You are on page 1of 2

Level 2 – Contractor Staff Fatality Incident at Utorogu 32 Well Test

Site- 30th November 2005.

Date & time of incident 30/11/05 at 1345hrs

Region, EP Company, asset team, location EPG, SPDC, Wells, Utorogu-32 Well Test

Proposed classification at time of writing C4P.

. Lessons learned
Incident description • Banned 2” 602 unions are still around despite a
At about 1345 hours on 30/11/2005, a contractor staff clause in the contract stipulating only 2” 1502
while operating a sand filter valve in a temporary well unions.
test setup, sustained a severe injury caused by the • Unsafe practices based on past experience should
impact from a female hammer union inadvertently not be accepted
dislodged from a side outlet, as well testing was in • HAZOP need to clearly state the hazard and not
progress. He was thrown 19 ft from the sand filter just recommendation
equipment. He was immediately medevaced to Ufor • All equipment must have proper historical
Clinic, Ughelli where he underwent emergency documentation before use
surgery. He later died in the clinic.

Provision of photograph or sketch


Outcome
1 x Fatality.

Immediate causes
• Connection that failed was a mismatch between
the male and female 2” hammer Union (602
female to 1502 male).
The potential hazard of such an easy mismatch
was already identified more than 10 years ago
and 2” 602 hammer unions had been banned
from Shell operations since. Shell procedures
and the relevant contract state that only 2” 1502
should be used.
• The victim stood directly in front of the failed
side outlet (hammer union), which was under a
pressure of approximately 3500 psi, while
operating the desander/middle valve – see
picture.
• Configuration of equipment at Utorogu-32 was
not in compliance with manufacturer’s design
layout. Manufacturer’s configuration included a
ladder/working platform for operating the middle
valves plus different orientation of the valves,
which would have positioned the victim at a
different and safe angle while working on the
valves.
Level 3 – Contractor Staff Fatality at Utorogu 32 Well Test Site-
30th November 2005.

Date & time of incident 30/11/05 at 1345hrs


Region, asset team, location EPG, SPDC, Wells, Utorogu-32 Well Test
Proposed classification at time of writing C4P.

Incident description Immediate actions


At about 1345 hours on 30/11/2005, a contractor staff • SPDC, Halliburton and Power Well Services
working for Power Well Services (PWS) while stopped work on all sites, and ran a check on all
operating a sand filter valve in a temporary well test temporary piping to remove non-standard
setup, sustained a severe injury caused by the impact hammer unions from site.
from a female hammer union inadvertently dislodged • Alerted SNEPCO, EA and Expro well test group
from a side outlet, as well testing was in progress. He to check and remove 2” 602 unions from their
was thrown 19 ft from the sand filter equipment. He installations.
was immediately medevaced to Ufor Clinic, Ughelli • Removed the Krebs desander from Utorogu-32
where he underwent emergency surgery. He later died site, replaced it with a desander that have a safe
in the clinic. operating platform.

Outcome Underlying causes


1 x Fatality. • Insufficient dissemination of alerts on Hammer
union. Alerts on the danger of mismatch b/w
Main findings from investigation 1502 & 602 were sent out but did not reach all
• Valve orientation in the as-built assembly is intended recipients.
different from the design layout. Change of valve • Manufacturer’s Assembling of Equipment Parts
orientation aligned the discharge valves and the not according to Design
side outlet with the middle valves • Inadequate handover of equipment/manual
• Design configuration included a ladder/working Equipment was handed over to PWS without
platform for operating the middle valves but necessary/relevant documentations/drawings.
Equipment set up at Utorogu 32 and in previous • Inadequate HAZOP and HAZOP implementation
locations by PWS did not provide it.
• Failed connection was the result of a mismatch
between the male and female hammer Union ( 2“ Senior management actions to address
602 female to 2” 1502 male). underlying causes
• HAZOP identified absence of permanent safe • Print laminated alerts; hang on connections and
access to middle valves and a temporary ladder temporary piping facilities and issue to all
was provided to close out the action item personnel to increase awareness
• HAZOP did not identify the potential hazard • Verify that alerts have been communicated to
with valve orientation and configuration. relevant contractors and check that it is discussed
Main causes during regular office and site safety meetings.
• Run a check on all equipments used for high-risk
• Inspection (physical check) was not done to
operations to confirm that they are in line with
identify mismatch between the male and female
2” hammer Union design specifications.
• Provide HAZOP training for relevant Well
• Rig up configuration did not provide for
Services personnel.
platform/permanent access to operate the middle
valves • Develop a code of practice for Temporary Well
Test and other non-rig related temporary
• The victim stood directly in front of the failed
pressure equipment set-ups.
side outlet (hammer union) while operating the
desander/middle valve.
• As built Configuration (Valve orientation) is
different from the design layout.

You might also like