Final Year Design Project (FYDP) CLOs and Assessment Method

(Session: 2019)

CLOs Description Domain & Level PLO Assessment Method

Students will be able to develop a broader Cognitive PLO1, Presentation I
Measurable Learning Outcomes

CLO 1 understanding of the problem area. Understand (2) (Engineering Knowledge)

Students will be able to collect and review the Cognitive PLO4 Presentation II and Interim
CLO 2
literature from various sources. Remember (1) (Investigation) Report Evaluation
Cognitive PLO3
Students will be able to devise suitable methodology Presentation II and Interim
CLO 3 Apply (3) (Design/Development of
for the solution of the given problem. Report Evaluation
Solutions)
Students will be able to evaluate and analyze the
Cognitive PLO 2 Presentation III/ Interim
CLO 4
results. Analyze (4) (Problem Analysis) Report Evaluation
Affective PLO 11
Students will be able to organize and plan the Presentation IV and Final
CLO 5 Organization (2) (Project Management)
assigned project. Report Evaluation
Students will be to demonstrate their work in the Psychomotor PLO 10 Presentation IV and Final
CLO 6
form of a report and presentation. Precision (3) (Communication) Report Evaluation
Students will be able to apply modern Cognitive PLO 5
CLO 7 Final Report Evaluation
engineering/IT tools for data analysis of the project. Apply (3) (Modern Tool usage)
Students will be able to assess the problem in Cognitive PLO 7 Final Report Evaluation
CLO 8 environmental perspective for sustainable Evaluate (5) (Environment and
development. Sustainability)
Students will be able to demonstrate ethical Affective PLO 8 Plagiarism Check of Report
CLO 9 principles, responsibilities and norms of various Valuing (3) (Ethics)
practices involved in the project accomplishment.
 Students will be able to apply the contextual Cognitive PLO 6 Final Report Evaluation
CLO 10 knowledge for addressing the issues of society Apply (3) (The Engineer and
related to engineering practices. Society)
Affective PLO 9 Poster Presentation
Students will be able to defend the work effectively,
CLO 11 Respond (4) (Individual and
as an individual or in a team.
Teamwork)
Students will be able to identify the learned values Affective PLO 12 Presentation-IV and Final
CLO 12
into priorities. Respond (4) (Lifelong Learning) Report Evaluation
Project Title: Design and Optimization of the Crossflow Hydro-Turbine
Supervisor: Dr. Jamal Umar Students Name & Roll No: 1: Muhammad Hamza Hafeez 2019-ME-32 2:
Abdul Rasheed 2019-ME-34 3: Syed Qaiser Abbas 2019-ME-47

Project Presentation I Evaluation Rubrics: Date: 16-12-2022

CLO1: Students will be able to develop a broader understanding of the problem area.

Assessment Rubrics
Level Barely acceptable Basic Good Very good
Points 0-2 point 3-5 points 6-8 points 9-10 points
Problem Understanding/ • Basic concepts used correctly • Superficial usage of new concepts • Minor innovative work • • Innovative work with research
Ingenuity of Idea/ Use of • Understanding of technology, with Technology concepts / technique, value
• Lack in use of Technology
technology basic understanding with good understanding • New concepts and Technology
used frequently and solve technical
difficulties;
Commitment to • Demonstrated no real • Sometimes missed deadlines. • Rarely late for meetings • Met all deadlines (in rare and
behaving professionally commitment to professional and • Worked hard at times, but not • Mostly worked hard and genuine cases, informed as early as
and ethically ethical behavior. professionally possible of a delay)
consistently
• Tried once to pass off copied • Always worked hard and gave
work as his/her own. 100%
Oral communication/ • Presentation does not have a clear • Presentation has clear • Presentation has clear organizational • Presentation has a clear organizational
Presentation Quality organization organizational structure structure structure
• Points are vague • Some points are vague • Point are mostly clear and logical • Points are logical and lucid.
• Multimedia makes the • Reads off the slides • Does not read from the slides • Engages the audience with his
presentation worse presentation style and effective use of
multimedia
Project Presentation II Evaluation Rubrics:
Project Title: Surfaces Design and Optimization of the Crossflow Hydro-Turbine
CLO2: Students will be able to collect and review the literature from various sources Registration #: 2019-ME-32 + 2019-ME-34 + 2019-ME-47
CLO3: Students will be able to devise suitable methodology for the solution of the given problem.
Assessment Rubrics
Level Barely acceptable Basic Good Very good
Points 0-2 point 3-5 points 6-8 points 9-10 points
Literature search/ • Bare literature review • Some literature review • Adequate literature review • Sufficient literature review •
Problem Formulation/ • Bare problem formulation and • Basic problem formulation and • Clear problem formulation and Clear formulation with well-defined
Individual analysis individual analysis individual analysis individual analysis scope and individual analysis

Complex engineering • Bare understanding of the • Basic understanding of the problem • Good understanding of the problem • Very good understanding of the problem
problem/ problem and its solution, with and its solution, but lack and its solution, with study of and its solution.
Design of systems, scarce knowledge of relevant appropriate study of relevant relevant material
components material material
• Good problem analysis
Processes integrating
core areas /Solution
Methodology/ Solution
Features/
Computational data
analytics
Commitment to • Demonstrated no real • Sometimes missed deadlines. • Rarely late for meetings • Met all deadlines (in rare and genuine
behaving professionally commitment to professional and • Worked hard at times, but not • Mostly worked hard and cases, informed as early as possible of a
and ethically ethical behavior. professionally delay)
consistently
• Tried once to pass off copied • Always worked hard and gave 100%
work as his/her own.
Oral communication/ • Presentation does not have a
Presentation Quality clear organization
• Points are vague
• Multimedia makes the
presentation worse
Documentation/ Report • No Format and No
Writing Quality report structure is followed •
Frequent errors in spelling and
grammar
• Barely readable
• Presentation has clear
organizational structure
• Some points are vague
• Reads off the slides
• Format and report structure is
mostly followed
• Some errors in spelling and
grammar
• Readable
• Presentation has clear organizational • Presentation has a clear organizational
structure
• Point are mostly clear and logical
• Does not read from the slides
• Format and report structure is
adequate
• A few errors in spelling and
grammar
• Readable and easy
structure
• Points are logical and lucid.
• Engages the audience with his
presentation style and effective use of
multimedia
• Well proofread for format and report
structure
• Clear, Readable and easy to understand
• Graphs and diagrams used appropriately
Project Presentation III Evaluation Rubrics:
Project Title: Design and Optimization of the Crossflow Hydro-Turbine
CLO4: Students will be able to analyze and evaluate the results.
Assessment Rubrics
Level Barely acceptable
Points 0-2 point
Analysis of the problem • No identification • No real
reaching substantiated connection between problem
results and results
• Bare understanding of
outcomes
Commitment to behaving • Demonstrated no real
professionally and commitment to professional
ethically and ethical behavior.
• Tried once to pass off copied
work as his/her own.
Oral communication/ • Presentation does not have a
Presentation Quality clear organization
• Points are vague
• Multimedia makes the
presentation worse
Basic
3-5 points
• Little identification.
• Tries to relate outcomes.
• Sometimes missed deadlines.
• Worked hard at times, but not
consistently.
• Presentation has clear
organizational structure
• Some points are vague
• Reads off the slides
Registration #: 2019-ME-32 + 2019-ME-34 + 2019-ME-47
Good Very good
6-8 points 9-10 points
• Significant identification. • Deep identification
• Sufficient understanding of problem • Effective and logical understanding
and outcomes. of the problem along with outcomes.
• Rarely late for meetings • Met all deadlines (in rare and
• Mostly worked hard and genuine cases, informed as early as
professionally possible of a delay)
• Always worked hard and gave 100%
• Presentation has clear organizational • Presentation has a clear organizational
structure structure
• Point are mostly clear and logical • Points are logical and lucid.
• Does not read from the slides • Engages the audience with his
presentation style and effective use of
multimedia
Project Presentation IV Evaluation Rubrics:
Registration #: 2019-ME-32 + 2019-ME-34 + 2019-ME-47
Date: 15-05-2023
CLO5: Students will be able to organize and plan the assigned project.
CLO6: Students will be to present their work in the form of a report and presentation.
CLO7: Students will be able to apply modern engineering/IT tools for data analysis of the project.
CLO8: Students will be able to assess the problem in environmental perspective for sustainable development.
CLO9: Students will be able to demonstrate ethical principles, responsibilities and norms of various practices involved in the project accomplishment.
CLO10: Students will be able to apply the contextual knowledge for addressing the issues of society related to engineering practices.
CLO11: Students will be able to defend the work effectively, as an individual or in a team.
CLO12: Students will be able to identify the learned values into priorities.

Assessment Rubrics
Level Barely acceptable Basic Good Very good
Points 0-2 point 3-5 points 6-8 points 9-10 points
Evaluation of Design • Obvious solution, sketchy • Simple, yet mostly complete • Complete solution with significant • Provide a design solution to complex
Process/Solution / Firmware and functionalities design and solution. required features. engineering problems
Algorithm Engineering/ • Adequate usage of modern tool/ • Sufficient usage of modern tool/ • Demonstrate through a clear structure
• Less design involved
Informatics related to the program Engineering software. Engineering software. using modern tool usage.
• Bare usage of modern tool/
to demonstrate a functional
Engineering software.
concept/ Modeling and simulation/
AI (Artificial Intelligence) /
Computational data analytics /
Design and putting together
various hardware, software/

Commitment to behaving
professionally and ethically/
• Demonstrated no real
commitment to professional
and ethical behavior.
• Tried once to pass off copied
work as his/her own.
• Sometimes missed deadlines. • Rarely late for meetings • Met all deadlines (in rare and genuine
• Worked hard at times, but not • Mostly worked hard and cases, informed as early as possible of a
consistently professionally delay)
• Always worked hard and gave 100%
 Oral communication/ • Presentation does not have a
Presentation Quality clear organization
• Points are vague
• Multimedia makes the
presentation worse
• Presentation has clear
organizational structure
• Some points are vague
• Reads off the slides
• Presentation has clear
organizational structure
• Point are mostly clear and logical
• Does not read from the slides
• Presentation has a clear organizational
structure
• Points are logical and lucid.
• Engages the audience with his
presentation style and effective use of
multimedia

Documentation/ Report • No Format and No
Writing Quality report structure is followed •
Frequent errors in spelling
and grammar
• Barely readable
• Format and report structure is • Format and report structure is • Well proofread for format and report
mostly followed adequate structure
• Some errors in spelling and • A few errors in spelling and • Clear, Readable and easy to understand
grammar grammar • Graphs and diagrams used appropriately
• Readable • Readable and easy

Project management/ Sustainable • Clueless about achievable
Development Goals goals
• Hardly reviews personal
progress
• Little ability to manage a team
• Does not learn from his
mistakes
• Sets achievable personal goals
• Tries to monitor personal
progress
• Struggles to decide on the
suitability of assigned
tasks.
• Tries to learn from his mistakes
but lacks the motivation.
• Sets achievable goals
• Monitors personal progress
• Accepts appropriate tasks from
group leaders
• Occasionally self reflects and learns
from the past.
• Sets achievable and challenging goals
• Monitors progress and helps the team
follow a clearly defined timeline
• Learns quickly from mistakes and
effectively incorporates lessons leant in
future strategies

Ability to work effectively at an
individual level and as a team
member in interdisciplinary and
multidisciplinary environments
• Barely completes his tasks • Completes his own tasks • Completes his own tasks and • Competes his own tasks and helps
• Occasionally shares simple occasionally volunteers to help other members achieve their goals
• Passive member of team
• Helps the team move forward by
• Avoids multifaceted problems alternatives to existing solutions others
• Uncomfortable with proposing innovative, constructive
and thinks linearly. • Successfully and coherently builds
multidisciplinary problems on proposed solutions by the options to multidisciplinary problems
• Causes team disputes Personally, avoids conflict • Resolves conflicts in ways that
group
• Shows some degree of comfort in strengthen the team
diverse environments
Comprehension of the larger
context of the problem and
appreciation of the impact of the
proposed solutions to the society at
large
Realization of the importance of
Public health and safety Cultural
and Societal, environment and
sustainability
Lifelong learning
• Complete disregard for such
issues
• Complete ignorance about
environmentally responsible,
sustainable engineering
solutions
• Does not explore a topic
• Mostly completes the
assigned work
• Makes vague references to
previously learnt knowledge
• Has no deeper interest in self-
reflection and personal
growth
• Minor interest in the relationship
between society, and their
engineering problem.
No effect on proposed solutions
• Minor interest in environment
and sustainable engineering
• No effect on engineering design
• Explores a topic at surface level
• Completes the assigned work •
Tries to use previously learnt
engineering principles in new
situations
• Occasionally reflects on
academic and nonacademic.
• Significant interest and
appreciation of the impact of their
solutions to the society at large.
Design impacted to some degree
by such considerations
• Significant interest in environment
and sustainable development •
Minor impact on engineering design
• Explores a topic in depth showing a
significant interest in the subject
• After completing the assigned
work, initiates unassigned
independent inquiry
• Uses previously learnt engineering
principles to interesting problems
• Reflects on academic and
nonacademic experiences for
personal growth
• Deep appreciation of the relationship
between society and the engineer
Engineering design fundamentally
determined by the impact on society.
• Deep appreciation of the importance of
environmentally friendly and sustainable
engineering solutions • Design
fundamentally impacted by these
considerations
• Explores a topic in depth yielding new
insights and showing an interest.
• After completing the assigned work,
initiates unassigned independent inquiry
• Effectively uses previously learnt
engineering principles in new and
innovative ways to challenging
problems
• Reflects on academic and nonacademic
experiences for meaningful self-growth
and development