CARC Order 18-9015

CARC Airworthiness Inspector’s Handbook CARC Order 18-9015
0.2 Table of Contents
Subject
Part 0 General
0.1 Forward
0.2 Table of Contents
0.3 List of effective pages
0.4 Amendment Record
0.4.1 Reason for revisions
0.4.2 Document Control
0.4.3 Amendment Record Status
0.5 Distribution list
0.6 References
0.7 Abbreviations, terminology and definitions
0.8 Fees and charges
Part 1 Organization and Management
1.1 CARC
1.2 Safety Oversight Directorates
1.3 Airworthiness Standards Directorate
1.3.1 Aircraft and CAMO Division
1.3.2 Role of the Aircraft & CAMO Division
1.3.3 AMO and MTO Division
1.3.4 Role of the AMO & MTO Division
1.3.5 Reserved
1.3.6 Reserved
1.3.7 Management Personnel of Airworthiness
1.3.8 Duties and Responsibilities
1.3.8.1 Director Airworthiness Standards
1.3.8.2 Chief Division; Aircraft and CAMO
1.3.8.3 Chief Division; AMO and MTO
1.3.8.4 Airworthiness Inspector
1.4 Organization Chart
1.5 Airworthiness Safety Oversight Personnel Qualification and
Training
1.6 Aviation Safety Inspector's Credential
1.7 Safety Oversight Annual Plan
Part 2 Administration
2.1 Technical Library
2.2 Record Keeping
2.3 Filing System
2.4 Document Control
Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-2 of 12

Part 3 Registration of Aircraft

3.1 Scope of procedure
3.2 Organization and Responsibilities
3.3 Application Phase
3.4 Investigation Phase
3.5 Issuance of the Certificate of Registration
3.6 Duration and Continued Validity
3.7 Suspension and Revocation
3.8 Records
3.9 Exemptions
Part 4 Certificate of Airworthiness
4.1 Scope of Procedure
4.5 Issuance of the Certificate of Airworthiness
4.7 Renewals and Continued Oversight
4.8 Suspension and Revocation of Airworthiness Certificates
4.9 Record Keeping
4.10 Exemptions
Part 5 Maintenance Organization Approval
5.2 Organizational Structure and Responsibilities
5.3 Acceptance of application
5.4 Investigation of Initial Approval
5.4.1 Phase I Pre-Application
5.4.2 Phase II Formal Application
5.4.3 Phase III Detailed Review of Documentation
5.4.4 Phase IV Audit of the organization
5.4.5 Review of findings
5.4.6 Phase V Issue of Certificate
5.5 Continued Surveillance
5.6 Findings
5.7 Changes
5.8 MOE Amendments
5.9 Revocation, suspension and limitation of approval
5.10 Records
5.11 Exemptions
5.12 Safety Management System
5.13 Foreign Part 145 Acceptance
5.14 Technical Occurrence Reporting
Part 6 Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization Approval
6.3 Initial application/enquiry
6.4 Investigation of Initial Acceptance
6.4.1 Phase I Pre Application
6.4.4 Phase IV Audit of the Organization

6.4.5 CARC Review of Findings

6.4.6 Phase V Issue of Approval
6.5 Continued Oversight and renewal of approvals
6.6 Changes
6.7 CAME Amendments
6.8 Revocation, Suspension and Limitation of Approval
6.9 Records
6.10 Exemptions
6.11 Special Operations Approvals
Part 7 Maintenance Training Organization (MTO) – JCAR Part 147
Subpart A
7.1 Scope
7.2 Authority Designation
7.3 Record Keeping
7.4 Exemptions
Subpart B
7.5 Scope
7.6 Procedure for approval and change to the approval
7.6.1 General
7.6.2 Authority
7.6.3 Initial Issue of a Part -147 Approval
7.6.4 Pre-Application Meeting
7.6.5 Application & Application Meeting
7.6.6 Submission of Required Manual(s)/Documentation
7.6.7 Management personnel qualification – review
7.6.8 Manual(s)/Documentation Review
7.6.8.1 Part-147 Conformance Document
7.6.8.2 Organization’s MTOE
7.6.9 Corrective Actions
7.6.10 On-Site Inspection(s)
7.6.10.1 Opening Meeting
7.6.10.2 On-Site Audit
7.6.11 Inspection Results & Closing of Findings
7.6.11.1 Team Report
7.6.11.2 Closing Meeting
7.6.11.3 Assemble CARC Certification File
7.6.12 Audit Follow-up (if Applicable)
7.6.13 Preparation for Issue of the Approval (Part-147)
7.6.14 Quality Check
7.7 Issue of the approval
7.7.1 CARC Certification File
7.7.2 Variation of –Part-147 Approval
7.7.3 Update AWSD Database
7.8 Continued validity procedures
7.9 Findings
7.10 Reporting Audit Findings
7.10.1 General
7.10.2 Procedure
Subpart C
7.11 Revocation, Suspension and Limitation of the MTO Approval
Subpart D

7.12 Training In-Progress Inspection

Subpart E
Type Rating Training Course Approval other than those conducted
by a Part-147 Approved Maintenance Training Organization
7.13 Scope
7.14 Application
7.15 Training Provisions and Environment
7.16 Course Syllabus
7.17 Theoretical Knowledge Examinations
7.18 Practical Training
7.19 Practical Assessment
7.20 Conduct of Course
7.21 Organization Quality Integration
7.22 Course Record
7.23 Course Certificates
7.24 Approval
Subpart F
Foreign Part 147 Acceptance/Type Training
Part 8 Permit to Fly
8.1 Scope of the Procedure
8.2 Application for a Permit to Fly
8.3 Review and assessment
8.4 Approval of Flight Conditions/Restrictions and issuance of a Permit
to Fly
8.5 Coordination process with CARC Air Clearances concerning
issuance of a landing/or over flight permit to a foreign registered aircraft
with a Permit to Fly issued by that State
8.6 Information to be entered into CARC Form 18-0311 “Application
for Issuance of Permit to Fly and Approval of Flight Conditions
8.7 Information to be entered into CARC Form 18-0310 (Approval of
Flight Conditions for a Permit to Fly)
Part 9. Personnel Licensing (Certifying Staff)
Subpart A
9.1 General
9.2 Protected Rights
9.3 CARC
9.4 General Responsibilities of an Authorized Maintenance Licensing
Inspectors
9.5 Authorized Maintenance Licensing Inspectors Training Program
9.6 Training File
9.7 Official Credential Card
9.8 Access to Personnel Files and Computer Records
9.9 AWSD Equipment and Tools
9.10 Test Appeals and Complains
9.11 Record Keeping
9.12 Mutual Exchange of Information
9.13 Exemptions
Subpart B
9.14 Issue of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence
9.15 Scope
9.16 Application and Processing
9.17 Procedure for the Issue of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence by

CARC
9.18 Procedure for the Issue of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence via
Maintenance Organization Approved in accordance with Part-145
9.19 Procedure for the Change of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence to
include an Additional Basic Category or Subcategory
9.20 Procedure for the Change of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence to
include an Aircraft Rating or to Remove Limitations
9.21 Procedure for the Renewal of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence
Validity
9.22 Procedure for the Conversion of Licences including Group Ratings
9.23 Procedures for the Direct Approval of Aircraft Type Training
Subpart C
Examinations
9.24 General
9.25 Examination Standard
9.26 Application for Written Examination
9.27 Processing the Application
Subpart D
Conversion of Certifying Staff Qualifications
9.28 Scope
9.29 Conversion Report for National Qualifications
9.30 Conversion Report for Approved Maintenance Organization
Authorizations
Subpart E
Examination Credits
9.31 Scope
9.32 Examination Credit Validity
Subpart F
Continuing Oversight
9.33 Scope
9.34 Revocation, Suspension or Limitation of the Aircraft Maintenance
Licence
Subpart G
Validation of aircraft maintenance licenses in accordance with
ICAO Annex 1
9.35 Scope
9.36 Eligibility Requirements
9.37 Inspector’s Responsibility
Subpart H
Personnel Certification in Accordance with Part-65
9.38 Scope
Section A Mechanic Certification
9.39 Scope
9.40 Mechanic Eligibility
9.41 Mechanic Experience
9.42 Proof of Identity
9.43 Examination Standards
9.44 Re-Testing After Failure
9.45 The Mechanic Test(s)
9.46 Application for Basic Examination/Practical Tests
9.47 Practical Tests
9.48 Certificate Issuance

9.49 Certificate Renewal

Section B Inspection Authorization (IA)– Original Issuance
9.50 Scope
9.51 IA Eligibility Requirements
9.52 Persons Approved to Conduct the Test
9.53 Procedures When Applicant Fails To Meet The Qualification
9.54 The Test
9.55 Conducting and Grading the Test
9.56 Issuance Of Inspection Authorization
9.57 Record Keeping and Related Reports
9.58 Renewal or Surrender
9.59 Failure to Renew
Section C Repairman Certification
9.60 Scope
9.61 Application Procedures
9.62 Application Review
9.64 Application Disapproval
9.65 Surrender Certificate Procedures
Part 10 Certification of products, parts and appliances
10.1 General
10.2 Certification Team
10.3 Type certification and supplemental type certification
10.3.1 Pre-TC phase and CRI’s
10.3.1.1 Phase I: Technical Familiarization and Initial
Type Certification Basis
10.3.1.2 Phase II: Certification program
10.3.1.3 Phase III: Compliance determination
10.3.1.4 Phase IV: Final report and issue TC
10.3.1.4.1 Statement of compliance
10.3.1.4.2 Final Report
10.3.1.4.3 Issue of Type Certificate
10.3.1.4.4 Approval of Non-Jordanian Products
10.3.2 Post TC phase
10.3.2.1 Classification of changes
10.3.2.2 Approval of TC and STC design changes
10.3.2.3 Continued Airworthiness, Service Bulletins and
AD’s
10.3.2.4 Repairs
10.4 JTSO Authorization
10.4.1 General
10.4.2 Application
10.4.3 Investigation process
10.4.4 Issue of JTSO Authorization
10.4.5 Post JTSO Authorization
10.4.5.1 Design changes
10.4.5.2 Continued airworthiness actions and AD’s
10.4.5.3 Service bulletins
10.4.5.4 Repairs
10.5 Interface with other activities and organizations
10.5.1 DOA and POA
10.5.2 Aircraft/engine/propeller interactions

10.5.3 Operations
10.5.4 Maintenance
10.6 Issuance of a Type Certificate
10.6.1 Legal framework
10.6.2 Issuance process
10.6.3 Responsibilities
10.7 Issuance of Certificate of Airworthiness
10.8 Suspension, revocation and transfer of (S)TC and JTSO
authorization
Part 11 Design Organization Approval
11.1 Scope of the procedure
11.2 Organizational structure and responsibilities
11.3 Acceptance of Application
11.4 Investigation for Initial Approval
11.4.1 Phase I Initiation
11.4.2 Phase II Preparatory phase
11.4.3 Phase III Presentation to the applicant of the investigation
program
11.4.4 Phase IV Investigation activities
11.4.5 Phase V Conclusion
11.5 Issuance of the Design Organization Approval Certificate
11.6 Changes to the Approval
11.8 Non Compliance Findings Level 1 and 2
11.9 Limitation, suspension and revocation of the DOA
Part 12 Production Organization Approval
12.2 Organizational structure and capabilities
12.4.3 Phase III Presentation to the applicant of the investigation
program
12.5 Issuance of the Production Organization Approval certificate ……..
12.8 Non-compliance findings level 1 and 2
12.9 Limitation, suspension and revocation of the POA
Part 13 Airworthiness Procedures, for the approval of leases among
commercial air transport operators
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Purpose
13.3 Applicability
13.4 Terminology
13.5 Airworthiness Procedure
13.6 Coordination with Flight Operations Standards Department
13.7 Form Completion Instructions
Part 14 Forms
14.1 Forms

14.2 Use of Forms

Annex 1 CRI Procedure
Annex 2 TCDS Example
Annex 3 (Reserved)
Annex 4 TC/STC Application and Certification Process

0.3 List of Effective Pages
Page Issue Rev Date

Part 0
0-1 to 0-12 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 1
1-1 to 1-7 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 2
2-1 to 2-1 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 3
3-1 to 3-5 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 4
4-1 to 4-6 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 5
5-1 to 5-10 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 6
6-1 to 6-13 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 7
7-1 to 7-17 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 8
8-1 to 8-5 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 9
9-1 to 9-21 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 10
10-1 to 10-9 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 11
11-1 to 11-6 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 12
12-1 to 12-7 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 13
13-1 to 13-2 06 00 Aug. 2016
Part 14
14-1 to 14-1 06 00 Aug. 2016
Annexes (1, 2, 3 & 4)
A-1 to A-14 06 00 Aug. 2016

0.4 Amendment Record
0.4.1 Reasons for revisions

Revisions to this airworthiness handbook can arise for a number of reasons and all staff are
encouraged to submit proposals for revision based on user experience or where they believe
improvements can be made. In addition, revisions will be required as a result of changes to the
regulations or the administrative or technical procedures with AWSD.
0.4.2 Document control

This handbook is a controlled document under the administrative responsibility of the Director
Airworthiness Standards.
Revisions can only be made effective after the review of the Director Airworthiness Standards and
approval of the CEO/Chief Commissioner.
Each page of the handbook has an issue no, revision no, and date of issue and the status of these
pages is identified on the List of Effective Pages. In addition an amendment record page is included
at section 0.4.3 to show the current amendment record.
The Holders of this Order are listed in the Distribution List at paragraph 0.5, this order shall always
be kept up-to-date by the Assigned Chief, and it shall be available to them in a softcopy at the
Airworthiness Server Computer, in addition to the hard copy at the Technical Library.
0.4.3 Amendment Record Status
Issue No. Revision No. Date

01 00 1986
02 00 Aug. 2006
03 00 July 2012
03 01 Mar. 2013
04 00 Aug. 2013
05 00 Dec. 2015
06 00 Aug. 2016

0.5 Distribution list
No. Manual Holder

1 Chief Commissioner
2 Commissioner for Safety and Security
3 Director Airworthiness Standards
4 Director Quality and Internal Auditing
5 Chief Airworthiness Inspection
6 Chief Airworthiness Engineering
7 Chief Maintenance Training Organizations
8 Airworthiness Inspectors Staff
0.6 References
0.6.1 Civil Aviation Law No. 41 of 2007, as amended.

0.6.2 Jordanian Civil Aviation Regulations.
0.7 Abbreviations, terminology and definitions
Abbreviations
AD Airworthiness Directive
AMC Acceptable Means of Compliance
AMO Approved Maintenance Organization
AWSD Airworthiness Standards Department
CAMO Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization
CARC Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission
DA Director Airworthiness Standards
GM Guidance Material
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization
JCAR Jordan Civil Aviation Regulation
MTO Maintenance Training Organization
TC Type Certificate
TCDS Type Certificate Data Sheet
0.8 Fees and charges
The fees applicable to the various functions provided by CARC are prescribed in Regulation No. 45
of the year 2007, as amended, which is published on CARC website.
This regulation was amended in Regulation No. 106 of the year 2014, which was issued on 12th of
November 2014, and it was effective on 16th of March 2015. This regulation is read together with
Regulation No. 45 of the year 2007.

Part 1
Organization and Management
1.1 Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission (CARC)
Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission is the legal entity for all regulatory matters relating to the
civil aviation as prescribed in Article 7 of the Civil Aviation Law No. 41 of 2007.
1.2 Safety Oversight Directorates
The Organization Manual 4-1001 mandates the Safety Oversight Directorates and Divisions of
CARC, including the Airworthiness Standards Directorate (AWSD) and its Divisions.
1.3 Airworthiness Standards Directorate (AWSD)
AWSD consists of the following Divisions:
- Aircraft and CAMO (Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations),

- AMO and MTO (Approved Maintenance Organizations and Maintenance Training
Organizations).
These divisions are supported by the administrative staff, who provides the following services:
- Office administration,
- Airworthiness system administration.
- Technical library & records filing.
1.3.1 Aircraft and CAMO Division
This division is part of the AWSD and is staffed, organized and managed in order to satisfy all
regulatory responsibilities relating to JCAR Part 47, Part M and Part 21 (Applicable Subparts)
activities.
1.3.2 Role of the Aircraft and CAMO division
The tasks and responsibilities assigned to the Aircraft and CAMO division are:
1. Record, review and process applications for registration of aircraft, and issuing Certificates
of Registration,
2. Record, review and process applications for de-registration of aircraft, and issuing
Certificates of De-Registration,
3. Survey aircraft for issuance, renewal and validation of Certificates of Airworthiness and the
subsequent execution of such documents,
4. Survey and evaluate aircraft for issuance of an Export Certificate of Airworthiness for
export to another State,
5. Record, review and process the application for operational directives with a continuing
impact including approvals in the area of airworthiness of special approvals including
ETOPS, RVSM, CAT II/III, RNP, …etc.
6. Coordinate the process of approvals in the area of airworthiness of special approvals with
CARC/FOSD for subsequent processing and issuance of Approvals /OPS SPECS as
appropriate,
7. Issue noise certificates for aircraft on the registry.

8. Issue Special Flight Permits for aircraft that do not meet applicable airworthiness
requirements, but are capable of safe flight,
9. Issue and oversee Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations Approvals,
10. Review aircraft and component manufacturers’ service bulletins and airworthiness directives
issued by the airworthiness authorities to determine their applicability to aircraft of JY-
registry, and direct corrective action where airworthiness may be affected,
11. Approve Maintenance programs, reliability programs, technical logs, MEL etc,
12. Accept data for changes and repairs,
13. Approve modifications and repairs,
14. Assess and approve the nominated post holders for organizations to perform certain
maintenance or airworthiness functions, and monitor the activities of those persons,
15. Prepare and distribute to the public, documents containing all issued airworthiness
directives,
16. Accept imported aircraft, related products, parts and appliances,
17. Issue Type Acceptance Certificates for imported aircraft.
1.3.3 AMO and MTO Division
This division is part of the AWSD and is staffed, organized and managed in order to satisfy all
regulatory responsibilities relating to JCAR Part 145, Part 66 and Part 147.
1.3.4 Role of the AMO and MTO division
The tasks and responsibilities assigned to the AMO and MTO division are:
1. Approve all Aircraft Maintenance Organizations (AMO) located in Jordan or outside which
maintain aircraft registered in Jordan in accordance with JCAR Part 145.
2. Conduct periodical surveillance and audits on all Aircraft Maintenance Organizations
approved by CARC.
3. Survey the facilities, procedures and staffing of applicants seeking approval to conduct
maintenance on aircraft, and the issuance and renewal of such approval,
4. Assess and approve the nominated post holders for organizations to perform certain
maintenance or airworthiness functions, and monitor the activities of those persons,
5. Prepare and distribute guidance material to the aviation industry concerning maintenance
practices and procedures, where such advice does not warrant mandatory action but may still
make a significant contribution to flight safety,
6. Evaluate results of CARC surveillance activity concerning Maintenance Training
Organizations and initiate appropriate action to assure compliance with Jordanian Civil
Aviation law and Civil Aviation Regulations,
7. Continually monitor changes to aviation activities and make recommendations to the
Director concerning airworthiness staffing, training, and required equipment,
8. Approval of training courses out of 147 maintenance training organization.
9. Technical Assessment and recommendation of an applicant’s qualifications to hold a license
or rating.
10. Technical Assessment and recommendation to issue and endorse licenses and ratings.
11. Approval and oversight of Approved Maintenance Training Organizations
12. Technical Assessment and recommendation to issue validation of licenses issued by other
Contracting States.

1.3.5 Reserved.
1.3.6 Reserved.
1.3.7 Management Personnel of Airworthiness
The following management personnel are employed within the AWSD:
- Director Airworthiness Standards,

- Chief Aircraft and CAMO Division, and
- Chief AMO and MTO Division.
1.3.8 Duties and Responsibilities
The main functions of AWSD are defined in the Organization Manual 4-1001, and detailed in this
Handbook.
1.3.8.1 Director Airworthiness Standards
The Director Airworthiness Standard is responsible for the following functions:
1. Evaluate Civil Aviation Regulations in respect of Airworthiness matters and to make

recommendations to the Chief Commissioner concerning desired changes.
2. Establish standards and develop programs for the certification of aircraft, continuing
airworthiness of aircraft, approval of organizations and personnel.
3. Ensure effective management of the divisions of Airworthiness Standards Directorate.
4. Assure compliance with JCARs through surveillance, inspection, and enforcement
procedures.
5. Evaluate all applications for air operator certificate, CAMO, MO, PO, DO and MTO and
make recommendations to the Chief Commissioner of CARC.
6. Approve original or amended certificates and the associated privileges and schedules issued
for the approved organizations.
7. Approve and issue all CARC Publications associated with AWSD.
8. Coordinate activity with other CARC Directorates in accordance with Chief
Commissioner’s orders and guidelines.
9. Evaluate all applications for aircraft registration and airworthiness certification and make
recommendations to the Chief Commissioner of CARC.
10. Evaluate all applications for airmen certification and make recommendations to the Chief
Commissioner of CARC.
11. Formulate and implement accident prevention actions and programs.
12. Coordinate activities with other CARC units in areas that involve more than one Directorate.

1.3.8.2 Chief Division; Aircraft and CAMO
The Chief Aircraft and CAMO Division is responsible for the following functions:
1. Undertaking responsibilities and management of tasks associated with this division and
listed under paragraph 1.3.2 of this handbook,
Director concerning airworthiness staffing, training, and required equipment,
3. Monitor reports of non-compliance with JCARs and make recommendations to the Director
Airworthiness Standards,
4. Review and make recommendations concerning suggestions which are submitted by
personnel in the airworthiness organizations,
5. Review all complaints concerning activity of the division, take action to rectify problems
and advise the Director Airworthiness Standards of all action taken,
6. Resolution of disagreements within the division,
7. Perform other airworthiness tasks assigned by the Director Airworthiness Standards or
higher CARC Management.
1.3.8.3 Chief Division; AMO and MTO
The Chief AMO and MTO Division is responsible for the following functions:
1. Undertaking responsibilities and management of tasks associated with this division and
listed under paragraph 1.3.4 of this handbook,
Director Airworthiness Standards concerning airworthiness staffing, training, and required
equipment,
3. Monitor reports of non-compliance with JCARs and make recommendations to the Director
Airworthiness Standards,
4. Review and make recommendations concerning suggestions which are submitted by
personnel in the airworthiness organizations,
5. Review all complaints concerning activity of the division. Take action to rectify problems
and advise the Director Airworthiness Standards of all action taken,
6. Resolution of disagreements within the division,
7. Perform other airworthiness tasks assigned by the Director Airworthiness Standards or
higher CARC Management.
1.3.8.4 Airworthiness Inspector
The duties of the Airworthiness Inspector are as follows:
1. Conduct inspections and carry out surveillance functions in accordance with the AWSD
continuing surveillance plans,
2. Prepare detailed reports on inspections and surveillance activities,
3. Promote compliance with airworthiness regulations and directives,
4. Report breaches of regulations and directives to the appropriate authority within the AWSD,
5. Report defects noted to aircraft operators/owners and approved airworthiness organizations
for remedial action,
6. Conduct, in co-operation with members of the CARC Operations Directorate, operator
certification inspections as required;
7. Evaluate air carrier and maintenance organizations for compliance with JCARs during initial
certification and make recommendations to the Chief Division.

8. Perform physical inspections of facilities, manuals, equipment, and technical data of air
carriers or maintenance organizations seeking new certificates or added ratings and make
recommendations through CARC/AWSD reporting procedure.
9. Evaluate Continuing Airworthiness Management and Maintenance Organization,
Maintenance Training Organizations Approvals for compliance with the respective JCARs
during initial certification and ongoing surveillance and make recommendations to the Chief
Division.
10. Perform physical inspections of aircraft, components, equipment, and aircraft records and
make recommendations to the Chief Division concerning issuance and renewal of
certificates of airworthiness,
11. Undertaking liaison with other inspectors regarding recommendations in respect of issue and
renewal of Certificates of Airworthiness,
12. Conduct routine surveillance of work being performed in the hangars, workshops and repair
facilities of approved maintenance organizations,
13. Evaluate proposed contract maintenance facilities, including organization, personnel,
equipment, training, and records and make recommendations concerning authority to
perform tasks on Jordanian civil registered aircraft,
14. Evaluate proposed AMO’s maintenance manuals or amendments compliance with JCARs
and make recommendations concerning approval,
15. Monitoring the implementation of the airworthiness regulations instructions/directives
issued by the AWSD;
16. Evaluating the content of all Airworthiness Directives, Service bulletins and similar
documents in respect of the aircraft (including powerplants) and equipment and monitoring
the extent of implementation;
17. Reviewing maintenance manuals, making recommendations in respect of amendments
which may be required by the AWSD prior to approval of the manual;
18. Review and make recommendations regarding Maintenance programs, reliability programs,
technical logs, MEL etc,
19. Review and make recommendations regarding issuance of original maintenance scope of
approval or proposed amendments to existing maintenance scope of approval.
20. Monitoring certificated operator maintenance training programs,
21. Determine whether applicants for mechanic or repairman certificates meet CAR
requirements for certification and make recommendations. When assigned the task conduct
oral and practical examinations,
22. Conduct inspections of operator's route station facilities,
23. Participating in aircraft accident or incident investigations, help to identify causal factors,
help establish recommended corrective actions, and help compile required reports, when
requested by the Director Airworthiness Standards, Investigator In-charge or Chief
Commissioner,
24. Ensuring all correspondence, reports, audits etc, including electronic data in the form of e-
mails or attachments, on companies for which they are responsible, are maintained during
the course of initial investigation, continued surveillance etc;
25. Ensuring the accuracy and completeness of all documentation relevant to their duties;
26. Compiling all documentation and submitting to the filing officer on completion of each task
or function,
27. Maintaining and updating the AWSD computerized system on the areas for which they are
responsible on an ongoing basis,
28. Perform other Airworthiness tasks assigned by the Director Airworthiness Standards or
Chief Division.

1.4 Organization Chart
In accordance with the Organization Manual 4-1001, in which the organization chart of AWSD is
defined, the AWSD organization chart is detailed in this Handbook as illustrated in Figure 1-1.
The Directorate consists of two divisions responsible for JCAR Parts:
1. Part 21, Part 47 and Part M, and

2. Part 145, Part 66 and Part 147
The Directorate is supported by the administration staff:
1. Secretary
2. Airworthiness Administrator
3. Library/Records Officer
Director Airworthiness Standards

.
Airworthiness Administrator Secretary
Library/Records Officer
Chief Aircraft, Chief AMO

and CAMO and MTO
Airworthiness Standards Inspectors Airworthiness Standards Inspectors

(4) (4)
Figure 1-1, AWSD Organizational Chart

1.5 Airworthiness Safety Oversight Personnel Qualification and Training
All airworthiness safety oversight personnel within the Airworthiness Standards Directorate must
be adequately qualified and properly trained to perform the intended job functions.
The qualification requirements are detailed in CARC Organization Manual 4-1001.
The training requirements and procedure are detailed in CARC Manual 4-2001 “CARC Training
Manual for Safety and Security Oversight Personnel”. The OJT main subjects are defined in the
CARC Manual 4-2001 and detailed in CARC Form 18-0331, as amended.
Each inspector shall ensure that an updated Curriculum Vitae and a copy of his training certificate
are submitted to the Training Division to update his own personal file.
1.6 Aviation Safety Inspector's Credential
(a) Criteria for Eligibility. Airworthiness inspectors currently assigned a position with safety
oversight responsibilities for Jordanian Civil Aviation Regulations (JCAR) under airworthiness
responsibility; e.g Part 21, Part 47, Part 66, Part 145, Part 147, Part M and Part CS.
(b) Issuance and Control of Credential. The CARC credential will be issued to qualified
Airworthiness inspectors by the CEO/Chief Commissioner in accordance with CARC CEO Order
1-2016 “Issuance and Control of Inspectors Credentials”.
(c) The Credential Card will clearly indicate the specific authorities that the holder is allowed to
exercise. When staff are performing inspections or audits, they must carry their credential cards
with them. When an employee leaves the employ of CARC or changes position within CARC, the
card must be cancelled or replaced as appropriate to the new job functions.
1.7 Safety Oversight Annual Plan
The Safety Oversight Annual Plan is produced in December of the preceding year and accounts for
all surveillance audits/inspections for the new year in accordance with Guidance and Administrative
Material 18-2511 “Establishment of an Annual Surveillance Program For Airworthiness”, as
amended.

Part 2
Administration
2.1 Technical Library
A Technical Library function is to make available the publications issued by AWSD, such as
Orders, Guidance Procedures, and Working Arrangements, etc. In addition, copies of organizations’
manuals, technical publications issued by manufacturers. Employees of the Airworthiness Standards
Department are required to continually familiarize themselves with these publications including any
updates or amendments as required in order to fulfill their responsibilities within the organization.
2.2 Record Keeping
A record-keeping system shall ensure that all records are accessible whenever needed within a
reasonable period of time.
These records are organized in a consistent way throughout the Airworthiness Standards
Department/Documentation Centre and details of the filing system are described in 2.3.
All records containing sensitive data regarding applicants or organizations are stored in a secure
manner with controlled access to ensure confidentiality of this kind of data.
All computer hardware used to ensure data backup is stored in a different location from that
containing the working data in an environment that ensures they remain in good condition.
When hardware or software changes take place special care is taken to ensure that all necessary data
continues to be accessible for the required minimum periods.
2.3 Filing System
The filing system is based on Field and Organization classifications in which the correspondence
and file designation is done according to instructions prescribed in File Guide CARC Order 18-
1010, which can be accessed by AWSD personnel at the Technical Library; in addition a soft copy
of the Order shall be available to each airworthiness inspector.
2.4 Document Control
All documents used by inspectors shall be issued and controlled through CARC’s formalized
Document Control Procedure (25 QP-02) in order to ensure its currency.

Part 3
Registration of Aircraft
The proper registration of aircraft is fundamental to the safety of international air operations and
compliance must therefore be established with the applicable regulations.
In accordance with Annex 7 to the Chicago Convention, an aircraft possess the nationality of the
State in which it is registered, therefore States must maintain a registry of aircraft where aircraft
with their nationality are registered with appropriate details. An aircraft cannot be legally registered
in more than one State, but its registration may be changed from one State to another.
Jordan Civil Aviation Law no. 41 of 2007; Articles 37, 38, 39, 52 and 53, and JCAR Part 47
prescribe the requirements for aircraft registration. CARC, among its responsibility in respect of
each aircraft on its Register, has a fundamental responsibility to ensure that the aircraft is operated
in an airworthy condition
This procedure, in respect of aircraft on the Jordanian civil register, describes how CARC will
handle application for Certificate of Registration (CofR), the continued surveillance and validity of
Certificates of Registration (CARC Form 18-0234), De-registration (CARC Form 18-0238) and
issuance of Export Certificate of Airworthiness (CARC Form 18-0231).
The ongoing control and supervision of the civil aircraft register is performed in accordance with
the provisions of JCAR Part 47. Airworthiness Standards is the responsible directorate for
controlling and maintaining the register. The certificate of registration issuance process is
documented in CARC Form 18-0208-1.
The purpose of this procedure is to provide clear guidelines and instructions for registration of
aircraft on the Jordanian Civil Aircraft register and to ensure that the regulatory requirements are
complied with.
The Director Airworthiness Standards has overall responsibility for the administration and control
of the aircraft on the register. He is assisted in this task by the Chief Division. The day to day
supervision and control of the registration and de-registration process is assigned to an
Airworthiness Inspector. The assigned Inspector is therefore responsible for the following:
- Evaluation and reviewing the application and the documentation submitted by the applicant
for a CofR,
- Liaison with the applicant during all phases of the process,
- Arranging for on-site survey and review of the applicants aircraft and the technical
documentation,
- Maintaining detailed records of all correspondence, reports, meetings, etc. in relation to the
application and continued surveillance,
- Making recommendation report as to the suitability of the aircraft for a Certificate of
Registration,
- Ensure that the required procedures are adhered to, and
- Ensuring that all correspondence, audit reports etc. are compiled on completion of the
investigation and filed in the aircraft documentation.

1. Each applicant for a Certificate of Aircraft Registration must submit the following
documents to CARC:
a) A properly completed application form CARC Form 18-0233;
b) The Aircraft Bill of Sale, or other evidence of ownership authorized in accordance
with Part 47;
c) Settlement of applicable fees ;
d) Additional support documentation, when it is proposed to register the aircraft in the
name of a company, confirming the status of the company under the Jordanian law.
2. In accordance with JCAR Part 47, an aircraft shall not be registered or continue to be
registered in Jordan Civil Aircraft Register unless it:
a) is wholly owned by a citizen of Jordan or a permanent resident in Jordan, or
b) is owned or leased with the purpose of purchase or leased for a period of not less than
twelve months by a Jordanian citizen, or
c) is owned by a company or corporation registered in Jordan in accordance with the laws
and regulations of the Ministry of Industry and Commerce and has a place of business
therein.
3. An aircraft shall not be registered in Jordan Civil Aircraft Register:

a) If it appears to CARC that it is registered in another state, or
b) If it appears to CARC that any applicable requirements under the Civil Aviation Law,
Orders, Regulations or Directions made thereunder, relating to the safety of the
operation or the airworthiness of that aircraft, cannot be complied with.
CARC shall perform sufficient investigation activities for an applicant for, or holder of, a
registration certificate to justify the issuance, maintenance, amendment, suspension or revocation of
the certificate.
In no case any aircraft may be operated unless there is an appropriate registration certificate issued
to and valid for that aircraft.
The following procedures are generally applied to the issuance of a certificate of registration, and
will consider any other specific procedures which may be prescribed in paragraphs dealing with
individual registration categories as specified in JCAR Part 47.
The AWSD assigned Inspector evaluates at least the following elements:
1. Eligibility of the applicant to register the aircraft in Jordan,

2. Evaluate the application form (CARC Form 18-0233) in respect of completeness and
accuracy of the information provided,
3. Availability of whatever additional support information as may be required in a particular
case,
4. Evidence of settlement of applicable fees, copy of receipt,
5. Establish if the aircraft was previously registered in Jordan,
6. Acceptability of the aircraft for registration in Jordan,
7. Compliance with Noise requirements as applicable,
8. Scope of the proposed use of the aircraft,

9. Confirmation that aircraft is not registered elsewhere,

10. Verify that the previous Mode ‘S’ transponder code has been de-activated, if applicable,
11. Arrange with the applicant to make the aircraft available for CARC survey and inspection as
deemed necessary,
12. Determine that the registration marks are properly displayed in accordance with JCAR Part
47,
13. Determine that the aircraft identification plate is in accordance with JCAR Part 47,
14. Ensure that all required information have entered in the aircraft register.
When the above items are resolved to the satisfaction of AWSD and checklist CARC Form 18-
0208-1 is properly completed, a certificate of registration may be issued to the aircraft.
If the aircraft does not meet the requirements and issuance of a certificate of registration is denied, a
letter will be sent to the applicant within 72 hrs, after the decision is made stating the reason(s) for
denying the issuance of the certificate. A copy of the denial letter should be attached to the
application and filed with the aircraft record.
If new application is made , and CARC Airworthiness Inspector has reason to suspect that a letter of
denial may exist, the inspector should check the aircraft documentation for the possible existence of
such letter for a particular aircraft, as this may assist the Inspector in determining aircraft eligibility.
3.5 Issuance of a Certificate of Registration
CARC shall, as applicable, issue, or amend a Certificate of Registration (CARC form 18-0234),
without undue delay when it is satisfied that the applicable requirements of JCAR Part 47 are met.
The assigned Inspector will complete/ensure completion of, following steps as part of the
registration process;
1. Entering the following information in the hard copy registration book; Civil Aircraft
Register, and electronic copies as backup in the AWS System;
- Registration Number,
- Registration Mark,
- Registration Date,
- Owner name, nationality and address,
- Operator name, nationality and address,
- Aircraft Information: Country, Name and Date of Manufacture, Aircraft Type, MSN,
Engine Type and Number of Engines, Propeller Type, APU Type, Max. Take-off Mass,
Max. Landing Mass, Category, Mortgagee Name and Mortgage Letter No.
- De-registration Date, and
- Inspector’s Name, Signature and Date.
2. Where the aircraft was previously entered on the Jordanian civil aircraft register, the
previous registration marks may be allocated and the next sequential number used as the
registration number.
3. When an aircraft of a type is first entered in Jordan Civil Aircraft Register, the State of
design and manufacture is advised.
4. The Certificate of Registration (CARC Form 18-0234) is prepared and submitted to the
CEO/Chief Commissioner for signature.

5. All documents including the issued Certificate of Registration, correspondences, reports etc.
are compiled and filed in the aircraft file.
6. When the Certificate of Registration is signed by the CEO/Chief Commissioner, the
certificate is sent to the applicant and a copy is retained on aircraft file.
A Certificate of Registration shall be issued for an unlimited duration. It shall remain valid subject
to:
1. Continued compliance with the requirement of JCAR Part 47, and
2. The certificate is not being suspended, revoked or surrendered.
Upon surrender or revocation, the certificate shall be returned to CARC.
The CARC assigned Inspector for aircraft will monitor the status of the Certificates of Registration
for aircraft entered on the Jordanian Civil Aircraft Register.
Where a change takes place in the ownership of an aircraft registered in Jordan or the requirements
for ownership as prescribed in Part 47 cease to be fulfilled in respect of such an aircraft, the
registered owner at the time of that change shall forthwith notify CARC of the change.
A person who becomes the owner of an aircraft registered on Jordan shall forthwith notify
CARC of that fact .
Upon receipt of a notification of any change together with a completed application form and
evidence of settlement of appropriate fee, the application will be processed in accordance with the
relevant section of the initial application and investigation process.
Within 30 days after any change in the permanent mailing address, the holder of a Certificate of
Aircraft Registration for an aircraft shall notify CARC of the new address. A revised Certificate of
Aircraft Registration is then issued.
3.7 Suspension and Revocation
If CARC is satisfied that any of the aircraft registration requirements cease to be legally complied
with Jordanian laws and/or regulations, the requirements for ownership are no longer valid, a
change has occurred or that any person has become the owner of an aircraft registered in Jordan,
CARC may, as it thinks fit, either cause the registration of the aircraft to be cancelled or, on receipt
of an appropriate application and settlement of the applicable fee, cause the relevant
particulars entered in the register in respect of that aircraft.
Upon issuance of the notice of cancellation or suspension of a Certificate of Registration, CARC

shall state the reasons for the cancellation or revocation and inform the holder of the certificate on
its right to appeal.
Upon surrender or revocation, the certificate shall be returned to CARC.
The certificate of registration shall also be cancelled in cases specified in JCAR Part 47, Para.
47.41.

3.8 Records
CARC system of record keeping allows adequate traceability of the process to issue, maintain,
amend, suspend or revoke each individual registration certificate.
The records contain:
- The documents provided by the applicant,

- Documents established during the investigation, in which the activities and final results of
the elements evaluated during the investigation phase, and
- A copy of the certificate, including amendments.
In addition, a hard copy registration book containing details of all aircraft on Jordanian civil aircraft
register is maintained by the AWS Directorate.
The records shall be archived for a minimum retention period of six years after the aircraft has been
removed from the Jordanian Civil aircraft register.
3.9 Exemptions
CARC may grant exemptions from requirements laid down in the JCAR Part 47 Regulation in the
event of unforeseen urgent operational circumstances or operational needs of a limited duration,
provided the level of safety is not adversely affected thereby.
Exemptions will be processed in accordance with Chapter 6 – Petitions of CEO Order 1-2013
(General Rule Making Procedures).
All exemptions granted in accordance with CEO Order 1-2013 General Rule Making, shall be
recorded and retained by CARC.
3.10 De-registration of Aircraft
The procedure for de-registration of an aircraft (CARC Form 18-0238) is detailed in Guidance
Procedure No. AWS 28 “Deregistration of Aircraft”; which is intended to assist the aviation
industry in Jordan and CARC Airworthiness Inspectors to process the applications for
deregistration of Jordanian registered aircraft.
3.11 Export Certificate of Airworthiness
The procedure for issuing an Export Certificate of Airworthiness (CARC Form 18-0231) is detailed
in Guidance Procedure No. AWS 28 “Deregistration of Aircraft”; which is intended to assist the
aviation industry in Jordan and CARC Airworthiness Inspectors to process the applications for
issuing an Export Certificate of Airworthiness for Jordanian registered aircraft.

Part 4
Certificate of Airworthiness
This procedure describes how CARC will handle issuance, renewal and continued validity of the
Certificates of Airworthiness in respect of aircraft eligible for registration on Jordanian civil aircraft
register.
CARC shall perform sufficient investigation activities for an applicant for, or holder of, an
airworthiness certificate to justify the issuance, renewal, maintenance, amendment, suspension or
revocation of the certificate.
The continued validity of the Certificates of Airworthiness issued in respect of aircraft on the
Jordanian Civil aircraft register shall be monitored under the conditions of CARC Continued
Surveillance Program, to ensure continued compliance with the requirements of Part M and other
applicable JCAR.
AWSD certificate of airworthiness issuance process is documented in CARC Form 18-0208, while
the continued validity, renewal and continued oversight of a certificate of airworthiness issued by
CARC are carried out through activities specified in the aircraft continued surveillance program, the
associated procedures, AMC and GM, to ensure continued compliance with the requirements of
Part M and other applicable JCAR. This includes:
- Evaluation of applications for renewal submitted to CARC including the applicants’ produced
Airworthiness Review Report and Recommendation (ARR&R),
- Conducting detailed reviews and inspections of the aircraft continuing airworthiness records,
- Conducting physical surveys of aircraft,
- Conducting ramp inspections
The Director Airworthiness Standards has overall responsibility for the issuance of the Certificate
of Airworthiness and its validity. The Director is assisted in this task by the Chief Division. The day
to day supervision on the status of the Certificates of Airworthiness is the responsibility of the
assigned Airworthiness Inspector. The assigned Inspector is therefore responsible for the following:
- Reviewing documentation submitted by the applicant for the C of A issuance or renewal,

- Liaison with the applicant during all phases of the process,
- Arranging for surveys/audits of the applicants’ aircraft and associated technical
documentation,
- Producing review and surveillance reports including details of all noncompliance,
- Communicating the findings to the applicant and ensuring that all findings of
noncompliance are rectified,
- Maintaining detailed records of all correspondence, reports, meetings etc. in relation to the
application and continued surveillance,
- Making recommendation report as to the suitability of the aircraft for a Certificate of
Airworthiness issuance, renewal and continued validity to Chief Division,

- Ensure that the required procedures are adhered to; and

- Ensuring that all correspondence, reports etc. are compiled on the completion of the process
and are filed in the aircraft documents.
An application for a C of A shall be made by an eligible applicant pusuant to the requirements in

21.A.172 and in a form and manner established by CARC.
Each application for a certificate of airworthiness or restricted certificate of airworthiness shall
include:
- The class of airworthiness certificate applied for and a properly completed application form,
“CARC Form 18-0118”,
- With regard to a new aircraft, the documentation required by point 21.A.174(b)(2),
- With regard to a used aircraft, the documentation required by point 21.A.174(b)(3)
Statements referred to in points 21.A.174(b)(2)(i) and 21.A.174(b)(3)(i) shall be issued no more

than 60 days before presentation of the aircraft to CARC.
CARC investigation activities shall cover at least the following elements:
- Aircraft registration eligibility/validity in accordance with Part 47;
- evaluation of eligibility of the applicant;
- evaluation of the eligibility of the application;
- classification of airworthiness certificates;
- review and evaluation of the documentation received with the application;
- survey and inspection of aircraft and its documents;
- determination of necessary conditions, restrictions or limitations to the airworthiness

certificates.
With regards to a new aircraft, the applicant shall demonstrate to CARC/AWSD that:
- the aircraft conforms to an approved/accepted design and is in a condition for safe operation;
or
- In case of a resricted certificate of airworthiness, the applicant demonstration that the

aircraft conforms to a design approved/accepted by CARC under a restricted type-certificate
or in accordance with specific airworthiness specifications, and is in a condition for safe
operation.

With regards to a used aircraft, the applicant demonstration to CARC/AWSD that:
- the aircraft conforms to a type design approved (accepted by CARC) under a type-certificate
and any supplemental type-certificate, change or repair approved in accordance with Part 21;
or
- In case of a resricted certificate of airworthiness, the aircraft conforms to a design
approved/accepted by CARC under a restricted type-certificate or in accordance with
specific airworthiness specifications and any supplemental type-certificate change or repair
approved in accordance with Part 21; and
- the applicable airworthiness directives have been complied with; and
- the aircraft has been inspected in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part M and an
airworthiness review report and airworthiness review recommendation have been submitted,
and
- the aircraft conforms to an approved/accepted design and is in a condition for safe operation.
Note: Limitations for use will be associated with restricted certificates of airworthiness, including
airspace restrictions, and other necessary conditions, restrictions or limitations as appropriate
CARC shall perform sufficient investigation activities for aircraft registration eligibility/validity, an
applicant for, or holder of, an airworthiness certificate to justify the issuance of a certificate of
airworthiness. AWSD investigation processes for the issuance of a certificate of airworthiness
issuance is documented in CARC Form 18-0208, 18-0208-1 through 18-0208-4.
- CARC Form 18-0208-1 “Aircraft Registration Requirements”,
- CARC Form 18-0208-2 “Airworthiness Requirements for Aircraft first of type to be certified
by CARC”,
- CARC Form 18-0208-3 “Airworthiness Requirements for “New Aircraft” of a type accepted
by CARC”,
- CARC Form 18-0208-4 “Airworthiness Requirements for “Used Aircraft” of a type

previously certified by CARC”.
In no case may any aircraft be operated unless there is an appropriate airworthiness certificate
issued and is valid for that aircraft. When the above requirements are satisfactory completed, the
certificate of airworthiness will be issued as described in paragraph 4.5
If the aircraft does not meet the requirements for the certification requested and the airworthiness
certificate is denied, a letter will be written to the applicant, within 72 hrs., stating reason(s) for
denying the certificate. A copy of the denial letter should be attached to the application and filed
with the aircraft documentation.
Therefore, when an application for airworthiness certificate is made, and CARC inspector has
reason to suspect such letter may exist, the inspector should check with the aircraft documentation
for the possible existence of a denial letter for a particular aircraft, as this may assist the Inspector in
determining aircraft eligibility.

4.5 Issuance of the Certificate of Airworthiness
CARC shall, as applicable, issue, or amend a Certificate of Airworthiness (CARC Form 18-0119)
without undue delay when it is satisfied that the investigation process specified in para. 4.4 is
satisfactorily completed and the applicable regulatory requirements of Part 21 and Part M are met.
In addition to a first issuance of an airworthiness certificate for a new aircraft or used aircraft,
CARC shall issue an initial airworthiness review certificate (CARC Form 18-0015a).
4.6 Duration and continued validity

A Certificate of airworthiness is issued for duration of 24 calendar months. It shall remain valid and
eligible for the renewal at the end of 24 calendar months subject to:
- compliance with the applicable type-design and the continuing airworthiness requirements;
and
- the aircraft remaining on the register; and
- the type-certificate or restricted type-certificate under which it is issued not being previously
invalidated under point 21.A.51;
- the certificate not being surrendered or revoked under point 21.A.181 (b).
4.7 Renewals and continued oversight
To ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft, the following activities are monitored,
supervised and/or carried out by the AWSD as appropriate using the checklist CARC Form 18-0304
“Continuing Airworthiness Records Review and Physical Survey of Aircraft”:
- Annual review and survey of aircraft
An annual airworthiness review and aircraft physical survey process is established in accordance
with the requirements of Part M, the associated AMC and GM. The process includes review and
survey of following:
a. Airframe, engine and propeller flying hours and associated flight cycles have been properly
recorded, and,
b. The Flight Manual is applicable to the aircraft configuration and reflects the latest revision
status, and,
c. All the maintenance due on the aircraft according to the approved maintenance program has
been carried out, and,
d. All known defects have been corrected or, when applicable, carried forward in a controlled
manner, and,
e. All applicable airworthiness directives have been applied and properly registered, and,
f. All modifications and repairs applied to the aircraft have been registered and are approved
according to Part-21, and,
g. All service life limited components installed on the aircraft are properly identified,
registered and have not exceeded their approved service life limit, and,
h. All maintenance has been performed and the aircraft released to service by an appropriately
approved maintenance organization, and,

i. The current mass and balance statement reflects the configuration of the aircraft and is valid,
and,
j. The aircraft complies with the latest revision of its type design approved/accepted by
CARC,
k. All required markings and placards are properly installed, and,
l. The aircraft complies with its approved flight manual, and,
m. The aircraft configuration complies with the approved documentation, and,
n. No evident defect can be found that has not been addressed according to approved Minimum
Equipment List or otherwise deferred under a system approved by CARC, and,
o. No inconsistencies can be found between the aircraft and the documented review of records.
Based on satisfactory completion of the airworthiness’ review and survey, an airworthiness review
report and recommendation are produced by the holder of a certificate of airworthiness or, as
applicable, by the holder’s contracted organization in accordance with AWSD published regulations
and Airworthiness Instructions, and submitted to CARC/AWSD annually along with application for
renewal, for compliance review and evaluation by the assigned airworthiness inspector, and
subsequently performing verification activities if necessary and renewal of the airworthiness
review certificate and the certificate of airworthiness, as appropriate.
- Oversight of a certificate of airworthiness
The continued oversight of a certificate of airworthiness issued by CARC is carried out by AWSD
in accordance with the established aircraft continued surveillance program, which include following
activities:
- Evaluating applications for renewal submitted to CARC/AWSD including the applicants’
produced Airworthiness Review Report and Recommendation (ARR&R),
- Conducting detailed reviews and inspections of the aircraft continuing airworthiness records,
- Conducting physical surveys of aircraft,
- Conducting ramp inspections
If during aircraft reviews, surveys and/or inspections or by other means evidence is found showing
noncompliance to Part-M requirement, CARC shall take the following actions:
- for level 1 findings, CARC/AWSD shall require appropriate corrective action to be taken
before further flight and immediate action shall be taken to revoke or suspend the
airworthiness review certificate and subsequently the certificate of airworthiness.
- for level 2 findings, the corrective action required by the CARC/AWSD shall be appropriate
to the nature of the finding.
If the root cause of the finding identifies a noncompliance with any Subpart or with another Part of
regulations, the noncompliance shall be dealt with as prescribed by the relevant Part.
4.8 Suspension and revocation of airworthiness certificates
- Upon evidence that any of the conditions specified in point 21.A.181(a) and in para. 4.6 above
is not met, CARC shall suspend or revoke an airworthiness certificate.

- Upon issuance of the notice of suspension and revocation of a certificate of airworthiness or

restricted certificate of airworthiness, CARC shall state the reasons for the suspension or
revocation and inform the holder of the certificate of its right to appeal.
- Upon surrender or revocation, the certificate shall be returned to CARC.
4.9 Record keeping
CARC/AWSD established a system of record-keeping that allows adequate traceability of the

process to issue, renew, amend, suspend or revoke each individual certificate of airworthiness.
The records for each individual aircraft contain:
- the documents provided by the applicant;
- Documents established during the investigation process, in which the activities and the final
results of the elements defined in Para. 4.4 are stated; and
- a copy of the certificate including amendments.
The records are archived for a minimum retention period of six years after leaving that aircraft
national register.
4.10 Exemptions

Part 5
Maintenance Organization Approval
This procedure describes how CARC will handle initial applications, variations and continued
surveillance for approval of maintenance organizations and how CARC organization is structured to
perform this task. The approval shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of the Jordan
Civil Aviation Regulations Part 145 and will follow the related AMC and GM.
The approval of maintenance organizations will be carried out using this procedure and shall be
monitored under the AWSD Annual Audit Plan, so as to ensure continued compliance with the
requirements of Part 145.
This procedure describes how CARC will handle the initial approval, the continuation of the
approval, the change of limitations, suspension or revocation of approvals and the resolution of non-
compliances.
The Director of Airworthiness Standards has overall responsibility for all aspects of Maintenance
Organization Approvals. He is assisted in this task by the Chief Division who will determine how
individual audits shall be conducted and will assign an audit/certification team or an individual
Inspector depending on the nature and scale of the organization requiring audit. The assigned
Inspector/Team Leader is therefore responsible for the following:
- Reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant;
- Liaison with the applicant during all phases of the process;
- Arranging for an audit of the applicant’s proposed organization in conjunction with the
Chief Division;
- Arranging for formal acceptance in writing of the Key Management Personnel;
- Producing an audit report including details of all non-compliance findings;
- Communicating the audit findings to the applicant and ensuring all non-compliance
findings are rectified;
- Maintaining detailed records of all correspondence, reports, meetings etc in relation to the
application and continued surveillance;
- Making a recommendation report as to the suitability of the organization for approval to
the Chief Division;
- Ensuring that the required procedures are adhered to; and
- Ensuring that all correspondence, audit reports etc are compiled on completion of the
process and submitted to the document control centre for final filing.
When acting as The Team leader, the Inspector must also be capable of performing the following
additional duties:
- Organizing the work of the team, with respect to planning, areas to be audited, work
sharing between team members, etc;
- Identifying particular areas of expertise which may be required for specialized activities
such as NDT etc and arranging the availability of an Inspector within AID with expertise
in the particular area;
- Notifying the applicant of the process which will be applied during all
certification/approval phases;
- Reporting to the Chief Division any problems encountered during the process and
proposing resolutions.

An application for an Approved Maintenance Organization Approval shall be made in a manner

acceptable to Chief Commissioner/CARC. The governing rules are prescribed in JCAR Part 145.
The application usually starts with a letter of intent which is submitted to CARC.
When the letter is received, this is processed in accordance with the administrative procedures
described in Part 2 of this handbook.
The letter is reviewed by the Chief Division, who will liaise with the applicant and seek additional
information or clarification as may be required. When the letter is accepted by the Director
Airworthiness Standards Standards/Chief Division, the applicant will be entitled to proceed to
Phase I of the certification process.
This phase starts with an informal meeting in CARC/Airworthiness Office. The

Accountable Manager of the proposed organization should participate in this meeting
which will include:
- A general presentation by the applicant, outlining the proposed scope of work and
capability of the Maintenance Organization,
- A description by the Certification team of the certification process which will be
followed in assessing the applicant for approval.
The applicant will also be provided with the following documents by the Certification
team:
- CARC Form 18-0135 “Pre-Application Statement of Intent (PASI)”,
- A copy of JCAR Part 145 “Approved Maintenance Organizations”.
The applicant will be given a period of time, usually one month, to prepare and submit
the PASI.
Notes on this meeting shall be kept in the Certification file.
When the PASI is submitted and found satisfactory by the Certification team, the
applicant will be entitled to proceed to Phase II of the certification process.
In the Formal Application Phase, the applicant shall submit the following additional documents:
1. Completed application form CARC Form 18-0148,

2. CV’s of Key Management Positions. CARC Form 18-0285 can be used for this
purpose,
3. A Maintenance Organization Exposition (MOE) detailing the organizations
Management Structure, Policies/Procedures, Quality System etc as required by
JCAR 145.
4. Applicable fees in accordance with the regulations as published on CARC website
The application is received and processed through the administration control system described in
Part 2 of this handbook. As part of this process, the administration centre shall establish that the
required fee(s) have been paid.
When the above documents are received, the Certification team/ Inspector(s) assigned to the
application will review these for general acceptance and liaise with the applicant as deemed
necessary. If required, a further meeting with the applicant will be conducted to highlight the
acceptance of the submitted material or any deficiencies found during the certification review.

The final outcome of this phase is the acceptance of the Formal application and its attachments.
During this phase, the Certification team/ Inspector(s) assigned to the certification will review in
detail the content of the Maintenance Organization Exposition for compliance with the requirements
of JCAR 145 including in particular;
- The Management Organization Structure, including the Accountable Manager and

senior Management Personnel;
- Verification that the Accountable Manager has signed the Corporate Commitment
Statement in the MOE;
- The proposed work scope and capability of the organization;
- The availability of the required certifying staff with qualifications relevant to the
planned work scope;
- The facilities available for the planned maintenance;
- The procedures for the provision of tooling, equipment etc;
- The procedures for the provision and control of technical documentation;
- Sub Contracted arrangements, if applicable;
- The Quality Assurance System.
The Inspector will liaise with the applicant and seek clarification, amendment to the MOE so as to
fully comply with JCAR 145 requirements.
The outcome of this phase is the acceptance of the MOE for initial physical audit of the
organization. The applicant will be advised of this fact in writing by the assigned Inspector and
arrangements will be made to conduct a physical audit of the organization.
As referenced in Paragraph 5.2, the Chief Division will determine how individual audits shall be
conducted and will assign an audit team or an individual Inspector depending on the nature and
scale of the organization requiring audit.
The physical inspection and audit of the organization will be carried out using CARC Form 18-
0268. The organization will be audited to ensure that the requirements of JCAR 145 are satisfied
and that the procedures reflected in the MOE are actually being followed. The extent of the audit
required will be determined by the nature and scale of the organization’s maintenance activity. The
assigned Inspector/Team Leader will determine the areas to be audited and will select a particular
product line so that the audit can be concentrated on one type only for a full compliance check and
dependent upon the result, the second type may only require a sample check against those activities
seen to be weak on compliance for the first type.
During the accomplishment of the audit, the auditing Inspector(s) will ensure that the following
procedure is followed, so as to ensure that the organization is fully aware of any findings identified.
- The auditor(s) should always be accompanied throughout the audit by a senior

technical representative of the organization. This is usually the Quality Manger;
- A meeting with the Accountable Manger shall be convened at least once during the
process of approval, to ensure that he/she fully understands the significance of the
approval and the reason for signing the exposition commitment of the organization
to comply with the procedures specified in the exposition;
- The auditor(s) shall inform the Senior Technical Representative/Quality Manager
of the organization at the end of the audit visit of all findings identified during the
audit;

- In the event that the auditor(s) are unsure about compliance in a particular
organization, the auditor(s), will inform the organization verbally about possible
non-compliance at the time of the audit and the fact that the situation will be
reviewed further within CARC before a final decision is made.
5.4.5 Review of Findings
On completion of the physical audit of the organization, the assigned Inspector/Team Leader will
compile all documentation relating to the audit and ensure that;
- Findings are recorded on the audit report form CARC Form 18-0268 with a
provisional categorization as a Level 1 or Level 2;
- Provisional finding levels are reviewed with the Chief Division/Team members as
appropriate, adjusted if necessary and changed from provisional to confirmed;
- If the result of the review finds that the organization is in compliance, a verbal
confirmation shall be given to the organization;
- All findings of confirmed non-compliance shall be confirmed in writing to
the organization within one week of the audit visit;
- Liaison is maintained with the organization on the required corrective actions to
address the findings;
- Detailed records of all correspondence, reports, meetings etc in relation to the
approval are compiled;
- All findings must be corrected before the approval can be issued.
When the assigned Inspector/Team Leader is satisfied that the corrective actions are satisfactory
and that the organization is now ready for approval, the following additional steps will be taken in
order to progress to Phase V.
- A final report is prepared using CARC Form 18-0268 together with meeting of
minutes, correspondence etc. The report shall include the date each finding was
cleared together with a reference to the correspondence received from the
organization regarding clearance of the finding;
- Complete the recommendation for approval section of CARC Form 18-0268 for
submission to the Chief Division;
- Verify that all applicable fees have been paid.
The Chief Division will then conduct a quality review of all the documentation and consider:
- The relevant paragraphs of JCAR 145;
- The categorization of finding levels and the closure action taken;
- Completion and accuracy of CARC Form 18-0268
If this review is deemed satisfactory, the Chief Division will sign the recommendation section of
CARC Form 18-0268.
5.4.6 Phase V Issue of Certificate
Once the recommendation report is finalized, the assigned Inspector will arrange for:
- Formal acceptance in writing of the MOE;
- Formal acceptance in writing of the Management Personnel (CARC Form 18-
0285);
- Prepare two copies of the approval certificate, CARC Form 18-0127. The next
numeric sequential number will be allocated to the approval certificate;
- Updating the register of Approved Maintenance Organizations;
- Signing of the approval certificate by Chief Commissioner CARC;
- Forwarding the approval certificate to the applicant;
- Presentation of all documents for filing in the documentation control centre.

The continuation of an approval shall be monitored in accordance with the AWSD continuous
surveillance programme. The programme for JCAR 145 Maintenance Organization Approvals
identifies when the audit visits are due and when such visits are carried out and provides for one
complete audit once per year and two sample audits in the year. In the case of organizations who
also have line stations, the surveillance programme provides for a sampling programme based upon
the number of line stations and complexity of same.
AWSD policy requires that part of any audit accomplished concentrates on two ongoing aspects of
the Part 145 approval, namely the organizations internal self monitoring quality reports produced by
the quality monitoring personnel to determine if the organization is identifying and correcting its
problems and secondly the number of concessions granted by the Quality Manager.
The Chief Division for Maintenance Organization Approvals is responsible for ensuring that the
planned surveillance programme is adhered to and will:
- Ensure that each organization is completely reviewed for compliance with JCAR Part 145
at periods of 12 months;
- Ensure that at least one sample audit is accomplished once per year;
- Ensure that the Accountable Manager is seen at least once every 12 months and briefed
on any findings or issues requiring attention;
- At the successful conclusion of an audit, complete the audit report form CARC Form 18-
0268, including all recorded findings, closure actions and recommendations;
- Liaise with the organization as required in relation to audit findings, requests for changes,
amendment to the MOE etc;
- Maintain records of all correspondences, reports, etc and ensuring that these are delivered
to the documentation centre for filing.
5.6 Findings
When non-compliance findings are noted during the accomplishment of an audit, these findings are
categorised as Level 1 or Level 2. A description of these findings is as follows:
Level 1 is where CARC finds a significant non-compliance with Part 145. The following are
examples of Level 1 findings:
- Failure to gain access to the organization during normal operating hours of the
organization after two written requests;
- If the calibration control of equipment as required by Part 145 had previously broken
down on a particular type product line such that most “calibrated” equipment was suspect
from that time.
Note: A complete product line is defined as all the aircraft, engine, or components of a particular
type.
In the case of a suspect Level 1 finding, the auditing Inspector(s) will immediately contact the Chief
Division and advise him of the situation. If as a result of discussions with the Chief and further
consideration of the issues involved, the finding is confirmed, immediate action shall be taken to
revoke, limit or suspend in whole or in part, depending upon the extent of the level 1 finding, the
maintenance organization approval, until successful corrective action has been taken by the
organization. The corrective action required may involve further maintenance and re-certification of
all affected products, depending on the nature of the finding.
The auditing Inspector(s) shall immediately advise the organization verbally of the outcome and
formally advise the organization in writing of the finding within 72 hrs.
Level 2 is where CARC finds a non-compliance with Part 145 against one product or component.
Examples include:

- One time use of a component without a serviceable tag;

- The training documents for certifying staff are not completed.
For level 2 findings, the corrective action period granted by the auditing Inspector(s) must be
appropriate to the nature of the finding, but in any case must not be more than three months.
Where the organization has not implemented the necessary corrective action within the agreed
period, the auditing Inspector(s) may agree to extend the period for a further period of up to three
months. In this case, consideration will be given to the nature of the finding and the action taken by
the organization to address the finding. If the extension is agreed, the Accountable Manager will be
advised in writing of the extension. If the extension is not agreed, the organization will be advised
verbally initially and the Accountable Manager will be advised in writing within 72 hrs.
In exceptional circumstance and subject to a realistic corrective action plan being in place, CARC
may specifically vary the maximum six month corrective action period.
If this situation arises, the findings, corrective action plan and past performance of the organization
are reviewed with the Chief Division/Team members as appropriate.
If such an extension period is agreed, the auditing Inspector will arrange to formally advise the
Accountable Manger in writing.
5.7 Changes
CARC policy requires that changes to the organization be monitored and controlled.
The approved maintenance organizations are required to advise CARC of any proposed changes as
specified in the organizations MOE. These changes include:
- The name of the organization;
- The main location of the organization;
- Additional locations of the organization;
- The Accountable Manager;
- Key Management Personnel;
- The facilities, equipment, tools, material, procedures, work scope or certifying staff that
could affect the approval.
Depending on the extent of the change, CARC will apply the applicable elements of the initial
approval review process.
CARC will also prescribe the conditions which may be applied during such changes unless it
determines that the approval should be suspended.
The approved maintenance organizations will normally communicate any proposed changes
through the office of the Director Airworthiness Standards. The assigned inspector will liaise with
the Chief Division on any special conditions which may be applied and also arrange for the
accomplishment of any audits required to establish compliance with Part 145 requirements and
ensure that:
- The applicable parts of CARC Form 18-0268 are completed, including all recorded
findings, closure actions and recommendations;
- Appropriate liaison is maintained with the organization as required in relation to audit
findings;
- Letters of approval, certificates etc as may be required as part of the change are prepared
for distribution within CARC and to the organization concerned.
- Records are maintained of all correspondence, reports etc, ensuring that these are
delivered to the documentation centre for filing.
5.8 MOE Amendments
CARC policy is such that all amendments to the Maintenance Organization Exposition shall be
assessed and approved by CARC.

An exposition status sheet is maintained within the AWSD to control all amendments to the MOE
including;
- The Issue/Revision numbers;
- The date when amendments are received and;
- The date when amendments are approved.
The Chief Division is responsible to monitor the Status sheet of all MOEs. The assigned Inspector
is responsible to update the status of the affected MOE, which is controlled as follows:
- The organization submits all proposed amendments to CARC/AWSD;
- The assigned Inspector will review the proposed amendment and if necessary arrange for
an audit of the organization as described elsewhere in this handbook;
- When all Part 145 requirements are deemed satisfactory, the assigned Inspector will
arrange to formally advise the organization of the MOE amendment approval in writing;
- The exposition status sheet is updated to reflect the amendment;
- Records of correspondence, reports etc are delivered to the documentation centre for
filing.
- The updated pages shall be submitted to the Technical Library by the assigned inspector.
5.9 Revocation, suspension and limitation of approval
The Chief Division is responsible for the day to day surveillance of the Maintenance Organization
Approvals in order to ensure continued compliance with JCAR Part 145.
The process for ensuring continued compliance is reflected in the continued surveillance
programme and rectification of non-compliance findings as described elsewhere in this handbook.
CARC shall;
- Suspend an approval on reasonable grounds in the case of a potential safety threat; or
- Suspend, revoke or limit an approval in the case where appropriate corrective action has
not been implemented in respect of findings identified by CARC.
Such action will only be deemed necessary after all of the issues are fully considered by
AWSD/CARC management.
Formal notification to the organization concerned will initially be given verbally and confirmed in
writing within 72 hrs.
5.10 Records
CARC has established a record keeping system as described in Chapter 2 of this handbook. This
system provides for adequate traceability of the process to issue, continue, change, suspend or
revoke each individual organization approval.
The records shall include as a minimum:
a. The application for an organization approval, including the continuation thereof;
b. The AWSD continued oversight program including all audit records;
c. The organization approval certificate including any change thereto;
d. A copy of the audit program listing the dates when audits are due and when audits were
carried out;
e. Copies of all formal correspondence including CARC Form 18-0285 or equivalent;
f. Details of any exemption and enforcement action(s);
g. CARC internal administration forms, minutes of meeting etc;
h. Maintenance Organization Expositions.
The minimum retention period for the above records shall be six years.
CARC primarily utilizes a hard copy record system, but a computerized system is used as an aid.

5.11 Exemptions
5.12 Safety Management System (SMS)
An SMS manual shall be submitted to CARC by a maintenance organization; which is to be

reviewed by an airworthiness inspector and approved by the Director Airworthiness Standards. The
SMS manual for a maintenance organization may be integrated in one manual if the organization
holds other approvals by CARC such as, but not limited to, AOC or FTO, in this case the final
approval and fees responsibility is on the FOSD.
The assigned inspector shall ensure that the SMS manual is in compliance with the following
requirements:
a. Administration and control of the safety management system (SMS) manual:

1. A statement that the manual complies with all applicable regulations.
2. A statement that the manual contains safety instructions that are to be complied with by
the relevant personnel.
3. Explanations and definitions of terms and words used in the manual.
b. System of amendment and revision of the SMS manual.
c. Organization and responsibilities:

1. A description of the organizational structure including the general company organigram.
2. The name of the nominated post holders.
d. SMS regulatory requirements: Address current SMS regulations and guidance material for
necessary reference and awareness by all concerned.
e. Scope and integration of the safety management system:

1. Description of the scope and extent of the organization’s aviation-related operations and
facilities within which the SMS will apply. The scope of the processes, equipment and
operations deemed eligible for the organization’s hazard identification and risk management
(HIRM) program should also be addressed.
2. Identification of the major areas, departments, workshops and facilities of the
organization within which the SMS will apply.
3. Identification of the major processes, operations and equipment which are deemed
eligible for the organization’s HIRM program, especially those which are pertinent to
aviation safety.
f. Safety policy: Description of the organization’s intentions, management principles and

commitment to improving aviation safety in terms of the product or service provider.
g. Safety objectives: Description of the safety objectives of the organization.

h. Safety accountabilities and key personnel: Description of the safety authorities,

responsibilities and accountabilities for personnel involved in the SMS.
i. Safety reporting and remedial actions: A reporting system should include both reactive
(accident/incident reports, etc.) and proactive / predictive (hazard reports).
j. Hazard identification and risk assessment: Description of the hazard identification system
and how such data are collated.
k. Safety performance monitoring and measurement: Description of the safety performance

monitoring and measurement component of the SMS. This includes the organization’s SMS
safety performance indicators (SPIs).
l. Safety-related investigations and remedial actions: Description of how

accidents/incidents/occurrences are investigated and processed within the organization,
including their correlation with the organization’s SMS hazard identification and risk
management system.
m. Safety training and communication: Description of the type of SMS and other safety-related
training that staff receives and the process for assuring the effectiveness of the training.
n. Continuous improvement and sms audit: Description of the process for the continuous
review and improvement of the SMS.
o. SMS records management: Description of the method of storing all SMS-related records and
documents.
p. Management of change: Description of the organization’s process for managing changes

that may have an impact on safety risks and how such processes are integrated with the
SMS.
q. Emergency/contingency response plan: Description of the organization’s intentions

regarding, and commitment to dealing with, emergency situations and their corresponding
recovery controls. Outline the roles and responsibilities of key personnel. The emergency
response plan can be a separate document or it can be part of the SMS manual.
5.13 Foreign Part 145 Acceptance (FAMO)
CARC may accept Foreign AMOs that are located outside the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, if
initially there is a demonstrated need by a Jordanian operator.
In practice, there are difficulties linked to the fact that Jordan may not have the necessary means
to ensure proper oversight of FAMOs located abroad. To overcome these difficulties, Jordan has
found it convenient to rely on the approval and oversight system of the host State to issue the
acceptance by accepting the approval given by another State. This may lead to the establishment
of supplementary conditions; CARC Supplement to the NAA approved MOE.
CARC has established Guidance Procedure No. AWS 24 “Foreign Approved Maintenance
Organization” on Foreign Part 145 Acceptance as a User Guide for inspectors and applicants.
This procedure is intended to assist the aviation industry in Jordan and the foreign maintenance
organizations to process the applications for obtaining CARC acceptance for a foreign
maintenance organization.

All maintenance organizations and continuing airworthiness organizations shall report to

CARC, the state of registry and the TC Holder for the design of the aircraft or component
identified by an approved 145 organization that has resulted or may result in an unsafe condition
that hazards seriously the flight safety as detailed in CARC Guidance Procedure AWS 30
“Technical Occurrence Reporting Guidance Procedure”.

Part 6
Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization Approval
This procedure describes how CARC will handle the issuance/renewal of the Continuing
Airworthiness Management Organization (CAMO) approval, the continuing safety oversight and
resolving findings of non-compliance, changes and variations to the approval, and, if necessary and
in the interest of safety, revocation, suspension and limitation of an approval.
The approval process shall be managed in accordance with the guidelines of this procedure,
provisions of Jordan Civil Aviation Regulations Part M, Subpart G and the related AMC and GM.
In case of commercial air transport, and pursuant to Part M, Subpart G for the aircraft it operates,
CAMO shall be approved as part of the air operator certificate issued by CARC. The CAMO
approval process at all phases shall be coordinated with Flight Operations Standards Department of
CARC (FOSD). AWSD Team Leader (TL) for CAMO approval is assigned the duties of AWSD
focal point to coordinate the CAMO certification activities with the AOC certification team.
AWSD CAMO approval process is documented in CARC Form 18-0317 “CAMO Approval
Process Form”
In case of an applicant for AOC, all activities of CAMO certification process are coordinated with
FOSD AOC certification team in accordance with the guidelines addressed in form 18-0317
“CAMO Approval Process Form”.
The Director Airworthiness Standards has overall responsibility for all aspects of CAMO
Approvals. He is assisted in this task by the Chief Division.
AWSD will determine by whom, and how the certification activities and audits shall be conducted,
e.g. it will be necessary to determine whether one large team audit or a short series of small team
audits or a long series of single man audits are most appropriate for a particular situation.
The day to day supervision of CAMO is the responsibility of the assigned Airworthiness Inspector
who will also act as TL in the event that a team is deemed to be the most appropriate approach for
the particular situation.
The assigned Inspector/Team Leader is therefore responsible for the following:
- Reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant;

- Liaison with the applicant during all phases of the process;
- Arranging for an audit of the applicants proposed organization in coordination with the
Chief Division;
- Arranging for formal acceptance in writing of the Key Management Personnel;
- Producing an audit report including details of all noncompliance findings;
- Communicating the audit findings to the applicant and ensuring all noncompliance findings
are rectified;
- Maintaining detailed records of all correspondence, reports, meetings, etc. in relation to the
application and continued surveillance;

- Making a recommendation report as to the suitability of the organization for approval to the
Chief Division;
- Ensure that the required procedures are adhered to; and
- Ensuring that all correspondence, audit reports etc. are compiled on completion of the
investigation and submitted to the technical library In-charge for final filing,
- In case of an AOC, coordinating CAMO certification activities with the AOC Certification
team,
When acting as the Team leader, the Inspector must also be capable of performing the following
additional duties:
- Organizing the work of the team with respect to planning, areas to be audited, work sharing
between team members, collecting evidences, reporting, etc.;
- Identifying particular areas of expertise which may be required for special activities and
arranging the availability of an Inspector within AWSD with expertise in that particular
area;
- Presenting to the applicant the process which will be applied during all phases of the
investigation;
- Reporting to the Chief Division any problems encountered during the process and proposing
resolutions of these issues.
6.3 Initial application/enquiry
The application usually starts with a letter of intent submitted to CARC. The letter of intent will
usually be reviewed by the Legal, the Competition and Corporate Control, the Airworthiness
Standards (AWSD) and the Flight Operations Standards (FOSD) departments of CARC.
Acceptance of the initial application is coordinated with all CARC involved departments of in the
applicable certification activities.
6.4 Investigation for Initial Acceptance
AWSD and other involved departments of CARC, as appropriate, will liaise with the applicant and
seek additional information or clarification as may be required. The applicant will be oriented to
review the applicable regulations, AMC, GM and procedures.
Applicant orientation to review the applicable regulations, AMC, GM and procedures may be
conducted during an informal meeting with the applicant.
When the letter/applicant initial submittal is accepted by CARC, and if the applicant is selected to
proceed with the approval process, then the applicant will be entitled to proceed to Phase-I of the
certification process.
In case of an applicant for AOC, the acceptance of the initial application is coordinated with all
other involved departments of the certification activities.
This phase starts with an informal meeting in CARC facility. The Accountable Manager of the
proposed organization should participate in this meeting. This meeting will include the following
activities:

- General presentation by the applicant, outlining the proposed activity, details of aircraft
types, availability of the required technical staff with qualifications relevant to the planned
work scope, maintenance arrangements, subcontracted maintenance arrangements etc.;
- Description by AWSD representatives of the investigation process, which will be followed
in assessing the applicant for approval.
During the meeting, the prospective applicant will also be provided with the following documents:
- CARC Form 18-0135 “Pre-application Statement of Intent (PASI)”, or in case of an

applicant for AOC, CARC Form 28-1003 “Prospective Operator’s Pre-Assessment
Statement (POPS)”,
- CARC Form 18-0299 “Application for an Approval in accordance with JCAR Part M
Subpart G”,
- A copy of JCAR Part M “Continuing Airworthiness Management”,
- CARC Form 18-0305 “Recommendation Report for Continuing Airworthiness Management

Organization Approval”,
- Compliance Checklist template for Part M, Subpart G,
- CARC Form 18-0285 “Management Personnel Qualification”.
The applicant will be given one month (30 days) to prepare and submit the application. A copy of
minutes of this meeting shall be kept on file in AWS Department.
When the PASI or, as applicable, POPS is submitted and found satisfactory, the applicant will be
entitled to proceed to Phase-II of the certification process.
In the Formal Application Phase, the applicant shall submit the following documents:
- Completed application form CARC Form 18-0299,
- Completed CARC Form 18-0285 attached with CV’s of key Management Positions,
- The Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition (CAME),
- Completed Compliance Checklist with Part M, Subpart G,
- The operator's aircraft maintenance program(s),
- The aircraft technical log,
- Identification where base and scheduled line maintenance is to take place,
- Where appropriate the technical specification of the maintenance contracts between the
operator and Part-145 approved maintenance organization,
- Arrangements for all base and scheduled line maintenance,
- Details of any contracted maintenance including arrangements for engine and component
support,
- Applicable fees settlement in accordance with fees and charges regulations as published by
CARC.
CARC does not expect the documents listed above be submitted in a completed state with the initial
application for grant or change since each may require approval in its own right and may be subject
to amendment as a result of AWSD assessment during the technical investigations. Draft documents
should be submitted at the earliest opportunity so that investigation of the application can begin.

Grant or change cannot be achieved until CARC is in possession of all required documents.
At the time of application, the operator should have arrangements for all base and scheduled line
maintenance in place for an appropriate period of time, as accepted to CARC. The operator should
establish further arrangements in due course before the maintenance is due.
Base maintenance contracts for high-life time checks may be based on one time contracts, when
CARC considers that this is compatible with the operator’s fleet size.
When above information and documentation are received, AWSD assigned Inspector(s) will
conduct cursory review of these information and documentation, i.e. the formal application and its
attachments, for general acceptance and to check that attachments address the required information
and are of an appropriate quality.
During this phase, AWSD CT will liaise with the applicant as deemed necessary. If the formal
application package is incomplete or otherwise unacceptable, CARC will inform the applicant,
provide details of the deficiencies and advice on the resubmission of the formal application. If the
information in the formal application package is considered acceptable by the certification team, a
formal application meeting with the applicant will be scheduled.
A formal application meeting will be conducted between the certification team and all the key
management personnel of the applicant, with the objective of ensuring that, applicant has submitted
formal application and formal application attachments, review the approval process and establish a
common understanding on the future procedure for the certification process.
In particular, the formal application meeting should confirm that the management background
information satisfies regulatory requirements. It should address any errors or omissions in the
application package, resolve any scheduling date conflicts and agree on a process for revising event
dates, reinforce the communication and working relationships between CARC certification team
and applicant personnel and, finally, determine the general acceptability of the formal application
package.
It should be understood that acceptance of the formal application package by CARC does not
constitute acceptance or approval of any of the attachments which will be subjected to later in depth
review. The identification of significant discrepancies during the in depth review may require
further meetings between appropriate members of CARC certification team and the applicant
personnel.
Subsequent to the formal application meeting and subject to the successful acceptance of the
application package, CARC will provide the applicant with a letter acknowledging receipt and
acceptance of the formal application.
The outcome of this phase is the general acceptance of the Formal application and its attachments.
During this phase, the AWSD Inspector(s) assigned to the investigation will conduct:
a) Detailed review of the CAME, using Part-3 of CARC Form 18-0305 PART-M SUBPART G
APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT, for compliance with the requirements of JCAR
Part M Subpart G including in particular;

- The Management Organization Structure, including the Accountable Manager and senior
Management Personnel;
- Verification that the Accountable Manager has signed the Corporate Commitment Statement
in the CAME;
- The proposed work scope and capability of the organization;
- The availability of the required technical staff with qualifications relevant to the planned
work scope;
- The facilities available for the planned management activity;
- The procedures for the provision of the required technical publications, including regulatory
and type certificate holder documentation etc;
- The procedures for the provision and control of technical documentation;
- Sub Contracted arrangements, if applicable;
- The Quality System.
b) Review of the operator's maintenance program(s); the maintenance program, including a

maintenance schedule, will detail the maintenance requirements for individual aircraft and shall be
reviewed by AWSD assigned inspector for compliance with the requirements specified in M.302,
the associated AMC and GM.
c) The technical log; the operator’s technical log system will be reviewed by the AWSD Inspector
to ensure compliance with M.306, the associated AMC and GM. The technical log should contain:
- information about each flight, necessary to ensure continued flight safety;

- the current aircraft certificate of release to service;
- the current maintenance statement giving the aircraft maintenance status of what scheduled
and out of phase maintenance is next due except that CARC/AWSD may agree to the
maintenance statement being kept elsewhere;
- all outstanding deferred defects rectifications that affect the operation of the aircraft;
- Any necessary guidance instructions on maintenance support arrangements.
d) The aircraft maintenance arrangement(s); Arrangements will be reviewed for identification

where base and scheduled line maintenance are to take place, and arrangements for engine and
component support. The contract(s) shall be established in accordance with Part-M and the
associated AMC and GM.
e) Compliance Checklist with Part M, Subpart G; It will be reviewed for complete contents and
means of compliance established by the organization to comply with the applicable regulatory
requirements.
The assigned Inspector(s) will liaise with the applicant and seek clarification, amendment to the
CAME and or other relevant documentation so as to fully comply with JCAR Part M Subpart G
requirements.
The outcome of this phase is an initial acceptance of the CAME and the formal application
attachments for initial audit of the organization and the managed airworthiness activities, tasks and
functions. The applicant will be advised of this fact in writing, and arrangement(s) will be made to
conduct physical audit of the organization and the managed continuing airworthiness processes.

During this phase, the applicant is required to demonstrate that its organization is provided with
necessary qualified staff, equipment and facilities, and has the necessary set up to discharge its
responsibility for ensuring that the aircraft remain in an airworthy condition for the duration of their
operational life, this is referred to as managing the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft.
It is assumed that, in the case of an applicant seeking authority to operate leased aircraft registered
in a different State, suitable arrangements have been made between the State of the Operator and
the State of Registry regarding responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft.
Further detailed guidance on the maintenance control aspects of an air operator certification, as well
as approval of a Continuing Airworthiness Management and the preparation of maintenance-related
aspects associated with an AOC, is contained in JCAR Part M, the associated AMC and GM.
AWSD assigned Inspector(s) should determine that the structure of the applicant's CAMO is set
forth, clearly delineating duties and responsibilities for all key personnel including the manager(s)
for engineering and maintenance. The names of all incumbents should be listed. The details of the
organizational structure should be included as part of the CAME and, if necessary, also
promulgated separately.
The Inspector checks that a detailed CAME is available for use and guidance of maintenance and
continuing airworthiness personnel and it is kept current and up to date, and it is furnished to all
organizations and persons to whom it has been issued. During the inspection, AWSD assigned
Inspector determine that the provisions of the CAME are being followed in practice. The Inspector
also ascertain the efficiency and promptness of the amendment service and determine that all
instructions for continued airworthiness issued by the organization responsible for the type design
and the States concerned are promptly assessed and circulated to all those who need such
information.
AWSD determine how individual audits are conducted and assign an audit team or an individual
Inspector depending on the nature and scale of the organization. The inspection/audit of the
organization is conducted using CARC Form 18-0305 “PART-M SUBPART G APPROVAL
RECOMMENDATION REPORT” or the relevant parts thereof.
The extent of the audit is determined by the nature and the scale of the organization’s continuing
airworthiness management activity. When determining the scope of the audit and which activities of
the organization will be assessed, the privileges of the organization will be taken into account. The
TL and the assigned Inspector(s) determine the areas to be audited and select particular product line
so that the audit can be concentrated on one type only for a full compliance check. Dependent upon
the result, the second type may only require a sample check against those activities seen to be weak
on compliance for the first type.
During the accomplishment of the audit, the auditing Inspector(s) will ensure that the following
procedure is followed, to ensure that the organization is fully aware of any findings identified.
- The auditor(s) should always be accompanied by a Senior Technical Representative of the

organization throughout the audit. This is usually the Quality Manger;
- A meeting with the Accountable Manger shall be convened at least once during the
investigation for approval to ensure that he/she fully understands the significance of the
approval and the reason for signing the exposition commitment of the organization to
comply with the procedure specified in the exposition;

- The auditor(s) shall inform the Senior Technical Representative/Quality Manager of the
organization at the end of the audit visit of all findings identified during the audit;
- In the event that the auditor(s) are unsure about compliance in a particular organization, the
auditor(s) will verbally inform the organization about possible non compliance at the time of
the audit and the fact that the situation will be reviewed further within CARC before a final
decision is made.
6.4.5 CARC Review of Findings
On completion of the physical audit of the organization, the assigned Inspector/Team Leader will
compile all documentation relating to the audit and ensure that:
- Findings are recorded on the form (CARC Form 18-0305 “PART-M SUBPART G
APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT”) with a provisional categorization as a Level
1 or Level 2;
- Provisional finding levels are reviewed with the Chief and AWSD Team members, adjusted if
necessary and changed from provisional to confirmed;
- If, as the result of the review AWSD finds that the organization is in compliance, a verbal
confirmation is given to the organization;
- All findings of confirmed non-compliance is confirmed in writing to the organization within
two weeks of the audit visit;
- Liaison is maintained with the organization on the required corrective action to address the
findings;
- Detailed records of all correspondence, reports, meetings, etc. in relation to the approval
process are compiled;
- All findings must be corrected before the approval can be issued.
When the assigned Inspector/Team Leader is satisfied that the corrective actions are satisfactory
and that the organization is now ready for approval, the following additional steps will be taken in
order to progress to Phase V.
- A final report is prepared using CARC Form 18-0305 “PART-M SUBPART G APPROVAL
RECOMMENDATION REPORT” together with minutes of meetings, correspondence, and
related documents. The report includes the date each finding was cleared together with a
reference to the correspondence received from the organization regarding clearance of the
finding.
- Verify that all applicable fees have been paid.
- Conducting quality review of documentations, if satisfactory, the Chief Division signs the
recommendation.
- The completed final “PART-M SUBPART G APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION

REPORT”/CARC Form 18-0305 for issuance is submitted to CARC Chief Commissioner
with three copies of the approval certificate, CARC Form 18-0014 for Chief Commissioner
Signature.
6.4.6 Phase V Issue of Approval
When the Chief Commissioner signs the approval certificate (CARC Form 18-0014), AWSD team
arranges for:

- Formal acceptance in writing (approval) of the CAME;

- Formal acceptance in writing of the Management Personnel (CARC Form 18-0285). In the
case of the accountable manager, approval of the continuing airworthiness management
exposition containing the accountable manager’s signed commitment statement constitutes
formal acceptance, once CARC has held a meeting with the accountable manager and is
satisfied with its results;
- Three copies of the approval certificate CARC Form 18-0014 duly signed by the Chief
Commissioner or his/her deputy. One copy is for AWSD records and the other two are sent to
the organization.
- Updating the register of Approved Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations,
- Presentation of all documents for filing in the technical library.
The CAMO approval is indicated by means of a statement containing the following information:
- Air Operator Certificate number, in case of an AOC,
- Name of the operator, in case of an AOC
- Type(s) of aircraft for which the continuing airworthiness management organization has been
approved,
- Reference identification of the operator’s approved maintenance program(s),
- Reference identification of the approved continuing airworthiness management exposition,
- Any limitations imposed by CARC on the approval,
- Any subcontractors working under the organization’s quality system.
6.5 Continued Oversight and renewal of approvals
CARC/AWSD shall keep and update a program listing for each Part M, Subpart G approved
continuing airworthiness organizations under its supervision, the dates when audit and renewal
audit visits are due and when such visits were carried out.
Application for renewal is submitted to CARC of at least 45 days before the expiry date of the
approval and shall include the application form (CARC Form 18-0299) and items with changes, as
applicable, of the formal application attachments as specified in Para. 6.4.2. Changes approval shall
be processed in accordance with Para 6.6 below.
According to the program;

- Each organization shall be completely audited at periods not exceeding 24 months.
- A relevant sample of the aircraft managed by Part M, Subpart G approved organization shall
be surveyed in every 24 month period. The size of the sample will be decided by AWSD
based on the result of prior audits and earlier product surveys.
- All findings shall be confirmed in writing to the organization.
- CARC shall record all findings, closure actions (actions required to close a finding) and
recommendations.
- A meeting with the Accountable manager shall be convened at least once every 24 months to
ensure he/she remains informed of significant issues arising during audits.
Where CARC/AWSD has decided that a series of audit visits are necessary to arrive at a complete
audit of an approved continuing airworthiness management organization, the program should
indicate which aspects of the approval will be covered on each visit.

AWSD determine the areas to be audited and select particular product line so that the audit can be
concentrated on one type only for a full compliance check. Dependent upon the result, the second
type may only require a sample check against those activities seen to be weak on compliance for the
first type. Subsequent sample(s), if necessary, follow the same criteria
It is recommended that part of an audit concentrates on two ongoing aspects of Part M, Subpart G
approval, namely the organization’s internal self-monitoring quality reports produced by the quality
monitoring personnel to determine if the organization is identifying and correcting its problems and
secondly the number of concessions granted by the quality manager.
At the successful conclusion of the audit(s) including verification of the exposition, an audit report
should be completed by the auditing Airworthiness Inspector(s) including all recorded findings,
closure actions and recommendation. CARC Form 18-0305 “PART-M SUBPART G APPROVAL
RECOMMENDATION REPORT” should be used for this activity.
Credit may be claimed by the Airworthiness Inspector(s) for specific item audits completed during
the preceding 23 month period subject to four conditions:
- the specific item audit should be the same as that required by Part M, Subpart G latest
amendment, and
- there should be satisfactory evidence on record that such specific item audits were carried out
and that all corrective actions have been taken, and
- the Airworthiness Inspector(s) should be satisfied that there is no reason to believe standards
have deteriorated in respect of those specific item audits being granted a back credit;
- the specific item audit being granted a back credit should be audited not later than 24 months
after the last audit of the item.
When an operator sub-contracts continuing airworthiness management tasks all sub-contracted

organizations should also be audited by CARC/AWSD at periods not exceeding 24 months (credits
per above criteria are permitted) to ensure they fully comply with Part M, Subpart G. For these
audits, CARC Airworthiness Inspector should always ensure that he/she is accompanied throughout
the audit by a senior technical member of the operator. All findings should be sent to and corrected
by the operator.
When performing the oversight of organizations that hold both Part M, Subpart F and Part M,
Subpart G approvals, CARC should arrange the audits to cover both approvals avoiding duplicated
visit of a particular area.
When during audits or by other means evidence is found showing non-compliance to the Part-M
requirement, CARC shall take the following actions:
- For level 1 findings, immediate action shall be taken by CARC/AWSD to revoke, limit or
suspend in whole or in part, depending upon the extent of the level 1 finding, the continuing
airworthiness management organization approval, until successful corrective action has been
taken by the organization.
- For level 2 findings, CARC/AWSD shall grant a corrective action period appropriate to the
nature of the finding that shall not be more than three months. In certain circumstances, at the

end of this first period, and subject to the nature of the finding CARC/AWSD can extend the
three month period subject to a satisfactory corrective action plan.
Action shall be taken by CARC/AWSD to suspend in whole or part the approval in case of failure
to comply within the timescale granted by CARC.
If during aircraft surveys or by other means evidence is found showing noncompliance to Part-M
requirement, CARC shall take the following actions:
- for level 1 findings, CARC/AWSD shall require appropriate corrective action to be taken
before further flight and immediate action shall be taken to revoke or suspend the
airworthiness review certificate and subsequently the certificate of airworthiness.
In addition and in case of an aircraft registered in another State, CARC should inform the
owner/operator and the competent authority of the State of Registry of any potentially affected
aircraft in order that corrective action can be taken to ensure possible unsafe conditions on
these aircraft are corrected before further flight.
- for level 2 findings, the corrective action required by the CARC/AWSD shall be appropriate
to the nature of the finding.
If the root cause of the finding identifies a noncompliance with any Subpart or with another Part of
regulations, the noncompliance shall be dealt with as prescribed by the relevant Part.
6.6 Changes
Whereas, CARC shall monitor and control changes to the approved organization, the approved
continuing airworthiness management organization, in accordance with M.713 and before such
changes take place, shall notify CARC of any proposal to carry out any of changes specified
therein.
Change/Variation approval process is documented in CARC Form 18-0318 “CAMO

Change/Variation Approval Process Form”
Depending on the nature and the extent of a proposed change, CARC will apply the applicable
elements of the initial approval process requirements for a change. CARC may prescribe conditions
under which the approved continuing airworthiness management organization may operate during
such change unless it determines that the approval should be suspended until a change is approved.
The assigned Airworthiness Inspector(s) will liaise with the organization and other CARC involved
department regarding the change approval process, any special conditions which may be applied
and also arrange for the accomplishment of any audit(s) required to establish compliance with Part
M requirements and ensure that:
- The relevant applicable parts of CARC Form 18-0305 “Part-M Subpart G Approval
Recommendation Report” are completed, including all recorded findings, closure actions
and recommendations;
- Appropriate liaison is maintained with the organization as required in relation to audit

findings and the closure of the same;

- Letters of approval, certificates, etc. as may be required as part of the change are prepared
for distribution within CARC and to the organization concerned.
- Records are maintained of all correspondence, reports, etc and ensuring that these are
delivered to the technical library for filing.
6.7 CAME Amendments
CARC policy is such that all amendments to the CAME shall be assessed and approved by
CARC/AWSD.
Exposition status sheet is recommended to be maintained within the AWSD to control all
amendments to the CAME including:
- The date when amendments are received and;

- The date when amendments are approved.
The assigned Inspector to the continuing airworthiness management organization is responsible for
monitoring the status of the CAME’s amendments, which are controlled as follows:
- The organization submits proposed amendments to CARC;
- The assigned Inspector will review the proposed amendment and if necessary arrange for an
audit of the organization;
- When all Part M requirements are deemed satisfactory, the assigned Inspector will arrange
to formally advise the organization of the CAME amendment approval in writing;
- The exposition status sheet, as applicable, is updated to reflect the amendment;
- Records of correspondence, reports, etc. are delivered to the technical library for filing.
6.8 Revocation, suspension and limitation of an approval
CARC/AWSD shall:
- suspend an approval on reasonable grounds in the case of potential safety threat, or;
- suspend, revoke or limit an approval pursuant to Para. 6.5 provisions; when evidence is
found showing non-compliance to the Part-M requirement and in case of failure to comply
within the timescale granted by CARC for successful corrective action been taken by the
organization.
6.9 Records
CARC has established a record keeping system in relation to the continued oversight activities of
Part M approved organizations. This system provides for adequate traceability of the process to
issue, continue, change, suspend or revoke each certificate.
The records for the oversight of Part M organizations includes as:
- The application for an organization approval;

- The organization approval certificate including any changes;
- A copy of the audit program listing the dates when audits are due and when audits were
carried out;
- CARC continued oversight records including all audit records;
- Copies of all relevant correspondence;
- Details of any exemption and enforcement actions;
- Any report from other competent authorities relating to the oversight of the organization;
- Organization exposition or manual and amendments;
- Copies of any other document directly approved by CARC.
The minimum retention period for the above records shall be six years.
The minimum records retained for the oversight of each aircraft shall include, at least, a copy of:
- Aircraft certificate of airworthiness;
- Reports of airworthiness reviews and recommendations;
- All relevant correspondence relating to the aircraft;
- Details of any exemption and enforcement action(s);
- Any document directly approved by CARC.
The records specified above shall be retained until two years after the aircraft has been permanently
withdrawn from service. CARC primarily utilizes a hard copy record system, but a computerized
office administration system is used as an aid.
6.10 Exemptions
CARC may grant exemptions from requirements laid down in the JCAR Part M Regulation in the

6.11 Special Operations Approvals
The special operations approvals airworthiness related procedures for PBN, MNPS, RVSM,
ETOPS, AWO and EFB are detailed in AWSD Guidance Procedure AWS 03 “Operational
Directives with a Continuing Airworthiness Impact”, as amended.
All maintenance organizations and continuing airworthiness organizations shall report to CARC,
the state of registry and the TC Holder for the design of the aircraft or component identified by an
approved 145 organization that has resulted or may result in an unsafe condition that hazards
seriously the flight safety as detailed in CARC Guidance Procedure AWS 30 “Technical
Occurrence Reporting Guidance Procedure”.

Part 7
Maintenance Training Organization (MTO) – JCAR Part 147
Subpart A
7.1 Scope
This section establishes the administrative requirements to be followed by CARC official in charge
of the application and the enforcement of the technical requirements of Part 147.
Any maintenance training organization approval issued by CARC in accordance with CARC
previous requirements and procedures and valid at the time of entry into force of this Part shall be
deemed to have been issued in accordance with this Part. For this purpose, by derogation from the
provisions of JCAR 147.130(b), level 2 findings associated with the differences between CARC
previous Part 147 and this Part shall be closed within one year.
Ongoing basic training courses complying with the requirements applicable before this Part applies
may be continued for a maximum period of thirty six months after the date by which Part 147
applies.
7.2 Authority designation
(a) AWSD is a designated authority within CARC with allocated responsibilities for the issuance,
continuation, change, and issue recommendation for suspension or revocation of Part-147
certificates. CARC established documented procedures and an organizational structure.
(b) Resources. AWSD is appropriately staffed to carry out the requirements of Part 147.
(c) Procedures. AWSD established procedures detailing how compliance with Part 147 is
accomplished contained in AWS guidance procedure No. 44 and 45 as applicable. The procedures
shall be reviewed and amended as necessary to ensure continued compliance.
(d) Qualification and training. All staff involved in approvals related to Part 147 must:
1. Be appropriately qualified and have all necessary knowledge, experience and training to
perform their allocated tasks.
2. Have received training and continuation training on Part-66 and Part-147 where relevant,
including its intended meaning and standard.
7.3 Record keeping
(a) CARC shall establish a system of record-keeping that allows adequate traceability of the
process to issue, renew, continue, vary, suspend or revoke each approval.
(b) The records for the oversight of maintenance training organizations shall include as a
minimum:
1. the application for an organization approval.
2. the organization approval certificate including any changes.
3. a copy of the audit program listing the dates when audits are due and when audits were
carried out.
4. continued oversight records including all audit records.
5. copies of all relevant correspondence.
6. details of any exemption and enforcement actions.
7. any report from other competent authorities relating to the oversight of the organization.
8. organization exposition and amendments.

(c) The minimum retention period for the paragraph (b) records shall be four years.
7.4 Exemptions
(a) CARC may exempt an MTO from any rules issued by CARC in accordance with Chapter 6 –
Petitions of CEO Order 1-2013 (General Rule Making Procedures).
(b) All exemptions shall be temporary and limited to specific requirements, and specific period upon
which compliance with the relevant exempted rule or an Acceptable Means of Compliance
(AMCs) is required.
(c) The petition for exemption shall be submitted to CARC at least 30 days before the proposed
effective date of the exemption and shall be made in a form and a manner established by CARC.
(d) In cases of emergency or when CARC agrees otherwise and good cause is shown in the petition,
the exemption may be submitted immediately.
(e) exemptions granted in accordance with CEO Order 1-2013 (General Rule Making Procedures
shall be recorded and retained by CARC.
Subpart B
Issue of an Approval
7.5 Scope
This Subpart provides the requirements to issue or vary the maintenance training organization
approval.
7.6 Procedure for approval and changes to the approval
(a) Upon receipt of an application, CARC shall:

1. review the maintenance training organization exposition; and
2. verify the organization’s compliance with the requirement of Part-147.
(b) All findings identified shall be recorded and confirmed in writing to the applicant.
(c) All findings shall be closed in accordance with point 147..130 before the approval is issued.
(d) The reference number shall be included on the approval certificate in a manner specified by
CARC.
7.6.1 General
The certification of Approved Maintenance Training Organizations in accordance with Part-147

regulations involves monitoring of maintenance training activities and inspection of training
organization facilities throughout Jordan in a consistent manner. It is essential the processes provide
for quick and efficient response to requests emanating from the MTOs for purposes of variations to
their approvals.
CARC has applies the maintenance training organization approval procedure policy as it is
described herein. This policy is based on and satisfies the conditions and provisions of the Part-147
regulation. Furthermore, the intents of this policy are to assure standardization of procedures and
methods employed within CARC system.
CARC has established guidance procedure on this regard (AWS GP 44 as amended).

This user guide is designed to be used by:
 Part-147 MTO - To assist them in the certification of Approved Maintenance Training
Organizations in accordance with Part-147 regulations

 CARC - As a comparison document for Certification process for approval.
The user guide is provided for guidance only and should be followed by each organization to
demonstrate how they comply with Part-147. It is the responsibility of the organization to
ensure compliance with the regulation.
7.6.2 Authority
Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission has designated the Airworthiness Standards Department as
the responsible Department for the Maintenance Training Organization approvals.
7.6.3 Initial Issue of a Part -147 Approval
The following procedure is intended to ensure that CARC carries out the approval process in a
consistent and standard manner ensuring that the process is in accordance with the JCAR
regulations and related AMC & GM.
7.6.4 Pre-Application Meeting
Once an applicant’s letter of intent has been submitted to CARC, the latter will schedule a pre -
application meeting. This meeting will take place at CARC’s premises and the applicant will be
given the «MTO Application Package Documents» in electronic which includes the following:
♦ Application Form (CARC Form 18-0012) as ameded
♦ Part-147 Conformance Document
♦ Management Personnel Acceptance Form (CARC Form 18-0285) as amended
♦ A list of the required Manuals/Documents for submission
A briefing is also given to the applicant during this meeting on the MTO certification process,
applicable regulation, including guidance on the completion of the application form and
conformance document. The Chief of the MTO Division, or his delegate, is the person responsible
to conduct and offer guidance at this pre-application meeting. The applicant should be represented
(at a minimum), by the Accountable Manager and the Training Manager.
It should also be explained to the Applicant at this time the need for an appropriate
person designated as the focal point for the company during the MTO certification process. One of
the functions of this person will be to assure that all the findings issued by CARC are directed to,
and properly addressed by the appropriate personnel within the company. It will be much more
efficient for the certification team to track the status of findings and comments through this person
rather than several persons responsible for specific areas. Another function of this company
coordinator will be to arrange the on-site visits and ensure that the appropriate company personnel
will be present and available.
The following documents/guidance lists will be given:

♦ CARC Application Form 18-0012 – Annex 5
♦ CARC Form 18-0285.
♦ Conformance Document Part-147– Annex 6.
The above Manual/Documentation list are available on-line to all interested applicants.
During any meeting with the applicant minutes of meetings should be kept and recorded to the
relevant files.

To summarize, during this meeting the following should be accomplished:

♦ specify the regulation(s) and the applicable procedures
♦ clarify the requirements bound in the MTOE
♦ clarify the associated requirements (data, tool, training material, staff)
♦ determine if the applicant's business activities justify the grant of Part-147Approval
♦ Appoint a date for the Application & Application Meeting
7.6.5 Application & Application Meeting
CARC receives application as described below and determines if it is for Initial or Variation
Renewal of MTO Certificate.
For the initial issue of a Part-147 MTO Certificate, the applicant must submit the completed CARC
Form 18-0012 (shown in Annex 5) and CARC Form 18-0285.
Upon receipt of the application documentation, and prior to the Application Meeting, a
“Certification Team” is assigned to oversee the MTO certification process of the applicant by the
Airworthiness Standard Department Director.
The composition of the team will be two Airworthiness Inspectors (one Maintenance and one
Avionic). In any case, the knowledge, experience and background of the persons assigned will be
considered in the appointment of the team and matched to the complexity of the MTO activity.
In order for the Application to be considered officially submitted, the above CARC Forms must be
submitted along with all required Manuals/Documentation as described in detail in paragraph 7.6.6 .
If complete, the application will be attempted to be processed within 90 days. The 90 day period
will not commence until all the documentation has been submitted. The quality of the
documentation submitted will also have an effect on the 90 day period.
The Application Meeting, which officially starts the MTO certification process, should not be held
unless it is assured that all the documents required with the application will be completed and ready
to be officially submitted at least three days prior to the Application Meeting. The Application
Meeting should be cancelled and rescheduled if the application documentation is not complete as
stated.
The Application Meeting is only held if the appropriate personnel, as mentioned above, are present.
CARC's personnel in attendance will be the Chief of the MTO Division and the assigned
Certification Team. It is also desirable for the Airworthiness Standards Director to attend if
available.
The main objectives of the Application Meeting are to:
♦ Introduce the Organization’s Management personnel to the CARC MTO Certification

Team.
♦ Assure that the applicant’s maintenance team understands the MTO certification process.
♦ Answer any questions the Applicant may have.
♦ Distribute the documents/manuals to the appropriate maintenance members of the
Certification Team.
♦ Discuss and agree upon the target dates for the various phases outlined in the
Certification Schedule,

7.6.6 Submission of Required Manual(s)/Documentation
REF: 147.140, AMC 147.140
The potential MTO Organization’s management personnel should submit the following:
♦ Completed CARC Form 18-0012 as amended.
♦ Completed CARC Form 18-0285 as amended.
♦ Maintenance Training Organization Exposition (MTOE) (Ref. Appendix I AMC 147)
♦ Part-147 Conformance Document
7.6.7 Management personnel qualification – review
The qualifications of the Accountable Manager and the other Managers are described in detail as
follows:
I. Accountable Manager
The Accountable Manager has to be accepted by CARC in written form.

There are no special qualifications required for the acceptance of the Accountable Manager.
He must have only the corporate authority of ensuring that all training commitments can be
financed and carried out according to Part-147.
II. Training Manager
The Training Manager could also be the Accountable Manager. The Training Manager must have:
a. Knowledge requirements
• Technical Engineering degree

• Administrative skills
• Communication skills
• Knowledge and understanding of the relevant Aviation Regulations (CS-Definitions, Part-
147, Part-66, Part-145, Civil Aviation Law No. 41 (as amended) and the MTOE
procedures.
• Knowledge of Training Instructional techniques.
• Knowledge of Aviation techniques.
b. Experience requirements
• 3 years active as trainer in a technical training department
III. Training Quality Manager
The Training Quality Manager must have:
a. Knowledge requirements
• Knowledge and understanding of the relevant Aviation Regulations (CS-Definitions, Part-

147, Part-66, Part-145, Civil Aviation Law No. 41 (as amended) and the MTOE
procedures
• Administrative skills
• Communication skills

• attended an internal audit training.

• attended a Quality System or Quality Management Training
b. Experience requirements:
• two years experience in a quality function.
IV. Examination Manager
The Examination Manager must have:
a. Knowledge requirements:
• Communication skills.
• Personal integrity.
• Knowledge and understanding of the relevant Aviation Regulations and MTOE
procedures.
b. Experience requirements:
Two years experience in performing examinations.
V. Examiners/Instructors/Assessors
The examiner/instructor/assessor must have:
a. General Knowledge requirements for Examiners/Instructors/Assessors:
• Communication skills.
• Personal integrity.
• Knowledge and understanding of the relevant Aviation Regulations and MTOE
Procedures.
• Continuation Training according to Part-147 Paragraph 147.105 (h).
b. Additional Experience requirements for Examiners:
• Performing of three examinations under the supervision of the examination manager.
c. Additional Knowledge requirements for Instructors:
• Knowledge in instructional techniques.

• Knowledge in the subject to be trained.
d. Additional Knowledge Requirements for Practical Assessors:
• Aircraft Type Training (ATA 104 Level 3) on the A/C Type to be assessed.
• one year Aircraft Maintenance Experience.
VI. Acceptance process for CARC Form 18-0285

A CARC Form 18-0285 is necessary for the Training Manager, Training Quality Manager,
Examination Manager and Examiners.
7.6.8 Manual(s)/Documentation Review
The review of the submitted Manual(s)/Documentation is carried out by the Airworthiness

Certification Team to assess the Part-147 & AMC requirements.
This is conducted by a general review of the Part-147 documents/manual(s) submitted by the

applicant with the application. This review provides the applicant with timely initial feedback and
assesses the applicants understanding of the requirements.
7.6.8.1 Part-147 Conformance Document
The Certification Team will evaluate the Part-147 Conformance Document. If the
Conformance Document needs further work, it should be returned to the MTO together
with the comments summary as an attachment to an Audit Finding Form.
7.6.8.2 Organization’s MTOE
The Certification Team will evaluate the MTO Organization’s MTOE in order to establish that it
complies with Part-147.140. The evaluation will be conducted in conjunction with the Part-147
Conformance Document to record queries, topics to be checked on audit and unsatisfactory items. If
the MTOE needs further work, it should be returned to the MTO together with the comments
summary as an attachment to an Audit Finding Form,
The MTOE must include the subject headings (as applicable) listed in Appendix I of the AMC and
reflect the preferred procedures. The CARC Inspector(s) is required to establish that the procedures
specified in the exposition are in compliance with the intent of Part-147 and then to establish if
these procedures are, actually, intended for use. Exposition approval will be accomplished when all
items identified in CARC Form 18-0022 Part 3, have been identified and evaluated as satisfactory.
Note:
CARC has established Guidance Procedure under No. AWS48 on Part-147 MTOE Checklist and
Guidance.

 Part-147 MTO - To assist them in the production and/or maintaining of their own MTOE
 CARC - As a comparison document for MTOEs submitted to them for approval; and
The user guide is provided for guidance only and should be customized by each organization to
demonstrate how they comply with Part-147. It is the responsibility of the organization to ensure
compliance with the regulation. The organization may choose to use another format as long as all
the applicable sections of the regulation are addressed and cross-referenced.
7.6.9 Corrective Actions
Manuals/Documentation submitted by the MTO applicant are checked by reviewing the completed
Part-147 Conformance Document that has been submitted. If any noncompliance’s are found and/or
if corrections are needed, the assigned Inspectors will notify in writing the Applicant of the non-
compliance’s and/or corrections. A copy of this notification letter should also be inserted in the
MTO’s Certification file appropriate section (correspondence). On the basis of the findings against
the MTOE, the MTO is responsible for the relevant corrective actions / modifications required by

CARC. The certification team members must properly track each item in order to ensure its
rectification. Any findings raised will be processed in accordance with para. 7.10 of this Manual. A
specific approval letter will be issued for the MTOE Manual.
7.6.10 On-Site Inspection(s)
During the on-site inspection phase the facilities, personnel, training and examinations procedures,
instructional equipment of the MTO organization are assessed for acceptability. The following steps
can be used as a general guideline:
♦ Determine the areas to be audited and who will do what.
♦ From the Conformance Document and MTOE pick specific items and subjects for the
Audit/schedule, the provisional number of days, plan travel arrangements (if applicable), etc.
♦ Notify the applicant of the start of the audit and request an opening meeting with the
attendance of the Accountable Manager.
7.6.10.1 Opening Meeting
The purpose of the opening meeting is to:

♦ Introduce the CARC Certification Team to the MTO’s Management
♦ Briefly explain the purpose of the certification procedure - to comply with CARC
requirements.
♦ Describe the process to be followed
♦ Explain the Audit Finding Forms and the Leveling of Findings
♦ Clearly explain that the level of the finding is provisional until endorsed by the CARC
Airworthiness Director
♦ Explain that all Level 1 & 2 findings must be closed before the approval can be granted
(Initial approval)
♦ Request the Closing Meeting - This will either be a debrief at the end of the on-site audit
or a specific meeting set for a few days later when the report has been produced and can be
handed to the MTO.
7.6.10.2 On-Site Audit
During the on-site Audit:

 Each member of Team to be accompanied by a MTO representative.
 Follow the Audit Plan and audit issue findings the Part-147 requirements.
 Follow-up on any Audit Findings that have been issued against the MTOE.
 Progressively complete CARC Form 18-0022, Parts 2 & 4 recording any findings against
the sub-paragraph of the requirement and the applicable area of the audit. Draft any
Finding Forms and provide provisional copy to the MTO.
 Team Leader to monitor progress of audit against the plan and timescale what was
projected.
 Confirm place, time and date for Closing Meeting.
7.6.11 Inspection Results & Closing of Findings
7.6.11.1 Team Report
 To be produced in the standard format identifying both positive and negative features of
the organization.

 Comments in the report can be subjective but any finding of non-compliance with the
requirement must be objective and supported by an audit finding attached as an appendix
to the report.
 The report must be signed by the Team and endorsed by the CARC Chief Division
Airworthiness Division.
Note:
A comprehensive Team Report is required to be submitted only during the initial certification of an
MTO.
7.6.11.2 Closing Meeting
 Thank organization for co-operation during the audit.

 Review the content of the report highlighting both positive and negative aspects.
 Review the specific findings that must be resolved and closed before the approval.
 Provide the opportunity for queries and clarification.
 Confirm the process of follow-up and closure of the findings.
7.6.11.3 Assemble CARC Certification File
At this stage the following documents should be placed in the MTO’s Certification File:
 Part-147 Conformance Document
 Completed CARC Form 18-0022, Parts 2, 3 and 4 with the closure date endorsed as
'Before Approval' - see Annex 7
 CARC Form 18-0012
 CARC Form 18-0285
7.6.12 Audit Follow-up (if Applicable)
The MTO organization responds to findings (if applicable) and resubmits the Audit Finding
Form(s) with either the full corrective action described on the form or cross referenced as an
attachment. Certification Team evaluates the closures, where necessary, carrying out a follow-up
audit and closes the findings, completing also CARC / Form 18-0022, Part 4
7.6.13 Preparation for Issue of the Approval (Part-147)
Once the Certification Team is satisfied that all findings are closed for the applicable items, as
described above, they will prepare the Certification folder to be presented to the AWSD Director.
The following is a list of the Certification folder contents:
♦ Completion of the Documentation Check Sheet
♦ CARC Form 18-0012
♦ CARC Form 18-0285 and copy of acceptance letter
♦ MTOE approval letter and file record
♦ CARC Form 18-0022, Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
♦ Team Report and Audit Finding Closure documents
♦ Draft of letter to MTO forwarding CARC Form 18-0122
7.6.14 Quality Check
The Team Leader will present the Certification File to the Chief Division, or in his absence to the
Director of Airworthiness Standards, who will carry out the 'quality check'. This must include a
review of all documents and CARC Forms from the initial application through to the drafted CARC
Form 18-0022. At this time the bi-annual provisional monitoring plan for the MTO is reviewed and
approved.
7.7 Issue of the Approval
Following the Quality Check, the CARC CEO will sign and stamp the approval certificate and
associated letters and pass them back to the AWSD Director for processing. The maintenance
training organization approval certificate format shall be as detailed in Appendix II.
7.7.1 CARC Certification File
The completed Certification File is then placed in the allocated space in the library.
7.7.2 Variation of –Part-147 Approval (Ref:147.105)
MTO organization, issued an approval in accordance with Part-147 wishing to alter any of the
elements listed below, must submit a CARC Form 18-0012 or an application in the form of a letter
to CARC.
A Part-147 approval variation application, received from the MTO, is required for any of the
following reasons:
 Name or address (location) of the principal place of business of the MTO has changed.
The organization submits a new application as a matter of urgency stating that only the
name of the organization has changed including a copy of the organization exposition with
the new name. On receipt of the application and the organization exposition, CARC will
reissue the approval certificate valid only up to the current expiry date.
 Any change(s) to the scope of approval (training/examination approval schedule) of the
MTO.
 A change of accountable manager requires the maintenance training organization to submit
such fact to CARC as a matter of urgency together with the amendment to the Accountable
Manager exposition statement.
 A change of any of the senior personnel specified in Part 147.105(b) or the examination staff
in 147.105 (e) requires the maintenance training organization to submit a Form 285 in respect
of the particular person to CARC. If satisfied that the qualifications and experience meet the
standard required by Part-147, CARC will indicate acceptance in writing to the maintenance
training organization.
 A change in the maintenance training organization’s exposition requires CARC to establish
that the procedures specified in the exposition are in compliance with the intent of Part-147
and then to establish if these are the same procedures intended for use within the training
facility.
 Any additional basic or aircraft type training courses requires the maintenance training
organization to make a new application to CARC together with the submission of an amended
exposition. For basic training extensions, an additional sample of new examination questions
relevant to the modules associated with the extension being sought will be required to be
submitted
CARC will follow the procedure of paragraph 7.6.6 in so far as the change affects such procedures
unless it is satisfied that the maintenance training organization has a well-controlled procedure to
qualify such change when it is not necessary to conduct a full audit.

Note:
A name change alone does not require CARC to audit the organization, unless there is evidence that
other aspects of the maintenance training organization have changed. The complete or partial re-
organization of a training organization will require the re-audit of those elements that have changed.
For this purpose the MTO should submit the affected manual(s)/Documentation for evaluation by
CARC. The Part-147 approval variation process follows the steps of the initial Part-147 approval as
described in para. 7.6.5.
7.7.3 Update AWSD Database
Certain information received by the MTO applicant in support of his/her application shall be
entered in the AWSD System during the appropriate certification procedure steps. This information
includes, but is not limited to, MTO organization’s address, phone numbers, base location, Senior
Managers names, MTO scope of work, etc. In addition, all findings from the various certification
steps will also be entered into the computerized system for tracking and historical record purposes.
This information is kept up to date by including all subsequent changes (if any) to the Part-147
Approval
7.8 Continued validity procedure
a. Each organization shall be completely audited for compliance with this Part-147 at periods
not exceeding 24 months. This shall include the monitoring of at least one training course and
one examination performed by the maintenance training organization.
b. Findings shall be processed in accordance with 147.130.
c. PART 147 AMTO organizations are audited by CARC at periods not exceeding 24 months to
ensure compliance with Part 147 requirements, as per 147.120(a).
d. CARC Part-147 inspections are scheduled regularly every year and are included in the AWSD
Audit plan in accordance with Guidance and Administrative Material 18-2511on the
Establishment of an Annual Surveillance Program For Airworthiness.
e. List of Records related to MTOE (Part 147) Approval and Oversight
1. The application for approval.

2. CARC Form 18-0122, CARC Form 18-0012, CARC Form 18-0022
3. Copy of annual monitoring audit plan
4. Survey program and related records
5. Copies of all relevant correspondence including CARC Form 18-0285
6. Copies of any extension, exemption, and enforcement action (separate file)
7. Any kind of report from other Authorities relating to oversight of the Organization
8. Organization’s exposition (MTOE) and related amendments. Generally, any document
directly approved by CARC should be retained as above
7.9 Findings
(a) Failure to complete the rectification of any level 1 finding within three days of written
notification shall entail revocation, suspension or limitation by CARC, of the maintenance
training organization approval in whole or in part.
(b) Action shall be taken by CARC to revoke, limit or suspend in whole or part the approval in
case of failure to comply within the time scale granted in the case of a level 2 finding.

7.10 Reporting audit findings
7.10.1 General
Audit Finding form(s) are used to record audit findings that result during an inspection. It is
important that this form is filled out completely.
7.10.2 Procedure
The Audit Finding form is to be filled out during the inspection so the Assigned Inspector
performing the inspection must have an adequate number of AF forms handy before the inspection
begins.
For Findings showing non-compliance to the specific inspection requirements, CARC/ AWSD
shall take the following actions:
For Level 1 findings, immediate action shall be taken to revoke, limit or suspend in
whole or in part, depending upon the extent of Level 1 finding, the maintenance training
organization approval, until successful corrective action has been taken by the organization.
Level 2: Level 2 finding is any non-compliance with Part 147 requirements which could lower the
safety standard and possibly hazard the flight safety. For the Level 2 findings, the responsible
Inspector shall grant a corrective action period appropriate to the nature
of the finding that shall not be more than three (3) months. In certain circumstances, at the end of
this first period and subject to the nature of the finding, the three month period may be extended,
subject to a satisfactory corrective action plan.
Subpart C
7.11 Revocation, suspension and limitation of the maintenance training organization approval
CARC shall:
(a) suspend an approval on reasonable grounds in the case of potential safety threat; or
(b) suspend, revoke or limit an approval pursuant to 147.130.
If the certificate holder does not correct the deficiency within the established deadlines, the
Airworthiness Inspector should immediately inform the Director through the responsible division’s
chief with a recommendation that enforcement action shall be taken against the certificate holder's by
either imposing a fine or the privileges be temporarily or permanently withdrawn or restricted. If,
after careful review of all circumstances involved and following necessary coordination and
consultation within the CARC Commissioners Counsel, there is agreement on the need to impose a
fine, suspend or revoke the certificate holder's privileges, the Airworthiness Department should
officially handover the case to the Commissioner Council, thereafter inform the certificate holder in
writing summarizing both the proposed action and the reasons for it.
Note:
CARC has established guidance and administrative procedure on this regard incorporated in the
guidance 18-2510, item 3
Subpart D
7.12 Training in-progress inspection
Considerations of Training-In-Progress Evaluation:

1. Give the notice of your intention to conduct an inspection to training facility manager or
PART 147 AMTO accountable and Manager.
2. Conduct an entry meeting with the training facility Accountable Manager or PART 147
AMTO assigned Quality Manager:
 Review the scope of the inspection.
 Agree on the allocation of any training facility staff or resources that may be needed
for the inspection.
3. Carry out the inspection, in a way that causes a minimum of disruption to the trainees,
using the appropriate checklist. Remain tactfully passive in classrooms and training areas.
Do not:
 Ask questions of the instructors or trainees during training sessions.
 Distract instructors or students in any way.
 Displace existing students from their allocated seats or positions.
4. Conduct a short exit meeting with the training management:

 Briefly report the findings of the inspection.
 Make arrangements for any follow-up action.
5. Report Inspection Results.
Subpart E
Type rating training Course Approval other than those conducted by a Part-147 approved
maintenance training organization.
7.13 Scope
The purpose of this procedure is to outline the requirements for approval of type training courses
other than those conducted by a Part-147 approved maintenance training organization.
According to Appendix III of Part-66.45 (b) specifies that Part-66 Category B1, B2 and C
certifying staff are required to hold an appropriate aircraft type rated Part-66 aircraft maintenance
licence prior to the grant of a Part-145 certification authorization on a specific type.
Part-66.45 (c) additionally specifies that ratings will be granted following satisfactory completion of
the relevant category B1, B2 or C aircraft type training approved by CARC or by an appropriately
approved Part-147 maintenance training organization.
All aircraft type training courses, other than those carried out by a Part-147 training organization
approved to conduct type training, must be approved by CARC and the approval application will be
processed in accordance with this procedural guide lines.
The approved type-training course includes theoretical course elements/examinations acceptable to
CARC.
However the type rating endorsement on the Part-66 licence also requires the performance of
practical training/assessment elements acceptable to CARC as well. The practical
training/assessment element may either be part of the approved type training course or be performed
directly by the Part-145 approved maintenance organization. Type training courses will be approved
in accordance with Part-66
Appendix III.

7.14 Application
Applications for approval of aircraft type training courses, other than those to be conducted by a
Part-147 approved training school, should be made to the Airworthiness Standards Department. A
copy of the course syllabus should accompany the application form. The processing of an
application, including auditing of the course although a timely process takes effort and time to
complete and consequently organizations requiring approval of type training courses should make
the application well in advance of the anticipated start-up date.
7.15 Training provisions and environment
The experience and qualifications of the person in charge of the training course and his/her deputy
shall be such as to ensure that the training will be conducted in a satisfactory manner.
The number, qualifications and experience of the course instructors, examiners and practical
assessors, shall be appropriate to the intended course.
Facilities provided are to be adequate to ensure protection from the prevailing weather and of
overall size to cope with all planned training and examinations on any particular day.
They should be fully enclosed and isolated from other facilities for theory and examinations
purposes. They should be maintained at a light, noise and temperature/humidity level such that
students are able to concentrate on their studies or examinations without undue distraction or
discomfort.
Access should be provided to appropriate facilities containing examples of the aircraft and/or
engine type. Adequate office accommodation should be provided for the instructor(s), examiner(s)
and practical assessor(s).
Adequate storage facilities should be available for examination papers and training records. The
students should have access to a library containing all current technical material appropriate to the
training course.
7.16 Course Syllabus
The course will normally be divided into a mechanical course for airframe and engine and an
avionics course. Limited avionics training will be included in the mechanical course. The electrical
system will be included in both categories.
The type training will include and fully justify training corresponding to the levels specified in Part-
66 Appendix III.
The training should give adequate detailed theoretical knowledge of the aircraft, its main parts,
systems (all existing systems in accordance Part-66 Appendix III paragraph 2.1 where applicable)
equipment, interior and applicable components. Relevant in-service problems, service bulletins and
instructions should also be covered, including training in the systems in use for technical manuals
and maintenance procedures. Knowledge is also required of relevant inspections and limitations as
applicable to the effects of environmental factors such as cold and hot climates, wind moisture etc.
7.17 Theoretical knowledge examinations
Knowledge examinations may be conducted at the end of each distinct phase of training or at the
end of the entire course. The examinations must be conducted using multi-choice questions as
outlined in Part-66 Appendix III paragraph 3.
On completion of the course the student should be able to:

a. Demonstrate by knowledge examination a detailed understanding of applicable systems

(in accordance with ATA 100), their operation and maintenance.
b. Ensure safe certification of line maintenance , inspections and routine work according to
the maintenance manuals and other relevant instructions and tasks as appropriate for the
type of aircraft, for example trouble-shooting, repairs, adjustments, replacements, rigging
and functional checks such as engine runs, etc, if required.
c. Correctly use all technical literature and documentation for the aircraft.
Examination questions in use shall be sufficient to give full coverage of the phase or section of the
syllabus and shall be appropriate to the end of course standard.
The number of questions is determined by the duration of the course and must comprise as a rule, a
minimum of one question for each hour of instruction, subject to a minimum of two questions
Syllabus subject.
The course provider must compile three question papers for each examination. One paper will be
chosen on the day of the examination by the examiner, other than the course instructor. Where the
course provider does not provide an examiner the examination papers must be selected on the day
of the examination by the contracting Part-145 organization’s Quality Manager or his/her
nominated deputy.
7.18 Practical training
Practical training should be performed in accordance with Part-66 Appendix III paragraph 2.2 and
shall include hands on training in maintenance of the aircraft, rigging, adjustments, replacement of
line replaceable units, trouble-shooting, rectification of minor defects and functional tests of
systems.
The practical training should comprise of a period of 4 months for certifying staff with no recent
recorded previous practical experience of aircraft of comparable construction and systems,
including the engines, but this can be reduced to a minimum of two weeks for certifying staff with
such previous experience.
A program of structured on-the-job training (OJT) may be prepared to satisfy this practical training
requirement.
Practical training may be carried out at any Part-145 approved maintenance organization or at the
manufacturers or a combination of both but such training will form part of the particular aircraft
type training either approved directly by CARC or approved via the Part-147 requirement.
The training shall include practical hands-on training and theoretical training as appropriate for each
task nominated. Satisfactory completion may be demonstrated by an examination and/or workplace
assessment.
An authorized instructor must conduct the training and an authorized practical assessor must
conduct the practical assessment. Qualifications and experience standards for the instructors and
practical assessors must be established.
7.19 Practical assessment
Practical assessments should be conducted in accordance with AMC 66.45(d) paragraph 6. An

assessed pass for each student should be granted when the practical assessor is satisfied that the
student has demonstrated the capability to use the relevant tools/equipment/test equipment as
specified by the tool/equipment/test equipment manufacturer and the use of maintenance manuals as

specified by the Type Certificate holder in that the student can carry out the required
maintenance/inspection/testing
without missing any defects, can readily identify the location of components and is capable of
correct removal/fitment/adjustment of such components, as applicable.
The student should also show an appreciation of the need to ensure clean working conditions and
the observance of safety precautions for the student and the product. In addition the student should
demonstrate a responsible attitude in respect of flight safety and airworthiness of the aircraft.
7.20 Conduct of course
Lecture notes, diagrams and other instructional material shall be substantially accurate at the time
they are handed out. Where an amendment service is not provided a written warning must be given
to this effect.
7.21 Organization quality integration
The contracting Part-145 approved maintenance organization must conduct adequate audits of the
training course and the examinations to ensure that the course is conducted in accordance with the
requirements of Part-66. Any findings that affect the standards of the training course must be
notified to CARC. Adequate records of the audits must be maintained.
7.22 Course records
Records of course attendance and examination results shall be kept in a safe location for at least five
years following completion of the course.
7.23 Course certificates
Certificates should be awarded to the successful students on completion of the course. The
certificate details must be agreed by CARC and should include the following;
 Certificate number
 Name plus the location and date of birth of the student.
 Name of the course provider (Organization or other contracted provider under Organization’s
Quality System).
 The airframe/engine combination, whether the engine is included in the course or not (this is
important for Part-66 type rating purposes as the type rating refers to an airframe/engine
combination).
 Part-66 Category, i.e. A, B1 or B2, if applicable.
 Subjects i.e. airframe/engine/electrical /avionic.
 Clear indication of the standard and level of the course i.e. in accordance with Part-
66.Appendix III.
 Duration of the course including the start and end dates.
 Specific elements of the course to which the certificate relates i.e. knowledge only, practical
training only or knowledge and practical training,
 Other relevant details particular to the course such as APU type(s).
7.24 Approval
CARC will approve the course by letter that will contain any specific conditions or additional
provisions if necessary.

Note:
CARC has established Guidance Procedure under No. AWS 47 on Type rating training Course
Approval other than those conducted by a Part-147 approved maintenance training organization.

 Part-145 and Part MF - To assist them in seeking approval of aircraft type training
courses.
 CARC - As guidance procedure to outline the requirements for approval of type training
courses other than those conducted by a Part-147 approved maintenance training
organization.; and it is the responsibility of the organization to ensure compliance with the
regulation.
Subpart F
Foreign Part 147 Acceptance/Type Training
There is a need for CARC to accept ATOs that are located outside the Hashemite Kingdom of
Jordan. This approach is driven by cost considerations or simply because the national market
does not support certain types of specialized aviation training locally. However, there is no
difference between the approval of training organizations based in Jordan and those based in
another Contracting State. The principles and procedures that are described in both ICAO
Annex 1 and the Manual on the Approval of training Organizations (ICAO Doc 9841) fully
apply to foreign-based ATOs.
In practice, there are difficulties linked to the fact that Jordan may not have the necessary means
to ensure proper oversight of ATOs located abroad. To overcome these difficulties, Jordan has
found it convenient to rely on the approval and oversight system of the host State to issue the
acceptance by accepting the approval given by another State to fully understand the conditions
and the regulatory basis of the original approval. This may lead to the establishment of
supplementary conditions.
Note:
CARC has established Guidance procedure under No. AWS 45 on Foreign Part 147
Acceptance/ Type Training as a User Guide for Applicants.
This procedure is intended to assist the aviation industry in Jordan and the foreign maintenance
training organizations /Type Training to process the applications for obtaining CARC
acceptance for a foreign maintenance training organization/Type training organization of the
approval issued by the foreign authority.

Part 8
Permit to Fly
This procedure describes how CARC will handle issuance, renewal and continued validity of the
Permit to Fly in respect of aircraft already registered on Jordanian civil aircraft register.
A Permit to Fly is generally issued when a certificate of airworthiness is temporarily invalid, e.g. as
a result of a damage, or when a certificate of airworthiness cannot be issued since that aircraft does
not meet, or has not been shown to meet, the applicable airworthiness requirements but the aircraft
is capable of performing a safe flight under a defined conditions and restrictions.
Flight conditions arc differentiated such as:
1) Flight conditions related to the safety of the design, e.g.:

a) the aircraft does not conform to an approved design; or
b) an Airworthiness Limitation, a Certification Maintenance Requirement or an Airworthiness
Directive has not been complied with; or
c) the intended flight(s) are outside the approved envelope.
2) Flight conditions not related to the safety of the design, e.g.:

a) production flight testing for the purpose of conformity establishment;
b) delivery/export flight of an aircraft, the design of which is approved;
c) Demonstrating continuing conformity with the applicable airworthiness requirements of an
aircraft to qualify or re-qualify for a (restricted) certificate of airworthiness.
8.2 Application for a Permit to Fly
An application for a Permit to fly shall be made in a form and manner established by CARC and
shall include the following:
1) A completed CARC Form 18-0118 "Application for Airworthiness Certificate"; the

applicant completes blocks I, ll, VI and VlI, as applicable,
2) A completed CAR Form 18-0311 "Application for Issuance of a Permit to Fly and
Approval of Flight Conditions", and
3) A completed CARC Form 18-0310 "Approval of Flight Conditions for a Permit to Fly"
8.3 Review and assessment
The technical investigations for the approval of flight conditions and the issuance of flight permit
will vary depending on the established flight conditions as related to the safety of the design or not
related to the safety of design, as well as, the purpose of the permit.
Whenever, an application is received by CARC/AWSD, the application will be forwarded to the
Chief Division, who will then assign Airworthiness Inspector or a team of Inspectors, as
appropriate, to initiate the technical investigation on which CARC/AWSD will base its decision to
issue, to amend or to refuse the issuance of the Permit to Fly and the approval of the proposed flight
conditions or changes thereto.
The assigned inspector(s) will conduct assessment on following:
1) All required forms are properly completed, signed and submitted by the applicant,

2) The proposed night conditions against the substantial documentations provided by the
applicant are appropriate,
3) The aircraft and its airworthiness records to ensure that the aircraft is capable of safe flight
under the specified conditions and restrictions,
If the application cannot be accepted due to just cause or any of information or requirement is
missing, the applicant will be informed in writing, by means of a formal letter agreed upon with
Chief Division and authorized by Director AWS of the decision of rejection or in order to:
• Submit the correct data,

• Submit the missing information,
• Submit additional data, and/or
• make any necessary inspections or tests for ensuring that the aircraft is capable of safe
flight under the specified conditions and restrictions, and, as applicable, the specified
conditions and restrictions are compensating for the non-compliance with the airworthiness
requirements.
When the review and the assessment are completed, the assigned Inspector (s) in coordination with
the Chief Division will make determination if a consultation is needed with FOSD concerning the
established flight conditions/Restrictions. If FOSD finds that additional conditions are necessary to
be established and/or the established conditions are to be amended to ensure the aircraft is capable
of safe flight, AWSD will instruct the applicant to do so.
8.4 Approval of Flight Conditions/Restrictions and issuance of a Permit to Fly
When the application is found to be satisfactory, the flight conditions and the associated permit to
fly will be approved and issued by CARC:
1) the assigned inspector or team of inspectors issue the "Statement of Technical Satisfaction",
complete CARC forms as appropriate. prepare the certificate and the covering letter to the
applicant,
2) Chief Division makes the final review, endorse the "Statement of Technical Satisfaction"
and make sure that all CARC forms are properly completed and signed,
3) The assigned inspector make sure that:
a) AWSD records are updated,

b) The Permit to Fly is sent to the applicant, which shall at least include:
• The expiration date,

• The clause "For non-commercial flights only”,
• The clause "not valid for use in foreign airspace unless validated by the foreign CAA
whose airspace will be over-flown", and
• The approved flight conditions/restrictions
8.5 Coordination process with CARC Air Clearances concerning issuance of a landing/or
over flight permit to a foreign registered aircraft with a Permit to Fly issued by that State
Whenever an application is submitted to CARC Air Clearances for a landing permit in Jordanian
Airports or over flight Jordanian Territories with a foreign registered aircraft issued a Permit to Fly
by that State, the application should be coordinated with Airworthiness Standards Department
(AWSD), Air Clearances shall request the applicant to submit the following documentations:

(1) The certificate of registration ,

(2) The Purpose of the Flight ,
(3) The foreign Authority issued Permit to Fly and the approved Fight Conditions and Limitations ,
(4) The flight itinerary,
(5) The contact details of the applicant ,
(6) Any other information considered necessary by the AWSD after review of requirements in items
1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above.
Before granting an authorization for such flight, Air Clearances submit the documentations in items
1 through 6 to AWSD for review.
AWSD conducts a technical review to establish that the aircraft is capable of safe flight under the
issued Permit to Fly and the approved Fight Conditions and Limitations, and may request the
applicant to submit additional justifications and substantiations to make this conclusion .
Additionally, AWSD may impose additional flight conditions and Limitations, as considered
necessary, on such flight, which if established, shall form part of the flight authorization that will
then be issued by the Air Clearances for that applicant.
When AWSD completes its review and finds that the elements 1 through 6 of the application are
appropriate and satisfactory, AWSD will issue a "Statement of Technical Satisfaction", this
statement will be sent to the Air Clearances with, as applicable, any established additional flight
conditions and limitations, who will then issue a special flight authorization for such flight. A copy
of the issued authorization shall be sent to AWSD for records.
8.6 Information to be entered into CARC Form 18-0311 “Application for Issuance of Permit
to Fly and Approval of Flight Conditions
The use of this form is required to enable CARC to process applications without undue delay. The
individual fields of the application form may be varied in size to allow entry of all required
information.
Field 1.1: enter your reference

Field 1.2: enter the name of the legal entity making the application
Field 1.3: enter registered business address; add postal address if different e.g. for mailing or billing
purposes
Field 1.4- 1.7: enter name, telephone, fax and e-mail of contact person for this application; in case
the purpose for the permit is 4.2 (15), the applicant must be the owner of the aircraft.
Field 2: tick box and attach a completed CARC Form 18-0310 "Flight Conditions for A Permit to
Fly
Field 3.1-3.3: Enter manufacturer, type/model, serial number and registration marks
Field 3.4: If the application for approval of flight conditions is related to an ongoing certification
project that has already been applied for, tick, as applicable, the dedicated boxes.
Field 4.1: Identify the duration until the Permit to Fly shall be valid; a standard Permit to Fly shall
be issued for a maximum of 12 months
Field 4.2:
(1) - Testing of new aircraft or modifications.
- Testing of new concepts of airframe, engine propeller and equipment
- Testing of new operating techniques.
(2) - Certification flight testing for Type Certification, Supplemental Type Certificates,
changes to Type Certificates or Technical Standard Order Authorization.
- Fligh ts for the purpose of noise measurements.
(3) Flights for training of crew that will perform design or production night testing before the
design approval and Certificate of Airworthiness (CofA) can be issued.

(4) For establishing conformity with the approved design, typically this would be the same
programme for a number of similar aircraft.
(5) Green aircraft ferry for follow on final production.
(6) Before the aircraft is sold and/or registered.
(7) Before the aircraft is registered in the State where the CofA will be issued.
(8) In the case of inspection flight test by the authority before the CofA is issued.
(9) Flights for the purpose of conducting market survey, sales demonstrations and customer crew
training with non-type certificated aircraft or aircraft for which conformity has not yet been
established or for non-registered aircraft and before CofA is issued.
(10) Flying the aircraft to an exhibition or show and participating to the exhibition or show before
the design approval is issued, or before conformity with the approved design has been shown.
(11) Ferry flights in cases where maintenance is not performed in accordance with approved
programmes, where an AD has not been complied with, where certain equipment outside the
Minimum Equipment List (MEL) is unserviceable or when the aircraft has sustained damage
beyond the applicable limits.
(12) Oversees ferry flights with additional fuel capacity.
(13) Training flight and positioning flight for this purpose are included.
(14) Flying an aircraft which has been shown to comply with all applicable airworthiness
requirements but not with environmental requirements for example due to weather constraints.
(15) For aircraft which cannot practically meet all applicable airworthiness requirements, such as
certain aircraft without TC holder (generically termed orphan aircraft,) or aircraft which have not
been shown to meet all applicable requirements. The option of a Permit to Fly for such an aircraft
should only be used if a certificate of airworthiness or restricted certificate of airworthiness cannot
be issued due to conditions which are outside the direct control of the aircraft owner, such as the
absence of properly certified spare parts.
Field 4.3: Give a short description of the non-compliance with the applicable airworthiness
requirements.
Field 6: Signature of an authorized representative of the applicant.
Field 7: To be filled in only by CARC.
8.7 Information to be entered into CARC Form 18-0310 (Approval of Flight Conditions for
a Permit to Fly)
The use of this form is required to enable CARC to process applications without undue delay. The
individual fields of the application form may be varied in size to allow entry of all required
information.
Field 1: name of organization providing the flight conditions and associated justifications.
Field 2: enter applicant reference.
Field 5: Add reference to the document(s) identifying the configuration of the aircraft. For
change(s) affecting the initial approval form and description of change(s). This form must be re-
issued.
Field 6: Please provide all justifications and make references to the document(s) justifying that the
aircraft (as described in 5.) can perform the intended flight(s) safely under the defined conditions or
restrictions. For change(s) affecting the initial approval form; reference(s) to additional
justification(s). This form must be re-issued.
Field 7: Details of these conditions/restrictions, or reference to relevant document, including
specific maintenance instructions and conditions to perform these instructions.

Flight conditions/restrictions are established to ensure the safe operations of the aircraft, namely:
a) the conditions or restrictions put on itineraries or airspace, or both, required for the
f1ight(s);
b) the conditions and restrictions put on the flight crew to fly the aircraft;
c) the restrictions regarding carriage of persons other than flight crew;
d) the operating limitations, specific procedures or technical conditions to be met;
e) the specific flight test programme (if applicable);
f) the specific continuing airworthiness arrangements including maintenance instructions
and regime under which they will be performed.
g) the method used for the control of the aircraft configuration. in order to remain within
the established conditions.
Field 8: Not to be filled in.
Field 11: Signature of an authorized representative of the applicant.
Field 12: To be filled in only by CARC.

Part 9
Personnel Licensing (Certifying Staff)
Subpart A
9.1 General
Conditions of issue for an Aircraft Maintenance License are specified in Air law (41) Article
32(b).With the implementation of Part 65 effective on January 1997, and Part 66 effective on 01
September 2013.
Part 66 shall enter into force on the day of the first of September 2013.
Certificates issued in accordance with Part-65 before Part 66 applies shall remain valid until they
are changed, suspended or revoked or till 31 December 2016.
9.2 Protected rights
Protected rights apply to any CARC maintenance license holder. Part 66 provisions ensure that the
existing license holders will not lose any privileges even with the implementation of the Part-66
licensing system.
For the purpose of applying Part 66, CARC shall be the authority designated by the Hashemite
Kingdom of Jordan to whom a person applies for the issuance of an aircraft maintenance license
(AML), as well as for the continuation, amendment, suspension or revocation of such licenses.
A Guidance Procedure for this purpose has been developed by CARC, in order to familiarize
personnel engaged in Personnel Licensing with conditions, key policies and practices to be followed
for issuing, granting and managing Aircraft Maintenance Personnel Licenses, hereafter AML,
according to Part 66 requirements, thus establishing procedures detailing how compliance with this
Part is accomplished.
These procedures shall also be reviewed and amended to ensure continued compliance.
In the event of a discrepancy or conflict between this chapter and Part 66 regulation, the regulation
shall always take precedence.
Note:
CARC has established guidance procedure under No. AWS 43 on Part-66 Licence Administrative
procedures for the application and processing.
9.3 Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission - CARC
(a) CARC is a designated authority with allocated responsibilities for the issuance, continuation,
change, suspension or revocation of aircraft maintenance licences.
This authority established an adequate organizational structure to ensure compliance with Part-66.
(b) Resources
CARC is appropriately staffed to ensure the implementation of the requirements ofPart-66.
(c) Procedures
CARC is established documented procedures detailing how compliance with Part-66 is
accomplished. These procedures shall be reviewed and amended to ensure continued compliance.

9.4 General Responsibilities of an Authorized Maintenance Licensing Inspectors
In accordance with the job descriptions and assignment, an authorized maintenance licensing
Inspector of the airworthiness standards department who has completed the basic training and a
minimum of 6 months OJT may be authorized in writing by chief commissioner to technically
review the applications and recommend the issue of AML, ratings and validations or any
combination of authorities.
General Overview – Duties, Functions and Responsibilities
The authorized maintenance licensing inspector provides Personnel licensing services to applicants
for the issue and/or renewal of Jordan civil aviation Licenses and Validations as follows:
 Provides licensing information to national aviation industry clients.
 Reviews applications prepared by the Licensing Officers and recommend the

issue or reject the issue, renewal, extension and amendment of all types of
aviation maintenance personnel Licenses.
 Inspecting personnel licensing documents including medical certificates and

foreign License validation certificates
 Providing clarification to management, and to the clients (Jordanian License and

foreign applicants), and to aviation industry personnel with regard to licensing
requirements, licensing policy decisions, and the application of licensing
standards.
 Inspecting approved Facilities, Maintenance Training Organizations, and other

aviation operators to confirm the correct application of Personnel Licensing
Regulations and Standards.
 Provides recommendations for penalties including License suspension for

contravention of regulations.
Knowledge
The work requires:
 Knowledge of the mandate, objectives, priorities, and operation of the Airworthiness

Standards Department.
 Knowledge of government guidelines regarding employee ethical conduct,

professional standards and codes of conduct.
 Knowledge of the rules and regulations and related policies, methods and procedures
to gather and organize data and collect pertinent application information for the issue
of AML Licenses and validations.
 Knowledge of the standards for issue of Licenses and Validations and knowledge of
the quality control of aviation documentation, including the evaluation of applications
against standards to detect anomalies and create corrective action plans.

 Knowledge of various computer software applications, Word, PowerPoint, electronic

mail, DOS and Windows File Manager, to prepare correspondence, reports and
presentations.
Skills
 This work requires analytical skills to read and apply personnel licensing regulations,
standards, instructions, directions and procedures for the assessment of applications for
the issue of personnel Licenses and validations of foreign Licenses.
 This work requires analytical skills to determine if conditions are inappropriate for the
issue of a personnel License or validations and to prepare either a recommendations
for special consideration or refusal to issue as required.
 The work requires listening, reading and writing skills to understand the needs of
clients for the resolution of specific problems and to understand the regulation,
instructions, policies and procedures of the Licensing Section and to develop work
plans, reports, letters, memoranda and other special projects.
 The work requires verbal and communication skills when performing day-to-day
activities, discussing issues with inspectors and staff and presenting briefings and
training programs.
 This work requires manual dexterity and eye/hand coordination to operate on a daily
basis a computer keyboard for inputting and processing data and the preparation of
reports and letters.
 The work requires remaining calm and impartial while providing information to
unhappy and upset clients (License applicants) who are often questioning decisions
regarding License restrictions or limitations due to non-compliance with regulations or
standards.
9.5 Authorized Maintenance Licensing Inspectors Training Program
This program should be in accordance with Chapter 4 of CARC Manual 4-2001on Specific Safety
and Security Oversight Personnel Training Requirements, para 4.1 Qualification of Airworthiness
Safety Oversight personnel.
9.6 Training File
To document the training completed by the authorized maintenance Licensing Inspectors, an

individual Personnel Training File has been established for each employee. This file is used as the
basis for the development of a training plan. A training file is opened for an employee at the
beginning of his or her employment and is retained by a specifically authorized person. Records of
training and course completion within the job functions as well as records of other training
completed outside of the Government can be retained on this file. Training records are kept by
CARC – Human Resources Department-Training section in accordance with CARC Manual 4-
2001.
9.7 Official Credential Card
Refer to section 1.6.

9.8 Access to Personnel Files and Computer Records
Information contained in personnel files and computer records is obtained and compiled in
accordance with the requirements of Jordanian Law and regulations.
Personnel files contain information about individuals and therefore access to these records is limited
to the personnel that have a direct need to access this information. The following guidelines
prescribe the access rights of CARC employees:
 Staff in the Personnel Licensing Section of CARC- access as required for the
completion of licensing and medical actions.
 Staff in the Flight Standards Branch - access as required for appointment of
delegates, investigations and licensing action.
 Other Staff in CARC as required with the approval of the Chief Commissioner.
 Investigative bodies of Jordanian Government as required for criminal
investigations or legal inquiries with the approval of the Chief Commissioner.
.
Individuals who are not employees of CARC must not have access to the personnel files and
computer records
9.9 Airworthiness Standards Department’s Equipment and Tools
Airworthiness Standards Department, authorized personnel licensing Inspectors have, as needed the
necessary tools to assist the staff to effectively accomplish their duties and responsibilities”
1. Continuing Airworthiness Regulations (Part M, Part 145, Part 147 and Part 66)
2. Access to ICAO document by having access to ICAO portrait
3. Technical Library
4. Guidance, instruction and Procedures
5. Photocopiers
6. Computers
7. Laptops/notebooks
8. Facsimile
9. Printing facilities
10. Cellular telephones
11. Internet/intranet
12. Cars
13. Vests
9.10 Test appeals and complains
A documented appeals process has been established and made available to test-takers and decision-
makers a t the beginning of the testing process in accordance with Chapter 7 – APPEALS
of CEO Order 1-2013 (General Rule Making Procedures).
An appeal request should be addressed to the special committee for test appeals and complain, with
suitable supporting data. The Committee will then review the case, often convening a review board
(consisting of relevant specialists) to provide expert advice and recommendation.
9.11 Record keeping
(a) CARC is established a system of record-keeping that allows adequate traceability of the
process to issue, revalidate, change, suspend or revoke each aircraft maintenance licence.

(b) These records shall include for each licence:

1. the application for an aircraft maintenance licence or change to that licence,
including all supporting documentation;
2. a copy of the aircraft maintenance licence including any changes;
3. copies of all relevant correspondence;
4. details of any exemption and enforcement actions;
5. any report from other competent authorities relating to the aircraft maintenance
licence holder;
6. the records of examinations conducted by CARC;
7. the applicable conversion report used for conversion;
8. the applicable credit report used for crediting.
(c) Records referred to in points 1 to 5 of point (b) shall be kept at least 5 years after the end of
the licence validity.
(d) Records referred to in points 6, 7 and 8 of point (b) shall be kept for an unlimited period.
9.12 Mutual exchange of information
CARC shall participate in a mutual exchange of information in the case of a potential safety threat
involving several States; the concerned competent authorities shall assist each other in carrying out
the necessary oversight action.
9.13 Exemptions
Subpart B
9.14 Issue of an Aircraft Maintenance Licence
This Subpart provides the procedures to be followed by CARC to issue, change or continue an
aircraft maintenance licence.
9.15 Scope
This subpart establishes the procedures including the administrative requirements to be followed by
CARC of the implementation and the enforcement of Part-66.
Under this Subpart, the issue of an aircraft maintenance licenses and ratings is based on applicants
meeting basic requirements prescribed in Part 66.
According to Part 66, the following basic requirements must be fulfilled, and these are:
* Age
* Training
* Knowledge
* Skill
* Experience
* Medical Fitness
* Prerequisites

Note:
CARC has established guidance procedure under No. AWS 43 on Part-66 Licence Administrative
procedures for the application and processing detailing all the requirements.
9.16 Application and Processing
Applicants may either apply personally at the Customer office by filling the appropriate forms or
they can send their applications by regular mail.
The applications get incoming document number.
All the correspondence is checked by the Customer office and is addressed to the relevant
Departments.
The Head of Section is addressing the applications, etc. to Inspectors, and have a computerized
system to monitor the processing of documents.
These procedures are applied with the aid the following tools:
A. Actions
The required licensing actions performed by both the applicant and the assigned licensing
Inspectors are recorded in an organized manner. The purpose of this is to provide an easy
reference for all activities that lead to the issue of a license, validation or other authorization.
The process has been divided into phases; at the completion of the phases, a verification
signature is added by the authorized CARC Inspector before the documents are presented to
the Licensing Manager for issue of the License or Validation or other authorization.
B. Application Form
The application form must be used for all initial and renewal license and validation
applicants. The authorized Inspector will process the applications by applying the current
Jordanian Civil Aviation Regulations and recording data and results in the Personnel
Licensing certification System. Copies of all decisions (i.e. documents issued or refusal to
issue), application forms and corresponded letters to the applicants are also to be maintained
on personnel filing system.
If there is any doubt about an applicant meeting the requirements for the issue of a license,
the problem must be taken the Head of Division or Director regarding difficult cases.
The following step by step procedures are to be followed when completing and processing
an application. The completion of these application forms is the applicant’s responsibility;
the Inspector will then review the completed application and take action set out under "Final
Licensing Action" below. The appropriate License or Validation application form must be
completed by the applicant.
If the application is satisfactory in all respects, Personnel authorized in accordance with the
Delegation of Authority provided to them should recommend the issue of license or
validation by dating and signing the application. Once the signature block has been
completed, the application shall be processed and forwarded to the licensing Unit for
License issue/ amendment , change and or validation and license issued with data entry
completed into the Personnel Licensing system.
9.17 Procedure for the issue of an aircraft maintenance licence by CARC.
(a) On receipt of CARC Form 18-0124 as amended and any supporting documentation, CARC
shall verify CARC Form18-0124 for completeness and ensure that the experience claimed
meets the requirement of Part-66.

(b) CARC shall verify an applicant’s examination status and/or confirm the validity of any credits
to ensure that all required modules of Appendix I have been met as required by Part-66.
(c) When having verified the identity and date of birth of the applicant and being satisfied that the
applicant meets the standards of knowledge and experience required by Part-66, CARC shall
issue the relevant aircraft maintenance licence to the applicant. The same information shall be
kept on CARC records.
(d) In the case where aircraft types or groups are endorsed at the time of the issuance of the first
aircraft maintenance license, CARC shall verify compliance with point 9.20.
9.18 Procedure for the issue of an aircraft maintenance licence via a maintenance
organization approved in accordance with Part-145.
(a) A maintenance organization approved in accordance with Part- 145, when authorized to carry
out this activity by CARC in accordance with approved MOE, may
(b) make recommendations to CARC regarding the application from an individual for an aircraft
maintenance licence so that CARC may prepare and issue such licence.
(c) Maintenance organizations referred to in point (a) shall ensure compliance with points 9.17
(a) and (b).
(d) In all cases, the aircraft maintenance licence can only be issued to the applicant by CARC.
9.19 Procedure for the change of an aircraft maintenance licence to include an additional
basic category or subcategory
(a) At the completion of the procedures specified in points 9.17 or 9.18, CARC shall endorse the
additional basic category or subcategory on the aircraft maintenance licence by stamp and
signature or reissue the licence
(b) CARC record system shall be changed and updated accordingly.
9.20 Procedure for the change of an aircraft maintenance licence to include an aircraft rating
or to remove limitations
(a) On receipt of a satisfactory completed CARC Form 18-0124 and any supporting
documentation demonstrating compliance with the requirements of the applicable rating
together with the accompanying aircraft maintenance licence, CARC shall either:
1. endorse the applicant’s aircraft maintenance licence with the applicable aircraft rating; or
2. reissue the said licence to include the applicable aircraft rating; or
3. remove the applicable limitations in accordance with Part 66.50.
CARC record system shall be changed and updated accordingly.
(b) In the case where the complete type training is not conducted by maintenance training
organization appropriately approved in accordance with Part-147, CARC shall be satisfied
that all type training requirements are complied with before the type rating is issued.
(c) In the case where the On the Job Training is not required, the aircraft type rating shall be
endorsed based on a Certificate of Recognition issued by a maintenance training organization
approved in accordance with part-147.
(d) In the case where the aircraft type training is not covered by a single course, CARC shall be
satisfied prior to the type rating endorsement that the content and length of the courses fully
satisfy the scope of the licence category and that the interface areas have been appropriately
addressed.
(e) In the case of differences training, CARC shall be satisfied that
(i) the applicant’s previous qualification, supplemented by

(ii) either a course approved in accordance with Part-147 or a course directly approved by
CARC, are acceptable for type rating endorsement.
(f) Compliance with the practical elements shall be demonstrated
(i) by the provision of detailed practical training records or a logbook provided by a
maintenance organization appropriately approved in accordance with Part-145 or, where
available,
(ii) by a training certificate covering the practical training element issued by a maintenance
training organization appropriately approved in accordance with part-147.
(g) Aircraft type endorsement shall use the aircraft type ratings specified by CARC which is
included in the AMC of Part 66 as amended.
9.21 Procedure for the renewal of an aircraft maintenance licence validity
(a) CARC shall compare the holder’s aircraft maintenance licence with CARC records and verify
any pending revocation, suspension or change action pursuant to point 9.34. If the documents
are identical and no action is pending pursuant to point 9.34, the holder’s copy shall be
renewed for 3 years and the file endorsed accordingly.
(b) If CARC records are different from the aircraft maintenance licence held by the licence
holder:
1. CARC shall investigate the reasons for such differences and may choose not to renew
the aircraft maintenance licence.
2. CARC shall inform the licence holder and any known maintenance organization
approved in accordance with Part-M, Subpart F or Part-145 that may be directly
affected of such fact.
3. CARC shall, if necessary, take action in accordance with point 66. 500 to revoke,
suspend or change the licence in question.
9.22 Procedure for the conversion of licences including group ratings
(a) Individual aircraft type ratings already endorsed on the 145 maintenance authorization shall
be considered on the licence and shall not be converted to new ratings unless the licence
holder fully meets the requirements for endorsement defined in Part 66.45 for the
corresponding group/sub-group ratings.
(b) The conversion shall be performed in accordance with the following conversion table:
1. for category B1 or C:
— helicopter piston engine, full group: converted to ‘full sub-group 2c’ plus the aircraft
type ratings for those single piston engine helicopters which are in group 1,
—helicopter piston engine, manufacturer group: converted to the corresponding
‘manufacturer sub-group 2c’ plus the aircraft type ratings for those single piston engine
helicopters of that manufacturer which are in group 1,
— helicopter turbine engine, full group: converted to ‘full sub-group 2b’ plus the
aircraft type ratings for those single turbine engine helicopters which are in group 1,
— helicopter turbine engine, manufacturer group: converted to the corresponding
‘manufacturer sub-group 2b’ plus the aircraft type ratings for those single turbine engine
helicopters of that manufacturer which are in group 1.
— aeroplane single piston engine — metal structure, either full group or manufacturer group:
converted to ‘full group 3’. For the B1 licence the following limitations shall be included:
composite structure aeroplanes, wooden structure aeroplanes and metal tubing and fabric
aeroplanes,

—aeroplane multiple piston engines — metal structure, either full group or manufacturer
group: converted to ‘full group 3’. For the B1 licence the following limitations shall be
included: composite structure aeroplanes, wooden structure aeroplanes and metal tubing
and fabric aeroplanes,
— aeroplane single piston engine — wooden structure, either full group or manufacturer
included: metal structure aeroplanes, composite structure aeroplanes and metal tubing and
fabric aeroplanes,
— aeroplane multiple piston engine — wooden structure, either full group or manufacturer
included: metal structure aeroplanes, composite structure aeroplanes and metal tubing and
fabric aeroplanes,
— aeroplane single piston engine — composite structure, either full group or manufacturer
included: metal structure aeroplanes, wooden structure aeroplanes and metal tubing and
fabric aeroplanes,
— aeroplane multiple piston engine — composite structure, either full group or manufacturer
included: metal structure aeroplanes, wooden structure aeroplanes and metal tubing and
fabric aeroplanes,
— aeroplane turbine — single engine, full group: converted to ‘full sub-group 2a’ plus the
aircraft type ratings for those single turboprop aeroplanes which did not require an aircraft
type rating in the previous system and are in group 1,
— aeroplane turbine — single engine, manufacturer group: converted to the corresponding

‘manufacturer sub-group 2a’ plus the aircraft type ratings for those single turboprop
aeroplanes of that manufacturer which did not require an aircraft type rating in the
previous system and are in group 1,
— aeroplane turbine — multiple engine, full group: converted to the aircraft type ratings for
those multiple turboprop aeroplanes which did not require an aircraft type rating in the
previous system;
2. for category B2:
— aeroplane: converted to ‘full sub-group 2a’ and ‘full group 3’, plus the aircraft type
ratings for those aeroplanes which did not require an aircraft type rating in the previous
system and are in group 1,
— helicopter: converted to ‘full sub-groups 2b and 2c’, plus the aircraft type ratings for
those helicopters which did not require an aircraft type rating in the previous system and
are in group 1;
3. for category C:
— aeroplane: converted to ‘full sub-group 2a’ and ‘full group 3’, plus the aircraft type
ratings for those aeroplanes which did not require an aircraft type rating in the previous
system and are in group 1,

— helicopter: converted to ‘full sub-groups 2b and 2c’, plus the aircraft type ratings for
those helicopters which did not require an aircraft type rating in the previous system and
are in group 1.
(c) If the licence was subject to limitations following the conversion process referred to
in Part 66.70, these limitations shall remain on the licence, unless they are removed
under the conditions defined in the relevant conversion report referred to in point
66.300.
9.23 Procedure for the direct approval of aircraft type training
CARC may approve aircraft type training not conducted by a maintenance training organization
approved in accordance with Part- 147, pursuant to point 1 of Appendix III to part-66. In such case
CARC shall follow a procedure specified in Subpart E of Chapter 7 to ensure the aircraft type
training complies with Appendix III of Part-66.
Subpart C
Examinations
9.24 General
This Subpart provides the procedures to be followed for the examinations conducted by CARC.
9.25 Examination Standard
I. General
 Annex 1 to the Chicago Convention broadly outlines the subjects of which applicants shall
demonstrate appropriate knowledge. In general and in accordance with ICAO Annex 1,
applicants for aircraft maintenance personnel licences must demonstrate knowledge in five
subjects.
 Annex 1 to the Chicago Convention requires that all applicants for licences shall
demonstrate an appropriate level of knowledge and skill and meet certain experience
requirements For example, the Basic knowledge for categories A, B1 and B2 are indicated
by the allocation of knowledge levels indicators (1, 2 or 3) against each applicable subject.
Category C applicants must meet either the category B1 or category B2 basic knowledge
levels.
 Basic Examinations questions have been developed by an external contractor in
accordance with a signed contract and provided to CARC , CARC Airworthiness
Inspectors review, revise, correct and update the questions periodically.
 The rapid increase in technology requires constant updating of staff knowledge. For
effective and fast integration of this knowledge, an effective examination data base and
examining system by computer is needed.
 Computerised based examinations allow CARC to use advanced elements and methods
to check the applicants. Especially in the area of technical training and examination
graphic elements and vivid representations instead of pure text.

 The use of multi-media elements and good database architecture will raise the quality of
the questions and the examinations.
II. Control-Software
In order to administrate the question bank also a program is needed. The main tasks are to
support the question design and the question management. It also must provide
examination pattern for written examinations and for computer based examinations. It
must not have any functionality to run an examination or to control the applicants’ license
data.
III. Question-Database
A question-database includes the entire information. It is the base of the

examination development and the controlling system. A well organized question-
bank is a fundamental prerequisite for the quality insurance of examinations.
IV. Principal requirements
(a) Questions must be written in Aviation language.

(b) Questions that require specialized knowledge of specific aircraft types should not
be asked in a basic licence examination.
(c) Multiple-choice question must have three alternative answers of which only one
must be the correct answer and the candidate must be allowed a time per module
which is based upon a nominal average of 75 seconds per question.
(d) The primary purpose of essay questions is to determine that the candidate can
express themselves in a clear and concise manner and can prepare a concise
technical report for the maintenance record, which is why only a few essay
questions are required. The candidate must be allowed a time per essay question of
20 minutes.
(e) The examination should measure clearly formulated goals. Therefore the field and
depth of knowledge to be measured by each question must be fully identified.
(f) For pass mark purposes, the essay questions should be considered as separate
from the multiple-choice questions.
(g) For a better descriptiveness and in order to remain close to reality, the use of
diagrams is particularly suitable.
(h) The use of abbreviations, and acronyms should generally be avoided. However,
where needed, only internationally recognized abbreviations, acronyms should be
used. In case of doubt use the full form, e.g. angle of attack = 12 degrees instead of
a= 12°. This means, for example, that only abbreviations commonly employed in
the specialist field are used, without an additional spelled-out explanation in
brackets.
(i) The use of units must follow the international rules and style conventions5.
(j) Questions must be referred to the syllabus, the category and the learning
objectives.
(k) The layout of question should be homogenous. Only one font may be used for the
question and the answer text. For the better optical distinction the additional

Airworthinesss Inspector’s Handbook
H CARC Order 18-9015
elements liike statemennts, situationss or scenarioos should be distinguisheed

homogeneoously by usinng different colours. Thee direct quesstion text shoould be of
course idenntifiable. It should
s be sepparated from
m opening texxt by an emppty line,
always beggin at a new lline and positioned at thee end of the question texxt.
UALITY CIR
RCLE SETU
UP AND REV
VIEW QUES
STIONS
below shows the generall workflow which
w shouldd be followed when settiing up new
reviewing existing
e quesstions. The use
u of the diaagram shall aalso support the aim to
on quality level of questiions.
UESTION RE
EVIEW CHE
ECKLIST
urpose of thee question revview checkliist is to help evaluating existing
e question
basic requirem ments descriibed in this methodology
m y. Most exissting questioons
be reviewed d by using sooftware on a personal computer whicch allows a more
m
working meethod compaared with papper based woorking. But iif no such sy ystem
this checklisst can supporrt the evaluaation processs.
n example for Part 66 reqquirements:
Revision Noo: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 9-12 of 21

CARC
C Airworthinesss Inspector’s Handbook
ONDUCTING
CO G EXAMINA
ATION
All
A examinaation questioons are keppt in a securre manner prior p to an examination n, to ensuree that
candidates
c w
will not knoww which partticular questtions will forrm the basis of the exam mination.
(a) CARC C shall nomin nate:
1. ppersons whoo control the questions too be used forr each examiination;
2. LLicensing Officer
O who shall
s be present during all
a examinations to ensurre the integriity of
tthe examinaation.
(b) Basic examination ns shall folloow the standaard specifiedd in Appendiix I and II too Part-66
(c) Type training exaaminations and type exxaminations shall follow w the stand dard specifieed in
Appenndix III to Paart-66.
(d) New eessay questiions shall bbe raised at least everyy 6 months and questioons already used
withdrrawn or resteed from use. A record of o the questioons used shaall be retained in the reccords
for refference.
(e) All exxamination papers shall be b handed ouut at the startt of the exam
mination to the
t candidatee and
handedd back to the examinner at the end e of the allotted examination time t period. No
examination papeer may be removed from f the eexamination room duriing the allotted
examination time period.
(f) Apart from specifi fic documenttation needed for type exxaminations, only the exxamination ppaper
may be available to t the candiddate during the
t examinattion.
(g) Examiination cand didates shalll be separatted from eacch other so that they cannot c read each
other’ss examinatioon papers. Thhey may nott speak to anny person othher than the examiner.
(h) Candiddates who are provenn to be cheeating shalll be bannedd from takking any fuurther
examination within 12 monthhs of the date d of the examination
e n in which they
t were ffound
cheatinng.
Note:
N CARC C Airmen Cert
C computeerized system m is used inn CARC for the purposee of examination
complying
c w the Exaamination staandard.
with
Issue
I No: 06 Revision Noo: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 9-13 of 21
9.26 Application for Written Examination
The application form must be used (CARC Form 18-0139 as amended).

A completed application form and payment to CARC, Examination Section, together with a copy of
applicant passport which has been certified as a true copy for CARC Part-66 examinations must be
submitted to CARC prior conducting any examination.
9.27 Processing the application
 the information provided on the form is correct

 module(s) exams have not taken within the last 90 days
 Part-66 Appendix II 1.B (the maximum number of consecutive attempts for each module is 3.
Further sets of 3 attempts are allowed with a 1 year period between sets) is in compliance
Subpart D
Conversion of Certifying Staff Qualifications
9.28 Scope
This Subpart provides the procedures for the conversion of certifying staff qualifications referred to
in point Part 66.70 to aircraft maintenance licences.
(a) CARC may only convert qualifications

(i) obtained in CARC and
(ii) valid prior to the entry into force of the applicable requirements of Part-66.
(b) CARC may only perform the conversion in accordance with a conversion report established
pursuant to points 9.29 or 9.30, as applicable.
(c) Conversion reports shall be either (i) developed by CARC or (ii) approved by CARC to
ensure compliance with Part-66.
(d) Conversion reports together with any change of these shall be kept on record by CARC in
accordance with point 9.11.
9.29 Conversion report for national qualifications
(a) The conversion report for national certifying staff qualifications shall describe the scope of
each type of qualification, including the associated national licence, if any, the associated
privileges and include a copy of the relevant national regulations defining these.
(b) The conversion report shall show for each type of qualification referred to in point (a):
1. to which aircraft maintenance licence it will be converted; and
2. which limitations shall be added in accordance with Part 66.70(c) or (d), as
applicable; and
3. the conditions to remove the limitations, specifying the module/subjects on which
examination is needed to remove the limitations and obtain a full aircraft
maintenance licence, or to include an additional (sub-) category. This shall include
the modules defined in Appendix III to Part-66 not covered by the national
qualification.

9.30 Conversion report for approved maintenance organizations authorizations
(a) For each approved maintenance organization concerned, the conversion report shall describe
the scope of each type of authorization issued by the maintenance organization and include a
copy of the relevant approved maintenance organization’s procedures for the qualification and
the authorization of certifying staff on which the conversion process is based.
(b) The conversion report shall show for each type of authorization referred to in point (a):
1. to which aircraft maintenance licence it will be converted, and
2. which limitations shall be added in accordance with part 66.70(c) or (d), as applicable,
and
3. the conditions to remove the limitations, specifying the module/subjects on which
examination is needed to remove the limitations and obtain a full aircraft maintenance
licence, or to include an additional (sub-) category. This shall include the modules
defined in Appendix III to Part-66 not covered by the national qualification.
Note:
CARC has established guidance procedure for conversion from Part 65 into Part 66 under No. 41
and guidance procedure for removal of limitation printed on Par 66 under No. 42 as amended.
Subpart E
Examination Credits
9.31 Scope
This Subpart provides the procedures for granting examination credits referred to in part
66.25(c).
General (66.400)
(a) CARC may only grant credit on the basis of a credit report prepared in accordance with
point 66.405.
(b) The credit report shall be either (i) developed by CARC or (ii) approved by CARC to
ensure compliance with Part-66.
(c) Credit reports together with any change of these shall be dated and kept on record by
CARC in accordance with point 9.11.
Examination credit report (66.405)
(a) The credit report shall include a comparison between:

(i) The modules, sub-modules, subjects and knowledge levels contained in Appendix I to
Part-66, as applicable; and
(ii) The syllabus of the technical qualification concerned relevant to the particular category
being sought.
This comparison shall state if compliance is demonstrated and contain the justifications for
each statement.
(b) Credit for examinations, other than basic knowledge examinations carried out in
maintenance training organizations approved in accordance with Part-147, can only be
granted by CARC.
(c) No credit can be granted unless there is a statement of compliance against each module
and sub-module, stating where, in the technical qualification, the equivalent standard can
be found.

(d) CARC shall check on a regular basis whether (i) the national qualification standard or
(ii) Appendix I to Part-66 have changed and assess if changes to the credit report are
consequently required. Such changes shall be documented, dated and recorded.
9.32 Examination credit validity
(a) CARC shall notify to the applicant in writing any credits granted together with the reference
to the credit report used.
(b) Credits shall expire 10 years after they are granted.
(c) Upon expiration of the credits, the applicant may apply for new credits. CARC shall
continue the validity of the credits for an additional period of 10 years without further
consideration if basic knowledge requirements defined in Appendix I to Part-66 have not
been changed.
Subpart F
Continuing Oversight
9.33 Scope
This Subpart describes the procedures for the continuing oversight of the aircraft maintenance
licence and in particular for the revocation, suspension or limitation of the aircraft maintenance
licence.
9.34 Revocation, suspension or limitation of the aircraft maintenance licence
If the certificate holder does not correct the deficiency within the established deadlines, the
Airworthiness Inspector should immediately inform the Director through the responsible division’s
chief with a recommendation that enforcement action shall be taken against the certificate holder's by
either imposing a fine or the privileges be temporarily or permanently withdrawn or restricted. If,
after careful review of all circumstances involved and following necessary coordination and
consultation within the CARC Commissioners Counsel, there is agreement on the need to impose a
fine, suspend or revoke the certificate holder's privileges, the Airworthiness Department should
officially handover the case to the Commissioner Council, thereafter inform the certificate holder in
writing summarizing both the proposed action and the reasons for it.
CARC shall suspend, limit or revoke the aircraft maintenance licence where it has identified a
safety issue or if it has clear evidence that the person has carried out or been involved in one or
more of the following activities:
1. obtaining the aircraft maintenance licence and/or the certification privileges by falsification
of documentary evidence;
2. failing to carry out requested maintenance combined with failure to report such fact to the
organization or person who requested the maintenance;
3. failing to carry out required maintenance resulting from own inspection combined with
failure to report such fact to the organization or person for whom the maintenance was
intended to be carried out;
4. negligent maintenance;
5. falsification of the maintenance record;
6. issuing a certificate of release to service knowing that the maintenance specified on the
certificate of release to service has not been carried out or without verifying that such
maintenance has been carried out;
7. carrying out maintenance or issuing a certificate of release to service when adversely
affected by alcohol or drugs;

8. issuing certificate of release to service while not in compliance with Part-M, Part-145 or (Part-
66.
Note:
CARC has established guidance and administrative procedure on this regard incorporated in the
guidance 18-2510, item 3.
Subpart G
Validation of aircraft maintenance licenses in accordance with ICAO Annex 1
9.35 Scope
Based on the provisions of paragraph 1.2.2 of Annex 1 which states'' When a Contracting State
renders valid a license issued by another Contracting State, as an alternative to the issuance of its
own license, it shall establish validity by suitable authorization to be carried with the former license
accepting it as the equivalent of the latter. The validity of the authorization shall not extend beyond
the period of validity of the license''. License validations are issued to the holder of an aviation
document which has been issued by an ICAO State or by any other state which is in compliance
with ICAO Annex 1.
The validation shall be granted for a maximum period of six months.

The validation is contingent upon the continued validity of the license submitted.
The validation may contain certain limitations to the privileges listed on the holder’s license. A
limitation on the validation may contain the restriction to sign for the release to service of the
aircraft, while allowing the license holder to sign-off individual tasks.
Detailed PEL procedures providing the requirements to be met for issuing a validation for a licence,
which can be as simple as stating that a licence issued by another Contracting State and meeting
ICAO Annex 1 requirements can be validated by CARC.
To assess its validity and privileges, and to ensure that it is genuine and complies with ICAO
Standards:
a. The license must be appropriately endorsed for the type and class of aircraft to be
operated; A current medical certificate must also be submitted along with a
completed License Validation application form in a manner accepted to CARC.
b. The holder’s license will only be valid for exercising its privileges on Jordanian
registered aircraft, within the validity period of the license, when accompanied with
validation provided by CARC
c. Letter of Verification from the issuing Authority to confirm license issued in full
compliance with ICAO Annex 1, applicants name, date of birth, license held, ratings
held on license, currency and validity of license must be obtained.
d. A compliance process with the Jordanian knowledge and experience requirements
for the validation may be initiated. Any non-compliance should either lead to refuse
a validation or to limit the privileges.
e. Review of Annex 1 Supplement is initiated and reviewed for the issuing state
9.36 Eligibility requirements
 Be at least a 28 years of age.

 A Certificate of Validation will not be issued where a person holding an ICAO
Contracting State license is seeking regular employment.

 Before a license is validated, it must have the aircraft type(s) for which the validation
is required, specified in the Aircraft Rating.
 Applications for a Certificate of Validation may be accepted when submitted by the
Jordanian operating company on behalf of the holder.
 Proof of identity – Actual passport or actual or authenticated Birth Certificate. A
photocopy will be acceptable provided all the relevant information is clearly
presented and the copy is certified by the Jordanian operating company.
 Letter of Verification from the issuing Authority to confirm license issued in full
compliance with ICAO Annex 1, applicants name, date of birth, license held, ratings
held on license, currency and validity of license is received.
 Holds a valid Jordanian third- class medical certificate issued under JCAR MED.
 Holds Jordanian work permit issued in accordance with the provisions of Ministry of
Labor.
 The applicant shall be in compliance with the provision of Part 65.14
 Current Continuation Training on aircraft type rating, Company MOE or CAME,
Human Factor and Fuel Tank safety as applicable.
 The issuing states in compliance with Annex 1 standards.
9.37 Inspector’s Responsibility
 ensure that the foreign licences submitted for validation are genuine, valid
and meet ICAO requirements;
 understand the privileges and limitations of the foreign licences and ratings
submitted for validation or conversion;
 establish the proper limitations to be attached to the validation of a foreign
licence (e.g. privileges, expiry date)
Subpart H
Personnel Certification in accordance with Part 65
9.38 Scope
1. This subpart establishes the procedures including the administrative requirements to be

followed by CARC of the implementation and the enforcement of Part-65, Subpart D, E and
I.
2. Certificates issued in accordance with Part-65 before Part 66 applies shall remain valid until
they are changed, suspended or revoked or till 28 September 2015.
3. Ongoing basic training courses complying with the requirements applicable before Parts 147
and 66 apply shall be continued for a maximum period of thirty six months after 01 September
2013 which Parts 147 and Part 66 apply.
4. Basic knowledge examinations, conducted by CARC, complying with the requirements

applicable before Parts 147 and Part 66 apply shall be conducted for a maximum period of
forty eight months after the date by which Parts 147 and 66 apply.
5. All applications submitted before 01 September 2013 will be processed in accordance with
this Subpart.

Section A Mechanic Certification

9.39 Scope
 The Subparts D, E, I and the Appendixes A, B, C, D, E, of Part 65 regulation remain valid

until 28 September 2015.
 Ongoing basic training courses complying with the requirements applicable before Part 147
applies may be continued for a maximum period of thirty six months after the date by which
Parts 147 and 66 apply.
 Any maintenance license and if any, the technical limitations associated with that license,
issued by CARC in accordance with Part 65 requirements and procedures and valid at the
time of entry into force of Part 66, shall be deemed to have been issued in accordance with
Part 66.
In order to be granted authorization to issue certificates of release to service, a person must hold a
valid license issued in accordance with the applicable licensing requirements. The minimum age to
hold a license is 18 years. In order to certify, the minimum age is 23.
Certifying staff must not exercise the privileges of their certification authorization if they know or
suspect that their physical or mental condition renders them unfit to exercise such privileges.
Part 65, Subparts A and D, provide the regulatory basis for mechanic certification with airframe
and/or powerplant ratings.
This subpart provides guidance for the testing and certification of aviation mechanics.
Mechanic applicants who meet the eligibility requirements of JCAR Section 65.71 should be
permitted to take the required tests. Determinations of applicant eligibility will be made only by a
CARC airworthiness inspector.
9.40 Mechanic Eligibility
(a) To be eligible for a mechanic certificate and associated ratings, a person must:
 Be at least 18 years of age;
 Holds a General Secondary Certificate (Tawjihi of Jordan) or equivalent foreign certificate
with pass result;
 Has passed all of the prescribed tests within a period of 24 months;
 Pass English evaluation test to ensure his ability to read, write, speak, and understand English
language. The English evaluation test must be evaluated against a standard accepted by the
Chief Commissioner/CEO; The English test evaluates the ability of an individual to use and
understand technical aviation. It was developed to address the problem on ensuring English
language proficiency for non-native speakers wishing to apply for CARC license. The passing
grade is 60 percent since it’s a tool to verify reading, understanding and writing English as
required by the regulation, The English evaluation test is made at CARC Licensing Unit.
 Comply with the sections of this subpart that apply to the rating he seeks; and
 Holds at least a valid third-class medical certificate issued under Part MED of JCAR.
 A graduation certificate from an approved aviation maintenance technician school acceptable
to the Chief Commissioner/CEO and appropriate to the mechanic certificate and rating
sought; or
 The applicant presents documentary evidence, satisfactory to CARC in accordance with
provisions of experience requirements (Part 65.77) as follows:

 At least 20 months of practical experience with the procedures, practices, materials,

tools, machine tools and equipment generally used in constructing, maintenance or
altering airframes or power plants appropriate to the rating sought;
 At least 40 months of practical experience concurrently performing the duties
appropriate to both the airframe and power plant ratings;
(b) A certificated mechanic who applies for an additional rating must meet the requirements of the
experience requirements and, within a period of 24 months, passes the basic examinations.
9.41 Mechanic Experience
The experience required of a mechanic applicant should represent accumulated practical experience
in the maintenance of airframes and/or powerplants. It is the intent that the practical experience
gained will provide an applicant with an opportunity to obtain basic knowledge of and skills with
the procedures, practices, materials, tools, machine tools, and equipment generally used in aircraft
construction, alteration, or maintenance and inspection, regardless of where acquired during the
learning process. Thus, experience gained in performing maintenance on military aircraft, working
as an airframe or powerplant mechanic helper, or in building an aircraft at home should be
evaluated on its own merits if it meets the intent of the experience requirements.
a. Applicants should not be expected to have become highly proficient in overhauls, major
repairs, or major modifications of aircraft in the minimum 40 months experience.
b. At least 20 months of practical experience with the procedures, practices, materials,
tools, machine tools and equipment generally used in constructing, maintenance or
altering airframes or power plants appropriate to the rating sought
c. At least 40 months of practical experience concurrently performing the duties
appropriate to both the airframe and power plant ratings;
9.42 Proof of Identity
For all Part-65 initial issue applications, proof of identity is required. In most cases, a passport and
birth certificate must be provided. Identity cards will be accepted where other proof of identity
cannot be produced, however,
In all cases, if the personal details provided on the license application form conflicts with the
evidence of identity or, the information provided is not clear both on the evidence of identity and
application form, the application will be returned to the applicant without assessment.
9.43 Examination Standards
(c) Satisfactory completion of training shall be demonstrated through an examination and

demonstration of practical experience on the aircraft,
(d) All basic examinations must be carried out using the multi-choice question format and essay
questions.
(e) All examination questions shall be kept in a secure manner prior to an examination, to ensure
that applicants will not know which particular questions will form the basis of the
examination.
(f) Basic examinations shall follow the standard specified in Appendix –A, Appendix –B,
Appendix-C and D to Part 65 as appropriate.
(g) An essay examination shall be followed automatically after passing the multi-choice
questions.
(h) After passing the examinations, the examinee will be eligible to proceed to the practical tests
(i) Applicants shall be separated from each other so that they cannot read each other's
examination papers. They may not speak to any person other than the examination officer
(j) The pass mark for each multi-choice part of the examination is 70 percent.

(k) The pass mark for each essay question is 60 percent that is the candidates answer must
contain 60 percent of the required key points addressed by the question and no significant
error related to any required key point.
9.44 Re-Testing After Failure
An applicant for a written, or practical test for a certificate and rating, or for an additional rating
under JCAR part 65, may apply for retesting for a four maximum attempts.
 If the applicant for a mechanic certificate failed to pass any single examination paper after the
fourth attempt, the applicant will not be eligible for re-entry to examination unless the applicant
undertakes further training.
 If the applicant for a mechanic certificate failed the fourth attempt, the applicant will not be
eligible for the rating for which he/she applied unless he/she passes a new course in this rating
as per Part 147 training organization’s approved manual (PPM or MTOE).
9.45 The Mechanic Test(s)
a. Aviation Mechanic General (AMG).

b. Aviation Mechanic Airframe (AMA).
c. Aviation Mechanic Powerplant (AMP).
d. Airframe/Powerplant or A&P Practical test.
Note: A certificated mechanic who applies for an additional rating must meet the experience
requirements (65.77) and, within a period of 24 months, passes the basic examinations and tests.
9.46 Application for Basic Examination/Practical Tests
Eligible applicants showed proof of experience, or graduation certificate of approved 147 school
shall complete CARC Form 18-0124 “Airman Certificate and/or Rating Application” that will be
evaluated by the Inspector before signing and sending it to the Licensing Unit for the basic tests.
9.47 Practical Tests
The Airworthiness Inspector designated to conduct practical test will sign beside his name on the
Examination Sheet (CARC Form 18-0224). If the applicant passed the test, the word “PASS” will be
written in the block of that test, if failed, the word “FAILED” will be put. Upon completion of all
tests, a memorandum will be signed by the last inspector conducted the test. The memorandum will
be sent to the Licensing Unit for issuing the required license.
Upon receiving the memorandum, the Licensing Unit will issue a certificate valid for three years for
the signature of the CARC Chief Commissioner.
9.49 Certificate Renewal

In accordance with Part 66.00, para (d)(2); Certificates issued in accordance with Part-65 before Part
66 Regulation applies shall remain valid until they are changed, suspended or revoked or till 31
December 2016 .
The holder of a Mechanic Certificate may apply for renewal and conversion, by completing the
application form; CARC Form18-0124 in accordance with guidance procedure No. 41 as amended.

Part 10
Certification of products, parts and appliances
(Refer to TC/STC Process Flowchart in Annex 4)
10.1 General
Application for the approval of a product or appliance must be submitted to the CEO/Chief
Commissioner by using Form 18-0232 “Application for Type Certificate, Change to Type
Certificate, or Supplemental Type Certificate” attached with a formal application letter. The
application must include the name and address of the applicant, together with a brief description
including a 3-view drawing, basic data, proposed characteristics and performance and the proposed
Certification Specifications (CS) of the product or appliance in question, and the type of approval
requested. Also, proposed environmental and emission protection levels should be included in the
application. A time schedule should be included.
A written acknowledgement of receipt of the application shall be sent to the applicant within twenty
(20) working days following the receipt of the application by CARC.
In case the application is not complete or incorrect the applicant will be given one (1) month but not
more than three (3) months period for delivering the required information. If decision is to be taken
that the application cannot be accepted, CARC shall notify the applicant with reasons and shall
show good cause why it was decided to return the application without acceptance.
Any fees paid under the “Fees and Charges Regulation” are non-refundable.
Upon acceptance by CARC, the applicant will be informed within two (2) month after receipt of the
correct application of the following:
- the acceptance of the application,

- the names of the Project Certification Manager (PCM) and specialists of the assigned team
- the program’s number
- receipt of any fees associated with the application
10.2 Certification Team
In order to establish an appropriate Certification Team the extension and complexity of the work to
accomplish need to be estimated, either by studying the contents of the application for simple
projects or by an initial briefing by the applicant for the more complex projects. The Certification
Team should comprise the disciplines required for the tasks to accomplish and may consist of staff
of CARC and/or staff contracted from Foreign Civil Aviation Authorities or qualified Consultancy
Offices. In case of using contracted certification experts, the following selection criteria shall apply,
in order of importance:
a) Qualification
b) Experience
c) Availability
d) Costs
The composition and size of Certification Teams can vary and is dependent on the product to be
certified.

10.3 Type certification and supplemental type certification
10.3.1 Pre-TC phase and CRI’s
The product approval process is distinguished in work related to the issuance of the basic Type
Certificate (Pre-TC phase) and work related to an already approved product, but being altered or
modified (Post TC phase), such as an alternative engine installation, fuselage stretch, various
approved modifications and options, etc.
All subjects for which the PCM deems it necessary to record (normally on the recommendation of
specialists) will be recorded in a Certification Review Item (CRI). Such a CRI will further assist the
PCM to control the debate between the members of Certification Team and the applicant until an
agreed conclusion about the certification subject has been reached. CRI’s are also used to record the
Type Certification Basis, and the agreement of the applicant thereof, any additional requirements
such as environmental protection requirements, and any subject dealt with within a specialist
discipline for the settlement of for example guidance material, acceptable means of compliance or
Special Conditions, which will then be referenced in the Type Certification Basis.
For the Type Certification Basis, CRI A-1 is exclusively reserved. All other numbering
identification system for the CRI’s should be included in the PCM Project Information Document.
See Annex 1 for details about the CRI procedures.
10.3.1.1 Phase I: Technical Familiarization and Initial Type Certification Basis
CARC Certification Team needs to receive thorough technical briefings by the applicant on all
aspects known at that stage, to fully understand the design, including new technologies, and any
unique or unconventional features or intended unconventional use of the product. This technical
information on the design features should be used by the team to determine the adequacy of the
applicable CS, and where necessary propose specific Special Conditions as referenced in JCAR
21.16B.
Based on the initial findings and recommendations of the Certification Team, the PCM shall draft
the initial Type Certification Basis.
Therefore the initial Type Certification Basis will include the following sections:
 The applicable CS;

 Additional Requirements the applicant wishes to include in the Certification Basis (for
example newest amendments of CS which are to be published after the date of application);
 Equivalent Safety Findings;
 A reference to CRI’s discussing Alternative Means of Compliance if the applicant wishes to
deviate from normal practice; and
 A reference to CRI’s settling interpretations of the CS.
Phase I is to be concluded by the issue of CRI A-1 detailing the initial Type Certification Basis.
10.3.1.2 Phase II: Certification program
After receipt of the applicant’s proposed certification program, the certification team shall discuss
and agree with the applicant the certification program, which shall define the proposed means of
compliance with the Certification Basis, and identifies the team involvement for compliance

demonstrations, test witnessing, compliance tracking, compliance recording, conformity statements,

time schedule for achieving compliance, etc.
All documents required to show compliance with the applicable requirements and their scheduled
date of availability shall be referenced in the Certification Program.
When defining the involvement of the team, full use should be made of the applicant’s DOA
privileges granted under JCAR 21.263(b). Particularly all compliance documents which the
applicant can approve under its DOA without further verification by the team shall be agreed with
the applicant.
The PCM (on the recommendation of specialists) shall indicate his concurrence with the agreed
program in writing. The Certification Program will be recorded in a CRI.
10.3.1.3 Phase III: Compliance determination
The task of showing compliance with the certification basis is the responsibility of the applicant.
The applicant will also record and produce the following:
The CARC Type Design:
 A procedure to cover equipment qualification;

 Certification documents (including compliance reports, manuals etc);
 A Declaration of Compliance with the applicable requirements for each compliance report;
The acceptance of the compliance demonstrations is the responsibility of the certification team.
10.3.1.4 Phase IV: Final report and issue TC
10.3.1.4.1 Statement of compliance
On completion of the certification program, the applicant shall provide a Declaration of Compliance
that the type design of the product having been type certificated, complies with the Type
Certification Basis as recorded in CRI A-1.
The team members will issue a Statement of satisfaction to the PCM on the basis of the applicant’s
compliance declaration of the discipline involved.
When the PCM has accepted all necessary Statements of Satisfaction from the team, the PCM shall
issue a compliance statement to the Director Airworthiness (DA) confirming that the type design of
the product complies with the certification basis as recorded in CRI A-1.
10.3.1.4.2 Final Report
The PCM shall produce in conjunction with the team a report which will record the type design on
which the type investigation process was based, including a description of all CRI’s related to the
certification basis, e.g. Special Conditions, Equivalent Safety Findings, Alternative Interpretations,
etc. Also, the significant subjects investigated by the team and the details and outcome of these
investigations will be a subject, including the process of investigation, with the certification
program and the conclusions regarding the compliance to the certification basis.

10.3.1.4.3 Issue of Type Certificate
After approval of the final report, the PCM shall draft the CARC Type Certificate for the product
certified. After ensuring that all necessary steps for the administrative and financial project closures
are performed, the Type Certificate shall be issued and send to the applicant.
A Type Certificate Data Sheet shall form part of the CARC TC and is to be drafted on the basis of
the Type Certification Basis and the Type Design information of the certificate holder. The format
of the TCDS shall concur with the ICAO format (see example in Annex 2).
Publication on the CARC website of the TC and the TCDS shall follow, as practical, immediately
after issue.
10.3.1.4.4 Acceptance of an imported Aircraft, Related Products, Parts and Appliances and
Data for Changes and Repairs
Acceptance of an imported Aircraft, Related Products, Parts and Appliances and Data for Changes
and Repairs is processed in accordance with the Guidance Procedure AWS 01.
10.3.2 Post TC phase
After the initial (pre) TC phase, the particular knowledge of the subject product as gained by the
PCM and the certification team must be ensured, in order to handle after the Type Certification
subjects related to continued airworthiness, type design changes and repairs.
10.3.2.1 Classification of changes
Type design changes may be applied for by the TC holder or a non-TC Holder. Under JCAR 21.93,
changes must be classified by the assigned PCM and the relevant certification team as minor or
major.
10.3.2.2 Approval of TC and STC design changes
Minor changes by the TC holder may be approved under the privileges of the TC-holder’s DOA, or
else by CARC. Major changes applied for by the TC-Holder must be approved by CARC using the
assigned PCM and the relevant certification team in place for matters concerning the subject
product. Major changes applied for by a non-TC-holder must be applied for as a Supplemental Type
Certificate, in compliance with the requirements of Part 21 Subpart E. For the approval of such a
STC, it is preferred that the assigned PCM and the relevant certification team are used.
10.3.2.3 Continued Airworthiness, Service Bulletins and AD’s
The holder of a type-certificate, supplemental type-certificate, JTSO authorization or Major Repair

design approval shall under the provisions of JCAR 21.3 review all occurrences, incidents and
accidents with the approved product and propose where applicable, solutions to CARC. These
solutions may be design changes, maintenance requirements or operational requirements and must
be approved by CARC through the use of the assigned PCM and the relevant certification team.
These solutions are the subject of a Service Bulletin (SB). If such a SB requires a specific time of
implementation, CARC will approve this period. If the implementation relates to restoring the
intended level of safety, CARC may mandate this implementation by issuing an AD and revoke if
necessary the Certificates of Airworthiness for individual aircraft, if implementation has not been
incorporated at the required period of time, or impose other limitations.

10.3.2.4 Repairs
Repairs must be classified as minor or major in accordance with the requirements of JCAR 21.435
by CARC or by an organization with an appropriate DOA approval.
Major repairs applied for by the TC holder may be approved by CARC or by the TC-holder under
its appropriate DOA approval.
If applied for by a non TC Holder, the major repair must be approved by CARC.
Minor repairs may be approved by the applicant under its appropriate DOA approval, or else by
CARC.
Preferably, in all cases the assigned PCM and the relevant certification team in place for the TC of
the subject product should be used.
10.4 JTSO Authorization
10.4.1 General
A JTSO Authorization is an approval of CARC for the design and production of an article, i.e. a
part or an appliance (for example: a passenger seat unit, a galley appliance, an avionics suite, etc.)
for which it has been shown that it meets the particular certification specifications. Such article is
that allowed to be used for the installation in a civil aircraft, without further investigation. The
holder of a JTSO Authorization must report to CARC any failure, malfunction, defect or other
occurrence of which it has been made aware and must be capable of investigating such occurrence
and propose resolutions and corrective actions to CARC for acceptance.
Note: This paragraph 10.4 describes only the process to obtain the design approval for an article
under existing TSO specifications and as such recognized by CARC. Jordan will normally only
accept TSO articles conforming to the certification specifications as published by EASA (CS-
ETSO).
10.4.2 Application
Any person or legal entity whose principal place of business is within Jordan may apply for a JTSO
Authorization (JTSOA) not being an Auxiliary Power Unit, provided the applicant uses an approved
set of procedures for the design of the article in accordance with the particular TSO specification.
For producing the article under a JTSOA, the applicant must hold an appropriate Production
Organization Approval (see section 12 of this Handbook). Applicants seeking an approval of an
APU under a JTSOA, must hold a DOA (see section 11 of this Handbook).

10.4.3 Investigation process
Investigation of the design of the article, for which an application for a JTSO Authorization
(JTSOA) has been received, will be made by the CARC Airworthiness Standards Department, when
the application has been accepted by the DA. The designated PCM will propose a team to the DA
and after acceptance; the team will investigate the design, ensuring that the applicant has submitted
the following documentation:
- The technical data required in the applicable TSO specification;

- A time schedule for completion of the design and approval process;
- A time schedule for tests;
- The exposition in order to demonstrate the capability of production under POA;
- A compliance record, showing the methods of compliance demonstration with every
applicable requirement;
- All appropriate manuals for the operation, maintenance, overhaul and repair of the JTSO
article;
- A statement of compliance to certify that the applicant has met the requirements of the
JTSO; and
- A Declaration of Design and Performance (DDP).
10.4.4 Issue of JTSO Authorization
The Declaration of Design and Performance, issued by the applicant, must contain at least the
following information:
- Information on the identity of the article and its design and testing standards;
- The rated performance of the article;
- A statement of compliance that the article has met the appropriate TSO standards;
- Reference to relevant test reports; and
- References to the appropriate maintenance, overhaul, and repair manuals.
When the investigation has been completed in accordance with this Handbook and compliance with
all applicable requirements has been demonstrated, the PCM will submit a final report including the
DDP of the applicant to the DA. When accepted, CARC will issue a JTSOA and publish the
relevant JTSOA and description on CARC website.
10.4.5 Post JTSO Authorization
10.4.5.1 Design changes
The holder of a JTSO Authorization may submit minor design changes for approval under the
existing JTSOA. CARC will perform the classification of the change in accordance with this
handbook, JCAR Part 21 and related AMC, or by the holder of the JTSOA if it holds an appropriate
DOA.
All other changes not classified as minor are major and must be submitted as an application for a
new JTSOA.

10.4.5.2 Continued airworthiness actions and AD’s
CARC is responsible for the initiation and promulgation of mandatory corrective actions (AD’s),
including the interval of compliance to such AD’s, to any occurrence reported by the holder of a
JTSOA. Such AD’s must be communicated by CARC to all Foreign Authorities having a product
with such a JTSO on their register.
10.4.5.3 Service bulletins
The holder of a JTSOA must have in place an effective system for the creation and dissemination of
Service Bulletins with any relevant information for the article under the JTSO specification for the
relevant maintenance, overhaul and repair data.
10.4.5.4 Repairs
Repairs not contained in the approved Repair Manual will be handled by CARC as design changes.
10.5 Interface with other activities and organizations
10.5.1 DOA and POA
When an application is made for a TC, the applicant not holding an appropriate DOA must also
apply for such DOA. CARC need to include in the team that approves the DOA (the DOA team) at
least a member experienced in type certification processes.
A member of the (POA team) shall participate in the type certification team to ensure the interface
with certification and evaluate the maintenance documentation
10.5.2 Aircraft/engine/propeller interactions
The applicant for an aircraft TC is responsible for the installation of the engine/propeller on the
aircraft and must show compliance to installation requirements in the applicable CS. The
engine/propeller manufacturer is expected to support the aircraft TC applicant in this process.
10.5.3 Operations
If the applicant for an aircraft TC requests to establish an operations evaluation board (OEB), the
DA shall liaise with the Operations Standards Department of CARC who will ensure that an OEB is
formed with appropriate representation covering airworthiness, operational and licensing aspects.
The PCM shall ensure appropriate representation on the OEB from the certification team.
10.5.4 Maintenance
In the type certification process and other design approvals the applicant shall furnish instructions
for continued airworthiness in accordance with the appropriate section of the CS. These instructions
shall comprise the approved airworthiness limitation section containing Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs). All airworthiness limitations and CMR’s shall be reviewed and accepted by
the certification team to ensure compliance with the certification basis.

For new transport category aircraft or new variants of such with a MTOM exceeding 13000kg, the
DA will request the Airworthiness Inspection Division to set up a Maintenance Review Board
(MRB).
For transport category aircraft with a MTOM between 5700 and 13000 kg, the TC applicant may
ask for a MRB on a voluntary basis.
For aircraft with a MTOM of less than 5700 kg, a MRB is normally not required.
10.6 Issuance of a Type Certificate
10.6.1 Legal framework
CARC issues Type Certificates and the associated Type Certification Data Sheet (TCDS) based on
the principles of ICAO annex 8, the requirements of JCAR Part 21, Subpart B and the related AMC,
and within the context of the Civil Aviation Law.
10.6.2 Issuance process
A Type Certificate will be issued after the successful completion of the certification or validation
process. The filing of the application is a condition to the start of such a process. The Type
Certificate is a document, considered to include besides the name of the certificate holder also the
type design, the operating limitations, the TCDS for airworthiness and emissions requirements,
including the applicable type-certification basis and environmental protection requirements with
which CARC records compliance, and any other conditions or limitations prescribed for the product
in the applicable certification specifications and environmental protection requirements. Each TC is
uniquely numbered, and the Documentation filing Officer will maintain a public record of all TC’s
issued by CARC with the associated TCDS. The TC must be returned by the TC Holder to CARC
after the surrender, suspension or revocation of the TC.
10.6.3 Responsibilities
The DA is responsible for the execution of the procedure of the type certification and the
appointment of the certification team. The PCM is responsible for the contents of the TC and TCDS
and ensures that the certification process is carried out in accordance with the applicable
requirements of JCAR Part 21, Subpart B as reflected in this Handbook.
10.7 Issuance of Certificate of Airworthiness
The procedure which describes how CARC will handle initial applications, renewals and continued
surveillance of the Certificates of Airworthiness issued in respect of aircraft on the Jordanian civil
aircraft register is established in Part 4 of this Handbook.
10.8 Suspension, revocation and transfer of (S)TC and JTSO authorization
A TC, STC or JTSOA can be suspended or revoked by the Commissioner, on the recommendation
of the DA. This will be the case when the holder of a TC/STC or JTSOA submits the certificate to
the Chief Commissioner, or when the Chief Commissioner determines, that the holder can no longer
fulfill the obligations and duties relating to keeping the product in continuous compliance with the
airworthiness requirements, including continued airworthiness. If the holder of a TC/STC or
JTSOA has failed to comply with the duties relating to keeping the product in continuous
compliance with the airworthiness requirements, the holder will be given a three (3) months period

to rectify the situation. Meanwhile a suspension can be called for when the Chief Commissioner
regards the non-compliance by the certificate holder as temporary.
A suspension or revocation shall be published on the website of CARC and ultimately in the Jordan
Government Gazette, and shall be communicated to all Foreign Authorities known to have the
relevant product on their register, or installed in aircraft on their register.
In the case of revocation, the number used for the identification of that certificate shall not be used
again for a later or different certificate.

Part 11
Design Organization Approval
11.1 Scope of the procedure
This procedure describes how CARC will handle initial applications for approval of design
organizations and how CARC organization is structured to perform this task.
The approval shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Jordan Civil Aviation
Regulations (JCAR) of Part 21 and will follow the related AMC and GM.
The approval of design organizations will be for an initial approval and the approval continuation.
The approved design organization shall be monitored under the conditions of CARC Continued
Surveillance Program, as to ensure continued compliance with the requirements of JCAR Part 21.
approval, the change of limitations, suspension or revocation of DOA approvals and the resolution
of non-compliances.
The Chief Division is responsible for the following:
 Make proposals to the DA for project teams;

 Display good team leadership and teamwork;
 Ensure that the project procedures are adhered to; and
 Resolution of team controversies.
Further, each investigation team for DOA application shall have a DOA Team leader and an
appropriate number of DOA specialists. One of the team members shall be a certification specialist.
The Team leader must be capable of performing the following duties:
 to initiate the procedure for the determination of the DOA team, including size and the
specializations to be covered;
 where applicable to select suitable advisers for specialized areas of investigation;
 to organize the work of the team, with respect to planning, areas to be covered, work sharing
between team members, etc.;
 to notify the applicant of the process which will be applied;
 to process alternatives to AMC or GM in JCAR Part 21 and reach agreement with the Chief
Division;
 to arrange liaison with Foreign Authorities in case of DOA application from an applicant
outside the territory of Jordan;
 to report to the Chief Division any problems encountered and propose resolutions;
 to ensure liaison with Certification within Airworthiness Standards Department with the
assistance of the team member with certification experience;
 to ensure adequate record keeping, using checkpoints during the investigating process, and
communicating these checkpoints with the Chief Division;
 to ensure that minutes of all formal meetings are taken and that these minutes of meeting are
agreed by the team and the applicant; and

 to report the findings to the Chief Division with a final report, with proposed terms of
approval and limitations as appropriate.
Team members shall:
 have knowledge of JCAR Part 21, e.g. having participated in appropriate Part 21 training
courses;
 have an appropriate aviation experience;
 be able to verify that the applicant works in accordance with the applicant’s handbooks;
 be able to check the effectiveness of the applicants procedures by audits; and
 be able to verify the competence of the applicant’s personnel.
CARC trainees may participate in the team at no direct cost to the applicant.
Application for DOA approval must be submitted to the Chief Commissioner by using CARC Form
18-0283 “Application for Design Organization Approval (DOA)”. The application shall be
accompanied by a completed initial compliance checklist; CARC Form 18-0284 “Compliance
Checklist–Design Organization Approval”.
The application must include the name and address of the applicant, accompanied with a description
of the scope of the design organization and the requested terms of approval in relation to the design
scope.
In case the application is not complete, or incorrect, the applicant will be given not more than a
three (3) months period for delivering the required information. If decision is to be taken that the
application cannot be accepted, CARC shall notify the applicant with reasons and shall show good
cause why it was to be decided to return the application without acceptance.
Upon acceptance by CARC, the applicant will be informed within one (1) month after receipt of the
 the acceptance of the application;

 the names of the Team leader and specialists of the assigned team;
 the administrative CARC program number; and
 Receipt of any fees associated with the application.
The DOA Team leader will initiate the process by organizing a first meeting with the applicant for:
 a general presentation by the applicant, explaining the proposed scope of work of the
applicant and the requested terms of approval of DOA,

 a description by the DOA team leader of the investigation process as described in this
Handbook.
The DOA Team leader will send the minutes of this meeting to the Chief Division and the
applicant/DOA Manager (checkpoint 1).
At the beginning of the investigation process, the DOA team shall:
 Study the design organization handbook and associated data as meant in JCAR 21.A.243,
including the proposed design assurance system,
Take into account; all experience the team members have accumulated about the applicant,
and any in-service data of the other products of the applicant (if applicable), including
aircraft TCs, STCs and TSO authorizations;
 Establish the investigation program in accordance with the guidelines established in CARC
Form 18-0307 “Evaluation Questionnaire of a Design Organization”, and include:
 a brief description of the design organization (location of facilities, scope of work,

processes, etc).;
 the organizational position of the manager responsible for the independent quality function
as meant in JCAR 21.A.139(b)(2);
 Identification of key features of the design organization (design work sharing, methods of
compliance verification, airworthiness organization, internal process system monitoring
etc.);
 tasks to be performed by the DOA team; and
 Detailed planning of the investigation program (dates, subjects, meetings locations etc.).
This preparatory phase is an internal DOA team working phase, made up of individual team
member studies and preparations, and complete DOA team working sessions managed and
organized by the DOA Team leader.
At the closure of Phase II, the DOA Team leader will submit the completed CARC Form 18-0307
“Evaluation Questionnaire of a Design Organization” to the Chief Division for approval
(checkpoint 2).
11.4.3 Phase III Presentation to the applicant of the investigation program
The DOA team leader will present CARC approved investigation program to the applicant and will
establish an agreed time schedule.
During this phase, the complete design system of the applicant, including the design assurance
system and its effectiveness, shall be reviewed in order to check exhaustively that the design
organization complies with JCAR Part 21 and secondly to check as practical on a sample basis that
the applicant is actually working in accordance with the system described in the applicant’s
handbook.
For each subject defined in the investigation program, the following process will be followed:

 Preparation of questionnaire (appropriate parts of CARC Form 18-0307 “Evaluation

Questionnaire of a Design Organization”) by the DOA team, with cross references to JCAR
Part 21;
 Sending the questionnaire to the applicant by the DOA Team leader;
 Review of the questionnaire with the applicant during a meeting;
 Record all discrepancies in applying the requirements of JCAR Part 21 or its AMC in a
DOA Review Item (DOARI);
 Record the positions of team and applicant, until a satisfactory solution has been reached
and accepted by the team and Chief Division in the DOARI;
 Follow up of all other questions raised until a satisfactory closure is obtained by the DOA
team;
 Follow up of open actions up to their closures; and
 Perform audits on one or more samples selected by the DOA team leader and on
recommendations provided by DOA team.
During phase IV the DOA Team leader will make a status report to the Chief Division (checkpoint
3), as soon as the key features of the design organization of the applicant have been assessed.
When new items are identified, the investigation program will be amended to include these new
items.
The team will take into account information from all sources as to the functioning of the procedures
and design system of the applicant that is available, e.g. from certification teams, maintenance data
or from previous experience with the applicant.
When all subjects of this phase have been processed as above and have been satisfactorily closed,
including the sample audit(s), then phase IV shall be deemed to be complete. However, it is
accepted, that some actions required by the DOA team may take time for implementation and may
remain open at the end of this phase, provided a corrective action program proposed by the
applicant has been agreed by the DOA team.
In this phase, the DOA Team leader will prepare a final report, using the input from the team
members, and complete CARC Form 18-0308 “Evaluation Summary of a Design Organization” and
send these to the Chief Division (checkpoint 4). After review and acceptance, these will be
submitted to the DA for approval. Part of the final report is the surveillance program for the first
year after granting approval. The date of approval will be the date of validity of the terms of
approval.
The DOA Team leader will provide the conclusions of the approved final report to the applicant.
After approval has been granted, the DOA Team leader and the team will remain in place to handle
applications for changes and to perform continued surveillance of the DOA.
11.5 Issuance of the Design Organization Approval certificate
Following agreement of the checkpoints, submission of the final report and acceptance of the terms
of approval by the DA, the DOA certificate including the associated terms of approval will be
signed by the CEO/Chief Commissioner. The certificate and the terms will be sent to the applicant.

11.6 Changes to the approval
The approved design organization may make changes in the design assurance system or request
changes to the terms of approval. These changes must be classified by the DOA organization under
JCAR Part 21.A.247 and associated AMC and GM. If change found significant, application must be
made to CARC AWSD. The DOA Team leader, who will then initiate an investigation by the DOA
team in order to verify compliance with JCAR Part-21, the investigation must be concluded with a
final report with, if relevant, an updated scope of approval.
Changes not found to be significant will be dealt with during the process of continued surveillance.
The DOA Team leader is responsible for the management of the DOA surveillance activities and, in
order to ensure continuing compliance with JCAR Part 21, will:
 produce each year a program defining the surveillance activities of the coming year. The
first program shall be included in the final report. Each subsequent year, the annual
surveillance report of that year will contain the program for the next year. Programs shall be
structured in such way, that every 2 years the design organization is completely reviewed for
compliance with JCAR Part 21;
 take due consideration of information coming from CARC approval processes of design data
produced by the DOA holder (e.g. type certification, STC, design change approvals, repair
design, etc.);
 take due consideration of the DOA holder internal surveillance activities and results;
 ensure that corrective actions resulting from level 1 or 2 findings as identified in JCAR Part
21.A.258 from previous assessment or surveillance activities are concluded satisfactorily in
an acceptable time frame; and
 Produce an annual surveillance report.
Furthermore, the DOA team leader will each year plan an annual meeting dedicated to the review of
the internal system monitoring by the DOA holder in order to:
 Review the effectiveness of system monitoring activities and its results of the past year;
 Assess the program established by the DOA holder for the coming year, taking into account
the experience gained by the certification teams during type certification, approval of major
changes or repairs or continued airworthiness activities;
 Record which JCAR Part 21 requirements have been evaluated for continued compliance;
and
 Determine which surveillance activities will be performed by the team.
The tools to be used in the surveillance activities by the DOA Team include:
 Formal review to discuss specific points and to follow identified actions;

 The reporting system of the DOA holder and the subjects and results thereof;
 Specific analyses, based on anomalies seen through day-to-day working experience of
CARC approval processes, or reports from Foreign Authorities on anomalies in certification
approvals having a relationship with the design organization; and
 Audits to verify compliance with applicable requirements.

The annual surveillance report shall be submitted to the Chief Division for agreement and approval.
11.8 Noncompliance findings level 1 and 2
When the DOA Team leader has found evidence showing non-compliance with JCAR Part 21 of
the DOA holder, these non-compliances shall be classified in accordance with JCAR Part 21.A.258
by the team.
A level one finding shall be immediately notified to the DOA Holder and shall be confirmed by the
DA/or Chief Division in writing within three (3) working days after classification.
A level two finding shall be confirmed in writing by the DA/or Chief Division/or team leader to the
DOA holder within fourteen (14) working days after classification.
A level three finding shall be identified to the DOA holder in an audit report, meeting report or by
letter, as appropriate.
Level one and two findings shall be the subject of immediate actions of limitation, suspension or
revocation of the DOA certificate by CARC.
11.9 Limitation, suspension and revocation of the DOA
If the DOA certificate becomes invalid under JCAR Part 21 or when the DOA holder fails to
comply with Part 21 regulations and CARC fees and charges, the certificate shall be limited,
suspended or revoked by CARC.
When a level one or two finding has been made, the DA, through appropriate administrative
channels of CARC, shall partly or fully limit, suspend or revoke a DOA certificate as follows:
 In case of a level one finding, the DOA Team leader shall immediately propose to the Chief
Division to limit or suspend the DOA approval, relative to the scope of approval relating to
the level one finding, with immediate action, subsequently, these will be reported to DA and
approved by the CEO/Chief Commissioner. If the DOA holder fails to comply with JCAR
Part 21.A.258(c) (1) the certificate shall be revoked.
 In case of a level 2 finding, the team leader shall make proposals to the Chief Division for
restrictions of scope of approval by temporary suspension of the design organization
approval or parts thereof, subsequently; these will be reported to DA and approved by the
CEO/Chief Commissioner. If the DOA holder fails to comply with JCAR Part 21.A.258(c)
(2) the certificate shall be revoked.
The DA shall notify the DOA Holder in writing of these limitations, suspensions or revocation,
including the reasons thereof.

Part 12
Production Organization Approval
This procedure describes how CARC will handle initial applications for approval of production
organizations and how CARC organization is structured to perform this task.
The approval shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Jordan Civil Aviation
Regulations (JCAR) Part 21 Subparts F and G and will follow the related AMC and GM.
The approval of production organizations will be for an initial approval under Part 21 subpart G or
for an annual approval under special provisions under Part 21 subpart F and the continuation of
approval. The approved production organization or special approval shall be monitored under the
conditions of CARC Continued Surveillance Program, as to ensure continued compliance to the
requirements of JCAR Part 21.
approval, the change of limitations, suspension or revocation of POA approvals or special approval
and the resolution of non-compliances.
12.2 Organizational structure and capabilities
The Chief Division is responsible for the following:
 Make proposals to the DA for project teams;

 Display good team leadership and teamwork;
 Ensure that the project procedures are adhered to; and
 Resolution of team controversies.
Further, each investigation team for production approval application shall have a POA Team leader
and an appropriate number of POA specialists. For the purpose of continued surveillance, a
certification specialist may be seconded to the team, in order to evaluate level one findings.
The Team leader must be capable of performing the following duties:
 to initiate the procedure for the determination of the POA team, including size and the
specializations to be covered;
 where applicable to select suitable advisers for specialized areas of investigation;
 to organize the work of the team, with respect to planning, areas to be covered, work sharing
between team members, etc;
 to notify the applicant of the process which will be applied;
 to process alternatives to AMC or GM in JCAR Part 21 and reach agreement with the Chief
Division;
 to arrange liaison with Foreign Authorities in case of POA application from an applicant
outside the territory of Jordan;
 to report to the Chief Division any problems encountered and propose resolutions,
 to ensure liaison with Certification within Airworthiness Standards department with the
assistance of the team member with certification experience;
 to ensure adequate record keeping, using checkpoints during the investigating process, and
communicating these checkpoints with the Chief Division;

 To ensure that minutes of all formal meetings are taken and that these minutes of meeting
are agreed by the team and the applicant; and
 to report the findings to the Chief Division with a final report, with proposed terms of
approval and limitations as appropriate.
Team members shall:
 have knowledge of JCAR Part 21, e.g. having participated in appropriate JCAR Part 21
training courses;
 have an appropriate aviation experience;
 be able to verify that the applicant works in accordance with the applicant’s
Exposition/Manual;
 be able to check the effectiveness of the applicants procedures by audits; and be able to
verify the competence of the applicant’s personnel.
CARC trainees may participate in the team at no direct cost to the applicant.
Application can be made for POA under JCAR Part 21 Subpart G or for a production approval
using specific procedures under Subpart F.
Applicants whose principal place of business is located outside the territory of Jordan may apply for
a production approval under JCAR Part 21 if:
 they have a production approval issued by the Authority of the State of their principal
business for the same product, part or appliance for which they seek a Jordanian approval,
and if
 CARC has signed an Agreement or alike with the relevant Foreign Authority.
An application for POA approval must be sent to the Chief Commissioner by using CARC Form
18-0286 “Application for Production Organization Approval”. The application shall be
accompanied by a completed initial compliance checklist; CARC Form 18-0288 “Compliance
Checklist–Production Organization Approval”.
The application must include the name and address of the applicant, accompanied with a description
of the scope of the production organization and the requested terms of approval in relation to the
scope of production.
In case the application is not complete, or incorrect, the applicant will be given not more than a
three (3) months period for delivering the required information. If decision is to be taken that the
application cannot be accepted, CARC shall notify the applicant with reasons and shall show good
cause why it was to be decided to return the application without acceptance.
Upon acceptance by CARC, the applicant will be informed within one (1) month after receipt of the
 the acceptance of the application,

 the names of the Team leader and specialists of the assigned team;
 the administrative CARC program number; and
 receipt of any fees associated with the application.
The POA team leader will initiate the process by organizing a first meeting with the applicant for:
 A general presentation by the applicant, outlining the proposed scope of production and the
relationship between the holder of an approved design and the applicant for production
approval.
 A description by the POA team leader of the investigation process as described in this
Handbook.
The minutes of this meeting shall be kept on file for inclusion in the Final Report.
At the beginning of the investigation process for a POA under JCAR Part 21 subpart G, the POA
team shall:
 study the production organization exposition as meant in JCAR Part 21.A.143 and
associated data, including the proposed quality system as described in JCAR Part 21.A.139;
 take into account all experience the team members have accumulated about the applicant;
and
 take into account all in-service data of the other products, appliances or articles under a
JTSOA produced by the applicant.
The investigation program should contain:
 a brief description of the production organization (location of facilities, scope of work,

general overview of processes, organizational position of the accountable manager, his staff
and verifying engineers etc.;
 identification of key features of the production organization (design work sharing, methods
of compliance verification, airworthiness organization, internal process system monitoring
etc.);
 the functioning and effectiveness of the quality system;
 tasks to performed by the POA team; and
 detailed planning of the investigation program (dates, subjects , meetings locations etc.).
This preparatory phase is an internal POA team working phase, made up of individual team member
studies and preparations, and POA team working sessions managed and organized by the POA
Team leader. Any questions raised by the team will be recorded by the team leader for submittal to
the applicant and further processing during phase III, Investigation.
For the preparatory phase of an application for production approval under JCAR Part 21 subpart F
(Production without POA), the POA team will review the production organization inspection
system and determine, that the system is capable of ensuring, that the product, article or appliance
complies with and conforms to the approved design data and is in condition for safe operation. This

review must be based on a manual as meant in JCAR Part 21.A.125, provided by the applicant,
which must also contain a cross reference to all relevant provisions of JCAR Part 21 subpart F and
the compliance thereof.
Further, the POA team shall review the applicant’s capability to perform continued airworthiness
for the product, article or appliance in compliance with JCAR Part 21.A.3 and JCAR Part
21.A.129(d).
The investigation program for application under JCAR Part 21 subpart F will contain all elements
for which the team has questions or where the manual is unclear. Further, the team leader may
identify one or more sample audits relating to conformity check to be carried out during phase III at
the applicant location. Any questions raised by the team will be recorded by the team leader for
submittal to the applicant and further processing during phase III, Investigation.
At the closure of Phase II the POA team leader will submit the initially completed CARC Form 18-
0309 “Recommendation Report for POA” to the Chief Division for approval and agreement on the
investigation program.
12.4.3 Phase III Presentation to the applicant of the investigation program
The POA team leader will present the approved investigation program to the applicant and will
establish an agreed time schedule.
During this phase, the complete production system of the applicant, including the quality assurance
system and its effectiveness, shall be reviewed in order to determine exhaustively that the
production organization complies with JCAR Part 21, and to check as practical on a sample basis
that the applicant is actually producing in accordance with the system described in the applicants
exposition or production manual, including the inspection system.
For each subject defined in the investigation program, the following process will be followed:
 Preparation of a list of questions by the POA team, with cross references to JCAR Part 21;
 Sending the list of questions to the applicant by the POA Team leader;
 Review of the list of questions and the responses with the applicant during a meeting;
 Record all discrepancies in applying the requirements of JCAR Part 21 or its AMC and GM;
 Record the positions of team and applicant, until a satisfactory solution has been reached
and accepted by the Chief Division in the minutes of meeting;
 Follow up of all other questions raised until a satisfactory closure is obtained by the POA
team;
 Follow up of open actions up to their closures; and
 Perform audits on one or more samples with special attention to conformity checks, as
selected by the POA team leader.
During phase IV, the POA Team leader will make a status report to the Chief Division, as soon as
the key features of the production organization of the applicant have been assessed.
When new items are identified, the investigation program will be amended to include such items.
The team will take into account information from all sources as to the functioning of the procedures
and production system of the applicant that is available, e.g. from certification teams, maintenance
data or from previous experience with the applicant.

When all subjects of this phase have been processed as above and have been satisfactorily closed,
including the sample audit(s), then phase IV shall be deemed to be complete. However, it is
accepted, that some actions required by the POA team may take time for implementation and may
remain open at the end of this phase, provided a corrective action program proposed by the
applicant has been agreed by the POA team.
In this phase, the POA Team leader will prepare a final report CARC Form 18-0309
“Recommendation Report for POA”, using the input from the team members, and complete CARC
Approval Certificate and send the report and the form to the Chief Division. After review and
acceptance, the report and the form will be submitted to the DA for review and acceptance. The DA
will recommend the issuance of a certificate to the CEO/Chief Commissioner. Part of the final
report is the surveillance program for the first year after granting approval. The date of approval
will be the date of validity of the terms of approval.
The POA Team leader will provide the conclusions of the approved final report to the applicant.
After approval has been granted, the POA Team leader and the team will remain in place to handle
applications for changes/variations and to perform continued surveillance of the POA.
12.5 Issuance of the Production Organization Approval certificate
Following accepted closure of remaining items and questions, submission of the final report and
acceptance of the scope of work by the DA, the POA certificate for application under JCAR Part 21
subpart G, or the Letter of Agreement for application under Part 21 subpart F will be signed by the
CEO/Chief Commissioner. The certificate or Letter will be sent to the applicant.
Note: The certificate under JCAR Part 21 subpart G is valid for 24 calendar months, as long as
CARC has determined during continued surveillance that the provisions for approval are still in
compliance. The Letter of Agreement under JCAR Part 21 subpart F is valid only for one (1) year
and shall be returned to CARC after revocation, expiry or when surrendered. A new application
under subpart F must be made in such case, if production is to be continued requiring a production
organization approval.
Only POA approvals under JCAR Part 21 subpart G are eligible for application of change. Changes
for production organization approval under subpart F require a new application under that subpart.
The request for change of a POA approval under subpart G must be submitted by the approval
holder and will be classified by CARC under JCAR Part 21.A.147 and associated AMC and GM. If
found significant, application must be made to CARC, DA and Chief Division will then initiate an
investigation by the POA team in order to verify compliance with JCAR Part 21. The investigation
must be concluded with a final report with, if relevant, an updated scope of approval.
Changes not found to be significant will be dealt with during the process of continued surveillance.
The POA team leader is responsible for the management of the POA surveillance activities and for
POA approvals under subpart G, in order to ensure continuing compliance with JCAR Part 21, will:

 Produce each year a program defining the surveillance activities of the coming year. The
first program shall be included in the final report. Each subsequent year, the annual
surveillance report of that year will contain the program for the next year. Programs shall be
structured in such way, that every 2 years the production organization is completely
reviewed for compliance with JCAR Part 21;
 Take due consideration of information coming from CARC Continued Airworthiness
inspections (e.g. non compliances or non-airworthy conditions found with Certificates of
Airworthiness, or non-conformity inspections during production of type certificated
products, or repair design, etc.);
 Take due consideration of the POA holder internal surveillance activities and results;
 Ensure that corrective actions resulting from level 1 or 2 findings as identified in JCAR Part
21.A.158 from previous assessment or surveillance activities are concluded satisfactorily in
a acceptable time frame; and
 Produce an annual surveillance report.
Furthermore, the POA team leader will each year plan an annual meeting dedicated to the review of
the internal system monitoring by the POA holder in order to:
 review the effectiveness of system monitoring activities and its results of the past year;
 assess the program established by the POA holder for the coming year, taking into account
the experience gained by the Continued Airworthiness inspection teams during inspections
of Certificates of Airworthiness, or Part M or Part 145 findings related to continued
airworthiness activities;
 record which JCAR Part 21 requirements have been evaluated for continued compliance;
and
 determine which surveillance activities will be performed by the team.
The tools to be used in the surveillance activities by the POA Team include:
 formal regular review as needed to discuss specific points and to follow identified actions;
 the reporting system of the POA holder and the subjects and results thereof;
 specific analyses, based on anomalies seen through day-to-day working experience of
CARC approval processes, or reports from Foreign Authorities on anomalies in
airworthiness issues having a relationship with the production organization; and
 audits to verify compliance with applicable requirements.
The annual surveillance report shall be submitted to the Chief Division for approval.
For approvals under JCAR Part 21 subpart F, the team leader will initiate reviews if deemed
necessary during the period of validity of the Letter of Agreement.
12.8 Noncompliance findings level 1 and 2
When the POA team leader has found evidence showing non-compliance with JCAR Part 21 by the
POA holder, these non-compliances shall be classified in accordance with JCAR Part 21.A.158 by
the team.
A level one finding shall be immediately notified to the POA holder or the agreement holder and
shall be confirmed by the DA/or Chief Division in writing within three (3) working days after
classification.

A level two finding shall be confirmed in writing by the DA/or Chief Division/ or team leader to the
POA approval or agreement holder within fourteen (14) working days after classification.
A level three finding shall be identified to the POA holder or agreement holder in an audit report,
meeting report or by letter, as appropriate.
Level one and two findings shall be the subject of immediate actions of limitation, suspension or
revocation of the POA certificate or letter of agreement by CARC.
12.9 Limitation, suspension and revocation of the POA
If the POA certificate issued under JCAR Part 21 subpart G or F becomes invalid under JCAR Part
21 or when the POA holder fails to comply with CARC fees and charges, the certificate shall be
limited, suspended or revoked by CARC.
When a level one or two finding has been made, the DA, through appropriate administrative
channels of CARC, shall partly or fully limit, suspend or revoke a POA certificate as follows:
In case of a level one finding, the POA Team leader shall immediately propose to the Chief
Division to limit or suspend the POA approval, relative to the scope of approval relating to the level
one finding, with immediate action, subsequently, these will be reported to DA and approved by the
CEO/Chief Commissioner. If the POA holder fails to comply with JCAR Part 21.A.158(c)(1) the
certificate shall be revoked.
In case of a level 2 finding, the team leader shall make proposals to the Chief Division for
restrictions of scope of approval by temporary suspension of the production organization approval
or parts thereof, subsequently, these will be reported to DA and approved by the CEO/Chief
Commissioner. If the POA holder fails to comply with JCAR Part 21.A.158(c)(2) the certificate
shall be revoked.
The DA shall notify the POA approval holder in writing of these limitations, suspensions or
revocation, including the reasons thereof.

Part 13
Airworthiness Procedures, for the approval of leases among commercial air transport
operators
13.1 Introduction
Aircraft may be leased in or leased out, provided it can be shown that the aircraft conforms to OPS
and Continuing airworthiness and aircraft maintenance requirements as described in JCAR OPS
1.165.
The Convention on International Civil Aviation allocates certain safety oversight functions to the
State of Registry as described in:
1. Annexes 1,6&8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation

2. Article 83 bis of the Convention on International Civil Aviation
3. ICAO Circular 295
13.2 Purpose
The purpose of developing airworthiness related procedures for the approval of leases among
commercial air transport operators as they relate to airworthiness for the type of leases (dry, wet or
damp) is the determination of the responsibility for the signing of the maintenance release and the
airworthiness of the aircraft in conformity with the requirements of the continuing airworthiness and
aircraft maintenance performance requirements.
13.3 Applicability
The Procedure is applicable to the following cases:

• Dry lease of aircraft
• Wet lease of aircraft
• Damp lease of aircraft
The Dry lease case is the most common case that agreement under the provisions of Article 83 bis
may be needed. In each case the necessity of establishment of the agreement should be evaluated. It
is essential to understand that the preparation of the agreement takes some time and also upon
termination of the agreement some actions could be required in order to establish full control of the
State of Registry upon the aircraft.
13.4 Terminology
Terms used in this procedure have the following meaning:

Dry lease: is when the aeroplane is operated under the AOC of the lessee.
Wet lease: is when the aeroplane is operated under the AOC of the lessor.
Damp lease: A wet lease of an aircraft where the aircraft is operated under the AOC of the lessor,
with the flight crew and possibly part of the cabin crew being provided by the lessor. Part or all of
the cabin crew is provided by the lessee
13.5 Airworthiness Procedure

Prior approving an aircraft lease, The Airworthiness evaluation for approval of leases among
commercial air transport operators is through completing the CARC Form 18-0316 as amended to
ensure that the signing of the maintenance release has been considered and that the lease clearly
defines the responsibility of aircraft airworthiness as well as the AD compliance and the completion
of maintenance program tasks

13.6 Coordination with Flight Operations Standards Department
After completion of the form, a copy of it with signed memo shall be forwarded to Operations
Standards Department in order to complete the applicable Lease Agreement Application Form.
13.7 Form Completion Instructions
The following Instructions, to complete the Airworthiness Evaluation Checklist for the approval of
leases among commercial air transport operators as they relate to airworthiness, are:
A. Type of Lease (self-explanatory)
B. Applicant contact leasing details
1. AOC Name, Contact person email and Phone of Jordanian Operator as primary point of
contact for leasing.
2. State of Operator & contact details NAA to initiate leasing that involve foreign
aircraft/operator.
3. State of Registry (if different from the State of Operator) (contact details NAA).
4. Name and contact of the Lessee (lease-out) or Lessor
(lease-in).
C. Aircraft and equipment and maintenance arrangement details
1. Aircraft Model: (example Boeing B737-400)

2. Aircraft Nationality: describes the nationality of the aircraft (ICAO State of Registry)
3. Aircraft Registration, MSN (Serial Number)
D. Documentation to be submitted along with Lease agreement approval request
The copy of lease agreement should include:

 the aircraft details registration and MSN,
 parties to the lease;
 the areas of operation;
 operational and maintenance control;
 lease period;
 organization, which will maintain the aircraft (along with all maintenance approvals
held by that organization).
Summary of Audit Report / Acceptance Letter (lease in)
The audit report should identify that the party confirm they have adequate product and or
services to provide or to be delegated that meet safety standard and to be indicated in the lease
agreement
E. Assessment Status
All assessment status shall be with Yes answer for positive recommendation, otherwise AWI
remark shall be noted and justified in block G.
F. Dry lease responsibility

This article is applicable only for dry lease which involves transfer of oversight
G. Airworthiness Evaluation and recommendations

When the Block E is with all Yes, a positive recommendation shall be addressed.

Part 14
Forms
14.1 Forms
Forms are available in soft copy at AWSD server, and on CARC website. Forms are controlled in
accordance with the CARC Document Control (Doc. No. 25 QP-02), and detailed in CARC Order
18-7001, as amended.
14.2 Use of Forms
Airworthiness inspector is to use appropriate and current forms in accordance with Doc. No. 25 QP-
02., as amended.

Annex 1
CRI Procedure
1. Identification of significant issues,
Certification Review Items (CRIs) provide a simple, structured means of accomplishing several
necessary steps in the type certification process.
a) They provide a simple means for describing and tracking the resolution of significant or
controversial regulatory and associated technical policies and means of compliance, major
technical or administrative issues occurring throughout a program. By focusing on the
regulatory compliance issues, they enable the project team and Applicant management to
grasp and track the essential issues as they are identified and studied by all parties. They are
valuable tools for keeping the relevant parties both informed and involved in timely actions.
b) CRIs form a valuable reference for future type certification program, and for development of
regulatory changes. By describing significant or precedent setting technical decisions and
the rationales employed, they are ideal source documents.
c) The Certification Team will work closely with the Applicant for the earliest practicable
identification of CRI issues that may require special emphasis for resolution. This step will
usually require more detailed technical discussions, correspondence, review of design data
and hardware, etc. The Applicant should be encouraged to surface questions or issues that
may require time or special study for resolution so that all CRI issues can be identified as
soon as practicable and do not become surprises at a later time.
d) The Applicant should be advised that routine items relative to showing compliance and
work relationships will not normally be raised as "CRIs" unless some special problems are
anticipated or develop during the course of the program. Routine items will be handled with
the Applicant by the Team with decisions and actions documented in correspondence, data
submittals, and file records of meetings, conversations and events.
e) First priority should be placed on the identification, rather than the resolution of CRI issues.
Issues relating to the Certification Basis including Special Conditions need to be identified
as soon as possible in the program to enable the project milestones to be met. It is not
expected that significant technical issues would be resolved at the initial meeting with the
Team, although some such issues may become apparent during the discussions.
2. CRI Issues
For the following subjects a CRI must be raised.
a) Type Certification Basis (including, as applicable, environmental protection requirements),

b) Definition of the Type Design,
c) Additional Administrative Requirements for Certificate of Airworthiness,
d) Additional Design Requirements for Operational Approval,
e) The record and detail of Special Conditions,
f) The record and detail of Exemptions,
g) The record and detail of any Equivalent Safety Finding,
h) The record of means of compliance or interpretative material which is not consistent with
the content of applicable certification specifications (airworthiness code),
i) Controversial items between the Team and the Applicant
Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page A-1 of 14

j) For non-Jordanian products, identification and administration of the differences between the
Jordan Type Certification Basis and the Exporting Authority Certification Basis (Note: this
shall be processed and administered in accordance with GP AWS 02 Aircraft Type
Acceptance Certification)
3. CRI Development
For an overview of the CRI development process, see the flow chart (Figure B).
Every effort will be made to identify CRIs during the establishment of the Certification Basis,
however:
a) CRIs may be proposed to the PCM at any time during the process prior to the Type
Certification.
b) The CRI format and instructions are provided in detail in Section 5 below.
c) Draft CRIs will be developed by either the Team members, the PCM or the Applicant for
each significant issue as early in the program as practicable.
d) CRIs are primarily intended to provide Team/PCM and the Applicant with an overview of
significant issues, to provide a means of determining the status of these issues, and to
provide a post certification summary statement on how significant issues were resolved and
general reference on future projects that might encounter similar situations.
e) For non-Jordanian products the CRIs, if applicable, will be coordinated with the Exporting
Authority.
f) CRIs recording the Type Certification Basis, Special Conditions, Exemptions, Equivalent
Safety Findings or alternative means of compliance need the approval of the responsible
PCM, who may involve the panel of experts.
Each CRI at Issue 1 must include at least the "Statement of Issue" (see Paragraph 5.10 below)
before it is presented to the Applicant by the PCM. Some "Discussion" and even a tentative
"Position" may be provided to further clarify the issue. However, the major emphasis at Issue 1 of
each CRI should be to raise the issue to the PCM and Applicant's management attention as early as
practicable, providing a concise "Statement of Issue" that is clearly understood by all parties
concerned with the resolution.
4. The CRI Status Summary
a) The PCM will maintain a CRI Status Summary document. This document will contain a list
of all CRIs, the Issue No, Date, Subject Summary, Action, Target Closure Date and Status.
b) Updating of the Status Summary will occur on an "as needed" basis, as individual CRIs are
advanced in Issues.
c) Each revision of the CRI Status Summary will be circulated by the PCM to a standard
distribution list comprising the Applicant, all Team members, the PCM, and as applicable
the Exporting Authority
5. CRI Format
The format to be used in drafting CRIs is shown in Figure A. Instructions for completing the CRI
format are provided below, using the same Paragraph numbers as indicated on Figure A.
(1) Identify Applicant and model designation;

Example: [ACME Aircraft Company]
[Model AC-850]

(2) List relevant regulation(s), including any Special Condition(s) issued on the model;
Examples: CS-25.1309; or
Special Condition D-3
The following related information shall be shown, as appropriate:
(a) If a Special Condition has been, or will be, proposed.

Example: CS-29.1318
Special Condition Proposed
(b) If a petition for an exemption or reversion to an earlier airworthiness standard has been filed
by the applicant,
Example: CS-27.954 Exemption or Reversion.
(c) If an "Equivalent Safety Finding" is an issue,
Example: CS-23.789
Equivalent Safety Finding.
(3) List any advisory material or regulatory policy relevant to the issue, such as AMC, Interim
Policies and Guidance Material.
(4) Identify the issue by a short, concise, descriptive subject title;

Example: Head Up Display (HUD)
(5) Alphanumeric issue identifier, e.g. A-1, D-2, F-5 etc. The first digit is an alphabetic
identification of the technical area of prime concern using:
Administrative:
A Administrative & General

A-1 Agreed Type Certification Basis
A-xx Differences Jordan and Exporting Authority Type Certification Basis
(Validation Items)
A-xx Identification/recording of compliance finding delegation to Exporting
Authority with Validation Items
A-xx Additional National Design Requirements related to Operational Approval
A-xx Type Design Definition for Type Certification

For Aircraft:
B-xx Flight
C-xx Structures
D-xx Design & Construction
E-xx Powerplant
F-xx Equipment
G-xx Operating Limitations and Information including AFM
J-xx APU
K-xx AWO
M-xx MMEL
N-xx Noise and Emissions
O-xx Operational Items
For Engine and Propeller:
T-xx Technical
Note: xx is a sequential number.
(6) It is expected that most issues will be resolved in a number of phases identified by the
Issue number. The CRI will be revised by Team members to indicate significant progress,
and the Issue number will be raised for each such revision. The last Issue is when the CRI
is revised to summarize the resolution of the issue, including final Applicant and Jordanian
positions, the conclusion, and change of the CRI Status to "closed".
(7) The date at which the latest Issue is issued.
(8) The CRI Status will indicate the status of issue resolution, i.e. "OPEN" or "CLOSED".
The status "OPEN" or "CLOSED" DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE
COMPLIANCE STATUS. The CRI Status will remain "OPEN" until final action has been
completed.
(9) The "Next Action By" identifies the person(s) or body responsible for the next action in
progressing the closure of the CRI (e.g. PCM, Team, Applicant, etc.).
(10) The "Statement of Issue" is probably the most important part of the paper. The first and
most important step in resolving any significant issue is to formulate the issue in a clear,
short, and concise statement that is understood by all concerned.
Example:
The Applicant has requested approval of a Heads-Up Display (HUD)

installation. The Type Certification Basis (TCB) does not include approval criteria for HUD.

(11) When a CRI is first developed, the PCM should agree a closure target date with the
Applicant. Any change in this target date must be negotiated between the PCM and
Applicant.
(12) Provide a summary discussion of the issue. This may be broken down to:-
(a) A non-controversial background statement,
(b) CARC Position Statement to explain the concerns, opinions and arguments etc.
(c) Development by the Applicant of an Applicant's Position Statement, providing comments on

the issue, opinions, arguments, etc.
The discussion statement may be as long as necessary to document the background behind an issue
and to present both sides of the issue (if controversial); however, every effort should be made to
keep it as concise as possible without compromising understanding for resolution. Reference to
letters or other documents may be necessary to cover details.
At each subsequent Issue, the text from previous editions will normally be retained so that reference
back to previous Issues is not necessary to understand the status of resolution. The purpose of the
discussion statements is to provide an understanding of the issue and the most current position of all
parties, on its resolution and the path leading to the resolution.
(13) When a decision on how to resolve an issue has been reached, this decision will be
documented by the PCM in the "conclusion" statement. In some cases tentative conclusions
may be stated in advance of a final agreed position.

CARC
Figgure A
The Haashemite Kingdom
K o Jordan
of
Civil Aviiation Reggulatory Commissio
C on CRI No:
N (5)
CERTIFICATIO ON REVIE EW ITEM M
Issuee: (6)
[… (1)….]
[… (1)….]
Date:: (7)
Subject: (44) Statu
us: (8)
Requirem
ment referen nce: Nextt action by: (9)
(2)
(3)
Statementt of Issue: (110) Closure taarget date (11)
Discussion
n: (12)
Team Possition:
Applicantt’s Position:
Exportingg Authority Position (if applicable):
Conclusioon: (13)
CARC
C Form 18-289B (March 2013)
CARC
C Airworthinesss Inspector’s Handbook CARC Order 18-9015
CARC
An
nnex 2
TCDS
S Example
BRA
AVO Modell 70 Series (S
Sky-Knightt II) CDS J.A.001
TC
B
Bravo Aircrraft Compan
ny - Jordan
n Issue: 1
Date:
TYPE CERTIFI
C ICATE
DAT
TA SHEET
Civil Aviatioon Regulatory
y
Comm mission Paage .. of ..
Type
T Certifficate Data Sheet No. _______
__
This
T data shheet, which is part of Type Certifficate No; ___________
_ _ prescribess conditionss and
limitations
l under whicch the prodduct for whhich the Tyype Certificcate was isssued meetss the
airworthines
a ss and enviro
onmental prootection requuirements off Jordan.
Type
T Certifiicate Holder: Bravo Aiircraft Compaany Ltd.
P.O
O. Box 1234
Am
mman – Markaa Airport
Jorrdan
BRAVO
B Skyy-Knight II, Model
M 70-100/200/300 (N
Normal Categgory), approvved 25 Marcch 2006
Engine
E 1 Teleedyne Continnental TSIO520BE
Engine Tyype Certificcation standdard includees that of FAA
TCDS
T E8CE
E
When modified in accorddance with thhe Jordan appproved BR
W RAVO Modeel 70-
1000/200/300 Service Bulletin
B No. 71-11 (Enngine: Teled dyne Continnental
T
TSIO520CC) )
(See NOTE 7 regarding intermixingg of engines))
Fuel
F 1000/100LL minimum
m graade aviation ggasoline, forr alternate fu
uels see TCM
M
M
M773
Engine
E Lim
mits For all operation:
o
26600 RPM annd 38" Hg MAPM (310 HPP), sea level to 24,000 ftt
26600 RPM annd 35" Hg MAPM above 224,000 ft.
24400 RPM annd 31" Hg MAP

M maximuum when leaaned to 50° F lean of peaak,
an
ny altitude.
For other pow

werplant limiitations referr to the appliicable AFM//POH, sectioon 2.
Oil n accordancee with latest revision

In r of TCM
T SIL9922
Oil temperature limits Maximum 15 min.: 120oC
Fluid capacities Fuel : Total: 462 liters (122 US gal) in 2 wing tanks
Usable: 454 liters (120 US gal) in 2 wing tanks
Oil: Maximum: 7.6 liters (8 qts)

Minimum: 3.3 liters (3.5 qts)
Bleed air For maximum bleed air extraction from the engine refer to FAA Engine Type
Certification Data Sheet (TCDS E8CE).
Air Speeds Design Manoeuvring Speed, vA (1860 kg (4100 lb)) 135 KIAS
Design Manoeuvring Speed, vA (1111 kg (2450 lb)) 103 KIAS
Never Exceed Speed vNE 203 KIAS
Maximum Structural Cruising Speed, vNO 173 KIAS
Maximum Flap Extend Speed, vFE 120 KIAS
Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed, vLO
Extension 170 KIAS
Retraction 130 KIAS
Maximum Landing Gear Extended Speed, vLE 200 KIAS
Max. Operating Altitude 7620 m (25,000 ft)
Operational Capability VFR Day and Night

IFR Day and Night
Known Icing
Maximum Masses Ramp: 1868 kg (4118 lb)

TakeOff:1860 kg (4100 lb)
Landing: 1769 kg (3900 lb)
Centre of Gravity Range

Linear variation between given points
Weight Fwd. Limit Aft Limit

kg (lb) m (in) aft of datum m (in) aft of datum
1860 (4100) 3.640 (143.3) 3.736 (147.1)
1669 (3680) 3.457 (136.1) 3.736 (147.1)
1111 (2450) 3.320 (130.7) 3.736 (147.1)
or less
Datum 2.54 m (100") forward of forward pressure bulkhead.
Levelling Means Top or bottom fuselage at B.L. 0 (constant section).
Minimum Flight Crew 1 (Pilot)

Maximum Passenger Seating Capacity 5, for passenger seating locations see
applicable AFM/POH.
Baggage / Cargo Compartments 45 kg (100 lb) at +2.250 m (+88.6) (fwd.)

45 kg (100 lb) at +6.305 m (+248.23) (aft)

Wheels and Tyres Nose Wheel Tyre Size 5.00x5, 6 ply

Main Wheel Tyre Size 6.00x6, 8 ply
Maximum Cabin Operating Pressure Differential: 38.67 kPa (5.5 PSID)
Control Surface Movements For approved control surface deflections see applicable
Airplane Maintenance Manual (A.IV.).
Service information Pilot´s Operating Handbook (POH)
1. DOA No. JO1 approved Bravo Airplane Flight

Manual Report AFMR 123, Appendix D or Pilot's
Operating Handbook and JCAA approved Airplane
Flight Manual Report No. FMR-321, latest
approved revision, for Model 70-100/200 S/N
468100001 through 468100060, and 468200001
through 468200075.
2. DOA No. JO1 approved Pilot's Operating

Handbook and JCAA approved Airplane Flight
Manual Report No. FMR-321, latest approved
revision, for Model 70-300, S/N 468300001
through 468300150.
Airplane Maintenance Manual (AMM)

P/N 761783, latest approved revision (for all S/Ns)
Service Bulletins and Service Letters
Certification basis
1. Reference Date for determining the applicable requirements:
Date of application for CARC TC IM.A.019 August, 2004
2. (Reserved)
3. (Reserved)
4. Certification Basis: CS-23,

FAR 25.783(e) as amended by Amendment
2554,effective 14 October 1980; FAR 25.831(c) and (d)
as amended by Amendment 2541, effective 1
September 1977.
5. Airworthiness Requirements: CS-23, effective 14 November 2003
6. Requirements elected to comply: None
7. Special Conditions: No. 23ACE53, Docket No. 082CE

8. Exemption: None
9. Equivalent Safety Findings: None
10. Environmental Standards: ICAO Annex 16, Volume 1, Chapter 6
Notes
1. Applicable Manufacturer´s S/N: 468100001 through 468100060,

468200001 through 468200075,
468300001 through 468300150,
2. Approved Noise Levels: TBD (CARC noise certificate)
3. Weight and Balance: Current Weight and Balance Report, including list of equipment
included in certificated empty weight and loading
instructions when necessary, must be provided for each
aircraft at the time of original certification. The
certified empty weight and corresponding centre of
gravity locations must include undrainable system oil
(not included in oil capacity) and unusable fuel as noted
below:
Fuel: 5.44 kg (12 lb), at +3.870 m (+152.37 in)
Oil: 1.27 kg (2.8 lb), at +1.359 m (+53.5 in)
4. Placards: All placards required in the POH and AFM must be installed in the
appropriate locations. The following placard must be
displayed in clear view of the pilot: "The markings and
placards installed in this airplane contain operating
limitations which must be complied with when
operating this airplane in the Normal Category. Other
operating limitations which must be complied with
when operating this airplane in this category are
contained in the Airplane Flight Manual. No aerobatics
manoeuvres, including spins, approved."
5. Life Limitations (see AMM chapter 5): The life limit of the fuselage assembly, P/N 82250, is
10,145 hours time in service.
The life limit of the wing assembly, P/N 83100, is
15,580 hours time in service.

Annex 3
(Reserved)

CARC
An
nnex 4
CARC
C Airworthinesss Inspector’s Handbook CARC Order 18-9015

CARC Order 18-9015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CARC Order 18-9015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CARC Airworthiness Inspector’s Handbook CARC Order 18-9015

0.2 Table of Contents

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-2 of 12

Part 3 Registration of Aircraft

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-3 of 12

6.4.5 CARC Review of Findings

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-4 of 12

7.12 Training In-Progress Inspection

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-5 of 12

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-6 of 12

9.49 Certificate Renewal

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-7 of 12

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-8 of 12

14.2 Use of Forms

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-9 of 12

0.3 List of Effective Pages

Page Issue Rev Date

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-10 of 12

0.4 Amendment Record

0.4.1 Reasons for revisions

0.4.2 Document control

0.4.3 Amendment Record Status

Issue No. Revision No. Date

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-11 of 12

0.5 Distribution list

No. Manual Holder

0.6.1 Civil Aviation Law No. 41 of 2007, as amended.

0.7 Abbreviations, terminology and definitions

0.8 Fees and charges

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 0-12 of 12

1.1 Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission (CARC)

1.2 Safety Oversight Directorates

1.3 Airworthiness Standards Directorate (AWSD)

AWSD consists of the following Divisions:

- Aircraft and CAMO (Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations),

1.3.1 Aircraft and CAMO Division

1.3.2 Role of the Aircraft and CAMO division

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 1-1 of 7

1.3.3 AMO and MTO Division

1.3.4 Role of the AMO and MTO division

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 1-2 of 7

1.3.7 Management Personnel of Airworthiness

The following management personnel are employed within the AWSD:

- Director Airworthiness Standards,

1.3.8 Duties and Responsibilities

1.3.8.1 Director Airworthiness Standards

The Director Airworthiness Standard is responsible for the following functions:

1. Evaluate Civil Aviation Regulations in respect of Airworthiness matters and to make

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 1-3 of 7

1.3.8.2 Chief Division; Aircraft and CAMO

1.3.8.3 Chief Division; AMO and MTO

1.3.8.4 Airworthiness Inspector

The duties of the Airworthiness Inspector are as follows:

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 1-4 of 7

Issue No: 06 Revision No: 00 Date: Aug. 2016 Page 1-5 of 7

1.4 Organization Chart

The Directorate consists of two divisions responsible for JCAR Parts:

1. Part 21, Part 47 and Part M, and

The Directorate is supported by the administration staff:

Director Airworthiness Standards

Airworthiness Administrator Secretary

Chief Aircraft, Chief AMO

Airworthiness Standards Inspectors Airworthiness Standards Inspectors