critical role of sustainable finance in
realizing sustainable development goals and addressing global challenges.

Leventi, L. (2022) concludes that the phrase "sustainable finance" has been around for a
while in the financial markets, interest in ESG has started to increase following the release of
the EU Sustainable Finance Action Plan. Currently, the European Union has a regulatory
framework that governs ESG matters and prevents or resolves any concerns that may arise
from the usage of ESG criteria in general or from the release of ESG products in particular
(such as Greenwashing). Due to sustainability disclosure requirements, Taxonomy and SFDR
regulations assist FMPs in better product classification and transparency.

30
OBJECTIVES

 To Assess investor attitudes towards sustainable investment opportunities

 To identify the emerging trends in sustainable finance and ESG investing.
 To identify the challenges and opportunities investors face in adoption of sustainable
finance and ESG investing.

31
 CHAPTER-3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Descriptive research design was the research methodology used for this study. Surveys and
various forms of fact-finding are included. People are asked specific questions to help assess
a particular study outcome and draw inferences from it. The main goal of description designs
as they currently exist. The primary feature of this approach is that factors are out of the
researcher's control; we can only report on what has occurred or is occurring. Unlike applied
research, which focuses on specific goals, basic research aims to enhance human knowledge
through discovery, interpretation, recording, and research and development (R&D) of
methods and systems.

Research Design

It is a set of guidelines for gathering the data and analyzing data that seeks to strike a balance
between economy and study objectives. The study used a descriptive research design. If the
researcher has prior knowledge of the events or issues under inquiry, descriptive research
may be utilized to answer a variety of inquiries. The methodology and the opinion survey
method will be used to perform the study.

 The questionnaire is organized and well-structured.

 Individuals provide data for collection

Sources of Data collection

It is of two types:

1. Primary data
2. Secondary data
32
Primary Data: - The word "primary data" refers to information gathered from a source.
Primary data, often known as raw data, are those that have not undergone any processing or
alteration. The original data are those that were gathered from scratch for the first time and
are considered primary. In relation to this study, new data was gathered via questionnaires
that were completed by customers during discussions, interactions, and questionnaire
completion.

Secondary Data: -

In order to assess the current problem, secondary sources of information will be looked at.
We will gather secondary data from a variety of secondary sources, including books, journals,
websites for study papers, and other pertinent sources. To achieve the intended outcomes,
websites and the final data were subjected to a thorough analysis.

Sample Size

The survey was done online with a sample size of 50 respondents directly.

33
 CHAPTER-4

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

1. What is your level of familiarity with sustainable finance and ESG investing
concepts?

a) Very familiar

b) Somewhat familiar

c) Not familiar at all

d) Basic understanding of the topic

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Very familiar 11 22.0 22.0 22.0

Somewhat familiar 18 36.0 36.0 58.0

Not familiar at all 10 20.0 20.0 78.0

34
 Basic 11 22.0 22.0 100.0
understanding

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.1

What is your level of familiarity with sustainable finance and ESG investing concepts?

35
 FIGURE: 2.1

2. What motivates your interest in sustainable finance and ESG investing?

a) Environmental concerns

b) social impact

c) Governance and ethical considerations

d) financial performance potential

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Environmental concerns 15 30.0 30.0 30.0

Social impact 10 20.0 20.0 50.0

Governance and ethical 12 24.0 24.0 74.0

considerations

36
 Financial performance 13 26.0 26.0 100.0
potential

Total 50 100.0 100.0

What motivates your interest in sustainable finance and ESG investing?

37
FIGURE: 2.2

38
3. Have you ever invested in ESG-focused funds or companies?

a) Yes

b) No

c) I'm not sure

d) Considering to invest in future

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Yes 12 24.0 24.0 24.0

No 12 24.0 24.0 48.0

I'm not sure 13 26.0 26.0 74.0

Considering 13 26.0 26.0 100.0

to invest in
future

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.3

39
Have you ever invested in ESG-focused funds or companies?

FIGURE: 2.3

4. What factors do you consider most important when evaluating an investment

opportunity?

a) financial returns

b) Environmental performance

c) social impact
40
d) Governance practices

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Financial returns 12 24.0 24.0 24.0

Environmental 15 30.0 30.0 54.0

performance

Social impact 12 24.0 24.0 78.0

Governance practices 11 22.0 22.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.4

41
What factors do you consider most important when evaluating an investment
opportunity?

FIGURE: 2.4

42
5. How do you perceive the relationship between ESG factors and financial
performance?

a) Strongly positive

b) Somewhat positive

c) Neutral

d) Somewhat negative

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Strongly positive 12 24.0 24.0 24.0

Somewhat positive 14 28.0 28.0 52.0

Neutral 11 22.0 22.0 74.0

Somewhat negative 13 26.0 26.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.5

43
How do you perceive the relationship between ESG factors and financial performance?

FIGURE: 2.5

44
6. Do you believe that companies with strong ESG practices are better positioned to
mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities in the long term?

a) Yes

b) No

c) Not sure

d) I haven’t thought about it

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

ValidYes 13 26.0 26.0 26.0

No 17 34.0 34.0 60.0

Not sure 10 20.0 20.0 80.0

I haven’t 10 20.0 20.0 100.0

thought
about it

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.6

45
Do you believe that companies with strong ESG practices are better positioned to
mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities in the long term?

FIGURE: 2.6

46
7. What barriers do you see to the widespread adoption of sustainable finance and ESG
investing?

a) Lack of awareness or education

b) Limited investment options

c) Regulatory challenges

d) Perceived trade-offs with financial returns

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Lack of awareness or 14 28.0 28.0 28.0

education

Limited investment options 12 24.0 24.0 52.0

Regulatory challenges 12 24.0 24.0 76.0

Perceived trade-offs with 12 24.0 24.0 100.0

financial returns

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.7

47
What barriers do you see to the widespread adoption of sustainable finance and ESG
investing?

FIGURE: 2.7

48
8. How important do you think it is for corporations to disclose their ESG performance
and practices to investors?

a) Very important

b) Somewhat important

c) Not important

d) Neutral

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Very important 13 26.0 26.0 26.0

Somewhat important 17 34.0 34.0 60.0

Not important 7 14.0 14.0 74.0

Neutral 13 26.0 26.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.8

49
How important do you think it is for corporations to disclose their ESG performance
and practices to investors?

FIGURE: 2.8

50
9.What role do you think governments and regulators should play in promoting
sustainable finance and ESG investing?

a) Enforcing disclosure requirements

b) Providing incentives for sustainable investments

c) Implementing regulations to mitigate ESG-related risks

d) Other

What role do you think governments and regulators should play in promoting sustainable
finance and ESG investing?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Enforcing disclosure 13 26.0 26.0 26.0

requirements

Providing incentives for 16 32.0 32.0 58.0

sustainable investments

Implementing regulations 10 20.0 20.0 78.0

to mitigate ESG-related
risks

Other 11 22.0 22.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.9

51
What role do you think governments and regulators should play in promoting
sustainable finance and ESG investing?

FIGURE:2.9

52
10. How do you envision the future of sustainable finance and ESG investing?

a) Continued growth and mainstream adoption

b) Limited impact, remaining niche strategies

c) Transformational change in global financial markets

d) Gradual progression with periodic shifts in emphasis and priorities.

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Continued growth and 12 24.0 24.0 24.0

mainstream adoption

Limited impact, remaining 15 30.0 30.0 54.0

niche strategies

Transformational change in 12 24.0 24.0 78.0

global financial markets

Gradual progression with 11 22.0 22.0 100.0

periodic shifts in emphasis
and priorities.

Total 50 100.0 100.0

TABLE: 3.10

53
How do you envision the future of sustainable finance and ESG investing?

FIGURE: 2.10

54
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
What is your level of 50 1.00 4.00 2.4200 1.07076
familiarity with sustainable
finance and ESG investing
concepts?
What motivates your interest 50 1.00 4.00 2.4600 1.18166
in sustainable finance and
ESG investing?
Have you ever invested in 50 1.00 4.00 2.5400 1.12866
ESG-focused funds or
companies?
What factors do you 50 1.00 4.00 2.4400 1.09096
consider most important
when evaluating an
investment opportunity?
How do you perceive the 50 1.00 4.00 2.5000 1.12938
relationship between ESG
factors and financial
performance?
Do you believe that 50 1.00 4.00 2.3400 1.08063
companies with strong ESG
practices are better
positioned to mitigate risks
and capitalize on
opportunities in the long
term?
What barriers do you see to 50 1.00 4.00 2.4400 1.14571
the widespread adoption of
sustainable finance and ESG
investing?
How important do you think 50 1.00 4.00 2.4000 1.14286
it is for corporations to
disclose their ESG
performance and practices to
investors?
What role do you think 50 1.00 4.00 2.3800 1.10454
governments and regulators
should play in promoting
sustainable finance and ESG
investing?
How do you envision the 50 1.00 4.00 2.4400 1.09096
future of sustainable finance
and ESG investing?
Valid N (listwise) 50
TABLE: 4.1

55
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Pair 1 What is your level of 2.4200 50 1.07076 .15143
familiarity with sustainable
finance and ESG investing
concepts?
What motivates your 2.4600 50 1.18166 .16711
interest in sustainable
finance and ESG investing?
TABLE: 4.2

Mean: The mean indicates the average score given by participants for each question.

For the question regarding familiarity with sustainable finance and ESG investing concepts,
the mean score is 2.4200.

For the question regarding motivation, the mean score is 2.4600.

N (Sample Size): This is the number of participants who provided responses for both
questions. In this case, the sample size is 50.

Standard Deviation: The standard deviation measures the spread or dispersion of the scores
around the mean.

For the question on familiarity, the standard deviation is 1.07076.

For the question on motivation, the standard deviation is 1.18166.

Standard Error of the Mean: The standard error of the mean indicates the precision of the
sample mean as an estimate of the population mean. It is calculated by dividing the standard
deviation by the square root of the sample size. For the question on familiarity, the standard
error of the mean is 0.15143.

For the question on motivation, the standard error of the mean is 0. 16711.These statistics
provide insights into the central tendency (mean), variability (standard deviation), and
precision (standard error of the mean) of responses to both questions on sustainable finance
56
and ESG investing. The mean scores suggest that, on average, respondents reported slightly
higher levels of motivation compared to familiarity with these concepts. However, the
standard deviations indicate variability in responses, and the standard errors of the mean give
an idea of the reliability of these estimates

Paired Samples Correlations

Significance

N Correlation One-Sided p Two-Sided p

Pair 1 What is your level of 50 -.091 .264 .528

familiarity with sustainable
finance and ESG investing
concepts? & What
motivates your interest in
sustainable finance and
ESG investing?

TABLE: 4.3

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences T df Significance

57
 95% Confidence
Std. Interval of the
Std. Error Difference One- Two-
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper Sided p Sided p
Pair What is your -.04000 1.66550 .23554 -.51333 .43333 -.170 49 .433 .866
1 level of
familiarity
with
sustainable
finance and
ESG
investing
concepts? -
What
motivates
your interest
in sustainable
finance and
ESG
investing?
TABLE: 4.4

Paired Samples Effect Sizes

58
 95% Confidence
Point Interval
Standardizera Estimate Lower Upper
Pair 1 What is your level of Cohen's d 1.66550 -.024 -.301 .253
familiarity with Hedges' 1.69154 -.024 -.296 .249
sustainable finance correction
and ESG investing
concepts? - What
motivates your interest
in sustainable finance
and ESG investing?
a. The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes.
Cohen's d uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference.
Hedges' correction uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference, plus a
correction factor.
TABLE: 4.5

59
 CHAPTER-5

CONCLUSION
The necessity of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing and sustainable
financing is more important than ever in a time of growing environmental concerns, social
inequality, and corporate governance problems. Amidst the world's urgent issues, the
financial industry has become a potent agent of good transformation. Adopting sustainable
finance and ESG investing has real advantages for investors, businesses, and society at large
in addition to being in line with moral values. At the heart of sustainable finance lies a
commitment to integrate ESG criteria in the financial decisionmaking processes.
Environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and sound governance practices are no
longer merely ethical considerations; they are essential factors for assessing investment
opportunities. By incorporating these elements, sustainable finance aims to foster long-term
value creation while promoting sustainable development.

One of the cornerstones of sustainable finance is environmental sustainability. With the

specter of climate change looming large, investors are increasingly cognizant of the
environmental footprint of their investments. Businesses that put a high priority on projects
including cutting carbon emissions, switching to renewable energy, and integrating
sustainable practices into their supply chains are viewed favorably by investors. Beyond
mitigating environmental risks, these actions position companies to capitalize on emerging
opportunities when the economy shifts to a low-carbon one.

Social responsibility is another key pillar of sustainable finance. Investors recognize the
importance of supporting companies that uphold ethical labor practices, respect human rights,
and engage meaningfully with local communities. By considering social factors such as
workforce diversity, employee well-being, and community engagement, investors can
contribute to building more inclusive and equitable societies. Moreover, companies that
prioritize social responsibility often enjoy enhanced brand reputation and customer loyalty,
further bolstering their long-term viability.
60
Effective governance is fundamental to the success of sustainable finance initiatives. Sound
governance practices, including transparent decision-making processes, independent board
oversight, and alignment of executive incentives with long-term sustainability goals, are
essential for building trust and confidence among investors. Companies that demonstrate
robust governance structures are better equipped to navigate complex challenges and
capitalize on opportunities while maintaining the trust of their stakeholders.

An effective framework for incorporating factors into investment decisions is offered by ESG
investing. By evaluating companies based on their performance in these areas, investors can
identify chances that complement their long-term financial goals and attitudes.
Environmental criteria, such as carbon emissions intensity and resource efficiency, offer
insights into a firm environmental stewardship. Social criteria, including labor practices and
community relations, shed light on a company's commitment to social responsibility.
Governance criteria, such as board composition and executive compensation, provide
indicators of a company's management quality and alignment with shareholder interests.

The benefits of embracing sustainable finance and ESG investing are manifold. Firstly, these
approaches offer a robust framework for risk management, enabling investors to identify and
mitigate potential risks associated with environmental, social, and governance issues.
Companies that effectively manage ESG risks are better positioned to weather disruptions
and deliver sustainable long-term returns to investors.

Secondly, sustainable finance and ESG investing have been shown to correlate positively
with financial performance. Several studies have shown that businesses with a good ESG
reputation typically outperform their competitors . Investors may be able to improve risk-
adjusted returns while also making a good impact on the environment and society by
incorporating ESG factors into their investment strategies. Additionally, ESG and sustainable
finance offer investors a chance to match their values and financial objectives. In addition to
financial rewards, impact investors, in particular, aim to provide beneficial social and
environmental impact. Impact investors are vital to promoting good change and the
achievement of sustainable development goals because they provide funding to businesses
and initiatives that tackle urgent global issues.

61
Regulatory drivers are also accelerating the adoption of sustainable finance and ESG
investing practices. Regulators and policymakers around the world are increasingly
mandating ESG disclosure requirements and integrating sustainability considerations into
financial regulations. As regulatory expectations evolve, investors and companies alike are
compelled to prioritize ESG factors in their decision-making processes, further
mainstreaming sustainable finance principles. In conclusion, sustainable finance and ESG
investing represent a paradigm shift in the financial industry, emphasizing the importance of
integrating environmental, social, and governance considerations into investment decisions.
As stewards of capital, investors have a unique opportunity and responsibility to leverage
their influence for the greater good, harnessing the power of finance to create positive change
in the world

62
 References
 Ferri, G., & Acosta, B. A. (2019). Sustainable finance for sustainable development.
Center for Relationship Banking and Economics Working Paper Series, 30.
 Leventi, L. (2022). The growing role of Environmental, Social and Governance
(ESG) criteria in investments.
 Ran Xiao, Jiaqi Deng, Yuting Zhou, & Meng Chen. (2023). Analyzing Contemporary
Trends in Sustainable Finance and ESG Investment. aw and economy, 2(11), 44–52.
 Barclays. (2021). Barclays sustainable finance framework. Available
at:http://home.barclays/content/dam/home-barclays/documents/citizenship/ESG/
Barclays-Sustainable-Finance-Framework-2020.pdf
 Park, S. R., & Oh, K. S. (2022). Integration of ESG information into individual
investors’ corporate investment decisions: Utilizing the UTAUT framework. Frontiers
in psychology, 13, 899480.

 Sustainable Finance Market Outlook for 2024 to 2034

https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sustainable-finance-market

 Boffo, R., and R.Patalano(2020). ESG investing: practices, progress and challenges.
Paris: OECD.Availableat:www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-
and-Challenges.pdf
 Deutsche Bank Group. (2020). Sustainable finance framework–Deutsche Bank
Group. DB.
 European Banking Authority (2021) Factsheet on ESG Risks Management and
Supervision. Luxembourg: EU. Available at :https://www.eba.europa.eu /sites/default
/documets/files/document_library/News%20and%20Press/Communication
%20materials /Factsheets/1015657/ESG%20risk%20Factsheet.pdf
 European Union. (2019) EU Taxonomy: technical expert group on sustainable
finance.EU
 European Commission(n.d.). Sustainable finance Developing and Implementing
Sustainable Finance Taxonomies: The Case of the EU Taxonomy for Sustainable
Activities. EU.

63
  FTSE Russell: An introduction to sustainable investing. Available
at:http://content
.ftserussell.com/sites/default/files/an_introduction_to_sustainable_investing_final.pdf
 Gladwin, T. et al. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development:
Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management
Review,20(4):874-907.Availableat:https://doi.org/10.2307/258959
 Green Bond Principles (2018, 2021). GBP Voluntary process guidelines for issuing
green bonds. Paris: ICMA. Available at: https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/
documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Green-Bond-Principles-June-2021-
140621.pdf
 Gutterman, A.S. (2020). Sustainable finance. Available at: https:// www.researchgate.
net/publication/350787492Hesary,F,T.andYoshino,N.(2020).Sustainable solutions for
green financing and investment in renewable energy
 Phiri, V. (2020). SUSTAINABLE FINANCE. Education, 2024. Projects. Tokyo:
Energies. Available at: dx.doi.org

  Md. Ariful Islam, Salahuddin Yousuf, Kh. Fahim Hossain, Md. Rayhan Islam, (2014).
Green financing in Bangladesh: challenges and opportunities a descriptive
 approachInt.J.GreenEconomics,Vol.8,No.1,pp.74–91.
 Nicholls, A. (2021). Sustainable finance: a primer and recent developments. Asian
Development Outlook, 1-51.
 OECD.(2020).Developing sustainable finance definitions and taxonomies: a brief for
policy makers. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1787/134a2dbe-en.
 Pfaff, N. et al. (2021). ICMA: Overview and Recommendations for Sustainable
Finance Taxonomies. Zurich, ICMA Ramiah, Vand Gregoriou, G.N. (eds.) (2016).
Handbook of environmental and sustainable finance. Elsevier Inc.
 Rogers, P.P.etal. (2008). An Introduction to sustainable development Glen
Educational Foundation, Inc.
 Sachsetal. (2019). Why is green finance important?
ADBIWorkingPaper917.Tokyo:Asian
DevelopmentBankInstitute.Availableat:https://www.adb.org/publications/why-green-
finance-important 2019.
 Semenova, N. et al. (2020). Green financing as a condition for sustainable economic
growth. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.851
64
 Schoenmaker, D (2017). Investing for the common good: a sustainable finance
framework. Bruegel: Brussels. Schoenmaker, D. and S chramade, W. (2019). A frame
work for sustainable finance. Available at: https:// www.researchgate. net/
publication/ 330359025
 Silver, N (2017). Finance, society and sustainability how to make the financial system
work for the economy, people and planet. London: Macmillan Publishers ltd.
Available at: DOI10.1057/978-1-137-56061-2
 Sustainable Development Report (2021). Report of the inter-agency task force on
financing for development. New York: United Nations.
 United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable
development A/RES/70/1. United Nations General Assembly, New York.
 United Nations. (2016). Sustainable development goals. Report. New York.
 UNEPFI (2020). Annual overview: creating a financial industry that positively
impacts and serves people and planet. UN.
 UNWCED.1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Ziolo, M. etal. (2020). The role of sustainable finance in achieving sustainable
development goals: does it work ?

65
 QUESTIONNIARE

1. What is your level of familiarity with sustainable finance and ESG investing concepts?

a) Very familiar

b) Somewhat familiar

c) Not familiar at all

d) Basic understanding of the topic

2. What motivates your interest in sustainable finance and ESG investing?

a) Environmental concerns

b) social impact

c) Governance and ethical considerations

d) financial performance potential

3. Have you ever invested in ESG-focused funds or companies?

a) Yes

b) No

c) I'm not sure

d) Considering to invest in future

4. What factors do you consider most important when evaluating an investment opportunity?

a) financial returns

b) Environmental performance

c) social impact

66
d) Governance practices

5. How do you perceive the relationship between ESG factors and financial performance?

a) Strongly positive

b) Somewhat positive

c) Neutral

d) Somewhat negative

6. Do you believe that companies with strong ESG practices are better positioned to mitigate
risks and capitalize on opportunities in the long term?

a) Yes

b) No

c) Not sure

d) I haven’t thought about it

7. What barriers do you see to the widespread adoption of sustainable finance and ESG
investing?

a) Lack of awareness or education

b) Limited investment options

c) Regulatory challenges

d) Perceived trade-offs with financial returns

8. How important do you think it is for corporations to disclose their ESG performance and
practices to investors?

a) Very important

b) Somewhat important

67
c) Not important

d) Neutral

9. What role do you think governments and regulators should play in promoting sustainable
finance and ESG investing?

a) Enforcing disclosure requirements

b) Providing incentives for sustainable investments

c) Implementing regulations to mitigate ESG-related risks

d) Other

10. How do you envision the future of sustainable finance and ESG investing?

a) Continued growth and mainstream adoption

b) Limited impact, remaining niche strategies

c) Transformational change in global financial markets

d)Gradual progression with periodic shifts in emphasis and priorities.

68