04.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school stude
nts are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others thin
k it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and
give your own opinion.

Nhiều ý kiến cho rằng để nâng cao chất lượng giáo dục, học sinh phổ thông được khu
yến khích góp ý, thậm chí phê bình giáo viên. Những người khác nghĩ rằng nó sẽ dẫn
đến mất sự tôn trọng và kỷ luật trong lớp học. Thảo luận về cả hai quan điểm và đưa r
a ý kiến của riêng bạn.

PLANING

LD1: that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encourage
d to make comments or even criticism on their teachers

LD2: Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom
- students are still in the process of developing => their cognitive abilities and lack emotional
maturity => might not be able to provide objective judgments
- those who are impulsive can make harsh criticism=> disrespect and trigger poor behavior

However, many people believe that allowing students to make comments and criticism might
be not

People hold different views about whether high school students should be allowed to
evaluate and criticize their teachers. Although some may argue that this could lead to
a decline in respect and discipline, believe that constructive feedback from students ca
n contribute to the betterment of education.

[Intro 2: There has been an ongoing debate on the input of high school students in ev
aluating and criticising their teachers. Although this practice can lead to a decline in re
spect and discipline, am of the opinion that constructive feedback from students can c
ontribute to the betterment of education].

Proponents/ advocates of the idea that teacher appraisal should not be encouraged a
mong high school learners may claim that most of those students are still in the proce
ss of developing their cognitive abilities and lack emotional maturity. In other words, t
hey are likely to be influenced by personal biases and as a result, might not be able to
provide objective judgments that accurately reflect the performance of their teachers.
In worse cases, those who are impulsive can make harsh criticism, which may cause dis
respect and trigger poor behavior among hostile students. This could result in a negati
ve impact on the learning environment.
However, there are strong arguments in support of the notion of allowing students to
evaluate their teachers. Gaining valuable insight from student feedback might enable t
eachers to refine their teaching methods, enhance their competence, and make appro
priate adjustments for the better attainment of students' learning objectives. This appr
oach can also provide high school students with a platform where they can express th
eir thoughts/ [voice their opinion] about teachers and their lessons. This can be seen a
s an opportunity for them to actively engage in constructive dialogue and hone their c
ommunication and critical thinking skills, which is of great value to their professional e
ndeavors later in life.

In conclusion, there are valid concerns about the impact of empowering high school st
udents the ability to assess their teachers. However, these drawbacks are far outweigh
ed by the benefits that this practice can bring and believe that it is a good instrument
to improve the quality of education.

Bài làm

ĐỀ: Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are
encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to
a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.

It is true that encouraging high school students make comments and even criticize their
teachers can contribute to improving the quality of education. However, others believe that it
might cause a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. In this essay, I will examine
both perspectives before reaching my conclusion.

Many people believe that teachers can derive from students valuable feedback and
contribute to an improvement in educational quality. This is reflected in it might enable
teachers to refine their teaching methods, and make appropriate adjustments for the better
attainment of students' learning objectives teachers. As a result, they are more likely to have
a chance to better their pedagogical skills. In addition, while open discussion, they can try to
both discuss the problems, express their own opinions, and eventually come up with a
solution. This approach will provide the clear advantage of making students proactive in
studying, and also equips students with critical thinking skills, which is of great value to their
occupations and careers later in life. In this way, both the learners and the educators can
achieve higher academically.

However, others argue that allowing students to make comments and criticism there is not
too efficient in contributing to the development of education. This is because high school
students are still in the process of cognitive development and lack emotional maturity, they
tend to be more influenced by personal biases. As a result, their opinions are non-objective
assessments that not be able to reflect the work of teachers effectively. Additionally, it
causes a lack of respect and order in a classroom, especially with those who are impulsive
and can make harsh criticism. For instance, since students are hostile toward the teacher for
giving bad marks or reprimanding, they would sabotage the teacher’s reputation by giving
unjust criticisms. This, in the end, will lead to disrespect and trigger poor behavior in their
classroom may even negative effect on education.
All things considered, there are valid arguments for both approaches. However, it seems to
me that the benefits of allowing high school students to perform their feedback for teachers
are important factors that contribute to quality development education more than the
disadvantages it can bring.