Calculation Sheet H304

DOCTYPE DOC Nº:
CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT: SHEET
1 of 32
JOB:
UNIT:
STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

CLIENT AFE: INTERNAL CONTRACT No:
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: COMPANY NAME:

CIVIL
INDEX OF REVISIONS
REV. DESCRIPTION AND/OR REVISED SHEETS
0 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION
REV. 0 REV.1 REV.2 REV.3 REV.4 REV.5 REV.6 REV.7 REV.8

DATE 10-Apr-22
PROJECT xxxxxxx
EXECUTION CG
VERIFICATION FM
APPROVAL AM
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF N&A USA AND ITS LICENSER AND MAY BE USED ONLY WITH THEIR PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
2 of
26
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3
2. CODES AND STANDARDS ............................................................................................. 3
3. MATERIAL PROPERTIES ................................................................................................ 3
4. SOFTWARE USED .......................................................................................................... 3
5. SKID FOR DANIEL ULTRASONIC METER ..................................................................... 4
5.1. Materials properties .................................................................................................... 5
5.2. Profiles ........................................................................................................................ 5
5.4. Loading plan ............................................................................................................... 6
5.4.1. Self deadweight (DEAD) ...................................................................................... 6
5.4.2. Piping Load (LOAD) ............................................................................................. 6
5.5. LIFTING boundary conditions ..................................................................................... 7
5.6. ANALYSIS COMBINATONS ...................................................................................... 8
5.7. Results (COMB2)........................................................................................................ 9
5.7.1. Joint displacement ............................................................................................... 9
5.7.2. Unit check (COMB3) .......................................................................................... 10
5.7.3. Cable Tensile ..................................................................................................... 10
5.7.4. Pad Eye.............................................................................................................. 14
5.7.5. Wire rope............................................................................................................ 18
5.7.6. Spreader Bar P8” ............................................................................................... 19
5.7.7. Pad eye on top of Spreader Bar ......................................................................... 20
5.7.8. Plate of pad eye on botton of Spreader Bar ....................................................... 24
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
3 of
26
1. INTRODUCTION
This document is aimed at the verification of the Lifting conditions of the steel structure of
DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID.
These calculation notes should be read in conjunction with other project documents, listed
below (item 4). This way they complement each other, describing the service to be performed
and the materials to be used.
2. CODES AND STANDARDS

AISC - Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design 9th Edition, 1989
AWS D 1.1 - Structural Welding Code-Steel, 1998.
Noble Denton – Guidelines for Lifting Operations by Floating Crane Vessels, 2002.
3. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
• Rolled Profiles: HP – ASTM A992 Gr. 50 → Fy ≥ 50 ksi (350 MPa), Fu ≥ 58 ksi (400
MPa).
• Plates: ASTM A36 → Fy ≥ 36 ksi (248 MPa), Fu ≥ 65 ksi (490 MPa).
• 6x19AA Class Wire Rope, General Use, Fiber Core.
• Welds: AWS E7018 → Fu ≥ 70 ksi (482 MPa)
4. SOFTWARE USED
Microsoft Excel, Ansys 16.
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
4 of
26
5. SKID FOR DANIEL ULTRASONIC METER
The Structural analysis, the determination of internal forces and dimensioning of elements were
performed with the computer software "Ansys 16”.
For the design of frames the “Allowable Stress Design method" (ASD)” was considered,
according to the AISC rules.
Only the profiles of the primary structure will be analyzed in this review of the calculation note.
Figure 1 – 3D Model
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
5 of
26
5.1. Materials properties
Figure 2 – ASTM A992 Gr. 50
5.2. Profiles
Figure 3 – W12”x35
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
6 of
26
5.3. Loading plan
5.3.1. Self deadweight (DEAD)

The Ansys software shall automatically generate the forces due to the weight of modeled
structures.
5.3.2. Piping Load (LOAD)

Piping Empty loads were applied like DataSheet
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
7 of
26
Figure 4 – Datasheet informations
Dummy elements, without self weight, were criated to linking CoG to supports base as
shown bellow:
Figure 5 – Applied load (lbf)
5.4. LIFTING boundary conditions

Skid will be lifted vertically by four lift points with one spreader bars. The following
figure illustrates the lifting arrangement:
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
8 of
26
In order to simulate this condition, one point was restrained in all three axis for
translation. The other joint were restrained inly for translation in Z.
5.5. ANALYSIS COMBINATONS
Three combinations will be made:
COMB1 (static): only the self weight and the weight of the pipe will be considered.
This combination will be used to obtain the forces in the sling and subsequent
dimensioning of pad eyes through manual calculations.
COMB2 (dynamic): the applied loads of self weight and weight of the pipes will be
increased by the 4 factors foreseen in Noble Denton GL 0027: fcp, fcog, SKL, and
DAF. This combination is used for the dimensioning of the skid assessories.
COMB3 (consequence): the applied loads of self weight and weight of the pipes will
be increased, in addition to the factors listed in COMB2, the consequence factor. This
combination is used for the dimensioning of the skid all structure conservatively.
The contingenci was applied:
Fcp = 1.10
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
9 of
26
Lifting combinations
Lifting Factors:
DAF: 1.30 (W < 100t – Offshore)
Fcog: 1.0
SKL: 1.0 (determinate lift)
Consequence: 1.35 (to check all deck members - conservatively)
TABLE: Combination Definitions

ComboName CaseName ScaleFactor
Text Text Unitless
COMB1 LOAD 1
COMB2 LOAD 1.43
COMB3 LOAD 1.93
5.6. Results (COMB2)
5.6.1. displacement
Figure 6 - Maximum vertical displacement (in)

0,13 in OK!
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
10 of
26
5.6.2. Unit check (COMB3)
Figure 7 - Unit check
5.6.3. Cable, shackle and masterlinks Tensiles
Main Information
Carga Estática
Weight of object W 6,98 mT
Weight contingency γcont 1,05

factor
•1,03 - if the weight is based on a weighed weight

•1,05 - if the weight is based on a detailed 3D model
•1,07 - if the weight is based on a very detailed MTO
•1,15 - if the weight is based on an estimated weight
ate preliminary concept phase/tender

Equipment weight Wstatic 7,329 mT

(+ contingency
factor)
Weight of rigging Wrig 0,2094 mT •For a not specified

case, use 3% of W
(weight of object)
Dynamic DAF 1,3

Amplification Factor
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
11 of
26
Special Loads Fspl 0 mT
DHL ) fspl)
Dynamic Hook Load DHL 9,80 mT
Single Point Lifts
The Dynamic Hook Load DSLsingle 9,80 mT

(DHL) is identical to
Dynamic Sling Load
(DSL)
Two Part Lifting Bridle
L1 1981,2 mm
L2 1981,2 mm
Φa 30 °
Φb 30 °
•Please note that the

formulas assume that

points A and B are
) sin # located at the same
mT elevation height.
DSLa 9,79992

$
) sin #$
mT
DSLb 9,79992
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
12 of
26
Steel Wire/Cabo sintético
1 - Safety Factor by DNV
Load Factor γf 1,3 •Shall be 1,3

•1,2 - for lifts with a well
controlled weight, and
where all skew load effects
have been thoroughly
considered
Consequence Factor γc 1,3 •Shall be 1,3
Reduction Factor due to γs 1,25 •1,00 - for metal or resin

splicing socket
•1,12 - for Flemish-eye or
Superloop
•1,25 - for ferruled
secured eye termination
•1,33 - for hand spliced
wire rope, slings and
grommets
Wear Factor γw 1,1 •1,0 - for single

application purposes
•1,1 - for multiple used
slings in good conditions
Material Factor γm 1,5 •1,35 certified new steel

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
13 of
26
wire rope slings (3rd party)

•1,50 general steel wire
rope sling
•1,65 for Polyester
•2,0 for HMPE and Aramid
•2,5 for all other fibre
material
Friction Factor γfriction 1,1 •For a not specified case,

use 1,1
Twist Factor γtw 1,1 •Shall be determined by

testing
Diameter of the bend Dbend 25,4 Mm
Diameter of the wire dwire 25,4 Mm
Minimum Breaking Load MBL 9,8 mT
Dynamic Sling Load DSL 7,6 mT •Use the DHL/DSL

calculated for the specific
case
Reduction Factor due to γb 2

bending
Nominal Safety Factor γsf 0,00
Dynamic Sling Load on DSLside 28,5156 mT

one side
Utilisation Factor UF 0 UF OK
2 - Shackles, Hooks, Masterlinks, Chain Design
SHACKLE BOW / WB ( t):
DHL/DSL DHL/DSL 9,8 mT •Use the DHL/DSL

case
Working Load Limit WLL 25 mT
Factor of Safety FOS 1,5
Utilisation Factor Criteria

1 UFcr1 0,30 UF OK
Utilisation Factor Criteria

2 UFcr2 0,78 UF OK
Utilisation Factor Criteria 3 UFcr3 0,20 UF OK

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
14 of
26
MASTERLINK ( t):
DHL/DSL DHL/DSL 9,8 mT •Use the DHL/DSL

case
5.6.4. Pad Eye

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
15 of
26
PAD EYE
PIN DIAMETER: dpin = 37.1 mm = 1.46 in

PAD EYE RADIUS: R= 63.5 mm = 2.50 in
DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLE WALL AND PIN: f= 1
HOLE DIAMETER dhole = 38.1 mm = 1.50 in
HOLE RADIUS: rhole = 19.05 mm = 0.75 in
RING RADIUS: rring = 63.5 mm = 2.50 in
PLATE THICKNESS: t plate = 25.4 mm = 1.00 in
RING THICKNESS: t ring = 0 mm = 0.00 in
TOTAL THICKNESS: T= 25.4 mm = 1.00 in
MINIMUM SIDE OF WELD FILLET: amín = 6.35 mm = 0.25 in
PLATE YIELD STRENGTH: Fy = 235 MPa
TENSILE STRENGTH OF WELDING MATERIAL: Fwu = 400 MPa
WELD ALLOWABLE STRENGTH (AT WELD): Fw = 0,3 . Fwu = 120.00 MPa
WELD ALLOWABLE STRENGTH (AT PLATE): Fw = 0,4 . Fy .√2 = 132.94
b= 304.8 mm = 12.00 in
b1 = 30.48 mm = 1.20 in
b2 = 30.48 mm = 1.20 in
b3 = 127 mm = 5.00 in
LOAD DEVIATION FACTOR: fdc = 1.35 unitless
LOAD CONTINGENCY FACTOR: fcp = 1.10 unitless
DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR: FAD = 1.30 unitless
ANGLE OF CABLE WITH THE HORIZONTAL: Θ= 90.00 degrees
DISTANCE BETWEEN CENTER OF THE HOLE TO BASE: h= 89 mm = 3.50 in
PAD EYE LOAD: F= 101.6 kN = 22.85 kip

PIN LOAD: Fpin = 196 kN = 44.11 kip
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
16 of
26
VERIFICATIONS:
1. CONTACT BETWEEN PLATE AND PIN:
Fpin / dpin.(tplate+2.tring) = 208.14 MPa < Fp = 0.9 Fy (OK)
2. SHEAR ON EFFECTIVE SECTION:
Fpin / 2.[(R-rhole).tplate+(rring-rhole).2.t ring] = 86.86 MPa < 0.4 Fy (OK)
3. TENSION ON NET SECTION:
Fpin / 2.b1.tplate+4.b2.tring = 126.67 MPa REDIMENSION
4. YIELD ON CROSS SECTION
Fpin / (b3.tplate) = 60.80 MPa < 0.6 Fy (OK)
5. PULL-OUT OF RING AND PLATE
π.rring.tplate.0,6.Fy +(2√R2-rring2).tplate.0,4.Fy = 714.46 kN > Fpin (OK)
[π.rring + 2.(R-rring)].tplate.0,6.Fy = 714.4575455 kN > Fpin (OK)

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
17 of
26
9. CHECK AT PAD EYE BASE:
2
Base Area: Abase = b . tplate = 7741.92 mm
3
Elastic Section Modulus in pad eye plane: W ipb = (tplate . b2) / 6 = 393289.54 mm
3
Elastic Section Modulus normal to pad eye plane: W opb = (b . tplate2) / 6 = 32774.13 mm
Check according AISC:
Axial Force Stress:
fa = Fa . senΘ / Abase = 25.33 MPa
Bending Stress in pad eye plane:
fipb = Fpin . cos Θ .h / W ipb = 0.00 MPa
Bending Stress normal to pad eye plane:
fopb = 0.05 . Fpin . h / Wopb = 26.63 MPa
Combined Stresses:
fa/0,6Fy + fipb/0,6Fy + fopb/0,75Fy = 0.33 < 1.00 (OK)
Shear Stress at pad eye base:
fv = Fpin . cosΘ . / (2/3) . b . tplate = 0.00 MPa < 0,4Fy (OK)

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
18 of
26
5.6.5. Wire rope
There are three types of ropes:
Type 1:
Adopted 6x19 Class wire rope Ø 1” EIPS – General use with steel core.
Breaking load = 103.4kip S.F. = 103.4/7.8 = 13 Ok!!!
Type 2:
Adopted 6x19 Class wire rope Ø 1” EIPS – General use with steel core.
Breaking load = 103.4kip S.F. = 103.4/7.8 = 13 Ok!!!

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
19 of
26
5.6.6. Spreader Bar P8”
C = 66 x cos(61.3º) x 1.35 (Fconsequence) = 42,4 kip;

A = 8.4 in2
fa = 31/ 8.4 = 3.7 ksi
kl/r = 4
Fa = 21.44 ksi > 3.7 Ok!!!
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
20 of
26
5.6.7. Pad eye on top of Spreader Bar
F=47.8/(1.1x1.3) = 33.4 kip

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
21 of
26
PAD EYE
PIN DIAMETER: dpin = 52 mm = 2.05 in

HOLE DIAMETER dhole = 54 mm = 2.13 in
HOLE RADIUS: rhole = 27 mm = 1.06 in
PLATE THICKNESS: t plate = 38.1 mm = 1.50 in
RING THICKNESS: t ring = 12.7 mm = 0.50 in
b= 265 mm = 10.43 in
b1 = 43.2 mm = 1.70 in
b2 = 36.5 mm = 1.44 in
b3 = 158.75 mm = 6.25 in

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
22 of
26
VERIFICATIONS:
Fpin / dpin.(tplate+2.t ring) = 86.88 MPa < Fp = 0.9 Fy (OK)
Fpin / 2.[(R-rhole).t plate+(rring-rhole).2.t ring] = 49.08 MPa < 0.4 Fy (OK)
Fpin / 2.b1.t plate+4.b2.t ring = 55.75 MPa < 0.45 Fy (OK)
Fpin / (b3.t plate) = 47.43 MPa < 0.6 Fy (OK)
π.rring.t plate.0,6.Fy +(2√R2-rring2).t plate.0,4.Fy = 1412.81 kN > Fpin (OK)
[π.rring + 2.(R-rring)].t plate.0,6.Fy = 1242.250493 kN > Fpin (OK)
6. RING LOAD:
Fring = Fpin.[tring / (tplate + 2.tring)] = 57.37 kN
7. RING WELD THROAT OF FILLET:
gweld = Fring / ( π.rring.Fw) = 2.40 mm
8. RING WELD FILLET SIDE:
aweld = √2 . gweld = 3.39 mm Use Fillet weld: 6.35 mm

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
23 of
26
9. CHECK AT PAD EYE BASE:
2
Base Area: Abase = b . tplate = 10096.5 mm
3
Elastic Section Modulus in pad eye plane: W ipb = (tplate . b2) / 6 = 445928.75 mm
3
Elastic Section Modulus normal to pad eye plane: W opb = (b . tplate2) / 6 = 64112.78 mm
Check according AISC:
Axial Force Stress:
fa = Fa . senΘ / Abase = 28.41 MPa
Bending Stress in pad eye plane:
fipb = Fpin . cosΘ .h / W ipb = 0.00 MPa
Bending Stress normal to pad eye plane:
fopb = 0.05 . Fpin . h / Wopb = 18.12 MPa
Combined Stresses:
fa/0,6Fy + fipb/0,6Fy + fopb/0,75Fy = 0.30 < 1.00 (OK)
Shear Stress at pad eye base:
fv = Fpin . cosΘ . / (2/3) . b . tplate = 0.00 MPa < 0,4Fy (OK)

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
24 of
26
5.6.8. Plate of pad eye on botton of Spreader Bar
DELTAPLATE:
DHL/DSL DHL/DSL 9,8 mT •Use the

DHL/DSL
calculate
d for the
specific
case
F =28,5 kip
Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
25 of
26
PAD EYE
PIN DIAMETER: dpin = 37.1 mm = 1.46 in

HOLE DIAMETER dhole = 38.1 mm = 1.50 in
HOLE RADIUS: rhole = 19.05 mm = 0.75 in
PLATE THICKNESS: tplate = 25.4 mm = 1.00 in
RING THICKNESS: tring = 9.525 mm = 0.38 in
b= 101.4 mm = 3.99 in
b1 = 30.48 mm = 1.20 in
b2 = 30.48 mm = 1.20 in
b3 = 127 mm = 5.00 in

Nº: REV.
CALCULATION SHEET 0
SHEET
26 of
26
VERIFICATIONS:
Fpin / dpin.(t plate+2.tring) = 119.76 MPa < Fp = 0.9 Fy (OK)
Fpin / 2.[(R-rhole).t plate+(rring-rhole).2.tring] = 56.46 MPa < 0.4 Fy (OK)
Fpin / 2.b1.tplate+4.b2.t ring = 72.88 MPa < 0.45 Fy (OK)
Fpin / (b3.tplate) = 61.22 MPa < 0.6 Fy (OK)
π.rring.tplate.0,6.Fy +(2√R2-rring2).t plate.0,4.Fy = 757.27 kN > Fpin (OK)
[π.rring + 2.(R-rring)].tplate.0,6.Fy = 665.7788432 kN > Fpin (OK)
6. RING LOAD:
Fring = Fpin.[tring / (tplate + 2.tring)] = 42.32 kN
7. RING WELD THROAT OF FILLET:
gweld = Fring / ( π.rring.Fw) = 2.18 mm
8. RING WELD FILLET SIDE:
aweld = √2 . gweld = 3.08 mm Use Fillet weld: 6.35 mm

Calculation Sheet H304

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Calculation Sheet H304

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DOCTYPE DOC Nº:

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: COMPANY NAME:

REV. DESCRIPTION AND/OR REVISED SHEETS

0 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION

REV. 0 REV.1 REV.2 REV.3 REV.4 REV.5 REV.6 REV.7 REV.8

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

2. CODES AND STANDARDS

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

5. SKID FOR DANIEL ULTRASONIC METER

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

5.1. Materials properties

Figure 2 – ASTM A992 Gr. 50

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

5.3. Loading plan

5.3.1. Self deadweight (DEAD)

5.3.2. Piping Load (LOAD)

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

Figure 4 – Datasheet informations

Figure 5 – Applied load (lbf)

5.4. LIFTING boundary conditions

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

5.5. ANALYSIS COMBINATONS

Three combinations will be made:

The contingenci was applied:

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

TABLE: Combination Definitions

5.6. Results (COMB2)

Figure 6 - Maximum vertical displacement (in)

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

5.6.2. Unit check (COMB3)

Figure 7 - Unit check

5.6.3. Cable, shackle and masterlinks Tensiles

Weight contingency γcont 1,05

•1,03 - if the weight is based on a weighed weight

Equipment weight Wstatic 7,329 mT

Weight of rigging Wrig 0,2094 mT •For a not specified

Dynamic DAF 1,3

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

Special Loads Fspl 0 mT

DHL      ) fspl)

Dynamic Hook Load DHL 9,80 mT

Single Point Lifts

The Dynamic Hook Load DSLsingle 9,80 mT

Two Part Lifting Bridle

•Please note that the

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

Steel Wire/Cabo sintético

1 - Safety Factor by DNV

Load Factor γf 1,3 •Shall be 1,3

Consequence Factor γc 1,3 •Shall be 1,3

Reduction Factor due to γs 1,25 •1,00 - for metal or resin

Wear Factor γw 1,1 •1,0 - for single

Material Factor γm 1,5 •1,35 certified new steel

STEEL STRUCTURE – DANIEL ULTRASONIC SKID

wire rope slings (3rd party)

Friction Factor γfriction 1,1 •For a not specified case,

Twist Factor γtw 1,1 •Shall be determined by

Diameter of the bend Dbend 25,4 Mm

Diameter of the wire dwire 25,4 Mm

Minimum Breaking Load MBL 9,8 mT

Dynamic Sling Load DSL 7,6 mT •Use the DHL/DSL

Reduction Factor due to γb 2

DHL ) fspl)