You are on page 1of 2

1

Name of Demo Teacher: Hidalgo, Pamela Jean G. Date: April 6, 2024


Name of Evaluator/s: Joanna Angelina Dela Cruz Grade given by evaluator: 90
Grade Level: 7 Topic: Figures of Speech

CONTINUE AVOID

• Good motivation before starting the • There is stuttering in the beginning of


formal discussion (talking about book class; present with outmost confidence
genres), can let learners talk about their • The materials were not presented right
experiences away – there is dead air online
• Very interesting ppt presentation, and site • During the attendance checking, the slide
for learners to use present was for virtual classroom rules.
Wrong slide presented
• It’s good she notifies the class whenever
• Internet problems (which is inevitable)
she has to do something else instead of
• Literary genre was asked with the
muting herself right away.
attendance checking but different genres
• Letting learners read the passages (such as fantasy, romance) was answered.
• Good pronunciation of the figures of No correction
speech (such as hyperbole) which is often • The activity using a specific site was not
a mistake for other teachers utilized at best, such as time running out
• Good during reading activity before the student answering
• Good encouragement with the students, • There are certain vocabularies that are
especially for students who are afraid to not well understood by the learners such
answer as daffodils (which is a new word for
• Even though that this is an ESL class, them).
good use of L1, especially when the • Central theme of the poem was asked,
there should be an activity to assess
learner is having a hard time
learner’s prior knowledge or to have a
understanding the question quick recap
• Good choice of asking every student their • Time limitation is mentioned which can
interactions and participation to keep rush the learner’s learning in class
them interested and learning because of the mentioned rushed time
• Asking the students if they have questions • “Communal” – teacher term/jargon
or clarifications
2

NOT
VALUES INTEGRATION RUBRICS OBSERVED REMARKS
OBSERVED
1. Observed clear connection between the value and the Learners
topic. ✔ understood
critical thinking
and has good
connection
2. Used good processing questions. Good
processing
✔ questions which
activates critical
thinking
3. Value was elicited from the students. Value was able
✔ recognized by
the learner
4. Value was integrated naturally and creatively. Value was
integrated
✔ naturally – good
job!
5. Value integration was successful or unsuccessful. ✔ SUCCESSFUL!

Joanna Angelina Dela Cruz


_____________________________________
Evaluator’s Name and Signature

You might also like