Difference bet

Description AON PON

space required for system technology high low
space required for cable high low
Energy consumption High low
Level of Maintenance high Low
Bandwidth Allocation Good Average
Bandwidth increasing simple difficult
Imapact of fault in access node low high
impact of malfunction low high
Reliability of the end subscriber in Access network Good (Ring Topology) Poor
Cost High low
Maximum length of end device or user 100 KM 20 KM

Description PSCA PON

Energy consumption High Low
Level of Maintenance High Low
Cost Low High
Reliability of the end subscriber in Access network Good (Ring Topology) Poor

Bandwidth increasing Simple Difficult

Impact of malfunction Low High
Bandwidth Allocation Good Average
Imapact of fault in access node Low High
Maximum length of end device or user 100 KM 20 KM

Impact of converting
Description PSCA PON
Cost Low Too High
Reliability of the end subscriber in Access network Good (Ring Topology) Poor

Bandwidth increasing Simple Difficult

potentially impacting a Impact on a
Impact of Fiber Cut specific link broader area

Residential areas,
Business environments, broadband
Sustainability data centers access
Impact of malfunction Low High
Bandwidth Allocation Good Average
Imapact of fault in access node Low High
Maximum length of end device or user 100 KM 20 KM
Energy consumption High Low

Level of Maintenance High Low

 Difference between AON and PON
Assesment
PON is Best
PON is Best
PON is Best
PON is Best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
PON is Best
Current Scenario is best

Assessment
PON is Best
PON is Best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best

Current Scenario is best

Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best

Impact of converting the PSCA network to PON

Assessment
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best

Current Scenario is best

Current Scenario is best

Current Scenario is best

Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
Current Scenario is best
PON is Best

PON is Best
ce between AON and PON
Remarks
PON is best as there is no need of racks as in Police stations
PON save the optical cable
PON save energy due to the spliter
PON network no need to power supply and ups for the network spliters, in the ring power impact on all other sites

in the worst case scenario a single ONT can bring an entire PON tree with upto 64 subscriber down
(end device is not twice in one PON)

Remarks
PON save energy due to the spliter
PON network no need to power supply and ups for the network spliters, in the ring power impact on all other sites
New PON Infrastructure need to deplay (we have already AON Infrastructure)
(end device is not twice in one PON)

in the worst case scenario a single ONT can bring an entire PON tree with upto 64 subscriber down

verting the PSCA network to PON

Remarks
New PON Infrastructure need to deplay (we have already AON Infrastructure)
(end device is not twice in one PON)

in the worst case scenario a single ONT can bring an entire PON tree with upto 64 subscriber down
PON save energy due to the spliter

PON network no need to power supply and ups for the network splitters, in our rings power impact on all other sites