Professional Documents
Culture Documents
heat absorption
mechanical work
heat machine
heat release
output work
boiler
ST
condenser
BFP
Rankine Cycle
1.1 The function, importance and basic requirement of BFP
thermodynamic system
1.1 The function, importance and basic requirement of BFP
Vorecon efficiency
small ST efficiency
Relationship between saving and earning
Saving based on coal consumption reduction
o coal consumption rate in the power supply system
o save primary energy
o real power saving and emission reduction
o power price increases rapidly: good time for pushing power saving
equipment with high efficiency
earning based on power supply income increase
o plant power consumption reduction
o increase power supply
o coal consumption rate is not considered possibly
o coal price lower, income better
o ST driving pump is preferred for most power plants, at the
condition of present power network dispatching
o coal price……???
二、 Thermal efficiency analysis
methods of BFP
2.1 Constant flow analysis method
2.2 ST driving pump solution
2.3 Motor driving pump solution
2.4 solutions comparison
2.1 Constant flow analysis method
Constant flow analysis method
basic conditions
o initial and final parameters of steam and
reheat steam of main ST: same
o Feed water temperature and steam flow: equal
o Total power N of ST driving generator: completely equal
o Shaft power of BFP: equal
driving type
o small ST driving BFP: ST driving pump solution
• part of steam off main ST, main ST makes less work
o hydraulic coupling driving BFP: motor driving pump solution
power supply from Busbar of main unit outlet, so main unit
generates less power.
Comparison result
o there is difference on net power generated (switch into the grid)
2.2 ST driving pump solution
net output power
汽
N净 = N 总 − ∆N
序 unit
机组等级及容量 主要设efficiency(%)
main part 备的效率(%)
item
capacity 备注
remark
号 (MW)
(MW) ηriHP ηriIP ηriLP ηm ηg
super high pressure
1 超 高压125、200
125,200
83~85 91~93 86~88 98 98
2 亚 临界300、
sub-critical 600
300,600 87~89 92~94 89~91 99~ ~99
suppercritical
3 超 临界600、660
600,660 86~88 91~93 89~91 99~ ~99
ultra-supercritical
4 超超临界1000
1000 86~88 92~94 90~92 99~ 99
Operation character of main ST under variable conditions
over 30~40% load
o big scale unit: composite sliding pressure operation type
o flow efficiency in ST(except the last several stages of low pressure
cylinder): no big change
o mechanical efficiency、generator efficiency: slight drop
annual operation time in coal fired units
设计条件运行
annual operation 实际运行
actual annual 主力机组
annual 全国平均
average operation
负荷水平
load hours at design operation hours operation hours hours in the whole
每年小时数
data 每年小时数 每年小时数
of main unit 每年小时数
nation
N给水泵 = N η = Gex ∆h η η
p
BFPT m
p p
ex ri m
enthalpy drop of small ST
∆hex = ∆H exη thpη aup
total efficiency of electrical energy transmission
ηd = ηtηmtηmeη fc
Small ST efficiency at 50% of capacity in sub-critical 600MW unit
decrease along with
the load drop of
main ST
lower efficiency at
lower load
主要项目
item 单位
unit 工况1
point 1 工况2
point 2 工况3
point 3 工况44
point
负荷水平
load / 100% 75% 50% 40%
机组负荷
capacity MW 600 450 300 240
efficiency of
小机A效率 % 82.87 78.72 68.63 65.15
small ST A
efficiency of
小机B效率
small ST B
% 82.88 78.37 68.09 65.72
average
小机平均效率 % 82.88 78.55 68.36 65.47
efficiency of
small ST
Steam enthalpy drop loss of small ST
for example, 50% capacity of small ST in sub-critical 600MW unit
o resistance loss and shaft seal leakage loss included in small ST
efficiency
o around 5% of enthalpy drop loss due to pipe resistance, heat emission
loss and exhaust pressure increase
o in case of high pressure steam, bigger throttle loss
主要项目
item 单位
unit 工况1
point 1 工况2
point 2 工况3
point 3 工况4
point 4
负荷水平
load / 100% 75% 50% 40%
机组负荷
capacity MW 600 450 300 240
∆H ex kJ/kg 849.1 823.1 738 763.2
小机A
efficiency of ∆hex kJ/kg 809.7 782 696.5 722
small ST A
η thp % 95.36 95.01 94.38 94.6
∆H ex kJ/kg 811.7 826.7 742.7 767.4
efficiency of
small小机B
ST B ∆hex kJ/kg 851.1 786.5 701.2 726.3
η thp % 95.37 95.14 94.41 94.64
average efficiency
小机平均 % 95.37 95.08 94.4 94.62
η p
th
of small ST
Efficiency change reference value for a certain motor
主 要项目
item
单位
unit
工 况1
point 1
工况2
point 2
工况3
point 3
工 况4
point 4
负 荷水平
load
/ 100% 75% 50% 40%
电机平均效率
motor average
efficiency % 96.4 96.2 95.6 95
Efficiency character of hydraulic coupling
load
负荷水平 / 100% 75% 50% 40%
普通增速齿轮型
geared variable speed
coupling % 92.5 84 72.5 68
液力偶合器效率
高效行星齿轮型
variable speed planetary
gear % 95 95 92 86
液力偶合器效率
2.4 Solutions comparison
comparison between ST driving and motor driving
o ——net output power
• “+ ”—— better for ST driving pump
• “- ”——better for motor driving pump
∆N 净 = N 净汽 − N 净
电
= N 给水泵 K
2. 4.1 Solution comparison 1
a certain sub-critical 600MW unit
at design data of full load
geared variable speed coupling
o ST driving pump better sligtly than motor driving type
o annual utilization hours is 5500,ST driving solution has 76.2 x 104
kwh of more power than motor driving solution
ηaup ηriηmηg
∆N净 = N给水泵 − p p p
η η η η η η η
e
t mt m fc th ri m
η p
η riη mη g
∆N 净 = N 给水泵 au
− p p p
η η η η e
η η η
t mt m fc th ri m
0.9882 0.905 × 0.992 × 0.986
= N 给水泵 −
0.98 × 0.964 × 0.98 × 0.95 0.9537 × 0.8288 × 0.98
= 12410 × (− 0.01920)
= −238(kW )
2.4.3 Solution comparison 3
variable conditions
o thermal efficiency comparison: a certain sub-critical 600MW unit
o “+”means better for ST solution,“-”means better for motor solution.
主要项目
item 单位
unit 工 况11
point 工 况22
point 工 况33
point 工 况44
point
负荷水平
load / 100% 75% 50% 40%
机组负荷
capacity MW 600 450 300 240
N
给total
水泵 总功
power of率
BFP kW 12410 8176 3434 3740
N 给水泵
普通
geared 系数
coefficient / 0.01117 0.05592 0.03873 0.09038
增速齿轮型 K
variable
speed ∆N 净
液力偶合器 kW 139 457 133 338
coupling
∆N 净 N 给水泵
% 1.12 5.59 3.87 9.04
∆N 净 N 给水泵
% -1.92 -9.06 -26.62 -23.37
① For motor driving solution with geared variable speed coupling, due to low
coupling efficiency, total transmission efficiency is lower than ST driving
solution, whatever design data or variable conditions. Therefore, motor
driving solution with geared variable speed coupling is less competitive for
equal to and over 600MW unit.
③ For motor driving solution with variable speed planetary gear, efficiency is
higher than ST driving solution, whatever design data or variable conditions.
Therefore, motor driving solution with variable speed planetary gear is
more competitive for 600MW unit.
④ Even though load of main ST decrease, motor driving solution is better than
ST driving solution, as efficiency of variable speed planetary gear is over
90% at over 50% of load.
Variable conditions
主要项目
item 单位
unit 机组1
unit 1 机组2
unit 2 机组3
unit 3 机组4
unit 4
年利用小时数
annual utilization hours hour
小时 6500 5990 5680 5344
主机总发电功率
total power generation 10亿度
8 kwh
39 35.94 34.08 32.06
给水泵总耗功量
total power consumption of BFP 10亿度
8 kwh 0.7463 0.6673 0.6238 0.5869
给水泵耗功占主机发电比
%
BFP power / power generation 1.91 1.86 1.83 1.83
率
给泵耗功增 104 kwh
普通 万度 181.1 194.4 180.7 (+170.0)
geared 益
variable 给泵相对增
增速齿轮型 % 2.43 2.91 2.9 (+2.90)
speed 益
coupling 主机效率增
液力偶合器 % 0.0464 0.0541 0.053 (+0.053)
益
给泵耗功增 104 kwh
高效 万度 -391.1 -443.54 -445.3 (-419.0)
variable 益
speed 给泵相对增
行星齿轮型 % -5.24 -6.65 -7.14 (-7.14)
planetary 益
gear 主机效率增
液力偶合器 % -0.1003 -0.1234 -0.1307 (-0.131)
益
Annual operation conditions
o case二:
– modification of a heating supply unit : motor driving pump
modified to steam driving pump
» steam extraction parameters are far higher than parameters
required by end user
» using back pressure small ST, part works used to drive BFP
» energy cascade use
3.2 Wet cooling big scale unit
300MW unit
o sub-critical parameter
• 300MW、330MW、350MW
o boundary of conventional variable speed motor pump and ST pump
• thermal efficiency is equivalent
– advantage of ST pump: save plant power consumption
– advantage of moto pump: simple system
• typical solution
– 50%×2 ST pump+(30~50)%×1 motor pump
– 100 %×1 ST pump+(30~50)%×1motor pump: higher ST pump
efficiency
– 50%×3 motor pump: BEIZHONG unit, depending on main ST design
concept