1
Name of Demo Teacher: THISHA MAE PANALIGAN
Name of Evaluator/s: Kristine Avile Grade given by evaluator: 91
Grade Level: 7 Topic: Organize statistical data in a frequency distribution table
CONTINUE
• Great energy at the beginning
• Handled the technical problem
professionally.
• Checked thoroughly if all her students are
present
• Continuously reminding students to open
their camera.
• Constantly checking if the students are
being able to follow through and are able
to access the website link.
• Guides students on how to unmute their
microphone.
• The teacher was able to explain the step-
by-step way of solving for frequency in
an easier way to understand.
• It is good that the teacher used a drawing
method while presenting so she can
explain more clearly the problem.
• Rich in positive reinforcements
Date: 3/24/2024
AVOID
• Presenting your whole screen.
• The teacher seems to be in a rush.
• Dwell too long in attendance.
• Internet is not stable and her (though this
is not the fault of the teacher.
• The teacher overlooked that one of her
students have their mic open and is
distracting due to the sound that it is
making, even though the teacher is
notified.
• Questions are not clear.
• Questions are too leading. ‘Honesty’ as
an answer is almost a giveaway.
• The teacher did not memorize her
processing questions. She kept looking at
her copy which is very visible during her
demo.
• The teacher’s questions were too focused
on Values Education, and was no longer
just an integration.
• Putting the learning objectives after the
motivation.
• Improve color scheme of presentation.
• Some of the students turned off their
cameras.
 2

NOT
VALUES INTEGRATION RUBRICS OBSERVED REMARKS
OBSERVED
1. Observed clear connection between the value and the
/
topic.
2. Used good processing questions. /
3. Value was elicited from the students. /
4. Value was integrated naturally and creatively. /
5. Value integration was successful or unsuccessful. / successful

Kristine Mae V. Avila, sgd.

Evaluator’s Name and Signature